Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2000-2005 Parks and Recreation 5-year (Master) Plan
City of Lansing �;� r a��74, �� ai �u�M°��c�;®•�ca�iv� ��lr x Master Y ; Document: 2000-2005 Parks and Recreation 5-year (Master) Plan Ilr„ TABLE OF CONTENTS City of Lansing 2000-2005 Parks & Recreation Master Plan March 1, 2000 TITLE DNR Checklist Acknowledgments Introduction Director's Comments Section I COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION Demographics (See 'Demographic Study" document, which supplements this master plan) Physical Characteristics Section 2 SECTION I -V Vi - Vii Viii - ix ix - xi 1.1 - 1.26 COMMUNITY ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE 2.1 - 2.18 (Operation Budget, Organizational Structure, Standard Operating Procedures, Commission/Advisory Board(s), Relationships with other Agencies, and Staff Descriptions) Section 3 PLANNING PROCESS 3.1 - 3.7 (Plan Development, Key People Involved, Public Involvement, Results) .Section 4 RECREATION INVENTORY 4.1 - 4.41 .Section S ACTION PLAN 5.1 - 5.35 (Goals & Objectives, Capital Improvements Schedule, Action Program Rationale) Appendices Appendix A - Focus Group Reports A.1 - A.45 Appendix B - Correspondence 13.1 - B.5 Appendix C - Public Meeting Notices, Agendas & Minutes C.1 - C.54 Appendix D - Other Plans Referenced D.1 - D.2 Appendix E - Master Project List E.1 - E.10 Appendix F - FY 2001 City CIP List F.1 - F.2 Appendix G - Program and Operational Needs List G.I Appendix H - Grant Project Maps H.1 - H.2 STATE OF MICHIGAN NATURAL RESOURCES a COMMISSION 0 REPLY TO: KEITH J. CHARTERS, Chair GRANTS MANAGEMENT SECTION JERRY C. BARTNIK FINANCIAL SERVICES DIVISION NANCY A. DOUGLAS JOHN ENGLERGovernor 530 W ALLEGAN ST , L. THORNTON EDWARDS, JR. PO BOX 30425 PAULEISELE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES LANSINGMI 46909-7925 BOB GARNER STEVENS T MASON BUILDING, PO BOX 30028, LANSING MI 48909-7528 FAX: (517) 335-6813 WILLIAM U. PARFET WEBSITE: wwwAmstatenims R E C E I V E u r,:; K. L. COOL, Director PARKS & RECREATION FEB 2 92;' 2000 February 16, 2000 I Mr. R: Eric Reickel, Director F Parks and Recreation City of Lansing 318 N. Capitol Avenue Lansing, MI 48933 Dear Mr. Reickel SUBJECT: City of Lansing Recreation Plan Please find attached your copy of the recreation -plan checklist you recently submitted to our office for approval. Your recreation plan has been approved. Your five-year recreation plan will expire February 14, 20054 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Lj-�. /4� Linda J. Hegstrom, Grants Coordinator Grants Management Section Financial Services Division 517-241-4128 LJH:lh Attachment R 1026E (Rev. 08106/1999) Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Financial Services Division, Grants Management Section DNVR COMMUNITY RECREATION PLAN CERTIFICATION CHECKLIST By Authority of- Paris 19, 703 and 716 of Act 451. P.A. 1994, as amended, submission of this information is required for eligibility to apply for grants adoptedThis Checklist must be completed, signed and submitted With a locally- ,II community recreation plans are required to meet the content and local approval standards as outlined in the Community Recreation Planning guidelines provided by the Department of Natural Resources and listed in this checklist. For a plan to be approved by the Department of Natural Resources, it must be accompanied by this checklist, completed and signed by an authorized official of the local unit of government submitting the plan. PLAN CONTENT The plan must include all of the information indicated below. The plan must contain information for each of the main categories (A, B. C. D, and E) and all information applicable to the community for each of the subcategories. For each main category indicate that the plan includes this information with a "✓" in the "Included in the Plan" Column. Some subcategories of information may not pertain to all communities. For subcategories, indicate that information is.included in the plan with a "✓" in the "Included in the Plan" Column or if a subcategory does not apply to the community, indicate with a "✓" in the "N.A." column and provide a brief explanation of why it does not apply in the "Comments" Column. If the "N.A." column is blacked out for a specific Plan Element that element is required and "not applicable" is not an appropriate response. PLAN ELEMENT Included in Plan N.A. COMMENTS Includina explanations for all N A.'s A. COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION, INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING: 1. Data and Discussion of Social Characteristics, including the following: Also see 1995 [All Information must be from the most recent U.S. Census, unless otherwise indicated in the Demographic Study "Comments" Column.] a. Age X b. Employment Trends X c. Households X d. Persons with Disabilities X e. Population X f. Race/Ethnic Groups X . Gender X h. Senior Citizens X 2. Description of Physical Characteristics, including the following: a. Use Patterns and Zoning X _Land b. Topography X c. Water Resources and Fish and Wildlife X d. Soils and Vegetation X e. Transportation Systems X f Climate I X q. Maps to illustrate the above X I B. DESCRIPTION OF COMMUNITY ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE, INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING: i 1. Operating Budget X 2. Organizational Chart X 3. Standard Operation Procedures X 4. Commission or Advisory Board X i 5. Relationship(s) with Other Agencies X 6. Staff Description X I 7. Other ' Continued next page »»»»»»»> i PR 1924.1 (01;2811S59- - PLAN ELEMENT Included In Plan N,A,-UPnnntNTS Including ex lanations for all N.A.'s C. DESCRIPTION OF THE PLANNING PROCESS, INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING: 1. Discussion of the Plan Development Process X 2. Description of the key persons involved in the process X 3. Description of Public Involvement Process used in Development of the Plan: a. Overall Description of Public Input Process X b. Description of the Method Used "✓" if Date (Indicate the types and dates of the used methods used below) • Public Hearin s X 177-317 oo • Survey(s) • Workshops/Informational • Informational Letters • Informational Flyers • Telephone Calls Description of Planning Results (Indicate under 'Comments" Column if this description is included in X the body of the plan or in the appendices.) D. RECREATION INVENTORY, INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING: Information in the Plan should be current and from an inventory conducted no more than 24 months prior to the date the plan was adopted locally. 1. Description/inventory of Recreation Opportunities within the community's political boundaries, Including: X a. Public Properties/Facilities X X b. School Properties/Facilities X c. Private Pro erties/Facilities 2. Description/Inventory of Recreation Opportunities outside the X community's political boundaries. 3. Ma s showing location of facilities X 4. Description of Community's Barrier -Free Compliance Status This section is o tp ional for plans adopted locally on or before January 1, 2000 (See "Community Recreation Planning" guidelines.) However, if the community has completed one of more of the steps listed below, provide a brief description of the steps that have been taken in the Comments column. IMPORTANT. Compliance with state and federal barrier free laws and regulations is required regardless of whether the Plan addresses these issues or not. a. Evaluation of Accessibility of existing facilities X - b. Evaluation of Accessibility of existing programs X c. Completion of a transition plan to address identified accessibility issues X d. Implementation of Methods to Address Barrier -free issues in the design and planning of new facilities and programs X e. Accessibility issues at existing facilities addressed. X E. ACTION PROGRAM, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE AND RATIONALE: 1. Action Program X 2. Capital Improvement Schedule a. Estimated Costs (by action/project and total by year) X X See also Appendix E+F 91 b. Years actions will be undertaken X See also Appendix E+F c. Funding Sources X See also Appendix E+F d. Map showing location of proposed actions/projects X See also A endix H s_ Rationale for Action Prociram and Capital Improvement Schedule X Continued next page »»»»»»»> ii PR 1924.1 (01128/1995 Plans must be adopted by the governing body (i.e., city council, county commission, township board). If planning is the responsibility of a Planning Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, Recreation Advisory Board or other local Board or Commission, the Plan must also include a resolution from the Board or Commission recommending adoption of the plan by the governing body. All plans must be submitted by the local government to both the County and Regional Planning Agency for their information and iocumentation that this was done must be submitted with the plan to the DNR. Indicate that all of the required documents are included in the application (with a "✓" ) and the date of these documents: APPROVAL DOCUMENTATION Enclosed N.A. with Plan I. Official Resolution of adoption by governing body dated: 2/14/00 I - X 12 C- 11. Official resolution of the Commission or Board, recommending - adoption of the amendment by the governing body, dated: III. Copy of letter transmitting adopted plan to Coun Planning Agency dated: IV. Copy of letter transmitting adopted plan to Regional Planning Agency dated: 2/15/2000 X . c•Ib * For areawide plans, resolutions are required for each community. Prepare and attach a separate page certifying that resolutions are included for each local unit of government. City of Lansing Parks & Re c r e a t i o r�includes I hereby certify that the content of the recreation plan for (Local unit orGovemment) the required contents, as indicated above, and as set forth by the Department of Natural Resources and that the recreation plan was adopted by resolution of the ng body on 2 / 4 / 0 0 the Local unit of Government 2/ 1 5/on Date For areawide plans, Overall Certification must include the signature of each local unit of government. Prepare and attach a separate signature page. GRANTS MANAGEMENT SECTION FINANCIAL SERVICES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES �_: MCA,'.,-,,•r PO BOX 30425 LANSING MI 48909-7925 U%✓ Based solely on the certifications provided above, the recreation plan for LAIIII approved by the Department of Natural Resources and the named community is eligible`-fo ap through t `7v�J ate) x Section. Financial Services is of 136vemment) for Recreation Grants PR 1924.1 ;1r28/1995 iii Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Financial Services Division, Grants Management Section DNRI�' COMMUNITY RECREATION PLAN CERTIFICATION CHECKLIST FOR PLAN AMENDMENTS ONLY By Authority of. Parts19, 703 and 716 of Act 451, P.A. 1994, as amended, submission of this information is required for eligibility to apply for grants This checklist must be completed, signed and submitted with a locally- adopted community recreation plan amendment All community recreation plans amendments are required to meet the content and local approval standards as outlined in the Community Recreation Planning guidelines provided by the Department of Natural Resources and listed in this checklist. For a plan amendment to be approved by the Department of Natural Resources, it must be accompanied by this checklist, completed and signed by an authorized official of the local unit of government submitting the plan amendment. PLAN AMENDMENT CONTENT The Plan Amendment must include information listed under I and II below, and can include other information as determined by the local unit of government. For each Plan Element, indicate, that the Plan Amendment includes this information with a "✓' in the "Included in the Amendment" Column. Some subcategories of information may not pertain to all communities. For subcategories, indicate that information is included in the plan amendment with a "✓" in the "Included in the Amendment" Column or if a subcategory does not apply to the community, indicate with a "✓" in the "N.A." column and provide a brief explanation of why it does not apply in the "Comments" Column. If the "N.A." column is blacked out for a specific Plan Element that element is required and "not applicable" is not an appropriate response. PLAN AMENDMENT ELEMENT Included in COMMENTS Amendment Includin explanations for all N.A.'s I. DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS USED IN jNA DEVELOPMENT OF THE PLAN AMENDMENT:. A. Overall Description of Public Input Process B. Description of the Method Used (indicate the "✓" if Date types and dates of the methods used below) used 1. Public Hearing(s) 2. Survey(s) 3. Workshops/informational Meetings 4. Informational Letters 5. Informational Flyers 6. Telephone Calls C. Description of Planning Results II. AMENDED ACTION PROGRAM, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE AND RATIONALE: A. Amended Capital Improvement Schedule 1. Estimated Costs (by action/project and total by year) 2. Years actions will be undertaken 3. Funding Sources 4. Map showing location of proposed actions/projects B. Rationale for Amended Action Program III. OTHER ELEMENTS. If the Plan Amendment includes other updated plan elements, list and briefly describe them below. In the "Comments" Column, indicate the page numbers of the original plan that the amendment information replaces. PLAN AMENDMENT ELEMENT Included in AmendmentI COMMENTS A. B. C. Continued next page »»»»»»»> iv PR 1924.2 (01/28 1999 APPROVALPLAN AMENDMENT DOCUMENTATION Recreation Plan Amendments must be adopted by the governing body (i.e., city council, county commission, township board). If planning is the responsibility of a Planning Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, Recreation Advisory Board or other local Board or Commission, the Amendment must also include a resolution from the Board or Commission recommending adoptign of the plan by the governing body. Indicate that all of the required documents are included in the application (with a "✓") and the date of these documents: APPROVAL DOCUMENTATION Enclosed with Amendment N.A. I. Official Resolution of adoption by governing body dated: II. Official resolution of the Commission or Board, recommending adoption of the amendment by the governing body, dated: * For areawide plans, resolutions are required for each community. Prepare and attach a separate page certifying that resolutions are included for each local unit of government. OVERALL CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the content of the recreation plan amendment.for (Local Unit of Govemment) includes the required contents, as indicated above, and as set forth by the Department of Natural Resources and that the recreation plan amendment was adopted by resolution of the governing body on (Date) Authorized Official for the Local Unit of Government ' Date ' For areawide plans, Overall Certification must include the signature of each local unit of government. Prepare and attach a separate signature page. adopted'This completed checklist must be, signed and submitted with a locally- amendment to: GRANTS MANAGEMENT SECTION FINANCIAL SERVICES DIVISION MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PO BOX 30425 LANSING MI 48909-7925 - Based solely on the certifications provided above, the recreation plan amendment for (Local Unit of Government) is approved by the Department of Natural Resources. Based on DNR approval of the plan for which the amendment was made, the named community remains eligible to apply for Recreation Grants through (Date) Grants Management Section, Financial Services Division Date v PR 1924-2 (C' 23/1999) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS " The City of Lansing's Five -Year Plan, 2000-2005, was a cooperative effort by the citizens of the City of Lansing, its Parks and Recreation Department and Park Board, Mayor's Office and City Council. David C. Hollister, Mayor Marilynn Slade, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Harold Leeman, Jr. Joan Bauer Sandy Allen Louis Adado Antonio Benavides Larry Meyer Michael Murphy Carol Wood PARK BOARD MEMBERS Robert Brockwell John Pollard Wilbur D. Howard Ruth Leyrer Kris Nicholoff Judith Mohay Filice Mary James Ronald Lott PARKS AND RECREATION R. Eric Reickel, Director Phil Dorland, Deputy Director Paul Dykema, Forestry Manager Tanya Moore, Landscape Architect Dick Schaefer, Landscape Architect Steve Widder, Grounds Maintenance Manager Murdock Jemerson, Leisure Services Manager Don Ballard, Golf & Washington ice Complex Manager vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS, cont. The City of Lansing Parks and Recreation Department would like to extend its thanks to all divisions, organizations, groups and individuals of and throughout the City who contributed to the completion of this master'plan. - Special Thanks to: Robert Ford, President, Landscape Architects & Planners for chairing two focus groups. Also, we appreciate the work of Don Hamilton for his effort in generating the demographic information and census track data bank provided for the 1995-2000 Master Plan. This information will be utilized until the 2000 census information is available. COMMITTEE: Access Aquatics Athletic Facilities (Park/School) & Programs Cemeteries (Lansing Municipal) Community Centers & Senior Citizens Cultural Arts and Historical Downtown Parks Forestry (Street and Park) Golf Operations (Lansing Municipal) Infrastructure (Park & Recreation System) Natural Areas Neighborhood and City Wide Parks Neighborhood Park Programs Oak Park Maintenance Complex Potter Park and Zoo Regional Recreation Scott Art & Garden Washington Park Ice Skating Complex vii CHAIRS: Joan Lenhard Mary Winegar Tony Noyola Carol Abbott Debbie Balan Elizabeth Homer Robert Ford Paul Dykema Don Ballard Phil Dorland Clara Bratton Phil Dorland Murdock Jemerson Phil Dorland Gerry Brady Robert Ford Diane Townsend Don Ballard INTRODUCTION Mission Statement: "The mission of the Lansing Parks and Recreation Department is to enhance the quality of life through the preservation and maintenance of park lands, the provision of quality leisure time activities and the provision of special facilities which would otherwise not be available to Lansing residents. " As the twenty first century begins, the 2000-2005 Lansing Parks and Recreation Plan has been created to provide guidance for the city's park and recreation planning and development efforts into the new century. This document is a comprehensive plan developed to assist the city in providing quality parks, forestry, cemetery, golf, zoo, recreation and leisure time programs to its citizens. This plan examines the City of Lansing's existing park and recreation resources and evaluates present and potential deficiencies, opportunities and needs. This process was completed with the utilization of specific citizen input through focus groups. The plan recommends a course of action in addressing the identified deficiencies and needs, and serves to meet the requirements set by government agencies in order to qualify for grant approval allowing funding for the costs of capital improvements and land acquisitions. The format used has been established by the State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources, Grants Management Section. The plan is based on information gathered and compiled from the following sources: A. Research and pertinent information from other recreation and planning agencies including written text and statistical analysis. B. Various interviews with the Parks and Recreation staff. C. Committee reviews based on scheduled workshops with the Parks Board, Lansing citizens, focus groups, neighborhood organizations, community leaders, recreation clubs and organizations, and parks department staff. D. Open comments from the general public solicited through the Lansing State Journal, a public meeting before the Parks Board and a public hearing before the City Council. E. Data compiled from previous Recreation Plans and City Policies. Within the process ofeffective capital improvement planning, needs assessments and program reviews viii need to be conducted on a regular basis. Additionally, the service and operational levels required of a quality park system are dependent on the city providing essential financial resources. Park and Recreation Director's Comments _._ The Director commented on the Parks and Recreation Master Plan and provided comments on main operational and management issues facing the department. A number of deficiencies were identified by the Director. The lack of revenue to maintain and continue to renovate an aging system was a primary concern. The Lansing Parks system relies heavily on a one mill five year park millage. Although one mill for five years was approved by the voters in 1990 and again in 1995 at an advisory referendum and has been levied by the City Council since, the general fund allocation to the Parks and Recreation Department is maintained at the approximately the same level as in 1990. In the 1990 budget, there were no capital improvement projects, however, there are close to 1.8 million in the 2000 budget. The revenue stream prior to the millage was not enough to support the system and once the millage was initiated and passed by the voters, City Council reduced general revenues, which the department relied heavily upon. As the five year millage expires, one of the challenges faced by the department is the continuance of the millage. If authorized to appear on the August 2000 ballot, the Park Millage renewal question will compete with the Capital District Area Library millage. The future of the Lansing Parks system is highly dependent upon a third millage approval by the voters currently proposed for August of 2000. The department and administration must rely significantly on another one mill five year millage to continue at the present level of service. If the proposed 2000 millage fails, the availability of funds for matching grants will become very difficult to ascertain and the proposed schedule for capital improvements will not be realized. However, with passage of the millage, the department will make substantial progress in maintaining the existing park system and move toward renovation and development of many of the proposed facilities. Specific features and facilities that are rated high in priority include upgrading the aging neighborhood parks to an acceptable standard to remedy past under funding, continuing the development of neighborhood playgrounds known as "Project Play", and revitalizing the aging sections of the river trail, particularly in the downtown areas of the city. New sections of the River Trail that should be pursued and developed to include the trail connection along the Sycamore Creek from Potter Park Zoo to the new Ingham County, Hawk Island Park on the reclaimed Solomon Pits located at Cavanaugh and Aurelius Roads, and the segment along the Sycamore Creek from Hawk Island Park south to the Poyet Parcel being purchased by the City to connect to the new Hope Soccer Complex. Also, River Trail connections should be pursued for the segment along the Grand River from Moores Park to Grand River Park and the continuation of the northwest leg from Dietrich Park along the Grand River to Tecumseh Park and on to Grand Woods Park in Delta Township. Other priorities include, but are not limited to, redefining Potter Park Zoo via a new master plan and ix creation of regional tax base to support the zoo, renovations at Frances Park's existing gardens, historic parks like Reutter and Durant, overlooks, riverfront, and renovation and lighting of sports facilities and continuing the renovation of our historic structures like Turner -Dodge, Scott Art & Garden Center. The Department is presently working in conjunction with East Lansing to develop a master plan for Ranney Park.' This park has been underutilized and underdeveloped for a long time. The intent of the joint project with East Lansing is to identify how the park can best serve both units of government and the citizens in that area. The potential is dramatic given its location in the middle of a young population center and next to the Frandor Shopping Center. The existing park is under utilized with the primary uses as softball tournaments and winter sledding. It also provides foot access to the Frandor Shopping Center for the senior citizens and the condominium owners on the East Lansing side. The park was originally looked at as a potential revenue producing center based upon Dr. Ranney's original gift and the Ranney Trust Fund. Due to the concerns of the neighbors especially on the East Lansing side, a new approach is being taken to develop the park as a passive park in the north end and then to look at the south end as an active park with activities such as basketball courts, inline hockey and a skateboard facility. This could also have an miniature golf course. The joint effort by the two cities would highly qualify this park for grant funding if a new recreation bond grant is developed in the near future. There is also a need to reach out and cooperate with the neighboring cities, townships and counties. The City of Lansing cannot afford to continue being the regional recreation provider for all communities but is interested in participating in regional partnerships. The idea of "shared facilities" could result in greater efficiency for all, especially in areas of city-wide or regional type facilities such as; Potter Park Zoo, baseball and softball programs and facilities and the cemeteries. The Lansing School District can also be involved in this effort with shared access to school pools, auditoriums, gymnasiums, playgrounds and other athletic facilities such as a second lighted baseball diamond. Oldsmobile Park, home of the Lugnuts minor league baseball team, provides for secondary uses such as concerts. The Lansing Entertainment and Public Facilities Authority (LEPFA) operate and maintain Oldsmobile Park, the Lansing Convention Center and the City Market. LEPFA is in the process of establishing a summer music festival with the intent of utilizing the Louis F. Adado/Riverfront Park. If the event receives good public support it is anticipated that a number of physical changes and improvements maybe required at the park to support this or similar events in the future. To improve existing programs and service levels additional staff is desirable. This is especially true with the forestry and parks repair and maintenance programs. Program staff at the Community Centers, Turner/Dodge House, and Fenner Nature Center are in need of full-time clerical assistance. If programming levels at these facilities are going to expand, funding of additional part-time and full- time programmers are needed. A high priority should be given to seniors programs and for persons with disabilities. This does not exclude other programming efforts. An ADA Transition Plan was developed by the Parks Department in 1992-93. That ADA plan has been combined with this 5 year plan. The department continues to implement ADA requirements on x all new construction and will continue to upgrade existing facilities as money becomes available. Cooperation with other agencies, school districts and communities could go a long way in avoiding duplication of recreational facilities. Efforts should be taken to communicate on a regular basis with those who offer similar facilities and maximize use in order to provide optimum opportunities for the public. One of the most important things that must be taken into consideration is that the Department of Parks and Recreation must remain on the cutting edge of providing quality of life issues for the residents of the City ofLansing. The leadership of the department will have to take an innovative role and no idea should be discounted in an effort to find ways of funding the department other than from the general fund. We also must take a look at modern trends pertaining to activities such as skateboarding, joint use of facilities, and how the city might address the Washington Park Ice Complex as the Washington outdoor artificial ice rink is ending its useful life. It must be determined whether or not the slab would be rebuilt or discontinued and the indoor facility would just be used. The challenges continue and it is expected that the leadership in the City ofLansing will meet all those challenges. Xi SECTION 1 COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION The City of Lansing is primarily an urban environment with small undeveloped areas under several forms of ownership. The primary land holders of undeveloped land are the City of Lansing, Lansing School District, and the Board of Water and Light. Resources held by the City of Lansing Parks and Recreation Department include numerous acres of river frontage and wetlands. Suburbs generally encapsulate the city along its incorporated limits. Demographic Analysis LL - The statistical data included in the 1995-2000 Master Plan is again included in the 2000-2005 Master Plan. Once the 2000 census data is available this analysis will be updated. For the 1995-2000 Master Plan an intensive correlation of statistical data was undertaken using 1990 census data. An experienced planning consultant, Mr. Don Hamilton was utilized to extract statistical data for each census tract within the City of Lansing. The results targeted factors that helped define recreation needs. Factors include categories such as population, age, sex, family households, non -family households, persons living in households, group quarters, race, owner occupied, renter occupied, vacancy rate, persons per unit, value of housing stock, units occupied by race, urban versus rural population, school enrollment, education attainment, five year mobility, disabled civilian non - institutionalized persons, births, veteran status, place of birth, labor force measures, commuters, employment by age, industry, and class, income status, poverty status, housing characteristics, mortgage status and gross rents. The results gave general and specific demographic impressions and trends relative to specific park - -- - - - areas -within -the city. Each park -was then_targeted and a service range attributed to each. If a service range crossed more than one census track, references were made to all appropriate census tracts. The parks and tracts were then evaluated and cross referenced with the existing park inventories. The results were used to help identify, support and challenge recreation priorities as identified by committees. The demographic analysis will be utilized to make applications for future grants and determine specific programs and facilities. The methodology and excerpts of this 1995 Demographic Study for Lansing Parks follows on pages 1.5 - 1.14. Political Boundaries The City limits of incorporation are shown on the map on page 1.15. The City is divided into four political wards as shown on page 1.15. ' Land Use Patterns and Zoning The city has a very active and extensive Department of Planning and Neighborhood Development. The Planning Division is responsible for current development as well as proposed land use planning. 1.1 Proposed land used for all zoned areas is shown on the Proposed Land Use Maps on pages 1.16-1.19. Topography " . . „ . ,. 14. In general, there is very little grade change in elevation within the city, except for areas which lie upon the Mason Glacial Esker. The rivers and creek banks are from 0'-10' in height with a very gradual rise up from the banks. Grade changes usually do not affect the land's usability to as great an extent as the floodplain's limitations. Water Resources and Fish and Wildlife The City of Lansing is very fortunate to have both the Grand and Red Cedar Rivers, as well as Sycamore Creek, flowing through its limits as depicted on the Water Resources Map on page 1.20. The Grand River flows east into the city from the western boundary to the central region of the City, where it is joined with the Red Cedar River. The Grand River then turns and flows north through the downtown area. The river then turns again, flowing westward to exit the City. The Red Cedar River enters the city on the eastern boundary at Michigan State University flowing westward until joining the Grand River just south of the downtown area. The Sycamore Creek flows north through the southern region of the city joining the Red Cedar River at Shubel Park. The acquisition of riverfront land parcels has been an important aspect of Lansing's park planning since the early 1920's. Currently, the department maintains a 8 mile River Trail for non -motorized traffic running along the Grand and Red Cedar Rivers and interconnecting several parks. The City of Lansing and the Board of Water and Light together own over 22 of the 32 miles of river frontage within the city limits. It is the intent of the city to continue acquiring and developing riverfront land parcels for public use and enjoyment. The department also retains ownership of Fidelity Lake, located within Crego Park. Fidelity Lake was created as a borrow pit during the construction of Expressway 127 and is sufficient in size and water quality to support aquatic life and a fish population. Public access is also available to a large water filled borrow pit at Sycamore Woods, which is one of several water filled pits in that region of the city. Additionally, the department maintains a small park which provides public access to Jones Lake, a small lake in the northern region of the city. Ingham County Parks is currently constructing a regional park facility just south of Scott Woods Park, known as Hawk Island Park (formerly Solomon Gravel Pits. This property has a lake of approximately 35 acres in size. Construction plans are being developed with improvements including 1.2 beach/swimming area, picnicking, fishing, boat rentals, volleyball, hockey, ice/in-line skating, basketball, ballfields, and trails. No other major water bodies of water exist within the City with the exception of Bear Lake which is owned by Michigan State University. The city relies on its water resources, as well as the natural areas, for experiences with the natural environment and wildlife. The Grand River is used by many sportsmen and casual anglers for recreational enjoyment. Fenner Nature Center, Crego Natural Area, and Scott Woods offer excellent locations for the study of habitats. Potter Park Zoo also offers additional opportunities for habitat and animal study for both north American and world-wide habitats. Soils and Vegetation Most of the soils in Lansing are disturbed urban soils and are classified as a Marlett-Capac Association with well drained to poorly drained loamy soils. With the Grand and Red Cedar Rivers and Sycamore Creek, the city has a large ratio of land within the floodplain that is subject to periodic flooding and silting. Being a built environment, the city's vegetation is primarily that which has been planted. The park lands contain a large amount of oak, ash and maple in the drier areas with black locust, willows, box elder, and cottonwoods along the river banks. In most areas the underbrush is maintained with mowing, but a few areas do allow natural succession of vegetation. Transportation Systems The Circulation Maps illustrate the major transportation patterns within the City as prepared by the Department of Planning and Neighborhood Development and begin on pages 1.21-1.24. Buses for public transportation are owned and operated by the Capital Area Transportation Authority (CATA). The map on page 1.25 depicts the extensive bus routes available. The availability of public transportation allows many of the parks and community centers to be more accessible to residents who otherwise would have difficulty in reaching the facilities. Certain CATA facilities are equipped for the physically handicapped. Climate The climate of the area is especially pleasant, having four true seasons, modulated by the effect of the Great Lakes. The Great Lakes modify what would be normally hotter summers and colder winters. Contaminated Sites According to the 1995-2000 recreation plan, the Parks and Recreation Department had three 1.3 contaminated sites, one which had been remediated. Barb Dean Tot Lot (Garden St. Park) has been remediated, but is still being monitored. These contaminated sites are shown on a map on page 1.26. Crego Park: Crego Park has been partially remediated. The area to the east ends of the park have been remediated while the lower lying areas on the west side still hold some contamination. Barb Dean Tot Lot (Garden Street Site): The site was part of a major cleanup effort completed in mid-1994. The site will continue to be monitored by monitoring wells on -site. Construction plans were developed in early 1994 and a small neighborhood park was constructedand opened in late 1994. Paulson Park: Paulson Park is the site of an old city dump prior to many of the restrictions which currently exist in regards to contaminative substances. The ground water within the site has been further contaminated by leaching from two adjacent old industrial sites. Therefore, a composite of contaminates have been found on the site. The city is considering the sale of this site to an adjacent landfill owner. 1.4 ,... , LANSING PARK STUDY Methodology The method used to prepare this report followed two tracks: 1. The collection and reorganization of participant 1990 US Census Data; and 2. The mapping of the city parks with the 1990 census tracts overlaying them. 1990 US Census data were assembled for the City of Lansing and for all the census tracts within the city. The data were sorted and reformatted to provide the best information for park influence analysis. City-wide data were established as -the baseline. The data were then analyzed for outstanding characteristics and for unusual or unique features and any such observations were summarized by census tract. The consultants defined each city park by its size, equipment, facilities, and location as either Neighborhood, Community, or City-wide.' The parks were then plotted with the appropriate areas of influence and overlaid with a map of the census tracts. The tracts affected by the parks were identified, the data assembled, then analyzed to produce a "Park Profile Brief'. (Some parks, such as Potter Park, have a much greater geographical area of influence. However, the analysis of regional data was beyond the scope of this report.) The initial park areas of influence used in this report were as follows: Mini & Neighborhood parks, 1/2 - 1 mile radius; Community 1-2 mile radius; and City-wide. The definition established for Community parks proved to be unworkable for purposes of seriously examining the differentiating community factors for a park with the community designation. A two mile park influence radius is simply too large an area for making comparisons to the City of Lansing city-wide base values. A circle with a radius of two miles covers an area of approximately 12.6 square miles. All of Lansing is 34.1 square miles. Each Community park circle covered more than 1/3 of the land mass of the community. A Community park could easily "capture" an influence area composed of an even more disproportionate number of total residents or census tracts. For instance, the Miller Road influence circle captured 12 census tracts and slightly more than 36 percent of the city's residents. The Comstock analysis included 24 tracts and was almost 46 percent of the City's population. Aggregations of this magnitude eliminate those unique or unusual characteristics upon which to focus a particular park's development program. 1.5 As a result of these findings, the consultants examined areas surrounding each Community park which could, in their judgment, represent the physical community that would define the park area for planning purposes. The radius established for this alternative was approximately 3/4 of a mile. It represented an area that, on average, captured the influence of those four to six census tracts immediately surrounding the target park. This is a-c oser approximation- of the true area of influence for these parks. It is the area that defines their physical setting. It is the area that sets the tone for anyone traveling through the area to reach the park, and finally, the local resident population serves as the closest user base for the park. To maintain proportional integrity, the consultants also analyzed the neighborhood parks on this basis, using a one-third mile radius. Indicators for most of the elements of the "Profile Briefs" are straight forward, e.g. income and poverty indices; but some are less direct. Neighborhood stability was measured by the number of years in residency in a particular dwelling unit. Mobility was a measure of both the number of cars and the number of disabled individuals in a tract or park area. Although the logic of both, especially the latter, is somewhat tenuous, the information is valuable for planning, especially planning for areas where a higher percentage of persons have no car, or for areas with disproportionate numbers of disabled persons. The briefs were worded to provide snapshot views of the tracts and park influence areas. When an area of concern or interest is established, the users should refer to the base data for a more complete analysis. Also, no attempt was made to analyze the data in terms of state of national norms. All comparisons are to Lansing City census data. 'Standards taken or derived from National Recreation and Parks Association, Recreating Park & QWn Space Standards & Guidelines 1983: The Athletic Institute, Plannine Areas & Facilities for Health, Physical Education & Recreation, 1966: and other sources. W-1 x CITY-WIDE BASELINE STATISTICS The following is a synopsis of the Lansing City census data' against which all the data of the tracts and parks were compared: 1. POPULATION - 5.2 % more females than males 2. HOUSEHOLDS - median age 29.7 Married couples households 42.0% Non -family households 37.9 % Single -parent households 20.1 % 3. RACIAL MIX - whites/blacks 92.5 % White 73.9 % Black 18.6 % All other 7.5 % Hispanic origin 7.9 % 4. HOUSING - Overall Housing Utilization Vacant housing 6.1 % Occupied housing 93.9 % Owner occupied 51.4 % Single-family housing is 66.8 % of total Occupancy by Race: Whites 2.36 persons/household Blacks 2.92 American Indian/Aleut 3.15 Asian/Pacific Isl. 4.12 Other 3.59 Hispanic 3.60 Complete city-wide census profile statistics are found at Tab 4 1.7 4: HOUSING - continued Structures Average units constructed during decade 1940-1980: 8,618 Units constructed during 1980's:. - 4,957 Neighborhood Stability 56 % of residents moved into their home since 1985 69 % of residents moved into their home since 1980 (The movement rate since 1985 is the equivalent of everyone moving approximately once every 9 years) Miscellaneous 5.7 % of households have no phone 13.3 % of households have no car 1/3 of homeowners have no mortgage Housing costs as % of household income 14.7 % of homeowners pay more than 30 % of household income 41.2 % of renters pay more than 30 % of household income 5. EDUCATION 29.7 % of residents are in school - and 34.7 % of those are in college. This means that 1 in 10 residents of Lansing is a college student. 21.7 % of residents age 25 + never graduated from high school: 18.4 % graduated from college with a BA or advanced degree 6. DISABILITIES - (non -institutionalized persons) Age 16-64: 1 in 18 ( 5.5 %) with personal disability Age 16-64: 1 in 10 (10.7%) with work disability Age 65+: 3 in 13 (23.0%) with personal disability Age 65+: 2 in 11 (18.1 %) have mobility disability 7. PLACE OF BIRTH Only 3.1 % born outside the U.S., but of those, 41.2% came to Lansing during the 1980's 1.8 8 ! . W- �.1. ..l ...W 1. ..W....a .:a Y�iwa..•.�:y tee.... . .. ., ... e i ' .. � -_ ...i e CHILDREN . City had 34,912 children under age 18 - (27.4% of total population) Children under age six: 60.3 % of mothers are in the labor force. In 57.2 % of families with children under six all - parents work. - - For children between six and seventeen: 75.3 % of mothers are in the labor force. In 67.4 % of these families, all parents work. Teenagers: city-wide, 548 (8.3 %) of all persons age 16-19 are not in school, have not graduated, and are unemployed (or are not in the labor force) Children and poverty: See section 10 below 9. LABOR FORCE 2/3 white collar workers; 1/3 blue collar Rank of employers by % of workers Retail trade 19.1 % Manufacturing (durable goods) 11.6 % Public administration 11.4 % Educational services 10.0 % Health occupations 7.7 % 59.8 % Overall 69 % of persons age 16+ are in the labor force and 31 % are not. For men a little higher; women a little lower. 10. INCOME / POVERTY Per Capita Income: $12,232 Percentage in poverty: All ages: 19.4 % Age 65 + 11.4 % Children age 5-17 25.2% Children under 5 29.9 % w/Female head of household: Children age 5-17 53.2 % Children under 5 66.0 % 1.9 LANSING 1990 CENSUS; .TRACTS . . 33.01 32 31.02 33.02 1 ----------- I _ 34 8 --- ' 5 7 31.0 3d.01 4 .6 10 13 65 _ 140 35 14 * ----, -• 16 15 19 12 _ f 21 "�;fi7.01 20 ---� 24 22 17.02 25 23 26 29.01 44.01 ►----• . , I ;r' i %202.02 36.01 36 I._._._._.-._._. 214 51 52.02 37 27 52.01 1 53.03 55.01 1.10 29.02 53.Q4 _ .� 53.02 It_ . 0 I.Vi1 �RCC ,Tm NORTH mw%..r— LANSING PARK STUDY: PARK LIST PARK NAME ADADO-RIVERFRONT DESIGNATTO _ CITY WIDE ATTWOOD COMMUNITY AVERILL NEIGHBORHOOD BANCROFT COMMUNITY BARB DEAN TOT LOT NEIGHBORHOOD BASSETT NEIGHBORHOOD BECK NEIGHBORHOOD BLUEBELL NEIGHBORHOOD BUCHARD CITY WIDE CAESAR-DONORA NEIGHBORHOOD CAVANAUGH COMMUNITY CHERRY HILL CITY WIDE CLIFFORD NEIGHBORHOOD COMSTOCK COMMUNITY COOLEY CITY WIDE CREGO COMMUNITY DAVIS CITY WIDE DIETRICH CITY WIDE DUNNEBACKE NEIGHBORHOOD DURANT COMMUNITY EDMORE NEIGHBORHOOD ELM CITY WIDE ELMHURST NEIGHBORHOOD EVERETT COMMUNITY FAIRVIEW NEIGHBORHOOD FENNER CITY WIDE FERRIS NEIGHBORHOOD FILLEY NEIGHBORHOOD FINE COMMUNITY FOREST VIEW NEIGHBORHOOD FORSTER C.0 COMMUNITY FOSTER NEIGHBORHOOD FRANCES CITY WIDE FULTON COMMUNITY GEORGETOWN NEIGHBORHOOD GIER C.0 CITY WIDE GLEN EDEN NEIGHBORHOOD GRAND RIVER ..._... �� GRAND WOODS GRAVES GREENCROFT HILLBORN HILLSDALE HOLLY HORSEBROOK HULL COURT HUNTER INGHAM IRVING JONES LAKE KALAMAZOO PLAZA KAYNORTH KENDON KIM 3ERLY KINGSLEY KIRCHER MUNICIPAL LARCH LEWTON LYONS MARSCOT MARSHALL MC KINCH MICHIGAN AVE MILLER ROAD C.C. MOORES MUNN OAK 119TH ARMORY ORMOND OSBORN PLEASANT VIEW PORTER POTTER PDXSON QUENTIN RANNEY REASONER REGENT REOLA REUTTER 1.12 CITY WIDE COMMUNITY NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOOD NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY CITY WIDE NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY NEIGHBORHOOD CITY WIDE COMMUNITY COMMUNITY NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY NEIGHBORHOOD CITY WIDE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY CITY WIDE NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY RISDALE RIVERPOINT RIVERSIDE ST.JOSEPH SCOTT CENTER SCOTT WOODS_ .. _ SEVENTH SHUBLE STABLER STROUD SUNSET HILLS SYCAMORE TAMMANY TECUMSEH TRAGER 'TURNER -DODGE WAINWRIGHT WALDO WALSH WASHINGTON WENTWORTH WEST SIDE WILLOUGHBY WILSON WOODCREEK 1.13 COMMUNITY COMMUNITY NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY CITY WIDE CITY WIDE NEIGHBORHOOD CITY WIDE NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD CITY WIDE NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD CITY WIDE COMMUNITY COMMUNITY NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD =MUM Mnm:Mn-.�� MWF�I!M-q -z.,-...,.-n. FIR vim Iniiilliffill 11 orlmmir-mma udm ..... ........ Al AS Hai. BE BE ANY Fi rl OLL roo IULT PA E CITY OF LANSING PARCEk oil - l.15 - rn .-T; A -Al 4V Pik J` ---------- - . . . ..... r.ze... .. A. d-L IL-5 ---- - ---- ji 9 ..... .... M -7 .................. L ... ... ....... ........... ............. X: .. 11 ...... . ar -N M.- EN: RESIDEW O RESIDE': :,: RIC RESIDE':-*- E-1 RESIDENT 8: r--71 PROFESS 0==I'-E COMM - C-L - PARKS .0-:'- SPL:E:C-METARY UTILITIES 9= LIGHT INC-S-RIA- WM HEAVY It,: -'ZTRI;.. ------- F-- Comp'lut.— cfc*-`IEE mIXE()US_ JLPTJ r-'--1 WAREHOI.:Er RE'r-: -RC- PARK S SPECIAL Lt- USES .............. ..... PROPOSED LAND USE SOUTHEAST AREA COMPREHENSIVE I o1z D EL 0 P i EE t \1 T P L A N" 1.17 SOUTHWEST AREA COt'PREHENSIVE'DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROPOSED LAND USE C= qfsnxml,m 0 ? fti—, r—n ISME"M ?"' 0"" *ES"NTIAL 1"20 d"'c'- -47 REMNTIAL 20- WWI- D1 II OPF. SpAa OVMUMIY PACILITIES 0 1, C-1-CE UVILMES r C0"EACIAL .CvslRw .-KHOUS"G &W-77, .AJON ARIP.-t ufw)q "ITERLAL SMLECTOR tOCAL INS Jj rc:z_ Ell vn L 0, IUL L------- LI South West Area CTTY OF LANSING NICFGGAN 1.18 O tcy. Mw.w. lmw1 'S".-Cmt, W%op.,.t KVW- lot—'s pg. ml cottIctrwn st"Iff C- -3 =1 ochl-ow., 0 .. cc "J VA,AA .. 0.1. i;-Act .— . - I I [:.--j PA"Wn � I — - — - . I . - River Islond Arao Comprehensive, Plon PROPOSED LAND USE 1.19 RAI dtJONES LAKE ig�V4RSE ON GOA hill if LB GRAND CREGO F .,,FIDELITY OTT 1.20 to j. Jr 1 ,i r J •• - .. r `•',` .., 1. ail j!=� { I r-rl_ _�' ! _I •I I r ! - ✓` 'i; t �!— � 4• ;, �r i' � '� ; 1__ t ! it �. �`_ _ ,I, s am ice. f�... i. ;.........»�n...:.....lt _ r. ..................... . 10 r' � 4: , �� rllr „RTERI_- Co' _TONS MPROVEV Yy.YWYWI CIRCULATION 2 SOUTHEAST AREA COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1.22 SOUTHWEE- AREA COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN CIRCULATION � "`111YYY 11001 !�• may:: � I•� /t ii APT COLLE jgll /: • ,I Jr, _ _� t .:: .- _. ��,; • ouECTr+e j 11�Ii WIERSECTid+ W:eOVEYEMTS / �..s% rl=; L�_ • --1 + , IL t �1lL- 1F 1 ; f •` � �� �... �I`�.il I' j �I_�- jam` �I � � T T � s `�•�!' � F'; l SI i �'� � (�� � `;� � 1 i� ' ��� ice.._ 3 jr lilt r- 511 —41 IL i `I 1 `•mil 1 1 1 South West Area CITY CF LA!. -,RAG kMCW-AN J a•.• ...• 1.23 a1p)t/�T1p. M.TIIM �� • CO1l.C1DR.TMCT �� r10•Yt1111�► WAJC- WON" 9. ;over IslOtvj Area � (olrlOrehenslvg Plan .CIRCULATION` 4 1.24 OUIIT Tum IIMIMTT.D O nu►nc /OMnI TIITM em.M APOM 1 DMICTIpil.1011. G` 'm PMU TIIYIIC won TWIIC OMII1T.11 .4w am PRO -VT T119I90II0 TWIM; _- • •DO MOT twirm. 94 I.Y. 14"'.IOM. ® 11[M0T. TTIYTIC.101M41 FFRANCE IU j Y04 1 pp JL— al af vl t `4 OR 14, CITY OF LANSING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 40" H POTTER CREGO Li .-SORETUM EVERWE I I 'E 'EYE [3 CEMETEP Y i F F A.Y COTT v e IRCEL 3 1.25 �k Ii!j �I ..... �- . ..... . ............... . ..... ... . ....... . . it it 7:17 it 7- -lot 7r 2iEJzit I L ..wd N... 1PAULSONZ 1�E0r i �s>, �^.eil.7 ll!'" v '�. L�gs a,, E li a• -`�? s'Gf��.. �k „�' - _. ����.�.,�'�, � � .'l I F j icy. 17 F( _d J"11 J )u c r8A kQM2> wE. I W.VERLY 01! t O.f 1W , R E ft I AR �0 _ M MIN -4,/i' wo! BARB DEAN AOt V. ..... 7 LEWTON TOT LOT 'i /j S,_Jo HE I.J OLL . . . . . . . . . . 7 (=11,_ Wi _PP FUL n IL -j "Z, i .5 AL la BLuE 3 xz Ll.1: ILI L zt CITY OF LANDING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NORTH J POTTER CREGO E FENNER AR a ORETUM EVERGREEN CEMETERY T N O CEME1 r en T-Y 1i F.. 1.26 SECTION 2 COMMUNITY ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE COMMUNITY ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE Operating Budget The Parks and Recreation Department's operating budget is funded through the general fund and three enterprise funds set up for the Golf, Cemetery and Potter Park/Zoo operations. The Golf, Cemetery and Potter Park/Zoo operations are currently supported with a general fund contribution *to cover operating and capital costs. Service and program fees are charged to offset the general fund appropriations. Infrastructure Budget The capital improvement projects for the Parks and Recreation Department are funded in the cities infrastructure budget. The City of Lansing's definition of capital improvement project is a project that has a useful life of at least ten years and costs no less than $15,000. Capital improvement projects must meet accounting definitions for items that can be capitalized. Generally professional services which are not a part of a specific "brick and mortar" project do not meet this definition. Free-standing equipment is not considered to be a capital improvement. Federal and State grant sources are sometimes available to leverage our local tax dollars: When the City is notified that grant applications are being accepted a decision must be made whether or not to apply. Different agencies have different guidelines, time tables for submission, local match requirements and approval processes. The Parks and Recreation Director evaluates available grant opportunities in relationship to projects included in the Five Year Master Plan and submits his/her recommendation to the Park Board. The Park Board's recommendation is then forwarded to the Mayor who determines if the application should be sent to the City Council for their action. The City Council Grants Policy (Resolution 357 of 11/23/98) states "Any grant shall be subject to the same budgetary policies required of other City expenditures as required in Sections 7-107 through 7-110 of the City Charter. Applications for grants requiring the addition of City staff, or a City match of $10,000 or more, or exceeding $100,000, or exceeding one year in length shall require a financial impact statement and approval of the City Council. Any grant funded position shall terminate upon the expiration or elimination of grant funding. No grant, which is subject to these provisions shall be accepted without the approval of the City Council." Capital improvements projects may be selected from the Parks and Recreation Department's "Master Projects" list for consideration in the city's budget process separate from any grant consideration. Typically the Parks and Recreation Director suggests projects to the Park Board at their November meeting and asks for a recommendation to coincide with the Mayor's budget recommendations to City Council. The department's budget is submitted to the Budget office at the beginning of the calendar year. The capital improvement projects are prioritized by a committee representing various city departments who have submitted projects, budget staff, the Finance Director and the Mayor's Executive Assistant. Each capital improvement project is rated on a priority system that was approved by the City Council with the FY 1994-1995 budget. The Mayor's budget by City Charter has to be submitted to the City Council by the fourth Monday in March. The Capital Improvements 2.1 recommended by the Mayor appear in the budget section titled " Infrastructure." The City Council holds a number of meetings and a public hearing to review the budget. The City Charter requires the City Council to adopt a budget by the third Monday in May. In 1990 and again in 1995 the Lansing voters, at an advisory referendum, approved one mill for operation of the city's parks and recreation system for five year time periods.' This mill has been levied by the City Council since 1990 to allow renovation and development of Lansing park facilities. Fiscal year 2001 will be the last year to levy this one mill unless it is sent back for another referendum vote or the Mayor and City Council decide to continue the one mill within the cities taxing authority. The Mayor's operating and infrastructure -budget for the Parks and Recreation Department for fiscal year July 1,1999 through June 30, 2000 is shown on pages 2.12-2.17. At the time of the preparation of this plan no substantial increases or decreases were expected in the operating budgets. Currently DNR grants are not available to address most of the repair and maintenance needs or the program and operational needs of the Parks and Recreation Department. Therefore, it is up to the City to determine how to address these needs through the general fund. Organizational Chart: The Parks and Recreation Department organizational chart is provided in the table on page 2.18. Standard Operating Procedures: The following describes the city's organizational structure, the chain of command, the department's relationship with the Park Board and various citizen advisory boards. Charter of the City of Lansing: The Charter of the City of Lansing, Michigan, was approved by the voters on August 8, 1978. Article 1, Chapter 1, Section 101 states "The people of the City of Lansing, by adoption of this home rule Charter, create and continue a body corporate known as the `City of Lansing' and provide for continuing control of their municipal corporation." Section 403.6 of the Charter states "No park, recreation, cemetery, or waterfront land may be sold without the approval, by a majority vote, of the electors of the city voting on the question at a regular or special election." City Council: The City Council is comprised of eight members serving four year terms, whereby four members represent individual political wards and four members are elected at large. Below is a list of each of the members. 2.2 COUNCIL MEMBERS 1 st Ward Harold Leeman, Jr. _2nd Ward. Sandy Allen 3rd Ward Antonio Benavides 4th Ward Michael Murphy At Large Louis Adado At Large Joan Bauer At Large Larry Meyer At Large. _ _ ..Carol Wood The City Council is policy making in form, with the authority identified as that of determining city policy by the passage of resolutions and ordinances and final adoption of the city budget. Executive Branch: Article 4 of the City Charter establishes the executive branch ofgovernment. The Charter establishes the Mayor as the chief executive officer of the City of Lansing. The Mayor is responsible for the implementation and administration of city policy. The Mayor is elected every four years. The office is currently held by Mayor David C. Hollister, who was elected in November of 1993 to serve from 1994-1997and again in 1997 to serve from 1998-2001. Ordinances and City Council policy resolutions: The City Charter under Article 8, Section 403 requires the city to adopt procedures by ordinance to protect the interests of the city and to assure fairness and consistency in the acquisition and disposition of interests in real property. Chapter 208 of the City Ordinances was adopted to comply with the City Charter requirements. Section 10-a of the chapter states that "No park, recreation, cemetery or waterfront shall be sold without the approval, by a majority vote , of the electors of the City voting on the question at a regular or special election `Waterfront" means an area of both land and water related to the Grand River, the Red Cedar River and Sycamore Creek within the City. The area of land shall be a strip of land, on both banks of the water body, bounded by the normal water's edge and a line twenty-five feet, horizontal measure, from and paralleling such edge. The area of water shall be the width of the river or creek itself, i.e., the area across the body of water from normal waters's edge shall be determined from the most recent topographic maps of the City that are on file in the Department of Planning and Municipal Development and the in Public Service Department. Section 10-b of the chapter states "The Mayor shall cause to be prepared a written inventory of all real property provided for in subsection (a) hereof. Such inventory shall be prepared and filed with the City Clerk and Council within one year of the effective date of this chapter (Ordinance 539, passed June 12, 1979). As real property is acquired, the Mayor shall designate whether or not it shall be added to the written inventory." December 10, 1979 the City Council adopted a Park Land Policy dealing with acquisition, development, encroachment and disposal. The policy, as amended, reads as follows: 2.3 By committee on PUBLIC PROPERTIES AND SAFETY - Resolved by the City Council of the City of Lansing Whereas, the City of Lansing's park land acquisition and development program has been based on the Parks and Recreation Department's "Land Policy," adopted in 1961; and Whereas, this land policy concerns the four areas of acquisition, development, encroachment, and disposal; and Whereas, the City Council, through its Committee on Public Properties and Safety, has researched this matter, conducted public hearings, and formulated a comprehensive statement of policy for current and future use by the Administration: Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved the Lansing City Council does hereby adopt the following -as Park Land Policy: 1) Acquisition: The Parks and Recreation Department, working in cooperation with the Parks Board, the Planning Board, the Board of Education and interested citizen groups, may study the recreational land needs, and shall prepare an annual report describing the projection of such needs. This report shall be submitted to the Lansing City Council. The Council may request that specific acquisition projects be included for their future consideration as part of their budget review process. Properties identified in the Recreational Land Needs Study should be classified as being either a current park land need, or a projected park land need. Properties included in either category should be the result of complete analysis of the existing and the projected physical and population development of the Greater Lansing Area. Property acquisition will be conducted in accordance with provision of the City Charter and existing ordinances relating to land acquisition, and shall include, by action ofthe City Council, the designation that the property is acquired specifically for Park Land. 2) Development: The Parks and Recreation Department will be responsible for the development and the maintenance of a Park Development Capital Improvement Plan. This plan shall be incorporated into the Capital Improvement Plan for the City of Lansing which addresses the overall needs of the city. Proposed park development projects will be submitted by the Department of Parks and Recreation through the Planning Board to the Mayor or his designee as part of the annual budget process, and shall include a maintenance and operation impact statement for all improvements identified in a CIP (capital improvement project) budget request. The City Council requests that the Parks and Recreation Department, working in cooperation with the Planning Department, shall submit to the City Council for review and action, a plan which classifies all park areas managed by the City of Lansing. Such classification shall identify each park area as being either for neighborhood, community, city, regional or other appropriate titled use, and shall further designate it as Park Land. 3) Encroachment: 2.4 The Parks and Recreation Department and the City of Lansing must preserve and defend park lands, including those classified as being held for projected park needs, from encroachment by public or private uses. Any request for alienation of park land should be considered in terms of the long-range good for the people of the City of Lansing. 4) Disposal: The object of any such sale or transfer should be with the purpose of improving the park system of the City of Lansing and not be for the benefit of private development or interest. Such proposed disposal should be reviewed by the Park Board and the Planning Board who shall submit recommendations to the Mayor. These recommendation, along with that of the Mayor, must be received by City Council prior to any action being taken by the Council in regard to the proposed disposal. Areas designated as Park Land shall not be disposed of in any form, except under the provision of the Lansing City Charter, Section 8-403.6. A) Disposal of Park Land for Another Public Purpose: When park land must be taken for another public use, such as a highway, fire station, or for any other reason in the public interest, the City of Lansing shall insure the recreation services to the people served by the park shall not be diminished. It shall be the policy of the City of Lansing that park land shall be surrendered for a legitimate public use only after a plan is developed and adopted by the City Council for replacement ofthe park land and recreation services, giving weight to the area from which the land is being taken. The Replacement Plan shall include identification of the people served by the park, basic functions to be maintained, acreage and facilities needed, and financial impact. If land is transferred to another City Department, a fund transfer crediting an amount equal to the fair market value of said land. shall be presented to City Council forthwith for park land acquisition as part of this replacement policy. These actions assure the people of the City of Lansing that minimum park acreage will be maintained as demands for community services increase. B) Disposal of Park Land Unsuitable for Park Development: If a certain piece of park land should become unsuitable for park/recreation use, the City shall provide for its disposal through the exchange for more suitable land if possible. When exchange is not feasible or beneficial, such property may be sold and a transfer of the funds from disposal to an amount for - park land acquisition or for suitable development projects shall be presented forthwith for City Council for approval; and n' Be It Further Resolved that all previously adopted policies inconsistent with the provisions hereof are hereby rescinded. In keeping with the Park Land Policy, on June 22, 1981 the City Council adopted a resolution classifying City properties designated as park land as either neighborhood parks, community parks, 2.5 city wide parks or special use parks. The resolution also listed the year acquired and the number of acres of each park. City ordinance states that the Mayor shall designate whether or not property acquired shall be added to the written inventory. The Park Board,, when advising the Mayor on acquisitions, needs to recommend whether or not the acquisition should be dedicated as park land and recommend a classification for the acquisition. Advisory Park Board: The department is assisted by a citizen based Park Board which serves the department in an advisory capacity. Members of the Park Board are appointed to four year terms by the Mayor and approved by City Council as provided for under Article 5, Chapter l of the City Charter. The Park Board meets the third Wednesday of the month at various park facility locations. Current members of the board are as follows: PARK BOARD MEMBERS 1 st Ward Ruth Leyrer 2nd Ward Wilbur D. Howard 3rd Ward Ronald Lott 4th Ward Mary James At Large Kris T. Nicholoff At Large John Pollard At Large Robert Brockwell At Large Judith Mohay Filice The Park Board is advisory in nature. Regular monthly meetings are held to review the progress and concerns of the department and to ensure that all activities are in accordance with accepted city policy. The board itself may propose changes in the department's operations for the purpose of making the department or program more effective. Proposed policies and programs, or changes in existing policies or programs requiring Council action must be submitted by the department Director to the Park Board prior to submission to the Mayor and Council for action. The board in turn submits written recommendations concerning the proposals to the Mayor, along with the department's proposal. When the Mayor submits the proposal to Council for action, the board's recommendations are also forwarded. This same procedure is followed with regard to budgetary matters. Each year, prior to December 1 st, the board is required to prepare a written report evaluating the effectiveness of services and analyzing the status of priorities for services and activities of the department. RELATIONSHIPS WITH OTHER AGENCIES River & Waterfront Development Board: The Waterfront Development Board was created by City Council ordinance to oversee implementation of the waterfront plan. The plan encourages increased uses of public areas and development projects that use the waterfront as a focal point. This Board has been inactive in -recent years. It should be revitalized, or other arrangements should be made to ensure that the purpose of this Board is fulfilled. 2.6 Citizen Advisory Groups: The department is also assisted by a number of citizen advisory groups. These groups are specific to a particular facility or recreational activity. These groups act -as an advocate for their,specific area in the program planning and budgetary process. They provide many hours of volunteer support, as well as funding for many development projects and equipment at the facilities. The size and membership of these groups vary from a few to several hundred. Each has established its own set of by-laws and several of the groups operate as non-profit corporations. The current support groups are as follows: Baseball Advisory Board: Special concerns are baseball facilities, leagues, tournaments and the operation of concessions used to fund special recreational baseball projects. Friends of Cooley Gardens: Support and participate in the continued renovation of the Cooley Gardens including funding and volunteer labor. Friends of Durant Park, Inc.: Mission Statement: Inspire interest and appreciation of Durant Park as a historical Lansing resource and viable public space serving the needs of the community. Friends of Fenner Nature Center: Support the Fenner facilities and programs through volunteer support of special events, special development projects, and advisory opinions on the Nature Center's growth and use. Friends of the River: Support continued river front property acquisition by the department, cleanup of the river banks and rivers, and advise concerning development within the flood plain. Scott Art and Garden Center Advisory Board: Comprised of members of the numerous clubs which utilize the Scott House for meetings. The Friends recommend usages for the building and support continued restoration of the building and grounds. Friends of Turner -Dodge House: " Members provide a volunteer base for special events, advise on and support the continued renovation of the historic site, and provide project funding for various renovation efforts. Foster Center Advisory Board: Provide advisement concerning the programming of the Foster Community Center as well as provide financial support for needed program materials. Gier Center Advisory Board: Provide advisement concerning the programming of the Gier Community Center as well as provide financial support for needed program materials. 2.7 Historic District Commission: Works to provide recognition, preservation and protection of historical and architectural sites, buildings, structures, objects, open spaces and features. Historical Society of Greater Lansing: Provides resources, through donations of funds and historical materials, to the local history room at the Capital Area District Library. Letts Center Advisory Board: Provide advisement concerning the programming of the Letts Community Center as well as provide financial support for needed program materials. Potter Park Zoological Society: Provide volunteer and monetary support for special events, provide educational programs, and provide funding for improvements through concession sales and private donations. Softball Advisory Board: Supports the Softball sports programs through advisement and fund raising for softball equipment and facilities. Adopt -A -Park: In 1999, the Lansing Parks and Recreation Department formalized its park adoption process with a program called Adopt -A -Park. Lansing residents are encouraged to volunteer their efforts in a number of ways to enhance our park system including but not limited to: trash pickup, playground maintenance, flower beds, etc. For their efforts, volunteers are recognized with a certificate and sign in the park or public area they have adopted. Volunteers: Currently the department staff is supplemented by volunteer help in all areas of recreational planning and programming. Below are a few examples of the contributions volunteers make to the department. Providing special program opportunities free of charge. Coaches for the various sports programs. Historical interpreters provide tours of the Turner -Dodge House. Supervision and assistance help at the community centers and in various programs. Assistance with children and adults in handicapper programs. Student Interns in various recreational areas. Maintenance volunteer help maintain park facilities. 2.8 Special Events involve volunteers as judges, performers, -medical help, schedulers and workers. Volunteer veterinary care for the zoo animals and assistance at special events are provided by Michigan State University interns and volunteers. Lansing School District Relationship: Departmental property abuts many ofthe Lansing Schools leading to a school/park relationship which are depicted on the plan on page 4.14. The schools also use many of the park facilities of school athletic functions. The department's athletic and summer programming often use school facilities as well. In 1996 the school district turned over their enrichment and public aquatics programs for the Parks and Recreation Department to run. Currently the relationship between the city and the Lansing School District is being strengthened in hopes of improving integration between the school district's numerous facilities and the department's programming abilities. Close integration and cooperation can prevent the duplication of facilities to allow both organizations to better serve the Lansing residents. Staff Description: The Parks and Recreation Department, established by Section 4-305 of the City Charter, is responsible for the care, programming, and future planning of its many facilities and land holdings. These responsibilities are accomplished through the administration of a sizable full and part-time staff under the direction of the Director of Parks and Recreation. The Director accomplishes these tasks by the direction given from the Mayor in regard to carrying out the various city ordinances and policies. In addition, the department receives funding from various Federal and State of Michigan grant funds, State of Michigan Equity Funds, minor trust funds, land sales and donations. These amounts vary from year to year. Department Divisions: The Parks and Recreation Department is organized under five divisions which are Administration, Field Services, Leisure and Special Recreation Services, Potter Park/Zoo and Golf/Washington Ice Complex. The Administration Division is responsible for providing office management, clerical, personnel services, finance, purchasing, administration of the cemeteries and equipment maintenance and security. In addition, Park Design & Research is responsible for new construction projects, repair and maintenance projects, master plans and other landscape architectural related duties. Administration and planning for park land acquisition, disposal and development is the responsibility of the Director who is aided by the Park Design and Research staff. The design office is responsible for administration of all capital development, grant writing, facility master planning and expenditure of development funds. The Field Services Division, comprised of the Grounds & Landscape Maintenance Section and the Forestry Section, is responsible for the year round maintenance of all park lands and publicly owned 2.9 trees. Work by Grounds & Landscape Maintenance often includes mowing, leaf removal, snow removal, trash pickup, and set-up of special events. Grounds & Landscape Maintenance is also responsible for the maintenance of the three cemeteries. The Forestry Section is responsible for the care of the city's publicly owned trees including the street tree program as well as all trees located on city park lands. Responsibilities include the maintenance of tree nurseries, planting, maintenance, pruning and removal. Programming of the various facilities is the responsibility of the Leisure and Special Recreation Services Division. This division is responsible for the staffing and programming three community - centers, scheduling and administering life time and competitive sports, special services such as handicapper programs, Miller Road senior programs, classes and special events. The division is also responsible for the operation of Fenner Nature Center and the historic Turner -Dodge House. Potter Park/Zoo Division is responsible for housing and exhibiting of approximately 400 exotic animals. Staff provide for the acquisition, display and health of the animal collection in compliance with the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Department of Interior State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the American Zoo and Aquarium Association (AZA) accreditation standards. Facilities and services are maintained for an average of 2,300 visitors daily during peak season. The Golf/Washington Ice Complex Division operates and maintains four municipal golf courses totaling 45 holes and an outdoor artificial ice rink. More than 140,000 rounds of golf are played annually and more than 20,000 skaters skate at the ice rink each winter. Departmental Staffing: Staffing for the department is comprised of permanent full time employees, permanent part-time employees, seasonal laborers and part-time contract employees.' The city offered an early retirement program in 1992. Since that time the City Council has been reluctant to add new positions to the city's table of organization. No current changes in staffing numbers are expected. The department is aided yearly by literally hundreds of volunteers. 2.10 - Type and Number of Employees by Funding Source General Potter Park/ Cemetery Golf Position Summary Fund Zoo Fund Fund Fund TOTAL Full Time Executive 1.0 1.0 Exempt 2.0 2.0 Teamster 214-Supv. 2.3 0.7 3.0 Teamster 580-Supv. 23.9 1.0 2.1 27.0 Teamster 580-Clerical, Technical & Professional 10.0 1.0 1.0 12.0 Teamster 580-CTP Part-time 1.0 1.0 UAW 54.8 16.0 5.0 4.2 80.0 TOTAL 97.0 18.0 6.0 7.0 126.0 Seasonal and Part-time UAW Seasonal 37.0 3.0 9.0 10.0 59.0 UAW Part-time 3.0 1.0 4.0 Part-time contract 450.0± 13.0 18.0 481.0 TOTAL 490.0 17.0 9.0 28.0 544.0 2.11 PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT APPROPRIATION FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 99-2000 (Memo Detail) ACTUAL NET BUDGET MAYOR'S 12/31/99 RECOMMENDED BUDGET Personnel $4,014,040 $4.507,694 $4.554.789 Operating Expenses 1.279.240 1.331,398 1,220.760 Capital Items 307.116 327,942 267.255 Debt Service 0 0 0 Operating Transfers (1) DEPARTMENT APPROPRIATION $5,600,396 $6,167,034 $6,042,804 Estimated Benefits $2,224,048 $2,465.974 $2,536,081 (General Administration) ESTIMATED TOTAL DEPARTMENT BUDGET S7,824 444 $8 633,008 $8,578,885 % change FY99 to FY 2000 1.04% 4.31 % -18.51% -2.01 % 11. SUMMARY OF CHANGES A. Added after -school pilot program at Gardner Middle School M-Th 2:30 - 6:00 pm B Deleted Natural Ice skating service. C. Donation -supported programs shown as zero revenues, zero expense; to be appropriated as donations and any related fees come in. IIL . POSITION SUMMARY (Memo Detail) A. FULL TIME 1. EXECUTIVE 2. EXEMPT 3. TEAMSTER 214 4. TEAMSTER 580 5. UAW TOTAL Q. PART-TIME , , 1. UAW SEASONAL 2. UAW PART-TIME 3. TEAMSTER PART-TIME FY98 FY99 FY2000 ACTUAL BUDGET PROPOSED 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.30 • 2.30 2.30 34.90 35.90 35.90 96M 26.00 � 37 37 37 3 3 3 2 2 2 (1) Operating Transfers shown as revenues in the Enterprise Fund Fiscal Summaries (following pages). 2.12 Potter Park Zoo Fund 1. APPROPRIATIONS FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 2000 % change (Memo Detail) ACTUAL NET BUDGET MAYOR'S FY 2000 to FY99 06130/98 12131199.• RECOMMENDED BUDGET Personnel' $586,843 $628,660 $656.119 4.37% Employee Benefits 415.412 441.485 452,724 2.55% . Capital Expenses 306,331 286,557 142.744 750.19% . Debt Service 0 - 0 0 Other 655.034 629,028 646,870 2.84% Operating Transfers Q Q Q TOTAL FUND APPROPRIATION. $1,963,620$1,985,730 $1,898,457 -4.40% 11. FUNDING SOURCES (Memo Detail) From Working Capital Reserve $249.312 Sales, Fees, & Misc. $426,579 $514,167 595.281 15.78% General Fund subsidy 1.512,684 � , -27.55% TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES _$1�939,263 $1,968,759 $1,898,457 III. SUMMARY -OF CHANGES Reduction of subsidy reflects use of accumulated working capital. IV. POSITION SUMMARY FY98 FY99 FY 2000 (Memo Detail) ACTUAL BUDGET RECOMMENDED A. FULL TIME 1. TEAMSTER 580 2, 2 2 2. UAW 16 15 15 TOTAL 18 1$ 1$ B. OTHER 1. UAW SEASONAL 3 3 3 2. UAW PART-TIME 1 1 1 2.13 Cemetery Fund I. APPROPRIATIONS FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 2000 % change (Memo -Detail) N FY2000 to FY99 0ACTUAL 6f'30� 1Z/31/99� RECOMMENDED BUDGET Personnel $245,953 $255,510 $269.866 5.62% Employee Benefits 169,210 177,207 185,708 4.80% Capital Expenses -42,753 21,600 44,600 106.48•% Debt Service 0 255,850 0 •276,021 0 224,609 -18.63% Other lam Q a Operating Transfers TOTAL FUND APPROPRIATION $727,496 $730,338 5724.783 -0.76% 11. FUNDING SOURCES (Memo Detail) Sales, Fees, & Misc. $263,97.4 $246,900 $250,745 From Perpetual Care Fund 82,589 •80,000 70,000 From Working Capital 245.331 216,553 General Fund subsidy 465,731 158-107 187,485 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES $812 294 $730,338 $724,783 -Ill. SUMMARY OF CHANGES A. Add $20,000 for development of a columbarium at Evergreen Cemetery IV. POSITION SUMMARY FY98 FY99 FY2000 (Memo Detail) ACTUAL_ BUDGET PROPOSED A.• FULL TIME 1. TEAMSTER 580 1 1 1 2. UAW 5 5 6 TOTAL 6 6 ¢ B. OTHER 1. UAW SEASONAL 9 9 9 2.14 GOLF FUND I. APPROPRIATIONS FY 1997-98 , FY98-99 FY 2000 % change (Memo Detail) ACTUAL NET BUDGET MAYOR'S FY 2000 to FY99 06/30/98 12/31/96 RECOMMENDED BUDGET Personnel $415;601 $469,962 $491.345 4.55%. * Employee Benefits 185.035 216,129 234.640 8.56% Capital Expenses 128,502 .78,544 131.500 67.42% Debt Service 66,865 100,183 103,615 3.43% Other .527,599 640,683 650,882 1.59% Operating Transfers Q Q Q TOTAL FUND APPROPRIATION $1.323.602 S1.565.501 S1.611.982 7.07% II. FUNDING SOURCES (Memo Detail) Sales, Fees, & Misc. $854.304 $1,372,101 $1,475,925 Ingham County contribution 97,500 0 0 General Fund subsidy 200,662 120,621 136,057 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES $1 212.466 S1.492.722 $1,611,982 III. SUMMARY OF CHANGES Fee change on cart rentals, and increase in number of carts to rent, supports increase of two seasonal positions for course maintenance. IV. POSITION SUMMARY FY98 FY99 FY2000 (Memo Detail) ACTUAL BUDGET. PROPOSED A. FULL TIME. 1. TEAMSTER 214 0.7 0.7 0.7 2. TEAMSTER 580 2.1 2.1 2.1 2. UAW 4.2 4,2 4.2 B. OTHER 1. UAW SEASONAL TOTAL 7.0 LQ La 10 8 10 2.15 Parks Millage Fund For the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2000 Estimated Revenue Operating Transfer - General Fund Appropriations PARKS MILLAGE CAPITAL PROJECTS 412 933890 743000 46042 DESIGN CONSULTANT 412 933890 746000 46026 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE CITY-WIDE 412 933890 971000 46077 FENNER LAND ACQUISITION 412 933890 971000 46095 OAK PARK ACQUISITION 412 933890 971000 46096 POYET ACQUISITION 412 933890 974000 46097 WASHINGTON ICE RINK DASHER BOARDS 412 933890 974000 46098 SKATE BOARD - BMX FACILITY 412 933890 974000 46086 RNERTRAIL-CLIPPERT TO HARRISON 412 933890 974000 46089 FRANCES PARK SHORELINE 412 933890 975000 46066 FOSTER CENTER REPAIRS 412 933890 977000 46049 PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIP 412 933890 992000 46020 CONTINGENCY PARKS MILLAGE CAPITAL PROJECTS ADOPTED BUDGET S1,748,403 $1.748.403 $62,498 21,170 150,000 128,882 144,000 100,000 • 56,000 8,733 109,120 308,000 60,000 $1,748,403 2.16 I CIP SCHEDULE FOR ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2000 ADOPTED gppropriatWm BUDGET CAPITAL PROJECTS - INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 410 932690 743000 43861 MASTER PLANNING $100,000 410 933290 974100 43856 PRUDDEN ACCESS RD 12,500 410 933290 977008 43815 COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 1,400,000 410 933590 977000 43862 TONING SYSTEM ' 60,000 410 933690 973101 13077 CITY SHARE STORM SEWERS 390,000 410 933690 743000 43863 TWO WAY TRAFFIC STUDY 300,000 410 933690 974100 43864 DWIGHT/CAPITAL INTERSEC. 31,600 410 933690 974100 43865 2000 ROADS 1,255,400 410 933690 974100 43866 ALLEY REPAIR 50,000 410 933690 974200 13071 SIDEWALKS 450,000 410 933690 974100 43867 AURELIUS/PAULSON 500,000 410:• 933690 974100 43868 DIAMOND RED PAP 50.E 410 933690 975000 43869 CITY HALL ALARMS 210,000 410 933690 975000 43870 ADA ENTRANCE -CITY' HALL 94,000 410 933690 975000 43871 ARCHITECT/MAINTENANCE 100.E 410 933690 977000 43812 MAINFRAME COMPUTER UPGRADES 1,208,000 410 933890 970000 13023 BALLFIELD DEVELOPMENT 16,970 410 933890 977000 43839 PARKS BLDG USE EQUIP REPLACEMENT 6,244 CAPITAL PROJECTS - INFRASTRUCTURE FUND $6,234,670 2.17 ADMINISTRATION DIVISION ARK DESIGN & RESEARCH FFICE & BUSINESS MANAGEMENT L CLERICAL CUSINESS ADMINISTRATION N POTTER PARK / ZOO DIVISION 00 URA OPERATIONS ACILITY MAINTENANCE I SECURITY SERVICES GOLF / WASHINGTON ICE DIVISION PERATIONS COMMUNITY CENTER FOSTE MILLER OCTOBER 13, 1999 c:\EGPT\PROGRAM\ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE.DWG CITY OF LANSING I a CITY COUNCIL I a• a MAYOR DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION I DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DEPUTY DIRECTOR FIELD SERVICES DIVISION ANTING P/M IM / REMOVAL & LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE i ,.AREA 1 LRAVEL CREW I SE RAVEL CREW 2 SW THLETIC FIELDS SOUTH EMETERY BURIAL / MAINT. —INFRASTRUCTURE EPAIR CREWS i TTOOLS RAVEL CREW 4 a .EISURE SERVICES DIVISION IFETIME SPORTS PECIAL RECREATION SERVICES ACILITIES & MAINTENANCE i d PARK BOARD BUSINESS MANAGEMENT DIVISION / OAK PARK PARK SECURITY EA 2 IVERFRONT PARK ATHLETIC FIELDS NORTH RANCES --LANDSCAPE TRAVEL CREW 3 N TURNER —DODGE HOUSE FENNER NATURE CENTER COMMUNITY SCHOOL PROGRAMS SECTION 3 PLANNING PROCESS PLANNING PROCESS Discussion of the Plan Development Process: The Lansing Five Year Parks and Recreation Master Plan is based upon a planning process that was initiated in February of 1999. The process will conclude in February of 2000 following a Public Hearing before the City Council. During this twelve month period, many meetings, analyses and discussions will have taken place between the Parks and Recreation Department staff, appointed board members, elected officials, neighborhood groups and the public. A series offocus groups were organized to determine priorities for 18 specific program and/or facility areas. Each focus group was asked to provide five top priority items for their particular focus area (see Appendix A). As part of the planning process, a checklist was developed for the park system to help identify the deficiencies and needs of a particular site. Focus group chairs and maintenance staff had a number of sites assigned to them to inspect. Following these inspections, the focus group chairs and maintenance personnel then met with Tanya Moore, Landscape Architect for the department, and Phil Dorland, Deputy Director for the department, to develop a list of maintenance and repair needs and site improvements by park site titled "Infrastructure Needs." (Note: the "Infrastructure Needs List is not reprinted in its entirety in this plan document) The lists was prioritized utilizing a modified version of the capital improvements priorities schedule adopted by the City Council with their 1994-1995 budget. (See Appendix E, E.2-E.3.) The "Infrastructure Needs" list was then subdivided to develop 1) a "Master Project" list of capital improvements projects (those estimated to cost $15,000 or more) (See Appendix E ), 2) the capital improvements schedule to meet the requirements of a Community Recreation Plan for thq Michigan_,.____ ... D e pir-tmenf of NaturahResources, Financial Services Division, Grants Management Section (see Potential Grant Funded Projects, Section 5, page 5.8), and 3) a maintenance and repair project list of items estimated to cost less than $ l 5,000 (not included in this plan document). Those projects that may be eligible for a grant have been selected based on the type of project compared to the Park and Recreation Department's past experience with the DNR's scoring process used in awarding acquisition or development grants. The estimated cost, the year of implementation and the suggested funding source(s) is shown for each project. Utilizing the focus group reports in conjunction with comments from the Park Board and public, a list titled "Program/Operational Needs" was also developed (See Appendix G). The Park Board held a working session to review the focus committee reports, the proposed mission statement, goals and objectives the "Infrastructure Needs" list and the "Capital Improvements Schedule -Potential Grant Supported Project" list. Park Board input was then incorporated into the plan to develop a draft for public review for the November 17, 1999 Park Board meeting. At this meeting public comment will be taken and analyzed by the Park Board and staff. Additional 3.1 modifications to the draft master plan were made before forwarding the draft back to the Park Board to make their final recommendations and before referring the master plan to the City Planning Board, Mayor and City Council. The Planning Board was provided an overview of the master plan on December 7, l 999. ,The Planning Board on January 25, 2000, voted unanimously (6-0) to endorse the Parks and Recreation Draft Master Plan 2000-2005, and to forward its comments to the Parks and Recreation Department. A public hearing as scheduled before the City Council asking for additional citizen review and input on January 31, 2000. The public hearing notice was advertised in the local newspaper "The Lansing State Journal" requesting public comment on January 13, 2000. Following the public hearing, comments were evaluated and modifications made to the master plan based on the input received. The invitation will also be broadcasted on a local cable station, Channel 12, to assist in advertising for public participation. Recreational deficiencies in neighboring communities were also analyzed and recreation plans were reviewed and inventoried for significant components that would influence Lansing's Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The city's demographic data was adopted from the previous master plan. This data used the 1990 census data to correlate parks and census tracts. The analysis highlights significant sociological facts which can be used to assist in determining need within a specific section of the city. Following the 2000 census this data and analysis will need updating. Description of the Key Persons involved in the process: Parks & Recreation staff throughout the department were involved in compiling inventories, making site inspections, heading up focus groups- and drafting reports. Field maintenance ,personnel.. - "' conducted-individuaf Oarsiteinspections and filled out Park Facility Checklists. Tanya Moore, Landscape Architect for the department, and Phil Dorland, Deputy Director for the department, met with focus group chairs and maintenance personnel to develop a list for items ("Infrastructure Needs") that need to be improved upon , repaired or better maintained. Seven of the Leisure and Special Recreation Services staff headed up focus groups along with the Forestry Manager, Potter/Park Zoo Curator, and Golf Manager. Bob Ford, President of Landscape Architects and Planners along with R. Eric Reickel, Director of the Parks and Recreation Department headed the focus group on downtown parks and regional park issues. John McComb, city budget analyst, is responsible for compiling the city's capital improvement budget for the Mayor's budget recommendation and was involved with the Infrastructure Focus Group and project prioritization. Bill Rieske, Principal Planner with the Planning and Neighborhood Development Department worked with the Infrastructure and Downtown Park Focus Groups to provide a link with other city master planning projects. The Park Board held a working session to review the staffs draft report and to provide input. The Park Board held a public meeting to gain additional input from the neighborhood organizations and the public. The Planning Board reviewed the plan and provided their endorsement. The City Council will held a public hearing to receive public input on January 31, 2000. It is important to note that many citizens volunteered their time to work with the focus groups and 3.2 to take time out to provide public input at the various meetings held in relationship to this plan. Detail regarding their involvement is highly visible in various sections of this plan. Appendix A contains the focus group reports along with the names of people who provided input. Description of Public Involvement Process used in Development of the Plan: The City of Lansing has 127,321 inhabitants, as per the 1990 census, differing in their cultural and economic characteristics and living environments that range from urban neighborhoods to isolated residences. It is challenging to develop a city-wide recreation plan that focuses on both the general population as well as specific interest groups and individual recreation needs. A variety of techniques were used in obtaining input representing small and large segments of the population. The following describes the process used to obtain this input for the five year forecast. Public Meetings/Hearings: The Park Board reviewed the focus group reports, mission statement, goals and objectives, and the project/program priorities at a working session on October 26, 1999. The Park Board took public comment and at their November 17, 1999 meeting. Further revisions were made by staff based on comments provided by the public and Park Board members. The Park Board provided their final recommendations at their December 15, 1999 meeting and moved to refer the master plan to the Mayor. The Planning Board at their December 7� 1999 meeting was„provided.an overview:. of.the_Draft..,....._..,._ ._._.._ �- _a.. . _. Master Plan by Parks and Recreation staff. The Planning Board on January 25, 2000, voted unanimously (6-0) to endorse the Parks and Recreation Draft Master Plan 2000-2005, and to forward its comments to the Parks and Recreation Department. Parks and Recreation staff provided the City Council, Committee of the Whole an overview of the Draft Master Plan on January 20, 2000. A public hearing was held on the Draft Master Plan by the Lansing City Council on January 31, 2000. The City Council, Committee of the Whole discussed the Draft Master Plan at both their February 3`d and 10`h meeting before developing a resolution for modification and adoption the February 14, 2000 meeting. The meeting notices and minutes from these meetings excerpts are included in Appendix C. 3.3 Surveys: The Neighborhood and City Wide Parks Focus Group through the Lansing Neighborhood Council and the Lansing State Journal provided neighborhood residents an opportunity to answer five questions published in the Neighborhood Section of the newspaper. The questions were: what city parks) do you use, what are the three most critical problems with neighborhood parks, what new playground equipment or support amenities (restrooms, drinking fountains, bike racks, etc.) do you see as a need and in which park, what new programs do you think we need in our city parks, and do you feel safe in a city park. The returns from this survey in conjunction with inventories and recommendations from park maintenance personnel were used to assist this group in determining its top five ranked priorities and developing the deficiencies listing included in the master plan. W orkshops/Informational: A series of meetings were held with various focus groups within the community. The following list represents the different focus groups which were formed to obtain opinions on specific topic areas. Each group had a staff chairperson who solicited members from city staff and the community who had knowledge, interest and desire to participate in formulating five top priorities within the focus area. FOCUS GROUP Access Joan Lenhard Aquatics Mary Winegar Athletic Facilities (Park/School) & Programs Tony Noyola Cemeteries (Lansing Municipal) Carol Abbott Community Centers & Senior Citizens Debbie Balan Cultural Arts and Historical Elizabeth Homer �--- -- - Downtown"Parks "- Robert Ford Forestry (Street and Park) Paul Dykema Golf Operations (Lansing Municipal) Don Ballard Infrastructure (Park & Recreation System) Phil Dorland Natural Areas Neighborhood and City Wide Parks Neighborhood Park Programs Oak Park Maintenance Complex Potter Park and Zoo Regional Recreation Issues Scott Art & Garden Washington Park Ice Skating Complex Clara Bratton Phil Dorland Murdock Jemerson Phil Dorland Gerry Brady Robert Ford Diane Townsend Don Ballard Each of the focus groups produced a report indicating the top five priorities. High ranked priorities were identified and included in the five year plan. Focus group reports have been included in Appendix A. A draft copy of the Lansing Parks Five Year Master Plan was produced and complete copies were 3.4 made available, along with the 1995 Demographic Study, for review and comment at: Gier, Foster, and Letts Community Centers, the Clerk's office, the City Council office, the Parks and Recreation Administrative office at 318 N. Capital, and the Planning and Neighborhood Development Administrative office at 316 N. Capital. Each park board member, -received a copy for their review and comment. Excerpts of selected sections (Planning Process, Capital Improvement Funding Schedule and Five Year Action Plan) of the plan were sent to each focus group chair, agencies such as Tri-County Regional Planning, adjacent county recreation departments and agencies within the city such as police, planning and public service and other staff members. A second effort was made to contact these parties and agencies to verify their comments or clarify specific points made during the planning process. Description of Planning Results/Recreational Deficiencies: City of Lansing residents are fortunate in that they have a wealth of outdoor and indoor facilities for parks recreation -and leisure. As the Section 4 inventory details, Lansing has 107 public parks including four community centers. The city also has four golf courses, three cemeteries and eight miles of river trail system connecting several of Lansing's park and cultural amenities. The city features several historical parks such as Durant Park, Reutter Park, and Kalamazoo Plaza (first Oldsmobile factory site). The Turner/Dodge House is the only 19' century residence in the greater Lansing area that is open the general public year around. Other outstanding attractions include Potter Park Zoo, Fenner Nature Center, Frances Park andCooleyPark gardens. The City of Lansing offers many opportunities for recreation and leisure through its facilities and programming. The focus groups along with input of appointed board members, elected officials, neighborhood groups and the public provided strong insight into what the city's residents considered deficient in terms of parks and recreation facilities and services. These comments and recommendations, combined with the staff developed infrastructure project list, established a strong - �_ ,. .� .�— ._. _ _ _ -- �— ---framework-from which the Parks-and'Recreation-Departmenf adrrumstrative staffwas able to develop the five year action plan. In assessing the deficiencies of Lansing, an evaluation of existing programs and facilities combined with public input was considered the most efficient way of determining need. Programming for the city's park facilities is extensive with activities for youth, adults, and programs for the impaired. Analysis of the committee reviews, revealed many requests for improved programming including more basketball, volleyball and baseball for women and seniors. The Access Focus Group suggested programs for the disabled such as increased signage and relief maps, special events with video, audio cassette and audio services, open aquatic times for walkers, stretchers versus lap swim and travel programs. The Neighborhood Parks Program Focus Group requested programs such as those that promote developmental skills and provide personal satisfaction as well as activities to challenge youth while increasing self-esteem. The Forestry Focus Group had suggestions for adjusting pruning cycles, updating tree inventories and developing the public's awareness of trees. New exhibits are desired by the zoo, as it is a popular, growing amenity and must continue with an expected level of service. 3.5 Renovation of existing facilities was also a strong consideration of several focus groups. Improvement requests were extensive for ongoing maintenance at our facilities. Maintenance by means of capital improvements were listed quite heavily with regard to parks and recreation needs. Several projects have been slated for, development -concerning rehabilitation for improved service output. To establish a relationship of facilities and programs to neighboring communities, the Regional Recreation Focus Group was developed. This group consisted of park and recreation professionals from Ingham, Eaton and Clinton Counties, DeWitt, Meridian, Watertown, Lansing, Delta and Delhi Townships, and the cities of East Lansing and Grand Ledge. The park and recreation professionals shared insight on their current programs, facilities and future plans. Neighboring communities recreation plans that were previously obtained through the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Recreation Division were also reviewed. Several common elements were presented as having great need within their present recreation systems. Additional sports facilities were demanded including renovated ball diamonds, lighted fields, a BMX track, soccer facilities, skateboard and in -line skating. The group also expressed the need for a regional park map, to be distributed by paper maps, and also accessed from the Internet. On the naturalistic side of tri-county area recreation, many requests were made for improvements of trails and walkways through natural areas or along waterways. There were many priorities listed for capital improvements, maintenance and renovation of existing facilities and park lands. The issue of maintaining existing infrastructure was a strong concern. Comments and information from the parks and recreation professionals in the neighboring communities along with deficiencies identified in their recreation plans were analyzed-relative-to......R comments from- the-Lansing-Parks'and=Recreation Department staff, appointed board members, elected officials, focus groups, the director's views, public comments and the 1990 demographic information we utilized to frame the five year action plan. Therefore, in assessing the needs of Lansing's community, specific requests have been made to upgrade the following: All Seniors programming - Through upgraded community centers. Athletic programs - Through new and/or upgraded sports facilities (parks). 3.6 Access programs - By technical resource utilization such as multimedia innovations, television and family interaction. Regional park map - Joint efforts between/among communities within the Lansing region will go a long way to share in the resources (natural and people resources) that all communities have to offer. After -school programs - Through upgraded community centers and pools. Maintenance programs - Through renovation of Oak Park maintenance facility, the establishment of city owned planting stocks, master planning e orts and continued capital improvements/replacements.- Zoo facilities - Through new exhibits and a broader funding base. Historical preservation - By renovations to Scott House and Turner -Dodge. Natural preservation - By continued renovations to Fenner Nature Center Promotion/Tourism - Through increased marketing and advertising strategies/efforts. City-wide Linkage - By maintaining and extending the River Trail system. - Water based recreation - By acquiring water front parcels and developing facilities which relate to said activities. Teen facilities and programs- By providing additional facilities, program staff and program supplies. Skate board facilities- Through cooperative efforts with local groups, site determination, construction design and implementation. BMX facilities- Through a cooperative venture with the National Bicycle League and a local non profit organization to construct and manage. The major concerns of the focus groups tended to lean toward internal restoration. Quality service -- was. -the -underlying theme -to many of their requests: "A high quality-level"rr uk 6e`maintained by the Parks and Recreation Department in all divisions of operation from staffing and programming to facility maintenance and accessibility. In striving to meet the mission of the department, quality service is a definite priority. All of the city's needs, regardless of their inclusion on the above listing, will be positively impacted by providing customer service in a friendly manner. This may include adding trained staff, recruiting more volunteers or hiring outside/private services. Many of the focus groups stated a need for staffing and/or increased personnel training and education. The formulation of specific interest committees was also listed by more than one group as being important for interaction and communication with the city's population. 3.7 SECTION 4 RECREATION INVENTORY RECREATION INVENTORY The recreation inventory provides: 1) a description/inventory of recreation opportunities within Lansing's political boundaries, 2) a description/inventory of re- creation opportunities outside of Lansing's political boundaries, 3) maps showing locations of facilities and 4) a description ofLansing's barrier -free compliance status. The importance of this inventory is in its use for identifying and assessing the community's needs within our present parks recreation services and facilities. The information presented in this section will begin with a recent map displaying the city's park lands on page 4.2, followed by a Park Facilities Inventory Chart (page 4.3 - 4.4) listing activities and site characteristics found at each park. Current recreational programs offered by the city are then described on pages 4.5 - 4.12. This listing is followed by a location map of all Community and Senior Centers (page 4.13) that are operated by the city and other charitable organizations. Also provided is a listing of all Lansing Schools with their classifications of city-wide, community or neighborhood (page 4.14 - 4.15) and a location map showing School/Park combinations (page 4.16). A map showing the locations for the city's Golf Courses and Cemeteries is then provided on page 4.17, followed by a map illustrating the locations of Lansing's Natural and Historic Sites (page 4.18). A list of non -city owned recreation facilities in the area is presented, pages 4.19 - 4.28, a listing of Regional Parks and Recreation Facilities (page 4.29 - 4.32) and a map representing regional facilities on pages 4.33. To conclude the inventory, a description of Lansing's barrier -free compliance status is described on pages 4.34 - 4.41. Finally, we must mention, the Community Services Guide. The department publishes the guide seasonally to announce the programs that will occur. 4.1 c OEM Jim t•:N fib . aim� I I 4.2 PARK FACILI TIES INVENTORY LANSING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT INDEX PARK NAME slmuanr�uuwwawmom D 5 ADADO RNERFRONT 1,4 W Q 28.00 ,k :9 G k O h 02 C Ie W s 7 I c� -1 c J U. m O S K m n z V J J m F- 11! x 9 W! U) J Q m r U. U. i F K 5� O ': V 9i ra �i I z k: z � �I 2 J QJQ m } W J J > r W L a = {I� IL IL • Q 0 z' U IL • ! G ; W " r W ii N !i U z s! U !. a !{ co .6 N a 33 j Q 3 w .. 2 S R' r H • O __ Y !Q z) C o W Lu € I:? Y .€ K 3 O a Q K !: r :� Q '& m l D 0 z x d • W N =O U. K W Q 3 W > • r: z fN W U Q J r W! > •co . .SPECIAL PARK FEATURES CITY MARKET, AMPHITHEATER, FESTIVALS 1.4 ATTWOOD 3 28.80 ;!' • •; • • • I LARGE OPEN FIELD G-2 AVERILL 3 8.00 !! • kJ • J C 6 BANCROFT 1 45.30 ? • • !!! • • • • • ! • F-5 BARB DEAN TOT LOT 1 0.89!J • • • !I t! C-0 BASSETT 4 4.00 !r • • KJ • { 1-5 BECK 2 10.40 �( )!' • {!! d: !J 1-4 BLUEBELL 2 2.70 (F • €! • !( !H. C-5 BURCHARD 4 5.201, { D • • • FISH LADDER, N. DAM, CANOE PORTAGE F-6 CAESAR-DONORA 1 3.00 &) • s' H-5 CAVANAUGH 2 25.00 {!! • • ( • J • • E-5 CHERRY HILL 4 4.70 G ii 2 • • • !!! RID • • F-5 CLIFFORD 1 5.40 `:°i E:: • • I, 3 C4 COMSTOCK 4 8.20 ' 2 • I!j • •i) • • F • :{ E-5 COOLEY 4 1.40 {1-1 iJ FORMAL GARDEN F-7- CREGO (LARGEST) 2 200.70 D • • • ;LAKE FRONTAGE, NATURAL SETTING 1-3 DAVIS 3 41.80 ; 3 • 2 • ; 2 • • • v • {{ C-5 DIETRICH 4 5.00 !; Y! • • • • CDUNNEBACKE 3 4 6.40 j!i, 2 • • �i • 0.5 DURANT 4 3.00 •a j • • r { HISTORIC SITE, ARCH 45 EDMORE 4 0.50ja • €!j • { • E-5 ELM 1 5.60 a • • • • • • G-4 ELMHURST 3 5.00h • • r! 2 • F' G-5 EVERETT 2 3.00 j4 • • • ¢j i D-7 FAIRVIEW 1 11.820 (> ( NATURAL AREA G-7 FENNER 2 126.0011 !j • j!i. • • A • • ARBORETUM, TOURS D4 FERRIS 4 7.14 1 • j • IN B-5 FILLEY 4 2.201i • !! • • iii IN H-1 FINE 3 35.80 q! IIj jj • G-7 FOREST VIEW 2 8.10 ! • 2 [1 2 • • • ; • • i!i • 0.7 FOSTER COMM. CTR. 1 2.30I% >j • • • j • COMMUNITY CENTER, GYM E-7 FOSTER 1 4.D0 j! • 3 ({ • !jj i F-2 FRANCES 4 57.80 '' • 3 • °'1 • • I!!j O • !!! • • ':, FORMAL FLOWER GARDENS, RIVER OVERLOOK H-1 FULTON 3 26.30?; E • • D • Jill RNER OVERLOOK J-3 GEORGETOWN 3 11.20 (t;' • 3 ! 2 • • ;J • ;) B-5 GIER COMM. CTR. 1 36.50 !j 4 • j • !( • • ':! • ! COMMUNITY CENTER, GYM, SOFTBALL COMPLEX G•7 GLEN EDEN 2 3.00 F-2 GRAND RIVER 4 42.60 ij: 3.! !i! • • ':! R/D • • J;j ' B-1 GRAND WOODS 4 139.30 (j. ?1 • • iij • • • • • ' ADMINISTERED BY DELTA TOWNSHIP J-2 GRAVES - 3 8,00 !j • • ?'! • j ';� F-5 GREENCROFT 2 H-2 HILLBORN 3 6.70 ji( • • Ni • f!i E-4 HILLSDALE 4 3.20 j: Ji • !I! i( G3 HOLLY 3 5 00 HORSEBROOK 4 4 30 �: • • {,! • i ,I _B-3 D-4 HULL COURT 4 1.30 1, • 1. • N': (j'. E-6 HUNTER 1 14 00 ;! • • iij 2 • • ;" • • ` OUTDOOR SWIMMING POOL G-3 INGHAM 3 11.801(, • • i!j • (l (!! j! F-6 IRVING 1 0A0 B4 JONES_LAKE 4 1.80 Jjj, j( ;j j! • • ! LAKE FRONTAGE E-5 KALAMAZOO PLAZA 4 0.40 jl: {! • NI • J R.E. OLDS MEMORIAL STATUE 1.5 KAYNORTH 2 5.20rl: :i1J • yj J1 H-6 KENDON 2 1 5.60i- • • "i; • '' G7 KIMBERLY 1 19.50 ii'. ;'! !!' a j{ NATURAL MARSH ECO SYSTEM E-8 KIRCHER (MUNICPAL) 1 6.70 1.• • (j • • j! BASEBALL STADIUM C-5 LARCH 1 0.50 1 E-4 LETTS COMM. CTR. 4 4.60 111i • • J11 4 • • J{ • • ` • j COMMUNITY CENTER, GYM F-2 LEWTON 3 1.70 { $J • iij !'? i G-6 LYONS 2 5.00 !t • ;! 2 • !!; III 4 : 3 02/141D0109'38.03 AM Pape 1 of 2 INDEX PARK NAME J-6 MARSCOT Q ?� 2 N Lu„= Q 5.00 i Z O '( Q jI C W n _j G J W ¢ °° O S =p m = O z • a o U J m rii ai w U U O W J ¢m I P. $ ' ; F 7 U M z � 2 J m �! J i W O. W g • `. [ K ;; ¢ a; z: a W J x . h U z : a *8 Q � J 3 N O O K y �a t6 Y O Z G W N :u i O n. .I a m 2 Y n. w Z O ILL W 11- 3 K w rx 2 Q) 0) v U Q QJQ ~ R w a SPECIAL PARK FEATURES D-6 MARSHALL 1 11.40 ? • • • • I 9 • • • I • SAND VOLLEYBALL 1-3 McKINCH 3 5.50:!! • • • D-2 MICHIGAN AVE. 4 28.10 it • p; • I( • { J-5 MILLER ROAD C.C. 2 0.30 iy • i • • INDOOR MEETING CENTER F4 MOORES 4 22.90 j`h • • i?{ 2 • • O • D • • SHUFFLEBOARD, S. DAM, OUTDOOR SWIMMING 1-7 MUNN 2 14.40 i hi • {+{ ;$ { D-6 OAK 1 16.70 • j{ • • ) • • ; D-6 119th ARMORY 1 6.80 j) • • iij • b C-6 ORMOND 1 8.20 iP • • • re D3 OSBORN 4 0.60 1 gi • { H-3 PLEASANT VIEW 3 7.40 • I • j C-6 PORTER 1 10.70 ji; • • j;j • • F-6 POTTER 1 98.50 I! • • „ O • k O • • ;1 ZOO, CANOE RENTALS, FEE* H-6 PDXSON 2 16.70 ;' • • jy F-4 QUENTIN 4 10.30 j 2 • Ij 2 • • q D-8 RANNEY 1 19.10 '!; • 3 • • '.Ii • 'SOFTBALL STADIUM G5 REASONER 1 6.60 y • • ;j • • • j E-7 REGENT 1 4.90 ;i; ?j • 'I G-5 REOLA 2 0.60 • E-5 REUTTER 4 3.00 jj':,? • `: " FOUNTAIN H-3 RISDALE 3 17.60 i • • 2 €j • j • E-5 RIVERPOINT 1 4.40 j L; • • ;{ • D • • • RIVER CONFLUENCE F-4 RIVERSIDE 4 7.30 ej ( ;I • E-3 ST.JOSEPH 4 18.80 y 3 • • 6 • j •ry • E-5 SCOTT CENTER 4 5.50 ;)':.I ;ij • is • • SUNKEN GARDEN, INDOOR MEETING CENTER G6 SCOTT WOODS 2 87.40 ;) • Ijj • • ;ij • • ( • • NATURAL SETTING B-6 SEVENTH 1 1.60 '4 • 6`:. • • {! i; F-6 SHUBEL 2 55.60 ji II { 4 • I CEMETERY OFFICE E-6 STABLER 1 1.30 _t • !=I • F-6 STROUD 2 0.80 !A • I;j • { G2 SUNSET HILLS 4 0.40 ;( F-6 SYCAMORE 2 10.00 ; • • • • 5j • ;i • '.4 • G-7 TAMMANY 2 1.60 ;j • i;j • G3 TECUMSEH 4 39.00 I • • (jj 2 • • {' • • F-6 TRAGER 1 0.60 • • G5' TURNER (SMALLEST 1 0.04 j • j 'E 'MINI PARK G5 TURNER -DODGE 4 11.30; II • Fe D • • • HISTORIC HOUSE, INDOOR MEETING CENTER H-2 WAINWRIGHT 3 5.40jN • • aj • j P H-5 WALDO 2 0.50. • !j • ;k F-6 WALSH 1 4.00i • • zl • f?{ t G-4 WASHINGTON 4 45.40 k • 4ij • • `j O • • INDOOR ICE RINK (FEE)- E-5 WENTWORTH 4 0.90,. '`j jq • j D-3 WEST SIDE 1 4 15.50 I 2 • • • j • (;j • • Jill • 1 1 Ij HORSESHOES K4 WILLOUGHBY 2 50.00 j B-2 WILSON 4 4.90 $ • • j. 2 • • j; • {( j H-1 WOODCREEK 3 4.40 !{ • • .!; 2 • • j TOTAL PARK ACREAGE GOLF COURSES 1765.19 AVERAGE PARK SIZE 16.3 ACRES C-6 GROSEBECK 1 1 115.68 • T • • 18 HOLES, SHOWERS, LOCKERS, FEE• E-8 RED CEDAR 1 61.27 jN jl y • • • • 9 HOLES, SHOWERS, FEE• F-6 SYCAMORE 2 53.25 f I { • 1 • ' 9 HOLES, FEE' D 2 WAVERLY 4 115.90 • 1 9 HOLES, FEE - TOTAL G.C. ACREAGE CEMETERIES 346.1 AVERAGE G.C. SIZE 88.5 ACRES G-7 EVERGREEN 2 103.90 j G8 MT, HOPE 2 84.20 { :Id !r. • J-6 NORTH 2 14.40 I IE Pd TOTAL CEM. ACREAGE 202.5 AVERAGE CEM. SIZE 67.5 ACRES RIVERTRAIL HAS OF2000 1,2,4 PAVED -BOARDWALK TRAILWAY ALONG THE RED CEDAR AND GRAND RIVERS (SEE ACCESS POINTS ABOVE) • ONE FACILITY / ACTIVITY O -FEE 4.4 02/14/00 / 09:38:03 AM Page 2 of 2 CITY FUNDED RECREATION PROGRAMS Fenner Nature Center - Fenner nature day camp (w/early drop off offered) Fall color walk Bird feeding tips Bird walks Butterfly gardens Christmas for the critters Star watch Nature for preschoolers Nature explorations for parent and child Moon walks (winter tours) Winter wildflowers Girl Scout badges Brownie Try -its badges Cub Scout tours & badges Saturday children's programs Interpretive tours for schools, scouts, senior citizens, etc. Maple Syrup Festival Apple Butter Festival Turner -Dodge House Time travelers history camp (Chores galore and simple pleasures; Parties, parties, parties -Victorian traditions; Family Fun at the turn of the century) (early drop-off offered) Gadgets and gizmos Guided tours Raspberry tea Victorian ventures Washday blues Your home for the holidays - Family Christmas Children's birthday party (Victorian) Heritage badges (Brownie Try -its, Jr. Girl Scouts, Boy Scouts & Cub Scouts) Valentine dinner Meet your City (local history program series and cable program) Mystery dinners Potter Park Zoo (& Zoological Society) Boo at the Zoo Wonderland of Lights Sundown Safari Tours and Outreach programs Valentine's Day special 4.5 M Zookambi (summer camp) Spring Break programs Girl Scout patch program Clown Days Teen Zookeeper Zookeeper for a Day Docent Training Sports, Games and Fitness Basketball (Men & Women, 30+) Adult basketball tournament Adult noon hoop Evening hoop Adult Volleyball (Men, Women & Co-ed) Sand volleyball Men's Baseball Senior Men's Baseball Women's Baseball Softball (Men, Women & Coed) Senior Softball Adult Tennis Spring Soccer, Boys & Girls Fall Soccer, Boys & Girls Floor Hockey, Boys & Girls Wildcat Baseball, Boys & Girls Wildcat Softball, Girls Girl's Fast Pitch Softball T-ball, Boys & Girls Jr. Baseball Basketball, Boys Basketball, Girls (new in 1999) Girl's Basketball Clinic Teddybear Basketball clinic Wrestling (youth) Wresting Camp Basic Fundamentals of Wrestling Adult Karate (beginning & advanced) Youth Karate (little warriors, beginning & advanced) Junior Karate Family Karate Self Defense Do Ryu Jutsu Karate Aiki Ju Jutsu Yoga 4.6 Dance Youth Floor Hockey Youth Floor Hockey Clinic Camp Lansing basketball camp (early drop-off offered) Camp Lansing soccer camp (early drop-off offered) U.S. Tennis Assoc., National Junior Tennis League (NJTL) Youth tennis fun day Tennis lessons (youth and adult) .Adult tennis tournament Punt, pass & kick Teen time Open recreation Acrobatics Tumbling Low -impact aerobics Kickbox aerobics Cardio kickbox Hi/low Aerobics -Fitness Factory Dance aerobics Healthy sensations aerobics Latino rhythm aerobic dance Ice skating lessons Tap Ballet Open square and contra Jazz (levels I & II) Mexican (levels I & II) Belly (beginning, intermediate & master) Swing Clogging Ballroom (beginning & intermediate) Mini -movement Pre -dance Acro/dance Fifty Plus Programs Blood Pressure Walking for the health of it MSU extension service/food nutrition workshops Miler's Club (walking club) All center picnic Outdoor lunches Bingo. 4.7 Horseshoes Travelogue Potluck Senior awareness Healthy minds Movie day Staying fit over 50 Chair exercise Clogging Scrabble Wheel of Fortune Euchre Skip -Bo Billiards Darts Shuffleboard All center holiday parties Bookmobile Birthday celebration Crafts Health maintenance workshops Halloween special Harvest week and celebration Line dancing for seniors Thanksgiving and Christmas dinner celebrations Christmas light tour Bridge lessons St. Patrick's Day celebration and dance Senior Mackinaw Trip Therapeutic Recreation Accommodations Miniature golf Dinner and social T-ball Sports Hershey track and field Day camp Bowling Adapted aquatics Leisure education programs Halloween Smore's and More Board games night Seasonal Dances Seasonal special events Um Youth sports/mobility programs Swimming Pools Outdoor Pools - Hunter and Moores Pools Open Swim (includes family swim time) Adult Swim Youth Lessons WSI Class - Indoor Pools - School District Pools (Gardner, Otto, Dwight Rich, Beekman) Open Swim (all ages) Youth and Adult Lessons (from Bobbin' Babes to adults) SPLASH Aqua Exercise Warm Water Exercise Lifeguard Training Enrichment Classes, Crafts and General Interest (Some classes listed under fitness) Nia dance Body sculpt & tone Oil painting Ukrainian Egg Art Drawing Drawing and design Cartooning for children Calligraphy Photography Creating a photo -safe scrapbook Organizing and preserving your photos Focus on- Michigan photo contest Learn to sew Sew a great costume Quilt making for the holidays Come quilt with us Cake decorating Youth cooking (young chefs) After school crafts Basic floral design Knitting Rag rug making Upholstery Yard care workshops Household maintenance workshops Lawnmower maintenance workshops 4.9 Take care of your car Computer classes Surfing on Dry land So You Wanna Have a Web Page Powerful Presentations Free Stuff on the Internet On a PC, we all do Windows 95 New computer in your future? How to buy and invest in real estate Investing for profit Planning for your financial future Sign language S.M.A.R.T. dog training Household dog obedience Community First Aid & Safety Hunter's safety Snowmobile safety Boater's safety Family fun nights Family bingo After school recreation After school kids club Home alone Babysitting How to play chess Travelogue Self-esteem w/manners Conflict resolution Team time Temper, temper How to talk to your parents Wiggle workshop Acting workshop Massage therapy Intro to basic massage Meditation Instant piano Conversational Italian Special Programs Community Centers Summer Programs Kids Kamp Program Summer Youth Fishing Clinics Summer Teen Recreation/Field Trip Program 4.10 Drama Camp Christmas Break open recreation Easter Egg Hunt Underwater Easter Egg Hunt Lunch with the Easter Bunny Rose for Mom (Mother's Day Essay Contest) Christmas with Santa Supper with Santa Say Cheese with Santa Letter to Santa Sleep over Nights Halloween Party Candidates' Night Daddy -daughter Dance Mother -son dance Family performing arts & entertainment series Fall Penny Carnival Teddy Bear 200 - race car party Used sporting goods sale Family horseback ride and cookout Walk Michigan Annual Looking Glass Music and Dance Festival Rummage sale Glen Dean Memorial Scrabble Tournament Boarshead theater presents No school days activities Volunteer income tax assistance Christmas gift drive Thanksgiving baskets Special Exhibits/Projects Before Freedom Came... (from Smithsonian Institute) Washington Ice Skating Complex Ice Skating Lessons Skate with Santa Men's 30 & Over Hockey Greater Lansing Hockey Association (City scholarships available for Lansing youth) Open Skating in Dome and Outdoor Rink Lansing Police Department P.A.L. (Police Athletic League) t1wel NON -CITY FUNDED RECREATIONAL PROGRAMS Cristo Rey Community Center Child services and northend K.I.D. program Breakfast/lunch Tutoring Services Kids summer kamp Self-esteem classes Bookmobile Beginning Spanish Neighborhood Education Center Family Math, Science & Literacy Parent Student Connection How to survive and enjoy parenting Ebersole Center Nature discovery camps Nature Discover 1: Wonderful water Nature Discover 2: Climbing the bear Boys and Girls Clubs of Lansing Summer fun program Scramble for youth golf outing Black Child and Family institute Summer academic and recreation program 4.12 W. w CARAVAN CLI GIER COMMUNITY CENTER TURNER -DODGE HOUSE Jll CRISTO REY AWAL COMMUNITY Cl ® R� b&SING SENIOR CENTER 1145" LETTS COMMUNITY 0CENTER FOSTER COMMUNITY CENTER -PIFT; 0--t7F �G 11 1;ACEs'1GUEgp sy 015 TiDD LL 0- im W T5 ull .0 r2 . ....... G;2 6;4OW) N. F, 7 P"i -3..! IT--�CHAU' TON Ll 2 F- -3 Z T' J st 'u I WOjMt BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBIL 2 W AL l VTF SOALE i'R r -j ol NO H li MILLER ROAD CAL C 71 .SENIOR CENTER CITY OF LANSING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PARCEL NORTH u- W-1— —;O;-TER CREGO Lj iE FR ARBERREORETU. I EWRIll PARCEL ph L4 m 4. LANSING PUBLIC SCHOOLS Allen Elementary Attwood Elementary Averill Elementary Beekman Cavanaugh Elementary Cumberland Elementary Eastern High Elmhurst Elementary Everett High Fairview Elementary Forest View Elementary Franks Elementary Gardner Middle Gier Park Elementary Grand River Elementary Gunnisonville Elementary Hill Center Kendon Elementary Lewton Elementary Lyons Elementary Maple Grove Elementary Maplewood Elementary Moores Park Elementary Mt. Hope Elementary North Elementary Northwestern Elementary Otto Middle Pattcngill Middle Pleasant View Elementary Post Oak Elementary Reo Elementary_ Rich Middle Riddle Elementary_ Sexton High Sheridan Road Elementary Vcrlindcn Elementary Wainwright Elementary Walnut Elementary Wexford Elementary Willow Elementary Woodcreek Elementary City -Wide City -Wide Community Community Community Community City -Wide NOTE: All elementary schools are considered neighborhood facilities. 4.14 LANSING NON-PUBLIC SCHOOLS Capitol City Baptist Elementary - High Chess Home School Emmanuel First Lutheran Elementary - High Hope Academy Elementary - High Higher Ground Holy Cross Immaculate Heart of Mary/St Casimir Lansing Catholic Central Middle & High Lansing Christian Elementary - High Lansing Seventh-Day Adventists Elementary - High Michigan Early Elementary Center Mid -Michigan Elementary School Edison Project Mid -Michigan Public School Academy Elementary - High Montessori Children's Center New Covenant Christian School Elementary - High Our Savior Lutheran Elementary - High Parker Memorial Baptist Sankofa Shule Shabazz Academy Elementary - High Walter French Academy Elementary - High 4.15 d= GIER . — WEST SI � dam u roc G WAYERLY GO �� L E _ � !LETTS COMMUNITY ._..CENTER ©� r._.• ........r_._.._. yI_.. ... T... .. ........ � ric IN ST. JOSEPH r T 1 I'A 3'a��a�w7 J or=i� •K — I;c• T. LEWTON iir;c MOORES T /*/ 4 . r i "l AVERILL Pur ELMHURST i.I 4LL_ ] I i _�U�I:''I .ii` :4....._. Y NS L O �:- J, WOODCREEK �im��_��all :. y J le i� F WAINWRIGHT S� ALE CAVANAUGH PLEASANT VIEW ULUEW" _ � _,: '?x_ FMCA�MCHYl 1. 1' f-Li I sJrt+ R. AYNORI A 1 1 Y Y OOD AT 016 }T GRAYE5 I... '+..R mil^^•'\ •'..r.•L •t �i I Y +•�.AR COLT "yGECMILL �M1{p �.... OA E CR ERR ' �� .�• ��M1l. new . I� I� �'�I` is _ Tom .--, - -. CITY OF LANSING-__ PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT © .i :LJ' el JGNE, lae. 3_#1. PARCEL NORTH _- jj.�' " .�' ..._.._.lj:xxrwwkaLRl�' L\�pv�anx�kawomen •..•Kfili Water er IN POTTER 4 CRE00 i t-A iE•� AgFENNER Y EVERGI / `PARCEL E 4.16 a A WEST WAVERLY GOLF COURSE ■ GROESBECK GOLF COURSE RED CEDAR d frlql 3 1 M. GOLF COURSE 11f. COLEY GA D T"t 1 W, C3 it El 41' TE POTR EVERGREEN-- 1 i� �[L Liz N1 H= 1717 71 CEMETERY !o/ J F-ARBORETUM SYCAMORE GOLF A A Y COURSE HOPE CEMETERY -9 MT. H T; 00 TR 'u -41 f . . ........ L I C1 V. 5 rn, rl! —NI NNI ... 01 V PARCEL ja .. ... .. ... . .... ..... if FiLl R -wcx NORTH CEMETERY 4 --�i I, i � � ; GEORGETOWN V. Val - CITY OF LANSING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT I.. NO.T. L: . . .. ........ 4.17 -- GRAND RIVER I BANCROFT PARK '"rinn Ij 1i %; TURNER -DODGE HOUSE F, dF 25 ILI, I m�,-- :r vic :5 mr Mf Maio M EST Si N"I �rl� STATE CAPITOL LN rro A!TE. CITY MARKET L IMPRESSION n P al CHIGAN HISTORIC MUSEUM JUg f 61 lkil ED D MUSEUM 7 10 - . I = R.E. OLDS MUSEUM SCOTT HOUSE AND il"20m E.' fr RED CEDAR RIVER COOLEY GARDENS p, om POTTER SY •-. PARK �a 4 C GO ARK MOORES PARK %-, LEwTON FENNER NAT .... ........ c E GHA. CENTER l SCOTTS WOODS Al it tjf�i A- F 171� t.s3 WAL H11 4 1 SYCAMORE CREEK f r13 III PARCE D - ly CE YAR Coi, ofloElo.. Ii t 1: CITY OF LANSING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PARCEL S NORTW 4.18 BILLIARDS - BOWLING - Non -City Owned Recreational Opportunities Barley's American Outpost: 727 E. Miller, Lansing Pinball Pete's: 3182 Mall Court, Lansing 220 Albert, East Lansing Pockets: 1618 S. Washington, Lansing Royal Scot Bowling Lanes: 4722 W. Grand River, Lansing Tripper's: 354 Frandor, Lansing Cosmic Lanes & Lounge: 1115 S. Washington, Lansing Goldstar Recreation: 825 W. Grand River, Williamston Holiday Lanes: 3101 E. Grand River, Lansing Lansing Bowling Association: 3227 Hepfer, Lansing Marvelanes: 2120 E. M-78, E. Lansing Mason Bowling Center: 801 N. Cedar, Mason Metro Bowl: 5141 S. Martin Luther King, Lansing Michigan State University Union: Abbott @ Grand River, East Lansing Pro -Bowl: 2122 N. Martin Luther King, Lansing Pro -Bowl: 2757 E. Grand River, E. Lansing Redwing Bowling Lanes: N. US-27, St. Johns Royal Scot Lanes: 4722 W. Grand River, Lansing 4.19 CAMPGROUNDS - CAMPS, - American Camping Association: 3208 West Rd., East Lansing Hickory Lake Campgrounds: 11433 S. Beardslee Rd., Perry Lansing Cottonwood Campground: o�und: 5339 Aurelius, Lansing Moon Lake Campground: 12700 S. Colby Lake Rd., Laingsburg Mullican's Riverside Resort: 3266 N. Ionia Rd., Vermontville Wheel Inn Campground: 240 Fogg, Leslie Aim Hijah Basketball Inc.: 1900 S. Cedar, Lansing Eaton Rapids Camp Meeting Retreats: 1707 Grand River Dr., Eaton Rapids Mason Children's Center: 311 S. Rogers, Mason Mystic Lake YMCA & Pa-Wa-Pi YMCA Day Camp: 2306 Haslett, E.Lansing CANOE/BOAT RENTAL - CLUBS - Grand River Canoe Rental: 301 Bush, Mason Harlow's Wacousta Canoe Rental: 9988 Riverside Dr., Eagle Raupp Campfitters: 2021 E. Michigan, Lansing American Legion: 112 S. Howard, Lansing; 48731 N. Clinton, Grand Ledge - - -. Captial City Old Car Club: 2373 W. Barnes, Mason Chief Okemos Sportsman's Club: 4667 Gunnell, Dimondale 4.20 CLUBS (cont.) City Club of Lansing: 213 S. Grand, Lansing Elks Home Lodge 534: 5334 S. Martin Luther King, Lansing Family Motorcycle Club: 1206 S. Washington, Lansing Jung Ski Club: 818 N. Hayford, Lansing Lansing Sailing Club: 6039 E. Lake Dr., Haslett Leiderkranz Club: 5828 S. Pennsylvania, Lansing Metropolitan Flying Club: 2216 E. Michigan, Lansing Michigan Trap Shooting Association: 1534 Service Rd., Mason Michigan State Grange: 1730 Chamberlain Way, Haslett Michigan Trap ShootingAssoc.: 1534 Service Rd., Mason Okemos Seahawks Aquatic Club: 1632 Alpha, Lansing Polish Home Federated: 1030 Mt. Hope, Lansing Rotary Club of Lansing: 417 Seymour, Lansing Tri-County Bicycle Assoc.: 5825 Oak Knoll, Lansing University Club of Michigan State: 3435 Forest Road, East Lansing V.F.W. Post 6034: 412 E. Main, Potterville V.F.W. Post 7309: 1243 Hull, Mason DANCE & GYMNASTICS - Academy of Dance Arts: 2224 E. Michigan, Lansing Ann's School of Dance: 3320 E. Lake Lansing, East Lansing - 4.21 DANCE & GYMNASTICS (cont.) - Assiff Studio of the Dance: 140 W. Grand River, East Lansing Bauer Nancie Dance Studio: 4301 Holt, Holt Bethany's Studio of Dance: 1723 W. grand River, Okemos Dance Central: 109 S. Main, Eaton Rapids Dance Fusion: 2018 N. Cedar, Holt Dance World: 16262 Chandler, E.Lansing Danzalot LLC: 1493 Haslett Rd., Haslett DeMellio Studio of Dance: 1115 N. Washington, Lansing Eastside Gymnastics: 1860 W. Grand River, Okemos Eastside Sheri's Studio: 1723 W. Grand River, Okemos Gedderts' Twistars USA Gymnastics Club:1475 Lake Lansing, Lansing Great Lakes Gymnastics: 1900 S. Cedar, Lansing Happendance Studio YWCA: 217 Townsend, Lansing Island Dance Centre: 224 S. Main, Lansing Karyn's Dance Place: 4462 Holt, Holt Lansing Dance Foundation: 2326 S. Cedar, Lansing McDowell School of Dance: 1400 W. Saginaw, Lansing Pressick Judi School: 4976 Northwind, E. Lansing Rising Star Studio: 526 Lentz, Lansing Studio de Dance: 1 l28 Michigan, East Lansing Tari's Cornerstone Studio: 1493 Haslett, Haslett 4.22 DANCE & GYMNASTICS (cont.) - Twistars USA Inc.: 9410 Davis Hwy., Dimondale Watson Patsy Dancing? School: 3222 S. Martin L. King, Jr. Blvd., Lansing Williams School of Dance: 128 W. Grand River, Williamston GOLF COURSES - MINIATURE Apple Sportsplex: 3700 Lansing Rd., Lansing DeWitt Family Golf Center: 11890 US-27, DeWitt Funtyme Adventure Park: 800 Hogback, Mason 6295 E. Saginaw, Grand Ledge Goldstar Recreation: 825 W. Grand River, Williamston King Par Golf. 1410 W. Grand River, Okemos Putt -Putt: 5801 S. Pennsylvania, Lansing WindRiver Adventure Golf. 5800 Park Lake Rd., East Lansing GOLF COURSES - PRACTICE RANGES - Applegate Golf Center: 2055 Towner, Haslett El Dorado: 3750 W. Howell, Mason Fourwinds: 5850 Park Lake, E. Lansing Funtyme Adventure Park: 800 Hogsback, Mason 6295 E. Saginaw, Grand Ledge Golf Gone Goofy: 1 l 890 US 27, DeWitt Highland Hills: 450 W. Alward, DeWitt King Par: 1410 W. Grand River, Okemos 4.23 GOLF COURSES - PRACTICE RANGES (cont.) - Lansing Golf Center: 5855 M-99, Diamondale Mason Hills: 2602 Tomlinson, Mason Royal Scot: 4722 W. Grand River, Lansing Timber Ridge: 16339 Park Lake, E. Lansing GOLF COURSES - PRIVATE - Country Club of Lansing: 2200 Moores River, Lansing Walnut Hills: 2874 Lake Lansing, E. Lansing GOLF COURSES —PUBLIC - Akers: Mt. Hope & S. Harrison, East Lansing Bonnie View: 311 N. Michigan, Eaton Rapids Branson Bay: 215 Branson Bay, Mason Brookshire Inn: 205 W. Church, Williamston Centennial Acres: 12479 Dow Road, Sunfield Chardell: 4646 Howe Rd., Bath Chisholm Hills C.C.: 2397 S. Washington, Holt Country Town: 9501 Ferris Rd., Springport El Dorado: 3750 W. Howell Rd., Mason Four Winds: 5850 Park Lake, E. Lansing Glenbrier: 4178 W. Locke, Perry Governors Club of Michigan LLC: 4036 S. Hagadorn, Okemos 4.24 GOLF COURSES - PUBLIC (cont.) - Grand Ledge C.C.: 5813 E. St. Joseph, Grand Ledge Highland Hills: 450 E. Alward, DeWitt Indian Hills: 4811 Nakoma, Okemos Ironwood Links: 742 N. Eifert, Mason Lake O' the Hills: 2101 LacDuMont, Haslett Ledge Meadows: 1801 Grand Ledge Hwy., Grand Ledge Maple Creek: 2300 W. Maple Rd., St. Johns Marion Oaks: 2255 Pinckney Rd., Howell Mason Hills: 2602 Tomlinson, Mason Oak Lane: N. Main, Webberville Pine Hills: 6603 N. Woodbury, Lainsburg Pine Lake: 1.018 Haslett Rd., Haslett Players Club: 925 S. Canal Rd., Grand Ledge Prairie Creek: 704 Web Road, DeWitt Royal Scot: 4722 W. Grand River, Lansing Timber Ridge: 16339 Park Lake, E. Lansing Twin Brook: 2200 Island Hwy, Charlotte Twin Oaks: 6345 N. US-27, St. Johns Wheatfield Valley: 1600 Linn Rd., Williamston HEALTH & FITNESS - Court One: 1609 Lake Lansing, Lansing 2291 Research Circle, Okemos 4.25 HEALTH & FITNESS (cont.) - MUSEUMS - Fitness USA: 5611 W. Saginaw, Lansing Gold's Gym: 906 Waverly, Lansing Hawaii Health Spa: 4979 Lansing Rd., Lansing Healthcor Fitness Center: 3315 E. Michigan, Lansing The Karate Club: 2011 N. East, Lansing Klub Kids: 1475 Lake Lansing, Lansing Michigan Athletic Club: 2900 Hannah, E. Lansing Mid -Michigan Academy of Martial Art: 5218 S. Martin Luther King, Lansing One on One Personal Training: 1711 W. Grand River, Okemos Powerhouse Gym: 2751 E. Grand River, E. Lansing World Gym: 2380 N. Cedar, Holt YMCA: Downtown Branch, 301 W. Lenawee, Lansing Oak Park Branch, 900 Long Blvd, Lansing Parkwood Branch, 2306 Haslett Rd, East Lansing Abrams Planetarium: MSU, E. Lansing Impression Five: 200 Museum Dr., Lansing Michigan Historical Museum: 717 W. Allegan, Lansing Michigan Museum of Surveying: 200 Museum Dr., Lansing MSU Kresge Art Gallery: MSU, East Lansing MSU Museum: W. Circle Dr., East Lansing Michigan Women's Museum & Hall of Fame: 213 Main Street, Lansing R.E. Olds Transportation Museum: 230 Museum Dr., Lansing 4.26 NATURE CENTERS - Audubon -Capitol Area: E. 2020 Mt. Hope, Lansing Woldumar Nature Center: 5539 Lansing Rd., Lansing SKATING RINKS/RENTAL - Apple Sportsplex: 3700 Lansing Rd., Lansing Arc Ice Sports: 2810 Hannah Blvd., East Lansing Edru Roller Skating Arena: 1891 S. Cedar, Holt Lansing Ice Arena: 1475 Lake Lansing Rd., Lansing Munn Ice Arena: Michigan State University, East Lansing The Summit: 9410 Davis Hwy, Dimondale THEATRES - CINEMA Celebration Cinema: 200 E. Edgewood Blvd., Lansing Eaton Theaters, 235 S. Cochran, Charlotte Elmwood Plaza 8 Theatres: 936 E. Mall Dr., Lansing Lansing Mall West Cinema: 921 W. Mall Dr., Lansing Meridian Theatres: Meridian Mall, 1999 Central Park Dr., Okemos Sun Theatre: 316 S. Bridge, Grand Ledge THEATRES - PERFORMING ARTS All of Us Express - Childrens: 2495 N. Cedar, Holt Boarshead: 425 S. Grand, Lansing Lansing Civic Planers Guild: 2300 E. Michigan, Lansing t 4.27 THEATRES - PERFORMING ARTS (cont.) - Lansing Community College: 401 N. Capitol, Lansing Players Guild of Eaton County: 5361 Lansing Rd., Potterville Riverwalk Theatre: 200 Museum Dr., Lansing Spotlight Theatre: 3808 E. Grand Ledge Hwy., Grand Ledge Wharton Center: Michigan State University, East Lansing 4.28 Regional Parks and Recreation Facilities SLEEPY HOLLOW STATE PARK, State of Michigan Sleepy Hollow State Park is located in Clinton County on Price Road off from US-27, near St. Johns and Laingsburg. The park is operated by the Michigan Department ofNatural Resources (DNR), and contains over 2600 acres, with a 410 acre lake, Lake Ovid, which was developed from the Little Maple River. The Park has a modern campground with 181 sites and restroom accommodations. Also available is a rustic youth organization site for youth groups, scouts and church and school group use. The camp sites are within a short walk to the park's beach area. Day use facilities at the park include a 1/2 mile beach with beach house and concessions, shelters and picnicking, play equipment, restroom facilities, ballfields, trails for hiking and mountain biking, groomed cross-country ski trails, and activities such as snowmobiling, hunting and trapping (during appropriate seasons) and year round bird watching. Sleepy Hollow is also the site of the annual Indian Pow -Wow, hosted by the Lansing North American Center. ROSE LAKE WILDLIFE RESEARCH AREA, State of Michigan Rose Lake Wildlife Research Area is located in Bath and Woodhull Townships off ofUpton and Stoll Roads. The park is operated by the Michigan DNR containing Rose Lake, Potter Lake and a portion of Mud Lake. Existing facilities provide opportunities to study wildlife habitats, and activities such as hunting, snowmobiling, cross-country skiing and trails for hiking and mountain biking. Most of the facilities provide limited access. Parking and roadways are around the perimeter with facilities located in the middle. BIRCHFIELD PARK AND RIVERBEND NATURAL AREA, Ingham County Birchfield Park contains the Riverbend Natural Area within it, making Birchfield Park the largest in Ingham County. The park contains 539 acres and is located along the central western edge of the county, south of Lansing between Diamondale and Holt, along the Grand River. The land is mostly wooded with some grass areas. McNamara Landing is a small parcel immediately south ofBirchfield Park, which functions as a canoe landing. McNamara Landing is state owned land, however, Ingham County has a long-term operating agreement for this parcel. 4.29 Existing features include: a softball diamond, bank and boat fishing, a beach, canoe rental, hiking trails, horseshoe pits, nature day camp, pedal boat rental, picnic grounds & shelters, playgrounds, volleyball courts, a stocked fishing pond, cross-country skiing with rentals and lessons, ice skating, sledding, tobogganing and a warming lodge & snack bar. HAWK ISLAND PARK, Ingham County Hawk Island Park an Ingham County Park currently under development. The park is located in the city limits of Lansing, north of Cavanaugh Road between Aurelius and Pennsylvania. The north end of this park connects to Scott Woods, a City of Lansing Park. The park is under construction and was the former Solomon Gravel Pits. Construction will continue until the year 2001. Portions of the park will be opened in 2000, with the bulk of the park opening after the completion of construction in 2001. The lake will remain as an amenity to the park. Proposed facilities at the park include a beach and bath house, boat rental, fishing with the lake stocked, picnic grounds and shelters, playgrounds, volleyball courts, ball diamonds, trails, a winter sports rental area and cross-country skiing extending through park and cooperatively with the city into Scott Woods Park and the Sycamore Golf Course. There will also be walkways installed on Cavanaugh Road leading to the park. LAKE LANSING PARK - SOUTH, Ingham County Lake Lansing Park - South contains 30 acres and is located at the northeast corner of Lake Lansing and Marsh Roads in Meridian Township. The park is formerly the site of a popular amusement park. The old carousel building was preserved and remains on location. The park is very popular during the warm months because of its sandy swimming beach. Overcrowding is typical during warm weekends with swimmers and boaters. Currently, the County Parks Department owns and leases out the house at the southwest end of the property. Access to the picnic shelter is paved and also handicap accessible. Existing facilities include: a beach and bath house, horseshoe pits, pedal boat rental, picnic grounds and shelter, playgrounds and tricycle track, shuffleboard courts, snack bar, volleyball courts, and ice fishing. LAKE LANSING PARK - NORTH, Ingham County Lake Lansing Park - North consists of 411 acres of land and is operated by Ingham County Parks Department. It is located to the northeast of Lake Lansing in Meridian Township, with a majority of the park lying north of Lake Drive. Only a small boat launch links Lake Lansing Park - North with Lake Lansing. A good portion of the park is wooded upland consisting of mature oaks and maples. 4.30 Much of the park is marshlands, consisting of pine plantations and transitional field grasses. Existing facilities include: softball diamonds, a boat launch, hiking trails and boardwalks, horseshoe pits, nature study area, picnic grounds and shelters, playgrounds, volleyball courts, cross-country skiing and rentals, ice fishing and winter warming lodge. FITZGERALD PARK, Eaton, County Fitzgerald Park is a 78 acre park operated by the Eaton County Parks and Recreation Commission. It is located at 133 Fitzgerald Park Drive in Grand Ledge along the Grand River, and is on top of ancient sedimentary rocks known as the'Ledges.' The park offers picnicking, trails, aNature Center, ball diamonds, volleyball, basketball, horseshoes, a playground, and disc golf. The park also rents canoes and cross-country skis seasonally. Naturalist services are offered at the park, by the Eaton County Parks and Recreation Commission's Park Naturalist, for civic groups, school groups, and any other organization. These services include presentations on ecology (i.e. trees, plants, wildlife, natural history). LINCOLN BRICK PARK, Eaton County Lincoln Brick Park is historically named after the decade of brick production that once took place on the site. The park is located just north of Grand Ledge on Tallman Road, one mile west of M-100 off State Road. The park consists of 90 acres and is positioned just across the river from Fitzgerald Park. The park is composed of a variety of habitats from woodlands and open meadows to over 6,000 feet of scenic river frontage. The park provides pavilions and picnicking, a tot lot, nature trails, cross country skiing, fishing, an archery range and diversified wildlife. The park has proposed developments which would provide access across the Grand River to Fitzgerald Park. HARRIS NATURE CENTER, Meridian Township Harris Nature Center is a proposed center which will be located at 3998 Vanatta Road and it will be operated by Meridian Township's Parks and Recreation Department. The properties combining to become Harris Nature Center total just over 200 acres with an existing structure on site. The proposed development consists of the renovation of the existing building into the visitor center, as rooms will be made larger and accessibility standards will be met. More trails will also be established, and with the property's close proximity to the Red Cedar River, most programs will focus around the river. The proposed nature center is scheduled to be opened to the public in late 1995. 4.31 WOLDUMAR NATURE CENTER, Nature Way Association Woldumar Nature Center was established in 1966 when a land donation of 177 acres was made to the Nature Way Association; the governing body of Woldumar. It is located at 5539 Lansing Road, in Lansing. The Nature Way Association is a private, non-profit educational organization, providing outdoor education to 15,00 school children annually. The nature center provides educational trail system through woodlands, fields, orchards, and along the Grand River. 4.32 IN w w STATE RECREATION LAND COUNTYPARK REGIONAL COMPOSITE OF RECREATIONAL LANDS Barrier -Free Compliance Status DESCRIPTION OF COMMUNITY'S BARRIER -FREE COMPLIANCE STATUS The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became effective for public and private providers of recreation, leisure and entertainment on January 26, 1992. Various regulations have been issued for the implementation of this civil rights law, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability. Among those regulation authorized by the Act are regulations regarding the accessible design of recreation facilities and outdoor developed recreation areas. Access to recreation facilities and outdoor developed areas is a valuable right for people with and without disabilities. In response to the Americans with Disabilities Act in the early 1990's, the Lansing City Council passed the following resolution: Resolution by the City Council of the City of Lansing: WHEREAS, the Federal Government has enacted legislation (P.L. 101-136) to protect the rights of people with disabilities called Americans with Disabilities Ace (ADA); and WHEREAS, ADA requires the removal of all barriers that would hinder the availability of services, facilities, programs and activities to people with disabilities; and WHEREAS, ADA also requires municipalities to 1)provide public notice of intent to comply, 2) identify an employee responsible for the coordination of compliance and to handle complaints of alleged violations, and 3) establish a system for the resolution of complaints alleging non-compliance all by January 26, 1992; and WHEREAS, ADA requires municipalities to perform a self evaluation of services, programs, activities and facilities to determine where barriers exist and how they can be overcome by January 26, 1993; and WHEREAS, ADA requires municipalities to prepare a transition plan containing specifications for the removal of all structural barriers by July 26, 1993. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lansing City Council supports the objectives of the ADA legislation and pledges to work with the Mayor in complying with all ADA requirements and deadlines. Certified Therapeutic Recreation Specialist. The Parks and Recreation Department employs a full-time Certified Therapeutic Recreation Specialist (CTRS) to develop and implement programs for people with disabilities in the Greater Lansing area. The CTRS also acts as a liaison to the department to facilitate issues and concerns from the public. The programs target different age ranges, from youth to adult, and disability characteristics. 4.34 EVALUATION OF ACCESSIBILITY OF EXISTING FACILITIES The City of Lansing has been updating it's facilities each year to provide barrier -free access to the people with disabilities throughout our park system. Many facilities have been greatly improved, but continued renovation to improve accessibility is still required. Support for continued renovation and new barrier -free developments can be found in the Parks and Recreation Demographic Plan and the Access Focus Group report. The Lansing Parks and Recreation Department utilized a checklist, developed by the department. These checklists were developed from the DNR Assessment Tool Forms from the past ADA Transition Plan, 1993-1997. The forms were modified to include changes that have taken place since 1992 when the they were first used to assess Lansing's Park System for ADA compliance. Park sites were inspected by maintenance personnel and focus group chairs. The first site inspection was done in combination with one of our department Landscape Architects, Tanya Moore, and our department Certified Therapeutic Recreation Specialist (CTRS), Joan Lenhard. This was done to insure accurate information and clarify specific items that were important. When all the checklists were completed, the "inspector" met with Tanya Moore and Phil Dorland, Deputy Director for the department. During these meetings, a project list was developed, the "Master Project" list noting all deficiencies with ADA in the Park System. EVALUATION OF ACCESSIBILITY OF EXISTING PROGRAMS The development of programs and activities for the department will be in providing inclusive .opportunities, as well as programs, for people with disabilities. Registration processes and forms, or modifications will be overseen by the CTRS when and where appropriate, the CTRS will provide educational materials and inservices to Parks, Forestry and Recreation staff, both full-time and part-time, contractual and seasonal. The department should establish an education and training session that is reviewed by all new employees and reviewed yearly by all members of the department for updates. New information or rulings in court procedures may have direct impact on services for the department. If everyone is knowledgeable about these events a consensus to change and grow could be vital in the department's expansion and growth and it will assist us and ensure that all people will have access to programs, activities, facilities and parks. The process for requests on accommodations should be reviewed by the CTRS and staff who supervise the programs. Recommendations can be made for accommodations after contact with the person who made the request. The department will make a strong, concerted effort to work with our local hospitals, rehabilitators, special educators, special interest groups and agencies that provide services to people with disabilities. These liaisons will continue to provide us with input from people with 4.35 disabilities. The disabled are actively pursuing the quality of life and, as providers, we are able to provide access to those opportunities. Existing programs include: Leisure Education, day camps, sports, crafts, cultural, seasonal and special events. Individuals are encouraged to participate in all city programs. The request and need for additional programs and service are rising. The city needs to develop a strategy that addresses the needs of people with disabilities at that population continues to expand and services are not growing at the same rate as other programs and services in general recreation. - COMPLETION OF A TRANSITION PLAN TO ADDRESS IDENTIFIED ACCESSIBILITY ISSUES An Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan was developed in 1992-93 targeting barriers in the City of Lansing Park and Recreation System that hinder the availability of services, facilities, programs and activities to people with disabilities. The production of the 1993-1997 ADA Transition Plan for the City of Lansing Parks & Recreation Department was a cooperative effort between the city's Certified Therapeutic Recreation Specialist, Landscape Architect, other city staff and the State of Michigan. The plan reviewed the Lansing Parks System and its facilities in terms of accessibility standards. The plan, up until now, has been a separate document, a stand alone document; it is now combined into this Five Year Parks & Recreation Master Plan. IMPLEMENTATION OF METHODS TO ADDRESS BARRIER -FREE ISSUES IN THE DESIGN AND PLANNING OF NEW FACILITIES AND PROGRAMS The department seeks to provide an overall comprehensive approach in providing both structured and unstructured recreational opportunities which are accessible to all. The projected capital improvement projects are described in the Action Plan, Section 5 and are proposed to be implemented to facilities throughout our park system. The action plan is based on our "Master Project" list (see appendix E) and other city priorities. The "Master Project" list, once developed, was prioritized according to the modified City Council priorities adopted with the 1994-95 budget, see pages appendix E, pages E.2 - E.3. Site selection and order of project completion is based on this list as well as available funds. The "Master Project" list itemizes deficiencies which presently exist in our park system. The capital improvements schedule, found in Section 5, outlines proposed project scheduling, the project cost and source of funds. In addition to the facility development, the city must expand programs to include signage, video, audio and/or CD for access. The city needs to go beyond the physical access and develop the access for the experience. 4.36 ACCESSIBILITY ISSUES AT EXISTING FACILITIES ADDRESSED Internal Complaint Procedure: As a complaint is filed with the department, the acting designee will review the complaint and will notify the appropriate personnel within the City of Lansing of the complaint. The complainant may file a grievance with the Parks and Recreation Department, Human Relations and Community Services Department, the Department of Justice or Department of Interior, both at the federal level. When contact is made at the federal level, a representative from the federal government usually makes contact with the local unit of government and tries to have the local unit of government resolve the issue prior to action at the federal level (see pages 4.40 - 4.41). Projects at Facilities addressing Accessibility Issues: The City of Lansing has been updating it's facilities each year to provide barrier -free access to people with disabilitie throughout our park system. Our 1993-97 transition plan addressed specific projects; according to that list, the following projects have been completed: BECK PARK - accessible playground provided with walks CLIFFORD PARK - accessible tennis court, and playground provided with walks connected to the newly accessible paved parking lot. COMSTOCK PARK - accessible playground provided with walks DAVIS PARK - accessible playground provided with walks, accessible picnic tables provided, tennis court fencing installed with openings at least 36", installed handicap parking spaces with signage on the west end of the park. FENNER - accessible trail loops provided, parking lot paved with ADA accessibility to building, picnic area, and trails. FOREST VIEW PARK - accessible playground provided with walks to parking area FRANCES PARK - accessible playground provided with walks to the parking area, accessible walks provided from pavilion to parking, pavilion and overlook renovations have taken place to provide access, handicap parking spaces are designated, the maintenance garage was constructed. GlEl? PARK- concession building and plaza area renovated to provide accessibility in the building and to the ball diamonds and parking area. GROESBECK GOLF COURSE - new shelters have been installed, the rinse/fill pad has been updated, and the clubhouse renovations are complete, and 9 holes have been renovated with a cart path. HILLBORN PARK - accessible playground provided with walks HIIN7TR PARK - accessible playground provided with walks from parking area INGHAM PARK - accessible playground provided with walks MOORES PARK - accessible playground provided with walks to parking area, pavilion and restrooms. PO77EY PARK - accessible playground provided with walks, accessible picnic tables and grills provided, pavilion #2 and #3 are accessible, the new restroom/ concession building in the zoo is accessible, the farmyard was constructed and is accessible, 4.37 and the new entrance plaza is under construction and will be fully accessible. RIVERFRONT PARK - accessible playground provided with walks RIVERPOINT PARK - accessible playground provided with walks connecting the accessible pavilion, dock and parking areas, picnic tables in the shelter are accessible. RIVF,RTRAIL - all new sections of the RiverTrail are accessible ST. JOSEPH PARK - accessible playground provided with walks, tennis court repairs, a paved parking lot connecting the restroom building. - TURNER DODGE HOUSE - renovations have taken place at Turner -Dodge only to the exterior of the structure. The first floor is fully accessible by the ramp in the rear. WASHINGTON PARK - accessible playground provided with walks connecting the parking area, a new indoor skating rink was constructed which is accessible, the restrooms were renovated also. In addition to the projects listed in the 1993-97 ADA Transition Plan, the following other updates have been accomplished: Workplace - the Parks & Recreation offices were moved from city hall in 1998 and are fully accessible to the disabled. The city installed a TDD system. Community Centers - Three of the city's community centers, Foster, Gier, and Letts, have been renovated with accessible features. Zoo - All of the exhibits at Potter Park Zoo are accessible. Fenner Nature Center - Fenner Nature Center has been renovated and the upstairs is accessible. The parking lot, and trails have been made accessible. Park Pai,ilionns/Restroom. facilities - Pavilions at Frances Park, Potter Park, Cooley Gardens, Moores Park, Riverpoint Park, have been made accessible. Restroom I acilities - Restroom facilities have been renovated for accessability at Fenner Nature Center, Foster Community Center, Frances Park, Grand River Park, Moores Park, Potter Park and Potter Park Zoo, and Washington Park. Pla) �grounnd s - Since 1994, the city has been upgrading their playgrounds. Of our 107 parks, there are still approximately 20 playgrounds which need updating for playground standards as well as handicap accessibility. Swimming pools (Aquatic facilities) - Moores .Park Pool had accessible steps installed and pool bathhouse made accessible. Boat launch, facilities - Grand River Park has been renovated with new accessible facilities including restrooms, launch, parking and docking. 4.38 Other amenities (benches, tables, spectator seating, etc.) - The city has made a concentrated effort to provide accessible amenities at all of our parks with our tables, benches, drinking fountains and trash receptacles. 4.39 CITY OF LANSING PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ADA INTERNAL COMPLAINT PROCEDURE FORM INSTRUCTIONS 1. Contact the department designee. They will explain the options and procedures to the complaintant. They will notify the appropriate personnel within the City of Lansing of a complaint. 2. Within fifteen (15) working days of receiving a complaint, a meeting with the appropriate staff within the city will take place in a round table discussion, including the complaintant. Within fifteen (15) working days, recommendations or esolution will be handed down by the department head. 4. The complaintant will be notified, in text, at a meeting as to what the recommendations are. If they are not satisfied, they will be notified of other options for them to pursue. 5. The complaint form needs to be returned to the department designee. 4.40 COMPLAINT PROCEDURE FORM DAY PHONE EVENING PHONE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE Please state clearly the conditions of the facility, program and/or activity in which you perceive non -compliant with the ADA. Other formats may be used (i.e. audio, visual, telephone, etc). List any wilnesses: Name Name Phone # Phone # Please rehurn form to: Joan Lenhard, CTRS City of Lansing, Parks & Recreation Department 200 N. Foster Lansing, MI 48912 4.41 SECTION 5 ACTION PLAN ACTION PLAN ACTION PROGRAM This section of the plan describes the future actions anticipated by the Parks and Recreation Department. It includes the purpose of the plan, the goals and objectives, the capital improvements schedule and the action program rationale. The rationale will provide linkage between the focus group reports, staff discussions, interviews, Park Board meetings, opinion surveys, citizen input, public hearings and the staff's professional judgement. Goals and Objectives: Based on our findings throughout the planning process the department administration has formulated the following goals and objectives to address the needs of the community. I. Promote and enhance the financial stability of the Lansing parks by generating funding through the following sources: A. General Fund The general fund is the major source of funding for a parks and recreation system. Appropriations from the general fund are voted on by the City Council as part of the Charter established budget process. The Parks and Recreation Department will strive to convince the Mayor and Council that the need for sustained or enhanced funding is necessary to adequately serve the residents of Lansing with our park system. The department currently receives 9.3 percent of the total city's general fund budget. B. 1 mill tax renewal Renewal of the dedicated one mill for five years is a top priority for the Parks and Recreation Department. The Director of the Parks and Recreation Department and Park Board believe that the public needs to be given an opportunity on August 8, 2000 to renew the one mill dedicated for parks improvements for the next five years (2001-2006). Following is a brief history of the millage program. a. The purpose of the millage is to be able to continue essential replacements and/or repairs to facilities and to provide the support necessary to implement these improvements. b. The millage was introduced in 1990 and renewed again in 1995 as part of the Lansing five-year parks and recreation plan. Its successful adoption and implementation has provided funding for numerous capital projects and has greatly improved many facilities in the Lansing park system. For many years the city allocated limited dollars for capital projects. This coupled with the prioritization process used by the city's financial staff resulted in limited dollars for the Parks and Recreation capital program. 5.1 C. Revenue Sharing The Parks and Recreation Department needs to pursue state and federal funding sources that assist in providing recreation opportunities to city residents. D. Grants from Federal, State and Local Sources 1. Traditionally, matching funds were difficult to obtain for park purposes due to competition from other city needs. The millage allows greater flexibility to seek grants and other matching sources of revenue. If the millage is approved by the voters, funds will be available as match money to parlay local funds with grant funds and accomplish more capital improvement projects. The first park millage generated $7.5 million tax dollars and was leveraged by grants and donations to total $11.5 million in projects. E. Bonds, Loans, Gifts and Endowments 1. The donation of gifts, loans or other contributions toward maintaining and developing the park system needs to be encouraged for specific projects. 2. Bonds and loans may be pursued for initial start up capital to create revenue generating facilities. F.. Sale of Lands for Reinvestment Opportunities The Park Board has evaluated its dedicated park lands that are surplus or deemed unusable or inappropriate and have concluded that some are not presently serving the citizens of Lansing. To sell dedicated park land the City Charter requires that the matter be voted on by the citizens of Lansing. The sale of selected lands will generate revenues that may be used for acquisition and development based on the December 10, 1979 City Council policy. (p. 2.3-2.6) G. User Fees 1. The Parks and Recreation Department could develop more facilities and programs that have user fees to supplement the cost of developing and operating the facility and/or program. 2. Raise current user fees to programs which are under -funded. II. Maintain, assess, develop, and preserve the park lands and facilities in order to provide for the needs of present and future generations. 5.2 A. To provide systematic and effective maintenance by: 1. Improving general maintenance practices at all facilities with regard to equipment upgrades, staff/user safety and accessibility. 2. Creating general maintenance plans, as well as master plans for the future needs of park areas, including but not limited to a new park maintenance and operational facility, infrastructure and/or facility replacement & repair and other necessary maintenance facility improvements. 3. Enhancing the care of existing trees/street beautification through: a. Restoring staffing levels. b. Developing city tree nursery stock/supplies. c. Finding another site for a permanent forestry nursery. 4. Improving the inventory and management of park facilities by providing a computerized network for tracking and retrieving information about park facilities. The computer system will allow for accurate record keeping of parkland size, facility conditions and maintenance equipment throughout the system. This will allow the city to project life cycle costing. 5. Continuing to promote the Adopt -A -Park program. 6. Paying seasonal and part-time staff with competitive wages to compete with private business. B. To routinely assess park lands for acquisition/expansion, disposal and/or leasing by: 1. Studying specific demographic trends that may correspond to the generation of recreation services within a geographical target area. 2. Developing feasibility studies for park land that may be unique in recreation resources or experiences and could provide revenue through user fees, leases or other types of revenue sharing. a. Ranney, Scott Art and Garden Center, Turner Dodge, Potter Park Zoo, Waverly Golf Course, Louis F. Adado/Riverfront Park, to suggest a few. 3. Preparing master plans for parks in need of development, transition or renovation. Examples of such parks include, but are not limited to: a. Louis F. Adado/Riverfront, Bancroft, Burchard, Crego, Davis, Everett, Glen Eden, Grand River, Hillsdale, Holly, Kimberly, McKinch, Munn, Osborn, Quentin, Ranney and Reasoner. 4. Placing park infrastructure data onto electronic data base. C. To continue with efforts of meeting accessibility requirements. The City produced an ADA (American Disabilities Act) Study of which recommendations will continue to be followed. Project Play, a neighborhood program designed to purchase and install play equipment, signifies a major commitment by the city to provide safe and accessible play equipment which meets the latest accessibility and playground standards of the industry. Similar efforts 5.3 shall be continued to upgrade structures and buildings within the system. D. To encourage the preservation of Lansing's natural systems/features, cultural elements, historic attractions and education interpretation opportunities. l . Provide a balance between the reasonable use and preservation of the existing natural features within the city. Features of prime importance include but are not limited to: the Mason Esker which runs through Oak Park and Bancroft Park, the climax forest of Scott Woods, the wetland and woodlands of Crego Park, Fenner Nature Center and Shubel Park and many of the woods, glens, streams, waterfront and open spaces within the city. Careful planning needs to be undertaken when addressing these sensitive ecologically important areas. 2. Continue the preservation efforts to restore, reuse and adapt many of our cultural and historic buildings, structures and memorials. Some of the more prominent features include: the Turner -Dodge House, Scott Art & Garden Center, Cooley Gardens, Frances Overlook and Gardens, the Olds Memorial, Durant, Ferris and Reutter Parks. Continue to advocate feasibility studies and systematic planning efforts to revitalize or replace the cultural assets such as historic or noteworthy buildings or structures within the system. 3. Provide for the education and interpretation of facilities and structures of importance within the city. Such areas include the natural features, historic structures and areas of artistic beauty. A welcoming center at the Scott Art and Garden Center may be among the new innovative ideas regarding this topic, enhancing the interpretation of the woodland trail at Frances Park or providing historic interpretation and work study projects with students of Lansing Community College at Durant, Reutter, Cooley Gardens, Turner Dodge or others. E. To continue physical development projects currently underway and new innovative projects in the future. l . The department will continue the development of the River Trail throughout the city's river system. The goal is to provide a continuous trail system adjacent to the rivers within the city and to allow connection to neighboring communities such as Lansing Township and Delta Township to the west and Delhi Township to the south. Specific links proposed during this five year plan include but are not limited to the sections from Louis F. Adado/Riverfront Park to Cherry Hill Park, Potter Park Zoo to the new Ingham County, Hawk Island Park, the segment from Hawk Island Park south to the Poyet Parcel being purchased by the city and on to Delhi Township (also connected to Hope Soccer Complex), the segment from Moores Park to Grand River Park and the continuation of the northwest leg from Dietrich Park along the Grand River to Tecumseh Park and on to Grand Woods Park in Delta Township. 2. The department will encourage the development of other significant projects along the river that will provide residents access to and use of the water resources and adjacent park lands. Examples of projects include, but are not limited to: Potter 5.4 Park Zoo erosion control measures, Crego Park with the development of River Trail access, fishing and other family related facilities and Cherry Hill boat launch, docking facility and parking lot improvements. 3. The department will continue the development of its regional facilities such as Potter Park and Zoo, Fenner Nature Center, the River Trail, Frances Park and Gardens, Washington Park Ice Complex, Turner Dodge House Restoration, Louis F. Adado/Riverfront Park, and its downtown parks that service Michigan's tourists. These regional facilities represent the Lansing park system to local residents as well as tourists. Efforts must be made to create quality facilities and programs at these facilities for they will leave lasting impressions on the visitors to these parks. 4. The department will develop and enhance the existing golf courses within the park system. Each of the four golf courses produce revenues that offset their operating costs. The residents of Lansing enjoy relatively low user fees and high recreational value that these facilities provide. Each of the courses will need continued capital improvements to sustain or to improve the level of quality currently provided. Flooding from the Sycamore Creek reduces the number of days that Sycamore . Golf Course can operate. The department and Ingham County Drain Commissioner have initiated discussions to improve drainage in the Sycamore water basin. III. Promote the development of new recreation programs with active sports facilities and passive leisure opportunities which are in high demand, or are innovative, unique or not presently provided by municipal or private sectors. A. To identify recreation/leisure program resources. l . Produce a programming review and restructure activities as necessary to provide residents with convenient, appropriate opportunities. 2. Present alternative funding and staffing sources that will accompany any new program or service 3. Identify other recreational resources and potential for sharing programs with other city or non -city affiliated facilities, such as Ingham County, the Lansing School District, or Oldsmobile Park (completely accessible park/stadium). 4. Identify strategies for improved services and/or funding of existing regional facilities. The potential for regional funding of specific park lands may offer better services and provide a more stable funding base. An example might include the regionalization of Potter Park Zoo. B. To assess existing facilities as to their suitability for programming purposes. l . Prior to the development of new facilities or programs, assessment of existing service potential should be seriously considered and evaluated. 2. Study the re -design or renovation of existing facilities to accommodate recreation activities requested by the public before developing new facilities. 5.5 3. Examine methods to increase or enhance programs for existing facilities, such as "Kids Kamp," teen, senior and other needed programs. C. To monitor service and participation levels for future planning efforts. 1. Formulate and compile user records and numbers in a quantified format, as with a computer database, to assist in determining participation rates and proposed trends. IV. Promote interaction, involvement, and communication between the Parks and Recreation Department, the citizens of Lansing and surrounding communities. A. To develop partnerships/coalitions with community groups and educational institutions and churches. 1. Create new or re-establish councils or committees for program assistance, such as with Forestry, Senior, Special Events, Riverfront and Regional groups. 2. Encourage and support an annual or semi-annual conference or meeting between community groups and departmental divisions. 3. Develop coordination and communication with recreational facilities at local educational institutions such as Lansing School District, Michigan State University and Lansing Community College, and the YMCA, YWCA, Big Brothers/Big Sisters or with other support programs such as LYRF. 4. Continue to work with the Lansing Neighborhood Council in developing a communication network to identify and meet specific park and recreation needs, such as Neighborhoods in Bloom, the Adopt -A -Park Program, and other neighborhood projects and programs. 5. Cooperate with the Police, City Attorney, Planning, Fire, and Human Relations and Community Services Departments to expand neighborhood response teams. B. To implement quality management principles at all levels. 1. Develop marketing reports, cost analysis and feasibility studies of any proposed or existing activities prior to committing to a new facility or program. 2. Ascertain and maintain adequate department staff and facilities to accommodate the existing and future needs of park users by providing enough professional and volunteer assistance. 3. Supplement the department's park research and design staff with outside consulting services to update site plans. Updated site plans will guide park renovation projects to meet the needs of Lansing residents. 4. Evaluate job satisfaction and personnel relations through structured staff workshops emphasizing existing problems and opportunities. 5.6 C. To acknowledge the importance of public input and contact with community leaders. 1. Establish a simple, yet logical communication system between the users/public, their group leaders/coaches and the city's staff/supervisors. 2. Initiate a recommended program for training all public assistance personnel, such as coaches, umpires and activity leaders. 3. Identify division/staff members to interface with groups throughout the city. 4. Continue to work with the Lansing Police Department to establish a partnership between the neighborhoods, police officers and Parks and Recreation Department to prevent crime and promote self esteem of residents within the neighborhoods. It is vital that the parks offer adequate security and a feeling of safety when in the park or on the River Trail. This is a paramount concern expressed by many community groups and committee reports. Efforts need to be made as soon as possible to reinforce the perception of clean and safe parks. D. To improve the public image and marketing efforts of the parks system. l . Actively address concerns for public safety, access and preservation within park areas through public needs analysis evaluations and implementation efforts. 2. Develop ways to measure effectiveness of marketing efforts at various stages of promotion. 3. Increase user awareness of the parks system with exhibit displays, location maps/entry signs and promotional materials. 4. Identify the market segment Lansing desires to attract through tourism efforts and develop a strategy to promote tourism within facilities such as Potter Park Zoo, Frances Park, the River Trail, Turner -Dodge House and Fenner Nature Center. 5. Revitalize advertising efforts for the department with all media opportunities to introduce and invite the public to experience their natural and recreational resources. 6. Update the city's web page on a regular basis with current, interesting and valuable information. E. To develop shared visions for regional possibilities and to implement regional solutions when feasible. 1. Work with the Potter Park Zoological Society and the tri-county area to develop a regional zoo that will allow for a larger, more stable tax base to operate and renovate older exhibits and develop new exhibits. 2. Work with Ingham County to develop regional park and trail systems. 3. Work with surrounding communities on common recreational program opportunities. 4. Develop a tri-county map showing park and recreation facilities. 5.7 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT PARKS FIVE YEAR MASTER PLAN (0310112000 thru 02/2812005) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE -POTENTIAL GRANT SUPPORTED PROJECTS MAP LOCATION PROJECT Tar et Year Target Year Target Year Target Year Target Yea Target Year Grant Est. Grant KEY 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Source Amount A RIVER TRAIL along Spring St.- reroute trail off of street. Gain easement from S & S Dye and construct new sectk n 260.000 MNRTF 195,000 B RIVER TRAIL RIVER TRAIL acquire Con rail R.O.W. - north leg develop from MI Ave. to Cherry HIII Park leg, replace boardwalk along the S. Grand Parking Gereg 3 200,000 750,000 MNRTF MNRTF 150,000 562.500 C D RIVER TRAIL develop leg from Shiawassee St. to MI Ave. Ottawa Power Plant & Wentworth Park 600,000 MNRTF 450.000 E RIVER TRAIL develop from Potter Park to Hawk Island County Park 1.900,000 MNRTF 1,425,000 F RIVER TRAIL develop Hawk Island to Hope Soccer Complex leg 2,410.000 MNRTF 1,807.500 G RIVER TRAIL deveb Moores Park to Grand River Park leg 1.800.000 MNRTF 1,350,000 H RIVER TRAIL connect Fenner to river trail from Aurelius 200,000 MNRTF 150,000 J CHERRY HILL renovate launch 3 dock 60,000 FISH 30,000 K COOLEY river trail access 240,000 MNRTF 180.000 L CREGO park Improvements(develop masterplan— - passive day use ark; fishing, boating, trails, picnicking, etc. `" 200,000 2,000.000 MNRTF 1,650.000 M DAVIS, BENJAM park Im rovements tennis, light 2 bell fields, park lot, restroom/concession, basketball, add 3rd so tball field 1.100,000 LWCF 825,000 N HUNTER park Improvements(develop master plan - water park/pool, deck & concession building, parking, e c. 100,000 350.000 3,500,000 NCF / UPAR 2,887,500 P KIRCHER park Improvements restroom/concesslon building, parking lot, fencing, etc. 600,000 BOND 450,000 R MOORES shoreline Improvements Install fishing lers,addhional parking, shoreline stabilization 350,000 282,500 S RANNEY Implement 1999 master plan proposals 10,000 137,000 682.800 __FISH/MNRTF 682,800 MNRTF 1,126,950 TOTAL GRANT 0 225,000 1,527,750 3,869.600 3,137,100 4,762,500 13,521,950 IST. LOCAL MATCH 10,000 95,000 509,250 1,363.200 1,045,700 1,587,500 4.610,650 TOTALS 10,000 320.0001 2,037,000 5,232,800, 4,182,8001 6,350,0001 18,132.600 Note: Project location maps are Included under Appendb(H Crego Master Plan to be done by Parks & Recreation Staff N Grant Codes: MNRTF-Dept. of Natural Resources Trust Fund 00 LWCF-Dept. of Natural Resources Land & Water Conservation Fund BOND -Dept. of Natural Resources Recreation Bond ISTEA-MI Dept. of Transportation - Inter model Surface Transportation Efficiency Act FISH -Dept. of Natural Resources - Waterways - Fisheries Grant UPARR@Urban Park & Recreation Recovery 02/15/00 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE 19,132,600 13.521.950 ACTION PROGRAM RATIONALE Throughout the planning process, it was found that Lansing's Park System is in need of major restoration and more daily maintenance. Considerable renovation to this vital infrastructure is required in the form of paving roads and sidewalks, tennis courts and basketball courts. Also needed are landscaping, play fields, benches, tables, playground equipment, bleachers, and other park features. Considerable funding will be required to return these parks to their original planned service level and beauty. All of the city's needs, regardless of their inclusion on the above listing, will be positively impacted by providing customer service in a friendly manner. This may include adding trained staff, recruiting more volunteers or hiring outside/private services. Many of the committees stated a need for staffing and/or increased personnel training and education. The formulation of specific interest committees was also listed by more than one group as being important for interaction and communication with the city's population. A first class operation must be maintained by the Parks and Recreation Department in all divisions from staffing and programming to facility maintenance and accessibility. In striving to meet the mission of the department, quality of service is a definite priority. To accomplish these goals, the department will take the following actions: ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL The City of Lansing has extensive land holdings which have been placed under the specific jurisdiction of the Parks and Recreation Department. These properties fall under the department's jurisdiction through ordinances, specific dedications as city parks by resolution of the City Council, deed restrictions or leases by the city. Acquisition of park lands is through direct purchase, lease, acquisition due to back taxes or through gifts to the city. The Michigan Constitution (Article 7, Section 23), City Charter (Chapter 8) and Chapter 208 of the City ordinances governs the purchases and sales of property. No park, recreation, cemetery or waterfront shall be sold without the approval, by a majority vote of the electors of the City voting on the question at a regular or special election. As real property is acquired, the Mayor shall designate whether or not it shall be added to the written inventory. December 10, 1979 the City Council adopted a Park Land Policy dealing with acquisition, development, encroachment and disposal. June 22, 1981 the City Council adopted a resolution designating various city properties as park land. See Section 2 for a more complete description of the ordinances and policies. Please refer to Section 4, Recreation Inventory, for current land holdings and recreational uses. In addition, please see the 1995 Demographic Study document for additional land holdings information. 5.9 Acquisitions: Groesbeck Golf Course: The land immediately north of Groesbeck Golf Course and Bancroft Park is currently owned by the Board of Water and Light. Acquisition of this land would allow for expansion of the golf course which would, in turn, enhance and improve the course. Crego Park: The land directly across the Red Cedar River from Crego Park is currently being used by the Board of Water and Light to store lime, which is slowly being reclaimed. This land is an important link between Crego Park and the River Trail. It may also serve for parking off of Aurelius Road and zoo expansion and storage. The acquisition of scattered land parcels fronting the west side of Fidelity Road and on the north side of Mount Hope Road are paramount to the future entry to Crego Park and should be purchased as they become available. Rimer TraiURiver Frontage: In keeping with past city master plans, the department will continue to acquire river front property to hold in public trust and develop for recreational purposes by fee simple or easement. This includes all river frontage within the city. In particular, lands located to the north and west of Dietrich Park such as the Board of Water and Light (BWL) property at the north end of Comfort Street across from Tecumseh Park, the Conrail property on the south side of the Grand River east of the BWL land, an easement along the Consumers Power property east of the Conrail land and easements or purchase of properties connecting to Dietrich park. Cooperation will be needed from General Motors to build the trail next to their plant to link Cooley Gardens and Elm Street. Other river front properties along Sycamore Creek should be acquired when made available to eventually connect the trail south to the Poyet property, Hope Soccer complex and finally to Holt. Small parcels or easements should be acquired whenever they become available along the Grand River, Red Cedar River and Sycamore Creek to link the River Trail throughout the city and to adjacent communities. Downtown Business District: Open space in or adjacent to the Central Business District should be acquired in order to allow for additional green space in the urban environment and provide space for public programming for Lansing civic organizations. These parcels can also be used as staging sites for the many special events and rallies that are attracted to the state's capital city. Wentworth Park can be linked with Louis F. Adado/Riverfront Park to the north in conjunction with the Ottawa Station Redevelopment Project. Acquisition of properties in this district supports the linkage of attractions and open space, as well as the continuous river walk on both sides of the river, and, if feasible, pedestrian/bicycle bridges. A feasibility study should be conducted to determine the best linkages. Turner/Dodge: In keeping with the Turner/Dodge master plan, acquisition of the parcels west of the 5.10 Turner/Dodge House should occur if and when these properties come on the market. Securing first right of refusal needs to be accomplished now in order to position the city for the future acquisitions. City- Wide: Acquisitions should be sought by the department which meet the following criteria a) make park lands more useable b) provide buffers or setbacks between different land uses c) allow property lines to align properly or "square off' irregular shaped parcels d) provide better or improved ingress and egress and linkages between park facilities and other city attractions e) have river frontage or provide better use or access to the river within Lansing f) land donations that meet specific purpose or serve specific park or recreation related needs. Non-contiguous park land donations should be large if they intend to stand alone. g) lands that are in the best interest of the citizens of Lansing Disposals: In keeping with the December 10, 1979 Land Policy, park, recreation, cemetery or waterfront land considered for disposal should undergo careful evaluation. Ultimately these lands, if proposed for sale, must be approved by a vote of the people. The June 22, 1981 Council Resolution classifying lands under the jurisdiction of the Parks and Recreation Department indicated that ten sites were not subject to the disposal provisions of the City Charter, unless they are waterfront but were subject to the December 12, 1979 policy action with regard to disposal of land unsuitable for park development. This action therefore made ten parcels available for sale. Since 1981, six of the parcels have been sold (Note, however, that 20 acres of Parcel C were retained since it is along the Sycamore Creek). The four (4) remaining sites are: Foster .Street Lots: This site is located at the end of Foster St. two blocks away from Foster Park. The contamination, which exists on most of the site, discourages any possible park development. Currently the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality is planning on doing environmental re -mediation by excavation and capping of the contaminated sections of the site. Highway Parcel B: This site is located on the south side of I-96 and at the east end of Dadson Dr. (Note: The site now has a cell tower place on it. The lease money from the cell tower is appropriated into the Park Land and Acquisition Development account. It is now in the Department's best interest to retain the site.) Mifflin Property: These vacant parcels located south of Kalamazoo Street at the south end of Mifflin Street have little recreational potential due to their size. As with the Foster Lots, this area of the city is served by Foster Park which is three blocks away. An individual has expressed interest in the purchase of these parcels for other uses. This property is in the floodplain and holds limited potential for single family development. 5.11 The Paulson Site: The Paulson site located in the northeast corner of the City at the east end of Paulson Street is an inactive landfill which has remained unused for many years. Being adjacent to the active Granger landfill, this vacant site may serve a better use by expanding the landfill site to the east. At the October 1994 Park Board meeting a number of parks were discussed for possible disposal. Four of eleven sites considered received a majority vote of the Park Board. These are: 1) Elmhurst Park (give to school), 2) Foster Park (sell south vacant lots and lots at end of street), 3) Highway Parcel B (discussed above) and 4) Munn Park land trade (Note that this went to a vote of the people and the land trade was approved and consummated.). The following sites did not receive a majority vote of the Park Board: Filley Park (sell west), Graves Park, McKinch (sell south portion), Quentin Park (sell lot 15), Reasoner Park (sell portion of), Regent Park and Willoughby Park Other possible sites for disposal are: Grand Woods Park: Grand Woods Park is currently leased to Delta Township and may at some point might be transferred to Delta Township or Eaton County so as to keep the land in public trust. Elmhurst Park: The Park Board recommended transferring this land back to the schools for their use. As with most of the school park sites, if one entity maintained it, great efficiency could be assured plus it relates more to school use than park functions. Other: Other park lands which do not serve city residents or do not provide potential recreation or conservation value should be investigated for disinvestment. Careful evaluation should be given to park lands which fall into this category. It is not the intention of the Lansing Parks and Recreation Department to serve as a regional parks and recreation provider by holding properties that do not serve Lansing residents directly. Lansing, however, is not opposed to providing regional partnerships which meet specific needs by leasing or granting compatible uses. Further evaluation should be conducted on any park land prior to disinvestment. Any park land disposal will require careful evaluation and a vote by the people, Mayor, City Council and Park Board prior to exchange, disposal or sale. Monies acquired from exchange, disposal or sale are to be used to further develop current land holdings or acquire valuable parcels of potential park land as established under the 1979 City Council Policy. ACCESS COMMITTEE In the past, the department has had an ADA Transition Plan as a separate document from the Five Year Master Plan. At the suggestion of the MDNR, the Five Year Master Plan and the ADA Transition Plan have been combined. It was found that the two separate plans overlapped each other to a great extent. Please see Section 4. 5.12 In the upcoming five years, the department should concentrate on providing increased signage, accurate maps and topographical relief maps for parks with trails and features. The department should also concentrate on providing videos, cassettes and CD audio services for special events. Programs: There were a number of needs addressed by the Access Focus Group in the area of programming for access and inclusion. • provide the disabled an opportunity to explore a class for inclusion one time before registration and payment. • provide open drop -in programs at a community center, such as the senior program, which would increase services for daily programs, Leisure Education and those people not able to access CMH services. • explore the possibility of partnering with the MAC for aquatic therapy programs to treat out -patients who no longer have insurance coverage in treatment. • review the practices that limit access to general recreation programs (i.e. transportation to summer programs, Halloween haunted sites are not accessible in design). • review and update policies and procedures to reflect current practices in the field of legislation and litigation. • identify the willingness to comply with the ADA by establishing and maintaining a budget for making reasonable accommodations (i.e. supply of an interpreter, additional staff and staff training). • provide open aquatic time for walkers and stretchers (vs. lap swim). • provide space within facilities for additional daytime programs for people who are not eligible for services through Community Mental Health. • increase Leisure Education programs by offering them more than one time per week. • increase programs or special events in the school district during school time for the disabled. • establish a travel program with sponsorship to reduce costs. • establish additional classes in art, dance and music. • increase programs offered throughout the year for all age groups. • provide mentors for inclusion and buddy systems. The Access committee also addressed specific needs at the following facilities: .Scott Woods Park: Work with the MDNR/DEQ to change the access on the bridges for people to use the trail system. Provide a hard surface trail which would support disable populations in this area. This could be accomplished through the extension of the River Trail to Hawk Island Park. This improved trail would increase programs and access for patients in rehabilitation and for people who use the Respite Home for services. Grade the area, increase play structures, provide better lighting to reduce teen hangout and drug distribution. Establish fishing areas with landings. All development in this park should strongly consider all of the sensitive natural features and ecosystems it provides. 5.13 Potter Park and Zoo: Establish an area for raised beds for gardening by the disabled. Throughout the zoo, different groups or organizations have sponsored garden flower beds. Raised beds allow for a group in the community who is disabled to participate in this service and could possibly include a children's garden or component for a good intergenerational mix. Fenner Nature Center: Provide accurate signage for the trails with guide areas, trail patterns, audio or visual presentation - options. At the trail head provide a topographical relief map. Publish this information for all events. Turner -Dodge House: Provide audio and video presentations for programs and special events. Publish this information for all events. ADOPT -A -PARK PROGRAM The Adopt -A -Park Program was officially established in 1999 to promote beautification of the park system. Residents are encouraged to volunteer to maintain certain aspects of park. maintenance such as playground surfacing upkeep, trash pick up, plantings, and pet waste cleanup utilizing Mutt Mitts. The city should continue support of this valuable program as the costs for maintaining and improving our park system continue to increase. The city should expand on this program by providing training for people involved in the program. Funding sources for this program should be established and maintained to provide supplies, tools, water, and other needed items for the continued success of this program. AQUATICS The department operates two outdoor pool facilities at Moores and Hunter Parks. Moores Pool has undergone some improvements over the years, however, much more is needed to provide a quality facility. Moores Park Pool could also use more attractions such as a water slide. Both Moores and Hunter should be improved with plantings and pathways, benches and bike racks to create more attractive entrances. Hunter Pool should be evaluated as to renovation or new construction of a more modern swimming recreational experience. Possible modifications to Hunter could include the addition of a water slide, a spray pool and water play area of zero depth which gradually deepens allowing an area for small children to play, parents to sit next to children in the water and increased usage for persons with disabilities and expanded deck areas around the pool which would allow areas for sun-bathing and parents to sit and watch their children swimming. Examples of such pool rejuvenation programs exist in several mid -western cities. The concept of water playgrounds is popular and should be evaluated. Areas should be identified which are not in close proximity to the two pools, Hunter and Moores. The south side of Lansing should be considered first as it .is lacking in this area. These water playgrounds could incorporate such features as -zero depth areas with sprayers, cascading water, and colorful water toys, with 5.14 ample seating for the parents. Maintenance issues were of high concern at both pools centering around preventative and safety issues. These include such items as replacing the chlorination systems, repainting water depth markings, upgrading the plumbing, chipped paint in the locker rooms and water quality. The pools also need to be made more "parent friendly" with seating installed on the decks, out of the way of the lifeguards. This seating should be provided in shaded areas, with permanent structures, so as not to contaminate the water quality with leaves and other debris from trees. The pools are open eleven weeks each summer and offer recreational programming in the form of open swims, adult swims, swims for the disabled and swimming lessons. Programming is under the direction of a full time staff member supported by summer seasonal pool staff. The pools offer swimming during summer months to many people who do not have access to other swimming opportunities. The department should continue to foster swimming programs to "grow" lifeguarding staff. Future programs should be directed toward maintaining or expanding the number of users while still providing a safe, accessible and functional water experience. Swimming programs should be expanded to include special interest classes and special events such as canoeing, boating, scuba and swimming exhibitions. ATHLETIC FACILITIES (PARK/SCHOOLJ The department has many ball fields ranging from quality tournament play for softball at Ranney and baseball at Kircher to intramural and other league play at Westside, Comstock, Davis, Elm, Gier, Marshall, Quentin, St. Joseph, Sycamore, Kendon, and Washington Parks. Many neighborhood parks contain recreation fields for drop in play. The department will continue to promote, improve and expand these and other traditional active recreation facilities as demand increases. Interest has been expressed by Everett High School's baseball coach to light a baseball field. A study should be conducted to determine if and where it should occur. If the demand is proven then the department will work with the Lansing School Board to provide a joint facility. Kircher Field: Kircher Park has the Parks and Recreation Department's only lighted field for baseball. The facility has no restroom facility for the participants. A combined restroom/concession/ maintenance facility would enhance Kircher as one of the premier baseball facilities in the area. The lighted scoreboard should also be evaluated for renovation, as it is showing its age. Ranney Park: . There is currently a master plan underway for the renovation of Ranney Park. Ranney has seen limited use since the decline of fastpitch softball. The entire park is being addressed in the master plan to enhance this park. New improvements would include renovation of the ball diamond, the installation of a new playground and shelter, pathway on the north end, enhancements of the area on the north end of the park as a natural area, construction of in -line skating area, skateboard 5.15 park and tennis courts. Davis Park: Davis Park consists of two ball diamond areas. The diamonds on the east end of the park are used for league softball and the diamonds on the west end are used for youth leagues. The youth leagues were renovated with field improvements and new backstops. Future improvements to the softball fields should include replacement of the existing lighting systems and lighting the third diamond and the addition of scorer's sheds. The park improvements should also include the construction of a newly combined restroom/concession/maintenance building, irrigation of the diamonds, new scoreboards and parking lot improvements. ATHLETIC PROGRAMS Currently the department plans and programs nine different sports in over 175 leagues for adults and youth. Leagues are very diversified and geared to all levels of competition; starting with T- Ball (instructional) up to those teams that want to vie for national championships. Leagues are offered for men, women, co-ed and/or youth in the following activities: basketball, softball, volleyball, soccer, tennis, baseball, floor hockey and flag football. Future trends 'in competitive and instructional sports will be in co-ed activities and soccer. For the last five years, women's softball and adult basketball leagues have declined steadily while co-ed has increased five -fold. Soccer will continue to expand, not only youth but adult as well. With 45-50 youth teams per season, the current facilities are used to capacity. Frances Park is currently used for soccer, but facilities have had drainage problems. If drainage problems can be overcome with proper base and drain tiles, Frances could provide two or possibly three soccer fields in the future. Other cities have already started adult leagues. Lansing has a women's league of nine teams (not through Parks and Recreation), but as of yet, no men's leagues because of lack of interest. The department should continue to evaluate and"explore a possible partnership with the Mid -Michigan Football Youth League. The MMFYL has had 12 to 15 teams with approximately 800 children participating. Other sites should be evaluated for their potential for providing facilities for competitive and instructional field sports. Currently, the department uses many of the Lansing School District facilities for its sports programs. With an aging school system, just like the parks system, many of these facilities are in disrepair. Program success is being judged by the facility where it takes place. The department and the school district should work jointly to address this problem of aging facilities. Also, tennis programs and facilities have been declining; tennis programs should be reinstated and facilities upgraded to bring back this sport to our youth populations. The department needs to evaluate and develop a program to assure that the athletic facilities are left in a cleaner condition when the program is finished than it was when they arrived for the program. This program can become part of the coach's responsibilities. This will be discussed with coaches at their organizational meetings and•a plan formulated. 5.16 BASKETBALL FACILITIES Outdoor basketball facilities are needed throughout the city. Many parks provide basketball and the department plans to continue this practice. In addition, an outdoor basketball complex is proposed at Benjamin Davis Park in the southwest part of the city. Due to the community interest in basketball in this section of the city, a six -court complex is recommended --renovation of one existing court and five new courts all within the same area. The courts are proposed to be lighted and provide basketball as a concentrated activity. Other sites throughout the city should be evaluated for their potential to upgrade their basketball facilities. If the Benjamin Davis lighted facility is successful, there may be interest in additional night basketball facilities at regional or community parks, which would help eliminate problems associated with night basketball in neighborhood parks. CEMETERIES (LANSING MUNICIPAL) The department will continue to maintain Mt. Hope, Evergreen and North Cemeteries. Few burials take place in Mt. Hope and North as they are older cemeteries with few available lots for sale. The cemetery infrastructure requires evaluation in terms of fencing, waterlines and continued road maintenance. Expansion of Evergreen Cemetery may be necessary within the next five years to provide additional burial sites through the division of outside lots and development of new section(s). A cemetery feasibility plan was completed in July of 1994, by L.F. Sloane Consulting Group. The recommendations in the plan suggest selling the cemeteries to a private company. The department has evaluated this option and has chosen not to pursue this, however, outside management of the cemeteries is being evaluated. COMMUNITY CENTERS The department currently staffs Foster Community Center, Gier Community Center and Letts Community Center. The centers are geographically distributed throughout the north, east and west areas of the city, north of I-496. The locations of these centers is shown on the map in Section 4, page 4.12. Programming at the centers is structured toward all ages, from pre- schoolers to seniors, and is offered both on a drop -in or scheduled basis. Fees for the programs range from no cost to nominal fees. Community groups and neighborhood organizations also use the centers for meeting purposes. Miller Road Community Center, the only center south of I-96, serves people over fifty years of age in the senior program. Miller Road is also a site for some of our enrichment classes. A strong need has been identified for a community center on the south side of the city. Further clarification of its location, size and configuration is still required. Foster Community Center: Foster Community Center, is a renovated elementary school on the east side. The center also houses the Leisure and Special Recreation Services, Lifetime Sports and Leisure Services administrative offices. The Capital Area District Library administers and staffs a branch public 5.17 library from this center. The library offers book and video lending as well as children's story -time hours. The center also includes several classrooms, a gym, game room and an outside children's play area. There has recently been extensive renovation on most areas of the building. These renovations are expected to keep this 1917 structure operational for another twenty years. There is still a need to renovate the kitchen facilities and provide protective covering for the remaining radiators still used in the heating system. Gier Community Center: Located in the northern portion of the city within 36.5 acres of park land is Gier Community Center. The center is immediately adjacent to Otto Middle and Gier Elementary schools. Gier Park serves as an extended school yard, neighborhood park and a site for softball league play with three lighted fields and a junior baseball field. In addition to regular programming, Gier Center sponsors several special events throughout the year. Recent renovations to this building included refurbishing the gym and expanding game room facilities. Site improvements should include a pavilion near the ball park and more playground equipment near the pavilion. A BMX track run by a local chapter of the National Bicycle League is currently under consideration in the park. Finally, the focus group indicated a desire for a soccer field with bleachers with improved and increased parking for the park. Letts Community Center: The center is located within a downtown residential area on the west side. The regular programming at Letts includes a very active senior program. Many of the groups that met in the Senior Center at the former Civic Center have successfully relocated their meetings to Letts Center. Recent renovations to this building included renovations to the gym and roof repairs. Future improvements should include the upgrade of the electrical capacity of the library. This would allow staff to explore the opportunity to offer computer usage to the youth as a recreational pastime, as well as an enhancement to their educational pursuits. Park improvements which are part of the community center complex would include complete replacement and renovation of the four tennis courts which are slowly deteriorating due to age. The tennis courts are used for instruction and are also used for play and practice by the local high school. An improved music room would be advantageous. Miller Road Community Center: Miller Road Community Center is located in the south end of the city just west of Cedar Street. This center provides hot lunch and senior citizen programs during the day and in the evening, and is also a site for a few of our enrichment classes. The existing building is relatively old and outdated. The department continues to have many maintenance problems with the structure. The center needs basic electrical and mechanical improvements, particularly heating and air temperature control. The seniors are more comfortable at warmer temperatures, whereas the aerobic exercisers request a cooler environment. The interior of the building needs to be painted 5.18 and windows need to be lowered to allow for visual patrol of the parking lot which will provide security to users. Outdoor improvements should include the renovation and expansion of the parking lot which has no ADA access and is currently below its capacity for current uses. The upgrade of this facility will not preclude the need for a south side community center. Future Community Center Improvements: Future needs, which have been identified for the community centers in general, include the increased need in youth programming for the ages of 12-22, the children of working parents,- and at risk youth. A need has been identified to provide supervised after -school programming at the community centers or the neighborhood schools in order to provide creative avenues where city's youth can exert their energies and develop creative, positive thought processes. Programming needs to focus on recreational leisure time activities as an alternative to idle, destructive free time. Possibilities include increased hours of operation and/or later evening hours, weekend programs, increased structured programming and special events and redesigning new ways of offering and delivering services. Seniors have expressed regrets over losing the previous senior citizen programmer position. With the current staffing, there is not a position to specifically focus on the needs and recreational services for the seniors on a city wide basis. The need for a community center(s) located in the southern region of the city continues to be discussed by the City Council. A survey, committee recommendations and previous public hearings all expressed a need for an additional community center(s) in the south end as well as additional indoor recreational opportunities, such as swimming, tennis, a track and fitness and nautilus equipment. Decisions must be made as to location and whether a centralized center or multiple satellite centers would be in the best interest of the community, before funding can be pursued. In addition, funding to cover operations and maintenance will have to be agreed upon between the administration and the City Council. In order to better serve the community, an evaluation as to the possible usage of the neighborhood schools for potential recreation centers should also be pursued. Responses from the committees and citizen comments have supported the need and desire of additional neighborhood recreational programs and centers, particularly for the south side, and the veteran, seniors and youth populations. Due to increased demands on the centers, a mechanism for funding needs to be addressed. Once services are provided there needs to be a method for sustaining the buildings, programs and activities. This funding source should be identified during the planning process before additional centers are developed. .Senior Centers: The department provides senior programming at each of its community centers and operates and staffs the Miller Road Community Center. Programming of these centers is based on the interests and needs of people fifty years of age or older and addresses activities, social events, health 5.19 concerns and information sought out by this age group. As the "baby -boomers" mature and "early retirement" continues there will be a substantial increase in the number of people over the age of fifty that have available leisure time. This will continue to affect the Parks and Recreation Department through an increased need for active programming for this segment of the population. A Senior Citizen Programmer position has been identified by seniors as a major need. This position needs to be filled and a funding mechanism established to sustain the position. CREGO PARK A new master plan should be developed for Crego Park. This new master plan should combine the concepts in previous completed plans. This facility could provide year round recreational opportunities for the city's residents. The park has potential to be revenue producing which could help offset the operational cost. The site was contaminated by improper chemical waste disposal practices during the 1960-70's. During the 1980's, the site was cleaned up at a cost of 8 million dollars. The master planning and development efforts should include cooperation with Ingham County Parks and Recreation, as it is proposed that the operation of this park would be a cooperative effort between the two agencies. Past master plans have included plans for a major "Water Fun Park". The revised master plan should reduce this concept to a more passive, day use, water based park to include a shelter(s), trails, fishing (catch and release), boating, picnicking and family related activities. A connection to the existing River Trail from Potter Park/Zoo area and onto Fenner Nature Center is also a prime consideration. More active recreation might include cross country skiing, in -line skating, ice skating, mountain biking, volleyball, basketball and other more traditional park activities. Acquisition of properties along Mt. Hope and Fidelity Roads are necessary to create an adequate entry into the park off of Mt. Hope. Fidelity Road is currently the only access into the park. Acquiring the property along Fidelity would provide direct access into the park without disturbing residents. CULTURAL ARTS AND HISTORICAL Turner -Dodge House: The Turner/Dodge House is a nationally registered historic house. The house has been renovated on the exterior with some interior improvements. The House is staffed by a Curator. Historic education through interpretive classes, tours and day camps as well as cultural programs such as historic crafts, dance and piano are emphasized. The house also is the focus of special events such as the Victorian Christmas and special exhibits reflecting history and/or the arts. Over 25,000 persons enjoy the house through these programs annually. The committee should evaluate and implement a junior docent program. The Turner/Dodge master plan completed in 1993 calls for site renovation, exterior building restorations and interior restoration. Many of the exterior restoration items were completed in 5.20 1995 and 1996. Restoration remaining includes interior work involving the restoration of various rooms and related structural, mechanical, electrical and HVAC improvements. In addition, site improvements still need to be implemented. The Friends of Turner/Dodge are currently working on raising funds to construct a carriage house to shelter a carriage recently acquired by them. A visitors center is also planned for. This center would be the gathering place for tour groups and would allow for historical displays to be set up. .The parks department continues to seek outside funding for the future improvements from foundations and other private sources. DOG PARKS A new program becoming popular throughout the country is the creation of "dog parks". A dog park is a place where people and their unleashed dogs can play together. They provide safe, accessible places where dog owners can meet other people and exercise their pets. These parks also promote responsible pet ownership and a realistic enforcement to dog control laws. The department should evaluate the possibility of the creation of a dog park in the city. Crego Park and Grand River Park are viable locations for dog parks. DOWNTOWN PARKS The Downtown Focus Group concentrated on park areas in the Central Business District that included Louis F. Adado Riverfront Park and Trail System, Burchard, Cherry Hill, Cooley Gardens, Durant, Ferris, Larch, Oak, Reutter, Riverpoint, Scott Art and Garden Center, Turner Mini, Turner -Dodge House and Wentworth. A great concern of the focus group was the maintenance at all parks in the downtown area. With the department's aging park system, they felt that the parks should be restored to their original beauty. All locations lack in appropriate numbers of benches, trash receptacles and other such amenities. To increase the level of maintenance, the department should pursue and encourage partnerships and collaborations between the city departments, private enterprise and the community. To restore the parks to their original beauty, master plans should be developed for each park. A particular area of focus in the development of the master plans should be connections and linkages within the downtown to allow for easier access to all parks. These linkages could be accomplished by walkways, the River Trail, bike lanes, river boats, the trolley system and signage. Businesses should be encouraged to open their shops and restaurants to the river and park side to promote interaction between the park users and business owners. In addition to'the development efforts, many programs have been offered and it will be important to continue to demonstrate the sustained interest in Lansing's downtown by continuing and improving many of the programs offered to the public. There are a number of special events that take place in the downtown area. The department should continue to encourage quality events and the cooperation between agencies, organizations, 5.21 other departments, foundations, or other community groups to enhance or sponsor these special events. LEPFA is in the process of planning a new week long Music Festival, proposed to be staged at Adado Riverfront Park downtown. For this event to occur, this park will need major improvements to support this and other quality events. EBERSOLE ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION AND CONFERENCE CENTER The Ebersole Environmental Education and Conference Center in Wayland, Michigan has been a major contribution of recreation and environment education opportunities through camps retreats and meetings for students and adults. In 1996-97, the center had attendance from within the City of Lansing contributing to 50% of students and adults, with another 15% from the Greater Lansing area. Their inclusion in this plan should give them an opportunity to seek out additional funding through state grant resources to acquire natural areas bordering the property, including rare fen wetlands, develop interpretive access to these areas, and further develop Ebersole's infrastructure to better meet the recreation and environmental education needs of their visitors. FORESTRY (STREET AND PARK) The City of Lansing has been named an "All American Tree City" by the National Arbor Society for ten years consecutively. The Forestry Section is responsible for all street trees located between the curb and sidewalk as well as trees on all public and park lands. This adds up to an estimated 120,000 trees cared for by the division. Forestry currently maintains nurseries, tree installation, tree maintenance, tree hazard reduction, emergency response and tree removal. The future will focus on participation in Global Relief and tree maintenance to prolong tree life. Forestry provides a major impact in the quality of life and city beautification as "Trees are the City." Goals of the Forestry Program include updating the tree inventory and integrating it with a GIS system, plantings to improve street and park landscapes, promoting community education programs to increase public awareness of trees, reducing tree pruning cycles to a level consistent with arboriculture standards, and establishing of a Citizens Forestry Advisory Board to examine issues related to the forestry program and as a forum for citizen input. FRANCES PARK Frances Park is located on the Grand River along Moores River Drive just east of Waverly Road. The park facility currently includes a formal rose garden, recognized as an All -American Rose Garden by the American Rose Society, an overlook over the Grand River, a pavilion with restrooms, large picnic areas, play equipment, a natural woodland trail and a large open sports field which can accommodate multi -uses. The park is currently used extensively for weddings in the garden and overlook and large group picnics. The future goals for the park are to maintain the garden's current standards, provide replacement of plant materials where required due to age, encourage the continued planting of the recently started Memorial Tree Grove along the park drive, and continued overall quality maintenance including drainage for the athletic field. 5.22 GOLF OPERATIONS (LANSING MUNICIPAL) The department owns and operates four golf courses: Groesbeck with 18 holes and Red Cedar, Sycamore and Waverly with 9 holes each. The courses range in difficulty, care and cost of play. It is the department's goal to offer quality, affordable golf at variable levels of difficulty. Currently, Groesbeck offers a challenge to the proficient golfer, Waverly has the potential to offer a challenge but lacks the amenities the serious golfer desires (i.e., watered fairways), the others are for the intermediate and novice golfer. Programming for the courses include open rounds, reserved rounds, golf leagues and special tournaments. In conjunction with the Ingham County Drain Commission, 9 holes were remodeled at Groesbeck to accommodate rain water detention as part of the sewer separation project east of the course. The "state of the art" 9 holes provides multiple tee locations to accommodate golfers of every skill level. The overall project has received numerous awards and national attention as an excellent example of urban land use that benefits the entire community. Remodeling of the other 9 holes should be considered within the next 5 year period in order to maintain market share and remain competitive in an increasingly competitive market. Master plans for redevelopment were prepared for Waverly and Groesbeck Golf Courses in 1989 which include expanding Waverly to 18 holes with construction of a new clubhouse facility. The project at Groesbeck completed in 1998 incorporates many of the master plan ideas. Some expansion into the south portion of Bancroft Park may be feasible while at the same time improving upon the parks amenities. However, protecting the Mason Esker in the park along with the wood lot in the northern part of the park is important. To this date no aspect of the master plan for Waverly has been started. A Land Use Study should be undertaken regarding the flooding and frequent closure of Sycamore Golf Course. All golf courses should have a Land Use Plan to ensure highest and best use of the courses owned by the City of Lansing. Facility improvements must be made to ensure future financial success as well as protect and preserve these assets owned by the City. Irrigation deficiencies exist at all of the 9-hole courses. Only by making strong improvements will the 9 hole courses return to being an influential part of the golfing community in this area. A new Learning Center and Driving Range, currently lacking within the system, would produce revenue while encouraging future participants. In a recreational activity that continues to increase in cost, every effort must be made to introduce the game to new players and keep pricing at a level that does not deter people from the game. This needs to be done in a way that also maximizes the financial security of the golf enterprise fund. The golf fund should be considered in future millage proposals due to the fiends contribution to the general fund through the indirect cost program. An evaluation of the equity funding program as it applies to all department special funds should be done to ensure that these funds are viable in the fixture. Efforts should be made to promote community awareness of the benefits of the City of Lansing continuing to operate these golf facilities. Additionally, a scholarship program, tournament schedule and brochures should be developed. 5.23 GRAND RIVER PARK Grand River Park is located on the north shore of the Grand River along the western city boundary. The property was acquired from R.E. Olds in 1944. This park, along with Frances Park on the opposite side of the river, is a great asset to the parks system. These two parks provide a vast amount of water frontage along the Grand River and green space at the terminus of the city limits. These natural features should be maintained for the integrity of public purposes. The park is a prime location for boating and docking facilities. In 1998, the State of Michigan through the Department of Natural Resources, the Board of Water and Light, and the city combined financial resources to renovate this park. These improvements included new restrooms, launch facilities and a paved parking lot for cars and boat trailers, with handicap accessibility throughout. This park houses a number of outside groups such as the MSU Ski Team, the MSU Rowing Team, the Lansing Oar and Paddle Club, J & K Steamboat, the Lansing Boat Club, and the boating public of Lansing. Currently, all groups work cooperatively with each other at the park. The Lansing Boat Club has maintained a lease on this property since it was given to the city by R.E. Olds in 1944. The club, a Michigan non-profit corporation and licensed marina, should be allowed to remain at this site provided they open and encourage the membership of more people, and they meet safety standards with their facilities, particularly the docks along the river bank. Currently, the docks present unsafe conditions, and the area is not accessible to the disabled. A master plan for the park has been in process. Although the plan is not complete, early goals and objectives reinforce the need for continuing to provide public boating and related activities along the shoreline of the Grand River. Unsolicited proposals have been provided by local housing developers for the west l 5± acres of the park, which have laid idle since the origin of the park. Developers plans propose up -scale housing, while leaving a minimum of 100 feet of shoreline in public ownership. Different concepts are being explored to create the best combination of public and/or private uses within the park along with funding options. The results are unknown at this time, however, a partnership between the public and private sectors may produce a unique plan that preserves the natural assets of the existing shoreline, fives the city additional residential tax base and affords the public new renovated public boat slips and docks for seasonal use. A public vote would be required before the housing proposal could be seriously considered. Until then, the city must confront the current docking standards, funding and management issues associated with the operation. There has been some interest to seek permission to sell 15f acres along Lansing Road for housing as long as it did not interfere with park use along the river. 5.24 NATURAL AREAS Fenner Nature Center: Fenner Nature Center is the base resource for the department's natural areas and environmental education consisting of a series of natural ecosystems and a visitor's center staffed by the department's Naturalist. Fenner offers both structured and unstructured nature orientated recreation with a commitment to the continued effort to educate residents of all ages about the environment. Programming specifically includes scheduled programs for over 7,000 school children a year, summer nature day camps, adult programs and special events such as Apple Butter in the fall and the Maple Syrup in the spring. Fenner is also open daily for self guided nature walks. Fenner would like to develop a relationship with the Lansing School District and neighborhood groups to utilize the park/school sites as educational extensions and neighborhood recreation areas. A master plan for Fenner Nature Center was completed in 1994. Renovation to the Nature Center building occurred in 1994. Additional renovations, proposed in the master plan include trails, stream construction, landscape planting, outdoor'displays and exhibits. The master plan emphasized the need to reinforce a natural "Michigan environment." Exhibits which do not conform to this theme will be gradually phased out. Specific improvements include developing a boardwalk and enhancing the plant life on the Marsh Trail, upgrading the youth group camp area, and also acquiring additional nature center staff, fencing and plantings. Refer to the Fenner Nature Center Master Plan for more detail. In 1999, the 10 acre parcel along Mt. Hope was purchased. This purchase will provides the department with significant ownership of park land along Mt. Hope and Aurelius Roads which allows the department to create a natural appearance that is homogenous with the natural parks in this area. It is planned to build a road into the group camp area at Fenner through this property. This allows direct access to this area without going through Evergreen Cemetery. Other Natural Areas: The department holds many properties which are undeveloped, or naturalized. Some of these parks include Bancroft, Beck, Crego, Davis, Fine, Fulton, Grand River, Holly, Kimberly, Poxson, Regent, Scott Woods, Shubel and Tecumseh. These areas should be kept natural as to encourage habitats by providing green space and natural buffer zones to the urban environment. A policy should be developed to deal with the naturalization and de -naturalization of park lands. This policy might include items of concern with the naturalization and denaturalization of park land such as increased/decreased maintenance levels, the fears of crime/vandalism with naturalized areas, and the increased/decreased level of habitats in the natural environment. NEIGHBORHOOD AND CITY WIDE PARKS Current park land holdings offer a very diverse group of park experiences. Each park is uniquely suited to different activities based on terrain, natural vegetation, size, context and current facilities available. Considerable renovation to this vital infrastructure is required in the form of play 5.25 equipment, play fields, roads, utilities, tennis courts and landscaping. Considerable funding will be required to return these parks to their original planned service level and beauty. Current departmental goals for the neighborhood parks include the ability to provide regular routine maintenance, new playgrounds in many parks that service a young population, recreation sport facilities for casual users, picnicking facilities, trails and open space for social gatherings and - preservation of natural features. A major effort to develop playgrounds, within the parks and on school properties, was initiated in .1994 known as "Project Play". The Parks and Recreation Department and city provided time and money in cooperation with Lansing School District, neighborhood grants, PTO fund raising projects, private donations, Community -Development Block Grants and state grants, to place play structures on both park and school sites through 1997. Where a park has a school adjoining the site the equipment was placed either on the school site or close to it. By the year 2000, sixty- eight sites will have had playground equipment installed that meets current industry standards. Another twenty-one park sites are still on the replacement schedule pending funding considerations. The department has a Landscape Architect trained and certified as a playground inspector. As playground equipment is inspected in the city parks, it is evaluated against the current industry standards. Equipment not in compliance is targeted for removal. Additional funding will be sought for the remaining twenty-one sites including park millage, private donations, volunteer efforts, Community Development Block Grants, state grants and local grants. Currently six park sites (Comstock, Foster, Oak, St. Joe, Sycamore and Westside) have buildings that were once used as picnic pavilions and/or drop in centers. Due to budget constraints in years passed, city staffing for these facilities was eliminated and uses were restricted to reduce utility and building maintenance costs. Some of the buildings were also used as warming houses for the natural ice rink program which is no longer offered. With neighborhood organizations becoming more active, requests are being received to reopen these facilities by turning them over to the neighborhood organization. City policy decisions will have to be made regarding who will be responsible for utilities, liability insurance, bringing the building up to code and building maintenance. OAK PARK MAINTENANCE COMPLEX The Oak Park Complex currently houses the service garages for most department vehicles and equipment, offices for Forestry and Grounds and Landscape Maintenance Sections and material storage, as well as a work base for the majority of the persons employed in these sections. The building is in immediate need of improvements to the restrooms. This facility is currently in need of replacement due to the deteriorated condition of the buildings, inefficient work conditions and the need for increased worker safety. Some of the existing structures date back to 1948. The buildings were added onto several times through the 1960's to provide more space for the then growing department. The buildings do not comply with current codes or accessibility standards. The department recommends a new facility be located and built to serve the garage and field maintenance operations. 5.26 A study needs to be conducted to locate a new site or to demolish the existing building and rebuild. Land to the immediate west, between Oak Park and the railroad tracks fronting Shiawassee Street, is hoped to be purchased. This property, depending upon contamination issues, would be important to acquire for improved access onto Shiawassee, parking and storage, if the Oak Park Field Office Complex is to remain in its present location. If this is not available, the possibility of buying properties on the east to Dorrance should be considered to expand the complex. If decisions are slow to materialize, improvements to existing restrooms should be made to meet code. PARK MILLAGE The Parks and Recreation Department relies heavily on a one mill five year park millage. Although one mill for five years was approved by the voters in 1990 and again in 1995 at an advisory referendum and has been levied by the City Council since, the general fund allocation to the Parks and Recreation Department is maintained at the approximately the same level as in 1990. In the 1990 budget, there were no capital improvement projects, however, there are close to 1.8 million in the 2000 budget. The revenue stream prior to the millage was not enough to adequately support the system with a capital improvement program. As the election draws nearer, one of the challenges faced by the department is the continuance of the millage. If authorized to appear on the August 2000 ballot, the Park Millage renewal question will compete with the Capital District Area Library millage. The future of the Lansing Parks system is highly dependent upon a third millage approval by the voters currently proposed for August of 2000. The department and administration must rely significantly on another one mill five year millage to continue at the present level of service. If the proposed 2000 millage fails, the availability of funds for matching grants will become very difficult to ascertain and the proposed schedule for capital improvements will not be realized. However, with passage of the millage, the department will make substantial progress in maintaining the existing park system and move toward renovation and development of many of the proposed facilities. The five year millage produces approximately 1.8 million dollars per year. Because of the millage, approximately 55% additional funds have been raised through matching federal grants, state grants and private donations. This match figure may actually rise if additional grants become available within the current five year millage period. It is apparent that the 1990 and 1995 millages were a great step toward the stabilization of the park system. It is also becoming increasingly apparent that an additional five year millage will be required to continue the success of this effort. PARK SECURITY The Parks and Recreation Department utilizes the Lansing Police Department (LPD) and private security to control most populated events. The Lansing Police Department works closely with the Parks and Recreation Department to insure a safe and enjoyable experience for visitors to the parks and recreational facilities. The LPD provides routine security coverage and response calls 5.27 for police service in the parks and, in cooperation with private security police, also provides crowd control during special events. POTTER PARK AND ZOO Potter Park and Zoo, the most heavily visited facility in the park system, has a yearly average attendance of over 300,000. The 98.5 acres of park land contains a portion of the River Trail, - three picnic pavilions, open picnic areas, a concession, playground equipment, a canoe rental area and the Potter Park Zoo. Potter Park Zoo, a nationally accredited zoo by the American Zoo and Aquarium Association (AZA), contains over 400 exotic animals. The park and zoo, both started in 1915, have been undergoing several renovation projects over the last ten years. Continued renovation and expansion is required to provide for the expanded user groups and to meet the current United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) standards for animal handling required for the needed animal permits. A list of proposed expenditures appears in the Capital Improvements Schedule. The zoo also derives support from the Potter Park Zoological Society. The society employs a full-time executive director, education coordinator, visitor services manager and an executive secretary. These society employees provide'support to the overall education preservation, conservation and recreation goals of the zoo, fund raising and membership drives to support the growth and renovation of the zoo. The society also provides volunteer support for special events, educational programs for school groups and an extensive summer Zoo School. The society is currently undertaking a major capital fund-raising campaign in order to further support zoo improvements. Specific improvements shall be forth coming at the conclusion of the master plan now in process. Please refer to this future zoo master plan document for priority projects. At this time, we anticipate a new entry and signature exhibit and a new Administration and Education Center. The Zoo Society and the Strategic Planning Committee are investigating the possibility of regionalizing Potter Park Zoo. As the zoo expands, it becomes more expensive to maintain. The concept of regionalization will invite all jurisdictions that benefit from the zoo to contribute and have participation in its growth and development. The funding proposed will.be assessed by a millage pro rated throughout the tri-county area. The proposal will require more investigation and research, as well as legislation, to proceed beyond this conceptual stage. PRIVATIZATION Opportunities must be studied in order to determine where private individuals and firms can offer the public better quality and reasonably priced recreational services than a city agency. Privatization will provide additional recreational opportunities for the Lansing community which are regulated by the department while allowing the department to focus on programs and facilities in which it can provide better than the private sector. Examples of privatization already exist with the operation of park concessions by advisory groups. Other potentials include boat rentals, 5.28 special events, sports rentals, vendors and concessionaires at other park locations. These ventures should be encouraged when they represent cost savings, unusual services or serve in the public's best interest. REVENUE PRODUCING FACILITIES In order for the department to continue to offer quality up-to-date programming it is becoming increasingly necessary to look toward privatization as well as revenue producing facilities and activities in order to continue to be able to maintain current facilities and programming. Trends toward revenue producing activities have been increasing within the recreation industry. In order for public entities to continue to maintain or expand, additional funding must be acquired to staff and program the facilities. The city has experienced a reduction in federal and state funding support during the same period in time that new mandated programs must be implemented. This coupled with increased cost associated with operations has resulted in reduced services in many general fund programs throughout the city. Continually the department is being forced to reduce programming, not program, or provide inadequate maintenance. Revenue producing facilities will allow some facilities to be self-supporting and reduce demand on the General Fund. RIVER TRAIL Currently the eight -mile River Trail extends from Dietrich Park, in the north end of Lansing, to East Lansing and Michigan State University. The trail provides linear recreation and transportation opportunities along the Grand and Red Cedar Rivers for bicyclists, rollerbladers, joggers and walkers. The trail interconnects a series of facilities such as Louis F. Adado/ Riverfront Park, City Market, the Downtown Central Business District, the State Capitol, Impression 5 Science Museum, R.E. Olds Science Museum, the Planet Walk, the Lansing Center, Turner -Dodge House, Brenke Fish Ladder, Moores Park and outdoor swimming pool, Michigan State University and Potter Park Zoo. The department should continue efforts to acquire and secure easements to allow for future expansion of the River Trail. Future linkages of the trail include completion of several legs of the trail system: 1) from Potter Park Zoo to Crego Park and Fenner Nature Center, 2) from Potter Park Zoo to the new Ingham County, Hawk Island Park located at Cavanaugh and Aurelius Roads, 3) from Hawk Island Park south to the Poyet parcel being purchased by the City, 4) from the Poyet parcel to the Ingham County Hope Soccer Complex, 5) from the Hope Soccer Complex south to Holt (Delhi Township), 6) from the Ottawa Station Redevelopment Project to Wentworth Park at Michigan Avenue and Louis F. Adado/Riverfront Park to the north, 7) from Michigan Avenue to Cherry Hill Park, 8) from Moores Park to Grand River Park, 9) from Dietrich Park along the Grand River to Tecumseh Park (through the ConRail 5.29 easement, BWL property to the property on the opposite side of the river from Tecumseh Park where it would cross into the park), 10) from Tecumseh Park to Grand Woods Park in Delta Township, and 11) from the bridge north of Elm St. to Cooley Gardens and Scott Center. The old Ottawa Street Power Plant is being gutted so the building can be used for economic redevelopment. When this project transpires the river frontage to the east of the building can be linked with Louis F. Adado/Riverfront Park and Wentworth Park, The renovations to these park - lands will include new docks, walks, water features and landscaping. Wentworth Park is located west across the river from the Lansing Center. Because of this it may also be targeted for major restoration to enhance the view and provide for special events near the Lansing Center, possibly in the form of an outdoor amphitheater. A connection to the River Trail should also be explored in the south end of town; a suggested location is along the power lines which run from the east side of the city to the west side. The older sections of the River Trail are also in need of renovation. Particularly the trail through Louis F. Adado/Riverfront Park, the areas in and around the museum district and South Grand Parking Ramp, and the section near Spring Street which crosses an industrial area. An easement should be acquired behind the S& S Dye Company to re-route the trail behind the businesses and off the street (Spring Street): This area creates safety problems with the industrial businesses along this street. There are also sections of the trail in this area which are as little as five feet wide and are a mix of asphalt and concrete for surfacing. The areas throughout Louis F. Adado/ Riverfront Park are showing their age in the asphalt surface as well as the boardwalk. Amenities along the River Trail are also showing their age, as most of them are close to 25 years old. These amenities should be replaced and increased in numbers, as the popularity of the trail has increased since their inception. Some areas of the River Trail provide no trash receptacles, no benches, no lighting, no telephones, etc. To reduce the amount of litter along the trail, the number of receptacles should be increased along the entire trail. These receptacles should be permanent structures to avoid vandals misplacing them from their locations. The benches along the trail currently are showing their age. These benches should be replaced and added to more locations along the trail. Safety is also a large concern for the users of the trail. Increased levels of safety could be provided with lighting along the entire trail and telephones located at strategic locations. Other Pedestrian and Bicycle Access: With the growing popularity of bike ways, the department should evaluate pedestrian and bicycle access throughout the city. Access for these users should be safe and controlled with linkage to neighborhoods, shopping centers and downtown attractions. Efforts should be pursued to provide connections to points of interest within the city as well as to adjacent communities. It was also suggested that access be provided across major streets such as Business 27 on the north end, for children to cross. 5.30 SCOTT ART & GARDEN and COOLEY GARDENS Recently both the Scott House and Cooley Gardens have enjoyed renewed attention. Currently, Scott House is used by eleven groups as a permanent meeting site, with approximately 19 meetings a month and the involvement of 200-300 people. This is an increase from the last five years. Two of these groups, the Potter Park Zoological Society and Capital City Riverfest, have their offices in the house. The house is also used by various city departments for meetings and training. Although the Zoo Society is expected to move into new offices at the new Potter Park Entry Complex in 2000, Scott Center continues to serve the needs of an ever increasing community non-profit organization population. A master plan for the Scott House was completed in 1996. This plan outlined exterior and interior renovations, as well as site improvements. These improvements include electrical, plumbing and mechanical upgrades, structural improvements, an exterior renovation returning the house to its original English Tudor style and interior architectural improvements. See the master plan for more detail. These renovations will help promote its future use as a meeting location for city staff and civic organizations. The department will continue to invest in the house, returning it to safe and usable standards. An attempt will be made to recruit private organizations to adopt the house and generate revenues that will sustain required maintenance. Additional custodial services should be identified to maintain the house properly. Discussions have also suggested the Scott Center be used as a welcoming center. Cooley Gardens has been renovated and returned to much of its original beauty. Extensive work has been completed concerning bed cleaning, plant pruning and replanting. The river bank behind the Scott House, which was once carefully planted and cared for as gardens by the original residents, is also being considered for rejuvenation. The riverbank, erosion problems and some landscaping along the river bank are proposed projects that will enhance the Scott House and Cooley Gardens. The Parks and Recreation Department will continue to work in conjunction with the Michigan Women's Historical Center, located adjacent to the gardens, to maintain the Scott Center Complex and Cooley Gardens to provide the maintenance required for the facility, grounds and garden. The House is currently being studied to determine if it can be restored. It is forecasted that the master plan will provide the direction required for major interior and exterior improvements to the house. Therefore, renovation projects are anticipated within this next five- year period, from code compliance to major restoration. SKATE BOARD PARKS, INLINE SKATING, AND BMX FACILITIES New trends in recreation include skateboarding, inline skating and BMX biking. The City of Lansing currently does not provide facilities for this type of recreation and is in the process of exploring possibilities for the construction of facilities for each of these sports. 5.31 Skateboarding: The•department brought in a national "expert" in skate park construction and has done extensive research for the construction of a facility for this sport. Currently, funding is allotted for the task of research and design. Through research it has been found that it may be best to provide one large skateboard facility with satellite facilities throughout the park system. The large facility would be a minimum of 15,000 square feet with the smaller satellite facilities 10,000-15,000 square feet or less. The skateboard facilities would combine street course rails, bowls, -and other skate surfaces popular with this sport. Inline ,Skating: The department needs to explore facilities for inline skating, particularly roller hockey. Inline skaters currently use the River Trail for exercise and recreation. In neighborhood areas, children are often playing roller hockey in the street or on the tennis courts. Fenced, hard court areas should be provided for neighborhood children to play roller hockey. BMX Biking: The department has been researching areas for the construction of a bicycle moto-cross (BMX) facility operated by a parent group as not to increase operational costs to the city. SOCCER The sport of soccer has become more and more popular over the past few years. The Hope Soccer Complex, constructed by Ingham County Parks on City of Lansing Park land, is in need of lighted fields. The Park Board has suggested additional soccer fields be constructed at St. Joseph Park. SPECIAL EVENTS Service of city-wide special events by the Parks and Recreation Department has been down -sized in recent years, but are still major functions in the community. Corporate sponsorship now contribute a major role in these events as they have recognized the benefits of community and public relations by becoming involved and co -sponsoring city-wide events. This corporate interest in sponsorships of special community events must be nurtured and encouraged in order for the city to be able to continue to improve the availability of events and activities throughout the year. The 4th of July Celebration, the department's best attended event, offers activities for individuals of all ages. The 4th of July program includes events such as a concert, a parade with a community marching band and fireworks which alone draw a crowd of over 35,000 people. There are eight Neighborhood Concerts in the Park that take place in the summer months in various parks. Both of these events receive major contributions of corporate sponsorship to make them possible. 5.32 Special events at the Turner -Dodge House include the popular Victorian Family Christmas, the Time Travelers History Camp, guided tours, the Mystery Dinner Theater and the Spring Fling/Easter Egg'Hunt. Fenner Nature Center features the Maple Sugar and Apple Butter weekend festivals, as well as day camps, color walks, star watch, and educational programs. Other city -funded recreational programs and events range from sporting programs to holiday events, to young children's enrichment to fifty plus programs. A listing can be found in Section 4. - Currently all of the special events could be enhanced by additional staffing, department/inter- department cooperation and support, purchases or rentals of equipment such as permanent or portable stages for performances, public address systems, promotional materials and an increase in marketing. Additional special events which the department participates in by offering support in staff time and materials include Capital City Riverfest, a Labor Day weekend family festival held in -Louis F. Adado River front Park, Silver Bells in the City, begins the December holiday season, the Michigan Parades Into the 21 st Century Parade, which draws over 60,000 people to downtown Lansing, the Car Capital Celebration celebrates the contribution of the auto industry to the Lansing community, with Lansing factories producing more cars than any other area, drawing over 20,000 people with this event, Fest Eve, the alcohol free New Year's Eve celebration sponsored jointly with the City of East Lansing and Michigan State University, Veterans' Day Parade and Memorial Day Parade, plus various concerts, walk/run/jog events, and celebrations most weekends through spring, summer, and fall, and several special events at the Potter Park Zoo hosted by the Potter Park Zoological Society including Boo at the Zoo at Halloween, Wonderland of Lights and Clown Days at the Zoo. SUMMER PROGRAMS Historically, the summer playground programs, which are currently called "Kid's Camps," were the model for other cities throughout the state. In 1977 the city offered 28 summer neighborhood park site programs structured for the ages of 5-16. The programs were offered Monday through Friday from 12:30 to 8:30 P.M. Each site was staffed with two leaders. Specialists in the areas of crafts, sports, and special events planned and coordinated activities for the 28 sites throughout the summer. Economic recessionary conditions of the 1980's resulted in decisions to reduce the number of general fund supported sites to what it is today. Presently, with the assistance of the park millage and Community Development Block Grants, the city offers 22 neighborhood sites which are staffed a minimum of four days a week primarily from 9:30 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. Foster, Gier and Letts Community Centers offer a drop -in program four days per week (M-Th) from 10:00 A.M. to 3:30 P.M. and Fridays from 10:00 A.M. to 12:30 P.M. Breakfast and lunch are served at the centers. The centers also offer field trips once per week. There is a Totally Teens program running at Woodcreek, Gardner and Forest View Schools four days per week from 6:00-9:00 P.M. and this team program also runs at the centers three days per week from 4:00-8:45 P.M. Super Thursday teen trips are especially popular. 5.33 The Neighborhood Park Program Five Year Plan Committee comprised of neighborhood association representatives expressed a need to provide for additional neighborhood programming. The committee identified several neighborhood sites which they feel need a summer recreation program for the youth, including teens. In addition, the committee identified a need for mobile recreation programs targeted for neighborhoods without access to city parks due to distance and/or major street barriers. Other summer needs addressed from the community were an indoor aquatic program in the schools, teen activities, year-round community center for south Lansing and a transportation program to provide access to and from the community centers. Citizen requests for additional programming within the neighborhoods were also clearly expressed within the Parks and Recreation Resident Survey and the series of public meetings. Emphasis should also be placed on sharing facilities with schools and other communities and scheduling programs to meet the needs of users. Additional recreational programming within the centers and neighborhood parks must be reevaluated as a possible deterrent to youth problems, as well as increasing the overall quality of life for Lansing residents. "Shared facilities" is a relatively new concept for the Parks and Recreation Department and school district and therefore policies and procedures will require additional lead time to be negotiated successfully. WASHINGTON PARK ICE SKATING COMPLEX The department operates an outdoor artificial ice rink from Thanksgiving through the end of February at Washington Park. The rink provides an opportunity for recreational open skating, lessons and hockey leagues. Additional recreational programs also utilize this facility, particularly in -line skating during the summer months. The City of Lansing entered into a partnership with the Greater Lansing Amateur Hockey Association and constructed a domed indoor ice surface in 1996. The hockey association financed a portion of the cost of the construction and in return will receive reduced rental rates to allow for recovery of their capital expenditure. The domed rink utilizes the same mechanical cooling systems as the outdoor rink. The dome is open from October thru March, allowing for expanded skating opportunities for the residents of Lansing. The department has found that with the construction of other ice arenas in the area, the ice rink is underutilized much of the time. Opportunities to regain the market should be explored to find our niche in the market. The department should also explore the feasibility of year round use, and reach out to schools for day use with transportation provided to assist the schools in getting the children to the complex. A scholarship/grant program should also be established. The shared service facility (warming house) for the rinks was constructed in 1998 and provides for better customer comfort, expanded concession and service operations and is accessible for persons with disabilities. Both the service facility and the City portion of the dome construction were built with millage dollars. The outdoor ice slab is over 20 years old and is approaching its end. A decision will need to be 5.34 made to replace or convert to other uses such as tennis or a skateboard street course as examples. Plans are underway to replace the hockey boards on the outdoor rink as well as replace the oldest and least efficient of the cooling system compressors to ensure that the rinks will be ensured for years to come. Both of these projects are being done with millage money. The Parks and Recreation Department has reduced the number of natural rinks previously provided as a cost cutting measure, due to their unpredictable nature and high maintenance costs. - WATER BASED RECREATION It has been documented by the DNR in past state recreation plans, that the mid -Michigan area is lacking in water based recreation facilities. Therefore Lansing, as well as Ingham County, has been working toward creating water based opportunities. Some water based recreation potentials include waterfront improvements, promotion of the Brenke Fish Ladder, River Trail improvements at Michigan Avenue including a downtown amphitheater, promenade and waterfront enhancements, expansion of the River Trail to create access to the river for such activities as fishing, boating and other water related sports and leisure, and to purchase, acquire or lease and develop any and all waterfront property that further promotes water based recreation on behalf of Lansing's citizens. OTHER ACTIVE AND PASSIVE RECREATION FACILITIES The department sponsors many other active recreation facilities such as, soccer, organized football, tennis, volleyball and other sports. The department will continue to support these active sports as demand is determined. Likewise, passive recreation activities will continue to be developed, enhanced and/or expanded; such as fishing facilities like docks and piers, canoeing opportunities, winter sports like sledding, cross-country skiing, boating, picnicking, walking, running and jogging. 5.35 APPENDIX A FOCUS GROUP REPORTS FIVE YEAR MASTER PLAN FOCUS GROUPS Lansing, 2000-2005 FOCUS GROUP CHAIR Access Joan Lenhard -Aquatics Mary Winegar Athletic Facilities (Park/School) & Programs Tony Noyola Cemeteries (Lansing Municipal) Carol Abbott Community Centers & Senior Citizens Debbie Balan Cultural Arts and Historical Elizabeth Homer Downtown Parks Robert Ford Forestry (Street and Park) Paul Dykema Golf Operations (Lansing Municipal) Don Ballard Infrastructure (Park & Recreation System) Phil Dorland Natural Areas Clara Bratton Neighborhood and City Wide Parks Phil Dorland Neighborhood Park Programs Murdock Jemerson Oak Park Maintenance Complex Phil Dorland Potter Park and Zoo Gerry Brady Regional Recreation Robert Ford Scott Art & Garden Diane Townsend Washington Park Ice Skating Complex Don Ballard A.1 FOCUS GROUP: ACCESS FOCUS GROUP MEMBERS: Joan Lenhard, Chairperson, Therapeutic Recreation Specialist, MS., CTRS Marge Moore, parent of consumer, secretary for Moore Living Center Rebecca Oakes, MA., CRC, Peckham Industries Jo Sinha, MSW, Peckham Industries Jun Veurink, Educator, Lansing School District Deb Coward, CTRS, Rehabilitation Services, Ingham Medical Regional Center East Jan DeValle, CRRN, Capital Area Center for Independent Living Jean Harris, Capital Area Center for Independent Living Marsha Moers, Capital Area Center for Independent Living Nancy McKay, P.T. Sparrow Mac Facility Pain Management Program PARKS FACILITY PRIORITIES: 1. All parks must increase signage, provide accurate maps, topographical relief maps for parks with trails or features. For special events provide video, tape cassette, or CD audio services. 2. Scott Woods - Work with the DNR to change the access on the bridges for people to use the trail system. Monthly grading/put hard pack material on the paths. Establish fishing areas with landings. Keep area open between Hawk Island and Scott Woods to increase programs and access for patients in rehabilitation and for people who use the Respite Home for services. Grade the area, increase play structures, provide better lighting to reduce teen hangout and drug distribution. Potter Park/Zoo - Establish an area for raised beds for gardening by the disabled. Throughout the zoo different groups or organizations have sponsored garden flower beds. Raised beds allow for a group in the community who is disabled to participate in this service. 4. Fenner Nature Center - Provide accurate signage for the trails with guide areas, trail patterns, audio or video presentation options. At the trail head provide a topographical relief map. Publish this information for all events. 5. Turner Dodge - Provide audio and video presentations for programs and special events. Publish this information for all events. RECREATION PROGRAM PRIORITIES: Provide people with disabilities an opportunity to explore a class for inclusion one time before registration/payment, i.e., sample day. A.2 2. Provide an open drop -in program at a community center such as the senior program has established. This increases services for daily programs, Leisure Education and those people not able to access CMH services. 3. Partnership with the MAC for aquatic therapy programs. Develop program at the MAC in therapy pool to treat outpatients who no longer have insurance coverage in treatment. 4. Review practices that limit general recreation programs (i.e., transportation for the summer to include accessible transportation, Halloween haunted sites need to be accessible in design). 5. Review/update policies and procedures to reflect current practices in the field of legislation and litigation. 6. Establish and maintain a budget for making reasonable accommodations. This could be a line item in the Special Recreation Services' Therapeutic Recreation Section or part of the Administrative budget. This practice identifies the willingness to comply with the ADA (i.e., to be used for interpreters, additional staid staff training). 7. Provide open aquatic time for walkers, stretchers vs. lap swim. 8. Provide space within facilities for additional daytime programs for people who are not eligible for services through Community Mental Health. 9. Increase Leisure Education programs by offering them more than one time per week. 10. Increase programs or special events in the school district during school time for the disabled. 11. Establish a travel program with sponsorship to reduce costs. 12. Establish additional classes in art, dance and music. 13. Provide an open drop -in program established at a community center such as senior programs have provided. 14. Increase programs offered throughout the year for all age groups. 15. Provide mentors for inclusion and buddy systems. A.3 FOCUS GROUP: AOUATICS FOCUS GROUP MEMBERS: Mary Winegar, Chairperson, Special Recreation Services Supervisor Denise Lynch, Special Recreation Services Coordinator Murdock Jemerson, Manager of Leisure Services Steven Widder, Manager of Grounds & Landscape Maintenance Marty Riel, Building Maintenance Supervisor PRIORITIES: Completion of maintenance issues as listed below. 2. Locate water playground on the south end of town. Site should have a 200 ft. "kill" zone that is visible from the street or major thoroughfare. No organic matter in "kill" zone. 3. Improve seating for parents at both locations. Location should include permanent shaded areas containing no trees or any organic matter. 4. Expand swimming programs to include special interest classes and special events such as basic canoeing and boating, scuba, and swimming exhibitions. 5. Improve the overall aesthetics of entry ways to Hunter and Moores Pools. 6. Install water slide to replace the old one at Moores Pool. 7. Continue to foster swimming programs to "grow" future lifeguarding staff. DISCUSSION: Maintenance issues continue to be the highest concern for this committee.' Over this past summer (1999) the Ingham County Health Department cited both pools with numerous violations that ultimately led to the temporary closing (two days) of Hunter Pool. While water quality was not an issue, violations centered around preventative and safety issues. For example, the department was required to replace its older chlorination system prior to opening. The system was on "back order" and we were forced to shut down. Other violations included repainting our on deck water depth markings, upgrading plumbing fixtures, cleaning off chipped paint from the locker room ceilings, and having the proper pool water quality documentation forms. The next priority was to improve the pools by making them more "parent friendly." We want to encourage parents to be on deck and out of the way of the lifeguards to supervise their younger children. By installing seating on deck and out of the way of the guards, parents will be allowed AA on deck. This past summer we allowed children under 42" tall in the pools with parental or adult supervision. Our next concern focused on the need to have newer attractions to the pools. The upgrades to Moores Pool were very well accepted by the community. However, the results of a survey of swimming pool participants showed a overwhelming request for more attractions, especially a water slide. The survey results are discussed in the "Neighborhood Park Programs Focus Group" report. A water slide at both pools would be a great "shot in the arm" for the pools. The concept of "water playgrounds" was discussed as a new feature for areas not in close proximity of the two pools. This is especially true for the south end of Lansing where we do not have a community center or a swimming pool. These "water playgrounds" will feature "zero depth" concrete pads with cascading, spraying, colorful water toys. Ample seating will be available for parents of younger children. Four `water playgrounds", one per ward, would be proposed. A.5 FOCUS GROUP: ATHLETIC FACILITIES (Park/School) & PROGRAMS FOCUS GROUP MEMBERS: Tony Noyola, Chairperson Sally Potter, Women's Baseball Kevin Karpinski, Mens Baseball Bob Every, Fastpitch Softball Ron Smoker, Adult Softball Planning Contact: Mark Hornung Ken Galbraith, Youth Sports Rod Sanville, Sr. Baseball Michael Wagner, Mens Basketball Michael West, Youth Football After reviewing the 1995-2000 Master Plan and looking at the priorities we established in comprising that plan, it is evident that as time changes so must our priorities. In the competitive sports arena, we are challenged more now than ever before. The private sector has pushed the door wide open for sports that five years ago had not even surfaced as sports. As a public entity in the sports world, we are limited in the scope of activities that we can offer that involve liability issues or we deem dangerous to the participant or spectator. In this vein, it is our mission to use the next five year plan to upgrade our current athletic facilities to enhance our park system. In reviewing our "Priorities" list from our last Master Plan, many of our priorities remain the same. Providing an additional lighted baseball diamond for our adult baseball program, adding a maintenance/restroom/concession building to our current adult baseball facility, developing a master maintenance plan for all our sports facilities as well as need for new or updated facilities for some sports will be identified according to need. Projects that were not addressed in the 1995-2000 Master Plan will be addressed in this Master Plan. PRIORITIES: Developing a Master Plan for Ranney Park is a good start for a park that has seen limited use since the decline of fastpitch softball. The entire park needs to be addressed for future use in regard to the grounds north and south of the softball field. A Master Plan that would include different types of activities, could enhance the use of this park immensely. The softball diamond is need of: new lighting, new padding around the light poles inside the backstop area, new foul ball netting above the backstop. Kircher Park is still in dire need of a restroom facility. It is our only lighted facility, baseball or softball, that has no restroom facility for its participants. A restroom/concession/maintenance facility would enhance Kircher as one of the premier baseball facilities in our area. Serious consideration should also be given to Kircher's current lighting system in regard to light poles and lamp system and scoreboard. These systems are starting to show the aging process and the scoreboard is now obsolete and cannot be repaired. 2. Developing a Master Maintenance Plan for all of our electrical needs is a top priority for the A.6 Lifetime Sports Section. Marty Riel from the Management Services Department has been instrumental in helping us identify what types of problems we have, most related to age of our facilities and equipment, and will continue to assist us in developing our Master Maintenance Plan not only for our electrical needs, but also our general maintenance issues.. A lighted youth complex would be beneficial from a maintenance standpoint. This complex should include areas for multiple activity use such as baseball, soccer and football. Locations for this type of facility should be given top priority so that it can be accessible to the majority of our participants. 3. Even with the completion of the new Hope Soccer facility, Lansing still needs a lighted soccer facility for evening games in the fall. Hope Soccer complex is also servicing the Greater Lansing area as well as the City of Lansing programming needs. Investigating the purchase of the property adjacent to the 119'h Armory Park to build a lighted youth sports facility to include soccer and football, could be a possible solution. The location of the site would make it a prime location for the majority of youth that participate in our youth programs. Continue to upgrade the facilities at Westside Park to include renovation of the restroom facility to create a concession area to help promote activities at the park, light the fenced field (Westside North) and build a pavilion on the west side and north side of the park for family and special event use. Lighting the north diamond will help accommodate the growth of our senior softball population as well as move the modified league off Gier #1 to a diamond more of a fastpitch caliber. Adding a scoreboard and upgrading the irrigation system will complete the renovation at Westside North. Explore lighting the Everett High School baseball diamond to accommodate the continued growth of our senior baseball and women's baseball leagues. This will allow all three leagues of adult baseball to use all facilities throughout the summer and fall months. Sycamore Park is another site that could use field renovation; a field irrigation system, fencing to extend beyond the first and third base lines, renovation of the mens and women's restroom and an entire outfield renovation could rejuvenate Sycamore to its 1980's form. Continued upgrades at Davis Park should include: a third lighted diamond, scorers shed/concession/ maintenance building, irrigate the three diamonds, and installation of three scoreboards would complete the softball portion of the park. On the youth side of the picture, the youth fields need fencing to extend down the first and third base side lines, an irrigation system and additional parking to accommodate cars for both fields during transition times. 4. Ice time availability in Lansing is at an all time high. There is enough ice time for both the adult and youth leagues without sending youngsters out at all hours of the night. The issue of how to get youth with financial restrictions involved in ice hockey should be addressed similar to our current athletic scholarship program, which is tied into a family's financial need. Since this program is run out of the Golf Operations section, the Manager of Golf Operations should establish a fee structure based on our scholarship program. Constant changes in our sports programming establish different criteria for programming at each age group. Through M.R.P.A. annual conferences and our regional recreation network, we plan on keeping abreast of the latest trends in recreation as well as the latest trends in traditional A.7 sports. Our coaches certification program, N.Y.S.C.A., has recently updated their video presentation that will allow coaches and clinicians to talk more about local sport issues regarding leagues here in Lansing. Development of a coaches "Handout" for each sport is in the works and will include minimum expectations that coaches and parents can expect as well as some helpful coaching tips for all coaches and their assistants. 5. Continued use of focus groups and written evaluations for all of our sports programs will give us a better perspective of what we will need to do to stay on top of our game and also give us notice of what programming needs to change or delete. Focus groups also give us an opportunity to recruit officials for that particular sport. With our new N.Y. S.C.A. coaches certification program, discussion time with coaches will give us an opportunity to discuss sport specific issues such as expectations for participants, coaching skills, awards for participants other than those of the department and what to do for next season. Additionally, we would like to incorporate off season clinics and programs for coaches and players of sports such as baseball, softball, basketball and soccer. Most of these sports have summer camps offered by our department where youth can attend for morning or afternoon sessions to improve their skills. Getting coaches and participants our seasonal program guides may play and instrumental role in this endeavor. Clinics and training programs will continue to play a vital role in our effort to prepare officials for their particular sport. Just as our coaches need their skills improved, so do our officials. Off season instruction and on field evaluation before the season starts is imperative to becoming a good official and the Lifetime Sports Staff will make it mandatory for officials to be registered with the appropriate sanctioning body to officiate sports in our programs. Seasonal staff will be asked to take on vital roles in promoting officiating that will enhance our programs by offering instruction in the off season and checking with M.A.S.A. (softball), M.H.S.A.A. (youth basketball), N.C.A.A. and A.A.B.C. (adult baseball) and U.S.A. Volleyball (adult volleyball) to insure we are getting registered officials and to help us offer clinics designed for our officials as well as full time and part time staff. As is stated, part time or seasonal staff will play a bigger role in day to day operations in regard to programming in the evening hours and report back to full time staff with problems and recommendations to assist coaches and officials. DISCUSSION: The implementation of master plans to address specific issues such as maintenance, new facility construction and re -design of existing facilities will be of utmost concern to the Lifetime Sports section in the years to come. Whether to build new facilities or upgrade current facilities seems to take up considerable time and effort. Sites like Davis Park and Westside Park are perfect examples of how to take existing facilities and expand them to provide more activities without having to destroying the current landscape or green space of the park. Maintenance plans for our electric and infrastructure needs will be a top priority in the years to come. The majority of our facilities are in good shape, however facilities like St. Joseph Park need a variety of work including both field maintenance and facility maintenance to the existing restroom facility. These types of issues exist in many of our current parks and will be addressed one by one. An additional A.8 lighted baseball facility, hopefully Everett High School, continues to take a top priority for our adult baseball program. As our adult leagues flourish, evening games continue to be in high demand. A restroom/maintenance/concession facility at Kircher Field will make it the premier diamond in our area. It will complete a renovation project at Kircher that has encompassed a new infield, batting cages and in the near future a new scoreboard. We will continue to pursue sites that can accommodate more than one sport for our youth programming. Soccer continues to grow in our community, however, football has made a small comeback and will need a site with proper facilities. The 119' Armory Park could be re -designed if additional property can be accessed to provide for field use and parking. With Davis Park adding a third lighted diamond, the possibility of hosting "big time" softball could be around the comer for Lansing. Westside Park also has that kind of potential if renovations to that site can be realized. Frances Park needs to remain a family facility. A.9 FOCUS GROUP: CEMETERIES a ANSING MUNICIPAL) FOCUS GROUP MEMBERS: Carol Abbott, Chairperson Note: Due to the fact that the City was pursuing the possibility of outsourcing management of the cemeteries at the time of updating the five year plan, it was felt that forming a formal committee might be misleading. The outsourcing was also part of the 1995-2000 five year plan. A questionnaire was sent to the following funeral homes in the Lansing area to get their viewpoints and opinions : Chapel in the Pines, Estes-Leadley, Gorsline Runciman Co, Palmer Bush, Riley, and Tiffany. Five questionnaires were returned; one did not indicate the funeral home responding. The questions and number of responses at each level follow: 1 = least satisfied, 5 = most satisfied 1. Cost of grave site 2. Cost of open/close 3. Availability of grave sites 4. Condition of cemeteries 5. Hours of operation 1= no need, 5 = great need 6. Need for cremation only sites 7. Need for more monument sites 1 2 3 4 5 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 (1 no response) 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 1 2 2 Two other comments were made. One regarding hours of operation in relation to Monday burials and one suggesting equipment for the graveside service, i.e., tent, lowering device, etc. PRIORITIES: In the event that the management of the Lansing Municipal Cemeteries are not outsourced, the following needs were shown. 1. Development of more monument lots. 2. Development of cremation only sites. The current (FY2000) budget provides funds for a columbarium. This will be done as soon as a decision is made on the management proposal. 3. There have been requests from the community on enhancement of Section P in Evergreen Cemetery in the form of a road around the perimeter and planting of trees. A.10 FOCUS GROUP: COMMUNITY CENTERS & SENIOR CITIZENS FOCUS GROUP MEMBERS: Debbie Balan, Chairperson, Community Centers Supervisor Ted Jones, Foster Community Center Harold Stierley, Miller Road Center Lucille Stierley, Miller Road Center William Smith, Letts Community Center Virginia DuBois, Miler Road Center Dick DuBois, Miller Road Center Julius Scott, Miller Road Center PRIORITIES: Developed for each individual community center Foster 1. Provide protective covering for the remaining radiators still used in the heating system. 2. Renovate the kitchen facilities. Gier 1. Expand gym to include bleachers. 2. Increase parking availability at the ball park. 3. Build a pavilion at the ball park. Replace playground equipment by center with up to date equipment and install additional equipment near pavilion. Develop soccer field with bleachers. 4 5 Letts 1. Expand gym to add bleachers, concession area and dividers. 2. Upgrade electrical service of the Jim Hoye Memorial Library for use of computers. Miller 1. Heating and air conditioning systems need to be evaluated and updated so that each system used can be controlled on site. 2. Paint building interior. Make interior aesthetically pleasing. 3. Repave and restripe parking lot and entrance road; repair cement handicapper cut to sidewalk. DISCUSSION: It was noted that Miller has not had any improvements made in several years. It was expressed by the group that Miller should be given priority since the other three community centers were renovated over the last couple years. A.11 FOCUS GROUP: CULTURAL ARTS AND HISTORICAL FOCUS GROUP MEMBERS: Elizabeth Homer, Chairperson, Turner -Dodge Curator Turner -Dodge Board Members: G. Allen R Armitage G. Wiskemann M. Allen J. Roe PRIORITIES: 1. Provide for staffing, programming and marketing of the Center, beautification of Dodge Park including stabilization of the river bank and further development of the River Walk and Heritage Garden with funded support of the park millage. 2. Completion of Phase H. This should include updating electrical and mechanical systems, renovation/restoration of interpretive period rooms, new parking on the west side, and landscaping improvements. Phase H depends heavily on local support from the private sector, as well as grant funding resources such as federal preservation and foundation grants. The Friends of Turner -Dodge House, Inc. have initiated Phase II funding efforts. 3. Completion of Phase III. This should include reconstruction of the two-story house to the west of the Turner -Dodge House to serve as a Visitor Orientation Center, handicapper access, and interior restructuring to serve as offices, archival and storage area, gift shop, exhibit area, interpretive area, and banquet room for revenue generating private functions. The City should seize the opportunity to acquire adjacent properties as indicated in the Master Plan for the Turner -Dodge House and Park as they become available. 4. Completion of the replication of a turn -of -the -century Carriage House to the northwest of the Turner -Dodge House for interpretive programming. The Friends of Turner -Dodge House, Inc. are initiating funding for the construction of the Carriage House. 5. The home and curtilage will serve the people of Lansing by functioning as a "living" Cultural Heritage Center and interpreting capital region history (1845-1945). It shall be open to the public on a year-round basis for cultural, recreational, and educational programs. DISCUSSION: The growing awareness of the need for preservation of significant landmarks and the increased interest in local history and cultural heritage programs have generated public support for renovation of facilities like the Turner -Dodge House. The educational and recreational benefit to the local community, to local revitalization projects (the Historic Commercial District of Old Town, north Lansing) and the increased potential for tourism dollars make this a viable project. A.12 FOCUS GROUP: DOWNTOWN PARKS FOCUS GROUP MEMBERS: The following persons participated in the Downtown Development Focus Group. The group assisted in developing five goals for the next five year Parks Plan. Two meetings were held regarding this effort. The first meeting was an input and brainstorming session held on August 19, 1999. The second meeting was for goal formulation, held on September 9, 1999. The asterisks indicate that the person was absent from one or more meetings. Robert Ford, Chairperson, Landscape Architects and Planners Joey Berndt, Principal Shopping District Amy Collett, Old Town Main street Phil Dorland, Deputy Director, Lansing Parks Department * Paul Dykema, Forestry Manager, Lansing Parks Department * Jeff Kacos , MSU Division of Campus Parks and Planning * John McComb, Principal Analyst, Lansing Finance Department * Mike McDonald, State of Michigan, Recreation Division Kris Nicholoff, Lansing Park Board * Mark Nixon, Lansing State Journal William Rieske, Lansing Planning Department * Ronald Roush, Lansing Community College, Facilities Director * Jerry Roe, River Trail User Joan Sheldon, Downtown Neighborhood Association & Friends of Durant Park Peter Sullivan, Lansing Entertainment Public Facilities Association Leanne Stites, Principal Shopping District, Director Diane Townsend, Special Events, Lansing Parks Department Tanya Moore, Landscape Architect, Lansing Parks Department The area defined for the "Downtown Parks" by the committee is bordered by Pine Street to the west, Northeast Street to the north, Pennsylvania Avenue to the east, and Hazel Street to the south. The parks that were considered within this area include; Adado Riverfront (east and west), Burchard, Cherry Street, Cooley Gardens, Durant, Ferris, Larch, Oak, Reutter, River Point, Scott Center, Turner, Turner -Dodge, and Wentworth. The Washington Mall (north and south of Michigan Avenue) was excluded because it is governed by the Principal Shopping District. PRIORITIES: Maintenance: Provide better maintenance to the downtown parks and River Trail to have orderly, clean and well maintained parks and trail by creating a policy on maintenance governing the levels of maintenance in various areas of the parks, add litter containers throughout, add benches where needed, provide more maintenance personnel throughout, increase the frequency of maintenance cycles or provide a higher standard of maintenance, light the trail and parks where A.13 needed, refurbish the River Trail and parks with capital improvements that restore the original beauty and function ofthe park elements, restore the boardwalks, pathways, sidewalks, landscape, flower gardens, river edge, and fundamental areas within the existing parks. The results will demonstrate vitality and proper use ofthe parks and reduce the tendency to vandalize and destroy public property. 2. Partnerships: Encourage the development of partnerships and collaborations between the city departments, private enterprise, and the community. These may take many different forms, such as encouraging contractors and companies to donate funds or labor to beautify specific parks, sponsoring a competition by inviting companies to compete to create beautiful landscaped areas within the parks or to create beautiful entries in specific areas to welcome people into the downtown area, or by contributing money to support volunteer groups. The partnerships will also be obligated to maintain the areas throughout the year. If successful, they will be invited to continue the effort on an annual basis. In addition, partnerships may form between governmental agencies, foundations, charities, or community organizations. 3. Master Plans: Create new Master Plans for Adado Riverfront Park, Burchard, Durant, Ferris, Oak, Reutter, and Wentworth. Once these park plans are completed then the remaining parks should be reviewed and new master plans considered by the administration. 4. Linkages and Access: The focus group felt it was important to provide "linkages" to and throughout the downtown. The purpose is to make pedestrian, bicycle, and automobile connections within the downtown to allow easier access to all of the parks that will support the continued use and vitality of the downtown. Linkages can be accomplished in many ways., for example; provide more east/west walkways, connect Lansing Community College by creating more walks that lead through the campus to the River Trail and Adado Park, provide parking for park users, provide bicycle paths and on -road bicycle lanes, utilize river boats to transport people to various ports, and encourage a trolley system that will allow people to park near the city and catch a trolley to various parks and events. In addition, signs should be added to direct and inform users of the various parks and events.'- Encourage businesses to open their shops to the river and park side and promote interaction between park users and the store owners. Specific linkages that were identified but not limited to include the following: Connect the River Trail from Wentworth park to Adado Riverfront Park along the Grand River through the Ottawa Station, currently owned by the Board of Water and Light. Connect the River Trail from Wentworth park to the south under the Michigan Avenue Bridge. Extend the River Trail from the bridge north of Elm Street to the Cooley Gardens and the Scott Center. 5. Special Events: Encourage quality events downtown. The quantity of events is not as important A.14 as the quality. The programming of special events is very labor intensive and needs appropriate financial support by the city and volunteers. Therefore, funds should be set aside to guarantee the planning, implementation and clean up of special events. In addition, more staff will be necessary to work on the events. Cooperation between city agencies, other governmental departments, foundations, or other community groups to enhance or sponsor special events should be encouraged. DISCUSSION: It will be important for the Parks & Recreation Department to continue to participate in the redevelopment of the downtown parks and programs. The city's revitalization efforts over the past five years are impressive with the addition of Oldsmobile Stadium with park and plaza, the additional land acquisition provided by the state to Ferris Park, the extension of the River Trail from Riverpoint Park to Moores Park, redeveloping or adding new playgrounds to the downtown parks, and the redevelopment of the promenade along the riverside of the Lansing Center. In addition to the development efforts, many programs have been offered and it will be important to continue to demonstrate the sustained interest in Lansing's Downtown by continuing and improving many of the programs offered to the public. Underlaying these projects is the strong desire to set a higher standard of maintenance of our existing parks and a higher standard of quality programs. A new entity was added during the five year period known as Lansing Entertainment Public Facilities Association (LEPFA). This group currently manages Oldsmobile Stadium, Lansing Center, and the City Market. The LEPFA also suggested that a major new event to be known as the Music Festival be staged at Adado Riverfront Park. Should this come to pass, the park will need major improvements to support this and other quality events. It will be important to include this organization along with others in planning for redevelopment of the downtown park system. A.15 FOCUS GROUP: FORESTRY (STREET AND PARK) FOCUS GROUP MEMBERS: Paul Dykema, Chairperson, Forestry Manager Phil Dorland, Deputy Director Parks and Recreation Ron Callen Ed Eckhart Jenny Grau Rick Kibby PRIORITIES: Integrate our tree inventorywith a geographic positioning/information system and update the tree inventory. The improved information from the integration of the tree inventory and the G.P.S./G.I.S. will improve worker productivity, management decision making and the amount of information available to the public about trees in our community. This will result in lower costs to the city through reduced travel time and improved tree species composition. 2. Tree pruning cycles should be reduced to a level consistent will arboricultural standards for tree care. The national standard for tree pruning cycles is once every 10 years for large trees and once every three years for small trees. Our current tree pruning cycles are 17+ years for large and five years for small trees. This goal can be attained through the addition of modest amounts of equipment and personnel to the section. Attaining this goal will reduce storm damage to trees resulting in savings to the city in the form of reduced storm cleanup costs, improved air quality due to larger/more trees acting as filters, and improved property values due to an aesthetically pleasing living environment for residents. Increase public awareness of trees. The "Michigan Avenue Survey" and feedback from our yearly tree planting activities indicates that 94% of Lansing residents approve of and want publicly owned trees in their surroundings. In spite of this appreciation of trees, they are often taken for granted and remain unnoticed until they die or are cut down. Public awareness of trees can be increased through outreach programs like tree walks, Arbor Day activities, weekly television programs, planting historic trees in historic neighborhoods, adopt -a -tree programs, memorial tree programs, and a citizen's tree academy. 4. Improve street and park landscapes through tree planning and planting. Park usage plans should be reviewed to avoid future conflicts between newly planted trees, and both passive and active recreational activities. Planting plans should whenever possible reflect the history of the area or park by using trees common to the development time period or typical of the area. The same theme can apply to streets through the use of historic trees progeny and species typically used in the landscapes of the development era. Trees should be labeled as to species so that passers' by are able to appreciate what they are seeing. A.16 5. Establish a Citizens Forestry Advisory Board. It is recommended that a Forestry Advisory Group be formed and that it function like the community centers' advisory boards. The board should examine issues relating to the forestry program and serve as a forum for citizen input regarding forestry issues. A.17 FOCUS GROUP: GOLF OPERATIONS (LANSING MUNICIPAL) FOCUS GROUP MEMBERS: Don Ballard, Chairperson, Golf Manager Susan Carrow, Golf Operations Supervisor John Johnson, Golf Maintenance Supervisor Jason Crocker, Asst. Operations Supervisor Stu White, President -Greater Lansing Amateur Golf Association Paul Nieratko, Vice -President, Greater Lansing Amateur Golf Association Richard Baker, Board Member- GLAGA Dave Panichi, Eastern High School Golf Coach Kris Nicholoff, Lansing Youth & Recreation Fund and Park Board Member MISSION STATEMENT- 5 YEAR PLAN After meeting, the group settled on three major aspects of the mission statement for the Golf Operation of the City of Lansing for the next 5 year plan. Those are listed below with specifics to attain and meet mission goals and objectives. Strive for accessibility, opportunity for competition, affordability and quality in all opportunities provided to Lansing residents & visitors. A. Customer Development 1. Develop pricing structure to encourage playing City courses. 2. Pricing and programs to bring new players to the game (i.e., continue and expand scholarship programs). 3. Explore any and all opportunities to develop a Golf Learning Center. 4. Develop tournament schedule for all playing abilities utilizing all courses. B. Facility Improvement- only by having quality facilities can we expect to maintain or increase customer levels. 1. Improvements to 9-hole facilities are mandatory to legitimize pricing structure (i.e., irrigation deficiencies exist at all 9 hole courses). 2. Groesbeck re -modeling completion is necessary to add balance to the course and maintain market for pricing that will be necessary in the future. 3. Search for highest and best use of each location (i.e., land use master plan for each course). 4. Identify locations for potential expansion of facilities (additional holes). 2. Promote community awareness of the value of golf courses to players and non -players alike. Awareness leads to involvements and support of the needs of the golf operation. A. Develop brochure of courses. A.18 B. Promote availability and take advantage of public speaking forums to define golf s role in community. 3. Explore & maximize the financial security and potential of the golf enterprise fund. A. Examine the existing equity funding program as it applies to the Golf Fund. B. Explore use of Park Millage for golf improvements. Golf Fund has reimbursed the General Fund hundreds of thousands of dollars for Parks Administration thru the Indirect Cost Plan yet received no funding from the Park Millage. The Golf Operations Committee met 3 times in formulating the action plan for the next five years. Each member of the group was contacted by phone as to meeting place and time. Listed below are the Committee members, phone contacts, meeting dates and meeting notes. Don Ballard, Committee Chair Sue Carrow, Golf Operations Supervisor John Johnson, Golf Maintenance Supervisor Jason Crocker, Asst. Operations Supervisor Stu White, GLAGA Dick Baker, GLAGA Paul Nieratko, GLAGA Dave Panici, Eastern High School Kris Nicholoff, Youth Recreation Fund Meetings: 483-4154 483-4232 483-4288 483-4153 241-1637 241-1637 337-2408 323-7591 346-9405 May 25, 1999 @ Foster Center @ 5:30 P.M. - Contacts made by phone to each person on May 20 to see if they were interested in being on committee. All attended meeting. Discussion centered around purpose of committee and basic format of ideas and future meeting times. 5:30 was determined to be a good time for all and Monday was the best day. Next meeting set for June 14, 1999. June 14, 1999 @ Foster Center @ 5:30 P.M. - Reminder calls to everyone made during the day on the 14'. All attended but Paul Nierato who was out of the country. Meeting centered around the general topics of the mission statement of the Golf Operation. Three general areas were agreed upon. Specific items within each category to be discussed at third and final meeting. Meeting date set for July 14 at the new clubhouse. July 14, 1999 @ Groesbeck Golf Course @ 4:30 P.M. - Reminder calls to everyone made morning of the 14th. Moving the meeting up to 4:30 worked better for all concerned. All attended meeting. Meeting specified the types of activities that would be necessary to accomplish mission statement objectives established at prior meeting. Committee was thanked for participation. Report to be compiled by committee chair. A.19 FOCUS GROUP: INFRASTRUCTURE (PARK & RECREATION SYSTEMI FOCUS GROUP MEMBERS: Phil Dorland, Chairperson, Deputy Director of Parks & Recreation R. Eric Reickel, Director of Parks & Recreation Tanya Moore, Landscape Architect Dick Schaefer, Landscape Architect Steve Widder, Manager of Grounds & Landscape Maintenance Paul Dykema, Manager of Forestry Murdock Jemerson, Manager of Leisure and Special Recreation Services Gerald Brady, Curator/Manager of Potter Park/Zoo Don Ballard, Manager of Municipal Golf Courses and the Washington Park Ice Rinks Bill Rieske, Planning John McComb, Principal Operations Analyst Bob Ford, President, Landscape Architects and Planners Susan Brownlee, Budget Analyst PRIORITIES: Promote and enhance the financial stability of the Lansing Parks and Recreation Department by generating funding through a variety of sources. 2. Maintain, assess, develop and preserve the park lands and facilities to provide for needs in the present and future. 3. Promote the development of new recreation programs with active sports facilities and passive/leisure opportunities which are in high demand, innovative, unique or not presently provided by other municipalities or private business. 4. Promote interaction, involvement, and communications between the Parks and Recreation Department, the citizens and surrounding communities. Promote Adopt -A -Park Program to increase the level of community involvement, maintenance, safety, and cleanliness in our park lands. 6. Upgrade current facilities to ADA standards. DISCUSSION: The purpose of the Infrastructure Focus Group is to look at the basic facilities, equipment, services and installations needed for the functioning and growth of the Parks and Recreation Department. Specific needs identified by the various Master Plan Focus Groups are compiled by the Infrastructure A.20 Focus Group, prioritized utilizing the city wide infrastructure priorities, and costed utilizing a planning range of numbers. Funding to implement the master plan has come from contributions, donations, grants, joint governmental agreements, land sales and the city's general fund. The dedicated one mill approved by the voters August 7, 1990 and again August 8, 1995 has provided many opportunities to implement recommendations made in the 1995-2000 Master Plan. One fiscal year remains on the current dedicated one mill. Collection is authorized for the budget year of July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001. A renewal recommendation should go on the ballot August 8, 2000. A.21 FOCUS GROUP: NATURAL AREAS FOCUS GROUP MEMBERS: Clara Bratton, Chairperson, Naturalist Friends of Fenner Advisory Board Fern Featherly Norris Ingells Carol Miller Joyce Messenger Marie Lewis Ron Eggleston Nan Wrisley It was felt that the last 5 year plan had not been implemented and most of what was in that draft should be included again in the current plan. Implement phase 2 of the master plan at Fenner. This would include developing a board walk and enhancing the plant He on the marsh trail, upgrading the youth group camp area and also acquiring additional nature center staff. Minimum recommended would be one full time naturalist and one half-time clerical person. 2. Fenner Nature Center boundaries need to be made secure with new fencing and plantings to visually buffer the park and visitors from surrounding development. Continue trying to get a physical connection between the River Trail system and Fenner Nature Center to facilitate visitor access. 4. Continue the association with the City Forestry section to maintain the parks and natural areas. Work to develop an annual plan to trim, plant native species and do trail surface maintenance in Fenner Nature Center. Some of this would be with the assistance of Field Services. 5. Develop a partnership with the Lansing School District and neighborhood groups to utilize the park lands adjacent to school sites as educational extensions and neighborhood recreation areas. As stated in the past plan, we must be attentive to the development plans, usage, supervision/ regulation (a safety issue) and possible programming/educational uses of the park land in the City of Lansing. We are fortunate and somewhat unique as a city to have the amount of open space we do within the city limits. We do not want new developments to degrade these spaces or jeopardize their character and value. These spaces are important to individuals, educational classes, scouts, senior citizens and neighborhood groups. A.22 FOCUS GROUP: NEIGHBORHOOD AND CITY WIDE PARKS FOCUS GROUP MEMBERS: Phil Dorland, Chairperson, Deputy Director of Parks and Recreation Tanya Moore, Landscape Architect Richard Schaefer, Landscape Architect Steve Widder, Manager of Grounds & Landscape Maintenance - Terry Becker, Parks Maintenance Worker James Nobach, Parks Maintenance Worker William Lemon, Parks Maintenance Worker James Dolega, Parks Worker/Gardener Eric Stinson, Parks Worker/Gardener Marsha Scott, Parks Maintenance Worker Larry Curtin, Grounds & Landscape Maintenance Supervisor PRIORITIES: 1. Due to the age of many city parks detailed site plans need to be brought up to date utilizing current computer technology. In the process of doing this the residents adjoining the parks need to be brought into the planning process to determine if the park and its amenities are meeting the needs of the neighborhoods. It appears that game areas such as youth baseball fields and tetherball courts in many of the neighborhood parks go unused. These facilities were installed thirty or more years ago when organized summer recreation programs were more prevalent in our parks. Passive and active leisure time needs taking place today need to be considered in the process of updating site plans. 2. More emphasis needs to be placed on day to day park maintenance and security. Maintenance today is usually provided by travel crews. During the grass growing months these crews move from park site to park site on a cycle of two weeks or more. Without daily maintenance trash, broken glass, playground surfacing material, etc. go untouched for extended periods of time. With current staff levels, park tree and shrub trimming go undone. Staffing levels need to be increased to address maintenance and security needs in addition to the creation of programs to have more residents and businesses adopt parks to assist with maintenance and beautification programs. 3. Many of the city parks are in need of renovation. Problems exist with restroom facilities, fences, broken concrete walks, leaking plumbing, playground equipment that does not meet current safety standards, sink holes, low tree branches, natural areas developed to reduce the mowing burden, basketball and tennis court wear areas, heaving concrete around goal posts etc. Since 1995, emphasis has been placed on installing new playground equipment through a program called "Project Play." Fifty-three park sites have had new playgrounds installed. In addition, the city has worked with the Lansing School District to install new equipment on fifteen of their sites. A.23 Twenty-two park sites are yet to be done. When the new playgrounds were installed, the old play units were not removed unless the equipment was broken and unsafe. An effort is now underway to remove the old equipment due to non-compliance with today's standards. During this removal process some residents are likely to want more playground equipment installed to replace those units being removed. 4. Promote the Adopt -A -Park Program to provide volunteer opportunities for neighborhood groups to increase the level of maintenance, safety and cleanliness in our park lands. 5. Develop a policy of naturalized areas in parks. Evaluate parklands which need to be de- naturalized or naturalized. DISCUSSION: People involved with this focus group inspected ninety-four (94) park sites that were not covered by one of the more specific site related focus groups. Tanya Moore developed an inventory sheet that was utilized for each inspection. Deficiencies were identified by staff and referred to the Infrastructure Focus Group for inclusion on the prioritization spread sheet. A number of minor repair and maintenance items were identified that could be taken care of in the near future by the maintenance staff. These items were referred back to the Manager of Grounds & Landscape Maintenance to schedule in the daily work routine. Also, a "Neighborhood Park Survey" was mailed to all neighborhood association presidents, published in the Lansing State Journal, and copies placed at each community center. The results of that survey are attached.. A.24 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SURVEY 37 respondents Compilation Date: 10-18-99 1. WHICH LANSING CITY PARKS DO YOU USE? #of #of responses responses ATTWOOD 1 McKINCH 1 BANCROFT 2 MOORES 4 BASSETT 1 119th 1 BECK 1 POTTER 10 BURCHARD 1 REASONER 1 CAVANAUGH 1 REUTTER 1 COMSTOCK 3 RIVERFRONT 6 COOLEY 1 RIVERPOINT 1 DAVIS 3 ST. JOSEPH 1 DIETRICH 1 SYCAMORE 1 DURANT 2 TECUMSEH 1 ELM 1 WALSH 1 EVERETT 1 WASHINGTON 4 FENNER 2 FOREST VIEW 1 GOLF COURS 1 FRANCES 19 GIER 3 RIVERTRAIL 4 GRAND RIVER 3 GRAND WOOD 2 GRAVES 1 HUNTER 3 LETTS 2 2. IN YOUR OPINION, WHAT ARE THE 3 MOST CRITICAL PROBLEMS W/ OUR NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS? 26% SECURITY / SAFETY Graffiti Doing much better w/ gangs, graffiti, and supervision Need more police surveliance not enough lighting noisy at times that they are unsafe - real & perceived under utilized - because of #21 drugs general crime safe parking vandalism obnoxious teenagers security, safety gangs older people hanging around 18% MAINTENANCE / GENERAL UPKEEP Trash, broken glass, needles (littering) upkeep of equipment upkeep, maintenance # of responses 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 ctanya\5yrplan\2000\survey.wk4 10/21/99 / 12:03 PM / Page 1 2. IN YOUR OPINION, WHAT ARE THE 3 MOST CRITICAL PROBLEMS W/ OUR NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS? (continued) 15% FACILITIES Lack of / not enough parking. ReSirooms, not available, not opened, unclean 13% PROGRAMMING Lack of year round programming. Lack of authorized supervision. Not enough activity for young adults. Need more children activities lack of structured programs (other that swimming) things to do 11 % NONE 10% ADMINISTRATIVE not enough parks & rec. staff no staff on site time they are open knowing where the parks are and their facilities lack of continuous funding for parks & programs willingness to make decisions about park usage, equip., etc. w/out consulting local residents. (i.e. removing play equip. w/out planning future replacements) lack of communication with other agencies with interests in the park, (i.e. Lansing School District) 7% EQUIPMENT Lack of equipment based on park use. not enough playground equipment no amenities new equipment 3. WHAT NEW FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR SUPPORT AMENITIES DO YOU SEE AS A NEED? IN WHICH PARKS? NONE GENERAL All parks larger than 2-3 acres should have restrooms, super- vision, regular maintenance, and hot & cold water. GENERAL Call me, Joseph Burton, 393-9262 GENERAL all parks need new equipment GENERAL accessible restrooms GENERAL drinking fountains GENERAL secure bike parking GENERAL bike access by road to all parks GENERAL storage space for permanent use of club GENERAL large club meeting space GENERAL continue updating the zoo and pools # of responses 3 8 1 3 2 E. 2 # of responses 8 ctanya\5yrplan\2000\survey.wk4 10/21/99 / 12:03 PM / Page 2 3. WHAT NEW FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR SUPPORT AMENITIES DO YOU SEE AS A NEED? IN WHICH PARKS? (continued) # of responses BURCHARD - E functioning restroom 1 BURCHARD - E water fountain 1 BURCHARD - E picnic tables 1 BURCHARD - W needs purpose, definition (i.e. fishing park) 1 COMSTOCK Bike racks 1 COMSTOCK Drinking fountains 1 COMSTOCK Picnic Tables 1 COMSTOCK (1) more basketball court 1 COMSTOCK Sand Volleyball court 1 COMSTOCK golf range 1 COMSTOCK pavilion utilized fully 1 COMSTOCK remodel building 1 DAMS improve restrooms 1 DIETRICH dog walk 1 DIETRICH restroom facility 1 DIETRICH outside water tap 1 DIETRICH picnic tables 1 DIETRICH canoe launch 1 DURANT add restrooms 1 D URANT drinking fountains 1 D URANT benches 1 D URANT fountain 1 ELM playground equipment 1 ELM another basketball hoop 1 FRANCES restrooms, need more 4 easily accessible w/ better lighting FRANCES playground equipment 1 FRANCES dringking fountains 1 FRANCES bike racks 2 FRANCES basketball nets 1 FRANCES more ice skating rinks (free) 1 FRANCES more basketball courts 1 GIER all bath stalls should be the size of the handicap because we 1 take our kids in there. HUNTER new sign at Holmes St. entrance by the 496 overpass (missing for 2 yrs now) 1 HUNTER more picnic tables 1 place throughout, near Kalamazoo entrance, secure tables in place HUNTER bike racks near pool 1 McKINCH playground equipment 1 McKINCH drinking fountain 1 McKINCH basketball nets 1 McKINCH picnic tables 1 ctanya\5yrplan\2000\survey.wk4 10/21/99 / 12:03 PM / Page 3 3. WHAT NEW FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT OR SUPPORT AMENITIES DO YOU SEE AS A NEED? IN WHICH PARKS? (continued) # of responses MOORES need more rides and toys for toddlers 1 MOORES restrooms - longer hours, cleaner 1 MOORES 2nd basketball court, full, near tennis courts 1 MOORES replacements of playground equipment 1 MOORES drinking fountain near baseball backstop 1 MOORES Community Garden - maintained in perpetuity, 1 more tangible offers of help. MOORES more signs informing of dog ordinances 1 MOORES keep pool open in evenings only until mid -Sept. 1 119th needs shade trees, especially near play equip. 1 119th a sidewalk from curb to equipment (for strollers) 1 119th more benches 1 119th an asphalt jogging trail around perimeter 1 119th nicely maintained portapotty w/ wash sink 1 119th need dog signs, ordinance, clean up after 1 119th designate (1) park as a dog run loose park 1 POTTER restrooms 2 RIVERFRONT drinking fountain 1 RIVERPOINT lighting 1 RIVERPOINT restrooms 1 RIVERTRAIL more lighting 1 ST. JOSEPH restrooms WASHINGTON restrooms 2 WASHINGTON drinking fountains 1 4. WHAT NEW PROGRAMS DO YOU THINK WE NEED ON OUR CITY PARKS? NONE # of responses 8 GENERAL activities for senior citizens 1 GENERAL rollerskating 1 GENERAL return of programs of 60's & 70's 1 GENERAL daycare 1 GENERAL cooking classes (i.e. how to BBQ) 1 GENERAL fire prevention 1 GENERAL meet police day 1 GENERAL meet fire day 1 GENERAL meet city council day 1 GENERAL all parks need hours enforced 1 GENERAL after school supervised programs for children 1 GENERAL tennis lessons, help increase use of courts 3 GENERAL ice skating 2 GENERAL soccer lessons (free) 1 GENERAL non-competitive softball 1 ctanya\5yrplan\2000\survey.wk4 10/21/99 / 12:03 PM / Page 4 4. WHAT NEW PROGRAMS DO YOU THINK WE NEED ON OUR CITY PARKS? (continued) GENERAL musical concerts "concert in the park" at Hunter - get surrounding neigh/org's to help promote GENERAL activities to increase usage GENERAL more nature type programming (children & adult) GENERAL on site security officers who make people obey the rules GENERAL those who judges have ordered to perform - comm. serv. could be used effectively in clean up programs, to keep our parks nice for law abiding citizens GENERAL reinstate "family swim" at Hunter Park Pool GENERAL something involving kids and their parents GENERAL sponsor programs there, to get people there GENERAL just more activities at all times for the people who have busy lives GENERAL more organized programs GENERAL any program that is in the best interest of the comm. GENERAL something for the kids. GENERAL "adopt -an -acre", so groups can take care of a particular section GENERAL summer programs at more of the parks & schools GENERAL glad to see the resurgnace of the summer play- grounds, but not much has changed in 26 yrs.- better publicity with more organized activities - don't want to send my kids to a park to "hang out" BURCHARD year round programming CAVANAUGH need everything FRANCES need more policing FRANCES more free activities kids programs HUNTER summer - crossing guards at main & busy inter- sections for start & end of programs. HUNTER recreation (perhaps by NYPPP) for 14-20 yr olds McKINCH security MOORES maintain current programs (assurance that the programs would be there each year instead of waiting until May to find out. WASHINGTON ok as is WASHINGTON organized games (i.e. chess, other board games) WASHINGTON crafts # of responses 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 ctanya\5yrplan\2000\survey.wk4 10/21/99 / 12:03 PM / Page 5 5. DO YOU FEEL SAFE IN A CITY PARK? // of responses 55% YES 20 but have members of their association who don't I do fee personally safe, and conduct myself accordingly. I can understand, however, someone older, and alone could be intimidated by fear. I do, but I don't think the park is safe. But usually on a bike 25% Daytime only (before 6 pm) 9 17% Not always 6 especially when there are loose dogs running around my kids Most residents have expressed that they do not feel safe in Hunter Park, although it has improved in the last 2 years. 3 % NO 1 6. WHAT ORGANIZATION ARE YOU REPRESENTING, WHAT IS YOUR NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBER? Entrepreneur Training Group Lansing Commundy Micro -Enterprise Fund Senior Citizen, Letts Small Business Center Tri-County Biking Association TGBA No name 717 W. Lenawee AJ Rib Experience 514-1/2 W. St. Joseph 487-6827 Artis, Ethel 3636 Coachlight 882-4760 Ballamy, Royce J. II 210 Abbott. Ste 7, 48823 333-3815 Studio 7 Bennett, Robert & Bonnie 907 Chicago Ave. 371-1750 Walnut Neigh. Org. Friends of Comstock Blake, Reynard Jr. 520 W. Ionia, 48933 485-4446 Lansing Comm. Microe Burton, Joseph No address 393-9262 Qualitean Consulting Fink, Glenn J. 1208 Bement St., 48912 487-0361 Hunter Park West Hodges, J. 887-0815 Koskinen, Kate 1409 Jerome, 48912 374-6180 Eastfield Neighborhood MadhavaRau, Leela (president) 1711 Bradley Ave.,48910 482-1456 Moores Park Neigh. Or Miller, Bilky-Duda 646-9892 P.L.A.C.E. 233 Allen, 48912 P.L.A.C.E. Rubio, Ri 325-6634 Shauver, Annette 512 S. Holmes St.,48912 485-6450 Stauffer, Jack 804 Vine St., 48912 Sparrow Estates Studio 7 210 Abbott. Ste 7, 48823 333-3815 Studio 7 Taylor, Willie A. PO Box 13141, 48901 485-5459 Mega Computer Solutio Wilson, Rudoph 1920 William St. 482-4567 WSNA Zimmerman, David (president) 1145 S. Grand, 48910 484-3283 (h) Riverpoint Neighborhoo 334-6977 (w) ctanya\5yrplan\2000\survey.wk4 10/21/99 / 12:03 PM / Page 6 FOCUS GROUP: NEIGHBORHOOD PARK PROGRAMS FOCUS GROUP MEMBERS: Murdock 7emerson, Chairperson, Manager of Leisure Services Debbie Balan, Community Centers Supervisor Mary Winegar, Special Recreation Supervisor Clara Bratton, Fenner Nature Center Supervisor Elizabeth Homer, Turner Dodge House Supervisor PRIORITIES: 1. As our urban environment continues to become more "risky", the Leisure Services Division must continue to design programs that promote developmental skills and provide personal satisfaction to the users. 2. The Leisure Services Division should continue to program activities designed to challenge young people which results in a positive impact on their self-esteem. 3. The Leisure Services Division should continue to recruit and hire people with skills and experiences to perform their various duties. Staff should also possess a desire to work with the public in a friendly manner. 4. Staff should continue to provide "customer -friendly" registration services. This can best be accomplished by staying on the "cutting edge" of computer technology when it comes to software for the parks and recreation industry. The Leisure Services Division should continue to be competitive in monitoring pay rates of its personnel classifications in comparison with other personnel classifications in other markets that are similar and act accordingly. 6. The Leisure Services Division should continue to monitor its existing fee structure and modify it according to current marketing trends and increasing programming and staffing cost. 7. The Leisure Services Division should continue to improve and distribute the Community Activities Guide to its participant. Suggested improvements include: Improve paper quality from newsprint to heavier bond paper. Increase corporate participation in distribution of Guide. Continue to personalize Guide with articles and pictures of coaches, volunteers, parents and local corporate sponsors. 8. Recommendations for improvements in the facilities varied, but here they are: Bigger gym at Foster Center for spectators. A_25 Water slides at Hunter and Moores. More parking at the following concert parks: Turner Dodge and Georgetown Restrooms at Georgetown Park for concerts. Make Moores Pool deeper and add diving board. Add diving board at Hunter Pool. Add more chairs on deck for parents with small kids. 9. The Leisure Service Division should continue to monitor its participation levels and when possible conduct surveys of those who decided not to return. 10., Recognizing the increasing number of non-resident participants in our programs, strategies should be formulated to further promote and when appropriate capitalize on this positive reaction to our program offerings. DISCUSSION: During the planning for the 1995 - 2000 Recreation Action Plan, a focus group structure involving citizens from the community met twice to discuss the future of neighborhood park programs. While this approach did provide some valuable feedback on overall programming efforts, we wanted to expand our review to include a more personal evaluation of the benefits derived from participating in our programs. Therefore, staff conducted a series of programming surveys. The surveys were issued and completed on site. Participants responded providing information on length of participation, satisfaction with staff, satisfaction with facilities, benefits derived as a result of participation and comments for future improvements. Programs included in the survey were Youth Floor Hockey, Camp Lansing Soccer Camp, Camp Lansing Basketball Camp, Camp Lansing Wrestling Camp, Drama Camp, Fenner Nature Camp, Turner Dodge History Camp, Open Swimming Program, Neighborhood Concerts In The Park Program, Community Centers Summer Program and Neighborhood Summer Kids Camp (Sample Size: 786 participants). The surveys were developed with the assistance of Dr. Betty van der Smissen and Dr. Richard Paulson, from the Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Resources at Michigan State University. For the most part all surveys were identical and only varied to capture information specific to the program area. Questioning focused in four areas: You and Your Child, Personal Benefits, Program Administration, and Overall Program. YOU AND YOUR CHILD In this section we were attempting to gather information as to who is using our programs. We asked the participant if they were Lansing residents, how many times they participated, and if they were challenged. We also asked questions for basic demographic information such as age and sex. While we felt it important to ask these questions for each specific program, we did not find it necessary to include a detailed discussion about those results in this document. Our program surveys were distributed to all age groups and sexes. Here is a brief review of the results and recommendations for the future for the items listed above. r:W Questions regarding residency: We asked this question to our concert, Turner Dodge and open swimming participants. These programs represent examples of a city-wide program with potential to draw beyond the corporate city limits, a speciality program and a neighborhood based program, respectively. Exactly 68% of those responding for the concerts and open swimming were residents. For the Turner Dodge summer programs the amount of residents compared to non-residents was 50%. Discussion: In the spring of 1997, the Leisure Services Division took the responsibility of programming the Lansing School District's pools and adult recreation. At the time of this change, we also eliminated the non-resident charges for youth programming with the exception of ice skating and tennis lessons. This was done to maintain a similar fee structure for youth programming as previously established by the Lansing School District. This was also done to remove any barrier that would restrict any young person from participating in our programs. Recommendation: Recognizing the increasing number of non-resident participants in our programs, strategies should be formulated to further promote and when appropriate capitalize on this positive reaction to our program offerings. Questions regarding participation: Depending upon the program, this question was asked in the form of days, weeks and years. For example, in the concert series we asked how many concerts did you attend this summer, for open swimming we asked how many days per week do you attend, for several programs (Fenner Nature Camp, summer playground programs, community center summer programs, floor hockey and speciality camps), we asked how many years have you attended our programs. 64% of the participants responding from the concert series responded that they have attended one to two years. 33% responded that they have attended three or more years. 3% responded as this being their first year. People attending our open swimming program indicated 34% swim at least once a week with the balance of participants coming 2 or more times per week. A little more than half (53.3%) of the participants in the Fenner Nature Center summer camp have attended the camp more than one year. For the summer playground program over 67% of the participants have attended more than two or more summers. Floor hockey received 75% of its respondents indicating two or more years of participation in this very popular program. Discussion: Overall, all programs surveyed received some level of repeat attendance. Repeat attendance can be viewed as a measure of program quality. The lack of repeat attendance in the speciality summer camps can be attributed to a participant's lack of interest in the activity, displeasure with the program or the participant received enough exposure to the activity and wanted to go to a higher level of competition or skill level. The speciality camps are entry or low skill level activities. Recommendation: The Leisure Service Division should continue to monitor its participation levels and when possible conduct surveys of those who decided not to return. Questions regarding challenging nature of activities: Parents were asked if their child felt challenged by the activity. This question appeared on program surveys for our summer playground program, A.27 speciality camps, Fenner Nature Camp and floor hockey. There were 96% of the parents responding that their child felt "very" or "somewhat" challenged by the activities offered during this summer drop -in recreation program. Our floor hockey parents also responded with 96% feeling that their child was challenged by the activity. 70% of those floor hockey parents also felt that their child had improved considerably as a result of having participated in this program. Similar results were found in the speciality camps. 83%'of the parents of the children attending Fenner Nature Camp were "very" or "somewhat" challenged. Discussion: How many times as a parent have you heard a child comment, "I'm 'bored." As professionals in the field of parks and recreation, we are held with the responsibility to present programs that will either challenge or pique the interest of children as well as adults. Presenting challenging programs helps youth build self-esteem. Recommendation: The Leisure Services Division should continue to program activities designed to challenge young people which results in a positive impact on their self-esteem. PERSONAL BENEFITS Parks and Recreation departments nationwide struggle to define and quantify the benefits one receives from participating in its activities. Researchers have attempted to present models for practitioners to use in the field to better capture recreation's impact on developmental assets such as self-esteem, sense of purpose, community service, values and social competencies. The National Parks and Recreation Association has published a book entitled, "Beyond "Fun and Games" - Emerging Roles of Public Recreation." This book reviews 19 parks and recreation programs that represent a "broad range of public programs, services, and resources which today bring new dimensions to recreation as a human service." It is important that the Leisure Services Division redefine itself as more than "fun and games." We asked our participants if they had fun, of course, but we also wanted to know if they made new friends (socialization), did they develop any teamwork skills, did their level of confidence increase, did their level of sportsmanship increase, and what impact did it make on their physical fitness. Here's a brief review of our findings. Questions regarding personal benefits: We surveyed personal benefits in most programs to varying degrees. Below is a table reviewing our results. Socialization Program Made New Friends Little Interaction No Interaction Summer Community Center Program 89% 11 % 0% Concert Series* 35% NA NA A.28 Summer Kids Camp** 93% 4% 00/0 Fenner Nature Camp*** 73% 20% 3% Youth Floor Hockey **** 87% 7% 1% Open Swimming ***** 68% 27% * Concert Series questionnaire listed only "socialization" as one of four different benefits. Approximately 59"/6 of the participants responded they attended concerts to listen to good music and to relax. The other 6% listed spending time with family only and other responses. Spending time with family was also listed with the top two responses. ** Summer Kids Camp had 3% no responses. *** Fenner Nature Camp had 4% no responses. **** Youth Floor Hockey had 5% no responses. *****Open Swimming questionnaire listed only three responses, Made Friends, Did Not Make Friends and Other. We had 5% listing other responses. Teamwork Program Improved Little Change No Change Summer Community Center Program* 44% 33% 0% Summer Kids Camp** 56% 33% 4% Fenner Nature Camp*** 47% 30% 0% Youth Floor Hockey**** 83% 13% 1% * Summer Community Center Program had 23% no responses. ** Summer Kids Camp had 7% no responses. *** Fenner Nature Camp had 23% no responses. ****Youth Floor Hockey had 3% no responses. Confidence Program Increased Some Positive Change Little Change No Change Summer Community Center Program 33% 56% 0% 11% Summer Kids Camp* 30% 41% 22% 0% Fenner Nature Camp** 37% 40% 3% 7% Youth Hockey*** 50% 41% 4% 00/0 * Summer Kids Camp had 7% no responses. ** Fenner Nature Camp had 13% no responses. ***Youth Floor Hockey had 5% no responses. A.29 S ortstnanshi Program Improved Little Change No Change Summer Community Center Program* 66% 11 % 11 % Summer Kids Camp** 44% 26% 22% Youth Floor Hockey*** 69% 26% . 2% *Summer Community Center Program had 12% no responses ** Summer Kids Camp had 8% no responses. - ***Youth Floor Hockey had 3% no responses. Phvsical Fitness Program Greatly Improved Improved Little Improvement No Improvement Summer Community Center Program 33% 33% 33% 00/0 Summer Kids Camp* 37% 37% 19% 00/0 Fenner Nature Camp** NA 1 NA NA NA Youth Hockey*** 50% 41% 4% 0% * Summer Kids Camp had 7% no responses. ** Fenner Nature Camp had only three responses in which 93% indicated they enjoyed walking outdoors and 7% said they enjoy being outdoors. 0% responded "Would rather see nature on the TV screen." ***Youth Floor Hockey had 5% no responses. Discussion: Other personal benefits were explored such as education and personal responsibility. Both Fenner Nature Camp and Turner Dodge House asked participants if they learned any new ideas from their experiences. In both cases a majority of participants responded positively that the experiences were educational. The summer community center program had 67% of their participants improving their personal responsibility for themselves. Recommendation: As our urban environment continues to become more "risky", the Leisure Services Division must continue to design programs that promote developmental skills and provide personal satisfaction to the users. PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION Program registration, capability of staff, program organization and program promotion were examined in this section. Questions regarding program registration: We had four programs include this question on their surveys. Below is a table of their responses: A.30 Program Registration Program Very Easy Time Consuming O.K. Poor Summer Playground Program 81% 4% 15% 00/0 Youth Floor Hockey* 65% 2% 28% 00/0 Fenner Nature Camp 90% 100/0 0% 0% 1 Turner Dodge History Camp** Excellent 58% Good 25% Average 4% Poor 40/6 * Youth Floor Hockey had 5% non -responding on this question. **Turner Dodge History Camp used a different scale with 91/o not responding to this question. Discussion: From the results above our registration process seems to be very functional. Over the past five years we have refined the process to include registration by mail, telephone, fax, as well as walk in's. We have even included an early registration period for residents. Recommendation: Staff should continue to provide "customer -friendly" registration services. This can best be accomplished by staying on the "cutting edge" of computer technology when it comes to software for the parks and recreation industry. Questions regarding staff capability: Several programs asked questions regarding the capability of the staff. As the table below depicts some responses were different, but for the majority of responses were favorable. Staff Capility Program Very Effective Effective Somewhat Effective Not Effective Youth Floor Hockey 56% 31% 10% 0% Community Center Summer Program 22% 78% 0% 0% Summer Playground Program 55% 41% 4% 0% Fenner Nature Camp Knowledgeable 76% Good Job 20% Fair Job 3% Lacking Info. 0% Turner Dodge History Camp Excellent 71% Good 21% Average 0% Poor 0% Open Swimming Nice 42% O.K. 56% Mean 0% Discussion: Staff training prior to programming, on the job and at the conclusion of a program in the form of evaluations are keys to having effective staff. Other factors to consider is a very aggressive summer staff recruitment program, thorough interviews and pay rates that will attract experienced and mature people. A final consideration that is also very important in this field is A.31 attitude. We are in the people business. The results above prove that we have staff that can relate to youth and adults in a very friendly way. Recommendation #1: The Leisure Services Division should continue to recruit and hire people with skills and experiences to perform their various duties. Staff should also possess a desire to work with the public in a friendly manner. Recommendation #2: The Leisure Services Division should continue to be competitive in monitoring pay rates of its personnel classifications in comparison with other personnel classifications in other markets that are similar and act accordingly. Questions regarding program promotion: We asked participants in the Fenner Nature Camp, Soccer Camp, Drama Camp, Wrestling Camp, Basketball Camp and the Turner Dodge History Camp how did they hear about the program. The results are below. Proaram Promotion Program Community Activity Guide School Flyer / Other Brochure Friends Newspaper Other Turner Dodge History Camp 33.5% 16.7% 4.2% 16% 25%* Fenner Nature Camp 40% 6.6% 40% 6.7% 6.7% Basketball Camp** 58% 26% 5% NA 5% Wrestling Camp 60% 20% 0% NA 20% Drama Camp 75% 00/0 12.5% NA 12.5% Soccer Camp 45% 45% 10% NA 00/0 * Turner Dodge History Camp also uses cultural arts publications to promote its programs. * Basketball Camp had 6% no responses. Discussion: The Community Activities Guide continues to be our best tool for program information to the public. This quarterly guide of our recreation classes and programs is mailed out to over 10,000 participants and placed in local schools, libraries, grocery stores and some financial institutions. Staff tries to improve each edition by personalizing it with stories about participants, pictures and quotes from coaches, volunteers, parents and local corporate sponsors. School flyers are still a very effective tool that we still use. Summer flyers are sent home with school children in the lower or elementary grades. Middle and high school students generally "toss" the flyers. Recommendation: The Leisure Services Division should continue to improve and distribute the Community Activities Guide to its participant. Suggested improvements include improve paper quality from newsprint to heavier bond paper, increase corporate participation in distribution of Guide and continue to personalize Guide with articles and pictures of coaches, volunteers, parents and local corporate sponsors. A.32 OVERALL PROGRAM In this section, participants were asked to rate facilities for some speciality camps, swimming pools, our concert sites and floor hockey. Some of the programs asked participants about fees and additional services. Here is a summation of those results. Pro am Facilities Program Ranking #1 Ranking #2 Ranking #3 Ranking #4 Swimming Pools - Pool Very Clean Clean Dirty No Response 44% 38% 100/0 8% Swimming Pools - Showers Very Clean Clean Dirty No Response 19% 46% 30% 5% Community Center Program Adequate Not Adequate 100% 0% Floor Hockey - Rink* Excellent Good Poor 33% 66% 1% Floor Hockey - Hockey Sticks Excellent Good Poor 17% 75% 8% Floor Hockey - Restrooms Very Clean Clean Dirty No Response 12% 71% 6% 11% Basketball Camp** Excellent Good O.K Poor 47% 42% 10% 1% Wrestling Camp*** Excellent Good O.K. Poor 0% 75% 25% 0% Drama Camp**** Excellent Good O.K. Poor ' 38% 50% 12% 0% Soccer Camp Excellent Good O.K. Poor 27% 68% 5% 00/0 Concert Series***** Best Park 2"d Best Park Worst Park 2"d Worst Park Frances - 33% Moores - 23% Georgetown Gier - 5% - 6% * Floor Hockey was played at Dwight Rich Middle School **Basketball Camp was played at Everett High School ***Wrestling Camp was held at Dwight Rich Middle School ****Drama Camp was held at Dwight Rich Middle School *****Over 75% of the participants did not rate the worst parks. Discussion: Overall facilities ratings were great. Recommendations for improvements in the facilities varied but here they are: A.33 Recommendations: Recommendations for improvements in the facilities varied but here they are: Bigger gym at Foster Center for spectators. Water slides at Hunter and Foster. More parking at the following concert parks: Turner Dodge and Georgetown Restrooms at Georgetown Park for concerts. Make Moores Pool deeper and add diving board. Add diving board at Hunter Pool. Add more chairs on deck for parents with small kids. Questions regarding fees and additional services: Participants were asked to rate the fees charged for a program. In some cases, participants were asked if they would like to have a longer program to cover for working parents. If they responded "yes", they were then asked how much would they be willing to pay for the extra services. Fees & Additional Services Programs Response #1 Response #2 Response #3 Response #4 Summer Playground Would you pay?- Would you pay? - No Response Program Yes -78% No - 11% 11% Summer Playground How Much - $5 How Much- S 10 How Much - $1 Multiple or No Program 15% 33% 30% Response - 22% Fenner Nature Camp Pre/Post Camp Pre/Post Camp Pre/Post Camp Great -17% Maybe - 20% No - 63% Fenner Nature Camp Rate Fee: Rate Fee: Rate Fee: No Response- 3% Inexpensive -47% O.K. - 33% Affordable -17% Turner Dodge History Low: 29% Average: 63% High: 8% Camp Discussion: The Summer Playground Program currently is free to any child. While there appears to be reason to believe that a charge would be accepted by the general public per this survey, it is doubtful a charge would be approved by the City Council. Historically, City Council has not been in favor of charging a fee for this type of programming or open swimming. The results show no interest for a full day program at Fenner Nature Center. The results also show general satisfaction with the existing fee structure. Similar results regarding the current fee structure is evident at Turner Dodge House History Camp. Recommendation: The Leisure Services Division should continue to monitor its existing fee structure and modify it according to current marketing trends and increasing programming and staffing cost. A.34 FOCUS GROUP: OAK PARK MAINTENANCE COMPLEX FOCUS GROUP MEMBERS: Phil Dorland, Chairperson, Deputy Director of Parks & Recreation Paul Dykema, Forestry Manager Tim Simon, Garage Supervisor Steve Widder, Manager of Grounds & Landscape Maintenance Marty Riel, Building Maintenance Supervisor PRIORITIES: 1. To alleviate the over crowding and congestion within the maintenance complex and to provide adequate space to reconfigure the maintenance complex, additional land needs to be purchased along the railroad tracks and eastward to Dorrance Street. 2. Plans, both conceptual and architectural, need to be developed to address office, garage, heated work spaces, cold storage areas, equipment storage, fueling yard, equipment parking, and employee parking needs. Funding sources need to be identified by the administration and advanced to City Council for a budgetary appropriation to obtain the additional land adjacent to the current site and to make improvements to the buildings and grounds. DISCUSSION: This site started to be developed as the Parks and Forestry Maintenance Complex in 1948. The current site is narrow. As additional building space was required over the years, the city kept adding on to the back of each building. Satellite maintenance sites have sprung up in other sections of the city to accommodate for the lack of space at this facility. The majority of the department's equipment fleet is exposed to weather conditions year around leading to more rapid deterioration of components and creating service delays. Staff office/restroom/break room conditions have deteriorated to an unacceptable level and are in desperate need of renovation. Restroom facilities are not adequate for the male to female ratio of employees and do not meet ADA requirements. The city has explored the concept of consolidating the City Central Garage on this site with the Parks Garage. The site, even with the addition of the land along the railroad tracks and Dorrance Street, was determined not to be of sufficient size to accomplish this in conjunction with field operations. A.3 5 FOCUS GROUP: POTTER PARK AND ZOO FOCUS GROUP MEMBERS: Gerald Brady, Chairperson, Potter Park/Zoo Manager R Eric Reickel, Director of Parks & Recreation Richard Schaefer, Landscape Architect, Parks & Recreation Carol Webster, Executive Director of Potter Park Zoological Society A new Potter Park Zoo Master Plan was done in July, 1995 by McFadzean Everly Associates, Zoological Planners; Capital Consultants, Engineers; and Marshburn, Bunkley, Architects. The new Master Plan is substantial, well done, and will take several years to complete. For these reasons, it was felt by the department that a formal zoo focus group was not required. The following are projects in priority order. Please see the new Potter Park Zoo Master Plan for developmental detail. POTTER PARK FIVE YEAR MASTER PLAN (03/01/2000 thru 02/28/2005) INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT LIST 1. Animal Care Facility 2. Renovation of Moated Exhibits and Sheep Island 3. New Signature Exhibit (i.e. polar bears) 4. Restoration of Roads & Pathways 5. Quarantine Facility 6. Fencing Repairs - several exhibits 7. Connect drain in Kangaroo Barn to main sewer system located outside in driveway 8. New Amphitheater 9. Hay Barn 10. Bird House - fix sewer gas problems 11. Renovation of outdoor Aviary 12. Upgrade graphic signs in zoo 13. Upgrade electrical (Bongo Barn, Big Barn, Pavilion#2, Rhino Bldg., Bird House) 14. Stripe parking lots 15. Cavy holding - renovate ceilings and walls 16. Bird House renovation 17. Bird House Sky lights (6-Building Maintenance) 18. Big Barn roof 19. Dumpster ramp and pad repair 20. Installation of heat mats and radiant heaters (Kangaroo barn, sm. barn, sm. moats) 21. Bongo Barn - bring plumbing to code 22. Pavilion #2 - reconstruct crib area 23. Pavilion #2 - Floor leaks into downstairs - repair A.36 24. Install drinking fountain in park 25. Post & cable installation 26. Trees to be trimmed 27. Stumps to be removed 28. Connect the Penn. Ave. East sidewalk to the river trail 29. Provide ADA accessible pathway by zoo office 30. Replace roof on Pavilion #3 31. Pave parking lot at Pavilion #1 32. Provide benches in park 33. Remove -walk along north bank of Red Cedar from Pennsylvania into park 34. Pave back service road 35. Renovation - Dakin Street Bridge A.37 FOCUS GROUP: REGIONAL RECREATION FOCUS GROUP MEMBERS: The following persons participated in the Regional Recreation Focus Group. The group assisted in developing five goals for the next five year plan. Two meetings were held regarding this effort. The first meeting was an input and brainstorming session held on August 26, 1999. The second meeting was for goal formulation, held on September 30, 1999.. The asterisks indicate that the person was absent from one or more meetings. Robert Ford, Chairperson, Landscape Architects and Planners Dick Benkert, Delta Township Parks & Recreation * Jamie Boyle, DeWitt Township Jon Coleman, Tri County Regional Planning Commission * James Crisp, East Lansing Recreation Arts * John Daher, Lansing Township Phil Dorland, Deputy Director, Lansing Parks & Recreation Mark Jenks, Delhi Township Parks & Recreation Wendy Longpre, Meridian Township Parks & Recreation LuAnn Maisner, City of DeWitt, Parks & Recreation Tim McCaffrey, East Lansing Parks & Recreation * Jeff Kacos, MSU Campus Parks and Planning (provided input on 8/19/99) John McComb, Principal Analyst, Lansing Finance Department * Robert Moore, Ingham County Parks Commission Tanya Moore, Registered Landscape Architect, Lansing Parks & Recreation R. Eric Reickel, Director, Lansing Parks & Recreation Bill Rieske, Lansing Planning & Neighborhood Development * Larry Sierra, Michigan State University * Rodney Stokes, State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources Peter Sullivan, LEPFA (Lansing Center) * Steve Tuma, Eaton County Park Commission Louis Twardzik, Michigan State University Parks & Recreation Dept. Carol Webster, Potter Park Zoological Society PRIORITIES: 1. Park Access: Public access to parks was considered to be the most important regional issue. The group recommended that efforts continue to be studied on how to economically provide better access to parks through the use of the automobile, bicycle, public transportation system, Capital Area Transient Authority (CATA) and other modes of transportation. In addition, the group recommended that attention be given to access for "special populations" such as disadvantaged, physically disabled, elderly and others. A.3 8 The group recommended that it designate a sub -focus group to meet on November 4, 1999 to begin the development of a regional map that will include the area's significant park facilities. The sub -committee chair was Bob Ford, as appointed by Phil Dorland, Deputy Director of Lansing Parks. Members who indicated a willingness to volunteer included: Richard Benkert, Delta Township, Mark Jenks, Della Township, Wendy Longpre, Meridian Township, LuAnn Maisner, DeWitt Township (Meridian Township November 1, 1999), Tim McCaffrey, East Lansing, Robert Moore, Ingham County Parks Commission, and Tanya Moore, Lansing. Efforts will include outlining the map area and facilities, funding for the map and distribution. 2. Regional Recreation Focus Group: Promote the continuation of a regional recreation focus group on a semi annual or annual basis. The focus group agreed to meet the last Thursday of September of each year. The next meeting will be September 28, 2000 at the offices of Landscape Architects and Planners, Inc. Bob Ford is responsible for notifying the group. 3. Tri County Trends: The Tri - County Regional Planning Commission should be supported in their efforts to study growth and a transit system for the region and provide recommendations relative to regional parks. The group agreed that the recreation directors should provide input into the planning effort. 4. Regional Park Authority: The concept of sharing regional facilities, programs, and events was recommended to be studied to see if a central authority might evolve. Some examples of the concept might include, but not limited to the following: A program or course, to train lifeguards and seasonal park personnel should be co- sponsored by various communities to teach the fundamental expectations of municipal employers and develop a seasonal workforce from which each municipality could draw pre -qualified seasonal workers. Promotion of regional recreation events could be provided in various forms with the cooperation from support groups within the region. The Regional Chamber of Commerce, State of Michigan Department of Tourism, or other private or public agencies could serve as allies to help support and promote regional recreation resources and activities. Such activities might include collaborative efforts between existing nature centers, historical programs, trail walks, or public causes of various types. Promote the collaboration between communities to coordinate efforts to preserve, enhance and utilize water -based resources (rivers, lakes and streams) throughout the region. 5. Study Regionalizing Potter Park Zoo: The group recommends the study of Regionalizing Potter Park Zoo. The issue has been discussed in the past, however, it was agreed that much more information is needed to assist the public and decision makers regarding this issue. A A.39 meeting was scheduled for 2:00 P.M., October 14, 1999, at Landscape Architects and Planners, Inc. offices to discuss the issue with Carol Webster, Executive Director of Potter Park Zoological Society and R. Eric Reickel, Director of Lansing Parks and Recreation. DISCUSSION: The Regional Recreation Focus Group realized that Southern Michigan Recreation and Parks Association, a subcommittee of the Michigan Recreation and Parks Association has been the clearinghouse and coordination point for most programming throughout the region. It also realized that there were other regional issues that did not have a forum to be expressed on a regular basis. Although regional cooperation does exist on an as -needed basis between impacted parties, the group began to take a broader view and expressed more interest on providing the forum to focus'on specific issues as mentioned above. It is thought that each community can realize benefits through cooperation and sharing resources. The following items were from discussion August 26, 1999. These items are not in priority order. 1. Delta Township is currently funding a study to recommend a trail and walk system throughout the township. 2. It was asked if Grand Woods Park could be connected into that trail system. It was stated that two river crossings would be necessary, but was possible. 3. It was suggested that more private funding, donations and corporate sponsorship be sought to assist in the development of parkland, events, and programs. 4. The City of East Lansing will soon provide a regional outdoor aquatic center in Abbott Park. Multiple pools, slides and related facilities will support 1,500 capacity. 5. A new soccer complex will soon be provided by the City of East Lansing with 7 fields, 2 of which will offer stadium seating. 6. A new soccer complex will soon be provided by the City of Lansing and Ingham County (Hope Soccer Complex) and will provide 6 fields with the ability to expand to 10 fields. 7. A new softball complex east of Abbott Road will soon be provided by the City of East Lansing offering 4 new fields. 8. There are currently 15 fast pitch softball teams within the district. Eight play in Webberville and seven in Eaton Rapids. 9. The cities of East Lansing and Lansing will be cooperating on a conceptual plan for Ranney Park, which lies within Lansing but borders East Lansing. One of the questions will be, what to do with Ranney Field and the parkland between Michigan and Ranney Field. 10. It was noted that slow pitch softball is declining in the region. 11. Soccer is continuing to gain popularity and the trend is likely to continue for the next 10 years or more. 12. It was mentioned that adult baseball is increasing in popularity. Lansing does not feel that it has enough fields to meet the demand. 13. It was noted that recreation is a tremendous economic resource to be promoted within the region. The Lansing Chamber of Commerce and the local providers should collaborate to promote all of the community's recreational assets. 14 It was suggested that a regional recreation map be produced to help advertise the A.40 recreational facilities within the region. 15. There are four nature centers within the area (Fenner, Meridian Twp., Woldumar, MSU). It would be advantageous to work together to promote quality onsite programs, outreach programs, and community education. 16. A lot of the support for Lansing Parks comes from outside the city limits. Many board members and volunteers are non-residents. 17. There are three historical centers within the region (MSU, Turner - Dodge, Meridian Twp.) It would be advantageous to work together to promote quality programs and events. 18. Gardens are represented throughout the area by: Frances, Cooley Gardens, MSU children's garden, MSU perennial and annual gardens and arboretum. It might be advantageous to explore the possibility of working together to sponsor various training or joint programs. 19. The region has traditionally been below recommended standards relative to water based recreation. It should be noted that MSU provides an outdoor and indoor public pools and Lansing provides two outdoor pools free of charge. Ingham County provides swimming at Lake Lansing and Burchfield Park. Most other swimming activities are provided through the schools. East Lansing's aquatic center and Ingham County's Hawk Island will help. come closer to meeting the recreational standards. 20. It is difficult to recruit and retain life guards. The communities might work together to provide training and assist one another to provide adequate supply. 21. Quality seasonal help in general is difficult to find and maintain. The communities might work together to develop similar training courses to provide an adequate supply. 22. Ice skating (indoor and outdoor) is provided at Lansing's Washington Park. The first ice dome was built here two years ago as a cooperative effort with GLAHA. Other private indoor rinks have developed (Summit and Apple Sportsplex). 23. SMRPA currently acts as the network clearing house for programming activities and appears to be coordinating the regional programs. 24. Access to community or regional parks is difficult for many people. It is suggested that transportation systems be studied to provide better access. Tri County is currently involved in a transit coordination study which may assist in this area. 25. Winter sledding is provided at Ingham County's Grand River Park, Meridian Township, Lansing's Waverly and Groesbeck Golf Course and Delhi's "Dead Man's Hill". Additional sledding opportunities should be considered. 26. Cross country skiing is provided in a number of parks. More might be considered. 27. Public Golf is provided through Lansing's system (Groesbeck, Red Cedar, Sycamore, and Waverly). No other public golf is anticipated. It was suggested that a youth golf training center be developed and more sponsors be recruited to encourage youth participation. 28. It should be noted that Lansing is converting a number of one way streets back to two way streets, which might impact access to parks. 29. Bicycle use is increasing on highways and trailways. In some areas of the downtown it is causing congestion and conflicts. The downtown area needs to be studied to redefine the trail width, design, and renovation standards needed for future use. It was also noted that the southern part of the county is experiencing significant increase in bicycle use. 30. It was noted that tax revenues due to "Proposition A" is increasing at a very modest rate of A.41 approximately 2%. This makes it difficult to expand or renovate recreational systems using general funds. 31. Lansing and Delta Townships have their own cemeteries. These facilities are difficult to operate within budget. Privatization or regionalism might provide answers to these problems. 32. Possible joint programs to "Clean the River" (i.e. Red Cedar / MSU). 33. Provide a more direct route from Harrison Ave. to Hagadorn via MSU (MSU study). A.42 FOCUS GROUPS: SCOTT ART & GARDEN FOCUS GROUPS MEMBERS: Diane Townsend, Chairperson, Administrative Specialist Judy Kish, Potter Park Zoological Society Patricia Harker, Lansing Art Guild Sam Pardee, Friends of Cooley Gardens Barb Wortman, Tri-County Iris Society Ruth Tanner, Lansing Camera Club Alice Atkin, Garden Club of Greater Lansing Kathy Sciranko, Capital City Riverfest Barbara Wheeler, Michigan Society of Herpetologists Jalene Talbott, Capital Area United Way Youth Board Bill Vernon, Lansing Council of Veterans Thomas Klunzinger, Lansing Coin Club RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Update electrical and plumbing services; due to age of house these are out-of-date and in disrepair. 2. Remove aluminum siding and restore the exterior, or repair aluminum siding. There is a problem with water leaking into the house, either due to the way the exterior siding was installed or for another reason which is not detectable on the surface. Replace front and back doors. Both the front and back doors are less than weather -tight (with the front door being in very bad condition). Install intercom from front door to offices on second floor so callers to the house can be announced. 3. Renovate interior of house. Ceiling tiles are discolored and the kitchen and small, main floor restroom needs remodeling. The basement needs additional lighting and a water source to provide additional work space for the clubs. The attic could be remodeled to provide additional meeting and/or office space. 4. Provide additional custodial services so the house can be appropriately maintained. DISCUSSION: The Scott Center is located on grounds containing historic gardens, including a sunken garden, which runs down to the river bank. The Scott Center house was moved to this site in 1976 as part of a land trade with Oldsmobile. Currently the building is used by eleven groups as a permanent meeting site. This is an increase of A.43 three groups over the past five years. Approximately nineteen meetings are held at the Scott Center involving 200 to 300 people each month. Two of those groups, Potter Park Zoological Society and Capital City Riverfest, have their offices located in the building. In addition, the house is used by various city departments for meetings and training. Although the Potter Park Zoological Society is expected to move into new offices in 2000, Scott Center continues to serve the needs of an ever increasing community non-profit organization population. Several of these requests have appeared in past 5 year master plans. During the past year, volunteer and City labor crews have worked together to spruce up Scott Center and grounds with painting and cleanup crews. Additionally, the Friends of Cooley Gardens is financing a part-time summer gardener position which also benefits Scott Center. A.44 FOCUS GROUP: WASHINGTON PARK ICE SKATING COMPLEX FOCUS GROUP MEMBERS: Don Ballard, Chairperson, Golf/Washington Ice Manager Sue Carrow, Golf Operations Supervisor Jason Crocker, Assistant Golf Operations Supervisor John Johnson, Golf Maintenance Supervisor The Washington Park Ice Skating Complex is located at 2700 South Washington Avenue and is the only artificially cooled ice skating facility owned by the City of Lansing. The facility consists of and outdoor artificially cooled ice rink that opened in 1976 and an indoor ice surface inside the air -inflated fabric dome that opened in 1996 as a cooperative venture with the Greater Lansing Amateur Hockey Association. Both rinks are serviced by the Warming House/Concession service building that was completely remodeled in 1997. The major considerations for this facility for the next 5 years are: 1. The future condition of the outdoor rink slab -being 23+ years old the probability of leaks in the cooling surface increases each year. It will be a major capital expenditure to repair this when the time comes. 2. How to compete in the greatly expanded ice skating facility market that has developed in recent times. We must search for our niche in the market and continue to provide reasonably priced skating services for Lansing residents. 3. Reach out to area schools to use the dome during the school day for development of future customers. In the absence of weather conducive for natural ice rinks throughout the city the Washington Park Complex will be the only access to ice skating many of the area children will have. 4. Scholarship and grant programs to make skating affordable to all Lansing residents should be developed. 5. The Greater Lansing Amateur Hockey Association and the city must work to provide opportunity for Lansing youth to participate in their program and promote the facility they built in conjunction with the City of Lansing. 6. Year round use of the facility should be explored if it could be financially advantageous. The interest in in -line hockey could be looked at as an alternative summer use of the building and outdoor rink. Much has been done with the rinks and their operation over the past 2 years so this was a recording by staff of mission statement related information expressed over the past 2 years. A.45 CORRESPONDENCE C-7 fricnd8 of DUQANT PAD-K,InC. Mailing Addr esa 726 Seymour Avenue Lansing. MI 48906 Phone (517) 485-4225 January 27, 2000 Lansing City Council Members 124 W. Michigan Avenue Lansing, MI 48933 Dear Council Members, r rr1 • • - The Friends of Durant Park, Inc. have reviewed the Parks and Recreation Department 5-Year Master Plan and generally support the plan, although more information on the parts that affect Durant Park may be needed. If our understanding is correct, the long over due infrastructure repairs to the sidewalks in Durant Park, the urgent restoration repairs needed on the Durant Park Memorial Arch, and a comprehensive landscape plan, are projects that can only be completed if the 5-year millage renewal passes. We urge the Council to approve the Master Plan and encourage citizens to renew the 5-year millage request in August that is dedicated to park improvements. This may also be the time to increase the Parks & Recreation Department grounds keeping budget for Durant, Ferris and Reutter parks. Our research has found that when an inner city park is improved, the changes are immediately noticeable and more and more cities are beginning to pay attention to how these kind of improvements can trigger revitalization efforts beyond the parks. Durant Park forever! Sincerely, Joan Sheldon, President Friends of Durant Park, Inc. DUPAW DAP.K -A kwdy equme dannated by a deamuve arch at the southeast oorncr or Ww m6tcn and 6apair vac once the homemte or Manner Cowke pumhaaed by Willem C Dment. who p vchiced the Dmnnl and 6wr eutoe heir in Uinwi8 alter his aaaooeUon vdh Gcncml Motors ended Dment gave the part to the City of le =e 8 in 1911 B.1 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR 9th Floor, City Han 124 West Michigan Avenue Lansing, Michigan 48933-1694 (517) 4W 4141 (Voice) (517) 483-4479 (TDD) (517) 483-6066 (FAX) David C. Hollister, Mayor October 20, 1999 Suzanne Elms -Barclay G 1628 Lindbergh Drive Lansing, MI 48910 Dear Ms. Elms -Barclay: Immediately upon receiving your letter, I investigated your complaint. You were absolutely right, and I sincerely apologize as the Mayor of this City for the deplorable condition of the facilities that you have been provided. I informed the Director of Parks and Recreation, Eric Reickel, that I will not tolerate such a facility, and I expect that before the beginning of the spring programs these restrooms will be presentable to the citizens of the City of Lansing. — want to sincerely thank you for bringing this deplorable condition to my attention. I would look forward to hearing from you if you have any other suggestions. I do wish to reinforce to you that my number one priority is being the Mayor of Lansing. I will continue to see that the programs and facilities we offer provide the proper amenities to welcome not only our citizens but our guests. Sincerely, David C. Hollister Mayor cc: R. Eric Reickel, Parks & Recreation Director Liza Estlund Olson, Management Services Director B.2 "Equal Opportunity Employer" CITY of LANSING INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: The meeting Monday, Oct and Tony Nc and clarified David C. Hollister, Mayor R. Eric'Reickel, Director of Parks and October :19 , 1999 WOMEN'S;BASEBALL, e Lansing Women's BaseDE r Com, Munity Center with" IV ng was very'constructive!.as tandings that existed were c The biggest concem'expressed is that the only baseball diamon&thaVWe of is $high maintenance standards as cowth' baseball'diamonds�tF dt`the teams play on (Everett:and Eastern) <Wh-96im to set our stand' rds higher at the school district facilities and gefitheir, pe improve those fieldssa would hope this could be with a cooperative effort school district -cannot afford it, I would recommend we use,Citpresources the ball diamonds _Ih`that case, the City would have to have complete -co diamonds once the High school baseball season is over andinto the'fall . can ha e o e co ` frol over the ro ra s we are offerin Mary Alrick ust-do is `sion to t if the ..,of those .way we v m r n p g m The other issue that came through loud and clear is that we definifely: need,�a second lighted ballfield. You are aware we are working on this. The second lighted ballfield will be included in the capital improvement program for FY 2001. I hope that the Lansing School District is still interested in a joint venture there. I am -sure some of that will be left up to the new district administration. The last thing that must improve is the umpire assignments. The women feel they are not getting umpires that are as good as the umpires the men are getting. We informed them we are in the process of working with an umpire association and that the association will assign their games. It will by the association's responsibility to ensure the umpires are assigned equally among all the baseball leagues. I will make point to attend the managers' meeting this winter to be sure they are aware of the progress we have made in the areas of their concern. cc: Murdock Jemerson Tony Noyola Mary Alrick B.3 CITY of INTEROFF1 E LA.NSING COMMUNICATION FROM: DATE: David C. Hollister, Mayor R. Eric Reickel, Director of Parks and. July 30, 1999 SUBJECT: .,.JUNIOR. GOLF;GO URSE agree with Mr Cassady petairnng to his interest in junior golf: Don' Ballard, Golf Manager, and (think t47, 0 <!unior, golf course is a,great idea, _but�we,:continually have a problem withtis0chlan a mitt'' We do not fiave a facility that' is designated.to teach the ,�4 p, ryr v i a game. We$ !� ea°ddr�5seda0i"osue. in ou"fTWe Year Plan as �one`�of the..major goals of the golf oRer�,a ids , One of thesmajor components to a good teaching, operation is a driving range but we have never.;beeri,able to -provide one. We do provide some junior::iristruction at Waverly but,nof,toAhe measure that this concepf.that Mr. Cassady enclosed meets. When we we�re2exploring the possibility of selling. Waverly several'years -ago and Fine Park was .akaltOrr ptive for a new nine -hole golf:course, we did design a facility that would have -addressed theissue of instruction. We feel it is veryimportant in order to promote our youth in -the City of Lansing. There are two.courses that we, could dedicate to youth golf. One. is Red Cedar which is also very popular. with -seniors and I fear that taking that course away from seniors in any way, shape orform would be trouble. Sycamore is the logical choice with some modifications for a program, but the drainage problems there are well documented. The potential for a season that would provide a consistent opportunity is quite slim. We look for ways to continue to serve our youth population. We have provided scholarships this year through GLAGA as well as have a discount coupon for the kids. I noticed the other day that Sycamore is very popular with the youth when it is playable. I know that Alfreda's grandson, Billy Schmidt, who is a very good golfer and is advancing through the competition ranks as I write this memo, learned his golf at Sycamore. His grandmother used to buy him a pass.. He would be at the course all day long playing and that is what we need more of here in Lansing. We will continue to explore this concept as well as to continue to try to advance youth golf in the City of Lansing. Don and I would be more than happy to continue to discuss this with you further at your convenience. cc: Don Ballard, Golf Manager B.4 March 3, 1998 R. Eric Reickel, Director Parks and Recreation, City of Lansing City Hall, 124 W. Michigan Ave. Lansing, MI 48933 Dear Mr. Reickel: RECEIVED BY t PARKS & RECREATION r LL MAR 0 9 1998 LANSING SCHOOL DISTRICT Committed to Quality I request that the City of Lansing's Parks and Recreation Master Plan (1995-00) be amended to include the Lansing School District. The District's major contribution to recreation and environ- mental education opportunities in Lansing is the Ebersole Environmental Education and Conference Center in Wayland, Michigan. . For more than 20 years, the Ebersole Center has been an environmental education camp, retreat and meeting center for students and adults from Lansing and surrounding areas. During the 1996-97 school year, the Ebersole Center hosted 3,700 students and 1,100 adults. Of these, 50% were from within the city of Lansing and another 15% were from areas surrounding Lansing. The Ebersole Center wishes to cooperate with the City of Lansing to better serve the people of Lansing. With funds from the Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund and local match, the Ebersole Center hopes to acquire natural areas bordering the property (including rare fen wetlands), develop interpretive access to these areas, and further develop Ebersole's infrastructure to better meet the recreation and environmental education needs of our visitors. Please contact John Schimmel (325-6345) or Hugh Crowell (325-6348) at your earliest convenience to discuss the amendment. Thank you. Sincerely, / Richard J. Halik, Ph.D. Superintendent of Schools c: John Schimmel, Director of Food Service and the Ebersole Center Hugh Crowell, Site Coordinator of the Ebersole Center Richard J. Halik, Ph.D. Superintendent of Schools 519 W. Kalamazoo St. Lansing, Michigan 48933 An Equal Opportunity District B.5 APPENDIX C PUBLIC MEETING NOTICES, AGENDAS & MINUTES I, DEBORAH K. MINER, DEPUTY CITY CLERK of the City of Lansing, Michigan, do hereby certify that I have compared the annexed copy of Resolution #074, Approving the Parks and Recreation Master Plan for 2000-2005, Approved by the City Council of the City of Lansing at their regular meeting held on February 14, 2000, with the original now on file in my office, and that it is a correct copy thereof, and of the whole of such original. SEAL IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate seal of the City of Lansing this 15th Day of February, A.D. 2000 DEBORAH K. MINER, DEPUTY CITY CLERK From the desk of... Debbie Miner Deputy City Clerk City of Lansing 124 W. Michigan Ave. Lansing, MI 48933 (517)483-4131 Fax: (517) 483-6066 LANSING CITY COUNCIL LEGISLATIVE ITEMS; FEBRUARY 14, 2000.RES G.1 RESOLUTION #074 BY THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING WHEREAS, in order to be eligible to receive grant funds from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) a five (5) year recreation plan, meeting their plan content criteria, has to be on file with the MDNR; and WHEREAS, the Park Board reviewed the Parks and Recreation Draft Master Plan 2000- 2005, held a public meeting for input and at its meeting on December 15,1999 moved that the draft plan with their corrections be forwarded to the Mayor; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board, at its meeting on January 25, 200b, voted unanimously (6-G} to endorse the Parks and Recreation Draft Master Plan 2000-2005, and to forward its comments to the Parks and Recreation Department; and WHEREAS, the Mayor forwarded the Draft Master Plan to the City Council to hold a public hearing as required by the MDNR; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on January 31, 2000 to receive comment by the citizens of Lansing; and WHEREAS, the City Council Committee of the Whole has reviewed the Draft Master Plan; and WHEREAS, during the life of this plan, plan amendments can be made by the City Council following a public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council authorizes the Parks and Recreation Department to make the necessary final modifications to the draft plan before submission to the MDNR. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves the Parks and Recreation Master Plan and capital improvements schedule for grants. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Parks and Recreation Department is to forward the Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2000-2005 to the MDNR for review and approval. By Councilmember Allen To accept a friendly amendment proposed by President Murphy to delete the language in paragraph #3, "(6-0)", detailing the vote of the Parks Board, and to place an affirmative roll on the resolution as amended Carried Unanimously LANSING CITY COUNCIL LEGISLATIVE ITEMS; FEBRUARY 14, 2000.RES C. - Ia.. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 318 N. Capitol Avenue Lansing, Michigan 48933-1206 (517) 483-4277 (Voice) (517) 483-4479 (TDD) (517) 483-6062 (FAX) February 15, 2000 Jon Coleman Tri-County Regional Planning 913 W. Holmes Rd. Suite 201 Lansing, MI 48910 RE: FIVE YEAR PARKS & RECREATION MASTER PLAN CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN Dear Mr. Coleman: Enclosed you will find the final copy of the Five Year Parks and Recreation Master Plan as submitted by Mayor Hollister to the Department of Natural Resources on February 15, 2000. This copy is for your file. If you have any questions please feel free to contact Tanya Moore at, 483-4282. Thank you. Sincerely, , Director 6.110 "Equal Opportunity Employer" a REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 10TH FLOOR LANSING CITY HALL 124 W. MICHIGAN AVENUE AGENDA FOR FEBRUARY 14, 2000 TO THE HON. MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. The following items were listed on the agenda in the City Clerk's Office by 4:00 P.M. on Thursday, February 10, 2000 in accordance with Section 3-103(2) of the City Charter and will be ready for your consideration at the regular meeting of the City Council on Monday, February 14, 2000 at 7:00 P.M. at the Council Chambers, 10th Floor, City Hall. ROLL CALL INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Ill. READING AND APPROVAL OF PRINTED COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS Approval of the Printed Council Proceedings of February 7, 2000 IV. CONSIDERATION OF LATE ITEMS (Motion to suspend Council Rule # 11 to allow consideration of late items, (which are to be considered as part of the regular portion of the meeting to which they relate) V. TABLED ITEMS If any, (Tabled Items are to be Considered as Part of the Regular Portion of the Meeting to Which They Relate) VI. SPECIAL CEREMONIES AND ANNOUNCEMENTS OF CITY EVENTS (From Councilmembers, Mayor or City Clerk) A. Musical Presentation by Ms. Platte's 5th Grade Class from Lewton Elementary School VII. PUBLIC AND MAYOR COMMENT ON LEGISLATIVE MATTERS A. Public Hearings (Public May Comment for Three Minutes: Color of Registration Sheet for Speaking is White) 1. In consideration of an Amendment to Chapter Five, Section 5.58 of the Traffic Code for the Purpose of Limiting the Definition of the Term "Unattended" C.2 2. SLU-13-99; 1200 Block Jerome St., Special Land Use Petition filed by Sparrow Hospital to allow for the Development of a Parking Lot in the "C" Residential District B. Legislative Matters (Including Resolutions, Ordinances for Introduction and Ordinances for Passage - Public May Comment for Five Minutes: Color of Registration Sheet for Speaking is Pink) VI I I. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATIVE MATTERS A. CONSENT MATTERS FOR ACTION _ B. RESOLUTIONS FOR ACTION 1. BY COUNCILMEMBER LARRY MEYER Setting a Public Hearing for March 6, 2000.in Consideration of SLU- 15-99; 100-200 Block of E. Jolly Rd. (South Side), Petition for Special Land Use to allow for Construction of a Church in the "F" Commercial and "G-2" Wholesale Districts 2. BY THE COMMITTEE ON GENERAL SERVICES a. Appointment of Monica Martinez to the Human Relations and Community Services Board for an At -Large Term To Expire June 30, 2004 b. Transfer of Class C Liquor License and Dance Permit to Gamekeepers C. Claim Settlement; Marie Blackwell for Property Located at 0 Aurelius Rd. d. Claim Approval; Bobby D. Husband for Property Located at 713 W. Saginaw e. Claim Denial; Hamid Khorrami for Property Located at 304 S. Mifflin f. Claim Settlement; Michael Larkins for Property Located at 232 S. Foster 3. BY THE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY Appointment of Carlos C. Barajas to the Fire Board for an At -Large Term To Expire June 30, 2004 4. BY THE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICE C.3 a. Public Improvement II; Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd. Reconstruction, Special Assessment Roll #356 b. Public Improvement I; Sidewalk Repair in an Area Bounded by, Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd., Cavanaugh Rd., Stabler St., Graham Ave., Stafford Ave., and Jolly Rd. C. Public Improvement II; Leawood Dr. Reconstruction, Special Assessment Roll #353 d. Public Improvement II; Curb and Gutter and Storm Sewer on Heald Place between Hosmer St. and Lamed St., Special Assessment Roll #354 5. BY THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE a. Parks and Recreation Master Plan for 2000-2005 b. Grant Application and Acceptance; Michigan Abstinence Partnership C. Transfer of Funds; Clean Cities Program d. Amending Council Rules 16, 17, 19 and 46 C. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION and Setting of Public Hearings 1. BY COUNCILMEMBER JOAN BAUER a. Amending Chapter 630 by Adding a New Section, 630.15, for the Purpose of Providing for the Seizure and Abatement as a Public Nuisance of Vehicles Used or Intended to be Used for Lew Conduct, Assignation, Solicitation or Prostitution, and Establishing a Procedure for Redemption of Such Vehicles, and Setting a Public Hearing for February 28, 2000 b. Amending Chapter 1424, Sections 1424.01, 03, 10, 13 and 14 for the purpose of Permitting the Administration and Enforcement of the State Approved Michigan State Electrical Code by the City Within It's Jurisdictional Boundaries and to Make Reference to the Board of Appeals as the Construction Board of Appeals, Electrical Division, and Setting a Public Hearing for February 28, 2000 D. ORDINANCES FOR PASSAGE IX. OTHER CITY -RELATED BUSINESS (Public may comment for up to three minutes -color C.4 AGENDA Committee of the Whole Thursday, February 10, 2000 - 1:30 p.m. Tenth Floor Conference Room City Hall Council President Michael C. Murphy Council Vice President Sandy Allen 1. Call To Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes 4. Public Comment 5. Discussion/Action: A. Census 2000 Update B. Parks and Recreation Master Plan C. Clean Cities Intern Grant D. Consideration of Ad for Boys and Girls Club 6. Other 7. Adjourn Page 1 of 1 C . 5 MINUTES Committee of the Whole Thursday, January 20, 2000 — 1:30 p.m. Tenth Floor Conference Room City Hall Call To Order Councilmember Murphy called the meeting to order at 1:33 p.m. Roll Call Council President Michael Murphy Council Vice President Sandy Allen Councilmember Louis Adado — excused absence Councilmember Tony Benavides Councilmember Harold Leeman Councilmember Larry Meyer — excused absence Councilmember Michael Murphy Councilmember Carol Wood Others Present Phil Dorland, Parks and Recreation Department Tanya Moore, Parks and Recreation Department Jack Jorday, Law Department David Wiener, Mayor's Office Jon Colema, Tri-County Regional Planning Commission Ron Wilson, Council Staff Tina Gallante, Council Staff Page 1 of 5 C.6 DRAFT Approval of Minutes COUNCILMEMBER WOOD MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 6, 2000, MEETING AS SUBMITTED. MOTION CARRIED 6-0. Public Comment on Agenda Items No public comment was given- DISCUSSION/ACTION Five Year Parks Master Plan Mr. Dorland introduced Tanya Moore from the Parks and Recreation Department who spearheaded the Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2000-2005. Ms. Moore pointed out the purpose of the presentation was to familiarize the Council before the public hearing, scheduled for January 31, 2000. There were 20 committees set up to assist in the recommendations of the master plan. A site checklist was also developed which covered assessment of every park in the City. The draft was presented to the Park Board twice, with their final recommendations being made in December. The Planning Board will be making their final review of it next week. She first started off by reviewing the Table of Contents, where sections A, B & C will only be included in the draft. The focus of this plan was due to the deteriorating parks system that is showing its age. Through the checklist and site visits, numerous problems were cited. This plan has a purpose for grants and justifies the projects being recommended. There was $16.8 million budgeted over 10 years and the grants were $10.4 million. Secondly, she pointed out the DNR checklist whereby it is laid out as to what the City must comply with. She then referred to the master project lists, which was developed due to the assessment and are projects more than $1,500.00. The department is requesting final adoption by mid February, as it must be adopted by the State in mid March. Councilmember Benavides indicated 96 felt it was important to find out what each specific ward would be getting. He requested, specifically for the third ward, what it is they will be getting. This needs to be a tool he could use when speaking to his constituency. He also wanted to ensure that there was a process that could be utilized in case portions of the plan needed to be amended. Page 2 of 5 DRAFT Mr. Dorland responded, yes, the plan can be amended, but would have to be done in conjunction with the State. Councilmember Wood expressed her concern over Genesee Park and the fact it is not dedicated parkland. The Committee reviewed the time frame for passage. Councilmember Bauer wanted to ensure the current park system was maintained and updated before any new projects are considered. She would rather see fewer projects and place emphasis on the maintenance of existing parks. Council President Murphy requested the listing of dedicated parkland. He also pointed out that a portion of the Council's resolution was to have a vigorous assessment of the acquisition and disposal of park property. Councilmember Leeman reported he supports the parks system and feels they have done an excellent job over the past 10 years. Councilmember Wood made Le distinction between what was and w not dedicated A parkland. l ^t ui l 3 lesol i re P ep, 1n &7 44S' It was suggested to refer this plan to the Internal Audit department to develop standards and suggestions on the maintenance and development of new projects and this entire Master Plan. Also to develop a break down of parks projects for each specific ward. To be referred back to Committee of the Whole after the public hearing. Homecare Options for Michigan's Elders The Committee reviewed the resolution, which calls for increased funding by the State for in -home services for seniors. COUNCILMEMBER ALLEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE STATE IMPLEMENTATION OF A PLAN TO PROVIDE INCREASED FUNDING TO SUPPORT HOMECARE OPTIONS FOR MICHIGAN'S ELDERS. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Michigan Municipal League News Conference COUNCILMEMBER ALLEN MOVED TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE BALLOT ISSUE THAT WOULD LIMIT STATE INTERVENTION IN LOCAL GOVERNANCE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Page 3 of 5 C .8 DRAFT 01• a6-0o Council Photos Scheduled for Monday, January 24, 2000, at 4:30 p.m. Committee Reports Organizational. Councilmember Bauer, Committee on -Public Safety, indicated that the Committee would meet on Wednesdays at 4:00 p.m. The time for the Committee was set in consideration of citizens being able to attend. The Committee will sponsor a seminar regarding Housing in the future. Councilmember Benavides, Committee on Public Services, reviewed the • Public Improvement I item that would be voted on Monday at the Council Meeting. He reported that there would be a public hearing scheduled to amend the Ordinance for the NPDES permits with respect to mandating downspouts being placed above the ground. He reported that the Committee would be meeting on Wednesdays at 3:00 p.m. Councilmember Benavides also reported that the Committee on General Services would be meeting on Wednesdays at 1:00 p.m. Receipt of Travis Averill v Charter Township of Meridian and City of Lansing Received and placed on file. Tri-County Planning Commission — Update on Regional Growth Project Mr. Coleman made a presentation on regional growth, land use and other growth trends on the region and to formulate consensus on the future. He pointed out that local towns, cities, and municipalities need to start working together to avoid urban sprawl. Staff is to provide John Coleman with a copy of the Housing Market Study & Central Lansing Comprehensive Study from Development and Planning. Councilmember Bauer suggested looking into reasons that so many people remark about the growth and positive aspects of Grand Rapids and study there development. Page 4 of 5 C9 DRAFT . oi.as.W Regional Cooperation is a major topic for the Mayor and supports the continued cooperation that has been developed throughout the region. - ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 3:53 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Tina M. Gallante Administrative Secretary Lansing City Council Approved by the Committee on Appropriate documents attached to original set of minutes. Page 5 of 5 C•10 GRAFT 01- ab'. 00 JANUARY 31, 2000 COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS 25 to acknowledge that the Community is safer today than it has been for 25 years. Councilmember Benavides thanked Chief Johnson for everything that has been done. The improvement in response time and in other efforts by the Police Department have been very timely. He congratulated Chief Johnson on the assignment of the new Captains for the North and South Side Police Precincts. He is confident that Steve Luciano and Mark Alley will perform their duties very well. Both of them are young and energetic and have their fingers on the pulse of the community. We are fortunate to have young men wiling to lead our new recruits. You can already see the type of commitment that they have. They are showing a strong force that will be even stronger in years to come. When Chief Johnson first talked about his deployment plan in June of'98, everyone was sort of waiting to see if He would take the City in the right direction. He commended Chief Johnson on the results of his improvements to the Police Force. Chief Johnson said that anytime you make changes of the magnitude that they made in 1998, there will be concern. They recognized the need to reassign people to the streets and let everything else follow from there. Councilmember Wood thanked Chief Johnson for making sure that neighborhoods got credit for their role in reducing crime rates. As a neighborhood activist, she is aware of the importance of giving credit where it is due. PUBLIC'S AND MAYOR'S COMMENT ON LEGISLATIVE MATTERS Public Comment on Scheduled Public Hearings: 1. In consideration of the City of Lansing Parks and Recreation Five Year Master Plan and Capital Improvement Project Schedule Joan Sheldon of 726 Seymour stated her support for the five year master plan. Especially for the improvements to Durant Park. This property was the gift of Mr. Durant the founder of General Motors, who produced the Durant and Star Cars in the City of Lansing. Her Neighborhood Association takes care of the Park and keep it clean. They keep flowers planted and weeds out. The City needs to dedicate more money to maintenance of Park Grounds. They need more professional flower planting and grooming of grounds. Downtown Parks need to be upgraded. They should be a showcase for the City of Lansing. She urged Councilmembers to increase staffing and funding to improve downtown parks. Ed Carpenter of 119 S. Larch congratulated Mayor Hollister on the General Motors announcement this morning that Lansing will be a Cadillac town. He stated his support for the five year master plan, particularly for the Turner Dodge House and the River Trail behind it. This is an important park for the future of Lansing. Lloyd Teets of 116 E. Elm St. asked Mayor Hollister who invented the Cadillac? It was Henry Ford. So in reality, maybe we should call Lansing a Ford Town. He stated his support for the five year master plan. Parks are important to the quality of life in any city. You cannot have too many parks. Anytime that he has an opportunity to drive out W. Saginaw St. he enjoys the beauty of the sight of the Waverly Golf Course which is a haven of greenspace in a area that is a commercial jungle. Parks aver very important, and Council should support this master plan. Lansing has one of the best parks systems in the State of Michigan, even in the Country. Beverly Miller of 413 Pearl St. said that the Parks and Recreation Department used to provide neighborhood associations with summations of their Master Plan, but this year they have to pay to get a copy. This plan should be free to neighborhood organizations. At least a synopsis of it should be available for free. She did not see anything in the plan about a play area for North Lansing. Also, she wants the bathrooms that are located along the river trail fixed and maintained so that they can be opened to the public. Right now they are closed and they are not taken care of. People who use the trail now do not have anywhere they can go to use a bathroom. Public Comment on Legislative Matters: Christine Timmon of 335 E. St. Joseph said that She wants Council to know that the respect that they ask for from the public is a two-way street.. Voters elect Councilmembers and they want to be respected too. She stated her disappointment that the chairs in the lobby area of City Council Offices have been removed. She stated that she hopes that Council does not use the revisions to rule 19 to violate the public's right to free speech. Slander is something that must be proved in court. She hopes Council will not use the revised rules to pass onerous ordinances. Rather, they should listen to the public more closely, _ especially on the landlord/tenant issue. _ Eugene Buckley of N. Fairfield said that He also has a concern with the revision to Council Rule #19. The old rule is inclusive enough. You cannot prevent people from making comments about elected officials. He asked who decides what is contrary to the normal conduct of business? This whole ordinance is constitutionally unenforceable. It is too vague and has no clear definition. Who decides what is personally abusive and what is not? This needs a more clear definition of what is permitted and what is not permitted. It needs to have the understanding that questioning of the office of elected officials is always appropriate. LEGISLATIVE MATTERS RESOLUTIONS ...................................... #if$C�l<#J�1s:3N#Q24 BY THE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING WHEREAS, the Mayor has appointed William Krejcik, 2861 W. Jolly Road, Okemos, to the Board of Mechanical Construction Examiners as an representative, and WHEREAS, the Committee on Public Safety concurred with the appointment of William Krejcik on January 26, 2000; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thatthe Lansing City Council hereby concurs with the appointment of William Krejcik to the Board of Mechanical Construction Examiners as an representative for a term to expire June 30, 2003. By Councilmember Wood Carried Unanimously .................................... #7�5C7�J141V:>.#025. NOTICE OF INTENT TO ISSUE BONDS FOR PUBLIC SERVICE DEPARTMENT COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW PROJECT City of Lansing Counties of Ingham and Eaton, Michigan WHEREAS, the State of Michigan Water Resources Commission has issued a Wastewater Treatment Facilities National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit No. MI 0023400 (the "NPDES Permit") requiring the City of Lansing (the "City") to construct certain Combined Sewer Overflow Control Improvements; and WHEREAS, Act 320, Public Acts of Michigan, 1927, as amended, repealed and recodified by Part 43 of Act 451, Public Acts of Michigan, 1994, as amended ("Act 451") enables a City to issue and sell bonds to finance construction of improvements required by a permit issued by the State of Michigan Water Resources Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City intends to authorize the issuance of Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds pursuant to Act 451 in one or more series at an estimated interest rate of 2.5% and in an aggregate amount not to exceed $12,000,000 for the purpose of REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 10TH FLOOR LANSING CITY HALL 124 W. MICHIGAN AVENUE AGENDA FOR JANUARY 31, 2000 TO THE HON. MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL: The following items were listed on the agenda in the City Clerk's Office by 4:00 P.M. on Thursday, January 27, 2000 in accordance with Section 3-103(2) of the City Charter and will be ready for your consideration at the regular meeting of the City Council on Monday, January 31, 2000 at 7:00 P.M. at the Council Chambers, 10th Floor, City Hall. ROLL CALL II. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: III. READING AND APPROVAL OF PRINTED COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS Approval for the Printed Council Proceedings of January 24, 2000 IV. CONSIDERATION OF LATE ITEMS (Motion to suspend Council Rule # 11 to allow consideration of late items, (which are to be considered as part of the regular portion of the meeting to which they relate) V. TABLED ITEMS ' If any, (Tabled Items are to be Considered as Part of the Regular Portion of the Meeting to Which They Relate) VI. SPECIAL CEREMONIES AND ANNOUNCEMENTS OF CITY EVENTS (From Councilmembers, Mayor or City Clerk) A. Presentation re: Sparrow Hospital VII. PUBLIC AND MAYOR COMMENT ON LEGISLATIVE MATTERS A. Public Hearings (Public May Comment for Three Minutes: Color of Registration Sheet for Speaking is White) 1. In consideration of the City of Lansing Parks and Recreation Five Year Master Plan and Capital Improvement Project Schedule C.12 4D a Thursday, January 13, 2000 • Lansing State Journal NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PARKS AND RECREATION FIVE YEAR MASTER PLAN The City Council of the City of Lansing will hold a Public Hearing on Monday, January 31, 2000 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, 10th Floor, Lansing City Hall, 124 W. Michigan Ave., Lan- sing, MI 48933, for the purpose of consid- ering the Parks and Recreation Five -Year Master Plan and Capital Improvement Project Schedule of the City of Lansing. Persons interested in this Public Hearing are encouraged to attend and to present their comments. Written comments will be accepted providing that they are received prior to 5:00 p.m. on Monday, January 31, 2000 at the offices of the Lan- sing City Council, 10th Floor, Lansing City Hall, 124 W. Michigan Ave., Lan- sing, MI 48933. Marilynn Slade, City Clerk 1-28 C•13 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES JANUARY 25, 2000 PAGE 4 Church in "G-2" Wholesale District. The Committee voted to adopt the staff recommendation for approval of the special land use with three conditions as above. Ms. Keene made a motion, seconded by Mr. Frederick, based on testimony, evidence, and the staff report, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part thereof, to recommend approval of SLU-15-99, Vacant Land 100-200 Blk. East Jolly Road (South Side), Church in "G-2" Wholesale District subject to three conditions as above. PLANNING BOARD ACTION on the motion was as follows. Frederick .................... Ave Nischan ..................... Ave Smith.. . Aye Miller ................ . Ave Patrick ...................... Aye Keene ....................... Ave On a Roll Call vote, there were: Ayes: 6; Nays: 0; carried unanimously; SLU-15-99, Vacant Land 100-200 Blk. East Jolly Road (South Side), Church in "G-2" Wholesale District with conditions as above was APPROVED. 2. Zoning and Ordinance Committee - Mr. Miller, Chair. Next meeting is Wednesday, February 9, 2000, at 4 p.m. in the Department Conference Room, 316 N. Capitol Avenue. Mr. Ruff noted that at the February 1, 2000, Planning Board meeting, a new rezoning case will have a public hearing. It will then be before the Zoning and Ordinance Committee on February 9, as will some information on the tabled rezoning for Z-15-99, the Holiday Inn South development, and also MPA-1-99, and Act-21-99 in a coordinated presentation. Mr. Frederick as a point of information said that the Board of Zoning Appeals also has before it an appeal on the Holiday Inn project. It too is tabled. 3. Urban Development Committee - Mr. Smith, Chair. The Urban Development Committee met on January 18, 2000, and considered four items. a. Parks and Recreation Draft Master Plan 2000-2005. The Urban Development Committee met on January 18, 2000, and wanted time to consider and comment further. The Committee met earlier tonight to reconsider the draft and the comments. The intent is stated as fulfilling the requirements to have the Plan on file with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources to apply for MDOT grants, to identify capital improvement projects and to assist various C. 14 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES JANUARY 25, 2000 PAGE 5 boards, the mayor and members of Council in developing budgetary and operational policies. The Plan includes descriptions of the Lansing community, the administrative structure, the planning process, followed by a recreation inventory and an action plan. During discussion about the funding sources covered by this plan, it was noted by Ms. Patrick that the Michigan Consumers and Industry Services Department has funding available to local governments for renewable energy improvements which could be used in park facilities and that also could be used to expand the concepts of what Parks and Recreation could legitimately cover.- Discussion ensued regarding the process of receiving public input. Most of that came about from stakeholder focus groups. The plan was favorably received. Staff recommends endorsement of the Parks and Recreation Draft Master Plan, and also recommends that Planning Office staff forward the Board's suggestions for the final document to the Parks and Recreation Department. In Committee, it was moved, seconded and carried unanimously 3-0 to recommend endorsement of the Parks and Recreation Draft Master Plan, with the understanding that comments of the Urban Development Committee, Planning Board or Planning Office staff would be included with the endorsement of the Plan and transmitted to the Parks and Recreation Department. Mr. Smith made a motion, seconded by Ms. Keene, to approve Parks and Recreation Draft Master Plan 2000-2005, with the understanding that comments of the Urban Development Committee, Planning Board or Planning Office staff would be included with the endorsement of the Plan and transmitted to the Parks and Recreation Department PLANNING BOARD ACTION on the motion was as follows. Mr. Frederick noted that the Board's desire to have River Trail access to Cooley Gardens is in the Plan. Miller.. . Aye Patrick . . Ave Smith.. . Aye Frederick . . Ave Keene.. .Aye Nischan . .Ave On a Roll Call Vote, there were: Ayes: 6; Nays: 0; unanimous; carried; Parks and Recreation Draft Master Plan 2000-2005 was recommended to be ENDORSED. c.15 Regular Meeting LANSING PLANNING BOARD 7 p.m., Tenth Floor City Council Chambers, Lansing City Hall Tuesday, January 25, 2000 AGENDA 1. OPENING SESSION in City Council Chambers at 7 p.m. A. Roll Call B. Excused Absences C. Introductions 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. COMMUNICATIONS A. 4. HEARINGS 5. COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE (5 minutes each) 6. RECESS - The Urban Development Committee will hold a short meeting during the recess. 7. BUSINESS SESSION A. Minutes for Approval: January 11, 2000 B. Committee Reports 1. Committee of the Whole a. SLU-15-99, Vacant Land 100-200 Blk. East Jolly Road (South Side), Church in "G-2" Wholesale District 2. Zoning and Ordinance Committee Next meeting Wednesday, February 9, 2000, at 4 p.m., 316 N. Capitol Avenue, Department Conference Room. 3. Urban Development Committee a. Parks and Recreation Draft Master Plan 2000 - 2005. b. Proposed Objectives, Goals and Projected Use of Community Development Fund Resources, including the Community Development Block Grant, HOME, and Emergency Shelter Programs, FY 2000-2001. Next meeting Tuesday, February 8, 2000, at 4 p.m., 316 N. Capitol Avenue, Department Conference Room. 4. Executive Committee C. Report from Planning Manager C.16 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA JANUARY 25, 2000 Page 2 D. Pending Items: Future action required 1. Zonina and Ordinance Committee a. Z-19-97, N.W. Cor. Cavanaugh & Aurelius, 'F' Commercial to 'G-2' Wholesale District (Tabled October 15, 1997) b. Z-1-98, 1223 N. Turner St., "H" Light Industrial District to 'G-1' Business District (Tabled February 11, 1998) C. Z-4-98, 201 E. Grand River, "F-1" Commercial & 'H" Light Industrial Districts to "G-1' Business District (Tabled June 10, 1998) d. Z-5-98, 401-407 E. Grand River, "F".Commercial District to "G-1' Business District (Tabled June 10, 1998) e. Z-15-99, Portions of 6820 S. Cedar St., from'F' Commercial District to 'J" Parking District and from 'J' Parking District to 'F' Commercial District, Also 915, 927 & 1000 Just A Mere Ave., 6931, 6937 & 7001 Georgia Ave. from 'A' Residential District to 'J' Parking District, Also 1115, 1121, 1201, 1209, 1215, 1227 & 1301 E. Willoughby Rd. from 'A" Residential District to OF" Commercial District (fabled January 11, 2000) 2. Urban Development Committee a. Act-24-98, Everett Lane at Paris .St., Vacate ROW (Tabled February 16, 1999) b. Act-7-99, Somercroft Drive at Post Oak Lane, Vacate Public Right-of-way for School Parking (Referred to UDC May 18, 1999) c Act-14-99, 100 Blk. West Elm Street, Sale of Property d. Act-15-99, 703 East Shiawassee Street, Purchase of Property for Parks Department Oak Park Field Office (Re -referred to Committee November 2, 1999) e. MPA-1 -99, Master Plan Amendment to the Southeast Area Comprehensive Plan (Tabled January 18, 2000) f. Act-21-99, 1000 block of Just A Mere Ave., Pedestrian Overpass (Tabled January 18, 2000) 9. NEW BUSINESS 10. COMMENTS FROM CHAIRPERSON 11. COMMENTS FROM BOARD MEMBERS 12. BOARD MEMBER CODE ENFORCEMENT NOTIFICATION REPORTS 13. ADJOURNMENT FOR SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS, PLEASE GIVE NOTICE 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING BY CALLING LOUISE H. CHRISTIAN AT 4834066 OR 4834088 TDD. 3 1252000AG.2JAN C. 17 RECEIVED BY PARKS & RECREATION JpN 2 q00 D0EPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT 316 N. CAPITOL AVENUE - LANSING, MI 48933-1236 - (517) 483-4066 - FAX: (517) 483-6036 PLANNING OFFICE Memorandum TO: R. Eric Reickel, Director Parks and Recreation Department m, FROM: William C. Rieske, Principal Planne DATE: January 26, 2000 RE: Parks & Recreation Draft Master Plan 2000-2005 - Planning Board Comments The Lansing Planning Board, at its meeting on January 25, 2000, voted unanimously (6-0) to endorse the Parks and Recreation Draft Master Plan 2000 - 2005, and to forward its comments to the Parks and Recreation Department. The Board's approved comments are reflected in the following documents (attached): • The minutes to the December 7, 1999 presentation of the Parks and Recreation Draft Master Plan to the Board; • Parks and Recreation Draft Master Plan 2000-2005 - Comments from Planning Office Staff; • The Urban Development Committee Report dated January 18, 2000, and revised January 25, 2000; and • Comments on the Proposed Parks and Recreation Department Master Plan, by Michael Smith, Planning Board Member. Please incorporate these comments into the official record for the proposed Parks and Recreation Master Plan, and make the appropriate adjustments in the final document. Please contact me at extension 4091 if you have any questions or need additional information. CC. Phil Dorland ✓`fanya Moore Eleanor Love ® Please Recycle "Equal Opportunity Employer" C.18 Urban Development Committee Report Page 2 Tuesday, January 18, 2000 a. Parks and Recreation Draft Master Plan 2000 - 2005. Bill Rieske and Donna Wynant presented the case. They presented a draft memo with both general and specific comments related to the contents of the plan, and the Committeereviewedmany of the items included in the draft. The intent of this plan as stated on page 'a' is to fulfill the requirement to have it on file with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources to apply for grants that the MDNR administers; to identify capital improvement projects; and to assist various boards, the Mayor and Council in developing budgetary and operational policies. The plan includes descriptions of the Lansing community, the administrative structure, and the planning process, followed by a recreation inventory and an action plan. In a discussion about the funding sources covered by this plan, Ms. Patrick noted that the Michigan Consumers and Industry Services Department has funding available to local governments for renewable energy improvements, which could be used in parks facilities. A discussion also ensued regarding the process of receiving public input. The process relied heavily on stakeholder focus groups. The advantages of this method are that it involves perhaps the most knowledgeable and representative people in an efficient means of data collection, dialogue, and prioritization. The disadvantages include the restriction of new ideas and the exclusion of many parks customers (e.g. youth), community organizations and volunteer resources. In a discussion about the action plan, Mr. Smith noted that pets, particularly dogs, run unleashed in some parks. In Scotts Woods, for example, unleashed dogs roam through beds of flowers, some of which are state -protected (e.g. trillium). A policy and enforcement mechanism is needed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends endorsement of the Parks and Recreation Draft Master Plan, and that Planning Office staff forward the Board's suggestions for the final document to the Parks and Recreation Department. COMMITTEE ACTION It was moved by Ms. Winfrey -Keene, seconded by Ms. Patrick, to table this item until the Planning Board meeting recess on January 25, 2000. On a voice vote, the motion carried unanimously (3-0). C.19 Comments on the proposed Parks and Recreation Department Master Plan by Michael Smith - Planning Board Member 1) In the comments from the Director it is noted that "the lack of revenue to maintain and continue to renovate an aging system was a primary concern." Yet on page 5.10 several properties are listed as desirable for acquisition. Perhaps, in light the impending millage vote, for which approval is not a certainty, and in consideration of the unreliability of grant funding for programs and services it would be wiser for the Department to focus on innovative and practical ways to finance and maintain what it already has. 2) Although the River Trail is an excellent recreational resource it can also use as an optional means of commuting to and from work — by bicycle, roller blades or by walking. In that regard it should be considered coequal with the building and maintenance of streets and sidewalks and likewise be available for comparable funding. 3) It has been noted that the impending August 2000 vote on Parks and Recreation funding may directly compete with a vote for funding the Capital District Library. Perhaps a public relations campaign to the effect of "Enjoy a book in the Park" could help promote the value of both Parks and Libraries in the public mind. 4) In seeking grant funding for Parks and Recreation programs, operations and services a wider net should be cast. Funding from the National Endowment for the Arts, or the Humanities Council etc. may be just as viable as looking to the DNR. 5) When seeking grants it would be best if these were not sought for purposes of on -going maintenance and operation of the Parks and Recreation system. This is so because grants and matching fund systems are unpredictable. It is unfair to offer the public something one day only to snatch it away the next because the grant was not renewed. 6) On page 2.5 under the subhead "Disposal' it states, "the object of any such sale or transfer should be for the purpose of improving the Park System and not be for the benefit of private development or interest." Clearly this should be the case. However can the disposal of park property be done primarily to strengthen the Parks and Recreation Departments financial position? . 7) Would the Parks and Recreation Department be more efficient and effective maintaining just a few large parks, in key regions of the city, rather than many small parks scattered about the city? This issue is not addressed in the report. 8) Would the Parks and Recreation Department be better off transferring much of the responsibility for Leisure and Special Recreations to other private and non-profit groups? In light of the budgetary limits the department needs to make a stronger case for maintaining control of many of these programs and operations. 9) Why is the city even in the business of running golf courses? If golf courses why not a Kayak course on the Grand? Or drag strips for teens to race their cars. This smacks of promoting a life-style. 10) Control of dogs in city parks is absolutely essential. So-called "dog parks" in which dogs may be run unleashed sound fair but this idea is flawed. Dogs are pack animals and see their owners as members of their pack. So when a dog encounters a dog from another, park a fight is likely. Similarly dogs often run well ahead of their owner. When encountering another person or dog an attack may occur because no owner is present to prevent it. C.20 Comments on the proposed Parks and Recreation Department Master Plan by Michael Smith - Planning Board Member Also if dogs run freely in the parks how will state and federally protected wildflowers, such as Bloodroot and Trillium be protected? Scotts Woods is a good example. Both species of flower grow there and I have often seen humans and dogs trample them. C.21 CITY of LANSING INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION Memorandum TO: Planning Board FROM: William C ; Rieske, principal, P„farm s`t4{ FZn v-.f ga.Y 't ds j _ , � ��`ti1 ,DATE: Janus 202000� y +� L� y .t r'8'iy�.r'�s,m`s'•,�fi�.,�.�,y.X"r„t Y � tK�r��d RE:47 Parks &Recreation"D"aft Master PI'an 200( F �A "hett ' gg +' • t + ..��.�.? �`��.;� ��-+.+ Ell y.i Pt fi?'• fL�'' �� �3Cw +� rr"' X Planning Office staff has reviewed the Parks and Recreation Draft Ma Attached is"a listmg�of theycomments based�on this review4�, •Sq..M.kty",�. ro'L • � tze �S Yl� � �..� ..,,p �` p-�' ';..l�.,iji •y2b �y�.('�+lx`�w. '�"�'y These commei"Ri re intended to provide•Vfdmework for=Planriin4 Bc plan. The Parks`arid Recreation Departmerit,requests tr endorse thissubmit its comments toCifyCoun JanuaryCouncil will hold a public hearing on thiskplan}i, t 3 �q r f $*•� °*•" ky�' �, iY. ..k.sk� u"w.�r,�,':i, q `" � r 1. 2>,�`'..�-}}i•y-tr^.- .' •„'tw.. ..'��I iq;Y'-';r"e.ri'ryY£s Yet YYYY ; � y 9F ��•.. .st 3`. .'m'C'p'gM°. .t t the `. 31 2000. i ,. Y•'�'rJ1..1 n 1 av, is r'' f 9 s ,ps v 9 C•22, Urban Development Committee Report 3:30 p.m. Tuesday, January 18, 2000 Planning and Neighborhood Development Department Conference Room 316 North Capitol Avenue Members Present: Deborah Winfrey -Keene Jan Patrick - Michael Smith Members Absent: John Ruge (excused) Staff Present: Bill Rieske, Principal Planner Doris Witherspoon, Senior Planner Donna- Wynant, Senior Planner Others Present: Emil Winnicker, Development Manager Chairperson Smith opened the meeting at 3:30 p.m., and adjourned it at 5:15 p.m. AGENDA a. Parks and Recreation Draft Master Plan 2000 - 2005. Committee Action: Tabled until the Planning Board meeting recess, January 25, 2000. b. Proposed Objectives, Goals and Projected Use of Community Development Fund Resources, including the Community Development Block Grant, HOME, and Emergency Shelter Programs, FY 2000-2001. Committee Action: Recommended for Approval. C. Discussion of MPA-1-99, Amendment to the Southeast Area Comprehensive Plan. Committee Action: Tabled January 18, 2000. d. Discussion of Act-21-99, 1000 Block Just -A -Mere Ave., Pedestrian Overpass. Committee Action: Tabled January 18, 2000. Pending: a. Act-24-98, Everett Lane at Paris Ave., Vacate Everett Lane ROW. (Tabled February 16, 1999.) b. Act-7-99 Somercroft Drive at Post Oak Lane, Vacate ROW for School Parking. (Referred to UDC May 18, 1999.) C. Act-14-99, 100 Blk W Elm St, Sale of property. (Tabled October 26, 1999.) d. Act-15-99, 703 E. Shiawassee, Purchase of property for Parks Department Oak Park Field Office. (Tabled October 26, 1999.) C.23 Parks & Recreation Draft Master Plan 2000 - 2005 Comments from Planning Office Staff Quality of life is greatly enhanced in our community with the many things that our parks have to offer. It is what makes Lansing more of a "World Class City" and distinguishes it from others. Lansing's parks and recreation programs are a big reason (other than employment) why nonresidents come into Lansing. The intent of this Plan as stated on Page 'a' is to fulfill the requirement to have it on file with the Michigan Department of Natural. Resources to apply for grants that the MDNR administers; to identify capital improvement projects; and to assist various boards, the Mayor and Council in developing budgetary and operational policies. The draft of the Parks & Recreation Master Plan: 2000 - 2005 is quite comprehensive. The following comments and suggestions are intended to strengthen this document and to reinforce the Parks and Recreation Department's efforts to make continuous improvements to its planning process. SPECIFIC COMMENTS (identified as to page number): Table of Contents - the Table should be more specific to make the document more usable, perhaps by including subheadings. 1.3 "No other bodies of water exist within Lansing...' Though Bear Lake is held by MSU, it is a significant body of water in Lansing. It is mentioned in the Southeast Comprehensive Plan. Suggestion: Include Bear Lake on Page 1.3 1.4 Paulson Park - Suggestion: Consult the Paulson connector street study. 2.6 River & Waterfront Development Board: This Board has not met for 6-7 years. Suggested change: The Waterfront Development Board was created by City Council Ordinance to oversee implementation of the waterfront plan. This Board has been inactive in recent years. It should be revitalized, or other arrangements should be made to ensure that the purpose of this Board is fulfilled. 2.7 Suggestion: Add the Historic District Commission and the Historical Society of Greater Lansing as groups that are advisory (even though they may have not been in the past) to the Parks and Recreation Department. 3.6 Regional Park Map - Joint efforts between/among communities within the Lansing region will go a long way to share in the resources (natural and people resources) that all communities have to offer. 3.7 Suggestion: Historic Preservation should be given greater emphasis to structures and places other than the Scott House and Turner Dodge House. The Lansing Historic District Commission and the Historical Society of Greater Lansing could be consulted on this and should be included in the list of organizations consulted on pp. 2.6-2.8. C . 24 Planning Office Review of Page 2 Parks and Recreation Draft Master Plan 2000-2005 January 20, 2000 4.3 Some of the maps are difficult to read. 4.18 Suggestion: Correct the map re: Tumer-Dodge and Impression 5. 4.19 Pro -Bowl - 2122 North MLK. - - 4.26 Suggestion: Consider the deletion of adult entertainment uses which are not oriented to health & fitness or museums. 4.27 Suggestion: Include Lansing Community College's performing arts program. 4.27 Suggestion: Include Tollgate Wetlands, east of Groesbeck, in Lansing Township. 5.5 Suggestion: Mention Oldsmobile Park as a recreational resource to the City of Lansing, and emphasize that it is an accessible park/stadium. 5.6 Suggestion - revise "A" to read: "To develop partnerships/coalitions with community groups, educational institutions, and churches." The discussion should be expanded to include the need for the involvement of volunteers, particularly children. The creative use of volunteers is absolutely the wave of the future! 5.10 Downtown Business District - The Central Lansing Comprehensive Plan supports the linkage of attractions and open space, as well as the installation of a continuous riverwalk on both sides of the river, and if feasible, pedestrian/bicycle bridges. The feasibility of these bridges has yet to be determined. The Parks and Recreation Plan should include feasibility studies for pedestrian/bicycle bridges, and improve linkages between River Trail and street -level routes. 5.10 Tumer/Dodge - properties located west of Tumer/Dodge House include homes that were moved to Capitol Avenue (south of North St.). This project, which includes improvements in the ROW, needs to be resolved and completed. 5.11 Suggestion - Under "City -Wide," item d: add "provide linkages between park facilities and other City attractions. " to the end of the sentence. 5.11 Acquisition/Disposals: A map would be very helpful. 5.11 Disposals: Mifflin Property is in the flood plain. Limited potential for single family development provided flood plain permits are obtained. 5.12 Elmhurst Park - Suggestion: Get surrounding neighborhoods involved in strengthening the school's involvement in the maintenance of overall area if the school takes over the park. C.25 Planning Office Review. of Page 3 Parks and Recreation Draft Master Plan 2000-2005 January 20, 2000 5.14 Potter Park and Zoo - Raised beds for gardening for the disabled. This sounds like a great idea. Could possibly include a children's garden or component to get a good intergenerational mix to the project. 5.14 Adopt -a Park - may become more and more important as City costs -continue to rise in maintaining and improving what Parks we have. A.15 Suggestion: Give' Olds Stadium/Lansing Center/City Market greater emphasis in this document. A.22 Much of the remaining privately owned open space will eventually be developed. A.24 Suggestion: The Adopt -A -Park discussion should mention that traffic islands/medians are now maintained by Public Service Department which does not trim shrubs. Those who "adopt" a park should have some official recognition, sign off from neighborhood organization, or proof of being able to perform according to an agreement. Adopt -a - highway could also be implemented along City streets (e.g., Forestry Commission - Champaign, IL). Churches could be actively engaged in parks and recreation programs. A sure bet for an Adopt -A -Park program would be the Community Gardens programs. A.30 "As our urban environment continues to become more `risky', the Leisure Services Division must continue to design programs that promote developmental skills and provide personal satisfaction to the users." Suggestion: Clarify the term "risky." Does that refer to hazardous or dangerous recreational activities (e.g., extreme sports), or safety/security threats? D1 Other Plans referenced- Should include the City of Lansing's Master Plan and the Plan for Development of Lansing's Waterfront. P.5 An Adopt -an -Acre program should be considered, so groups can take care of a particular section of a park. GENERAL COMMENTS: Relationship with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan was recognized only by way of its proposed land use and circulation maps (pp. 1.16- 1.24). The text, which contains policies and recommendations, was omitted. Suggestion: The Comprehensive Plan policies related to parks should be referenced in this plan and included in future editions. Other Funding Sources: Concern was expressed by the Department Director (p. iv ) on finding other ways to fund the Parks and Recreation Department other than the General Fund. Some demographic groups are often assumed to be unable to pay (e.g., seniors and teens). The City could set up credits, scholarships, etc. to those who lack ability to pay. It could start 'workreation' programs where kids work in exchange for the use of facilities, such as pools or ball games. We could look to many other communities to explore creative ways of paying for programs and park improvements. Lansing is rich in its people resources. C.26 Planning Office Review of Page 4 Parks and Recreation Draft Master Plan 2000-2005 January 20, 2000 A Teen Center: City Council, (on Page b2) lists a Teen Center and a Youth Advisory Commission under its goals for the Human Relations and Community Services Department. It seems these would have a direct relationship to the Parks and Recreation Department. Mutt Mitts: This should certainly be just a part of an overall strategy to get owners to pick up animal waste. Required dog licensing could possibly be combined with education and discounted "pooper scoopers." Conflict should be. anticipated from a proposal to designate any parks as "dog parks." Community Centers: These are great locations for neighborhood organizations to hold meetings and various neighborhood functions and fundraisers. Use of the centers by neighborhood organizations would increase participation in the centers, strengthen the partnership between the Parks and Recreation Department and residents, thereby widening the base of support for the Department. The Foster and Letts Centers both have fairly active use by neighborhood organizations. Gier and Miller Road Centers probably have much less use, if any, by neighborhood organizations. It appears, according to p. 2.7, that there is no advisory group for the Miller Road Center. Privatization of activities/programs in public parks: There is little discussion of privatization of activities/programs in public parks. The proposal for an "extreme" park at Ranney Park would be the exception. Regional Importance of Centrally Located Parks: The parks that are fairly central to the Lansing region are clustered together. Potter Park/Crego/Fenner/Scott Woods/Forest View Park (and Mt. Hope and Evergreen Cemeteries) to comprise the greatest amount of (publicly) owned open space in the region. Linkages should be emphasized to and among these regional parks with river trail connections, trail/bike path connections, etc. Information posted at each of the parks regarding the area would strengthen the focus of this area as a significant "natural" area that has much to offer. Historic Preservation: Emphasis and attention to the historic character of buildings and the significance of historic events that have occurred in City parks and the three rivers would add a richness to the experience that historic context provides. Much of Lansing's history is based on the river. For example, the confluence of the Grand and Red Cedar River has much significance in the history of Native Americans to this area. The Pottawatomi Indian Gardens off of E. Willow at the north end of CACS property. Parks mentioned in the Memorandum '76 document lists the following parks of significance: Oak or East Park, Durant Park, and Reutter Park. Structures of historic significance include Lansing City Market and Moores Park pool. Sites include Lansing's First House and Early Dam Site at Race and E. Maple Street. The preservation of views should be mentioned (e.g., Francis Park, Cooley Gardens, Sheffield Park, etc.) Lansing is one of Michigan's six significant cultural heritage corridor areas now affiliated with the National Parks Service. An inventory of cultural and recreational resources administered by the Parks and Recreation Department is underway, and a plan to preserve and market these resources will be necessary. Some Parks facilities, such as Durant, Reutter, and Riverfront Park C.27 Planning Office Review of Page 5 Parks and Recreation Draft Master Plan 2000-2005 January 20, 2000 are included in the American National Automobile Heritage Corridor proposal, which may lead to national recognition as historical resources. Community Gardens: This program, administered,by The Garden Project, through the Ingham Co. Health Dept., is an excellent program for residents, regardless of income, age, race or ethnicity. They are good for recreation, therapy and food, and tend to benefit persons with low incomes. The program is trying to find a way to continue funding while attracting higher income people to the program. There are currently `two community gardens that are located in City parks (e.g., Foster and Risdale Parks). The potential use of parks for community gardens, possibly through the Adopt -a -Park program, would be a good way of putting public parks to good use. A reciprocal agreement could be made to have some contribution by gardeners toward some limited park maintenance or other improvements. These types of programs should be recognized and strengthened. Facilitating such programs in the future could generate positive PR and be upheld as a way of furthering Lansing as a World Class City. Much of the produce gleaned from the gardens is donated to food banks. Park Beautification: A partnership among the various programs such as Neighborhoods in Bloom and the City's "Beautification Squads" (p. b4) could be strengthened with the active participation of the Master Gardeners program. The City could recruit Master Gardeners for various projects where candidates in the program are required to put in many hours of doing gardening projects or giving workshops to the community. Beautification projects within median strips or alongside streets within the public right-of-way could be largely organized and sponsored by nearby businesses or business associations. Good examples are found in East Lansing, along Trowbridge Road and along Lake Lansing Road, near Meijers. City/regional Oldsmobile Park: This is hardly mentioned at all in this Master Plan. This is one of the City's most significant regional recreational facilities. Regional approaches to recreation: The Music Festival by LEPFA at Adado Riverfront (p. A.15) is a good regional effort. Possibly have some music performances along Washington Avenue to benefit downtown businesses. Crime prevention/sense of security: Anti -Graffiti program through Public Art - murals, sculptures. The Philadelphia's Mural Arts Program is a success story. It started as a training ground for former graffiti writers, and developed into a professional organization creating sophisticated works of public art. Citywide linkages: Other linkages to be made throughout the City could include abandoned railroad and utility rights of way (See the City's Master Plan). Wildlife/Open Space vs. Development: Privately owned vacant land is often assumed to be publicly owned by nearby residents. C.28 Planning Office Review of Page 6 Parks and Recreation Draft Master Plan 2000-2005 January 20, 2000 Other Areas Not Covered: • Flood plains and waterways. • Street ends at the riverfront. • Concentration/coordination of economic development efforts along the River Trail • Interurban trail. • Urban Scenic Corridor: (Forest Road) Private uses of public parks. • Memorials/Historic markers in public parks. • Historic character of bridges that, due to construction, age, design, contribute to the character of the waterfront. (See page 73 of the Waterfront Plan.) C.29 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES DECEMBER 7,1999 PAGE 6 The applicant, SBA, which has pressure by communication companies to have a tower in that area, has sought this alternative location. If we hadn't looked at the Hill site originally, to accommodate the school district, we would have looked near here, because right next door the City has a storm water detention basin. It would have been an ideal site for a cell tower. This is just as well - located. It won't be in main sight views. For your information, we have included a complete draft report, because the Board of Zoning Appeals is meeting Thursday night to consider the height variance. Staff, knowing what we have studied in the past, has recommended approval and wanted to get that information on the table pending this public hearing. MARK ROBERTS, SBA, 26211 CENTRAL PARK BLVD., STE. 415, SOUTHFIELD, MICHIGAN. This site is in the same area we were looking in previously; however, unfortunately, our plans with the School District did not go well. Maybe this is a better site from a planning standpoint. It is closer to the freeway intersection, which is what we are trying to serve, and more removed from residential areas. Overall, I think we have ended up at a better place, but the long way around. I have reviewed staffs evaluation. I concur with their analysis regarding special land use criteria. I have reviewed conditions and have no objections to them as written. If you have questions, I would be glad to answer them. Seeing no one else wishing to comment, the Chairman announced the close of the public hearing for SLU-14-99, 6140 Pleasant Grove Road, Public Utility Facility in "G-2" Wholesale District (Tower), and referral to the Zoning and Ordinance Committee, meeting at 4 p.m. Wednesday, December 15, 1999 in the Department Conference Room at 316 N. Capitol Avenue. 4. PRESENTATION A. Parks and Recreation Department: Five -Year Plan TANYA MOORE, PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT. We have been working on the Parks & Recreation Department Five -Year Master Plan for many months. The culmination is a thick document; you have received excerpts from that document. The purpose, first, is that we need to submit it to the Michigan Department of Natural Resources by March 1, 2000, in order to apply for grants for CIP projects. The other use is for our department to identify CIP projects, which would be any project of $15,000 or more, and for the Park Board and department administrators, mayor, and council to set their priorities. We will be going to the Park Board on December 15 for final recommendations. We have been to them twice now, in October and November. The copies you have C.30 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES DECEMBER 7,1999 PAGE 7 received have the calendar outlining our present position, where we are going, and where we have been. The critical deadlines fall in the next couple of months. You have copies of the DNR checklists, items they require us to cover in this Master Plan. You have the Director's comments. You have an excerpt on the Administrative Structure, and the Action Plan, which is probably the most important document. It tells what we are going to do, why, and also contains a Capitol Improvements Schedule, which has the potential grant -funded project. You have the Master Projects list for all of the CIP projects for the next five.years and beyond. It is about seven or eight pages, maybe ten. You have the CIP 2001 list, which we submitted to Budget for next year, a copy of program and operational needs which are additional staffing. - Last would be maps of the potential grant -funded projects. We will be going to Council with this plan January 3, 2000, for final approval by them in February. They will set a public hearing sometime in January. We would like your comments and endorsement of this plan. Mr. Frederick asked about the River Trail access to Cooley Gardens. "We discussed that ... I am glad to see that item there." Why is it in a five-year projection? Ms. Moore said Parks does not have grants specifically for the River Trail for the next couple years. Other entities have approached Parks with partial funding -for other sections, thus lending higher precedence. To do the planning, apply for the grant and construct the access puts it five years down the road. There is an existing indirect link via sidewalk at South Washington Avenue. Ms. Love commented this could be important in reviewing Act 285 petitions coming before the Board from the Parks Department for completion of some programs, buying or selling property, or acquiring easements that'are required to go through the Planning Board. Now we have an idea of where the projects fit in the overall Plan. Mr. Smith asked about grading in Scotts Wood Park, and what area? Ms. Moore said the trail is natural —not handicap accessible. The trail, over a period of time, will be packed hard and covered with limestone to make it more usable by handicapped people from Ingham Rehab, while at the same time interfering with the natural landscape as little as possible. In August, the five-year Parks millage will be before the voters. "We depend for our CIP projects almost entirely on the millage." Chairman Nischan thanked Ms. Moore for her presentation. 6. COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE (Five minutes each) - None. 7. RECESS - Zoning and Ordinance Committee will meet for new information on LS-22-99, 921, 927, 1000, 1004, 1008, 1010, 1016, 1020 West Lenawee. C.31 Regular Meeting LANSING PLANNING BOARD 7 p.m., Tenth Floor City Council Chambers, Lansing City Hall Tuesday, December 7, 1999 AGENDA 1. OPENING SESSION in City Council Chambers -at 7 p.m. Roll Call B Excused Absences - Ruge. .At the meeting of November 16, 1999, Mr. Ruge requested and was granted an excused absence. C Introductions ' 2 APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. COMMUNICATIONS A Memorandum dated November 17, 1999 from Doris M. Witherspoon, Senior Planner, presenting additional information Re: LS-22-99, 921, 927, 1000, 1004, 1008, 1010, 1016, 1020 West Lenawee 4. PRESENTATION A Parks and Recreation Department Five -Year Plan 5. HEARINGS A NCU-4-99, 1022 Eureka Street, Fire -Damaged Nonconforming 8-unit B. SLU-1 3-99, 1200 Blk Jerome Street, Parking Lot in "C" Residential Dist. C. SLU-14-99, 6140 Pleasant Grove Road, Public Utility Facility in "G2" Wholesale District (Tower) 6. COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE (5 minutes each) 7. RECESS - Zoning and Ordinance Committee will need to meet for new information on LS 2-99, 921, 927, 1000, 1004, 1008, 1010, 1016, 1020 West Lenawee. 8. BUSINESS SESSION A Minutes for Approval: November 16, 1999 B. Committee Reports 1. Zoninq and Ordinance Committee a. LS-22-99, 921, 927, 1000, 1004, 1008, 101.0, 1016, 1020 West Lenawee Next meeting Wednesday, December 15, 1999, at 4 p.m., 316 N. Capitol Avenue, Department Conference Room. 2. Urban Development Committee a. Ad-19-98, 120 E. Shiawassee Street, Fire Station #1, Market/Sale for Mid -Rise Residential with Building Preserved b. Ad 20-97/Ad-26-98, East St. Joseph Street, Vacate from Cherry Street to Grand Avenue C. 1000-1006 South Washington Avenue, Proposed Krentel Block Historic District C.32 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA DECEMBER 7, 1999 Page 2 Next meeting date to be ammriced. 4. Executive Committee C. Report from Planning Manager D. Pending Items: Future action required 1. Zonina and Ordinance Committee a. Z-19-97, N.W. Cor. Cavanaugh & Aurelius, or Commercial to 'G-2' Wholesale District (fabled October 15, 1997) b. Z 1-98, •1223 N. Turner St., W Light, Industrial District to 'G-1' Business District (Tabled February 11,1998) C. Z-4-98, 201 E. Grand River, `F-1' Commercial &,`W Light Industrial Districts to 'G-1' Business District (fabled June 10,1998) d. Z 5-98, 401-407 E. Grand River, OF Commercial District to 'G-1' Business. District (Tabled June 10,1998) e. L.S-22-99, 921, 927, 1000,1004, 1008, 1010, 1016, 1020 West Lenawee - 2. Urban Development Committee b. Act-24-98, Everett Lane at Paris St., Vacate ROW (Tabled February 16,1999) C. Act-7-99, Somer+croft Drive at Post Oak Lane, Vacate Public Right-of-way for School Panting (Referred to UDC May 18, 1999) d. Act-14-99, 100 Blk. West Elm Street, Sale of Property 9. NEW BUSINESS A Board Meeting Schedule - Y2K Meetings 10. COMMENTS FROM CHAIRPERSON 11. COMMENTS FROM BOARD MEMBERS 12- BOARD MEMBER CODE ENFORCEMENT NOTIFICATION REPORTS 13. ADJOURNMENT 17 FOR SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS, PLEASE GIVE NOTICE 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING BY CALLING LOUISE H. CHRISTIAN AT 483-4066 OR 483-4088 TDD. 120799AGA DEC C . 3 3 Lansing Park system under rev'py11 consideks.tip'anding River .Trail - re Ways to pay for $9 million project may stir up debate By Vincent Delgado . Lansing State Journal The Red Cedar River where Beth Hunter and Ray Ackerson took a break with their dogs last, week bubbled like a wild Michigan river. "This is our favorite said.Ackerson, of north sing, on the Aurelius Road leg = r: of Lansing's River Trail. "You can walk for miles and miles from here." And miles and miles'more, if a master plan under discussion ' in' City Hall becomes• reality Under the plan,'the six -mile. .--•Rivg Tmil-.would gget a $p�mil lion expansion, allowing it to:, wind south to Delhi Township, northwest to Delta Township and west to Lansing Township ' by 2005. Included in the plan is a new , East Lansing link, which the city expects to be open this week. The plan — more blueprint . . than legal mandate — also calls for facelifts to each of the city's Room to nun: Kristen Mu Ilaney of 108 parks on 2,500 acres, pri- .Zoo..A•Lansing Parks and Recre vate management of city ceme- teries and a,park just for dogs. wvrKS; ou>: on ine river I ran near Potter Park an calls for expanding the trail. But how to pay for the ie Lengthening the River Trail.- provements, which don't have . a final price tag, may generate The city's River Trail is a big winner in the dtaft of Parks and Recreation's 2000-2005 master the most debate. plan. By 2004,.the city would have spent nearly $9 million on the River Trail, which would wind A host of public input ses- dozens of. miles — as'far east as Harrison Road, as far west as Delta Township and as far south sions are planned. The Lansing as Cavanaugh Road. C C' o rty uncil is expected to de- bate the proposal m January —. a little more than nine months _ before the city goes to taaxxppay- to its Key to map• r .ers renew $1.5 million" parks millage. Existing Rivet Trail, The millage costs the owner Leg Start date Cost'„ of a $60,000 house in Lansing about $30 a year. - 2000 $3 110 000'" Even if City Council ap- 2000 $200,000 sa lnaw g proves the plan, the city is not 2001 $260,000 bound to follow it. "This is a plan," said Parks .� 2002 $105 000 st JoaaF and Recreation Director Eric �� 2002 $200,000 Reickel. "It's not a policy. Ev- 4� 2002 •$T,900,000 ' erything still takes parks board, mayor and council approval, .,�..,� 2003 . $750,000 and in some cases depends on what kind of grants we can get. But it still gives us an. idea of 2003 $600,000 2Q04 $1,800,000 �. -r1 -where we can be in five years. Total $f1,925,000; Meanwhile; if the River Trail"3 expands its size —and its popu- »sys lanty along with other attrac- lions like the Potter Park Zoo — 27 some in Lansing question why city taxpayers should pay for the entire parks system,.which :. - Please see PLAN 2A state ♦ , N •'CNppsrt StreM to Harris- Road sealon M a Iolni pmlael with East L&Mft.. paid for by Mate and local governments. lensing State Journal C.34 i O CU co CM co c ICU J M a7 o>' rn 04 N I M E O Z has an annual cost of about $10 million. Some park use say expanding the River Trail — itself an item on a mas- ter plan 20 years ago —would turn the trall into a major regional artery for walkers and joggers, opening access to three other mtd-Michigan commu- nities 'for the first time. Hunter, for instance, , said that Would only in- crease Lansing's park popularity. . "The trail was a great idea in the first place," she said. Rodney Stokes, state Parks and Plane.Other'. im r vements outlinedo Continued FROM 1A ateamid-Micluganauthoritywithtax ing dower to manage area -wide at-•: hachons such as Potter Park . - "If in fact you want to be treated- equally,.then help support the zoo, equally," he said. Other ideas in the plan: ■ Skate and BMX bike parks. ■ Improving all four city golf; courses. ■ Dog parks — which would al low dogs to run off leashes. Ackerson, the northside resident, • said he'd favor a park for his two dops. "They love to, socialize," he said: recreation division chief and a 20- year Lansing parks user, said voters will approve the 5-year millage pro- posal. They have passed it twice since 1989. . ' They are providing recreational opportunities not just for city resi- dents but for people outside the city," .said Stokes, an East Lansing resident. But how much longer the city can afford one of the larger urban park systems in the state may cause the most debate, Reickel, said. The master plan proposes •imple- menting more user fees and regional- izing the system's largest attraction, Potter Park Zoo. City taxpayers subsi- dize the zoo with about $1.5 million annually, while more people from out- side the city use it than those from inside the city. Reickel said separate rate struc- tures for residents and nonresidents, in effect at the zoo for the first time this year, ma be the beginning. Lansing adults pay $3 to get into the zoo. Nonresident adults pay $5. Reickel said the region could, achieve parity, in another way.. He said regional leaders could cre- PARK BOARD AGENDA December 15, 1999 BOARD MEMBERS: Mary James, Robert Brockwell, Judith Mohay Filice, Wilbur Howard, Ruth Leyrer, Ronald Lott, Kris Nicholoff, John Pollard CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 P.M., Foster Community Center, 200 N. Foster 1. , ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA 2. STATEMENTS OF CITIZENS The public may address the Board on the non -agenda items. Comments should be limited to three minutes on any single item. The public may also address the Board on agenda items after the presentation of the item and the Park Board members' questions have been answered. 3. BOARD MEETING MINUTES * A. October 27, 1999 Park Board Minutes (no quorum 11117/9) B. Receive other department board meeting minutes 4. OLD BUSINESS * A. Senior Golf Card Groesbeck request of Douglas McGiveron 5. NEW BUSINESS * A. Disposal of Genesee Parcel * B. Request to accept property donation by Oak Park c@ 427-429 Dorrance Place C. Withdraw Grant Application for River Trail NW Extension to Tecumseh Park * D. Master Plan Referral to Mayor and Council 6. DIRECTOR'S REPORT A. Report on Skatepark Sites - Team Pain Enterprises, Inc. B. Potter Park Zoo Informational Signage Update C. Ranney Park Master Plan 7. INFORMATION A. Wonderland of Lights B. Turner -Dodge Family Christmas C. River Trail Map D. Update of Working Session Notes (10/26 & 10/27) E. Community Activities Guide 8. REMARKS BY BOARD MEMBERS * requires board action C.36 EXCERPT FROM PARK BOARD MINUTES OF December 15, 1999 MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary James, Robert Brockwell, Wilbur Howard, Judith Mohay Filice, Ron Lott, Kris Nicholoff, John Pollard MEMBERS ABSENT: Ruth Leyrer (unexcused) OTHERS PRESENT: R. Eric Reickel, Director; Tanya Moore, Landscape Architect CALL TO ORDER: 7:10 P.M., Foster Community Center, 200 N. Foster PARK MASTER PLAN Filice wondered why we are recommending Fairview Park be turned over to the Ingham County Drain Commission as it is a spectacular park and the Park Board had a great deal to do with it becoming this premier park. Pointed discussion followed. MOTION: Filice moved that Fairview Park be removed from the Five Year Master Plan; seconded by Pollard. Motion carried. (Yes -James, Filice, Pollard; No-Brockwell, Nicholoff; Abstain -Howard) Filice also noted the language used in reference to the school district's deteriorating properties is negative and it could be kinder while remaining factual. Pollard observed there is too much money being spent on the River Trail from the millage. In Project PLAY the distribution of projects seems skewed. He didn't see cost information on the skatepark. He also wants a concrete slab for roller hockey to keep the kids from playing roller hockey on the tennis courts. Moore noted the CIP list is from the master project list which could be grant eligible. It doesn't mean other projects will not be done. Pollard again observed spending our money primarily on grant eligible projects is not what the citizens want. We cannot jeopardize the millage. (Ron Lott arrived.) Nicholoff did mention that unlike natural river frontage, the tollgate drain project at Fairview Park has no supervision and there is some liability. The Director will inquire as to our liability at Fairview Park. James noted that this is a plan and a living document. Just because it is or isn't in the plan, does not mean it will or will not happen. It is a general guideline and it will qualify us for grants with the State of Michigan. MOTION: Brockwell moved the corrected plan be forwarded to the Mayor; seconded by Howard. Motion carried. C.37 PARK BOARD AGENDA November 17, 1999 BOARD MEMBERS: Mary James, Robert Brockwell, Judith Mohay Filice, Wilbur Howard, Ruth Leyrer, Ronald Lott, Kris Nicholoff, John Pollard EXCUSED ABSENCE: Robert Brockwell, Wilbur Howard CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 P.M., Foster Community Center, 200 N. Foster 1. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA 2. STATEMENTS OF CITIZENS The public may address the Board on the non -agenda items. Comments should be limited to three minutes on any single item. The public may also address the Board on agenda items after the presentation of the item and the Park Board members' questions have been answered. 3. PUBLIC COMMENT PARKS & RECREATION 5 YEAR MASTER PLAN 2000-2005 4. BOARD MEETING MINUTES A. October 27, 1999 Park Board Minutes B. Receive other department board meeting minutes 5. OLD BUSINESS A. Senior Golf Card Groesbeck request of Douglas McGiveron 6. NEW BUSINESS A. Disposal of Genesee Parcel B. Request to accept property donation by Oak Park @ 427-429 Dorrance Place C. Withdraw Grant Application for River Trail NW Extension to Tecumseh Park 7. DIRECTOR'S REPORT A. Report on Skatepark Sites - Team Pain Enterprises, Inc. B. Potter Park Zoo Informational Signage Update 8. INFORMATION A. Silver Bells In the City B. Wonderland of Lights C. Turner -Dodge Family Christmas D. River Trail Map E. Update of Working Session Notes (10126 & 10127) 9. REMARKS BY BOARD MEMBERS requires board action Items in italics are late items. C.38 Excerpt dealing with Master Plan PARK BOARD NOTES November 17,1999 MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary James, Judith Mohay Filice, Ron Lott (excused late arrival), Ruth Leyrer MEMBERS ABSENT: Robert Brockwell, Wilbur Howard, Kris Nicholoff, John Pollard OTHERS PRESENT: Jack Murphy, Shuffleboard Club; Joan Sheldon, Downtown Durant; Dorothy James, Moores Park Neighborhood; Lucy Hunley, Comstock Park; Don Ballard, Golf Manger, Phil Dorland, Deputy Director, R. Eric Reickel, Director of Parks and Recreation. MASTER PLAN PUBLIC COMMENT Jack Murphy, 2468 Eifert Road, Holt, commented on Moores Park Shuffleboard Courts. He notes the process is underway for improvements but improvements won't happen until July 1, 2000. They would like it before the season starts for shuffleboarding which is June 1. Once the fence is up the courts will be protected and the courts shouldn't be resurfaced prior to that happening. The Club is willing to work with the City to get the fence up and the courts resurfaced. He would like some information on that prior to June the 1'. The club is open to anyone by paying a modest fee. The courts can also be used by anyone even once the fence is up if the City supervises the use. He thanked Mr. Reickel for the letter and he wants to continue to make improvements. Filice noted the fencing is provided for in the budget plan for FY 2000-2001 but she sees no provision for resurfacing. She was under the impression the courts had been resurfaced fairly recently. Reickel explained this was part of the restoration of five or six years ago, but this is basically a maintenance item and not a capital item. Filice wondered what the life expectancy of court resurfacings. Murphy thought it would be five years or so. Filice asked how many club members there were and how many were residents of the City of Lansing. Murphy responded that there are about 40 members but they don't know how many are residents. Joan Sheldon, 726 Seymour, Lansing, represented the Downtown Neighborhood Association and also Friends of Durant Park. She was disappointed the Friends of Durant Park was not listed as one of the support groups listed under "Relationships with Other Agencies" since they have been meeting since 1994 and were incorporated in 1998. She sat on the Downtown Parks Focus Group, and wanted more emphasis on downtown parks (Durant, Ferris and Reutter). The group discussed that everyone coming into the City passes by the downtown parks and there should be more emphasis on to impress people coming to the Capitol on business, etc. The committee also asked for a maintenance and landscape person to help with planting and maintenance. They have volunteers but volunteers don't have the knowledge to form a proper planting plan. Filice asked about the section of beautification on city parks. It was explained this was from a committee report —the Downtown Parks Committee Report (A.13-15) also in Appendix G it explains more people are needed in the grounds and landscape section. The Council Budget priorities in terms of staff expansion are contrary to these requests. Reickel also explained the committee reports were a compilation of the opinions of the committee. In the Action Plan, it will be a more generic statement and not a specific statement for any particular area. C.39 Park Board Meeting Notes (excerpt), November 17, 1999 Page 2 Dorland explained the focus groups were given direction to come up with five goals and the entire group folded the many things discussed at the meetings into the five goals. Reickel confirmed the draft of the report was distributed to group members. Sheldon noted the primary concerns were all to do with maintenance and she would like to see Durant, Ferris and Reutter specifically noted. Dorothy Jones, 426 W. Barnes, Lansing, representing the Moores Park Neighborhood Organization. Jones asked if there was landscaping planned for the River Trail ending at Moores Park as they were trying to plan something in that area. Director noted there are not flowers planned for this area. The trail will be blended in. It will in essence be lawn area. There are no specific plans for any ornamentals at this point in time. Director will provide Jones with a copy of the plan for this area. Ludy, 131 E. Kilborn, Lansing, representing Friends of Comstock Park. The group adopted this park and would like to see repairs made to the warming but to allow the Friends to use it year-round for programming. She knows this would be costly but would like the Board to consider it. This neighborhood has modest incomes and home ownership is less than 50 percent. The upstairs is being used to store barrels and while the Parks and Recreation Department needs storage space, there are so many things that could be done recreation wise with both adults and children in that area —Euchre games to Taekwondo. Dorland noted two items in the plan for Comstock. They are to make restrooms accessible and to repave, sign and line the parking lot. Reickel noted Bonnie Bennett of the Comstock group has contacted the department asking for space in the upper level. One of the problems we have in the park system is there is limited space and limited facilities for our day-to-day maintenance operation. While we don't like using Comstock to store barrels or using Sycamore shelter to repair picnic tables, we have no choice. Our major goal is to get a proper maintenance center at Oak Park where we can provide the correct facilities to operate this park system and release those buildings that were not designed to store barrels or restore picnic tables. Filice wondered what this group could do in the meantime. Reickel noted the Friends of Comstock use the lower level for community programs and meetings. Filice noted that if the upstairs space was used, heating, safety, etc. would need to be considered. This would be a major renovation. Reickel noted we will need to look at all older facilities. Hard decisions will have to be made as to what will need to be done with these buildings. They must either be brought up to code or demolished. The artificial ice rink slab will soon be a question. It is 25 years old and beyond its life expectancy. End of comment on Master Plan. C.40 Lansing State Journal, November 17, 1999 Coloiall Village* Association will take a look at Y2K issues Colonial Village Neighborhooddisc Association will ussY2K prob- lem compliance issues at its month- ly, meeting at 7 p.m. todayy. Speakers from the city of Lansing" and the Board of Water. and light will talk about the issues at Grace United Methodist Church, 1900 Boston BIvd. If you would. like more, informa- tion please call Randy .Williams at 882-5831. Help needed The River Point • Neighborhood Orgapm' tion needs businesses and individuals who are willing to help remodel their new Community Po- lice Office. They need donations of building materials, drywall, money and lots of labor help to have the office fin- ished by their December meeting. Anyone who can give River Point a helping hand please call Dave Zimmerman at 484-3283. Park plan proposed The Lansing Parks and Recrea- tion Department will hold a meeting for public comment on the proposed Parks and Recreation Five Year Cheryl Risner I-- . n the Neighborhood Master Plan at '7 p.m. today In Room 213 a the Foster Community Center, 200 N. Foster Ave. The Master Plan will be available for review through today at the' Gier, Letts, and Foster community centers. The Master Plan will also be available for review at: the Parks and Recreation Administration of- fice, the City Council office, the City Council office, the City Clerk's of- fice and the Planning and Neighbor- hood Development office. Grant. information A public meeting• to explain changes to the 2000 Neighborhood 'Advisory Board Grants will be held C7 Wtts Community'pem1dtKm St. Grant applications are available at the following locations: City Hall Lobby, 124 W. Michigan Ave.; Fos- ter Community Center, 200 N. Fos- ter Ave.; Gier Community Center, 2400. Ha11:St.; Letts. Community Center, 1220 W., Kalamazoo St.; North Network Center, 847 W. Wil- low St.; South Network Center, 3400 S. Cedar St.; Lansing Public . library, 401 S. Capitol Ave.; Lan- sing Public Library, 3400 S. Cedar If you have any questions please call the mayors office at 483-4141. Cheryl Risner Is director of the Lansing Neighborhood Council. If you have a question about your neighborhood or want to start an association, call her at 372-6290. C.41 Nov 04 99 10:58a Kolt & Serkaian Comm, Inc 517-332-5080 p.2 SE FROM THE CITY OF LANSING NEWS RELEA PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT For Immediate Release Eric Reickel 483-4297 November 5, 1999 Tanya Moore 483-4282 PROPOSED PARK PLAN PRESENTED AT PUBLIC MEETING Lansing Parks and Recreation Department will hold a meeting for public comment on the proposed Parks and Recreation Five Year Master Plan at 7 p.m., Wednesday, November 17 in Room 213 at the Foster Community Center, 200 Foster Avenue. "The Parks and Recreation Master Plari proposes improvements that affect all Lansing citizens," said Eric Reickel, Director of the Parks & Recreation Department. "It is important that neighborhood residents provide their input on the Master Plan." The Master Plan document will be available for review Wednesday, November 10 through Wednesday, November 17 at the Gier, Letts, and Foster community centers. The Master Plan will also be available for review at: the Parks and Recreation Administration office, the City Council office, the City Clerk's office, and the Planning and Neighborhood Development office. The Parks and Recreation Department will provide a plan overview to the City Planning Board Friday, December 7. Lansing City Council must review and approve the Parks and Recreation Master Plan prior to the Department of Natural Resources submission deadline of March 1, 2000. A public hearing on the Master Plan will be scheduled in January. C . 4 2 PARK BOARD AGENDA October 27, 1999 BOARD MEMBERS: Mary James, Robert Brockwell, Judith Mohay Filice, Wilbur Howard, Ruth Leyrer, Kris Nicholoff, John Pollard EXCUSED ABSENCE: Kris Nicholoff CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 P.M. Letts Community Center, 1220 W. Kalamazoo St. 1. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA 2. STATEMENTS OF CITIZENS The public may address the Board on the non -agenda items. Comments should be limited to three minutes on any single item. The public may also address the Board on agenda items after the presentation of the item and the Park Board members' questions have been answered. ' 3. BOARD MEETING MINUTES * A. September 22, 1999 Park Board Minutes B. Receive other department board meeting minutes 4. NEW BUSINESS A. Moores Park Shuffleboard Group * _ B. Senior Golf Gold Card Groesbeck request of Douglas McGiveron * C. Veterans Group - Request for Memorial to General Logan * D. Easement move - River Trail East * E. Fenner Inholding Grant Amendment (extension) * F. Frances Shoreline Grant Amendment (extension) 5. OLD BUSINESS A. Budget FY 2001 * 1) CIP and Designated Fund Projects * 2) Program/Priority Changes and New Programs B. Parks & Recreation Five Year Master Plan 6. DIRECTOR'S REPORT A. Frances Park/Moores River Drive Shoreline Update 7. INFORMATION A. Washington Park Ice Skating B. Potter Park Zoological Society Income Statements 8. REMARKS BY BOARD MEMBERS requires board action Items in italics are late items: C.43 Excerpt Dealing with Master Plan PARK BOARD MINUTES OCTOBER 27, 1999 MEMBERS PRESENT: Mary James, Robert Brockwell, Wilbur Howard, Judith Mohay Filice, Ruth Leyrer, Ron Lott (excused late arrival at 8:10), John Pollard MEMBERS ABSENT: Kris Nicholoff (excused) OTHERS PRESENT:' John David, National Bicycle League; Debbie & Brian Haught, Dan Lienerth, Heather McKenzie, BMX; Wally Juall, James T. Lyons, Lewis Garcia, Bill Vernon, Leonard B. Zimmerman, Alfreda Schmidt, Veteran's Issue; David Wiener, Mayor's Office/Memorial Review _ Board; Douglas N. McGiveron, Edward C. Tarka, Senior Golf Gold Card; Kay Lyons; Roger Fox, Landscape Architects & Planners; R. Eric Reickel, Director; Phil Dorland, Deputy Director; Murdock Jemerson, Leisure Services Manager CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 P.M. Letts Community Center, 1220 W. Kalamazoo Street PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN Phil Dorland distributed a packet which included Council proceedings relating to the sale of the Civic Center per the Board's request. The Board discussed the lack of facilities for veterans and seniors. Use of the Scott House by the seniors and others was discussed. Dorland explained the Five Year Parks and Recreation Plan is required to be on file with the DNR for state grant eligibility. The DNR Trust Fund grants are currently the only grants available. A recap of the master plan discussion of October 26, 1999, was also distributed and discussed. Some suggestions were received for clarity including adding a Code of Conduct for cleaning up sports fields, more concentration on youth and teen programs, and more support for Adopt -A - Park. Howard was not at the previous master plan meeting but he did note that the Senior Citizens are incorporated in the Community Centers and there is no separate senior program. He feels if we are concerned with the schools and the youth, we also need to be concerned with our seniors. From input he receives from the community, Lansing has gone backwards in their senior programming and this should be noted. Dorland explained that there had been a senior coordinator for the department and separate from that was the Lansing Senior Center. The Center was folded into the Parks and Recreation Department and a position was lost in this combining. When the Senior Activity Coordinator retired in 1992, this position was not funded. Jemerson explained the only position that is missing is the coordinator position. There are two programmers that work with a senior leader who runs the programming from Letts, Gier and Miller Road. Howard noted that administratively when the senior coordinator's position was not filled after it became vacant in 1992, the programming has not kept up. Reickel explained this position was kept on the chart as unfunded for several years trying to get the position funded, but C .44 Park Board Minutes - October 27,1999 Page 2 we were unsuccessful. Jemerson explained there was no demand for the position from seniors in this area. The most he hears is from this Board. The Director noted there are many programs in this area and therefore many options for seniors. Howard and Filice are seriously concerned about this situation and would like senior programming enhanced. James suggested the department look regionally at senior programming, consider what the department's contribution should be and look for innovative programs. After the census is done, demographic information can be used to determine programming. Pollard though a statement noting the lack of senior programming should be added. Dorland stated he would add some information on the Board's concern regarding senior citizen programming. Filice also noted Scott House should be recommended as a welcoming center for future consideration. She also would like after school skating programs connected with scholarships with transportation included in the scholarship funding. Jemerson noted the teens at Foster Center have done a tremendous job with the Haunted House at Foster. It was amazing the tremendous job they did. Pollard thought the youth should get an award of some type. MASTER PLAN POTENTIAL PROJECTS AND POSSIBLY GRANT PROJECTS A list of projects in the $50,000 through $1,000,000+ level was distributed along with a list of which of those project may qualify for possible grants. Dorland noted one of the primary purposes of the master plan is to determine a plan as to what grants sources will be pursued. The projects that may qualify for grant funding were listed according to their probability of receiving grant funding. Dorland noted Reickel's background is extremely helpful in putting together a list of projects that may qualify for grants. Pollard asked about the matching millage funding. Typically it is 25% of the grant. Reickel noted this is a list of potential projects that may qualify, but in any one year only one project would qualify otherwise they would be competing against each other. They are not prioritized for the grant list. These grant projects are also on the CIP. Dorland noted staff takes this information and the comments from park board to develop the Action Plan portion of the plan. This is what will be put on public display November 10. At the November 17 Park Board meeting the public can come to the Park Board and make comments. The most difficult part of this process is to make it clear to the public this is a plan —it is not a funding document. Just because there is a plan in place, it does not mean anything will be funded. Pollard didn't know how many grants could be attained but it could be $3.8 to $5.6 million plus the contribution. He added this up to $4,365 or $10+ million. If a match is required, there is $2.5 that must be come out of millage funding. Before we have even arrived at the year, that millage funding is earmarked. He noted 85% of this is earmarked for the River Trail. Dorland stated he clearly understands Pollard's comments. He did point out this is a planning document —it is not an implementation or budgetary document. If a project is to be forwarded for the grant process, it is required to come back to the Park Board and the City Council before a grant can be pursued. This gives another opportunity for comment as to whether it is a viable project. Reickel noted again that the River Trail is emphasized on the potential grant list because the criteria that we must meet for the grants rate high on water, fishing and natural areas. We will C.45 Park Board Minutes - October 27, 1999 Page 3 not get five of these over a ten year period let alone get all of them. This is just a component of the overall plan. In the CIP there is a different approach which deals with the local neighborhood parks more than ever before. Pollard noted Council policy states upcoming millage projects must be in the master plan. Howard notes that state funding can designate what is done. Pollard stressed that because we are driven by funding sources, the River Trail is where the millage money is being spent. What happens here, is that the only thing that qualifies is trails, so we end up building trails. James commented that the River Trail is unique as there are so many different users and so many different ways it is used in so many different parts of the community. It allows us to get close to the river,'it allows passive and active use; it links neighborhoods, there are plans to link parks and other parts of the city in a safe way. We didn't have a way to ride to East Lansing all these years, now we will on skates, foot and bikes. This is a capital improvement that we have invested in and it is also something all generations use. C.46 PARK BOARD MASTER PLAN WORK SESSION TUESDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1999 FOSTER COMMUNITY CENTER, 200 N. FOSTER, ROOM 205 SESSION BEGINS AT 5:00 P.M. The following is being provided for Park Board review and comment. Proofreading comments are welcome! Calendar Additional Status Reports from 1995-2000 Master Plan DNR Checklist Introduction Community Administrative Structure Planning Process Focus Group Reports and Correspondence Operational Program Needs List Infrastructure Project List C.47 B FIVE YEAR PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT MASTER PLAN PARK BOARD WORKING SESSION (October 26 and 27, 1999) Park Board attendees: Mary James, President _ Robert Brockwell, Vice-president Ronald Lott Focus Group Representation: COMMITTEE: Access Aquatics Athletic Facilities (Park/School) & Programs Cemeteries (Lansing Municipal) Community Centers & Senior Citizens Cultural Arts and Historical Downtown Parks Forestry (Street and Park) Golf Operations (Lansing Municipal) Infrastructure (Park & Recreation System) Natural Areas Neighborhood and City Wide Parks Neighborhood Park Programs Oak Park Maintenance Complex Potter Park and Zoo Regional Recreation Scott Art & Garden Washington Park Ice Skating Complex Judith Mohay Filice Ruth Leyrer John Pollard REPRESENTED BY: Not available Mary Winegar Tony Noyola Carol Abbott Not available Elizabeth Homer Robert Ford Paul Dykema Don Ballard Phil Dorland Clara Bratton Phil Dorland Murdock Jemerson Phil Dorland Not available Robert Ford Alice Atkin and Sam Pardee Don Ballard The Park Board listened to focus group summaries from the group's representative, asked questions and responded with the following additional items to be considered in the action plan: Access- No additional items suggested for the plan document. Acquisitions and Disposal of land - Recommend that the City not tamper with the green belt along the Grand River. This would be in keeping with the 1922, Harland Bartholomew, Comprehensive City Plan for Lansing. Aquatics- No additional items suggested for the plan document. C.48 Athletic Facilities (Park/School) & Programs - The Lansing School District does not properly maintain its athletic facilities. Outdoor facilities in particular are in disrepair. The City needs to address this with the Lansing School District. Our programs are being judged by the facilities they provide us. Tennis programs/facilities are not available at the schools, hence kids are not learning the sport. The Parks and Recreation Department needs to develop a marketing program to assure that the athletic facilities are left in a cleaner state after the program is finished than it was when the users arrived. This can become part of the coaches responsibilities by letter notification in preliminary packet. Develop a form coaches submit to umpire for signature which states the area has been picked up. If it is not, they forfeit the game. Ensure trash containers are on site in reasonable locations. Cemeteries (Lansing Municipal)- No additional items suggested for the plan document. Community Centers & Senior Citizens- No additional items suggested for the plan document regarding Community Centers. The Board did note that a separate senior citizens report is not being provided in this report. Following the 2000 census senior citizen program needs need to be reevaluated by the City in relationship to the senior population and the programs that will benefit this segment of the population. Cultural Arts and Historical - Suggest development of junior docent programs. Downtown Parks - Additional avenues need to be explored to improve maintenance levels. Amenities placed in the parks by other agencies/organizations need to receive appropriate maintenance. The Board of Water and Light's Planet Walk gets vandalized and needs to be repaired in a more timely fashion. Forestry (Street and Park)- No additional items suggested for the plan document. Golf Operations (Lansing Municipal) - Golf capital projects need to be incorporated into the next millage proposal. Infrastructure (Park & Recreation System) - Address access for children across major streets like Business 27 on the north end. C.49 Address developing the hiking/biking path from Moores Park to Grand River Park, then along Lansing Road to Waverly Road and back to Moores Park along Moores River Drive. This will create a looping terminus at the west end like it is at the east end from Kalamazoo, to Clippert and back to Michigan Avenue. Natural Areas- No additional items suggested for the plan document. Neighborhood and City Wide Parks- -- Include soccer fields at St. Joe Park. Naturalization of parks is the wave of the future and needs to addressed. Support facilities such as restrooms need to be available for the park users. This includes having the facilities open to the public and in good repair. Neighborhood Park Programs - Need more concentration on developing youth and teen programs. The City needs to expand on the Adopt -A -Park program. City staff need to be available to guide and train persons involved in the program. Funding needs to be put in place to provide for supplies, tools, water etc. Oak Park Maintenance Complex- No additional items suggested for the plan document. Potter Park and Zoo- No additional items suggested for the plan document Regional Recreation- No additional items suggested for the plan document. Scott Art & Garden - Incorporate concepts to involve volunteers and the labor unions to undertake improvements. Using the facility as a "Welcome Center" was being considered previously and should not be dropped from consideration. Washington Park Ice Skating Complex - Transportation needs to be provided to assist the schools in getting the kids to the skating complex. C.50 n. today, Agency Ut- 425 W. Grand River runty Board of Commission- mce Committee, 7 p.m. luman Services g, 5303 S. Cedar St., in Township discussion: Township is Matt Larsen and Jeff ulian discuss The Ur - vice Boundary with itor Eleanor Luecke, nt of the Liaison for In- ghborhood Coopera- a segment of "Merid- spectives" called he Line" at 7 p.m. to - ;I Cable of East Lan- d Meridian Township Channel 30).. ien: Meridian Farmers ,8 a.m. to 6 p.m. today, i behi '.ian pal Bi 151 Road. u, amissioi oday, pal Bc .51 Road, own Township (anted: Watertown - up Parks and Recrea- partment's seventh Wacousta Holiday Craft ) a.m. to 3 p.m. Nov. rmation and registra- craft booth: 626- 669-9200, Ext. 202. ;ommission: 7 p.m. to- wnship Hall, 12803 S. ;ta Road, Grand Taff writer Hugh our news ar is a free service to ders. To have your sted: or bring it to Calen- ising State Journal, 120 -no It T ancina MT most. "I take everything to heart. You take a lot of verbal abuse. It's really, really tough." But unlike most mid -Michigan communities • this election season, 10 candidates have filed for four at - large openings on Williamston's council. The only other tri-county city. election ballot that even comes close is Potterville, with eight candi- dates for four seats. In Williamston's 1997 election, only four people ran for four seats in a town where officials used to com- plain that no one paid attention to the council. This year, the tiny chamber often called Williamston Involved Now, or WIN, formed over a r--,T)osed Aldi Inc. grocery warel: two years ago, still is a voico ,n city. debates. Two council candidates — Steve Shaw and Kenneth Zichi — are WIN members and a third, William Schall is married to WIN member Melanie Schall. "I feel compelled to run. There needs to be some changes in our town," said Shaw, who's never run for office. Potterville's a puzzle, however: Eight candidates will fight for four seats on the City Council even though no controversy's ,stirring souls there. ■ John Ewen Mayor., 2-year term: ■ Dave Brown (incumbent) ■ Dave Powers Ballot proposal: to lease 534- foot land stdp•to Eaton County Fair Eaton*Rapids Three seats, 4-year terms: Precinct 1:. (Thomas Norris (incumbent) ■ Terri Lee Schmidt Precinct 2: ■ Claudia Brown, (incumbent) ■ Jeremy Whittum• Precinct 3: •Valerie Kunkel ■ Nanoall Smith (incumbent) ■ Michael Spoelstra Mayor, 2-year term: ■ Michael Judd (incum. Potterville Four seats, top three voter -get- ters win 4-year terms and fourth wins 2-year term: ■ Dennis Carroll ■ Patricia Doxsie ■ Julia Hammond ■ Rick McDonald ■ Howard•Misener Sr. ■ Sue Norris ■ Kathy Parker ■ Peter Schlitz wimai Four se ters win highest ■ Rolc ■ Hed ■ Dan ■ Johl ■ Thoi ■ Geo ■ Willi ■ Stex ■B.A ■ Ken LOJ16)ng Sizt� Jcvr)'' 4,, lo(& 1qq , p: 6q Eastside neighbors- group seeks ideas on December hou( The Eastside Neighborhood Or- ganization wants input for the plan- mng of the December holiday party. The monthly membership meet- ing is scheduled for 7 p.m. today at the Foster Community Center. For more information call Rick Kibbey at 485-1154. Training to start Presidents Plus One Neighbor- hood Leadership Development Training for Eastside residents starts Oct. 14 and will continue ev- ery Thursday through Nov. 11. Park input needed The Department of Parks and Re- creation is asking neighborhood peo ple to answer five questions to help Alma: Local artist's work displayed Jennifer Fish of Alma, a senior drt and design major at Alma College, has four artworks on display at the. fourth all -female show at the Leslie - Lohman Gay Art Foundation in SoHo, New York City. She submitted six cartoons for con. sideration and four were accepted. Cheryl Risner In the Neighborhood develop the city's recreation plan. The city is required to create the plan to qualify for state recreation matching grant money. I The questions are: ■What city park(s) do you, use? ■ What are the three most criti- cdl problems with! neighborhood parks? Applications and descriptions of duties are available from the cityty clerk and from the City Council of- fice at City'Hall, 410 Abbott Road. Information. is also available at www.cLeast-lansing.mi.us on the ,Internet. Go to City Government, then City Boards and Commissions. Appplication deadline is 5 p.m. Oct. 25. Appointments will be made in late December. A separate appli- ■ What new playground equip- ment or support amenities (res- trooms, drinking fountains, bike racks etc.) do you see as a need and in which park? ■ What new programs do you think we need in our city parks? ■ Do,you feel safe in a city park? Please send or drop responses to Lansing Parks and Recreation, Neighborhoods Parks' Committee, 318 N. Capitol Ave., Lansing, MI 48933. Response deadline is Oct.15. For more information call Tonya Moore. at 483-4282. Walk to help garden - The 23rd annual Greater Lansing CROP Walk will be held Sunday start- ing at Dwight Rich Middle School. Across Mid -Michigan East Lansing Recreation and Arts, Seniors Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals, one each. Grand Ledge: Fall, colors displayed - You can look at the fall colors from a riverboat, an airplane, a heli- copter or a horse-drawn wagon dur- ing the 20th annual Color Cruise The event, sponsored by Church 'World Service, helps raise money to provide food, medical care, disaster relief, and self-help development as- sistance to needy people throughout the world. Home tour set Lansing's West Side homeowners will open their doors for: the 5th Westsrde Home Tour from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. Oct. 17. The neighborhood; one of Lansing's oldest, is located west of Martin Luther King Jr. Bou- levard and south of Saginaw Street. The tour includes 10 homes of dis- tinct character. Houses on the tour are of diverse architectural styles and the interiors reflect the style of the homeowners. cle rides are $2 for adults and $1 for children and seniors all three days. Airplane and helicopter rides will be available Saturday and Sunday only. There also will be pioneer crafts, demonstrations and displays; musical entertainment; a petting zoo and a dis- play of old cars and farm equipment. Admission is $1 for adults and 25 cents for children 5 to 12 years old PARK BOARD AGENDA September 22, 1999 BOARD MEMBERS: Judith Mohay Filice, Robert Brockwell, Wilbur Howard, Mary James, Ruth Leyrer, Kris Nicholoff, John Pollard CALL'TO ORDER: 7:00 P.M. Gier Center, 2406 Hall St.- 1. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA 2. STATEMENTS OF CITIZENS The public may address the Board on non -agenda items. Comments should be limited to _ three minutes on any single item. The public may also address the Board on agenda items after the presentation of the item and the Park Board members' questions have been answered. 3. PRESENTATION by the National Bicycle League/BMX Gier Park 4. BOARD MEETING MINUTES * A. August 25, 1999 Park Board Minutes B. Receive- Other Department Board Meeting Minutes 5. OLD BUSINESS * A. Election of Officers 6. NEW BUSINESS * A. Grant Amendments - River Trail West B. Parks & Recreation Five Year Master Plan 1) Plan Schedule 2) 2000-2005 Committees & Chairs * 3) Date for Saturday Work Session * 4) Review & Comment - Park Master Plan Priority Guidelines 5) Review Committee Reports Regarding 1995-2000 Completed Priorities C. Budget FY 2001 1) Review of Conceptual Budget Changes/Additions * 2) Establish Park Board Priority Suggestions for Mayor's FY 2001 Budget 3) Budget Calendar 7. DIRECTOR'S REPORT A. Retirement B. Project Play Status C. Ranney Park Update D. Skate Board Exhibition/Park Update E. Moores Basketball Court Follow-up 8. INFORMATION A. Letter from Senator Dianne Byrum B. Commendation to Golf Course Staff - Pollution Prevention C. Friends of Turner Dodge - Mystery Dinner D. Turner Dodge Family Christmas E. Apple Butter Festival - Fenner - October 16 & 17 9. REMARKS BY BOARD MEMBERS * REQUIRES BOARD ACTION C.52 Excerpt Dealing with Master Plan PARK BOARD MINUTES SEPTEMBER 229 1999 MEMBERS PRESENT: Judith Mohay Filice, Robert Brockwell, Wilbur Howard, Mary James, Ruth Leyrer, Ron Lott (excused late arrival at 8:30), John Pollard MEMBERS ABSENT: Kris Nicholoff (excused) OTHERS PRESENT: Greater Lansing Shuffleboard Club - Jack Murphy, Casey Moubray, Earl Burley Lansing Boat Club - Jim Hepfer, Fred Adams, Betty Bublitz Gier.AdvisoryBoard - Claude Ramey,. Roberta & Brad.Streeterponna Peterman National Bicycle League - Carolyn Mundt BMX - Brian & Debbie Haught, David & Margaret Cary, Jeneva Cary, Jonathan Cary, Rob & , Kitty Cronk, Josh Bender, Heather McKenzie, Dan Lienerth, Olivia & Danny Hendy, Steve Ross, Brenda Hanford, Brandon Hanford, Jason Hanford, Jeffrey Schmits, Brandon Shand, Laura Zapoli, Lisa Kapinski, Jon Greene, Cory Daggott, Jose & C.J. Colon, Ben Cary, Kasey & Kyle Streeter Skateboards - Jeremy Blacvie Did not list group or area of interest - Jo Hacker, June Knostman, Floyd D. Wright, Peter C. Sullivan, John H. Bublitz, Chris & Bryan Maltby, John Nash, Peter O'Mally, Sal Durso, Linda Montalvo, Ronald Cronk, Adria Libolt, Karen DeVme, Gloria Rozeboom, Kristin Sullivan, Luke Schafer, Norrene O'Malley, Patrick Mitchell, Joyce & James Blair, Pete Bosheff DeRartment Staff - R. Eric Reickel, Director; Phil Dorland, Deputy Director; Murdock Jemerson, Leisure Services Manager CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 P.M. Gier Community Center, 2400 Hall Street PARKS AND RECREATION FIVE YEAR MASTER PLAN Phil Dorland explained the department is in the process of updating the Five Year Master Plan which is primarily used to apply for MDNR grants. It is also used to assist us in determining what capital improvement projects to advance to the Mayor and Council in the budget process for the next fiscal year. A timetable was included with the packet along with the past and current committees. After discussion, the Board decided to hold a separate work session on Tuesday. October 26 at 5:00 P.M. at Foster Community Center. The regular Park Board meeting will be Wednesday, October 27 at 7:00 P.M. at Letts Community Center. What is not completed on Tuesday will be finished at the regular meeting on Wednesday. Park Master Plan Priority Guidelines were adopted and modified from the city wide infrastructure priorities adopted by City Council with the 1994-1995 budget. Pollard wondered what the difference was in the City Charter regarding sale of property and the 1979 policy. He was quite concerned that this would allow park land to be sold without a vote of the people. He is concerned that Council could undedicate park land. Dorland explained the Charter was adopted in 1978. Following that Council adopted an ordinance regarding acquisition and disposal of land to be consistent with the City Charter. As C.53 Park Board Minutes - September 22, 1999 Page 2 part of that, Council also adopted the Policy on Park Acquisition and Development Policy on December 10, 1979. This was consistent with the recommendation from the Park Board of that time. The ordinance and policy will be provided at the next meeting. The City Council has the authority to amend ordinances and policies. The electorate can change the Charter. James asked about the Park Board policy on disposal of land. Dorland explained that the Board did look at some parcels during the last review of the plan and considered them for disposal. Pollard had heard Councilmember Adado request the Director to look at park land and determine which ones we need and which ones we don't. Pollard feels the quickest way to get off City Council is to mess with the people's parks —the City of Lansing designated parks. James pointed out the Board had not received Jemerson's complete report on the completed priorities. This will be rectified. Dorland explained there will be Goal, Deficiency and Need Statements presented at the next Board meeting. A preliminary listing of projects will also be provided. James asked for these in advance. C.54 APPENDIX D OTHER PLANS REFERENCED OTHER PARK/FACILITY PLANS REFERENCED The following plans have been reference in various sections of the Park and Recreation Five Year Master Plan. These plans are available for review at the Parks and Recreation Department's Administrative Offices, 318 N. Capital Avenue, Lansing, MI 48933-1206. Community Center Renovation Plan by Freeman, Smith & Associates, Inc., 5/22/96 & 6/14/96 Crego Park Master Plan by M.C. Smith & Associates, 11/78 Crego Park Development Master Plan by Victor R. Nelhiebel Site Design & Presentation, 2/86 Demographic Study of 1995 Recreation Plan by Don Hamilton, 1995 Fenner Arboretum Master Plan by JJR, 12/95 Ferris Park Preliminary Land Use Study by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., 12/89 (Garage) Operations and Facility Assessment Study (draft) by David M. Griffith & Associates and HNTB Corporation, 5/2/97 Urban Forestry Master Plan and Operations Review by Davey Resource Group, 6/98 Groesbeck Golf Course Remodeling Master Plan by Matthews and Associates, P.C., 4/9/90 City of Lansing Master Plan, City of Lansing Planning and Neighborhood Development Department Plan for Development of Lansing's Waterfront, City of Lansing Planning and Neighborhood Development Department Moores Park Renovation Master Plan by Pollack Design Associates, 12/2/91 Potter Park Zoo Master Plan by McFadzean Everly Associates, 7/95 Ranney Park Revenue -Generating Facilities Study by William L. Haralson & Associates, Inc., 7/92 Reutter Master Plan Concept by Linsemier & Associates, P.C., 12/7/89 River Trail Sign Master Plan by Robert Ford & Associates, Inc., 4/15/91 Scott Center - Renovations of by Architects Four, Inc., 12/20/96 D.1 Southside Community Center, Preliminary Design for by Hobbs + Black Associates, Inc., Capital Consultants Engineers and Community Planning Services, 1/15/96 Turner Dodge House - Preservation Master Plan by Ralph Calder and Associates, Inc., 3/93 Waverly Hills Golf Course by Matthews and Associates, P.C., 4/9/90 a D.2 APPENDIX E MASTER PROJECT LIST MASTER PROJECT LIST Interpreting and Using the Master Project List The "Master Project List" was developed with input from various focus group committees and Parks and Recreation Department staff. The list was in draft form and was modified throughout the public meeting and hearing process associated with the Parks and Recreation Five Year Master Plan. Each year the list will be used to identify capital improvement projects (a project costing $15,000 or more with a useful life of 10 years or more) for the Mayor's annual budget recommendation to City Council. Identification of projects is done in relationship to City Council budgetary priorities and the fiscal latitude provided the department based on revenue projections for any given fiscal year. Column descriptions: Site locations are listed in alphabetical order. Projects identified to date are listed for each site. Projects have been ranked by staff utilizing the Park and Recreation Master Plan Priority Guidelines following on E.2-3. Note: priorities can change when more detailed information is received and/or site conditions change. The first priority ranking relates to the main priority from the guidelines. (Eg: a priority ranking of "I" relates to projects deemed to be Pre-emptive or "Y relates to projects that are strategic investments.) The second priority ranking relates to a subcategory of the first priority ranking. (Eg: a priority ranking of "3" with a subcategory of "H" relates to a removal/elimination of a facility or park amenity that gets little use. Oversight relates to the section of a City Department that we feel has the responsibility to initiate the work when and if necessary budgetary appropriations are put in place. (Eg: "O" stands for Operations and Maintenance in the Public Service Department.) Estimates based on 1999 dollars are preliminary cost planning numbers established in funding ranges. (Eg: "C" stands for a project estimated to cost $15,000 up to $49,999.) (Note: projects with an estimated cost of $15,000 or more are subject to the city's Capital Improvements Process.) Note: If a first priority ranking of"10" appears, it means that the item is for informational purposes 'or that design staff need to further evaluate the project. If an "X" appears in a column, it is placed there to fill the space so as not to confuse the computer with a blank space when sorting information. E.1 PARK AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN PRIORITY GUIDELINES (adopted and modified from the City Wide Infrastructure Priorities) 1. Pre-emptive Projects/Programs A. Correction to imminent threats to employee or public health and safety for which failure to take remedial action within the ensuing year could result in a high probability of significant liability. B. Project/Program activities which are legally required by Federal or State Law or regulation and for which the City has been determined to be in noncompliance by the overseeing body; and for which significant liability or sanction may be imposed. C. Correction to a recognized hazard or to imminent threats which may result in significant damage to person or property and for which failure to take remedial action within the ensuing year could result in a high probability of significant liability. D. Failure or damage to existing infrastructure, or technological obsolescence, which may result in inability to provide, or substantial diminution of essential citywide basic services. 2. Projects which are necessary to maintain basic citywide infrastructure at existing service levels. (Keep things from getting worse.) 3. Strategic investment to: A. Maintain or increase the City's economic base. This category may include programs that improve the business climate or where it can be demonstrated that the program will provide sufficient public interest to keep Lansing residents living in the corporate limits or attract people to move into the corporate limits. B. Maintain or increase available revenue within the ensuing five year cycle in excess of costs. C. Restrain or reduce operating costs within the ensuing five year cycle in excess of costs. D. Take advantage of available grant or other non -City funding to accomplish projects which would need to be undertaken in the ensuing five year cycle to maintain basic service levels and which would not substantially increase operating costs. E. Prevent the need for significantly greater expenditure at a future date within the ensuing five year cycle. F. Improve the productivity of City employees in the delivery of essential City basic services. G. Acquisition or disposal of land consistent with the December 10, 1979 Council policy on Park Land Acquisition and Development. H. Removal/elimination of a facility or park amenity that gets little use. 4. Projects/Programs directed at restoring basic citywide infrastructure or services to an acceptable standard to remedy past under funding. 5. Projects/Programs which support improved service levels to City neighborhoods and/or residents. E.2 6. Projects/Programs directed at improving basic citywide infrastructure or services to provide improved service level and which include revenue streams which substantially cover increases in operating costs. 7. Projects/Programs directed at maintenance and improvement of facilities supporting ancillary services which are used by a limited number of individuals on a substantially self-supporting basis. 8. Projects/Programs directed at improving basic citywide infrastructure or services to provide an increased service level which will result in significantly higher operating costs, without supporting revenue. 9. Projects/Programs directed at maintenance and improvement of facilities supporting ancillary or discretionary activities which are utilized by a limited number ofpeople without supporting revenue. 10. Information place mark. Project Oversight Projects/Programs referred to a specific Department/Division or Section to provide project oversight from planning to implementing. Projects/Programs are prioritized within the Department/Division or Section. A. Administration (Parks & Recreation Department) B. Building Maintenance (Management Services Department) G. Grounds & Landscape Maintenance (Parks & Recreation Department) F. Forestry (Parks & Recreation Department) L. Leisure & Special Recreation Services (Parks & Recreation Department) O. Operations & Maintenance (Public Services Department) P. Park Design & Research (Parks & Recreation Department) Z. Potter Park Zoo (Parks & Recreation Department) Funding Ranges A. Up to $6,999 (not included in this master project listing) B. $7,000 up to $14,999 (not included in this master project listing) C. $15,000 up to $49,999 D. $50,000 up to $99,999 E. $100,000 up to $249,999 F. $250,000up to $499,000 G. $500,000 up to $999,999 H. $1,000,000 > X. Place mark E.3 t�1 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT PARKS FIVE YEAR MASTER PLAN (0310112000 thru 02/2812005) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PULLED FROM MASTER LIST SORTED BY PARK & PRIORITY RANKING LOCATION PROJECT Priority Second Alpha code Alpha code RankIna Ranking Est based converted to --_ �_ on 1999 $ midmngo of $ 119TH ARMORY_ ACQUISITIONS _ improve soocerfield with drainage _ - _ _ 5 X C 32,500 acquisition of river frontage-125_C_ottage Court 3 G C 32,500 ADADO /RIVERFRONT/TRAIL a" Spring St.- reroute trail off of street. Gain easement from S & S Dye and construct new sectlon-TrL - ---- ---- - _ 1 C G 750,000 ADADO /RIVERFRONT/TRAIL replace posts & decking on board walk along the S. Grand Parking Garage 2 3 3 X G G -- D E E__ 75,000 175,000 175,000 ADADO /RIVERFRONT/TRAIL _ _ locate of trail from PPZ to Hawk Island County Park ADADO /RIVERFRONT/TRAIL _ro_ute acquire BWL property- north leg _ _ ADADO /RIVERFRONT/TRAIL _- acquire/easements south of Hawk Island County Park to Hope Sorer Complex 3 G E_ 175,000 ADADO /RIVERFRONT/TRAIL ADADO /RIVERFRONT/TRAIL acquire Con rail R.O.W. - north leg _ _ 3 4 G X _ _ E _ C 175,000 32,500 add to numbers of and replace trash receptacles, benches and tables ADADO /RIVERFRONT/TRAIL _ implement lighting needs a" the trail (BWL) 5 8 8 X X X D _ H F -_ 75,000 2,000,000 374,500 ADADO /RIVERFRONT/TRAIL develop from Potter Park to Hawk Island County Park ADADO /RIVERFRONT/TRAIL ADADO /RIVERFRONT/fRAIL ADADO /RIVERFRONT/TRAIL _ _ develop leg from_Shiawassee St. to MI Ave. (Ottawa Power Plant & Wentworth Park) _ develop. Moores Park to Grand River Park leg develop trail from Moores pool to west parking lot _ _ _ develop from MI AHillve. to Cherry Park lei ___ ____ river trail paving and decking repairs schedule annually) _ 8 X - H 21000.000 8 X E_ 175,000 _ _ ADADO /RIVERFRONT/TRAIL _ ADADO /RIVERFRONT/TRAIL-E _ ADADO_/RIVERTRAI _FRONT/L-_E • ADADO /RIVERFRONT/TRAIL-E _ _ 8 X _ E 175,000 75,000 _ 1 C D - move tennis courts south and establish parking area and connect all to ADA walkway replace tte boardwalk by the playground (in rough condition) _ 2 X D -_ 75,000 _ 2 _ X _ C 32,500 ADADO /RIV_ER_FRONT/TRAIL-E ADADO /RIVERFRONT/TRAIL-RR_ ADADO /RIVERFRONT/TRAIL-W _ ADADO /RIVERFRONT/TRAIL-W parking by Saginaw hwy. and Oakland need resurfacing_ obtain propeq rlqhts and make trestle repairs and improvements to old RR right of way 2 X_ C 32,500 2 X G 750,000 walkway paving and brick repairs(trip hazards) complete Mstr. plan to provide direction 2 5 X X C C 32,500 32,500 develop new master plan in conjunction w/Music Fast ADADO /RIVERFRONT/TRAIL-W !E Iement master plan (likely to include a performance stage) 8 2 2 X X X F _ C _ C 374,500 32,500 32,500 ATTW_OOD - - w replace playground equipment south end) in compliance with ASTM & CPSC guidelines BANCROFT re lace playground equipment in compliance with ASTM & CPSC guidelnes (CDBGZ BANCROFT renovate/replace restroom building _ 2 2 X X _ E D 175,000 75,000 BURCHNRD-E_ _ r_eplace the retaining walls BUR_C_HARD-E_ railings need painting 2 X C 32,5W BURCHARD-W_ _ replace entire damaged walkways -trip hazard _ 1 C C 32,500 BURCHARD-W _ replace iron fencing and retaining wall along the river _ 2 X F 374,500 CAVANAUGH sidewalk repairs needed (City & school) _ 1 C _ C 32,500 CEMETERY-OFFICEAWNT COMPL correct parking so it has proper handicap accessibility remove 15 inch wide concrete along front curb 1 B C 32,500 CEMETERY-OFFICE/MA1NT COMPL__ repave back parking lot 2_ 1 _ ` X_ -C C _ D _ 32,500 75,000 CHERRY HILL _ - _ Cherry Hill launch & dock (Feb. 2000 Fisheries Grant request) CHERRY HILL _ reface playground equipment in compliance with ASTM &_CPSC guidelines 2 X C CHERRY HILL Cherry Hill parking lot (Feb 2000 Fisheries Grant request) -- - 4 _ _ X _ C _32,500 32,5W _ COMSTOCK _ _ _ make restrooms accessible -hold until it is known ff the facility isgoing to be used - - - 1 _ B C 32,500 COMSTOCK - - repave parking lots, sign and line 2 - --- X --- C 32,500 COOLEY stairway to basement needs to be replaced 2 X X r X "-` - --- X C 32,500 COOLEY _-_ - fencing around the garden needs to be replaced 4 8 -� - 13 - C 32,5W COOLEY -- --- COOLEY - - - -- -- - - buses can not make the turn within the turning radius in the parking lot D 75,000 river trail access ---- - - - �-- G 750,000 02/11/2000 PkPIan2000-2W5.123 r In PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT PARKS FIVE YEAR MASTER PLAN (0310112000 thru 02/28/2005) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PULLED FROM MASTER LIST SORTED BY PARK & PRIORITY RANKING LOCATION PROJECT Priori Second Alpha code Alpha code Ranking Ranking Est. based converted to CREGO fence replacement/repairs needed 4 X on 1999 $ D midrange of $ 75,000 CREGO _ up date master plan _ 5 X C 32,500 DAVIS, BENJAMIN F. replace softball field lighting on existing two fields 2 X E 175,000 DAVIS, BENJAMIN F. _ replace tennis courts _ _ _ 2 X D 75,000 DAVIS, BENJAMIN F. repave parking lots w/curbs 4 X E 175,000 DAVIS, BENJAMIN F. provide portable bleachers at Jr. fields. 5 X C 32,500 DAVIS, BENJAMIN F. add third softball field _^ 8 X E 175,000 DAVIS, BENJAMIN F. irrigate ball fields _ 8 X C 32,500 DAVIS, BENJAMIN F. construct new restroom/concession building 8 X G 750,000 DAVIS, BENJAMIN F. _ basketball courts- add more 8 X D 75,000 DIETRICH repave parking lot, sign` 5 X C 32,500 DURANT _ trip hazard -replace damaged park walkways 1 C C 32,500 DURANT _ EDMORE _ ELM _ _Durant Park redevelopment eer master plan 8 2 _ 2 X X X E _ C C 175,000 32,500 32,500 _ _ _ replace playground equipment in compliance with ASTM_& CPSC guidelines _ _ replace basketball court _ _ _ _ i replace basketball court _ ELMHURST 2 X C 32,500 ELMHURST replace playground equipment in compliance with ASTM & CPSC guidelines 2 X C 32,500 EV_ERETT _ i_ _- _ improve parking _ 4 X C 32,500 EVERETT make field improvements such as irrigation 8 2 X X C C 32,500 32,500 EVERGREEN CEMETERY _ replace fence along Mt. Hope EVERGREEN CEMETERY roads good now but in five gears will need repairs ^_ _ 2 X C 32,500 EVERGREEN CEMETERY - replace gate (still does not work right) 2 X C 32,500 EVERGREEN CEMETERY _ section P needs road around it _ 7 7 2 X X X D C D _ 75,000 _ 32,500 75,000 EVERGREEN CEMETERY develop section P (survey boundaries, lot markers & water needed) FENNER _ _ replace perimeter fencing around the park FENNER 2500 E. Mt. Hope building demolition _ 3 H D 75.000 FENNER _ bring Bison display entrance road off from Aurelius 8 X C _ 32,500 FENNER _ group camp entrance off Mt. Hope (property acquired from Curtiss) 8 X _ C 32,500 FENNER _ connect to River trail 8 X D 75,000 FENNER install a board walk through the marsh trail _ 8_ X _ C 32,500 FERRIS install park amenidities per master plan _ 2 X E 175,000 FERRIS _ add new walkway from SW to old NW comer & replace existing walks _ 4 X C 32,500 FERRIS install tennis courts 5 X C 32,500 FOREST VIEW _ _ _ tennis court replacement _ 2 X _ C 32,500 FOSTER _ renovate the building _ 5 X _ C 32.500 FOSTER C. C. _ _ repaint interior of center in five years 2� X _ D 75,000 FOSTER C. C. _ upgrade electrical service to meeting rooms _ perimeter of gardens needs to be replanted and fenced with wrought iron 5 _ 2 X C 32,500 FRANCES _ X X _ D D _ 75,000 75,000 FRANCES _parking areas will need resurfacing in 5 years 2 FRANCES _ some concrete walks will need replacing in 5 years 2 X C 32,500 FRANCES _ _ u _ construct patio area outside of pavilion on the north side X X E _ D 175,000 75,000 PRANCES _ add parking for large group uses of pavilion _ f _ _8 r 02/11/2000 PkPlan2000-2005.123 rn PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT PARKS FIVE YEAR MASTER PLAN (0310112000 thru 02/2812005) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PULLED FROM MASTER LIST SORTED BY PARK & PRIORITY RANKING LOCATION PROJECT Priority Second Alpha code Alpha code Ranking Ranking Est. based converted to on 1999 $ midrange of $ FRANCES the soccer fields for drainage & regrade field - 8 X F 374,500 _ _ FRANCES - connect Moores River Dr. walk into Frances Park 8 X C 32,500 FULTON develop soccer fieldw/bleachers 8 X C 32,500 _ - GIER _- -v _ implement a preventative Maint. plan for ball field lighting 1 C C 32,500 GIER - re lace playground equipment (north end) in com liance with ASTM & CPSC guidelines 2 X C 32,500 GIER fence on north end needs replacing 2 X C 32,500 - GIER _ _ _ _ arkin Lot Repairs needed. -__ 2 X C 32,500 GIER --_ _ park pavilion 8 X C 32,500 GIER _ replace score sheds with score tower _ 9 X E 175,000 GIER C.C. -----,repaint interior of center in five years 2 X C 32,500 GRAND RIVER_ _ _ GRAND RIVER - - _--- - _GRAND RIVER _need GRAVES - GROESBECK GOLF COURSE GROESBECK GOLF COURSE - GROESBECK GOLF COURSE GROESBECK GOLF COURSE _- river bank erosion being caused by the wake___ _ 1 C F 374,500 repave park road from Lansing Rd. to new parking lot cuffing along road to control cars parking on the grass _- replace basket ball court #2 green, 3 tee safety issue _ _#3 green- retaining wall & cart path replacement _-_ _ develop golf leaminq_center/practice facility pave outer parking lot - 2 X C 32,500 � 7 X C 32,500 1 C C 32,500 _ 2 X C 32,500 3 E _ C 32,500 6 X F 374,500 75,000 6 X _ D GROESBECK GOLF_ COURSE HILLSDALE �- make main entrance off Grand River _ 7 X _ H -_ 2,000,000 replace -playground equipment in compliance with ASTM & CPSC guidelines � 2 X C_ 32,500 HOLLY replace _playground equipment in compliance with ASTM & CPSC guidelines 2 2 X X C C 32,500 32,500 HORSEBROOK replace playground equipment in compliance with ASTM & CPSC guidelines HULL COURT replace play ground equipment in compliance with ASTM & CPSC guidelines 2 X C_- 32,500 HUNTER pool -add stair or ramp access into the pool 1 B C 32,500 HUNTER pool -replace toilet partitions for ADA compliance 1 B C 32,500 HUNTER add additional basketball courts 5 X C 32,500 HUNTERpool-install slip resistant ceramic tile on floors 1 C D 75,000 HUNTER pool replace pool liner 2 X D 75,000 HUNTER replace pool filters with sand filters 2 X _ _ D 75.000 HUNTER basketball court needs aprons 5 X C 32,500 HUNTER develop park/pool master plan to guide future improvement needs 5 X _ C - 32,500 HUNTER develop a water park 8 X H 2,000,000 HUNTER expand parking on Clifford St. for pool users 9 X D 75,000 HUNTER pool -expand fenced in area to include sand volley ball and seating (sunny and shady) 9 X C 32,500 HUNTERpool-expand or eliminate ba�ypool area to include new water features that are zero depth entry- _ 9 X _ C _ 32,500 HUNTER pool -install water slide _ 9 X C 32,500 HUNTER pool -expand deck and install concession building 9 X E 175,000_ HUNTER pool -install underwater lighting to increase night use of the pool - 9 X C 32,500 JONES LAKE _ _ replace playground equipment in compliance with ASTM & CPSC guidelines - -_ ^_ 2 X C 32,500 KI_RCHER make dugout ADA accessible 1 2 B X C C 32,500 32,500 KIRCHER - fencing along ball field/ arking lot needs to be replaced KIRCHER _ pave parking lot, sign etc. _T __ - 4 X D 75,000 02/11/2000 PkPlan2000-2005.123 tZI v PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT PARKS FIVE YEAR MASTER PLAN (0310112000 thru 0212812005) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PULLED FROM MASTER LIST SORTED BY PARK & PRIORITY RANKING LOCATION PROJECT Priori Second Alpha code Alpha code Ranking Ranking Est based converted to KIRCHER _ __ LANSING SCHOOL DISTRICT on 1999 $ midrange of $ new restroom/concession building__ 8 X F 374,5 00 Everett baseball field -contribution towards lighting 10 X C 32,500 _ LYONS repaint interior of center in five ears _ 2 X C 32,500 court replacement -2 X C 32,500 MARSCOT , _ _ tennis court replacement 1 C C 32,500 MARSHALL fence replacement 2 X C 32,500 _ _ MARSHALL _ ave parking lot 4 X C 32,500 MCKINCH replace playground equipment in compliance with ASTM & CPSC guidelines 2 X C 32,500 MCKINCH _ possible field office site per plans of the seventies 3 F H 2,000,000 MICHIGAN AVE. improve parking lot and sign 2 X C 32,500 MICHIGAN AVE. combine with Waverly Golf Course master plan improvements 6 X H 2,000,000 MOORES pool -replace ceramic tiles per De_ p_t. o_ f Public Health 1 B C 32,500 MOORES replace basket ball courts 2 X C 32,500 MOORES replace_ playground equipment (east end) in compliance with ASTM & CPSC guidelines pool -replace filter systems - ,- _ _ pool -replace liner 2 X C 32,500 MOORES _ _-- _ 2 X D 75,000 _ MOORES 2 X D 75,000 MOORES _ pookreplace one domestic hot water storage tank _ install fishing piers between the west pk. lot and the pool with additional parking pool -install water slide _ entry arch way needs to be repaired • _ fi roads good now but in five years will need repairs I replace fence N, E & S sides - install water supply by entrance/replace old system 2 X C 32,500 _ MOORES -__- _ 9 X E 175,000 MOORES 9 X C 32,500 MT. HOPE CEMETERY 2 X C 32,500 _ MT. HOPE CEMETERY _ MT. HOPE CEMETERY 2 X C 32,500 2 _ X D 75,000 MT. HOPE CEMETERY _ 4 X D 75,000 MUNN _ widen road, pave road & lots, sign & install parking blocks 4 X C 32,500 NORTH -CEMETERY - road needs resurfacing___ - repair basketball court 2 X C 32,500 OAK 1 C C 32,500 OAK _ _ replace fence _ _Y 2 X C 32,500 OAK replace walkway from the parking to the park 5 � X C 32,500 OAK PARK FIELD OFFICE _ _ garage vehicle exhausts stem 1 A C 32,500 OAK PARK FIELD OFFICE _- replace fencing 2 X C 32,500 OAK PARK FIELD OFFICE _ remodel center and back building for table repair and heated equipment storage 3 F D _ 75,000 OAK PARK FIELD OFFICE develop site plan 3 F C 32,500 OAK PARK FIELD OFFICE _ develop architectural construction drawings 3 F E 175,000 OAK PARK FIELD OFFICE _ _ _ remodel the front building to meet code and to provide for adequate offices, restroo_m_ s and meeting roon 3 F _ F 374,500 OAK PARK FIELD OFFICE property Acq. - along Dorrence 3 G E 175,000 OAK PARK FIELD OFFICE _ - replace parking lots 4 X _ _ D 75,000 OAK PARK FIELD OFFICE _ _ replace fueling station and tanks 4 X C 32,5W OAK PARK FIELD OFFICE _ convert annex to new garage (requires facility expansion) _ 4 X _ G_ 750,000 OAK PARK FIELD OFFICE _ _ - rebuild storage buildings alon�RR tracks after land is purchased and site plan done- - 4 Ix F- -_ 374,500 ORMOND - i replace playground equipment in compliance with ASTM & CPSC guidelines _ - 2 X C- - _ 32,500 OSBORN replace playground equipment in compliance with ASTM &CPSC guidelines - _ 2 X C - 32,500 PLEASANT VIEW _ replace tennis courts (maybe on school property) _ _2- X C_ 32,500 02/11/2000 PkPIan2000-2005.123 r4 00 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT PARKS FIVE YEAR MASTER PLAN (0310112000 thru 0212812005) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PULLED FROM MASTER LIST SORTED BY PARK & PRIORITY RANKING LOCATION PROJECT Priority Second Alpha code Alpha code Ranking Ranking Est based converted to on 1999 $ midrange of; PORTER replace basketball court 1 C C 32,500 _ POTTER PARK2OO _ stripe parking lots 2 X C 32,500 _ POTTER PARK/ZOO_ _ _ _ restoration of roads, parking areas and pathways (annual program) 2 2 X X F D 374.500 75,000 POTTER PARK/ZOO_ Dakin St. bridge renovation _ POTTER PARK/ZOO fencin re air - several exhibits 2 X D 75,000 POTTER PARK/ZOO moated exhibit 2 X H 2,000,000 _ POTTER PARK/ZOO pavilion #2 floor leaks into downstairs - repair 2 X C 32,500 _ POTTER PARKIZOO big barn roof 2 X C 32,500 _ POTTER PARK/ZOO _ _ _ bird house renovation 2 X H 2,000,000 _ POTTER PARK/ZOO sheep island renovation 2 X C 32,500 _ POTTER PARK/ZOO renovation of outdoor aviary = 2 X D 75,000 POTTER PARK/ZOO _ provide ADA_ accessibility_ on the east side_ of the Rhino exhibit 4 X C _ 32,500 _ POTTER PARK/ZOO _ POTTER PARK/ZOO_ POTTER PARK/ZOO POTTER PARK/ZOO bird house sky lights (MS est.) i_ upgrade graphics in zoo __ 4 X _ C _ 32,500 5_ X C 32,500 _ _ quarantine building �8_ X F 374,500 new hay bam 8 X E 175,000 _ POTTER PARK/ZOO _ �^ new si nature exhibit i.e.: lar bears) 8 X H 2,000,000 POTTER PARK/ZOO pave parking lot at pavilion # 1 8 X C 32,500 POTTER PARK/ZOO pave back_service road 8 X C 32,500 POTTER PARK/ZOO animal care facility 8 X F 374,500 _ POTTER PARK/ZOO new amphitheater 8 X D 75,000 _ _ _ PDXSON consider walkway around perimeter of park. Trim woods back. 5 X D 75,000 QUENTIN basket ball court may need to be redone/relocated. Post is gone that neighbor cut off. Complete str. pl 2 X C 32,500 QUENTIN both fields are always wet after rain, drainage needed 5 X C 32,500 _ RANNEY fence needs to be replaced or removed 2 X D 75,000 RANNEY _ _ replace playground equipment in compliance with ASTM & CPSC guidelines _ 2 X C 32,500 RANNEY pave parking lots front lot holds water 4 X D 75,000 RANNEY _ implement 1999 master plan proposals 8 X E 175,000 REASONER replace shelter & restroom bldg. 8 X F 374,500 RED CEDAR GOLF COURSE drainage/ river improvements to reduce flooding 3 B E_ 175,000 RED CEDAR GOLF COURSE develop a land use plan 3 B C 32,500 RED CEDAR GOLF COURSE irrigation improvements & pump station 6 X E 175,000 REOLA replaceplayground equipment in compliance with ASTM & CPSC guidelines 2 X _ C 32,500 REUTTER implement remaining elements of master plan 5 X _ D 75,000 REUTTER install irrigation 8 X 32,500 RISDALE west basketball ct. apron has settled from ct. surface -repair C _C 32,500 RISDALE _ replace gavel lot off Pleasant Grove _1 5 X _C_ C 32,500 SCOTT CENTER mechanical, electrical, plumbing & fire protection as addressed in the master plan 2 2 X X _ D_ _ 75,000 175,000 SCOTT CENTER -upgrade correct structural & outside architectural deficiencies addressed in the maser plan _ SCOTT CENTER SCOTT CENTER _ interior architectural repairs & improvements as addressed in the master plan 2 X __ _E E 175,000 site improvements as addressed in the master plan 8 X __ C 32,500 SCOTT WOODS _ replace small bridge or relocate trail to eliminate bridge _ 1 C C 32,500 02/11/2000 PkPlan2000-2005.123 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT PARKS FIVE YEAR MASTER PLAN (0310112000 thru 0212812005) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PULLED FROM MASTER LIST SORTED BY PARK & PRIORITY RANKING LOCATION PROJECT Priority Second AI ha code Alpha code Ranking Ranking Est based converted to SCOTT WOODS replace playground equipment in compliance with ASTM & CPSC guidelines _ 2 9 X X on 1999 $ C C midrange of $ 32,500 32,5W SCOTT WOODS redo parking lot, need parking barricades & signage ST JOSEPH basket ball court repair ___ 1 C C 32,500 _ ST JOSEPH restroom/concession bldg. reno_ v.(MS est.) 2 X C 32,500 ST JOSEPH__ _ _ _ _ diamon_d #1 fencing - 225 ft. -_ 5 X C 32,500 ST JOSEPH _ tennis ct parking lot floods -need drainage installed 5 X C 32,500 ST JOSEPH diamond #3 fencing 225 ft_ 5 X C 32,500 ST JOSEP_H mond #2 fencing - 225 ft. diamond 5 X C 32,500 _ _ ` STABLER _ _ replace playground equipment in compliance with ASTM & CPSC guidelines install irrigation system 2 X C 32,500 SYCAMORE • 2 X C 32,500 _ SYCAMORE _ _ repave parking lot. Fix standing water problem by BWL elec. box. 2 X C 32,500 SYCAMORE _ replace playground equipment in compliance with ASTM & CPSC guidelines replacemaintenance building.. _-_ - _ _ develop a land use plan 2 X C 32,500 SYCAMORE GOLF COURSE SYCAMORE GOLF COURSE SYCAMORE GOLF COURSE_ TAMMANY - _ _ _ _ _ _ TAMMANY _ _ __- TURNER -DODGE__- 2 X C_ 32,500 3 B C _ 32,500 _ _ _ clean out stream in conjunction w_/Ingham Co to replace playground equipment in compliance with ASTM & CPSC guidelines 3 ^ B D 75,000 2 X C 32,500 move basketball court (if court is needed) redesign overlook and install retaini_ng_wall to control erosion 5 X C 32,500 2 X D 75,000 TURNER -DODGE _ TURNER -DODGE _ repair of south wall in first room of f basement (excavate on outside) _ painting exterior (MS est.) 2 X C 32,500 2 X C 32,500 TURNER -DODGE _ tuck point foundation (MS est.) 2 Ix C 32,500 TURNER -DODGE conduct feasibility study to explore resources assoc. with expansion 3 A C 32,500 TURNER -DODGE acquisition of properties to the west of the house 3 G _ E 175,000 TURNER -DODGE up grade electrical per master plan 4 X C 32,500 TURNER -DODGE up grade plumbing per master plan _ 4 X D 75,000 TURNER -DODGE _ site work involving, roads, parking, walks and landscaping 4 X F 374,500 TURNER -DODGE recess sprinkler system per master plan 4 . X D 75,000 TURNER -DODGE restoration of remainder of interior' 4 X C 32,500 TURNER -DODGE provide furnishings for each room of house 8 X E 175,000 TURNER -DODGE construct a Carriage House (_Friends of T/D joint project) 8 X F 374,5W TURNER -DODGE _ construct a Visitor Orientation Center 8 X _ G 750,000 WALSH basketball court replacement 1 C C 32,500 WASHINGTON road and lot paving & signage (more ADA needed) _ 2 X E 175,000 WASHINGTON replace outdoor rink slab and cooling lines 2 + � X F 374,500 WASHINGTON __ property acquisition along Wash Ave. _ 3 G F 374,500 WASHINGTON property acquisition next to entrance 3 G E 175,000 WASHINGTON replace pavilion with a larger one with water and electric_ 6 X E 175,000 WASHINGTON_ .� _ S Washington Community Center 8 X _ H 2,000,000 WASHINGTON _ install a hard surface in the dome to permit summer uses 8 X _ D 75,000 WASHINGTON consider removing part of the back parking lot _ 9 X _ C 32,500 WAVERLY GOLF COURSE _ _ _ improve kitchentfood service area V - 1-- _ B _ C 32,500 WAVERLY GOLF COURSE _ develop a land use plan 3 B C 32,500 02/11/2000 PkPlan2000-2005.123 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT PARKS FIVE YEAR MASTER PLAN (0310112000 thru 0212812005) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PULLED FROM MASTER LIST SORTED BY PARK & PRIORITY RANKING LOCATION PROJECT Priority Second Alpha code Alpha code Ranking Ranking Est. based converted to on 1999 $ midrange of $ WAVERLY GOLF COURSE develop golf leaming center/ ractice facility 6 X F 374,500 WAVERLY GOLF COURSE irrigation improvements & pump station 6 X E 175.000 WAVERLY GOLF COURSE marking lot develo mp ent & paving 6 X C 32,500 ^ WAVERLY GOLF COURSE implement 18 hole master plan 6 X H 2,000,000 _ WENTWORTH remove and replace the entire fencing along the river (installed Inside out) 2 X C 32,500 WENTWORTH replace damaged walkways 2 X C 32,500 WESTSIDE WS North - Score shed to be upgraded 2 X C 32,500 restroom building -finish off upstairs 8 X C 32,500 _WESTSIDE WESTSIDE restroom building -remodel concession area 8 X C 32,500 WESTSIDE WS North - Install field lights 9 X C 32,500 _ WESTSIDE WS North - Install irrigation system 9 X C 32,500 WS South - Install scorer shed 9 X C 32,500 _WESTSIDE _ WESTSIDE _ _ WS South - Install irrigation system 9 X C 32,500 --------�----- Total ---^ 46,860,882 02/11/2000 PkPlan2000-2005.123 APPENDIX F FY 2001 CITY CIP LIST PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT CITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS/ DESIGNATED ACCOUNT/OTHER FUND PROJECTS SUBMITTED TO BUDGET rN ]M1 ]11 aVIJ1IMM1\ PROJECTTYPE PARK LOCATION PROJECTDESCRIPTION Park Mlllage Ballfteld Dev Fund FUND 9arols Player Surcharge GENERAL FUND Subsidy POTTER PARKZOO Improvmt Fund CDBG BLDG. Furnish& Equip. Fund Other Funds Odw Funds SOURCE PARK MILLAGE OPERATIONS PROGRAMS _ kids tamps - 7 34,404 Subtotal 34,404 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PARK MILLAGE INFRASTRUCTURE ACQUISITION _-_ 1.25_ COTTAGE CT. acquire property for riverfmntage 37,600 Subtotal 37,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 __ __ -_, • BASKETBALL COURT REPAIR _ _ _ELMHURST replace basketball court 6,500 BASKETBALL COURT REPAIR _ _. _ GRAVES -_- replace basketball court 5,515 BASKETBALL COURT REPAIR - HUNTER _ court needs aprons basketball40 2,0 _ BASKETBALL COURT REPAIR -- _ - LYONS _ _ _ basketball couA needs aprons 2,400 _ BASKETBALL COURT REPAIR - OAK - _ resurface asphalt court / remove old concrete court by Lesher Place 6,700 _ BASKETBALL COURT REPAIR _-_ _ PORTER _replace basketball court _ 9,900 BASKETBALL COURT REPAIR - _ ST. JOSEPH _-_ basketball court repair 10,600 BASKETBALL COURT REPAIR __- WALSH basketball courts need replacement 23,0DO BASKETBALL COURT REPAIR WESTSIDE _ basketba_Ngoalfootingraised- REPLACE POLES 3,000 3,oDO _ BASKETBALL COURT REPAIR - SON _ WIL- _ basketball court needs aprons and regrade around court _ Subtotal 75,515 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 BUILDING MAINTENANCE i i Bl11LDING MAINTENANCE _-_ BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE -- BUILDING MAINTENANCE _ BUILDING MAINTENANCE _ _ _ . CONCRETE REPAIRS , _ _ _ CONCRETE REPAIRS _ - - - ATHLETIC FIELDS FENNER _ _ _ HUNTER -_ _-_ _ _ MOORES I OAK PARK GARAGE OFFICE ' SYCAMORE PARK _ ., . _- }CAVMlAl1GH _ COMSTK OC REUTTER ST. JOSEPH _ _ knlement a preeventative malts. Ilan for ba115e1d liphtlng p �replace. carpe Nbrar� ! pool mealm-install sand fitters, liner re_meM, reehoom partitions -_ - 50,000 7,600 -- 151.262 I pod ropan-re Iwace hot water stomQe tank andcen_rnk Obs per Dept of Public Haatlh _ garage vehicle exhaust system-_ __ -- - renovate restmoms 89,000 - 42,325 20,ODO -- 390AST build met 0 to verify 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ -- -. Subtotal rconcrete-sidewalk --- repairs needed (City S school) _ _ concrete-mplaco concrete steps and park sidewalks (pudic service) _5,000 7,500 _ CONCRETE REPAIRS _ concrete -sidewalk repairs needed 25,500 CONCRETE REPAIRS _ _ _ concrete -replace concrete pad around 3 sides of resboom burg. �_ 3,500 CONCRETE REPAIRS WOODCREEK _ ____ _ _ connate -need paved path to courts. Area is low and wet pat 2,500 47AW 60,000 0- 0- - 0 0 0 0 0 0 __- _ Subtotal CONSULTANT FEES NOT PROJECT SPECIFIC consultarrt fees- CONSULTANT FEES ADADO/ RIVERFRONT/ TRAIL_ Research and design route of River Trail to Hawk Island County Park through Sycanare Golf Cot 12,500 _-- 12,500 I CONSULTANT FEES ADADO/ RIVERFRT/ TRAIL deve master plan In con)unction with the Musk Fast (LEPFA) 10,000 CONSULTANT FEES QUENTIN develop master plan with neighborhood org-anization -� _10,000. 10,000 CONSULTANT FEES OAK PARK FIELD OFFICE _--- develop alte_plan - Subtotal 1025W 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,500 0 LANSING SCHOOL DISTRICT EVERETT wJxxA conbibutlon to ball fieldlighting__ - ---- -'- 40,000 -- - - - 40,000 L Sch. Dist _Subtotal 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 -__ 0 40000 0 MAINTENANCE COMPLEX OAK PARK FIELD OFFICE - -- after its is complete-mbuild akxege sheds and pays storage yard, 340 D00 _ _--- Subtotal 340,0DO 0 _ _0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PARK 25DO E. MT. HOPE (FENNER) demolition of existing buildings_ - PARK ADADO/ RIVERFRT/ TRAIL River Trail- S&S Dye,consbuct behind & repair old (Spring to 496) as needed 65,000 105,000 DNR Grrt PARK BURCHARD - WEST replace entire s, benches, etc. (trip hazards) 15,000 _ _ _ _ - PARK CHERRY HILL launch & dock redesign and renovation Feb. 2000 Fisheries Grant request) 30,000 _ 20,000 DNR Grant - PARK DURANT park redevelopment master plan -pletion,sidawalk, archway repair, aft.) _ 125,0DO -'-�- - - -- - PARK FENNER Install composting bNet - 120DO-- 0 �_ Subtotal 297,000 0_ 0 0 0 0 215000 __ 0 __. PARK PAVING -�--- ADADO/ RIVERFRT/ TRAIL u -River Trail paving and decking repairs 130 000 _ ---- '------ .._ - •_L. - - LW pay, PARK PAVING ADADO/ RIVERFRT/ TRAIL asphalt4ina and sign the trail In accordance with current standards -__----- 3,000 -- PARK PAVING _ ADADO/ RIVERFRT/ TRAIL as -rolls s necessary sections on an annual basis - _ 50,000PARK PAVING PARK PAVING BURCHARD - EAST COOLEY as tt-resurface (eliminate standing water by sibs & SW comer (add CB?)) asphalt -add handicapped parking spaces '- ------ 7,000 -"-' S00- PARKPAVING asphalt -Install daceleraWn lane Into pak_mad along Lansing Rd. 4,666 PARK PAVING INGHAM asphalt -pave perking lol, sign. stripe etc.--- _--- 16.500 --- _-- - _-_-� 02/112000 PkPlan2000.2005.123 PARKS i RECREATION DEPARTMENT CITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS/ DESIGNATED ACCOUNT/OTHER FUND PROJECTS SUBMITTED TO BUDGET /CVIM1. 711MICIAM1011 PROJECT TYPE PARK MILLAGE OPERATIONS .___ PARK MILLAOE_INFRA_S_TRUCT_URE_ _ PARK PAVING_ -_ PARK PAVING -._. _ .. PARK PAVING-- - PARK LOCATION _ PROGRAMS _. .. _ _-- _ _ MILLER RD. C. C. ., SCOTT WOODS_ , . - WESTSIDE -- - ATTWOOD (SOUTH) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Park Mlllage Ballfleld Dev Fund FUND 94role Player Surcharge GENERAL FUND Subsidy POTTER PARKZOO Improvmt Fund CDSG BLDG. Furnish& Equip. Fund Other Funds Other Funds SOURCE - kkU CamPa-7 --. 34404 Subtotal 34AU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 as I�eO-paMng lot knprovements whh ADA access 13.400 asphalt -redo parking K need parking barricades 3 aignage 10.800 asphalt -check paving status and install signage for handicapped 2w Subtotal 235AW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT � replace playground equipment In compliance wb ASTM A CPSC guidelines 35,0DO - - PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT_ HOLLY - replace playground equipment in compliance with ASTM NL CPSC guidelines--- replace playground equipment In compliance with ASTM 6 CPSC guklelinea -_-_- 35 Ogg 35 ODO - - - -- -- PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT - -� -- CHERRY HILL - - - --- -- WULTIPLE SITES --- -_ --_ PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT _-- --'_ _ _ replacement of auxiliary items as removed 30,0D0 _ PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT MULTIPLE SITES-. __ Install of west at multiple sites . .---- -- install two permanent handicapped picnic sables replace bleacher units to meet current codes 10.000 2,ODO 17,500 i- -- --_. _ __ FENNER PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT MULTIPLE SITES Subtotal 184,5W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 dock,walk,rail;cwr ;backstop;fence replaco;park ben1rade;ero3. cont.;etc. 20.700 REPAIR 6 MAINTENANCE -CITY WIDE VARIOUS SITES - - -- _ REPAIR 6 MAINTENANCE -CITY WIDE MOORES----__-_-_ TURNER-0OOGE, - fencs around shuttle board courts 4,8M �- -- - REPAIR d MAINTENANCE -CITY WIDE _ remove overlook and install drainage to Control erosion -- 9DO REPAIR d MAINTENANCE -CITY WIDE WOODCREEK evaluate 6 knplament drainage plans to drain water o8 Oka - _ Subtotal - Total 8,500 34.900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - OTHER FUNDS - ----- _ _ --_� - - 1799808 _ Target --- ---- --Difference 1.799,808 0 - - -- - - - -- BANCROFT PARK ZOO _ POTTER PARK ZOO _ POTTER PARK ZOO _ .- POTTER PARK ZOO - --- - -- CDBG -•- _ _ -.-- _ -. -_ POTTER PARK ZOO FUND --------- -- replace paygrouM equipment In compliance with ASTM 6 CPSC guidelines - Subtotal es�halt-restoration W pattrvvays. mach, perking areas, paving A striping --- - 35,000 -- 0 0 0 0 0 35,0D0 1 0 0 - 0 20.000 POTTER PARK COMPLEX DESIGNATED • exhibit fen!LJ%repahe _ ahotcrete_ �ro n .-. 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 POTTER PARK COMPLEX DESIGNATED • 70,000 _ POTTER PARK COMPLEX DESIGNATED • .` . _--_ outdoor av ro n _ 10.000 _.- POTTER PARK COMPLEX DESIGNATED • POTTER PARK ZOO- - animal care fatal 30,000 220.ODO R ! Zoo Soc. --__ Subtotal 0 0 0 20000 /DO,000 _ - 0 0 220ODO 0 CEMETERY FUND CEMETERY_OFF_ICE_ wncrets-redeaign per" 6 walks to building for ADA replace gate _ entry archway needs to be repalred _ - 25,ODO 15,500 5,000 _ CEMETERY FU ND EVERGREEN CEMETERY FUND MT. HOPE Subtotal starter house Im emaMood service 6 kNChen wea renovations) 0 0 0 45500 0 0 0 0 0 28,0DO -! GOLF FUND WAVERLY GOLF FUND _ _ SYCAMORE- and obi kk�bt_ 8,000 _- ^._ Subtotal 0 0 0 _ 34000 0 .-- 0 _ 0 0 0 GOLF-9 HOLE SURCHARGE -DESIGNATED GROESBECK GC repak retaining wall83 green - '2,500 - --- GOLF-9 HOLE SURCHARGE -DESIGNATED RED CEDAR _--- lot emenU _ _ __- 10,ODO _- GOLF-9 HOLE SURCHARGE -DESIGNATED' SYCAMORE replace maintenance bam 20 000----- - __�- Subtotal 0 0 32,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ _-- SOFTBALL/BASEBALL SURCHARGE - B. DAVIS so tW field Irrigation (continuation from FY 20DO) possible grant match 0 15.805 /5,f1115 Subtotal 0 0 0 _ 0 0 9550 - 0 ---- _-- -_--- -_.---- --- ----- ---•- BUILDIRGUSEPOLICY"" --_- folding. tables, floorbulferand vkieoPml _ -._--- Subtotal - 0`_-0 01 0 0 -0 9,550 0 --....-0 City Council resolution of 7r2wo as amended City Council resolution #W9 of 224/97 as amended "• City Council resolution #489 of 1 VJ/88 as amended '•'• City Council resolution N219 of 5W7 as amended 02/112000 PkPIan2000.2005.123 APPENDIX G PROGRAM & OPERATIONAL NEEDS PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT PARKS FIVE YEAR MASTER PLAN (03/01/2000 thru 02/28/2005) PROGRAM/ OPERATIONAL NEEDS ITEM PROJECT Priority Second Oversight Est. based Ranking Ranking on 1999 $ EQUIPMENT -ROLLING STOC Parks -bleacher replacement-5 high 1 C P C EQUIPMENT -ROLLING STOCf _ Parks playground equipment -provide for single units to fill in when non -compliant equipment is remo 2 X P D EQUIPMENT -ROLLING STOC_ Forestry -add a chipper to support the tower truck 4 X F B EQUIPMENT -ROLLING STOCP Grounds & Landscape Maintenance -purchase a small chipper for parks work 4 X G B EQUIPMENT -ROLLING STOCP Forestry -add a chip truck to support the tower truck 4 X F C EQUIPMENT -ROLLING STOCP Forestry -purchase a fourth tower truck 4 X F C OPERATIONS/PROGRAMS Grounds & Landscape Maintenance -increase parks maintenance personnel 2 X G E OPERATIONS/PROGRAMS Youth Development Initiative -America's Promise 3 A L D OPERATIONS/PROGRAMS Adopt -A -Park Program _ 3 C P B OPERATIONS/PROGRAMS Forest -CSO inspector 3 E F C OPERATIONS/PROGRAMS Forestry -increase personnel to reduce the trim cycle and park shrub/tree maintenance 3 E F E OPERATIONS/PROGRAMS Park Design -put park plans/infrastructure on an electronic data base 3 F P C OPERATIONS/PROGRAMS Forestry-integ rate tree inventory with the city G.I.S. 3 F F D OPERATIONS/PROGRAMS Kids Camps -Seven sites (Wages TEA Hourly,overtime-salary,fringe benefits, & misc. operating ex 5 X L C OPERATIONS/PROGRAMS Fenner Nature Center -add a full time natrualist and a clerk 5 X L D OPERATIONS/PROGRAMS Park Security 5 X _ A F OPERATIONS/PROGRAMS Turner/Dodge-provide staffing for marketing and programming of the house 6 X L C OPERATIONS/PROGRAMS Potter Park Zoo -add seasonal positions to increase grounds maintenance 8 X Z C OPERATIONS/PROGRAMS Potter Park Zoo -add a Curator position 8 X Z D OPERATIONS/PROGRAMS _ Scott Center -provide additional custodial services so the can be appropriately maintained 9 X L C 11/06/199912:23:08 PM GRANT PROJECT MAPS H.1 REVISION DATE: 1/19/2000 W 1W H.2 REVISION DATE: 1/19/2000