Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1996 Preliminary Design for South Side Community Center City of Lansing MI
I I I f 0 Southside Community Center Preliminary Design Report 1996 Permanent PRELIMINARY D FOR SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY o CENTER CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGA 0 L L O N � 4 u 0 �C: o E O L °— U c Hobbs + Black Project No. 95-303 January 15, 1996 CAPITAL CONSULTANTS ENGINEERS I...IOBBS 820 N. Washington Ave. Lansing, Michigan 48906 + BLACK (517)371-1200 Fax: (517) 371-2013 ASSOCIATES COMMUNITY PLANNING SERVICES Architects, Planners I N C 6020 North Hagadorn, Suite 100 & Interior Designers East Lansing Michigan 48823 215 S. Washington, Suite 120 (517) 336-6044 Lansing, Michigan 48933 Fax: (517) 336-6047 (517) 484-4870 Fax (517)484-1369 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER PRELIMINARY DESIGN Project No. 95-303 SPACE NEED ANALYSIS ................... 1 DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS ................. 2 SITE SELECTION ......................... 3 SITE ANALYSIS ........................... 4 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN .................... 5 SCHEMATIC DESIGN ...................... 6 COST ESTIMATE AND OPERATING COSTS .... 7 FUNDING SOURCES ....................... 8 CONCLUSION ............................ 9 APPENDIX A ............................. 10 HOBBS + BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC. - I - �1 it n SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER PRELIMINARY DESIGN Project No. 95-303 INTRODUCTION On May 23, 1994 the City Council of the City of Lansing adopted a resolution to create an Ad Hoc Committee on Development of the South Side Community Center. The Ad Hoc Committee was composed of 12 appointed citizens and by. the Council Members representing the Second and Third Wards. The Ad Hoc Committee was charged with conducting an assessment of community needs for recreation facilities and other services that may be provided at the new Community Center. Hobbs + Black was retained in May of 1995 by the Department of Parks and Recreation to prepare a study while working with the Ad Hoc Committee that would ultimately result in the schematic design of a Southside Community Center that responds to the needs as determined by the Ad Hoc Committee and reflects demographic information for the south side of Lansing. I HOBBS + BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC. PAGE 1 1 L-7 SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER ' PRELIMINARY DESIGN PROJECT No. 95-303 SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS The Ad Hoc Committee created a report that outlines general program space needs based upon their research and findings in the community. The Ad Hoc Committee's report outlines the requirements for a Southside Community ' Center that is multi -generational and multi -purpose that addresses the needs of the following groups: ' ■ Senior Groups ■ Youth Groups ■ Neighborhood Associations ■ Civic Groups ■ Parks and Recreation ' The followingspace needs stud and budget cost estimate was prepared with the p Y g p p ' Committee and represents the Committee's recommendations for specific building spaces required. 11 HOBBS + BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC. SECTION 1, PAGE 1 SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER Lansing, Michigan Space Need Study/Budget Cost Estimate June 12, 1995 Hobbs + Black Associates, Inc. SPACE NET GROSSING GROSS COST ITEM DESCRIPTION AREA X AREA AREA X /SF = COST 1 RECREATIUN/FITNESS 1.1 Gymnasium - Full Court Basketball - Half Court Basketball - Bleachers - Storage 1.2 Lockers/Showers - Toilets 1.3 Fitness/Exercise Room - Exercise Equipment (not included) - Space for Aerobics, etc. 1.4 Storage TOTALS 2 ARTS/CRAFT 2.1 Art/Craft Room -With Movable Divider Wall 2.2 Woodworking 2.3 Storage TOTALS 3 MULTI -PURPOSE ROOMS 3.1 Large Room (100 people @ tables & chairs) = 2,000 sf - Possible Moveable Divider Wall - Dining, Dancing, Meetings - Portable Stage 3.2 Medium Room (50 people @ tables & chairs) - Cards - Meetings 3.3 Medium Room 3.4 Small Room (25 people @ tables & chairs) 3.5 Small Room (25 people @ tables & chairs) 3.6 Small Room 3.7 Kitchen - Service Pre -Prepared Food Only (catered functions) - No Food Prep/Cooking - Not Including Equipment 3.8 Storage TOTALS 8,300 sf x 1.4 11,620 sfx $90 = $1,045,800 3,000 sf x 1.4 = 4,200 sf x $110 = $462,000 2,400 sf x 1.4 = 3,360 sf x $75 = $252,000 1,000 sf x 1.4 = 1,400 sf x $45 = $63,000 20,580 sf $1,822,800 800 sfx 1.4 = 1,120 sfx $55 = $61,600 800 sf x 1.4 = 1,120 sf x $60 = $67.200 150 sf x 1.4 = 210 sf x $45 = $9,450 2,450 sf $138,250 2,000 sf x 1.4 = 2,800 sf x $65 = $182,000 1,000 sfx 1.4 = 1,400 sfx $65 = $91,000 1,000 sfx 1.4 = 1,400 sfx $65 = $91,000 500 sf x 1.4 = 700 sf x $65 = $45,500 500 sf x 1.4 = 700 sf x $65 = $45,500 500 sf x 1.4 = 700 sf x $65 = $45,500 300 sf x 1.4 = 420 sf x $110 = $46,200 200 sf x 1.4 = 280 sf x $45 = $12,600 8,400 sf $559,300 HOBBS + BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC. SECTION 1, PAGE 2 4 ADMINISTRATION 4.1 Receptionist/Secretary 100 sf x 1.4 = 140 sf x $70 = $9,800 4.2 Director's Office 120 sf x 1.4 = 168 sf x $70 = $11,760 4.3 Assistant Director 120 sf x 1.4 = 168 sf x $70 = $11,760 4.4 Workroom/Storage 200 sf x 1.4 = 280 sf x $80 = $22,400 TOTALS 756 sf $55,720 5 LIBRARY/CLASSROOM 5.1 Library 2,000 sf x 1.4 = 2,800 sf x $65 = $182,000 5.2 Study Area 180 sf x 1.4 = 252 sf x $65 = $16,380 - Tutoring - 3 Cubicles @ 60 sf Each 5.3 Computer Room 400 sf x 1.4 = 560 sf x $65 = $36,400 -10 Computer Stations TOTALS 3,612 sf $234,780 6 COMMON SPACE 6.1 Youth Game Room 900 sfx 1.4 = 1,260 sfx $65 = $81,900 - 4 Game Tables (300 so - Ping Pong (portable for use at Multi -Purpose Room) - 2 Billiards (500 so -Storage (100 so 6.2 Senior Lounge 900 sf x 1.4 = 1,260 sf x $65 = $81,900 - Game Tables - Seating Area 6.3 Senior Game Room (600 so 600 sf x 1.4 = 840 sf x $65 = $54,600 - 2 Billiards (500 so - Storage (100 SO 6.4 Vending 150 sf x 1.4 = 210 sf x $70 = $14,700 6.5 Main Lobby 600 sf x 1.4 = 840 sf x $85 = $71,400 - Displays - Craft Sales, etc. 6.6 Senior Gift Shop 400 sf x 1.4 = 560 sf x $65 = $36,400 6.7 Toilet Rooms 600 sf x 1.4 = 840 sf x $100 = $84,000 6.8 General Storage 1,000 sf x 1.4 = 1,400 sf x $45 = $63,000 TOTALS 7,210 sf $487,900 7 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORK CENTER 7.1 Resource Coord./Social Worker 120 sf x 1.4 = 168 sf x $70 = $11,760 7.2 Health Services Coordinator 120 sf x 1.4 = 168 sf x $70 = $11,760 7.3 Community Police Officer 120 sf x 1.4 = 168 sf x $70 = $11,760 7.4 Four Additional Offices 720 sf x 1.4 = 1,008 sf x $70 = $70,560 7.5 Storage/Work Room 300 sf x 1.4 = 420 sf x $80 = $33,600 7.6 Reception/Waiting 300 sf x 1.4 = 420 sf x $70 = $29,400 Note: If the Network Center is made part of the Community Center, then kitchen, meeting rooms, toilet rooms, etc. could be shared. TOTALS 2,352 sf $168,840 GRAND TOTALS 1 - 7 45,360 sf $3,467,590 HOBBS + BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC. SECTION 1, PAGE 3 8 GENERAL SITE IMPROVEMENTS 8.1 Parking 460 spaces x $450 space = $207,165 - 90 Degree Parking/Paved 8.2 Roadway Improvements 100 If x $80 If = $8,000 - 20' Wide/Paved 8.3 Walkway Improvement 300 If x $10 If = $3,000 - Paved Walkways to ' Outdoor Amenities and to Building Entries 8.4 Landscaping Lump Sum $20,000 8.5 Shuffleboard Courts 6 ea x $1,800 ea = $10,800 8.6 Horseshoe Courts 4 ea x $500 ea = $2,000 8.7 Multi -Age Playground Lump Sum $35,000 8.8 Sand Volleyball 1 ea x $3,500 ea = $3,500 8.9 Outdoor Basketball Court 1 ea x $18,000 ea = $18,000 8.10 Roller blade Area 1 ea x $6,400 ea = $6,400 8.11 Pickup Softball/Soccer Lump Sum $65,000 Field/Play Field 8.12 Tennis Court w/Fencing 2 ea x $30,000 ea = $60,000 8.13 Group Picnic Shelter 1 ea x $25,000 ea = $25,000 w/Tables TOTAL ESTIMATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS $463,865 TOTAL ESTIMATED BUILDING COST $3,467,590 ' SUBTOTAL 15% CONTINGENCY $3,931,455 $589,718 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $4,521,173 ' FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT ALLOWANCE $250,000 ADD FOR SWIMMING POOL $1,500,000 - Includes Additional Lockers/ Showers - Includes 15% Contingency NOTE: This is not a detailed estimate and represents an estimate based on historical square foot cost data for similar buildings. I� 1 HOBBS + BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC. SECTION 1, PAGE 4 OCCUPANT LOAD/PARKING CALCULATION NET OCCUPANT OCCUPANT PARKING NO.OF AREA / LOAD AREA = LOAD / FACTOR = PRK SPACES 1 RECREATION 1.1 Gymnasium 8,300 sf / 15 sf = 553 / 3 = 184 1.2 Lockers/Showers 3,000 sf / 100 sf = 30 / N/A = -0- 1.3 Fitness/Exercise Room 2,400 sf / 50 sf = 48 / 3 = 16 1.4 Storage 1,000 sf / 300 sf = 3 / N/A = -0- 2 ARTS/CRAFT 2.1 Art/Craft Room 800 sf / 20 sf = 40 / 3 = 13 2.2 Woodworking 800 sf / 20 sf = 40 / 3 = 13 2.3 Storage 150 sf / 1 sf = N/A / 3 = -0- 3 MULTI -PURPOSE ROOMS 3.1 Large Room 2,000 sf / 15 sf = 133 / 3 = 44 3.2 Medium Room 1,000 sf / 15 sf = 67 / 3 = 22 3.3 Medium Room 1,000 sf / 15 sf = 67 / 3 = 22 3.4 Small Room 500 sf / 15 sf = 33 / 3 = 11 3.5 Small Room 500 sf / 15 sf = 33 / 3 = 11 3.6 Small Room 500 sf / 15 sf = 33 / 3 = 11 3.7 Kitchen 300 sf / 200 sf = 2 / WA = -0- 3.8 Storage 200 sf / 300 sf = 1 / N/A = -0- 4 ADMINISTRATION 4.1 Receptionist/Secretary 100 sf / 100 sf = 1 / 3 = 0 4.2 Director's Office 120 sf / 100 sf = 1 / 3 = 0 4.3 Assistant Director 120 sf / 100 sf = 1 / 3 = 0 4.4 Workroom/Storage 200 sf / 300 sf = 1 / N/A = -0- 5 LIBRARY/CLASSROOM 5.1 Library 2,000 sf / .20 sf = 100 / 3 = 33 5.2 Study Area 180 sf / 20 sf = 9 / 3 = 3 5.3 Computer Room 400 sf / 20 sf = 20 / 3 = 7 6 COMMON SPACE 6.1 Youth Game Room 900 sf / 15 sf = 60 / 3 = 20 6.2 Senior Lounge 900 sf / 15 sf = 60 / 3 = 20 6.3 Senior Game Room 600 sf / 15 sf = 40 / 3 = 13 6.4 Vending 150 sf / 15 sf = 10 / N/A = -0- 6.5 Main Lobby 600 sf / 7 sf = 86 / N/A = -0- 6.6 Senior Gift Shop 400 sf / 20 sf = 20 / 3 = 7 6.7 Toilet Rooms 600 sf / N/A sf = -0- / N/A = -0- 6.8 General Storage 1,000 sf / 300 sf = 3 / N/A = -0- 7 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORK CENTER 7.1 Resource Coord./Social Worker 120 sf / 100 sf = 1 / 2 = 1 7.2 Health Services Coordinator 120 sf / 100 sf = 1 / 2 = 1 7.3 Community Police Officer 120 sf / 100 sf = 1 / 2 = 1 7.4 Four Additional Offices 720 sf / 100 sf = 7 / 2 = 4 7.5 Storage/Work Room 300 sf / 300 sf = 3 / N/A = -0- 7.6 Reception/Waiting 300 sf / 100 sf = 3 / 2 = 2 GRAND TOTALS occupants: 1,512 Parking Required: 460 HOBBS + BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC. SECTION 1, PAGE 5 1 I � 7 SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER PRELIMINARY DESIGN PROJECT No. 95-303 DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS The Ad Hoc Committee had determined that the proposed Community Center would be multi -generational and multi -purpose, and the primary potential user populations would be seniors and youth. Therefore the preliminary demographic analysis, as it related to potential sites, was focused on population levels of seniors (aged 60 and over) and ' youths (aged under 5 to 17). The largest youth population is concentrated in the central and western areas of the southside (census tracts 20, 24, 27, 53.03, 37, 36'.02, 36.01, 51 and 52.01). The largest senior population is concentrated in the central and northwestern areas of the southside (census tracts 17.02, 23, 37, 27, 28 and 53.03). 1 The maps on the following two pages show the areas of highest population as referenced. A more detailed demographic analysis, as prepared by Community Planning Services, is attached to this report as Appendix A. 11 11 I IHOBBS + BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC. SECTION 2, PAGE 1 o ---- r f IE7BE Nq ]� WT. HOPE Q J���d k j� 29.01... it -4,74 offs S. WASHINGTON r,.,� PARK,L e poll'. 1�SL�� 1 01 HOL1m8 ROAD' EVERETT HIGH �DaUU Cam_ ic�- SCHOOL a� --- �I�jlr ��AHAD;HlL RENDON PARR rr lirwrl"m— illy Al JOLLY ROAD I 1 .1. +I Y f 10 0� too 51 MCRINCH PARR I �: 1990 /h..S I-96 f`---�_�� _ •. U. S . CENSUS TRACTS CITY OF \ \_It .lam SOUTHS IDE COMMUNITY STUDY - 1995 CENTER - - �! — rnrrcct?n=r ! Marrs LANSING COMMUNITY PLANNING SERVICES/HOBBS AND BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC. HIGH CONCENTRATION OF YOUTH POPULATION Inow 'IPA" ;Ism 17.01 UUL:j FjE3 L *—j j wr. HOPE ]IFT11 i WT. MOVE AVE. --- — ------- _Ae 29.01 vvml�S. Ai;Tob PARR I 11 - - "844 logo .01 71 7_ L 011 L�JXMES qw HO_A ff WT IF _"frr VERETT HIGH r SCHO( _11p CAVANAUM ENDON PARK IF ------ JOLLY ROAD LIN 51MCKXNCH PARK , RJOAD m IC3���� ,� T f too*" 1990 10 U. S. CENSUS TRACTS 3.0 j: 'CITY If OF 11 1 _ul� SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER STUDY — 1995 )r PATF I/WiT!7 FANSING COMMUNITY PLANNING SERVICES/HOBBS AND BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC. HIGH CONCENTRATION OF SENIOR POPULATION 3 i 1 y� SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER PRELIMINARY DESIGN PROJECT No. 95-303 SITE SELECTION Several site locations were selected based on areas that correspond with the demographic information for concentrations of the targeted population groups. Other factors taken into account were: 1. Accessibility to mass transportation. 2. Location of other sources of recreation and community programs that may duplicate or conflict with the intended programs at the proposed Community Center. 3. Physical attributes of each site that might influence the proposed Community Center. 4. Only properties owned by the City were considered as potential sites so as to eliminate the need for property acquisition costs. POTENTIAL LOCATIONS Washington Park Washington Park is an established existing park in a stable neighborhood. The existing park property has many features which would make this location an excellent selection for a facility. The property is large enough to accommodate ' both the community center and new outdoor facilities in addition to the existing outdoor facilities. A center could benefit from and assist in the promotion of ' activities at the ice rink/tennis court facilities. Washington Park is not only in a target population area, it is centrally located in the south side area of the City. ' There is currently public transportation on Washington Avenue which makes the I HOBBS + BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC. SECTION 3, PAGE 1 1 n 1 1 11 SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER PRELIMINARY DESIGN PROJECT No. 95-303 site very accessible. The current park is very well known throughout the community, so visibility is very good. Kendon Park This location is a school/park site. The site's location at Pennsylvania Avenue and Cavanaugh Road makes it very accessible to public transportation and vehicular traffic. The location is also very visible for ease of identification. The park site area is approximately 5.5 acres. The adjacent school site area is approximately 9.5 acres. While the site area appears to be adequate for a Community Center building and its parking, it may not be large enough to comfortably accommodate adequate outdoor activities. Everett High School This site is a school property and would require cooperation with the School District for development of a Community Center. The school and its outdoor facilities take up most of the site. Members of the Committee pointed out that the site has been found in the past to have poor soil conditions. These two factors combined may limit the possibilities for locating a new building on the site. The school does have existing facilities, both indoor and outdoor, that could be shared with the Community Center; however, the Committee felt that the availability of the facilities would be severely limited if shared due to the scheduling of school activities. 1 HOBBS + BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC. SECTION 3, PAGE 2 LI 1 u SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER PRELIMINARY DESIGN PROJECT No. 95-303 The site's primary access is off Cavanaugh Road, which may limit accessibility from public transportation and visibility to the public. The school is highly visible from Holmes Road. If a Community Center is built at the south end of the site, it would have very little, if any, visibility from Holmes Road. McKinch Park This site is a current neighborhood park that has recently grown in size due to the acquisition of property to the north of the original park. With the recently acquired property, the park would be adequate for a Community Center building and outdoor facilities. There currently is no access to the property from Jolly Road which makes the park difficult to get to. Visibility is also limited because of existing residential properties that separate the park from Jolly Road. This location is relatively close to the Boy's & Girl's Club facility on Pleasant Grove which may duplicate some of the intended programs at the proposed Community Center. The information on the four sites was presented to the Committee. The Committee voted to approve Washington Park as the site to investigate further for the design of the proposed South End Community Center. ' HOBBS + BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC. SECTION 3, PAGE 3 r r �J 1 I r I 1 SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER PRELIMINARY DESIGN PROJECT No. 95-303 SITE ANALYSIS Washington Park is located on the west side of South Washington Avenue between Mt. Hope Avenue and Holmes Road. The 45.4 acre site is an existing City of Lansing Parks and Recreation Department park. The park has the City's only outdoor refrigerated ice rink, a softball diamond utilized in the summer for league play, newly installed modular play equipment, existing picnicking facilities, as well as park drives and parking. A site plan of the existing park is shown on the following page. The Washington Park site is easily driven to by car as Washington Avenue is a major north/south thoroughfare. Mt. Hope Avenue and Holmes Road, which are located at the major north and south intersections of Washington Avenue, provide good vehicular feeder routes. The Capital Area Transit Authority (CATA) currently provides bus service along Washington Avenue. A traffic light is currently in operation at the intersection of Greenlawn Street and Washington Avenue. By moving the existing park entrance south to align with the intersection, the light at the center and park entrance could provide the increased safety for vehicular as well as pedestrian visitors to the site. Neighboring land uses include the Ingham Medical Care facilities, now a part of Michigan Capital Healthcare, directly east, the National Guard Armory to the north, and residential housing to the east and south. The western property boundary is property owned by the Board of Water and Light. The park is comprised of three primary land areas which will be referred to as the western, southern and northern regions. The western region is topographically the lowest area of the park and is considered wet most of the year due to the fact that the topography tends to trap and hold water within this area. The area is covered with scrubby brush and trees and is currently not used for recreational purposes. Due to its wetness and poor soils, this area would not be considered developable. IHOBBS + BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC. SECTION 4, PAGE 1 1 1 A 11 1 1 Ll 11 SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER PRELIMINARY DESIGN PROJECT No. 95-303 The second region is the southern region of the park. This region includes the softball diamond, ice rink and parking areas. These areas of the park are fully utilized; and, if utilized for the site of the center, redevelopment of the existing facilities would be costly. The narrow strip of land used for the access drive into the southern region of the park is narrow and would not provide good visibility for the center building. The third region is the northern region of the site. This area currently is enjoyed for informal picnicking and is the location of newly installed play equipment. If utilized for the site of the center, there is enough land area to allow for the center as well as continue the existing park uses of picnicking and the relocation of the play equipment. This area has excellent visibility from Washington Avenue as well as a second park entrance. Topographically this region is the highest in elevation and is the best drained providing a better building site. Utilities for the center, water, sewer, gas and telephone can easily be accessed from the services within the Washington Avenue right-of-way. Based on this information, the northern region of the site was selected for the community center site. 1 HOBBS + BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC. SECTION 4, PAGE 2 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 U At N Washington Park o 100, zoo' M APITAL NSULTANTS E N G I N E E R S OPP /.' le PROPERTY \\1 I 1 � LIMITS i r Im DUNLA , STbR,?,GE BUILD N ARMORY 12• a PLAY SHELTER ';EQUIPM1 SOFTBAL f It i snr South Side Community Center Study City of Lansing LEGEND: }Y •-1!LrC— Electric, Lighting ? —sew- Combined Sewer --mTwStorm Sewer - Culvert & Headwal `. —o — Gas —w - Water Gravel Drive -- — Property Line Dews wi :klfMa lm fe= WS Waah ron Pd•k boa+ Map, Porker Dept. IYG, >i�w"�of8ury i r u Nftas"a ,fn hOtt wt+4� �CW 0 t SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER PRELIMINARY DESIGN PROJECT No. 95-303 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN A conceptual site and building plan was developed. The building program space requirements were incorporated into a general concept plan. The conceptual building plan was also designed to complement the existing site features and traffic patterns. The conceptual plan and building plan was presented to the Committee and direction was given to proceed with schematic design at Washington Park. HOBBS + BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC. SECTION 5, PAGE 1 z Q M N Washington Park ;:j_ __'v �--.---- - -- -- -- -��� .-- - -- -- -- - -- STORAGE ARMOR`' BUILD N 24 PARKING PLAY ,.a tiS jM hlU� / G �OUIPM�N .'"Ni �- f "ON SHELTER �� t Of ' S ` SAA r// °R�. C -------------- -------� L -- -- -- -- -- — — —--•-------- -- — �. Esc PROPERTY I LIMITS 1 TG RINK — { 0 i W — 1 ♦ 1 /L •6Q "-- Gl co I Q .eo / \ !, SOPTBAL - 0 I � 161 W. «. P.rt � DZ•. Nap, 1—U. D.pr Fyn w...y y1` APITAL ONSULTANTS E N G I N E E R S DUNLAP 1Ty M •[W South Side Community Center Study City of Lansing +0K ASSOCIAM PYttIf�r1 a hwbr M1 I/OQ. Y Dr H r fr r SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER PRELIMINARY DESIGN PROJECT No. 95-303 SCHEMATIC DESIGN More detailed schematic plans were developed after several presentations and working sessions with the Committee. ' The final schematic site plan, building plan and building elevations represent a Committee approved design that Is responsive to the program requirements established ' by the Committee early in the design process. The budget cost estimate was updated to reflect the final schematic plan. This plan is designed with the intent that the project may be completed in phases. An estimate of furnishings and equipment costs was also prepared at this time. It was determined by the Committee that the building interior should be constructed with ' low maintenance and highly durable materials (i.e. painted concrete masonry walls, suspended acoustic ceilings, and resilient flooring). The aerobic/fitness room and the ' gymnasium will require special athletic floor finishes. The building exterior will be either brick masonry veneer or a decorative concrete M masonry veneer with limestone accents. ' The Committee also stressed the importance of planning for future technology such as provisions for satellite links and computer network systems. The building should be ' constructed with proper conduits and outlets for future cabling of these systems. I HOBBS + BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC. SECTION 6, PAGE 1 1 I 1 Z z S J _Z � t Q r N N YNash ington- 0 100* 200' DATE STATUS- 8-30-95 PRELIMINARY / / J / q / / P ' 0 ' Parking Bas ke tbo I I ��' Sidewalk - , � 29 o� volleyball ' Play Eclyipmen / / r I LIMITS I I I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I 1 I I 1. I 0 z Y [Z ICE RINK 57GRA0E BUILDING ter: ■ s 3 � , x— / o t* 14 Ysi / A/(S r AAA A Entry Sign chuff leboard Horseshoes HOBBS +BLACK ASSOCIATES INC LIZ-oAPITAL South Side Gornrnunity Center Study -Situ Flan Architects. Planners t & Interior Designers ONSULTANTS I N State St.B9 G I o Mn W-h. qt-. S .8120 E N G N E E R S J Lansing (31C) 663 89 275 S Wmnmgtm. SvRe 120 lans�ng, r+ichgan 4870 (517) 484—s970 II II I II II II II 1 1 DUNLA N a. Q z O U W W U z vi w F- L) O Q Y U a m U) m m O 2 �j Z w ve W �y -1 V Jy4llJ lc' d m Ri n 2... .: .. ... ,._ M( 1w2 LLJ `.J C C m a- t!7 v �7 _ e e �� � m -- I� 1 1 1 c .LM C 1D 7 C m W �O (n �'J a �), ■ =mU Z"_c� cc ` s G Cl �- Z O �� �L L° - �E 3 ccC) � ui Co _ �' -' Q Q Q C. U I � I � I � � I li M W c� a a z O U W U) South Elevation North Elevation West Elevation East Elevation ml=rl== o D W & Ap K . YES 2°1 T T!S DATE GSUED DRAWN BY v w O CHECKED BY Q a SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY: CENTER I CITY OF z LANSING cn w PROJECT Q U HOBBS CAI +BLLAACK a ASSOCIATES INC J Architects. Planners m & Interior Designers + rn in 100 N Slate SI(MI m Ann Afoot. M.Cmgan 48104 O (313) 663•4189 = 215 S. wasnfngton $..to 220 Lansing, nl,crngan 48933 15171 48A- 870 CONS.nTa T r. , . SHEET TITLE a SHEET "UMBER I� i I 17 I ' SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER PRELIMINARY DESIGN PROJECT No. 95 303 COST ESTIMATE AND OPERATING COSTS 1 1 1 11 1 11 1 IHOBBS + BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC. SECTION 7, PAGE 1 ' SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER Lansing, Michigan SCHEMATIC DESIGN COST ESTIMATE January 15, 1996 Hobbs + Black Associates, Inc. Project No. 95-303 1 Recreation/Fitness ' 1.1 Gymnasium 10,120 SF X $90 = $910,800 1.2 Lockers/Showers 1,600 SF X $110 = $176,000 1.3 Aerobic Studio 1,120 SF X $70 = $78,400 1.4 Exercise Room (and storage) 1,320 SF X $65 = $85,800 1.5 Gym Storage 1,100 SF X $45 = $49,500 1.6 Mechanical Room 645 SF X $45 = $29,025 1 1.7 Corridor/Circulation 1,200 SF X $75 = $90,000 SUBTOTAL 17,105 SF $1,419,525 2 Multi -Purpose Rooms 2.1 Large Meeting Room (and storage) 6,070 SF X $70 = $424,900 ' 2.2 Small Meeting Rooms 1,680 SF X $70 = $117,600 2.3 Kitchen 380 SF X $110 = $41,800 ' 2.4 2.5 Mechanical Room Toilet Rooms 560 525 SF X SF X $45 = $100 = $25,200 $52,500 2.6 Storage 560 SF X $45 = $25,200 2.7 Corridor 1,030 SF X $65 = $66,950 SUBTOTAL 10,805 SF = $754,150 3 Arts and Crafts 3.1 Art Classroom (and storage) 1,390 SF X $65 = $90,350 3.2 Woodworking Shop (and storage) 1,390 SF X $65 = $90,350 3.3 Corridor 550 SF X $65 = $35,750 SUBTOTAL 3,330 SF = $216,450 ' 4 4.1 Administration Receptionist/Secretary (control desk) 530 SF X $65 = $34,450 4.2 Office 100 SF X $65 _ $6,500 4.3 Office 100 SF X $65 = $6,500 4.4 Office 100 SF X $65 = $6,500 4.5 Staff Lockers/Shower 255 SF X $100 = $25,500 4.6 Concession 100 SF X $75 = $7,500 SUBTOTAL 1,185 SF = $86,950 I 5 Senior Center 5.1 General Use 2,270 SF X $65 = $147,550 5.2 Senior Gift Shop SUBTOTAL 361 2,631 SF X SF $70 = $25,270 $172,820 6 Youth Game Room 6.1 General Use (and storage) 1,320 SF X $65 = $85,800 1 SUBTOTAL 1,320 SF = $85,800 7 Common Space 7.1 Lobby 4,105 SF X $85 = $348,925 7.2 Vending 120 SF X $65 = $7,800 7.3 Coat Room 140 SF X $65 = $9,100 7.4 Toilet Rooms (Lobby) 525 SF X $100 = $52,500 7.5 Entry Vestibule 500 SF X $65 = $32,500 SUBTOTAL 5,390 SF = $450,825 IHobbs + Black Associates, Inc. Section 7, Page 2 11 ���� U��� COMMUNITY ��������� ~~~~~°""��"~°~~ ~°~~"="°"~°"°" " " CENTER Lansing, Michigan SCHEMATIC .0 DESIGN COST ESTIMATE ..°A. E January15, 1996 Hobbs f'Black Associates,Inc. Project No. 95-303 TOTAL 41,766 SF $3,186,520 8 General Site Improvements -- 8.1 Parking -9O 271 spaces $450 = $121.950 8.2 Roadway Improvements -2OWida/Poved 1.650 LF.}{ $80 = $132.000 8.3 Walkway Improvements - Paved Walkways 1.910 LF.X $10 = $19.100 to Outdoor Amenities and to Building Entries 8.4 Landscaping Lump Sum = $20.000 8.5 Shuffleboard Courts 2 each $1.800 = $3.600 8.6 Horseshoe Courts 2 each $500 = $1.000 8.7 Relocate Multi -Age Playground Lump Sum = $15.000 8.8 Sand Volleyball 2 each $3.500 = $7.000 8.9 Outdoor Basketball Court 1 each $18.000 = $18.000 8.10 Site Utilities Lump Sum = TOTAL ESTIMATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS 8437650 TOTAL ESTIMATED BUILDING COST SUBTOTAL $3.824.170 1556CONTINGENCY TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST (1SS5/1S9G) $4,167,796 ESTIMATED ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING FEES SUBTOTAL $4.459.541 FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST 11 Hobbs +Black Associates, Inc. Section 7,Page 3 1 SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER Lansing, Michigan SCHEMATIC DESIGN COST ESTIMATE January 15, 1996 Hobbs + Black Associates, Inc. Project No. 95-303 , �.G`ros = rea ��`� � � ADD FOR FUTURE: 1 Swimming Pool 1.1 Swimming Pool 8,320 SF X $110 = $915,200 1.2 Additional Lockers/Showers 800 SF X $110 = $88,000 1.3 Pool Storage 500 SF X $45 = $22,500 1.4 Pool Equipment 880 SF X $65 = $57,200 1.5 Office 100 SF X $65 = $6,500 SUBTOTAL 10,600 SF = $1,089,400 2 Library 2.1 General Use 3,150 SF X SUBTOTAL 3,150 SF SUBTOTAL 15% CONTINGENCY TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST (1995/1996) ESTIMATED ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING FEES SUBTOTAL FUTURE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT ESTIMATE TOTAL ADD FOR FUTURE WORK I NOTE: This is not a detailed estimate and ' represents an estimate based on historical square foot cost data for similar buildings. I 11 $65 = $204,750 _ $204,750 $1,294,150 $194,123 $1,488,273 $104,179 $1,592,452 $1,592,452 IHobbs + Black Associates, Inc. Section 7, Page 4 SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER Lansing, Michigan ' FURNISHINGS AND EQUIPMENT COST ESTIMATE January 15,1996 Hobbs + Black Associates, Inc. Project No. 95-303 1 Recreation/Fitness 1.1 Bleachers $10,000 ' 1.2 Scoreboard $6,000 1.3 Sound Equipment $10,000 1.4 Exercise Equipment $50,000 1.5 Gymnasium Equipment $10,000 SUBTOTAL $86,000 2 Multi -Purpose Rooms 2.1 Round Table & Chairs (200 people @ 33 5'-0" diameter tables) $36,500 2.2 Rectangle Folding Tables & Chairs (50 people @ 12 3'X8' tables) $7,500 2.3 Movable Coat Racks (5) $2,750 2.4 Kitchen Equipment (ref/frzr, range, hood, coffee makers, dishwasher) $5,000 SUBTOTAL $51,750 3 Arts and Crafts I 3.1 3.2 Woodworking Equipment (10 stations with 2 benches and dust collection system) Art (kiln, potter's wheel, tables and chairs) $15,000 $6,000 SUBTOTAL $21,000 4 Administration Office Equipment 4.1 Furniture, Files, etc. (3 offices and recept.) $10,000 4.2 Copier, Fax, Telephones $7,000 SUBTOTAL $17,000 5 Senior Center 5.1 Tables and Chairs (5 round tables with chairs) $5,500 5.2 Billiards Table and Equipment $1,000 5.3 Sofas, Informal Seating SUBTOTAL $3,000 $9,500 6 Youth Game Room 6.1 Tables and Chairs (2 round tables with chairs) $2,200 ' 6.2 Billiard Table $1,000 6.3 Table Tennis (2) $1,000 6.4 Miscellaneous Equipment $2,000 SUBTOTAL $6,200 7 Common Space - Miscellaneous Building Equipment/Furnishings 7.1 Lobby Furnishings $8,000 7.2 Trash Receptacles, Signage, Display Cases SUBTOTAL $5,000 $13,000 1 SUBTOTAL SCHEMATIC F&E COST ESTIMATE $204,450 15% CONTINGENCY $30,668 TOTAL $235,118 IHobbs + Black Associates, Inc. Section 7, Page 5 ADD FOR FUTURE: 1 Swimming Pool 1.1 Removable Access Ramp $9,000 1.2 Bleachers $10,000 1.3 Miscellaneous Pool Equipment $6,300 SUBTOTAL $25,300 2 Library 2.1 2.2 2.3 SUBTOTAL $0 SUBTOTAL FURTURE SCHEMATIC F&E COSTS $25,300 15% CONTINGENCY $3,795 TOTAL $29,095 Hobbs + Black Associates, Inc. Section 7, Page 6 i i H rl 1p 1 SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER i PRELIMINARY DESIGN PROJECT NO.95-303 i FUNDING SOURCES i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 . i 1 iHOBBS + BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC. SECTION 8, PAGE 1 1 TO: ' FROM: DATE: ( ITY OF LANSING Interoffice Communication Sandra Allen, Co -Chair, SSCC Committee Greg Koessel, Internal Auditor January 17, 1996 SUBJECT: SSCC Costs To date a total of $2,960,000 has been dedicated by council policy for construction of a southside community center. This figure includes $550,000 from Park Millage revenues dedicated in May, 1993 (to be ' available by 6-30-96), $1,910.000 from Civic Center sale proceeds dedicated in May, 1994, and an additional $500,000 from Park Millage revenues dedicated in the FY 96-97 council budget policies. 1 n Also be advised $127,100 from the sale of a portion of Prigooris Park has been receipted and awaits programming by the city, and that, all things remaining equal, an additional $400,000 will likely be received from the sale of other Prigooris Park property. Current policy requires that proceeds from the sale of park property be dedicated to reinvestment in park facilities. It is also my understanding that the proceeds from the sale of Prigooris Park must, via deed restriction, be utilized to honor the Prigooris family Initial operating costs are estimated to be $261,000. This figure includes 2 programmers (level 30, step 3). a clerk (level 22, step 3), a custodial position (level 100, step 7), and $34,000 for contractual program instruction. This figure also includes $33,000 for supplies, $36,000 for utilities, and $10.000 in overtime for both program and maintenance staff. These costs are representative of current staffing levels and program activity at other community centers. At your direction I have determined that $48,350 is included in the current year budget for programming -at Miller Road, $30,000 of which was appropriated by council from Park Millage revenues for youth programs. In addition, council appropriated an additional $42,000 from Park Millage revenue for a new fulltime youth coordinator that could be assigned to a new facility. Finally, revenues, both building rental and program fees, are estimated to be approximately $25,000 annually. again consistent with other centers. Overall, $145,350 of the $261.000 operating cost identified in the proceeding paragraph could be covered with currently available resources combined with facility revenues, leaving incremental costs of $115,650. I 1 Lansing Southside Community Center Potential Grant Sources August 29, 1995 Over the recent years there have been several governmental grant programs -which have been utilized by communities to help fund community centers. Unfortunately at this time these appear to be no longer available. These sources have been summarized below: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Quality of Life Bond Funds These funds were from the proceeds of the approval of the statewide bond issue P and were utilized over the recent years to help fund several community centers as well as park projects. These funds have been used up and are no longer available. A subsequent bond issue has not been placed on the ballot for approval by Michigan voters at this time. Michigan Department of Natural Resources Land and Water Conservation Funds ' These are federally supported grant funds which have been dwindling each year. The focus of the expenditures continues to focus on outdoor recreation projects. ' Michigan Department of Natural Resources Natural Resources Trust Funds These funds are utilized for recreation projects but emphasis is on outdoor trail systems, access to significant resources, and outdoor education. ' Michigan Department of Commerce Rebuild Michigan Funds 9 P 9 These funds have been utilized recently to fund community centers within the state. However, these grants have been specially announced grant programs for very low income areas and are not presently available. It is unknown if this program will be offered again. The Washington Park area would not qualify on an income basis for this program. ' Community Block Grant Development Funds The City of Lansing does receive federal Community Block Grant Funds through the State. These funds are administered by Planning and Neighborhood Development. ' However, the Washington Park area does not qualify on an income basis, and all funds which the City receives have been committed at this time. 1 F� 0 OTHER GRANTS- Michigan Foundations The following sources were identified in the "Directory of Building and Equipment Grants." ANR Foundation, Detroit, Michigan One Woodward Avenue Detroit, MI 48226 (313) 965-1200 Contact: James F. Cordes, President Building and equipment grants. Performing arts; libraries; colleges and universities; elderly; women; hospitals; health organizations; community development; renovation ' grants. ' Bauervic-Paisley Foundation 2855 Coolidge Highway, Suite 103 Troy, MI 48084 Contact: The Board of Directors Building and equipment grants. Health organizations; religious organizations; ' recreation; youth organizations; renovation grants. Dorothy U. Dalton Foundation, Inc. ' Old Kent Bank of Kalamazoo 151 E. Michigan Avenue Kalamazoo, MI 49007 (616) 383-6958 Contact: Ronald N. Kilgore, Secretary/Treasurer ' Building and equipment grants. Disabled; social welfare; colleges and universities; cultural organizations; hospitals; youth organizations; museums; community development; renovation grants. ' Herbert H. and Grace A. Dow Foundation ' P.O. Box 2184 Midland, MI 48641 (517) 636-2482 Contact: Herbert H. Dow, President Building and equipment grants. Hospitals; Nature Center; colleges and universities; community development; social welfare; youth organizations; recreation. General Motors Foundation, Inc. 13-145 General Motors Bldg. 3044 W. Grand Blvd. Detroit, MI 48202 (313) 556-4260 Contact: J. J. Nowicki, Manager Building and equipment grants. Grants given in areas of company operations. ' Colleges and universities; social welfare; health organizations; disabled; youth organizations; cultural organizations; museums; community development; science; Food Banks. ' Rollin M. Gerstacker Foundation P.O. Box 1945 ' Midland, MI 48640 (517) 631-6097 Contact: E. N. Brandt, Vice President Buildingand equipment rants. Disabled; cultural organizations; community 9 � 9 � Y development; health organizations; elderly; youth organizations; colleges and ' universities. Herrick Foundation ' 2500 Comerica Building Detroit, MI 48226 ' (313) 963-6420 Contact: Kenneth G. Herrick, President Building and equipment grants. Grants issued to organizations located throughout Michigan. Cultural organizations; health organizations; Protestant organizations; colleges and universities; secondary education; physically disabled; recreation. ' James and Lynelle Holden Fund 1026 Buhl Building ' Detroit, MI 48226 -- (313) 962-4757 Contact: Joseph Freedman, President ' Buildingand equipment grants. Health organizations, medical schools, minorities, elderly; cultural organizations. 11 11 F- 7 1 1 Kantzler Foundation 900 Center Avenue Bay City, MI 48708 (517) 892-0591 Contact: Robert D. Sarow, Secretary Building and equipment grants. Community development; recreation; health organizations; women; youth organizations; social welfare. Kresge Foundation 3215 W. Big Beaver Road P.O. Box 3151 Troy, MI 48007 (313) 643-9630 Contact: Alfred H. Taylor, Jr., Chairman Building and equipment grants. Disabled; hospitals; libraries; museums; cultural organizations; zoos; child welfare; colleges and universities (all areas of interest with an emphasis on building grants); social welfare; science; elderly; recreation; youth organizations; minorities; women; environment; challenge grants; renovation grants. Skillman Foundation 333 W. Fort Street, Suite 1350 Detroit, MI 48226 (313) 961-8850 Contact: Lisa M. Kaichen, Program Officer Building and equipment grants. Child welfare; health organizations; mentally disabled; cultural organizations; performing arts; elderly; social welfare; community development; colleges and universities; minorities; youth organizations; hospitals; employment programs; education; recreation; religious organizations; YMCA. Charles J. Strosacker Foundation P.O. Box 2164 Midland, MI 48641 Building grants. Performing arts; child welfare; educational organizations; mentally and physically disabled; elderly; religious organizations; recreation. Harry A. and Margaret D. Towsley Foundation 670 City Center Building ' 220 E. Huron Street Ann Arbor, MI 48104 Contact: Margaret Ann Riecker, President Building and equipment grants. Health organizations; medicine; social welfare; child welfare; elderly (transportation). ' Whirlpool Foundation 2000 M-63 Benton Harbor, MI 49022 (616) 926-3461 Contact: Sharron Krieger, Executive Director ' and equipment rants. Grants given in areas of company operations. Social Buildingg welfare; cultural organizations; physically and mentally disabled; colleges and ' universities; community development. . Lansing Foundation ' Special public service projects in the Lansing area. �I .1 I IJ i i t 1 SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER PRELIMINARY DESIGN PROJECT No. 95-303 CONCLUSION There is a strong possibility that total funding for this complete project may not be available at this time. Therefore, the schematic plan has been designed so that the Community Center may be completed in phases. The complete project can be looked at as a master plan of which components may be prioritized and completed in phases as funds are available. The schematic design cost estimate is broken down in a manner so that components (building areas) of the building may be subtracted from the total project cost to achieve a project that may be built with funds available. The remaining building components can then be added back as funds become available in the future. The "Administration" and "Common Space" components must remain as the core components with any option chosen. t 1 HOBBS + BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC. SECTION 9, PAGE 1 i 1 IP 10 1 1 APPENDIX A i 1 i 1 i SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER STUDY CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN iOctober 1996 1 DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS 1 i PREPARED BY 1 JAMES R. SPACKMAN, AICP FOR HOBBS + BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC. 215 S. Washington - Suite 120 Lansing, Michigan 48933 1 1 SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER STUDY CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN October 12, 1995 GENERAL STATEMENT DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS SCHEDULE I - Alternative Site Profile Briefs SCHEDULE II - City of Lansing Census Tract Profiles SCHEDULE III - City -Wide Baseline Statistics SCHEDULE IV - City of Lansing Demographic Profile 1 1 1 'J 1 SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER STUDY CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN OCTOBER 1995 GENERAL STATEMENT The demographic characteristics presented in this narrative are for the area surrounding the selected site of the proposed Southside Community Center.* The site selected for the community center is the South Washington Park located at the approximate geographic center of the City of Lansing. This site has a diversity of people and housing within its close -in service area. The demographics were examined for the area within a one -mile radius and included seven census tracts, numbers 20, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 37. Eleven data items were selected for this area analysis from the 1990 U.S. Census of Lansing. The selected characteristics were believed to be the most significant of all the population and housing variables in the census data. These characteristics could assist in determining the location of the such a center by 1) identifying a neighboring potential user population, and 2) identifying the neighborhood characteristics upon which a community center could have an impact. The demographic analysis uses the city-wide census data to describe the characteristics of the study area in relation to the entire city. Demographic profiles of the other three locations (Kendon Park, Everett High School and McKinch Park) considered for the proposed community center have been appended to this report. Maps, City of Lansing 1990 U.S. Census data, and Census Tract information for the individual tracts used in the demographic analysis are also attached to this study.* DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS Population: The racial composition of the study area reveals that over 84 percent of the population is white. This is substantially higher than the city's norm. Census tract number 20 to the northeast of the proposed ' *DATA SOURCES: 1) 1990 Census of Population and Housing, City of Lansing, Michigan, U.S. Census Bureau, 1990. 2) Demographic Study, City of Lansing, 1995 Five -Year Recreation Plan, Landscape Architects & Planners, East Lansing, MI, 1995. 1 Acre: 1 ' Household Characteristics: I 11 Page 2 site is the only tract which has a minority residency that is lower than the city-wide average. The median age of the population in this study_ area is 31.9 which exceeds the city norm by 2 years. The area to the northeast shows a younger than average age (24 years) age for the population. The overall area had fewer youth/children under age 18 than the city norm, showing only 25.8 percent of total population. City wide, it was 27.4 percent of the total population. Approximately 16 percent of the population was over age 60, the city average is 13 percent. There are approximately 10,500 households in this study area. The household composition of married couples for the entire area is slightly above the norm. However, female - headed households equal the city average. It should be noted that two of the tracts show -significantly higher female heads of households. Education: The educational level of residents throughout the study area appears on a norm with the city average of 21 percent with no high school diploma and 26 percent high school graduates. This area has fewer persons completing a college degree although the percentage of persons that had attended college was nearly that of the city. There were a large number of youth not enrolled in elementary and high school. Employment: The area appears to have about the same employment characteristics as the city as a whole. There is fairly low unemployment in the study area and a high percentage of the households where both parents are in the work force. Income: The income characteristics of the area suggest that most families are in the middle income ranges. Five of the seven census tracts indicate that household were definitely above the city-wide household median income level of $26,400, while two were considerably lower than this median. 11 1 1 1� Paae 3 Poverty Status: The city-wide population below the poverty level amounted to about 19 percent. Two of the tracts show that 23 percent and 36 percent of the persons within those tracts as being below poverty level. The other five tracts appear to be well under the poverty level. Vehicle Available: The average households without a vehicle available for the study area was calculated to be slightly over 5 percent of the total households. Census tract 37 showed 18 percent of the households with no automobile. Housing Units: The predominate type of housing unit is the single-family, owner -occupied residence. Census tracts 20 and 37 have high renter housing units in both single and multiple family types of dwellings. The majority of housing units in the immediate vicinity and to the north area were built prior to 1949 and, to the south and west, most of the housing was constructed since the 1960s. Stability: The study area appears to reflect a general stability with the majority of residents remaining in their homes for in excess of ten years. Mobility: The area is characterized as being highly mobile with very few disabled persons. SCHEDULE I ALTERNATIVE SITE PROFILE BRIEFS CITY OF LANSING 1995 PARRS STUDY m m m m m m r r m= m m r m m m= m %44b _ tlffp- COMMUNITY PLANNING SERVICES/HOBBS AND BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC RECOMMENDED COMMUNITY CENTER SITE m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Ao 1701 �•` ••'••i : �'•`� ® oar �� , — ry - ° -- ( ---- ❑�� eF-1 s ®tea © �„nC ; xr. HOPE JU(LS�Q��1 _` ss. nOsi atril. I U®® LllJ�a , 4 r� S. MANN PARR love'A , - .06,- — -- � (loll. HOL1Rs Row J W ; SVSRBTT HIGD. H �� v SCHOOLh r„ . j� ` a o� ► � I RENDON PARR "Z \ _ CAVARAUGE — two ,. \ 1.2 2.,..*.;, � � ,. a �� � JOLLY ROAD �� 51 MCRINCH PARR a� L A4 JL 001 11I °0 . n"m nowJE c� ,� 0D 1990 U . S . CENSUS TRACTS 53. 'CITY OF C li IG SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER STUDY - 1995 _ Js—_ �nrFc�nrr ! rMiTS LANSING COMMUNITY PLANNING SERVICES/HOBBS AND BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC. ALTERNATIVE COMMUNITY CENTER SITES ' PROPOSED SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER STUDY ' EYERETT HIGH SCHOOL Park Classification: Unclassified as a park, but serves an area similar to a community wide park. Census Tracts: 23, 26,.27, 28 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF ' Race: Predominate White (91.11r)/Minority (7.996). I Household Characteristics: Families: Married couples (50.7%); only 11.501 female headed households Children: Below norm (23.7°s of population). Age: Older (median 33.0 yrs) with 13.80 age 65 and older. Education: Norm ' Employment: Norm Income: Above norm (Per Capita of $13,703). Housing: 85% single family; 73% owners. Neighborhood Stability: Stable Mobility: Low mobility limitations. Unusual or Unique Characteristics * High levels of Social Security Income (26%) and retirement income (20a in community. ' * Only 8.7% overall poverty. Source: City of Lansing, Demographic Study, 1995 Five -Year ' Recreation Plan. ' PROPOSED SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER STUDY ' R}3NDON PARR Park Classification: Community ' Census Tracts: 27, 28, 29.01, 29.02, 53.04 ' IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF ' Race: Above the city norm - White (83.6) Household Characteristics: Families: Above norm for married ' couples. Children: Below city norm (22.216 of population) . ' Age: Norm (Median is 30.1) - Education: Norm: More college than public ' school students. Employment: High labor force participation - ' both men and women. Income: Above norm (Per Capita of $13,989) ' Housing: Split between S.F./M.F. - main construction since 1970. Neighborhood Stability: Low stability, high movement. Mobility: Below norm limitations. Unusual or Unique Characteristics * High percent of college students out of all students in the area (50.2U * Half of population foreign born, enter U.S. since 1980 * Low(er) poverty levels - all groupings * High non -family households (42.3%) Source: City of Lansing, Demographic Study, 1995 Five -Year Recreation Plan. PROPOSED SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER SITE =INCH PARK Park Classification: Neighborhood Census Tracts: 51, 52.01 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: Higher than city average minority population especially in C.T. 51. Household Characteristics: High # of family households headed T by single mothers. Children: More than the city norm. Age: Slightly younger (Median Age 28.5) Education: Above city norm H.S. grads - below norm for college grads. Employment: Above norm labor force participation for all groups. Income: Lower than City norm (Per Capita $11,378). Housing: Predominate single family and owner occupied - 60% built in 1960's- 80's. Neighborhood Stability: Good stability. Mobility: Good mobility. Unusual or Unique Characteristics * High percentage of children in school * Low Poverty: all groups * 93s multi -car owners * High neighborhood stability Source: City of Lansing, Demographic Study, 1995 Five -Year Recreation Plan. �I SCHEDULE II ' CITY OF LANSING CENSUS TRACT PROFILES 1990 U.S. CENSUS a%Tz t�'e- 2( q6ttlim Ifiw• 17.01 J � 1111 U_�/ �, mr. HOPE Avg. 51U -- HOLIES ROAD Is n. jJOLLY R071D •`�"lb �. ' Nv B \ I r-• I SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER STUDY — 1995 L ..J�-� 11 ORPORATr i. r"iTc COMMUNITY PLANNING SERVICES/HOBBS AND BLACK ASSOCIATES, INC. 29. 4 I a r� Rim .� 1990 �i, U.S. CENSUS TRACTS SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER LOCATION STUDY CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN POPULATION October 9, 1995 Population /Geographic Census Tract Descrir�tion Area � �� Total Pop. 4265 1841 3605 Percent Black. 19.1°6 0.8% 2.916 Percent Hispanic 12.116 2.396 4.716 Age: Under 5 473 190 297 5-17 901 248 529 18-24 547 123 270 25-59 1981 907 1769 60-74 243 217 460 75 over 110 156 280 Total Households (HH) 1679 792 1561 # of Families 951 518 951 Married Couples 480 425 770 Female Headed HH 385 83 147 Average Pers/HH 2.54 2.32 2.31 Average Income $16,890 $34,527 $31,563 Percent Poverty 37.5% 5.6?6 4.816 No Vehicle Avail. 434 36 127 Total Housing 1860 811 1619 o Owner 35.70 84.40 81.90-0 °s Renter 64.3% 17.2% 18.1'; Vacancy Rate Sales 2.1% 0.9% 1.0% °; Rental 8.2% 3.2% 2.116 Type Housing 1 Family 938 766 1492 2 & more 877 45 128 1 SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER LOCATION STUDY ' CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN POPULATION ' October 9, 1995 Population /Geographic Total Pop. 885 Percent Black 7.5% Percent Hispanic 0.29k Age: Under 5 34 5-17 87 18-24 38 25-59 385 60-74 216 75 over 125 Total Households (HH) 422 # of Families 283 Married Couples 259 Female Headed HH 21 Average Pers/HH 2.01 Average Income $46,510 Percent Poverty 3.71; No Vehicle Available 18 Total Housing 440 Owner 85.3% Renter 14.7°; Vacancy Rate °s Sales 1.4s s Rental 1.61k Type Housing 1 Family 312 2 & more 128 Census Tract Iza as .21 .2UL 2& 3907 3563 2550 2404 17.9% 10.4% 4.4% 4.315 3.6% 6.116 3.516 7.9% 221 328 187 210 689 637 393 374 399 349 162 253 1923 1733 1351 1179 520 349 349 238 165 167 208' 150 1571 1408 1090 1016 1093 923 725 608 894 674 592 463 165 485 365 121 2.49 2.53 2.34 2.36 $38,881 $30,816 $33,338 $26,997 6.6% 12.316 6.116 17.6% 44 107 45 86 1623 1480 1120 1059 75.00-. 74.9% 89.4% 60.096 25.016 25.1% 10.06 40.0% 1.0% 3.1% 1.1% 2.40-o 4.0% 6.1�; 6.5% 3.1% 1097 1313 1070 803 426 167 50 256 SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER LOCATION STUDY CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN POPULATION October 9, 1995 Population Geographic Census Tract Descrivtion Area -2 .�7 Total Pop. 3371 2891 4312 4075 6058 Percent Black 6.816 4.91; 43.9% 31.0% 15.9% Percent Hispanic 5.2% 4.796 7.1% 6.716 6.3% Age: Under 5 271 258 396 483 536 5-17 569 398 1027 939 1097 18-24 294 275 482 505 617 25-59 1685 1405 2059 1799 2754 60-74 410 420 283 276 712 75 over 140 135 65 73 332 Total Households (HH) 1326 1236 1354 1419 2429 # of Families 933 832 1137 1069 1548 Married Couples 722 653 773 602 1041 Female Headed HH 175 148 297 410 419 Average Pers/HH 2.54 2.34 3.18 2.87 2.45 Average Income $32,869 $32,229 $37,759 $21,451 $23,596 Percent Poverty 9.71; 5.21k 16.3!s 25.31k 20.7% No Vehicle Available 82 72 112 201 435 Total Housing 1367 1278 1378 1465 2534 °s Owner 82.506 73.0% 81.096 50.6% 54.3�; Renter 17.515 27.016 19.0% 49.401 45.70 Vacancy Rate Sales 0.8?6 0.9% 0.8% 1.60-0 1.0% 96 Rental 6.5% 5.4% 1.9% 2.8% 5.916 Type Housing 1 Family 1249 1056 1245 1195 1624 2 & more 118 222 133 270 910 SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER LOCATION STUDY CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN POPULATION October 9, 1995 Population / Geographic Census Tract Descrifltion Area �Q Total Pop. 3310 3406 Percent Black 12.2% 12.9%s Percent Hispanic 5.096 4.1% Age: Under 5 297 196 5-17 518 188 18-24 310 1299 25-59 1747 1636 60-74 269 67 75 over 169 20 Total Households (HH) 1201 1790 # of Families 813 588 Married Couple 636 416 Female headed HH 139 118 Average Pers/HH 2.60 1.90 Average Icome $37,616 $25,052 Percent Poverty 6.9% 12.9015 No Vehicle Avail. 33 33 Total Housing 1243 1946 s Owner 61.3% 4.0% Renter 38.7% 96.0% Vacancy Rate s Sales 1.2% 0 01 Rental 5.1% 7.3P6 Type Housing 1 Family 908 185 2 & more 335 1751 SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER LOCATION STUDY CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN POPULATION October 9, 1995 Population /Geographic Census Tract Descrinti ors/ Area U AZ.-U �Q � Total Pop. 3384 4750 4878 3564 3004 Percent Black 31.516 14.116 9.6% 22.806 5.9% Percent Hispanic 10.116 5.8% 6.21; 5.316 3.996 Age: Under 5 5-17 18-24 25-59 60-74 75 over Total Households (HH) # of Families Married Couple Female Headed HH Average Pers/HH Average Income Percent Poverty No Vehicle Avail. Total Housing % Owner % Renter Vacancy Rate % Sales Rental Type Housing 1 Family 2 & more 363 $29,904 433 369 424 245 847 1015 934 554 422 348 496 416 459 360 1607 2401 2349 1750 1596 167 310 436 192 306 52 95 274 85 75 1095 1842 2075 1489 1314 858 1312 1194 888 808 558 798 930 519 625 265 443 211 307 141 3.09 2.58 2.35 2.34 2.29 $26,943 $27,143 $26,796 - 19.616 13.216 11.6% 18.1% - 129 91 248 154 - 1160 1874 2255 1635 1355 69.5% 48.8% 52.996 23.8% 48.3% 30.5% 51.2% 47.116 76.2% 51.7% 1.7% 0.3% 1.0°6 0 0.6% 6.2% 1.70-o 10.8% 10.8% 3.1% 1015 1492 1245 604 572 145 382 1010 1031 783 1 11 1 SCHEDULE III CITY-WIDE BASELINE STATISTICS CITY OF LANSING PARRS STUDY 1995 CITY-WIDE BASELINE STATISTICS The following is a synopsis of the Lansing City census data' against which all the data of the tracts and parks were compared: 1. POPULATION - 5.2 % more females than males 2. HOUSEHOLDS - median age 29.7 Married couples households 42.0 % Non -family households 37.9 % Single -parent households 20.1 % 3. RACIAL MIX - whites/blacks 92.5 % White 73.9 % Black 18.6 % All other 7.5 % Hispanic origin 7.9 % 4. .HOUSING - Overall Housing Utilization Vacant housing 6.1 % Occupied housing 93.9 % Owner occupied 51.4 % Single-family housing is 66.8 % of total Occupancy by Race: Whites 2.36 persons/household Blacks 2.92 American Indian/Aleut 3.15 Asian/Pacific Isl. 4.12 Other 3.59 Hispanic 3.60 Complete city-wide census profile statistics are found at Tab 4 4. HOUSING - continued IStructures ' Average units constructed during decade 1940-1980: 8,618 Units constructed during 1980's: 4,957 Neighborhood Stability 56 % of residents moved into their home since 1985 69 % of residents moved into their home since 1980 ('The movement rate since 1985 is the equivalent of everyone moving approximately once every 9 years) ' Miscellaneous 5.7 % of households have no phone 13.3 % of households have no car 1/3 of homeowners have no mortgage Housing costs as % of household income 14.7 % of homeowners pay more than 30 % of household income 41.2 % of renters pay more than 30 % of household income 5. EDUCATION 29.7 % of residents are in school - and 34.7 % of those are in college. This means that 1 in 10 residents of Lansing is a college student. 21.7 % of residents age 25 + never graduated from high school: 18.4 % graduated from college with a BA or advanced degree 6. DISABILITIES - (non -institutionalized persons) Age 16-64: 1 in 18 ( 5.5 %) with personal disability Age 16-64: 1 in 10 (10.7%) with work disability Age 65+: 3 in 13 (23.0%) with personal disability Age 65+: 2 in 11 (18.1 %) have mobility disability 7. PLACE OF BIRTH Only 3.1 % born outside the U.S., but of those, 41.2 % came to Lansing during the 1980's 8. CHILDREN a 10. City had 34,912 children under age 18 - (27.4% of total population) Children under age six: 60.3 % of mothers are in the labor force. In 57.2 % of families with children under six, all parents work. For children between six and seventeen: 75.3 % of mothers are in the labor force. In 67.4 % of these families, all parents work. Teenagers: city-wide, 548 (8.3 %) of all persons age 16-19 are not in school, have not graduated, and are unemployed (or are not in the labor force) Children and poverty: See section 10 below LABOR FORCE 2/3 white collar workers; 1/3 blue collar Rank of employers by % of workers Retail trade 19.1 % Manufacturing (durable goods) 11.6 % Public administration 11.4 % Educational services 10.0 % Health occupations 7.7% 59.8 % Overall 69 % of persons age 16+ are in the labor force and 31 % are not. For men a little higher; women a little lower. INCOME / POVERTY Per Capita Income: $12,232 Percentage in poverty: All ages: 19.4 % Age 65 + 11.4 % Children age 5-17 25.2% Children under 5 29.9 % w/Female head of household: Children age 5-17 53.2% Children under 5 66.0 % SCHEDULE IV ' CITY OF LANSING DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE CITY OF LANSING 1995 PARRS STUDY 1990 U.S. CENSUS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . !o, 1 1 1 1 1 LANSING 1990 CENSUS TRACTS 33.01 32 ' ' 31.02 33.02 1 --•-•------ 2 - - - � 3 .� 8 9 34 '- 5 31.0 3d.01 7 4 6 10 13 65 35 14 16 15 19 12 =--f �•-• 21 20 24 22 17.02 25 23 29.01 44.01 ----; 26 -•- r � 37 ?.02 36.01 36.02 27 28 214 51 52.01 53.03 52.02 5.01 6 29.02 53. 53.02 NORTH CITY OF LANSING PARK STUDY City of Lansing Base Demographic Data LANSING TOTALS $ POPULATION: - MALE 60351 47.4 FEMALE 66970 52.6 127321 100.0 AGE UNDER 5 11702 9.2 5 TO 17 23212 18.2 18 TO 20 5712 4.5 21 TO 24 9940 7.8 25 TO 44 45521 35.8 45 TO 54 10437 8.2 55 TO 59 4359 3.4 60 TO 64 4268 3.4 65 TO 74 7088 5.6 75 TO 84 3878 3.0 85 PLUS 1205 0.9 TOTAL 127322 100.0 MEDIAN AGE 29.7 UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE 34912 % OF TOTAL POPULATION 27.4 AGE 65 OR OLDER 12171 % OF TOTAL POPULATION 9.6 LANSING CITY $ ' HOUSEHOLDS: TOTAL 50635 ' FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS MARRIED COUPLE HSLDS 31428 21270 62.1 42.0 MALE HEAD OF HSLD 1761 3.5 FEMALE HEAD OF HSLD 8397 16.6 ' NONFAMILY HOUSEHOLDS 19207 37.9 HOUSEHOLDER LIVES ALONE 14740 29.1 HOUSEHOLDER 65+ 4264 8.4 PERSONS LIVING IN HOUSEHOLDS 126428 PERSONS/HOUSEHOLD 2.5 GROUP QUARTERS TOTAL LIVING IN GROUP QTRS 893 ' INSTITUTIONALIZED 582 OTHERS 311 RACE: ' WHITE 94135 73.9 BLACK 23626 18.6 AMER. INDIAN./ALEUT 1295 1.0 ' ASIAN 2263 1.8 OTHER RACE 6002 4.7 ' TOTAL $ 100.0 HISPANIC ORIGIN 10112 7.9 1 ' Lansing Park study N TOTAL HOUSING UNITS: TOTAL OCCUPIED TOTAL VACANT OWNER OCCUPIED RENTER OCCUPIED OWNER VACANCY RATE RENTAL VACANCY PERSONS PER OWNER UNIT PERSONS PER RENTAL UNIT UNITS W/OVER 1 PERSON/ROOM LIVING UNITS IN STRUCTURE 1 UNIT DETACHED 1 UNIT ATTACHED 2 TO 4 UNITS 5 TO 9 UNITS 10 PLUS UNITS MOBILE VALUE OF HOUSING STOCK OWNER OCCUPIED MEDIAN VALUE MEDIAN RENT OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY RACE WHITE BLACK AMER IND/ALEUT ASIAN/PACIFIC ISLAND OTHER RACE HISPANIC (ANY RACE) TOTAL UNITS URBAN V. RURAL POPULATION URBAN POP - RURAL TOTAL LANSING CITY 53919 50635 93.9 3284 6.1 27737 51.4 22898 42.5 1.5 6.8 2.64 2.33 1731 3.4 32979 61.2 3023 5.6 5639 10.5 2369 4.4 8481 15.7 1428 2.6 100.0 48400 356 39902 78.8 8104 16.0 411 0.8 547 1.1 1671 3.3 2812 ------------------ 50635 100.0 127321 0 127321 Lansing Park Study 3 ' LANSING CITY $ SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 3 YRS + AND IN SCHOOL 37857 100.0 PREPRIMARY 2618 6.9 ELEM / HIGH 22119 58.4 ' $ IN PRIVATE ELM/HIGH COLLEGE 9.6 13120 34.7 EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT (25+) TOTAL POP AGE 25 OR OLDER 77268 100.0 LESS THAN 9TH GRADE EDUC. 5235 6.8 ' 19 12 GRADE W/O DIPLOMA ----------------- TOTAL TOTAL A/O H.B. DIPLOMA 16756 21.7 HS GRAD 19998 25.9 SOME COLLEGE 20289 26.3 ASSOC. DEG. 6066 7.9 BACHELOR'S 9318 12.1 ' GRAD —PROF DRGEE 4841 6.3 FIVE (5) YEAR MOBILITY STUDY TOTAL POP AGE 5 AND OLDER 115656 100.0 LIVED IN SAME HOUSE 55709 48.2 LIVED IN DIFF HOUSE IN U.S. 58655 50.7 ' SAME STATE 50781 43.9 SAME COUNTY 37156 32.1 DIFFERENT COUNTY 13625 11.8 DIFFERENT STATE 7874 6.8 ' LIVED ABROAD 1292 1.1 DISABILITY SECTION: CIVILIAN NONINSTITUTIONALIZED PERSONS PERSONS AGES 16 TO 64 82712 —WITH A MOBILITY OR SELF CARE LIMITATION 4571 5.5 — MOBILITY 2051 2.5 — SELF CARE 3409 4.1 ' A — WITH WORK DISABILITY 8837 10.7 — IN THE LABOR FORCE 4021 4.9 — PREVENTED FROM WORKING 3950 4.8 PERSONS 65 YRS AND OLDER 11914 W/ LIMITATION. 2735 23.0 MOBILITY LIMITATION 2157 18.1 ' SELF —CARE LIMITATION 1581 13.3 1 Lansing Park Study 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 CHILDREN BORN PER 1,000 WOMEN WOMEN 15 TO 24 WOMEN 25 TO 34 WOMEN 35 TO 44 VETERAN STATUS CIVILIAN VETERAN AGE 16+ 65 YEARS AND OVER PLACE OF BIRTH BORN IN U.S.A. BORN IN MICHIGAN(%) FOREIGN BORN ENTERED U.S. 1980-90 Lansing Park Study LANSING CITY $ 441 1320 1951 11972 2739 123322 75.9 3999 1648 96.9 3.1 41.2 F.1 LANSING CITY $ TOTAL LABOR FORCE STATUS PERSONS 16 AND OVER 95498 it IN LABOR FORCE 65884 69.0 CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE 65611 UNEMPLOYED 5522 8.4 ARMED FORCES ' 273 NOT IN LABOR FORCE 29614 31.0 MALE LABOR FORCE STATUS TOTAL MALES AGE 16+ 44304 IN LABOR FORCE 34508 77.9 CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE 34277 UNEMPLOYED 3186 9.3 ARMED FORCES 231 NOT IN LABOR FORCE 9796 22.1 FEMALE LABOR FORCE STATUS TOTAL FEMALES AGE 16+ 51194 IN LABOR FORCE 31376 61.3 CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE 31334 UNEMPLOYED 2336 7.5 ARMED FORCES 42 NOT IN LABOR FORCE 19818 38.7 WITH OWN CHILDREN < 6YRS 9432 18.4 IN LABOR FORCE 60.3 AS NUMBER 5687 W/ OWN CHLDRN 6 TO 17YRS 7572 14.8 % IN LABOR FORCE 75.3 % AS NUMBER 5702 OWN CHILDREN UNDER 6 YRS IN FAMILIES & SUBFAMILIES 13386 ALL PARENTS IN LBR FCE 7658 57.2 OWN CHILDREN 6 TO 17 YEARS IN FAMILIES & SUBFAMILIES 20368 ALL PARENTS IN LBR FCE 13733 67.4 ALL PERSONS 16 - 19 YEARS 6617 NOT IN SCHL-NOT H.S. GRAD 919 13.9 EMPLYD OR ARMED FORCES 371 5.6 UNEMPLOYED 136 2.1 NOT IN LABOR FORCE 412 6.2 Lansing Park Study 6 1 1 Ij LANSING CITY $ COMMUTING TO WORK SURVEY POPULATION 58801 $ DROVE ALONE 77.3 $ IN CARPOOLS 12.4 % PUBLIC TRANSIT 3 $ USING OTHER MEANS 0.8 $ WALKED/WORKED HOME 6.2 MEAN TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) 17.3 EMPLOYED PERSONS AGE 16+ 60089 OCCUPATION EXECUTIVE AND MGMT 6689 11.1 PROFESSIONAL SPECIALTY 7613 12.7 TECHNICIANS AND RELATED 2428 4.0 SALES 6513 10.8 ADMIN SUPPORT/CLERICAL 11718 19.5 PRIVATE HSLD OCCUP. 235 0.4 PROTECTIVE SERVICES 1255 2.1 SERVICE (EX PROTECT+HSLD) 8656 14.4 FARM/FOREST/FISH 568 0.9 PRECISION PROD/CRAFT/REPAIR 5531 9.2 MACH OPS, INSPECT, ASSEMBLE 4268 7.1 TRANSPORT, MAT'L MOVING 2234 3.7 HANDLERS, HELPERS, LABORERS 2381 4.0 100.0 INDUSTRY EMPLOYED PERSONS AGE 16YRS + 60089 AGRICULTURE, FOREST, FISHERIES 657 1.1 MINING 48 0.1 CONSTRUCTION 2630 4.4 MFG. (NON -DURABLE) 1705 2.8 MFG (DURABLE) 6972 11.6 TRANSPORTATION 1806 3.0 COMMUNICATIONS /PUBLIC UTIL 1496 2.5 WHOLESALE TRADE 1834 3.1 RETAIL TRADE 11448 19.1 FINANCE/INS.,/REAL ESTATE 3782 6.3 BUSINESS AND -REPAIR SERVICES 3239 5.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 1887 3.1 ENTERTAINMENT/REC. SERVICES 744 1.2 HEALTH SERVICES 4598 7.7 EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 6028 10.0 OTHER PROFESSIONAL/RELATED 4358 7.3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION 6857 11.4 100.0 ILansing Park Study 7 I LANSING CITY % CLASS OF WORKER EMPLOYED PERSONS AGE 16+ 60089 PRIVATE WAGE AND SALARY 43960 73.2 1 GOVERNMENT (TOTAL) LOCAL GOVT 13347 -4204 22.2 7.0 STATE GOVT 8123 13.5 FEDERAL GOVT 1020 1.7 ' SELF-EMPLOYED 2649 4.4 UNPAID FAMILY WORKERS 133 0.2 100.0 INCOME IN 1989 ' HOUSEHOLDS 50835 100.0 LESS THAN $5000 3971 7.8 5000 TO 9999 10000 TO 14999 5553 4905 10.9 9.6 15000 TO 24999 9582 18.8 25000 TO.34999 8775 17.3 35000 TO 49999 9643 19.0 50000 TO 74999 6270 12.3 75000 TO 99999 1504 3.0 100000 TO 149999 538 1.1 150000 OR MORE 94 0.2 MED. HSLD Y ($) 26398 FAMILIES 31698 100.0 LESS THAN $5000 2011 6.3 5000 TO 9999 2837 9.0 10000 TO 14999 2295 7.2 15000 TO 24999 5227 16.5 25000 TO 34999 5321 16.8 ' 35000 TO 49999 50000 TO 74999 7165 5018 22.6 15.8 75000 TO 99999 1298 4.1 100000 TO 149999 441 1.4 150000 OR MORE 85 0.3 MED. FAM Y ($) 31576 NONFAMILY HSEHLDS 19137 100.0 ' LESS THAN $5000 2220 11.6 5000 TO 9999 2952 15.4 10000 TO 14999 15000 TO 24999 2586 4412 13.5 23.1 25000 TO 34999 3394 17.7 35000 TO 49999 2328 12.2 5000'0 TO 74999 993 5.2 75000 TO 99999 165 0.9 100000 TO 149999 78 0.4 150000 OR MORE 9 0.0 ' MED. N.F.Y ($) 18619 PER CAPITA INCOME ($) 12232 Lansing Park Study 8 LANSING CITY $ TYPES OF INCOME HOUSEHOLDS 50835 W/WAGE OR SALARY INCOME 39730 78.2 MEAN WAGE/SALARY Y ($) 31084 W/NONFARM SELF EMPLYMT Y 4564 9.0 ' MEAN NONFARM SELF EMP Y ($) 9392 W/FARM SELF EMPLYMNT Y 243 0.5 MEAN FARM SELF EMPY Y ($) 1838 ' W/SOCIAL SECURITY INCOME 10557 20.8 MEAN SOC. SEC. Y ($) 7789 W/PUBLIC ASSISTANCE INCOME 6622 13.0 MEAN PUBLIC ASST. Y ($) 4673 W/RETIREMENT Y 7682 15.1 MEAN RETIREMENT Y ($) 8055 POVERTY STATUS IN 1989 PERSONS FOR WHOM POVERTY STATUS DETERMINED ........ 126164 1 - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL 24513 19.4 PERSONS 18 AND OVER 91600 - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL 14649 16.0 PERSONS 65 AND OVER 11914 - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL 1359 11.4 RELATED CHILDREN UNDER 18 34323 - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL 9641 28.1 RELATED CHILDREN UNDER 5 11462 - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL 3535 30.8 RELATED CHILDREN 5 TO 17 22861 - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL 6106 26.7 1 UNRELATED INDIVIDUALS 27190 - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL 7004 25.8 ' ALL FAMILIES 31698 - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL 5239 16.5 W/RELATED CHILDREN UNDER 18 18151 - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL 4569 25.2 RELATED CHILDREN UNDER 5 9108 - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL 2722 29.9 FEMALE HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD 8281 - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL 3555 42.9 W/RELATED CHILDREN UNDER 18 6191 - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL 3293 53.2 RELATED CHILDREN UNDER 5 2933 - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL 1935 66.0 Lansing Park Study 9 HOUSING: - TOTAL HOUSING UNITS YEAR BUILT '1989-1990 '1985-1988 '1980-1984 '1970-1979 '1960-1969 '1950-1959 '1940-1949 11939 AN EARLIER NUMBER BEDROOMS '- 1 '- 2 '- 3 '- 5 OR MORE SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS - LACKS COMPLETE PLUMBING - LACKS COMPLETE KITCHEN - CONDOMINIUM HOUSING UNITS SOURCE OF WATER -PUBLIC SYSTEM / PRIVATE CO. -INDIVIDUAL WELL -INDIVIDUAL DUG WELL -OTHER SEWER - PUBLIC - SEPTIC/CESSPOOL - OTHER LANSING CITY 53919 426 0.8 1825 3.4 2706 5.0 8492 15.7 10632 19.7 8804 16.3 6544 12.1 14490 26.9 100.0 1068 2.0 9166 17.0 17808 33.0 19529 36.2 5527 10.3 821 1.5 53919 100.0 175 0.3 241 0.4 829 1.5 53756 99.7 156 0.3 7 0.0 0 0.0 100.0 53531 99.3 318 0.6 70 0.1 Lansing Park Study Fu OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS: YEAR MOVED INTO HOUSE/APT 1989-1990 1985-1988 1980-1984 1970-1979 1960-1969 1959 AND EARLIER NO TELEPHONE IN HOUSE CARS/ OCCUPIED HOUSING UNIT 0 - 1 2 3 OR MORE LANSING CITY $ 50635 93.9 13252 26.2 15102 29.8 6601 13.0 7446 14.7 4059 8.0 4175 8.2 100.0 2890 5.7 6752 13.3 20756 41.0 17408 34.4 5719 11.3 100.0 Lansing Park Study 11 LANSING CITY $ SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS ' - OWNER OCCUPIED UNITS 25429 - WITH MORTGAGE 17076 67.2 - W/O MORTGAGE 8353 32.8 100.0 ' MONTHLY COSTS W/MORTGAGE - LESS THAN 300 461 2.7 - 300-499 - 500-699 5295 6212 31.0 36.4 700-999 4131 24.2 - 1000-1499 863 5.1 - 1500-1999 92 0.5 -•2000 OR MORE 22 0.1 MEDIAN (DOLLARS) 584 LMONTHLY COSTS W/O MORTGAGE - LESS THAN 100 116 1.4 - 100-199 2373 28.4 I - 200-299 4205 50.3 - 300-399 1130 13.5 - 400 OR MORE 529 6.3 MEDIAN (DOLLARS) 236 8353 SELECTED OWNER COSTS AS OF 1989 HOUSEHOLD INCOME - LESS THAN 20% 15577 61.3 20 24% 3615 14.2 - 25 - 29% 2353 9.3 - 30 - 34% 895 3.5 - 35 % OR MORE 2853 11.2 - NOT COMPUTED 136 0.5 25429 100.0 GROSS RENTS OCCUPIED RENTAL UNITS 22700 100.0 - LESS THAN $200 1966 8.7 - $200 - 299 2436 10.7 ' - $300 - 499 12669 55.8 - $500 - 749 4872 21.5 - $750 - 999 328 1.4 - $1000 OR MORE 22 0.1 - NO CASH RENT 407 1.8 MEDIAN (DOLLARS) 399 GROSS RENT AS % OF 1989 HOUSEHOLD INCOME -LESS THAN 20 % 7032 31.0 - 20 TO 24 % 2951 13.0 - 25 TO 29 % 2398 10.6 - 30 TO 34 % 1548 6.8 - 35 % OR MORE 7800 34.4. - NOT COMPUTED 971 4.3 22700 100.0 ILansing Park Study 12