Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976 Physical Development Plan-Neighborhood Development Area 1Lansing Developmer` Physical Developme Development Area 1 1976 Permanent was Olin /1r .�... •�11�• . �� . ��A � � wig � �...►. PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN j� Neighborhood Development i Area 1 LANSING MICHIGAN JUNE 28,1976 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 The Physical Development Plan for Neighborhood Development Area #1 was prepared by the Lansing Planning Department and Citizen's District Council #1. The preparation of this plan was financed through a federal ' grant from the Housing and Urban Development Department under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. We wish to thank and acknowledge the following individuals and City Departments and Agencies for their assistance in the preparation of the Physical Development Plan. Mayor Gerald W. Graves City Council Louis F. Adado William A. Brenke Richard J. Baker Jack D. Gunther Lucile E. Belen Robert J. Hull James D. Blair Terry J. Mc Kane, Mayor Pro Tem Planning Board Merle Barnhart Emly Horne Gordon Cornwell James Nelson Richard Gaus Edward Remick Sr. Juanita Gonzales Citizen's District Council #1 Mr. Anthony Brown *Mr. Walter Kron *Mr."Gregory Byrd Mrs. Edrie Findsen Mrs. Rosa Chinn Mrs. Ocie Hall Mrs. Beulah Cross Mr. Boyd Lewis Mrs. Bernice Davenport Mrs. Jean Ruffin Mrs. Lela Eaton Mr. William Smith *MP. Clyde Henson Mrs. Mattie Taylor *Mr. Lawrence Hinton City Departments and Agencies Board of Water and Light Building Department Finance Department Fire Department Housing and Redevelopment Department Law Department Office of Community Development Management Parks and Recreation Department Planning Department Public Service Department Traffic Department *Resigned TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Page I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 II. DEFINITION OF TERMS 3 III. INTRODUCTION 4 IV. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES 6 A. Federal Development Objectives and Requirements 6 B. City of Lansing: Development Objectives and ' Requirements 7 C. City Needs, Area Designations, and Proposed Results 8 V. NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA #1: AREA PROFILE 11 A. Geographical Location 11 B. Legal Area Descriptions 11 C. People in NDA #1 13 D. Land Use 15 E. Housing 24 F. Public Facilities 29 G. Environmental Conditions 31 VI. NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA #1: PROPOSALS 33 A. Physical Program Recommendations 33 B. Estimated Physical Development Program Costs 48 C. Future Land Use 50 D. Physical Program Implementation and Relocation 57 APPENDIX ' Exhibit #1 Neighborhood Rehabilitation Standards Al Exhibit #2 Estimated Costs A6 Exhibit #3 Rehabilitation Loans and Grants Program All LIST OF MAPS Page #1 Neighborhood Development Areas 10 #2 NDA #1 and CDC Area #1 14 #3 Existing Land Use 17 #4 Zoning 19 #5 Street Classification 21 #6 Land Use Surrounding NDA #1 23 #7 Property Acquisition - Structures 39 #7a Property Acquisition - Parcels 40 #7b Property Acquisition - detail 41 #7c Property Acquisition - detail 42 #7d Property Acquisition - detail 43 #8 Proposed Sewer Construction 45 LIST OF MAPS (continued) Page #9 Proposed Street Resurfacing 46 #10 Proposed Street Lighting Improvements 47 #11 Proposed Water Service Construction 49 #12 Future Land Use 52 #13 Proposed Site Development 53 #13a Property Disposition - detail 54 #13b Property Disposition - detail 55 #13c Property Disposition - detail 56 #14 Traffic Circulation Changes 58 I • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 has provided local government with the opportunity to concentrate rehabilitation work in selected blighted areas of the city. The City of Lansing is considering four areas in old sections of the city for major rehabilitation activities. The first of these areas to receive treatment is Neighborhood Development Area #1, located on Lansing's west side. NDA #1 is a residential area with 837 persons residing in 284 living units. Most of this housing was designed for single family living, and the majority is still single family. Only 22 structures now contain two or more living units. And only two commercial uses are located in the NDA, a beauty shop and a small printing shop. Most of the housing was built fifty or more years ago and,much of it now contains structural, mechanical, or electrical deficiencies as defined by the Lansing Uniform Housing Code. These code related deficiencies along with many neglected maintenance items are indications of the deteriorated condition of the neighborhood. In addition, many of the public facilities in the area are old and have become deteriorated or outdated in recent years. Both the public facilities and the private properties need a considerable amount of rehabilitation if the neigh- borhood is to become a viable urban community which provides decent housing and a suitable living environment. The development plan for NDA #1 has been designed to provide these things by detailing the needed improvements and emphasizing the cooperative role of the city and the private sector (both homeowners and business) in implementing changes in the area. The City will implement all improvements to upgrade public facilities. Costs will be assessed according to City policy and will be eligible under the loans and grants program. These improvements include: sidewalk replacement where necessary throughout the area, separation of storm and ' sanitary sewers, curb and gutter replacement and street resurfacing as needed, replacement of obsolete water mains and old water services, install- ation of needed fire hydrants, construction of handicap ramps at all inter- sections, upgrading of street lighting, improving or eliminating alleys, modifying street circulation by closing Lenawee to through traffic and changing Washtenaw and Kalamazoo back to two way streets, eliminating a ' section of Birch Street which is not adequate, constructing a pedestrian pathway and a small open space, replanting street trees where needed, and increasing vector control throughout the area. Individual properties will be improved by offering low interest loans and/or grants to all homeowners for the purpose of rehabilitating the 229 eligible structures in the area. All structures and their sur- roundings will be required to comply with the City of Lansing's code of ordinances. In addition, those participating in the City's loans and grants program must comply with the neighborhood rehabilitation standards for the area to the extent that can be supported by loans and/or grants under the residential rehabilitation loan program. These improvements are related to appearance as well as safety and are also eligible for funding under the program. -1- M In addition, 27 structures (26 residential structures and 1 commercial structure) and 6 vacant parcels will be acquired by the city to correct problems of overcrowded parcels, make necessary public improvements and remove structures too deteriorated to rehabilitate. All persons living in these structures will receive full relocation benefits as established by the city's relocation program. Cost estimates which have been assigned to these proposed activities include: Acquisition $ 422,020 Relocation 216,500 Rehabilitation (through loans and grants) 1,125,000 Public Improvements 1,036,400 Reserve for Contingency 370,650 TOTAL $ 3,170,570 The City of Lansing's Housing and Redevelopment Department will be responsible for the implementation of the recommended programs with other city departments, financial institutions, contractors and homeowners. All implementation is contingent upon the availability and continuation of federal funding as planned. This development plan has been designed after consultation with the Citizen's District Council, in conformance with the city 's Master Plan, and in accordance with State of Michigan Public Act 344 of 1945 as amended (Rehabilitation of Blighted Areas Act). Act 344 was established by City Council ordinance as the authority for formulation and imple- mentation of the development plan and as the guide for citizen participation. - 2 - II - DEFINITION OF TERMS 1. Citizen's District Council. A citizen's organization which consists o persons iving in or having a substantial interest in'a' Neighborhood Development area. Each Council shall serve in an advisory capacity on all phases of the Neighborhood Development Area Plan formulation and implementation as established under authority of 1945:PA 344, State, of Michigan, as amended. 2. Code Compliance. The correction of all violations of the Lansing Uniform Housing Code. 3. Community Development Plan. The plan developed, and a's'it maybe amended from time to time by the ity of Lansing, which identifies Community Development needs, demonstrates a comprehensive strategy for meeting those needs, specifies both short and long-term community development objectives, and which describes community development programs. - 4. Lansing Uniform Housing Code. An ordinance which provides —- minimum requirements for the protection of life, limb, health, property, safety and welfare of the general public and the owners and occupants' of residential buildings. 5. Neighborhood Design Characteristics. Those features of an area which are peculiar to it or are particularly identifiable, such -'as .,architecture, street layouts, landscaping, etc. 6. Neighbhood Development Areas. Those areas which are designated for housing major rehabilitation, preservation, or acquisition and clearance in the Community Development Plan. r 7. Platting. The partitioning or dividing of a parcel of land which is recorded, mapped, and charted with the County Plat Board. Replatting is.a process of changing the boundaries of a recorded lot. 8. Rehabilitation Standards. Guidelines for interior and exterior-:, improvements, of the,,physical condition of,the' individual housing units�-and "the` surroundi ng - area,' beyond the �acti'ons',--requi red, to' comply{ wi th`'thel :' Housing Code. r3:1L01 ') 9. , Zoning: The dividing of 'the' community unto` 'di,stri�cts= ji n- order to U.regulate 'With,-thes'e I di stri°cts the use 'of 1 and-, the use of rstructures; =4 v . qhe height of buildings, and the area! of buildings in order to" protect he,general�welfare of the public. I 3_ III - INTRODUCTION Congressional adoption of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 opened the doors for local governmental management of urban problem solving programs. Federal government dollars were placed into local hands in order to provide cities with the incentive and the financial support to develop ". . . viable urban communities, by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income."I The details of administration, planning, design, and implementation of the program were to be initiated locally. On May 12, 1975, the City of Lansing adopted a residential rehabilitation strategy for its Community Development effort. The City also adopted Public Act 344 of 1945 as amended (Rehabilitation of Blighted Areas Act) as the legal authority for formulation and implementation of a development plan. In conformance with the City Charter, the City Council was to act as policy maker and the mayor as the chief executive and administrative officer of the program. In addition, the Office of Community Development with an Executive Assistant to the Mayor was created to manage the resources of Community Development for Lansing. Other city departments and agencies were designated to formulate the plans and implement the programs.2 In accordance with Act 344 and federal legislation, a citizen participation component was built into the plan to insure public input. Citizen's District Council areas surrounding the designated Neighborhood Development areas were established to give larger areas representation in citizen participation activities. The Citizen's District Councils, which consist of both elected and appointed persons who live in the District Council Areas or the Develop- ment Areas, are advisory boards which review development proposals. Consul- tation with these Councils is required before any final development plans can be adopted by the city. Lansing's rehabilitation effort will be focused in specified areas of the city. These areas will be chosen on the basis of defined objectives which will be detailed later in this report. As designated Neighborhood Development Areas (NDAs), they will receive the major'portion of the Community Development grant. Before programs can be implemented in an area, however, a complete development plan for the NDA must be approved by the Lansing City Council. This document, the development plan for NDA #1, will detail the objec- tives of the Community Development Program in Lansing, the existing features of Neighborhood Development Area #1 (Westside), and the plan which has been formulated to improve or solve the physical problems of NDA #1. Since this document is primarily a summary document of findings, many details have been omitted. These details are on file in the City Planning Department and are 1Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. 2City of Lansing, Council Proceedings, Ordinance #389, May 12, 1975. 3State of Michigan Public Act 344 of 1945 as amended (Rehabilitation of Blighted Areas Act). 'SW available for public perusal upon request. In addition, a separate document will be prepared to explain the social programs developed for residents of NDA #1 by the Human Resources Department. It is important to note that the Community Development Program is a partnership arrangement between the city government, the federal government, and the people living in the NDA. The federal government will provide the programs (after consultation with the citizens in the area) and the citizens who qualify will receive loans and/or grants for rehabilitation purposes. In addition, the city will support the selected neighborhoods by upgrading public facilities in the area. All implementation is, of course,contingent upon the availability and continuation of federal funding as planned. - 5 - IV• COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 has been designed to address the problems associated with the growth of urban blight and the deterioration of the urban environment. The major focus of the pro- gram is on physical development activity (primarily housing) with a supporting ' social component tied to this activity. The legislation provides a new framework for allocating federal housing assistance funds and linking housing assistance to a local community's comprehensive planning and ' community development programs. The program consolidates existing urban renewal, model cities, neighborhood facilities, open space, water and sewer, and public facility loans programs to enable a coordinated local ' effort to improve the urban environment and extend housing opportunities for persons of low and moderate income. Both federal and City of Lansing objec- tives and requirements for the Community Development program are detailed below: A. FEDERAL DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND REQUIREMENTS' Objectives set forth in the national legislation are: - Elimination of slums, blight and blighting influences. - Elimination of conditions which are detrimental to the health, ' safety, and welfare of the community. - The conservation and expansion of the housing stock. - The expansion and improvement of community services and facilities. , - A more rational utilization of land and other natural resources. - A reduction of the isolation of income groups within the community ' by increasing the diversity and vitality of neighborhoods. - The restoration and preservation of properties of value for , historic, architectural, or aesthetic reasons. Requirements are: ' - Emphasis is on residential rehabilitation. - Programs must be aimed at maintenance, revitalization and stabiliza- tion of blighted, deteriorated and deteriorating neighborhoods. - Emphasis is on meeting needs of low and moderate income families ' and individuals. - Consistent short and long-range objectives must be developed within ' a five-year plan. 'All details were paraphrased from the Housing and Community Development , Act of 1974. -6- ' - Project plans must comply with National Environmental Protection Act regulations. - The citizen participation plan must be part of the Community Develop- ment Plan developed by local units of government and must be made public. - The citizen participation plan must include the establishment of an organization or process by which citizens can: 1. articulate their needs 2. express themselves regarding proposed projects ' 3. assist in selection of priorities 4. participate in the development of the Community Development application according to a timetable developed by that unit of government - Allocations must follow normal City budgeting procedures. ' - Applicants must prepare an annual housing assistance plan. - Social Service programs must be integrated with physical develop- ment activities. - The City may shorten or lengthen its program year to expedite the activities it has undertaken. - The Community Development plan may be amended to contain new activities during a program year. ' B. CITY OF LANSING: DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND REQUIREMENTS 1 City of Lansing - Objectives are: Long term City wide objectives to address identified Community Develo�- ment needs as adopted by City Council resolution on December 9, 1974, are: Category I (Top Priority): Improve Structural Condition of Homes and Other Buildings Category II (Eligible for Funding): Increase Housing Opportunities, ' Community Service and Facilities, Health, Life and Property. Category III (Supportive Funding to Implement Categories I and II only): Reduce Isolation of Income Groups; Historic Preservation. 1City of Lansing, Council Proceedings, December 9, 1974, p. 1060. - 7 - C. Requirements: Several areas within the City are being considered for major rehab- ilitation efforts. Those currently being considered are outlined on Map #1. The majority of the funds will be channeled into the selected Neighborhood Development Areas (NDAs) with a much more limited program available in certain areas outside the NDAs. Rehabilitation programs were to be developed to upgrade the housing quality and the environment of the areas. Programs were to alleviate health and safety problems through rigorous enforcement of City of Lansing Housing Codes. In addition, Neighborhood Rehabilitation Standards, developed by the City with the cooperation of the CDC, were to further upgrade the structures and their environment. In order to achieve the above objectives, City Council adopted a resolution on December 23, 1974,1 which established that the ". policy for Community Development shall be a containment strategy that attempts to arrest deterioration and blighting influence in residential areas that are worthy of preservation." Some of the major activities eligible for funding under the City's containment strategy are: - Acquisition of real property; - Improvement of public facilities and services; Code enforcement; - Clearance and rehabilitation; - Removal of barriers to elderly and handicapped; - Relocation benefits; - Provision of public services (health, education and welfare). CITY NEEDS, AREA DESIGNATIONS, AND PROPOSED RESULTS Needs: An assessment of the physical condition of Lansing's housing stock of 50,000 units in 1974 revealed the following:2 - 30,500 units (61%) were in standard condition - 15,000 units (30%) were in deteriorating condition 1City of Lansing, Council Proceedings, December 23, 1974, p. 1093. 2The Housing Plan for Neighborhood Revitalization, Lansing Planning Department, February, 1975, p. 1 - 4,500 units (9%) were in substandard condition With over one third of the City's housing stock in either deteriorating or substandard conditions, the need for programs to upgrade the housing stock was substantiated. Surveys also showed many deficiencies in public service facilities such as streets, curbs and gutters, and sewers. Programs to correct these problems were also needed. Since the needs of the entire city were obviously too large to be met by C.D. funds, it was necessary to designate the specific areas where programs would be concentrated. Area Designations: Specific residential areas were selected for major rehabilitation treat- ment based on the following criteria: - Location in target area census tracts as established by the Technical Planning Committee and City Council. - Prior commitment to a neighborhood with regard to major capital improvement projects. - General deteriorating condition of the neighborhood and its proximity to residential areas of sound housing quality (containment strategy for urban blight). - Demonstrated interest by residents of the selected areas. Proposed results: It is hoped that major rehabilitation efforts in the areas will encourage stable residential neighborhoods which: - Meet the housing needs of the residents. - Provide the necessary supportive facilities. - Preserve property values and encourage investment potential. - Produce an environment conducive to human enrichment. One of the keys to understanding this is to understand the different implications of the term "stable residential neighborhoods." On the one hand it means safety and security, equal access and opportunity to basic public and private services, and an environment that complements the life style of the residents. It also means that potential economic risk has not only been reduced, but actually reversed so as to encourage the opportunity for reasonable profits within the area. And, of course, it means tax dollar resources available from neighborhoods to pay the operating costs of the municipality. NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREAS - 10 - MAP 1 V• NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA 1 AREA PROFILE A. GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION ' Neighborhood Development Area #1 is located on Lansing's west side, approximately one mile west of the State Capitol and the Central Business District. The area consists of all or part of fourteen city blocks and has ' a total area of about 51 acres. Geographically the area's location is desirable. Not only is it close to the large state government complex and the Central Business District, it is also located between two of Lansing's largest employers, Oldsmobile and Fisher Body. On the south, the quiet residential character of the NDA is separated from Oldsmobile by Interstate Highway 496. To the north and west, the NDA is separated from Fisher Body by several residential blocks. The close proximity of the area to such a large portion of Lansing's business, industry, and governmental offices offers distinct advantages to the residents in terms of convenience, transportation, and general accessibility. The area to the west of the NDA is a well maintained residential neighborhood. Bordering on the northeast section of the NDA is the new Kingsley Place Park and Recreation facility and the new Vivian Riddle Elementary School (both currently under construction). The obvious eastern boundary, Logan Street (and Birch to the south), is currently being redesigned and reconstructed to serve as a more efficient and adequate traffic artery. B. LEGAL AREA DESCRIPTIONS ' The legal description entitled "Citizens' District Area No. 1" describes the boundaries from which area citizen participation for Community ' Development programs shall come. The legal description entitled "Neighborhood DevelopmentArea No. 1" describes the boundaries within which the Community Development physical and social projects will focus. Following the legal descriptions is a boundary map (Map #2) showing ' Citizens' District Area No. 1 and Neighborhood Development Area No. 1. Citizens' District Area No. 1: Commencing at the intersection of the center lines of St. Joseph Street and West Street, in the City of Lansing, thence northerly on the center line of West Street to Lenawee Street, thence westerly on the center line of Lenawee Street to Everett Drive, thence northeasterly on the center line of Everett Drive to the center line of Kalamazoo Street, thence northwesterly on the center line of Kalamazoo Street to McPherson Avenue, thence northerly on the center line of McPherson Avenue to its intersection with the center line of Michigan Avenue, thence ' north along the center line of Spencer Street to its intersection with the north line extended on Lot #137 of Inverness Subdivision, thence east on said north line to the west line of Lot #136 of said subdivision, thence north 35 feet, thence easterly 353.6 feet along the rear lot lines of Lots 140 through 148, inclusive, of said subdivision, thence north to the southwest corner of Lot 127 of said subdivision, thence easterly along the south line of said Lot 127 to the west line of Jenison Street, thence ' northeasterly to the southwest corner of Lot 121 of said subdivision, thence - 11 - east 120 feet to the east line of said Inverness Subdivision, thence north to the northwest corner of Lot 8 of Block 4, J.M. French's Subdivision, thence east along the north lines of Lots 8, 7 and 4 of said Block 4 to Lahoma Street, thence south on the center line of Lahoma Street to the north line of Michigan Avenue, thence southeasterly to the northeast corner of Lot 19 of Assessor's Plat No. 8, thence south on the east line of Lot 19, 139.42 feet, thence west to the northwest corner of Lot 25 and said Plat, thence south on the west line of said Lot 25 to the north line of Allegan Street, thence southerly to the northeast corner of Lot 18, Block 2 of Kempf's Addition, thence south to the southeast corner of said Lot 18, thence southeasterly to the northeast corner of Lot 19, Block 1 of Kempf's Addition, thence south to the southeast corner of said Lot 19, thence west to the northwest corner of Lot 15 of Taylor's Addition, thence south 148.5 feet on the west line of said Lot 15, thence south to the southeast corner of said Lot 29 of Assessor's Plat No. 9, thence south to the southeast corner of said Lot 29, thence east on the north line of Foster Court Addition to the northeast corner of Lot #1, thereof, thence south on the east line of said Lot #1 to Kingsley Court, thence east on the center line of Kingsley Court to Logan Street, thence south on the center line of Logan Street to Hillsdale Street, thence west on the center line of Hillsdale Street to its intersection with the east line extended of Lot 70 of Assessor's Plat No. 42, thence south on said east line to the southeast corner of said Lot 70, thence east to the northeast corner of Lot 85 of Assessor's Plat No. 42, thence south on the east line of said Lot 85 to St. Joseph Street, thence south to the center line of St. Joseph Street, thence west on the center line of St. Joseph Street to the place of beginning. Neighborhood Development Area No. 1: Commencing at a point on the south line of mi-cTilgan Avenue 90 Teetwes o the west line of Jenison Avenue (being the northwest Corner of Lot 212 of McPherson's Heatherwood Subdivision No. 3), thence east on the south line of Michigan Avenue to the west line of Huron Street, thence south on the west line of Huron Street to the north line of Kalamazoo Street, thence east on said north line to the southeast corner of Lot 43 of Assessor's Plat No. 9, thence north to the northeast corner of said Lot 43, thence east to the northeast corner corner of Lot 51 of said Plat, thence south along the east line of said Lot 51, extended, to the south line of Kalamazoo Street, thence east on the south line of Kalamazoo Street to the west line of Logan Street, thence south on the west line of Logan Street to the south line of Lenawee Street, thence west 132 feet on the south line of Lenawee Street, thence south 71 feet, thence west 16.5 feet, thence south 160 feet to the north line of Assessor's Plat No. 42, thence west on said plat line to the northwest corner of Lot 10 of Assessor's Plat No. 42, thence south along the west line of said Lot 10, extended, to the south line of Hillsdale Street, thence west to the northwest corner of Lot 63 of said Plat, thence south to the southwest corner of said Lot 63, thence east to the northeast corner of Lot 61 of said Plat, thence south to the southeast corner of Lot 93 of said Plat, thence west to the northeast corner of Lot 92 of said Assessor's Plat No. 42, thence south on the east line of said Lot 92 to the north line of St. Joseph Street, thence west on the north line of St. Joseph Street to a point 85 feet west of the west line of Jenison Avenue, thence north along the west lines of Lots 42, 41, 40 and 39 of McPherson's Heatherwood Subdivision No. 2 to the south line of Hillsdale Street, thence northerly to the southwest corner of Lot 81 of said subdivision - 12 - thence northerly on the west lines of Lots 81 and 80 to the northwest corner of Lot 80 of said subdivision, thence northwesterly to the west corner of Lot 79 of said subdivision, thence northeasterly to the southwest corner of Lot 76 of said subdivision, thence northwesterly to the northwest corner of said Lot 76, thence northerly to the southwest corner of Lot 150 of said subdivision, thence northerly to the northwest corner of said Lot 150, thence west to the southwest corner of Lot 151 of said McPherson's Heatherwood Subdivision No. 2, thence north to the southwest corner of Lot 161 of McPherson's Heatherwood Subdivision No. 3, thence north to the northwest corner of Lot 165 of said subdivision, thence east to the southwest corner of Lot 167, thence north to the northwest corner of Lot 167, thence northerly to the southwest corner of Lot 169 of said subdivision, thence north to the northwest corner of said Lot 169, thence west to the southwest corner of Lot 170 of said subdivision, thence north to the northwest corner of Lot 174 of said subidivion, thence east to the southwest corner of Lot 176 of said subdivision, thence north to the northwest corner of Lot 176, thence northerly to the southwest corner of Lot 204 of said McPherson's Heatherwood Subdivision No. 3, thence north to the northwest corner of said Lot 204, thence west to the west subdivision line of McPherson's Heatherwood Subdivision No. 3, thence north on said west subdivision line to the south line of Allegan Street, thence northeasterly to the southwest corner of Lot 210 of said subdivision, thence north 125.1 feet, thence northeasterly to the southwest corner of Lot 212 of said McPherson's Heatherwood Subdivision No. 3-thence northerly on the west line of said Lot 212 to the point of beginning, City of Lansing. C. PEOPLE IN NDA #1 ' The NDA is almost exclusively a residential area. With the exception of two small businesses and a day care center, the area is oriented toward the people living there. The total population of the area is 837 persons.1 For the most part, these persons are black, 88.5%. (City wide average is 11% black.)2 The youth population of the area (18 years and under) forms the largest ' segment of the population, 45%,3 (Lansing's average is 36%).4 The proportion of elderly, over 65 years, however, corresponds almost exactly with the city average of 8.5%.5 Family income levels are considerably lower than city ' wide average. City income for families is $12,444 while NDA #1 mean income for families is only $10,858:6 1Housing Inspection, NDA #1, Fall, 1975. 2Resident Survey, NDA #1, Fall, 1975, and U.S. Census of Population, Lansing, Michigan, 1970. 4Resident Survey. 5Lansing Planning Department estimate for 1975 based on updated census information. 6Resident Survey and U.S. Census, 1970. Resident Survey and U.S. Census, 1970. - 13 - M., �o�oQa EIDaa� ap �, 1 aar O t7 ;a„ ❑ ❑ Q a ° Y U ita��ra� µ.a l D o [oub Cap ,EGax 06 0 y� f2 EL -To ❑❑ 'J'J El 06, Donnorl ME ° /'. • ' f f STe El. ]Be . Q C� ;-�^�hJpofJ ❑0;i Q O]a�a/LL ol =N� D] FC°�❑�❑o [QQ P ]�y /�� W I-1 f `ir1�1 4Q� �� �ao a,a.�a.���Q00(Qa0OaGr . DETI ci a 1 0 %-n Ds a �l "Moodoj� ment Area 1 ❑ ` ❑'❑ 0 DIJ L J O r BT2BI ❑ a.a E _ wcs 7 „r '•O �barO ^ �—ULfL +��r—+r--� L Do o LJ.'^aaa (r I —I _ ❑O ❑,��1. i 0 ❑ �a�]0 LL' :D :J J Du '�� a ,.,,J s.a _ • _ of �� e.f �f-1 ❑ � s.• Tor °° W J�p ` r J' ' fnfs -.O . � .r�•�.:o �' , ��.. o:b o , 0 4 � �' � d a WE E23, i, s ' \ , O1 {Q:, •��»° `L/ • j 4 �i,.s� ❑ �..' [� Q ! n a ❑ • ❑ /��' ° o[ ❑ ¢� r, `F� ..�n ❑ [] 0 , o EF�°�Y��jj' �ol��d �d 00O000Q JIIr�'��'� `a '� ��❑[I'I�I J�� ` ,f D.O O-LJ - E:, UJ4e,�iL,1__il�>CU _. E� - EST LJL�L� t-� �� .,..-1(•1n4Jl ..J Iw_] NILLS1a STREET �; n �J'�h IY, I• ��jl I�'y� In��� _ SENVICE �}a e nnIJ0 ❑ .,`a, r� 1 L•. U._QOOl G02,1,0 J�if,' �11 �,'--,'--'I IJJ '� •Ll ;, �miIGEF. D0 Lie C T ffaLLLLLL f ICJ M LJ ST.TpN r Si1TH N}I 00- Oct ❑ ':. -•� '�-I bbo�0❑a oo4a,. ":% - aserDPI �� �'r—��r—,[--•�[--.,--.--,r--.. �^�� r+r--+r�r�r�r�r—+r----� r V I '1 Ep ST r°: MAP 2 - 14 - High unemployment rates (20% as compared to city wide average of 11.9p 1 and low education levels (NDA average = 10 years, city average = 12 years) ' help account for the low income. In additiog, the high percentage of female heads of household (NDA = 24%, Lansing = 9%) also contributes to the low income levels since female wage earners typically are lower salaried than male wage earners (Median earnings of Lansing female civilian labor force ' in 1969 = $5,236. Median earnings of Lansing male civilian labor force in 1969 = $9,629).4 Conclusions that can be drawn from these statistics are that the large ' proportion of non wage earning persons (youth and elderly), the high dependency of families on female wage earners, and the overall low education levels of ' those living in the NDA, help produce the overall low income levels in the area. These low income levels are deterrents in the rehabilitation or adequate maintenance of the housing stock by those living in the NDA. D. LAND USE Existing Land Use: Residential development represents the primary ' land use in the Neighborhood Development Area #1. Only two of the 260 structures are not used for residential purposes. One of those two structures is a day care center and one is a commercial printing shop. Of the remaining ' 258 structures, the 236 detached single-family residential dwellings are the predominant type of residential structure and give the area its single family character. The 22 scattered multi -family dwellings (2, 3 and 4 family dwellings) comprise the remaining residential land use in the area. ' Table 1 (below) details the breakdown of units, structures and land area within the NDA. ' 1Lansing Planning Department estimate, 1975. 2U.S. Census, 1970. ' 3Resident Survey and U.S. Census, 1970. 4Detailed Characteristics, Michigan, 1970 Census, Tables 175 and 1976. - 15 - Table 1 NDA #1 Land Use Summary % of No. of No. of Land Use Acreage Total Structures Units Residential - Total Single Family Two Family Three Family Four Family Community Services Day Care Commercial Commercial Printing Shop (Garage) Vacant Land Public Right of Way (streets, sidewalks, etc.) Total 33.24 64.6% 258 284 29.43 88.5% 236 236 3.16 9.5% 19 38 .41 1.2% 2 6 .23 .7% 1 4 .30 .6% 1 1 .03 .1% 4.71 9.2% 13.1 25.4% 51.46 100.0% 260 286 Map #3 details existing land uses. Since land use in the area developed prior to the development of a city master plan and since land use in the area has not changed since that time, current land use in the NDA is in basic conformance with the guidelines of the 1960 Comprehensive Master Plan for Lansing, Michigan. Current Zoning: Current zoning in NDA #1 is A-1, single family residential (single-family detached, minimum lot size = 5,000 square feet), B-1 single family residential (single-family detached, minimum lot size = 4,000 square feet) and C-2, family residential (two family district, minimum lot size = 6,400 feet). - 16 - oo CHELSEA V%%SHT0VW LL KNGSLEY w K v 9 GI bm W 1: 501 611 11561551 i51 5ki � I -01 171 160, 201 46j.'f7l 4411 451 211 221 51 241 251 261 271 ON ON101 :4. fall91 f % KALAMAZOO z LENAWEE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN FEBRUARY 1, 1976 SECTION 33-01-17 Lr-k3r-NU ADDRESS BLOC K NO. 3MO3 PARCEL NO NDA BOUNDARY I , #1 EXISTING LAND USE 1:1 Single Family L1 Two Family Three/ Four Family Commercial El Day Care Center Q vacant T,'l, P 3 1 ST. JOSEPH 17 - ' Table 2 NDA #1 Summary of Zoning Status ' by Acres and Percentage ' Zoning Acreage Percentage ' A-1 5.27 13.26 B-1 33.32 83.85 C-2 1.27 3.21 Ninety-two (92) percent of the structures in the NDA conform to the zoning district in which they are located. The only exceptions are 20 ' structures which have more than one living unit in them. Of these, fourteen are legal non -conforming uses and six are illegal uses. In addition, there is one structure used as a printing shop (classified as a legal non- conforming use), a day care center which was established by a special use permit, and a small beauty shop operated in a residential structure (non- conforming use). Zoning districts are designated on Map #4. Development Patterns: 1. Platting. The Neighborhood Development area was part of the original city plat and is characterized by over platting practices. These practices produced crowded housing development and erratic sized and shaped lots. Fifty-five lots are too small by current standards and others have excessive lot depth, inadequate side yards, and in some instances, shared driveways. Inspection of the area indicates that the land has not been used efficiently. Some houses have almost no yard while others have back yards too deep for practical use or easy maintenance. There are three ' residential structures within the area with no direct access to the public streets. These residences are served by private alleys or easement rights. It is difficult to provide this type of development with the proper fire and police protection and ambulance service. 2. Density. Residential density within the neighborhood, if computed on ' a net basisl is 8.54 dwelling units per acre. This figure is somewhat higher than usually found with single family areas in Lansing. The reason for this discrepancy is the large amount of "B-1 Family" zoning district (33.32 acres) found in the neighborhood. This particular district permits smaller lot size development (4,000 square feet) and, therefore, higher densities for single family structures. This high density•is not a problem in all portions of the neighborhood. Housing on Huron, Rulison, Hillsdale and Lenawee Street is ' notably overcrowded. The higher density factor places heavy pressure on vehicular parking and recreational opportunities within the neighborhood. 1Net density is defined as residential dwelling units per acre minus public right-of-way. - 18 - z w 3 l0o oil ozi 327 071 031woo MICR r-AN ALLEGAN CHELSEA L WASHTEP-4AW ov ON 2 331 321 ft ; * OFT, -,9,0 'oil KALAMAZOO LENAWEE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN FEBRUARY 1, 1976 SECTION 33-01-17 Lr—Ur—NLJ ADDRESS Ijl j KOCK NO. A3 lol PARCEL NO NDA BOUNDARY ZONING 13 A-1 El B-1 E3 C-2 El Legal Nonconforming [M Illegal Uses Q Special Use Permit r TAP 4 - 19 - 3. Community Facilities. There are no parks or other community facilities within the NDA although a new park and recreation facility (Kingsley Place) is being constructed immediately adjacent to the area. (A very small portion of Kingsley Place is within the NDA.) These fa- cilities are designed to serve the neighborhood. 4. Circulation. The NDA was built on a standard gridiron pattern with streets running east/west and north/south. The streets which form the eastern and southern boundaries of the area, Logan and St. Joseph, are both minor ' arterials. Arterials carry traffic to other parts of the community. Allegan Street, which bisects the neighborhood for only one block, is also a minor arterial. Otherwise, the area streets are designated as residential col- lectors which carry traffic into and out of the neighborhood (Jenison Street ' and Kalamazoo Street) or residential streets (Michigan, Lenawee, Hillsdale, Rulison, Birch and Huron streets) which carry traffic within the neighborhood. ' Kalamazoo, Allegan, Washtenaw and St. Joseph are now one way streets (which encourage non -local traffic in the area); the remainder are two way. Parking is being widened to allow better circulation around Vivian Riddle ' School and Kingsley Place. At the present time, Logan Street and Birch Street are being redesigned as a one way pair system to help relieve congestion along Logan Street. The new southbound Birch Street will create a hazardous intersection with Lenawee Street because of poor visibility, and it will 1 also create a hazardous intersection with the existing portion of Birch north of Hillsdale. Otherwise traffic congestion is not a problem in the NDA or its immediate surroundings. The only traffic problem within the area results from the traffic pas- sing through the area on the way to or from Oldsmobile, Fisher Body, the Central Business District, the State Capitol and areas west of the city. Although the volumes of traffic traveling through the area are not higher than the streets are designed to carry, it is not desirable to use a resi- dential area such as this for commuter traffic. Pedestrian traffic utilizes the city sidewalk system which parallels the street system. The only major exception is that an informal pathway has developed between Lenawee and Kalamazoo Street in the 1200 block. This pathway has developed because of the excessively long block between Logan and Huron Street (1,100 feet). In the future this pathway will become even more widely utilized for access to Kingsley Place and Vivian Riddle School. However, the pathway is not public right-of-way. It traverses the side and back yards of several private properties. Existing circulation patterns are designated on Map #5. 5. Land Use Changes. The area encompassed within the NDA was originally platted and developed as a residential area and it is still a residential area. There have been no significant changes in the land use. The only changes have resulted in the conversions of scattered single family dwellings, the addition of a day care center, the printing shop and the beauty shop. - 20 - I F- 3 101 00 MICHIGAN g _e Ir 121 III 101 Q01 151 WI 131 091 s Oil 021 091 y 327 On I; 031 04, Obl a 05' [t 00 YOG ALLEGM �i W, � T001 /�'I l,l 1 - ■ I, Ic 031 330 I41 II s 0Y1 131 r 1 II Q61 O71 OPI OI - 1 n 1 �p0 WASH 1 ENAwl.' 001 Ill 1bl 1 — 1 Oil 141 7 021 333 is, II as1 Iz1 u1 Z " d' 071 T 011 O31 OYI ONOY 071 Yoc ' ;sao 11KALAMAZOO woc Ism , 0 1 '00 i �I 1 391 Oil Llissil" 401 0 I 621 GI 60I S191 % 571 551 521 511 451 J461:4111461 451 441 431 411 411 9 03l 091 10, 111 121 151 141 151 I61 171 101 191 251 264 271 201 211 221 Z51241 r 041 a+ QII 051 R___ mmmmma® 511 1301 zil 331 321 041 0910q 101 111 1u 1� 141T 151 05, ly OTI -- 231 ZZI 201 2a 1 1 Z V J _ 1 1 LENAWEE ]GO 1100 1 —1 Oq 631 54z s;I 522 / Oil 581 571 wl ssl 453 ISI (61 Z � 031 Is 0Z1 611 -- 1 - O, _ 611L01 J II 0w 091 10) '1 a -- zs osl 1 29 Obl 131 071 0B1 IN 121 „ -- R £oo — - i 1 HILLSDALE BI 2T1 261 251 211 = 1 101 111 121 lii 141 V >= mlrl�a NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN FEBRUARY 1, 1976 SECTION 33-01-17 Lr-vuvv a ADDRESS 151 1w _ ALOCK NO. Izl • 01 PARCEL NO. NDA BOUNDARY 1 EXISTING STREET CLASSIFICATION dw�� Minor Arterial = m � Collector Local Residential EXISTING CIRCULATION PATTERNS lomp One Way Act 51 !AP s mv, m 004 MIAWmvMMAW�m ST. JOSEPH W-�� - 21 - 6. Land Uses in the Areas Surrounding the NDA. The NDA is surrounded on the east, north and west by residential areas. On the south it is separated from Oldsmobile by Interstate 496. There are no major commercial centers in the area immediately surrounding, but a small grocery store borders the NDA on the northeast. However, the grocery store will be removed for the construction of Kingsley Place. The nearest major shopping facilities are in the central business district approximately one mile east of the NDA. However, no major food shopping facilities are available in the immediate surroundings. The nearest major grocery markets are several miles away. The State Capitol buildings, located adjacent to the Central Business District, are gradually being expanded westward, bringing them closer to the NDA. Various community service facilities surround the Neighborhood Develop- ment Area. Two elementary schools, Main and Michigan Avenue, are just out- side the NDA on the south and east. The new elementary school, Vivian Riddle, is currently under construction just north of the area, and Sexton High School lies approximately two blocks west of the NDA. St. Joseph Park, a community park, is approximately four blocks west of the NDA. The new Kingsley Place Park will border the NDA on the north and the West Side Drop In Center furnishes some additional recreational facilities one block east of Logan Street. The nearest hospital, St. Lawrence, is located six blocks north of the NDA. In recent years land uses surrounding the NDA have undergone considerable change. The expansion of Oldsmobile and the construction of I-496 removed an entire area of housing units as did the expansion of the state govern- ment complex and the Capitol Commons Redevelopment Area (some housing will be replaced in the redevelopment area). The construction of Kingsley Place and Vivian Riddle School also removed housing stock from the surrounding area, and the reconstruction of Logan Street and Birch Street is removing still more housing. The total loss in housing stock is in excess of 1,600 housing units since 1960. Yet each of these projects has brought new and better facilities for work, recreation, open space, or transportation to the area's residents and to the city. In addition, the importance of the area as a residential community has been strengthened by emphasizing its central location and its function of providing good housing stock within the city. Map #6 details some of the important features which surround NDA #1. Problems: Land use problems in the NDA can be summarized as follows: - Many lots are crowded because of small and narrow lotting patterns. - Excessively deep lots are frequently not well -maintained. - Two non-residential uses in the area are not in conformance with the remainder of the area. - Twenty structures have more than one living unit in them. - 22 - - Three residential structures have no direct access to public streets. - There is no existing public recreation space in the NDA. - The new intersection of Lenawee and Birch will create a visibility problem. - The informal pathway between Lenawee and Kalamazoo is not on the public right-of-way. - The extension of Birch Street will necessitate redevelopment or elimination of the existing portion of Birch Street north of Hillsdale. E. HOUSING There are 258 residential structures located within Neighborhood Development Area #1 (NDA #1). These 258 structures comprise 284 residential dwelling units, ten rooming units, and eight non-residential land uses. Most of the structures in the area are approximately fifty years old and most have the architectural characteristics of "older homes." Features ' such as large front porches, bay windows, and unique roof configurations are characteristics of this architecture. Although many of the homes are essentially the same style, they differ enough in appearance that each house is unique, a feature which distinguishes older neighborhoods such as this from many new subdivisions. ' Unfortunately many of the structures have not been adequately maintained and as a result, the overall neighborhood appearance shows signs of deteriora- tion. In 1969, the City's Community Renewal Program l recognized the housing problems in this area and identified it as an area needing extensive rehab- ' ilitation activity. But only recently have the specific housing problems been identified. Ph sical Condition of Residential Dwelling Units: Detailed housing inspections were conducted in NDA #1 to gather basic information about the physical condition of the structures, parcels, environment, and the general characteristics of occupants. The Lansing Uniform Housing Code was the basis of the inspections which evaluated the primary, secondary and minor structural elements, the mechanical elements, and the electrical elements ' of the dwellings. As a result of the inspections (281 of the units were inspected), a level of physicacondition was assigned to each inspected structure. These levels were: 1Community Description & Neighborhood Analysis - Community Renewal Program, Lansing, Michigan, 1969. 2Specific definitions of the various components of the inspection procedure can be found in "Lansing's Code Compliance Survey" - Housing Inspection ' Information Booklet, Lansing Planning Department, 1975. -24- 1. Standard condition 2. Deteriorating condition 3. Substandard condition 4. Critical condition. It should be noted that these designations are only useful as a general indicator of housing condition, and do not reflect sufficient information to make meaningful recommendations on individual dwelling unit improvements. Table #3 provides a general physical comparison between all dwelling units, by structural type, in NDA #1. The percentages in the deteriorating, substandard, and critical columns show that 32.1% of all units in the neighborhood are experiencing some degree of physical decline. The largest percentage is in the deteriorating category where 19.9 percent of the units are located. This high percentage seems to reinforce the belief that this area is not totally blighted (i.e. high percentages in the substandard and critical columns). - 25 - Type of Dwelling Unit 1 Family Detached 1 2 Family DO 3 Family 4 Family TOTAL Table 3 NDA #1 Physical Condition of Residential Dwelling Units Standard Condition No. % 165 58.7 20 7.1 6 2.1 191 67.9 Deteriorating Condition No. % 56 19.9 16 5.7 4 1.55 76 27.15 , Substandard Condition No. % 11 2 3.9 0.7 13 4.6 Critical Condition No. % 1 .35 1 .35 Total No. % 233. 82.85 38 13.5 6 2.1 4 1.55 281 100 The housing inspection teams from the Building Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, and Planning Department identified 366 code violations in Neighborhood Development Area-#1. The majority of these violations were electrical (38%), with structural violations being the second highest (36%), and mechanical violations having the lowest percentage (26%). In addition, the inspection teams found that 144 dwelling units (41%) contained no insulation -material. One hundred and nine dwelling units (39%) were partially insulated, while only 59 units t(20%) were completely insulated. Occupancy: One hundred and seventy-six dwelling units, or 63% of the total housing units, are owner occupied. This figure is exactly the same as the Lansing city wide percentage for 1970, which indicated that 63% of all units were owner occupied.2 In 1976, based on estimates from the Lansing Housing Assistance Plan, only'61% of all city wide housing units were owner occupied. Neighborhood Development Area #1, therefore, seems to exhibit a strong tendency toward home ownership. This factor is considered, hypothetically, to act as a stabilizing force in main- taining the physical condition of the neighborhood over time. NDA #1 also contains 74, or 26%, renter occupied dwelling units. This percentage is considerably lower than the 31% renter occupancy city wide as documented in the 1970 census for Lansing. In addition, according to the Lansing Housing Assistance Plan for 1976, it was estimated that 32.6% of all city wide households were renter occupied. It is interesting to note the percentage distribution portrayed in Table 4, which describes the relationship between physical condition and occupancy. According to the distribution in Table 4, physical condition declines as the percentage of renter occupied households increases. For example, 68% of all "standard"3'dwelling units are owner occupied as com- pared with a renter occupancy of 23.4%. Moving into the "deteriorating" category, the renter occupancy rate increases to 36% while owner occupancy decreases to 54%. Finally, the "substandard" category portrays a situation where the renter and owner occupancy rates are equal at 21%. It has long been hypothesized that.there is a direct correlation between renter occupied units and physically declining neighborhoods. Although the above statistics do not universally substantiate that general hypothesis, there is evidence to suggest that, at least within Neighborhood Development Area #1, rental units exhibit a strong tendency toward inferior physical conditions. Vacancy: The residential inspection program undertaken in NDA #1 during October and November of 1975 found that 8 dwelling units or 2.8 percent of all units were vacant for sale. This percentage is only slighty higher than the city wide vacant for sale rate of 1.7-percent during 1975. 1Structural elements - wall, roof, floor, foundation, etc. Mechanical elements - plumbing, heating, etc. Electrical elements - wiring, electrical service, etc. 21970 Bureau of the Census, City of Lansing, Michigan. 3"Standard," "Deteriorating," "Substandard" and "Critical" are defined in the document "Lansing's Code Compliance Survey" - Housing Inspection Information Booklet, page 7, Lansing Planning Department. 4Table I - Lansing Housing Assistance Plan, 1975. - 27 - m m m m m m m m m m m W m m m m m Tenure in housing units Owner Occupied Renter Occupied Vacant for Sale N, Vacant for Rent co ' Vacant - Other TOTAL Table 4 NDA #1 Physical Condition and Occupancy Standard % of No. Stand. 128 68 42 23.4 5 2.7 6 3.2 5 2.7 186 100% Deteriorating % of No. Deteri or. 43 54 29 36 2 3 5 6 1 1 80 100% Substandard % of No. Substan. 3 21 3 21 1 8 7 50 14 100% Criti cal No. % of Critical 1 100 1 100% When looking at the renter vacancy rate, however, 10 units or 3.6 percent are vacant for rent. This 3.6 percent figure is substantially lower than the city wide rental vacancy rate of 6.3 percent. These low vacancy rates clearly demonstrate the capability of dwelling units in NDA #1 to compete favorably with other dwelling units in the Lansing housing market. And'since every neighborhood needs to have vacant rental and sales housing stock to provide a normal variety of choice in the local housing market, these vacant units are not an area of concern. However, 14 dwelling units (13 structures) are vacant, but are not being offered for sale or for rent. These units are being kept out of the housing market because they are being upgraded for future occupancy or they are physically substandard and unfit for human habitation or the owner does not wish the unit occupied. Vacancy for either of the latter two reasons is of serious concern and must be regarded as a serious waste of natural and manmade resources. These units were not considered in the vacancy rate. Problems: Housing problems can be summarized as follows: - Deteriorating appearance of the housing stock. - Electrical and mechanical violations of the housing code. - Lack of insulation material. - Poor maintenance of renter occupied structures. - Housing that is vacant but unavailable for occupancy. F. PUBLIC FACILITIES Streets: All streets in the NDA are paved two lane facilities. Only the two pub is alleys are unimproved. According to the assessments of the Public Service Department, street conditions are either poor or fair through- out the area. The only two exceptions are Michigan Avenue and St. Joseph Street which are in good condition. Curbs and Gutters: Although all streets in the NDA have curbs and gutters, repeated resurfacing of the streets has brought the street level nearly even with the curbs. This, combined with deterioration of the curbs because of age and repeated driving over the curbs, has made the 'curb and gutter system ineffective in the area. Replacement will be required to correct this situation. The Public Service Department has.indicated that this work should be done in conjunction with street resurfacing. The costs of curb and gutter replacement are assumed by the city. Sewers: NDA #1, like many other sections of the city, is served by a combined storm and sanitary sewer system which is no longer considered adequate .by the Public Service Department. In addition, State of Michigan Public Act 245 of 1929, Water Resources Act, as amended, prohibits the dumping of raw sewage into public waterways. This, combined with the water standards for the Grand River as established by the Federal Government, makes - 29 - ' the combined system in NDA #1 illegal since during periods of heavy runoff the wastes go directly into the river. The only feasible solution is separation of the sewers. In order to avoid duplicating underground work and tearing up newly paved streets, this work should be done in conjunction with water main replacement and street resurfacing. Water: Most of the water services to individual homes have been updated, but 139 old services (prior to 1926) still exist. The efficiency of the water system would be increased by updating those old services. Water mains are generally adequate in the area for the existing needs, but two areas are not. Portions of Lenawee Street and Huron Street cur- rently have only four inch water mains. The Public Service Department and the Board of Water and Light verify that increased water consumption in recent years necessitates the installation of six inch water mains. Two fire hydrants need to be installed, one on Lenawee and one on Hillsdale. They are needed because of the forthcoming changes in the Logan/Birch. circulation system. ' Street Lights: The entire NDA, with the exception of Jenison Street, is served by mast arm mercury vapor type lighting on existing utility poles. The light produced by these is adequate for residential areas. Jenison Street is served by incandescent lights on low profile poles. This lighting is not considered adequate by the Board of Water and Light. Incandescent lighting is considered inefficient when compared to mercury ' vapor and eventually the Board proposes changing the entire City to mercury vapor. In addition, the lighting on Jenison needs to be rewired and new poles installed. Because of the new Vivian Riddle School and Kingsley Place, low profile lighting will be installed along Huron and Kalamazoo Streets to conform with the lighting in the park and school grounds. Then only Lenawee, Hillsdale, ' and Rul'ison will not have the low profile residential lighting fixtures used throughout the area. Street Trees: The NDA and the area surrounding it have been distinguished by an abundance of mature trees. Unfortunately, the loss of many elms in recent years has left portions of the area without trees. Maintenance and replacement of the neighborhood's street trees are necessary to revitalize the environment and appearance of the NDA. But the City's allocation of funds for street trees has not allowed the City Forestry division to keep pace with the large number of diseased tree removals and replacements through- out the city in recent years. Infestation: The NDA receives city vector control equally with other areas of the city. However, the City Parks and Recreation Department notes the NDA as a problem area with increased rodent population. They suggest that an increased prevention and control program is -needed to bring the area up to city standards. - 30 - Problems: - Street pavement conditions are in fair or poor condition in most of the area. - Curbs and gutters are in deteriorating condition in much of the area. - The city is required by law to separate the combined sewer system. - 139 services to individual homes are inadequate. - Water mains on portions of Lenawee and Huron are inadequate. - Two new fire hydrants are needed on Lenawee and Hillsdale. - Street lighting is inadequate on Jenison Street. - Existing poles and wiring are inadequate on Jenison. - Seven trees and their stumps need to be removed. - Nine other stumps need to be removed. - Thirty-three replacement trees need to be planted. - The vector control program is inadequate. G. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS The term environment encompasses a wide variety of elements pertaining to people and their surroundings. These elements include air, noise, water, soil, flood plain areas, wildlife, people, circulation patterns, housing, vegetation, sewer systems, water supply, public safety and almost any other thing that will affect one's life. Several sections of this document deal with many elements of the environment as described above, such as circulation patterns, housing conditions and general public facilities (sewer systems, etc.). It is the intent of this .environmental section to discuss significant environmental concerns of NDA #1 not discussed elsewhere in this document. Air Pollution: The ambient air (surrounding air) standards set by the Environmental Protection Agency are being met in the NDA for all pollution types, including: carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and suspended air particles. The Department of Natural Resources has indicated that present levels of industrial pollution are being decreased through ongoing programs by the Board of Water and Light and Fisher Body. However, pollutants from prevailing winds and roads and streets are more difficult to control. - 31 - Noise Pollution: The Environmental Impact Statement prepared by the Michigan State apartment of Highways and Transportation for M-99 (Logan Street) identified a projected noise problem from traffic along the south - bound lanes of the Logan/Birch Street system between Kalamazoo and St. Joseph Streets. Those houses within 75 feet of the center of the nearest movement lane will be adversely affected. Four homes not being considered for acquisition are within the distance. The Highway Department has also stated that houses along St. Joseph Street are adversely affected by noise, but the degree of the effect has*not been determined. Water Pollution: There is no identifiable water pollution within the NDA. However, the combined sanitary and storm sewers in the area con- tribute to the pollution of the Grand River during times of heavy runoff. Solid Waste Disposal_: Although NDA #1 is served by the City of Lansing's solid waste disposal program, solid waste disposal problems still exist. Housing inspectors indicate "improper storage, disposal and maintenance," specifically in accessory structures and immediate surroundings,as a major environmental problem. The accumulation of debris and improperly stored or maintained items produces both fire and health hazards in much of the area. Chances of rodent and insect infestation are also increased tremendously by the above described problem. In addition to being a health and fire hazard, the debris and improperly stored or maintained items" detract from the appearance of the area. Problems: - Homes near the proposed Birch Street will be adversely affected by the traffic noise from the new southbound lanes. - Homes along St. Joseph Street are adversely affected by traffic noise. - Combined storm and sanitary sewers contribute to pollution of public waterways. - Improper storage, disposal, and maintenance in structures and on parcels produce health and fire hazards. - 32 - VI • NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA 1 PROPOSALS A. PHYSICAL PROGRAM RECOMMENDATIONS Housing: All of the dwellings within the NDA are eligible for either rehabilitation or acquisition treatment. The eligibility of each structure is based on the physical condition of the structure and/or its relationship to public improvements proposed for the area and/or development problems of the parcel. All structures not being acquired and demolished are recommended for rehabilitation activities. Twenty-six residential structures and one com- mercial structure in the NDA are being proposed for acquisition. Of these, at least ten residences must be demolished because of poor physical conditions. The remaining sixteen residential structures will qualify for rehabilitation if adequate parcels can be found on which to relocate them. The remaining 229 residential structures in the NDA, of course, also qualify for rehab- ilitation. Rehabilitation requires compliance with the City of Lansing's Housing Code. Housing codes are designed to require that all structural, mechanical and electrical components of the structures and all environmental aspects of the surroundings are not dangerous to the health, safety or welfare of the residents.) Those elements which are noted by qualified inspectors as violations must be brought up to minimum standards. The following items are included: 1. Structural: All repairs necessary to assure that the construction of the building will provide: A. Sufficient structural strength and rigidity. B. Necessary resistance to the elements. C. Adequate protection against decay, insects, rodents, and other destructive forces. 2. Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing: All repairs necessary to provide adequate facilities in the dwelling that will meet the needs of the intended occupants and be of a quality and condition which will assure: A. Safety of operation. B. Adequate capacity for its intended use. C. Protection from moisture, corrosion or other destructive elements. 1Lansing Uniform Housing Code, February 10, 1975. - 33 - ' 3. Environmental: All repairs or actions necessary to protect life, limb, health, property, safety and welfare of the general public and the owners and occupants of the area to assure: A. Safety from fire. B. Security from health hazards. C. Conformance with zoning code. ' In addition, the Citizen's District Council is proposing a set of recommended rehabilitation standards. These recommendations are designed to guide property owners in their rehabilitation efforts by suggesting L additional items which are important for adequate housing and environment. These rehabilitation activities may be funded through the City's loan and grant program, and in fact, in order to be eligible for the loan and grant program owners must agree to satisfy all of these items (to the extent that can be.supported by loans and/or grants under the residential rehabili- tation loan program) in addition to complying with the Lansing Code of Ordinances. These items include: 1. Insulation: Every home shall be insulated, to reduce the amount of heat loss from the dwelling, to conserve on fuel and reduce fuel costs and to ,provide comfort for the residents. 2. Storms and Screens: All exterior windows and doors shall be provided with storms and screens to reduce heat loss through window and ' door areas, to protect against moisture, and to protect aginst rodents and insects entering the dwelling. 3.. Fire Detection: Fire detection equipment shall be provided in each dwelling in order to provide minimum fire safety to residents, to protect against loss of life and property. ' 4. Cellars and Basements: In every dwelling, cellars and basements shall be free of potentially hazardous or unsafe conditions and maintained reasonably free from dampness to prevent conditions conducive to decay .or deterioration of the structure. 5. Gutters and Downspouts: Each dwelling shall be provided with approved ' receptacles to carry away water to prevent roof drainage from causing dampness in walls or interior portions of the dwelling, and to prevent damage to the property. 6. Site Improvements: All premises shall be maintained in good order to enhance the overall appearance of the premises and neighborhood and to provide for the safe use thereon. A category of optional items has.been added to encourage even more complete rehabilitation of the area. Homeowners are encouraged to improve as many of these as needed to further upgrade the conditions of the dwelling and its surroundings. Details of the items included in the rehabilitation standards are found in the appendix, exhibit I. ' -34- HOUSING REHABILITATION: 1. Rehabilitation Activity I - Rehabilitation to correct code violations, undertake adopted neighborhood rehabilitation standards and implement optional items as desired. 1412 W. Allegan 318 S. Jenison 1226 W. Lenawee (#1) 1205 W. Hillsdale 321 S. Jenison 1226 W. Lenawee (#2) 1224 W. Hillsdale 322 S. Jenison 1230 W. Lenawee 1226 W. Hillsdale 324 S. Jenison 1231 W. Lenawee 1300 W. Hillsdale 325 S. Jenison 1234 W. Lenawee 1308 W. Hillsdale 410 S. Jenison 1235 W. Lenawee 1310 W. Hillsdale 426 S. Jenison 1305 W. Lenawee 1314 W. Hillsdale 500 S. Jenison 1306 W. Lenawee 1315 W. Hillsdale 503 S. Jenison 1309 W. Lenawee 1316 W. Hillsdale 513 S. Jenison 1312 W. Lenawee 1320 W. Hillsdale 517 S. Jenison 1313 W. Lenawee 1321 W. Hillsdale 518 S. Jenison 1314 W. Lenawee 1322 W. Hillsdale 519 S. Jenison- 1315 W. Lenawee 1325 W. Hillsdale 601 S. Jenison 1316 W. Lenawee 1330 W. Hillsdale 617 S. Jenison 1317 W. Lenawee 1332 W. Hillsdale 1117 W. Kalamazoo 1320 W. Lenawee 1402 W. Hillsdale 1119 W. Kalamazoo 1323 W. Lenawee 1408 W. Hillsdale 1125 W. Kalamazoo 1325 W. Lenawee 108 Huron 1127 W. Kalamazoo 1403 W. Lenawee 114 Huron 1137 W. Kalamazoo 1407 W. Lenawee 118 Huron 1139 W. Kalamazoo 1411 W. Lenawee 122 Huron 1203 W. Kalamazoo 1401 W. Michigan 206 Huron 1205 W. Kalamazoo 1403 W.,Michigan 210 Huron 1301 W. Kalamazoo 1405 W. Michigan 224 Huron 1305 W. Kalamazoo 1409 W. Michigan 314 Huron 1405 W. Kalamazoo 1411 W..Michigan 320 Huron 1408 W. Kalamazoo 508 Rulison 324 Huron 1409 W. Kalamazoo 510 Rulison 411 Huron 1122 W. Lenawee 515 Rulison 418 Huron 1124 W. Lenawee 516 Rulison 419 Huron 1134 W. Lenawee 520 Rulison 421 Huron 1200 W. Lenawee 525 Rulison 105 S. Jenison 1201 W. Lenawee 529 Rulison 112 S. Jenison 1202 W. Lenawee 1302 W. St. Joseph 115 S. Jenison 1203 W. Lenawee 1312 W. St. Joseph 121 S. Jenison 1204 W. Lenawee 1314 W. St. Joseph 216 S. Jenison 1208 W. Lenawee 1320 W..St. Joseph 220 S. Jenison 1209 W. Lenawee 1328 W. St. Joseph 224 S. Jenison 1212 W. Lenawee 1334 W. St. Joseph 228 S. Jenison 1219 W. Lenawee 1344 W. St. Joseph 311 S. Jenison 1222 W. Lenawee 1350 W. St. Joseph 317 S. Jenison 1224 W. Lenawee 1500 W. Washtenaw - 35 - 2. Rehabilitation Activity II - Undertake adopted neighborhood rehabilitation standards and implement optional items as desired-1 I 1406 W. Allegan 300 S. Jenison 1404 W. Kalamazoo 1500 W. Allegan 301 S. Jenison 1412 W. Kalamazoo 1203 W. Hillsdale 310 S. Jenison 1415 W. Kalamazoo ' 1209 W. Hillsdale 314 S. Jenison 1418 W. Kalamazoo 1213 W. Hillsdale 332 S. Jenison 1128 W. Lenawee 1217 W. Hillsdale 404 S. Jenison 1132 W. Lenawee 1220 W. Hillsdale 405 S. Jenison 1137 W. Lenawee 1230 W. Hillsdale 413 S. Jenison 1140 W. Lenawee 1233 W. Hillsdale 416 S. Jenison 1141 W. Lenawee 1305 W. Hillsdale 420 S. Jenison 1211 W. Lenawee ' 1311 W. Hillsdale 421 S. Jenison 1215 W. Lenawee 1319 W. Hillsdale 425 S. Jenison 1221 W. Lenawee 1326 W. Hillsdale 428 S. Jenison 1227 W. Lenawee 1327 W. Hillsdale 434 S. Jenison 1302 W. Lenawee 1333 W. Hillsdale 510 S. Jenison 1400 W. Lenawee '1401 W. Hillsdale 514 S. Jenison 1404 W. Lenawee 1500 W. Hillsdale 524 S. Jenison 1408 W. Lenawee 200'Huron 602 S. Jenison 1412 W. Lenawee 318 Huron 609 S. Jenison 511 Rulison 400 Huron 610 S. Jenison 517 Rulison ' 416 Huron 613 S. Jenison 521 Rulison 417 Huron 616 S. Jenison 524 Rulison 424 Huron 623 S. Jenison 1306 W. St. Joseph 426 Huron 1107 W. Kalamazoo 1318 W. St. Joseph 104 S. Jenison 1113 W. Kalamazoo 1336 W. St. Joseph 201 S. Jenison 1131 W. Kalamazoo 1340 W. St. Joseph 204 S. Jenison 1207 W. Kalamazoo 1352 W. St. Joseph, 212 S. Jenison 1215 W. Kalamazoo 1402 W. St. Joseph 213 S. Jenison 1219 W. Kalamazoo 1500 W. St. Joseph 217 S. Jenison 1225 W. Kalamazoo 1404 W. Washtenaw 219 S. Jenison 1231 W. Kalamazoo 1405 W. Washtenaw 223 S. Jenison 1235 W. Kalamazoo 1406 W. Washtenaw 227 S. Jenison 1307 W. Kalamazoo 1408 W. Washtenaw 235 S. Jenison 1400 W. Kalamazoo 1410 W. Washtenaw 1411 W. Washtenaw ' The by the three structures listed below owners. As a result, they were not inspected have not yet been because programmed of refusals into the rehabilitation effort: 1223 W. Kalamazoo, 1301 W. Hillsdale, and 523 S. Jenison. PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS: Kingsley Place: These structures are being acquired to complete the ' acquisition needed for Kingsley Place Park and Recreation Center. These 1No code violations were found in these structures in the preliminary inspection, but if code violations are found in future inspections, rehabilitation will also involve correcting these violations; just ' as under Rehabilitation Activity I. - 36 - are the remaining properties that the city was unable to acquire with other funds available for the project. Kingsley Place will provide open space and recreational area within the NDA and its immediate surroundings. The following structures will be acquired and either demolished or moved to a suitable location: Address # Units 1234 W. Kalamazoo %✓ 1 1300 W. Kalamazoo 1 1304 W. Kalamazoo 1 1306 W. Kalamazoo 1 1308 W. Kalamazoo 1 1310 W. Kalamazoo 1 1312 W. Kalamazoo 1 1316 W. Kalamazoo 1 Subtotal . 8 Physical Condition: These structures are being acquired to remove from the housing stock structures which°are not feasible to rehabilitate. As determined by the City of Lansing's Building Department and Planning Department, these structures are deficient in areas of electrical, mechanical, or structural condition or any combination thereof, and the costs of correcting those problems exceed the worth of the structure. These structures will be acquired and demolished and the parcels remaining will be used for other purposes as shown on the future land use map. Address # 'Units 218 Huron 1 1211 W. Kalamazoo -/ 1 1214 W. Lenawee (#2) 1 1214 W. Lenawee (0) 1 1216 W. Hillsdale 1 1309 W. Hillsdale 1 1212 W. Hillsdale 1 1223 W. Lenawee 1 214 Huron 2 220 Huron 1 Subtotal 11 Public Improvement: Three structures: at 522 Birch, 526 Birch and 518 Birch will need to be acquired for the closing of Birch Street north of Hillsdale. The close proximity of the new southbound Birch Street extension makes the intersection of the small street that serves these three houses dangerous. In addition, the street is a substandard width and has no other outlet. The structures at 1214 W. Lenawee and 1217 W. Kalamazoo will be acquired to provide space for the pedestrian pathway leading from Lenawee to the entrance of the Kingsley Place Park and Recreational Facility. - 37 - Address 522 Birch 526 Birch 518 Birch 1214 W. Lenawee (#1) 1217 W. Kalamazoo Z (1 commercial) Subtotal # Units 1 1 3 1 10 Residential 1 Commercial Parcel Overdevelopment: Overplatting practices in the area produced many lots of substandard size. In an attempt to correct this situation, several structures are being recommended for acquisition and removal. Address # Units 106 Huron 1 120 Huron 1 326 Huron 1 Subtotal 3 In addition, six vacant parcels are proposed for acquisition and replatting. They are: 1. #33-01-17-452-271 Located between 510 and 516 Rulison 2. #33-01-17-452-181 Located between 524 Rulison and 1300 W. Hillsdale 3. #33-01-17-454-172 Part of lots 59, 95, 96, Assessor Plat No. 42 4. #33-01-17-453-161 517 Birch 5. #33-01-17-453-171 519 Birch 6. #33-01-17-453-182 521 Birch Parcels vacated as a result of acquisition and acquired vacant parcels will be used in one of the following ways: 1. To provide necessary space for public improvements. 2. To be replatted as additions to neighboring parcels to eliminate overcrowding. 3. As a relocation site for structures moved from other parcels. Maps 7, 7a, 7b, 7c, and 7d show property acquisition in NDA #1. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES: Improvements of public facilities in the NDA are being recommended to carry out the city's responsibility to support the rehabilitation of the area. MCHICIAN -91 r7 P, Fl, cl 0 = = OD 0 00 El m LJ Ne,.E� a.��IJ� D, � i [F 7lE uo cl P ArEN.E aE10 El Ll E) L 0 17DU0 TOOF1 I I L10 PO E- 0 E= El L L 0 D El Lj I I— I � El UP11 01 _j 'L, L i 389 4 35- t - 3.90 c� Fl, �/U D 00_ Elp 116 0 _i!l-, Do 0 ❑ ID D D [OL- IEJ cs 0 Ll 0 Do UTT 0 D 0 17 c 0 noon 0 O:El U10' m 11 0 0 DD D 00 E 0 1 0 .01- 13 El 0 13 0 01 00 Er l , [:] cqlo D 0 El OR-2-d R-9 R-0 m__ Ono �1_ KAI AtA__7[�_ DO El ❑ El 11 ❑ E?, p El ❑ i ED 0 E--1 C' Ej C3 [j El CID 0 0 11 ElElL D Pi El tij 51-2 ❑ L 91 A, DEHIPITLob [IF] 010 d ID Pill 0 [ID[J. G 0 D [10 Ll 0 u t LENAWEE CLc3sc] ❑Eqj0Dwu�DD0uBu '0 03 J EDO 1�0S 1 ❑l, 0 0 DEI cl ED 1 0 C3 Ei ED tf;� c, ED ci , ;,c] DID 13 0 El db 0 0 E10 El El 00 DID u %__j HN I SDAI E HiLLSDALE Dc 0 0 o r�o oo❑❑ a o�le`.,J� El 0 D CIO []B. -.0 C D Eli 1 00 =El 0 I" cl Ell I El '0 0 C30 LJ El [100 C=l 000 ou a C) [ITIODL STI. JOSEPH 1= Or L0. Lit LE%-EF FC2❑ = 0 cl-- f E-2i NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CITY OF LANSING MICHIGAN FEBRUARY 1, 1976 r-.-% r- L I LCIICIVU PROPOSED PROPERT ACQUISITION SHOWING PARTICULAR BUILDINGS KINGSLEY 0 HOUSING CONDITION a PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT Li OVERDEVELOPED PARCEL • VACANT PARCEL IAP 7 - 39 - 100 y, ^ ool 1M ISI lw 1;1 S 01 121 b O21 L 3�0 Ill I=f � is 051 ql M� 1 nsl I CHELSEA -X WINSHTENAW 001 GII GI 601 591 591 571 sbi 551 91 551 11 521 54511 0 401471 I 451 441 451 421 391 4Q1 411 Oil i 021 IO 051 m 101 III 121 151 I41 I51 Ibl I 181 191 201 211 221 it Nl 251 261 271 1 ■ OY 011 Ail 1 j11 5O1 211 521 pl Ill 4ZI 131 lot 151 Z Q O KALAMAZOO LENAWEE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN FEBRUARY 1, 1976 SECTION 33-01-17 —�,l — LC�3GIfU a ADDRESS ISI Iw a d RIOCK NO. la • to 1 PARCEL NO. NDA bOUNDARY PROPOSED PROPERTY ACQUISITION SHOWING PARTICULAR PARCELS ® KINGSLEY HOUSING CONDITION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT p OVERDEVELOPED PARCEL • VACANT PARCEL ALSO REFER TO THE FOLLOWING LARGER SCALE ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION MAPS TSAP 7a ST JOSEPH - 40 - I NxC HIGAN Iq 00 ALLrr11EGAN w im 01 001 191 l81 oO 171 O6 161 10 16 011 151 0 14 17 Ul 141 is 19 031 330 1�1 20 Z3 041 27 051 OS 1 091 III 24 061 35 071 101 14 DD WASHTENAW I Z O Cr D Z O U) z WASHTENAW 1400 o of 001 171 I(ol It Oil 151 o 141 14 0 17 OZ 1333 131 18 ZI 031 1,21 20 III 2q 25 041 b71 10iijz( 051 06( OSi A O C] O m Z O Cr D 2 OZI ® 031 ®®®® 041 051 405 061 071 ®® 091 091 1400 KALAMAZOO 1400 - v' I g I o Z Z� 05 001 161 151 141 00 131 Z 121 16 13 011 021 21 380 III 18 25 031 O61 101 24 091 2.6 041 051 071 1001 N o o LENAWEE 1300 PROPOSED Property Acquisition ® KINGSLEY ■ HOUSING CONDITION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT OVERDEVELOPED PARCEL • VACANT PARCEL BLOCKS 327, 330, 333, 380, 405 MAP 7 b NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CITY OF LANSING MICHIGAN 1 = 100 - 41 - N 01 �I 17 19 21 OF 051 20 7 00 In z W HILLSDALE VI I T Ur' LMNOINU IVlllall[U/ N 1" = 100' 7 z Oo �,z Z W LENAWEE 1200 1100� to 1 N N — O tn O 001 (031 591 542 532 522 01l 5Sl 57t 561 551 453 0 11 151 10 (IT 15 021 6�1 ❑ 1710 19 i7 031 `a t1 182• 611 60I Z, 041 091 10 I 1� 25 051 0 29 061 071 ON I I 121 oo �� 6 HILLSDALE lu.n(� HILLSDALE lAno 120 0 o N N ti L0 _ o 0 0 0, ►� M o '� o �I 001 Obl z31 2zl 211 09 011 0o1 351 341 331 321 311 301 291 281 271 2(ol 251 z41 13 386 021 011 0? 1 031 041 051 061 091 101 0454 71 I I I 121 l3l 1L ( 4 l7 031 o8i 04-1 051 Z3 o ,1 Ln N O 1400 I300 ST JOSEPH Z Q 0 O J PROPOSED Property Acquisition z KINGSLEY ■ HOUSING CONDITION ❑ PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT ❑ OVERDEVELOPED PARCEL VACANT PARCEL vo U BLOCKS 453, 454 Cr -iAP 7a m NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CITY OF LANSING MICHIGAN 1" = 100' - 43 - Sidewalk - Removal and replacement of 40,000 square feet of sidewalk. Storm Sewer Construction - 1,200 linear feet of new storm sewers will be built on Kalamazoo, Jenison, and Lenawee Streets to separate the storm from the sanitary sewers. Map #8 shows proposed sewer construction. Sanitary Sewer Construction - 4,700 linear feet of new sanitary sewers will be built which will effectively separate sewers on Michigan, Logan, Kalamazoo, Washtenaw and Huron Streets. Map #8 illustrates the proposed sewer construction. Curb and Gutter - 11,700 linear feet of curb and gutter replacement will be required to make curbs and gutters functional. Street Resurfacing - 8,600 linear feet of the existing streets will require resurfacing. Map #9 shows streets proposed for resurfacing. Handicap Ramps - All 26 intersections will require ramp or curb cut construction to meet requirements of the Barrier Free Design Act. Alley Improvements - One alley (between Hillsdale and St. Joseph Streets) will be resurfaced. Street Closings - Lenawee Street will be closed and a cul-de-sac constructed just west of the intersection with the proposed Birch Street. The existing portion of Birch Street north of Hillsdale will be closed to provide an area of open space for recreational purposes. Pedestrian Pathways - An 8 foot wide pedestrian pathway will be constructed between the 1200 block of Lenawee and the 1200 block of Kalamazoo. Street Lighting - Lighting on Jenison Street will be upgraded to meet Board of Water and Light standards. All existing poles, fixtures and lines will be replaced with low profile mercury vapor type lights. Low profile lighting will also be installed in the remainder of the area, eliminating ' lighting from existing utility poles. Street lighting changes are shown on Map #10. Street Circulation Changes - Kalamazoo Street will be changed from a ' one way to a two way residential collector street. Washtenaw will also be two way. ' Water Mains - Replace 1,100 feet of 4 inch water mains on Lenawee (Huron to Logan) with 6 inch mains. Replace 800 feet of 4 inch water mains on Huron (Michigan to Washtenaw) with 6 inch mains. Map #11 shows area of ' water mains that need replacing. Fire Hydrants - Install two additional fire hydrants, one on Lenawee Street and one on Hillsdale Street. -44- 1 MICHIGAN t 4oa i— CHELSEA WASHTENAWV �I 621 w 561 71 W551 91551 525550 14 491 461'471 451 391 401 441 451 4L1 1169 Oil OSI .9 031 10I III 12: IN 141 151 Ib1 I71 101 191 251 261 271 201 211 221 251 241 r a4l M ow Oq osl I i I Z a 0 KALAMAZOO LENAWEE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN FEBRUARY 1, 1976 SECTION 33-01-17 LCl]GVI.J a ADDRESS \ 151 Iw �� KOCK NO. ITI • 1 1 la I PARLEL NO. NDA BOUNDARY , to PROPOSED SEWER CONSTRUCTION 15in.Storm ■1■1■I■It 12 in. Storm 241n. Sanitary 8in. Sanitary If Ap FI ST.JOSEPH --------------- - 45- .v00 MICHiGAN i KNGSLEY ii�i�����• KALAMAZOO �aa I� 391 f y01 I501 991 481471! I 4511I 441 431I4Z1141- / 191 201 211 22i ', Z41 251 261 271 / Z 1 �iii�►iii�ii�iiii� LENAWEE u00 a - 54t1532 52Z 1 ss� 4rl 1 HILLSQALE LF ST.JOSEPH NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN FEBRUARY 1, 1976 SECTION 33-01-17 L CUICINU a X ADDRESS \ a B10C K NO. PARCEL NO. NDA BOUNDARY PROPOSED STREET RESURFACING Street Resurfacing Street Widening m m � - 46 - :.Do I i CHELSEA N LA- - I WASHTENAW == I KALAMAZOO R !t I51 IW 131 , 21 i6 lit o 091 2e T 02i 081 , szg A l y l I I 6 591 001 I i j I vc Oil 2 021 W p _--- 031 b01 i01 % 5BI Ili 121 SU i50i 451 57i 56i-s,i �551�31 i31 141;51i Ib1 1i91 l %. 81471iybl 451 441 43i 411 4'' J 201 211 221 2511241 251 261 27i / am 021 �voo soo ,uo too ,�, �I Odl b5ll � � I i IS4i55Z1522 / ST JOSEPH z Q 0 O J LENAWEE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN FEBRUARY 1, 1976 SECTION 33-01-17 L—tUrNU ADDRESS \ 15, iW UOC K NO. �21 • ic, PARCEL NO. NDA BOUNDARY 1, - PROPOSED STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS NEW LIGHTING — LOW PROFILE TO MEET STANDARDS REPLACEMENT LIGHTING — LOW PROFILE TO REPLACE MAST ARMS ON POLES `AP 10 — 47 — ' Water Services - Replace 139 old plumber installed (prior to 1926) water services between curb box and house with currently approved material. ' Street Trees - Eight trees (diseased elms) and seventeen stumps must be removed and thirty-three new trees need to be planted. The new trees will be four to six inches in diameter and at least twelve feet tall. The species will be determined in accordance with other street trees in the area. Vector Control - Increase the prevention and control program in the ' area. ' B. ESTIMATED PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM COSTS Estimated costs have been assigned to each item within the program recommendations. Public improvement costs were estimated by the department or agency responsible for implementing each improvement. These estimates were determined by using costs of similar improvements and allowing for inflation as well as any significant differences in the project. Housing acquisition costs were based on the assessed value of the structure multiplied by a factor of 2.5 to give approximate market value. Relocation costs for owner occupied units were established at $15,000 (maximum per unit) plus $500 moving expenses. Renters were allowed a maximum of $4,000 relocation plus $500 for moving expenses. A total of $1,360 was added for each structure to cover legal fees involved in closing and taxes. In addition, $1,000 was added to the acquisition cost to pay for demolition. All of these costs will be funded by the Community Development grant. In addition, an average cost of $5,000 per dwelling was assigned for those structures listed under the rehabilitation strategy. Since rehabilitation involves loans as well as grants, this cost per structure will be met by both Community Development and private sector funds (lending institutions). This plan proposes al- locating $567,283 for rehabilitation. It is anticipated that the remaining $557,717 needed for rehabilitation will come from the private sector. These program costs will necessitate an amendment to the Community Development application. It should be noted that all of these figures are estimates and that actual experience will tell us whether or not these costs need to be modified. Physical Development Program Costs: Estimated costs for proposed housing activities include: Estimated acquisition cost of 27 structures and 6 vacant parcels $ 422,020 Estimated relocation cost 216,500 Estimated cost of rehabilitation of remaining residential (229) and secondary structures and parcel redevelopment (C.D. funds = $567,283 and private sector funds = $557,717) 1,125,000 Total estimated costs associated with housing 1,763,520 ' -48- ALLEGAN WASHTENAMV V T l R � 591 Oil 021 671 i0 051 17 Ow Otll I boll W. 5B: OlII 121 I � 4I I 1501 11 i45 11 461141 61 1451 201 2; 251 41 441 1431 all 41� 251 261 271 j / Z41 o« on 0511 1 q E I x p < x I S 8 x KALAMAZOO Z Q Lf O J LENAWEE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN FEBRUARY 1, 1976 SECTION 33-01-17 L C<] C11I Li ADDRESS 15� _ Iw DOCK NO 303 IZI NDA BOUNDARY PARCEL NO. PROPOSED WATER SERVICE CONSTRUCTION •���� 6in. Water Main Fire Hydrant "AP 1 1 ST JOSEPH -- — 49 - Estimated cost of public improvements 1,036,400 Reserve for contingency 370,650 Total estimated costs for NDA #1 $3,170,570 All costs are further detailed in Exhibit #2 in the appendix. C. FUTURE LAND USE Proposed Land Use: Residential development will continue to be the primary land use in Neighborhood Development Area #1. The day care center will be the only non-residential structure remaining in the area. One mixed use structure will also remain (beauty shop and apartments). As a result of the acquisition strategy and the development of the proposed public improvements, 230 residential structures will remain, of which 212 will be single family. The remaining 18 are two-family structures scattered throughout the area. Table 5 (below) details the breakdown of units, structures and land area within the NDA. Table 5 NDA #1 Proposed Land Use Summary Land Use Residential: Single Family Two -Family Community Services: Day Care Kingsley Hillsdale Open Space Vacant: Public Right -of -Way: Streets, Walks, Alley Pedestrian Pathway TOTAL Acre 32.03 29.07 2.96 2.22 .30 .80 1.12 4.47 12.74 12.63 .11 Percent of Total 62% 91% 9% 4% 13% 36% 51% 8% 26% 99% 1% 51.46 100% No. Structures 230 212 18 No. Units 248 212 36 231 249 Since land use in the area will remain largely unchanged, the single family residential land use will remain in basic conformance with the guidelines of the City Master Plan. Map #12 details the future land uses. - 50 - MICHIGAN L_ I El I I ,I ❑ lulule � school espanslcn ; _-_CHELSEA_.- future Rede-lopmem Area } WASHTENAW___ KALAMAZOO COO rQ�. I�}i►a a j �I ��I b1�.6O tlol DE 1. _ ❑_ t- i �o a °'1 i i l I I , I 1 1 I I La Q bo e. I I I Ol I I _ Doi a do i D I p. [lob h j o p❑ _' 000 D DAD d O;aq � a r r `� ra eaia�ar�sr�►�.' j � au.■.cu�c r,. � s 1. \■in18Y.U� 'a4�iu4 �ScI.JS ■ �� ■ ■ 1 In NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CITY OF LANSING MICHIGAN FUTURE LAND USE ❑ SINGLE FAMILY El TWO—FAMILY ® OPEN SPACE 9 DAY CARE CENTER "'AP 12 ST JOSEPH - 52 - NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA 1 :0 P E? ILL` Y- T 10-11 fow. siawl expansion --------- CRWL6b�____ COMMUNITY NUR%RY -470, KINGSLEV PLACE TY CENTER • i,� [In 011 r) d b 0- I _j T SD 0 0 Elt ` 11 cp Q0 ob 5k) P!D 0 0 :cl 1:0011 .0o -D 0! :5� 0i 0i M n 5: i : li i -I. 0 'Mr-T Ep jo, fluoutibacl 13: , L LENAWEE T_ _F Q�oo f � - � 1 r 0 0cFW00 - -- "" - C:] cl! d j CIO d u!do! u ST JOSEPH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CITY OF LANSING MICHIGAN PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE AREA r'AP 13 - 53 - MICHIGAN 0 0 0 0 0� 7151 - - - 121 Ill 001 141 l31 --- OB 091 15 pl o 081 o z 021 327 O 0 to 2 O� (_ 071- - -18 z ------ uj 051 22 N � 0 1400 ALLEGAN Z 1400 00 = 19i 01 i 91 171 06 001 13 01I 1(01 10 151 14 17 071 0 16 19 031330141 1-51 20 0'f l -- Z7 051 Z 061 071 OSI 091 101 �O 35 z W ao 0 0 KALAMAZOO WASHTENAW 1400 o 01 001 (7( l61 11 011 151 141 14 17 OZ 1333 1-61 ISO 2S 0�1 I21 20 1 l 24 25 041 071-;------ 051 06( OS►_ 091 I`t00 t400 cn o Z O 2 KALAMAZOO 05 0o1 161 151 141 "" 131 13 011 121 (6 021 21 380 ill IS 75 031 061 101 z`+ 091 26 04I 051 071 061 LENAWEE PROPOSED Property Disposition BLOCKS 327, 330, 333, 380, 405 oz `1AP 13a oO NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CITY OF LANSING MICHIGAN 1" = 100' - 54 - Iznn KALAMAZOO I l nn I We t�+ o 0 _ o r`i to I I I I o I � I I I I 1 I O �O M M K� N N to N o 001 611 601 591 591 571 561 I � 1 I I I I I 64 I I I I 1 I I I i j I I I I I I I ' 501 521 451 171 181 (91 491 481 47l 461 451 441 4 '�21 411 11 p11 17 02-1 201 711 221 231 2q1 251 261 271 19 031 091 101 111 121 N I'{I 151 i I 21 041 OSI 061 un 051 I 20 I Q _ ,nnl i inn I�VV �c-.vv LENAWEE = LENAWEE 14.00 1300 o o U-) N 03F z (0 251 001 'S41 241 08 Oil -- 231_ 10 z 13 ozl 27l - - Z O-- ---- O CQo0 17 03! -- - 2tl 1�o �(!) Z"' 331 �521 3tl 301 291 2g1 J W 19 D�fl 452 -I51- 701 081 091 101 111 1211 151 41 20 z3 051 19(----24 Obl 07 _ I b!_ 171__ fO o N q N O 1.0 N M M N O O O 1400 1300 HILLSDALE PROPOSED Property Disposition BLOCKS 451, 452 HAP 131) NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CITY OF LANSING MICHIGAN 1" = 100' - 55 - Zo �0 �LID J cr 1400 LENAWEE 1100 00 001 631 I I I I 621; I I I I 591 453 5 11 01II 1601 581 56{ 551 q2 532 17 031----- 21 ---0qI----- I I I 25 051 A101- , ---_� I z4 061 I , � ' 071 081 c:�) M .D N �J- (\t I N I I I 1200 HILL5UALIL- HILLSDALE IWO 120o o ti ^; o 0 0. ti o 0 0 of I , 001 061 I I I I 09 01l 001 351 341 331 321 311 I 291 271 261 251 2�F I Z31 �zzl 211 �3 386 021 021 031 041 051 061 454 091 101 111 (2113l141 011 071 17 0,51 15l 0,+1 051 23 O Lp :I-tO Kul NN — O O 1400 F300 ST JOSEPH PROPOSED Property Disposition BLOCKS 453, 454 I "AP 13c CU m NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CITY OF LANSING MICHIGAN 1'I = 100, - 56 - - Birch Street north of Hillsdale will be closed and the three residential structures remaining along that street will be removed. - Kalamazoo Street will be returned to a two-way street between Jenison Street and Logan Street. Washtenaw will become two-way from Logan to McPherson. - A pedestrian path will be constructed between Lenawee Street and Kalamazoo to allow better access to the new community facility at Kingsley Place and the new Vivian Riddle Elementary School. Map #14 shows proposed circulation in the NDA. Proposed Land Use Changes in the Area Surrounding the NDA: The most significant changes in land use in the immediate surroundings are the removal of residential uses for the construction of Kingsley Place, Vivian Riddle School, and the Logan/Birch Street system. D. PHYSICAL PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AND RELOCATION All development activities for NDA #1 will be implemented by the City of Lansing's Housing and Redevelopment Department, pursuant to the authority and responsibility of Sec. 2A-22 of the Code of City Ordinances adopted May 12, 1975. This Department will perform, but not be limited to, all of the administrative functions described below: I. The delivery of housing rehabilitation services. 2. The enforcement of the Code of Ordinances for the City of Lansing. 3. The acquisition and disposal of designated structures and parcels. 4. The relocation of displaced persons. 5. The improvement of public facilities and services. The Office of Community Development Management will provide management and monitoring service to City Departments to aid the Housing and Redevelopment Department's efforts to implement the physical development plans. Some of the details of responsibilities and implementation procedures are discussed below. Housing Rehabilitation: The Housing and Redevelopment Department is responsible for administering the loans and grants program (Sec. 2A-22(f)) to provide funds to homeowners in the NDA for all repair and improvement costs which qualify under the program. The loans and grants program, as proposed by the City of Lansing, accepted by the Citizen's District Council, and approved by the City Council will include the following: 1. Bank loans at reduced interest rates for those who qualify for normal home improvements loans. Interest rates would be either 0% or 3% depending on ability to pay. 2. Deferred loans (grants) for those clearly unable to repay a loan. Certain future residency requirements are necessary for complete deferment. In addition, the property must be maintained to minimum standards of the Lansing Uniform Housing Code. - 57 - _ g wl QQI 151 ovl wl 131 316 ' � 011 OLI �1 071 IV 21 031 oyl 06 Sop 05 31 a 121 q 3n — Ir1 X MICHK3AN ALLEGAN 4pC iQl � n1 a 001 '� I fillOil p '[ OLI I51 Y V[ ELSEA N 19 o31 IV IYI 1S Is wl 131 ■ 21 051 O61 III - T06'o." a d a WASHTENM 5, TI Ibl :4r r0 I Q11 � 151 0 121 Z7w T o11 31 331 t — Os I I — i[ -" rCl 14 Z ,5 041 071 KK Q91 W 051 ou I I of 40G oz1 loss awl 1ae11 ow � on'os1 � oa _ i-I�I>s!alale�a 001 621 wl ba OA 101 Nlel � I ! % "1 571 SN SS 9N 1521 ^{I501 Ill Ill 1,1 141 151 lbj 171 1 I I 591 v01 WN "1971 1 451 441 1431 Y21 41, / /--- W, "I 221 31MI 251 261 27, Oil - 021 041 i I / I 1 1 !a I q al ala dl a a x1 001 1 j41 i � 211 241 on zil --y �pl ze1 - o,l! 1 511 i 30I' 211 al s31 szl - 452 C& OW wl III IYI 151 Za �- � I121I131 O51 mr KALAMAZOO LENAWEE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN FEBRUARY 1, 1976 SECTION 33-01-17 LtVCfVU ADDRESS 1Sr \ Iw. a BLOCK NO. PARCEL NO. NDA BOUNDARY PROPOSED TRAFFIC CIRCULATION CHANGES I. WASHTENAW, TWO WAY TRAFFIC 2. KALAMAZOO, TWO WAY TRAFFIC 3. PEDESTRIAN LINK 4. CUL-DE-SAC ON LENAWEE 5. ELIMINATE BIRCH 6. NEW SOUTHBOUND LANE FOR LOGAN "AP 14 ST.JOSEPH - 58 - ' 3. Guaranteed loans for those persons unable to obtain a bank loan. The City would guarantee 80% to 100% of the loan. ' 4. Combinations - Any combinations of the above financial tools can be used. ' These financial tools may be used for all owner occupied units. Absentee owners or owners of multiple structures qualify for loans as specified in the program, but do not qualify for grants. The City will ' attempt to be flexible enough in the program to meet the needs of all in- dividual homeowners. Further details of the loans and grants program are in Exhibit #3 ' in the appendix. Other activities and responsible agencies in the implementation of the ' housing rehabilitation services are: Housing Activity Responsibility Publicize loans and grants program and Office of Community Development procedures for obtaining funds Housing and Redevelopment Department ' Second property inspection Building Department Referral by Housing and Redevelopment Department ' Application, administration and verifi- Housing and Redevelopment Department cation of financial status Assessor's impact statement City Assessor Determine method of financial assistance Housing and Redevelopment Department Amend development plan Financial Agreements Prepare Bid documents Obtain Bids Assemble Bidder's lists Select contractor Review proposed rehabilitation Transmittal of approval to bank Notification of acceptance or rejection Housing and Redevelopment Department and Planning Department Housing and Redevelopment Department Building Department Housing and Redevelopment Department Purchasing Department and Building Department Housing and Redevelopment Department Housing and Redevelopment Department Housing and Redevelopment Department Financial institution I - 59 - Housing Activity Closing Perform rehab work Inspection of work Final report Disburse funds Follow up Counseling Code Compliance: Responsibility Financial.institutions and Housing and Redevelopment Department Contractor Building Department Housing and Redevelopment Department Housing and Redevelopment Department Human Resources Department Housing Code: Enforcement of the 1975 basic housing code is the responsibility of the Building Department. The code compliance program involves not only initial inspections of code violations, but also follow through inspections to determine that compliance activities have been correctly followed. Compliance costs to the residents and homeowners within the NDA are incorporated into the City's loans and grants program. Coor- dination between housing code compliance activities and the loans and grants program is the responsibility of the Housing and Redevelopment Department. Zoning Code: Compliance with zoning districts designated within the NDA will be required to eliminate all illegal uses. This will include the elimination of illegal multi -family uses, front yard parking violations, and wherever possible, will require conformance with acceptable lot sizes, setbacks, use of accessory structures, building height, and other code related items. Enforcement of the City of Lansing Zoning Code is the responsibility of the City Planning Department. The Citizen's District Council will be notified of any proposed zoning changes within the NDA. Costs associated with enforcement of the zoning code will be eligible under the City's loans and grants program and administered by the Housing and Redevelopment Department. Property Acquisition and Disposal: The Housing and Redevelopment Department will be responsible for the acquisition and appropriate disposal of all structures and parcels, including those acquired for public improve- ments. It will coordinate all demolition activities and all activities associated with those acquired structures proposed for relocation to another site. In addition, it will be responsible for rehabilitation efforts of those structures prior to their resale. Replatting of parcels for reuse will be coordinated by Housing and Redevelopment by using an assessor's plat for the area, in accordance with Act 288, P.A. 1962, State of Michigan, section 201 through 213 (Subdivision Control Act). Relocation of Displaced Persons: All persons displaced by Community Development activity within the NDA will be relocated in accordance with the relocation program established by the City of Lansing. The overall relocation ' program is the responsibility of the Housing and Redevelopment Department. Relocation services for families and individuals are coordinated by the Community Development Housing Relocation Office, a centralized relocation ' agency funded by Community Development and operated under the direction of the Housing and Redevelopment Department. ' SUPRIY of Relocation Housing: An estimated 21 families (58+ individuals) Will be sp ace y acqu s t on activities in NDA #1. This represents 8.5% of the NDA's households. Of these, 20 households are black and 1 is white. Area wide, the NDA is 88.5% black. Incomes of those displaced families range from $1,500 to $35,000, and their estimated mean income is approximately $9,000. ' The City's housing supply indicates that suitable standard condition relocation housing within the rents or prices affordable by the affected households is available for those households. According to the approved Housing Assistance Plan for the City of Lansing (Table 1 - Survey of Housing Conditions, fiscal 1976) there are 3,670 standard condition vacant dwelling units in the housing supply. This represents seven percent of Lansing's total housing supply. Other information on characteristics of Lansing's housing stock is available in the fiscal 1977 Housing Assistance Plan for the City of Lansing. Methodology for Obtaining Relocation Housing: Sources of Relocation Housing: The Relocation Office has contact with real estate brokers in the area to secure their rental and sales listings. The Relocation Office also maintains listings of names and addresses of real estate agencies, brokers, and boards in the area which deal in property that may be appropriate as a relocation resource and which is available on a non-discriminatory basis. The local newspapers are also checked for advertisements of suitable accommodations. From these sources the Relocation Office will obtain accommodations to which it can refer relocatees. Before any referrals are made, however, the property will be inspected to establish whether or not it meets the relocation standards. The Relocation Office will utilize the periodic listings of FHA and VA acquired properties which are available for inspection by all relocation families and individuals. The list of relocation resources will not include „housing which is scheduled for clearance under existing or proposed projects or other governmental activity. Relocation Standards: The Relocation Office and the Building Department will inspect each dwelling unit (to which a relocation family or individual moves) to determine whether the dwelling meets relocation standards. The inspection will deal in the following areas .. sanitary facilities, cooking facilities, heating facilities, lighting facilities, structural condition and occupancy. Relocation housing, to be acceptable, must be one that is not subjected to unreasonable environmental conditions, natural or manmade, must be reasonably accessible to places of employment, and generally not less desir- able in regard to public utilities and commercial facilities than the project area. - 61 - Temporary Relocation: A family or individual will not be asked to accept temporary relocation unless it is necessary to accomplish certain project ob- jectives without unreasonable delay. Public Facilities Improvements_: The Housing and Redevelopment Department will ensure that scheduling of public improvements is not in conflict with housing rehabilitation activities or other public improvements. Responsibilities for actual activity on public improvements are listed below: Ar_ti vi ti Ps Sidewalk replacement Storm and sanitary sewer separation Street resurfacing Curb and gutter replacement Construction of handicap ramps Pedestrian pathway development Street cul-de-sacs and closings Hillsdale open space development Rodent control program Street tree'removal and replacement Fire hydrant installation Water main replacement Installation of water services Street lighting replacement Utility pole relocation Traffic and street changes Responsible Agency Public Service Department Parks Department Board of Water and Light Traffic Department Time Schedule: The time schedule below furnishes general procedural times for implementation of the Development Plan. In addition to this, within thirty days of the adoption of the Development Plan by the City Council, the Housing and Redevelopment Department will submit a work program with specified dates for implementation to the Office of Community Development Management. - 62 - Time Schedule Week of February 22, 1976 Environmental Assessment for NDA #1 and NDA #2 is advertised for public review. February 23, 1976 Council receives recommendations from the Citizen's District Council #1 and Planning Board and sets Public Hearing date on the Neighborhood Develop- ment PTan for NDA #1. March 13, 1976 Notice of intent to request release of funds for NDA #1 and NDA #2. March 19, 1976 Release for funds forwarded to HUD. March 19, 1976 Loans and Grants Program submitted to City Council. March 30, 1976 Public hearing is held on Development Plan. May 3, 1976 City Council holds final Public Hearing in Council Chambers. May 4, 1976 NDA plan as revised during Public Hearing submitted to CDC. May 12, 1976 Citizen's District Council submits comments disapproving the Neighborhood Development Plan. May 17, 1976 Council introduces ordinance for adoption of the Neighborhood Development Plan. June 11, 1976 30 day hold period requested by CDC, in conformance with P.A. 344, 1945, as amended, expires. June 28, 1976 City Council approves the Neighborhood Develop- ment Plan and Loans and Grants Program to be given immediate effect in ordinance. June 29, 1976 The Housing and Redevelopment Department implements the Housing Program. June 29, 1976 Public improvements projects are implemented. June 29, 1976 Appraisals and negotiations initiated for property acquisition. July 1, 1976 The Housing and Redevelopment Department implements Loans and Grants Program. December 31, 1,976 Mid -Year program review of Loans and Grants Program. June 30, 1977 The total number of the rehab units in NDA #1 will be completed and the remaining units acquired. - 63 - APPENDIX EXHIBIT #1 NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA #1' NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION STANDARDS I. OBJECTIVES OF REHABILITATION PROGRAM A. Code Compliance Since the Lansing Uniform Housing Code provides minimum requirements for all existing reiidential buildings within the City of Lansing, it is to be utilized as the minimum guideline for all residential rehabilitation work to be undertaken in the development areas. The Code Compliance objective is to correct all violations that exist, as determined by the building official or his authorized representative, in order to protect life, limb, health, property, safety, and welfare of the general public and the owners and occupants of residential buildings. B. Rehabilitation Standards The objective of the neighborhood rehabilitation standards is to provide better housing along with reduced operating and maintenance costs, improved long term residential values and neighborhood conditions by improving items beyond code requirements. C. motional Repairs and Improvements The objective of the optional repairs and improvements is to further improve the structure and living environment beyond code requirements and rehabilitation standards for the occupants and residents of the neighborhood. II. AUTHORITY The building official will be authorized and directed to administer, interpret, and enforce all of the adopted neighborhood rehabilitation standards. III. REHABILITATION REQUIREMENTS In order to be eligible for the loan and grant program owners must be prepared to comply with the following: A. Repairs Required to Meet Code All repairs deemed necessary by the building official and/or his authorized representative in order to correct violations to the Lansing Uniform Housing Code shall consist of: 1. Structural: All repairs necessary to assure that the construction of the building will provide: (a) Sufficient structural strength and rigidity - Al - (b) Necessary resistance to the elements, (c) Adequate protection against decay, insects, rodents, and other destructive forces. ' 2. Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing: All repairs necessary to provide adequate facilities in the dwelling that will meet the needs of the intended occupants and be of a quality and condition which will assure: ' (a) Safety ,of operation, ' (b) Adequate capacity for its intended use, (c) Protection from moisture, corrosion or other destructive elements. ' 3. Environmental: All repairs or actions necessary,to protect life, limb, health, property, safety and welfare of the general public and the ' owners and occupants of the area to assure: (a) Safety from fire ' (b) Security from health hazards (c) Conformance with zoning code.* B. Neighborhood Rehabilitation Standards Items deemed necessary to fulfill requirements (to the extent ' that can be supported by loans and/or grants under the residential rehabilita- tion loan program) established by the Citizen's District Council in NDA #1 consist of: 1. Insulation: ' Basis - Every home shall be insulated, to reduce the amount of heat loss from the dwelling, to conserve on fuel and reduce fuel costs and to -provide comfort for the residents. ' Solution - Insulate attic areas in accordance with approved standards. 2. Storms and Screens: Basis - All exterior windows and doors shall be provided with ' storms and screens to reduce heat loss through window and door areas, thereby conserving energy and reducing operating costs to occupant, to protect against moisture, and to protect against rodents and insects entering the dwelling. Solutions - All exterior doors shall be provided with aluminum combination storm and screen doors, or other approved types, having a self - closing device. All windows shall be provided with aluminum combination storm and screen windows, or other approved types. ' -A2- 3. Fire Detection: Basis - Fire detection equipment shall be provided in each dwelling in order to provide minimum fire safety to residents, to protect against loss of life and property. Solution - Every dwelling shall be provided with approved detector(s), as specified under Section 1413 of the Uniform Building Code, 1973 Edition, as adopted by the City of Lansing. 4. Cellars and Basements: Basis - In every dwelling, cellars and basements shall be free of potentially hazardous or unsafe conditions and maintained reasonably free from dampness to prevent conditions conducive to decay or deterioration of the structure. Solutions - Existing concrete floors which are severely pitted, cracked, broken -up or otherwise defective or deteriorated shall be repaired. In cellars or basements where an excessive amount of water accumulates, sump pumps, drain tile, waterproofing of interior wall surfaces or another acceptable method of correction shall be provided. 5. Gutters and Downspouts: Basis - Each dwelling shall be provided with approved receptacles to carry away water to prevent roof drainage from causing dampness in walls or interior portions'of the dwelling, and to prevent damage to the property. Solution - All dwellings shall have gutters and downspouts with discharge directed away from the dwelling. Discharge extensions and/or splash blocks shall be provided to prevent soil erosion. 6. Visual and Site Improvements: Basis - All premises shall be maintained in good order to enhance the overall appearance of the premises and neighborhood and to provide for the safe use thereon. Solutions: - Exterior wall surfaces,'roof overhangs, and trim around windows and doors shall be painted in accordance with acceptable standards or protected with aluminum or vinyl siding and trim. Window and door frames shall be protected in the same manner as that used to protect the exterior wall surface. - Window and door frames in masonry walls shall be painted or encased in aluminum. - Fill dirt shall be provided where required to provide drainage away from the foundation walls. - Accessory structures shall be repaired as required in accordance -A3- ' with the Lansing Uniform Housing Code and the neighborhood rehabilitation standards,'or demolished. - Openings in accessory structures shall be secured by providing ' adequate doors and windows. - All existing fences shall be repaired in accordance with ' acceptable standards, removed or replaced. - Trees adjacent to dwellings and accessory structures shall be trimmed so that no portion of them contacts the building in any manner. - Provide improved drives and parking areas which consist of ' concrete and/or blacktop. Gravel may be used beyond the rear wall of the dwelling. - Approach walks and steps for all weather access to the dwelling shall be provided as required and shall be of either concrete, blacktop (not to be used for steps) or stone slabs. All approach walks and steps that run from the city sidewalks to the dwelling shall be of poured concrete. - Landscape as required to prevent soil erosion, shall consist of (A) sod and/or seed, bushes, and shrubs in front yard ' areas, (B) seed in rear and side yard areas, (C) retaining walls as required. C. Optional Repairs or Improvements Repairs or improvements that would be eligible for funding under the ' program, after items (A) required repairs and (B) neighborhood rehabilitation standards have been met. Owner may select items from this list as needed, subject to the availability of funding. Kitchen - Renovate kitchen area, including new kitchen cabinets, restoration of floor, walls, and ceiling. Sink, stove, or cooktop unit and oven may be provided if built in. Bathroom - Renovate bathroom areas, including restoration of floor, walls, and ceiling. Bathtub, water closets, sinks, and vanities may be provided. Interior Restoration - Renovate interior surfaces. ' Electrical - Additional supplied electric convenience outlets may be provided in each habitable room, not to exceed those required by ' the National Electrical Code. Mechanical Thermostats of the improved type, with heat anticipator and enclosed contacts to provide more uniform control of furnaces and ' energy may be provided. Hanley -Brown conversion burners that are adequate under the code, due to the unavailability of repair parts, may be replaced. -A4- Self powered humidifier on gravity type furnaces and non -powered humidifier on forced air type furnaces, of an approved self flushing, non-combustible type, surface mounted with no portion of the unit projecting over the heat exchanger, may be provided in order to conserve on energy and provide comfort for the occupants. Plumbing - Water distribution systems that are made up entirely or partially of older iron piping may have that portion consisting of iron pipe replaced. Hot water heaters which do not provide an adequate supply of hot water to meet the demands of the occupants may be replaced. Cellars and basements - Install poured concrete floors. Waterproof interior surfaces of existing foundation walls. Insulation - Insulate walls and floors over unheated spaces and exterior walls. Security locks - Install security locks on all exterior doors. Fire extinguisher - At least one fire extinguisher of a 2A:10BC rating may also be provided. Accesstory Structures - Accessory structures demolished under this program may be replaced with similar structures as permitted by present codes. Funding under this program would be limited to the amount necessary to repair the existing structure. Fences - Install fencing as needed around yard areas. Landscaping - Premises may be landscaped, to include trees, shrubs, grass, etc. in order to enhance the overall appearance of the premises. Deficient code items - Any item covered by the Housing Code which is determined to be deficient (a potential violation) by housing inspectors, health inspectors, fire inspectors or zoning inspectors. -A5- EXHIBIT #2 NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA #1 ESTIMATED COSTS HOUSING ACQUISITION PROGRAM Kingsley Place Estimated Estimated Estimated Address # of Units Acquisition Cost* Relocation Costs Total 1234 W. Kalamazoo 1 17,250 4,500 21,750 1300 W. Kalamazoo 1 22,050 4,500 26,550 1304 W. Kalamazoo 1 20,250 15,500 35,750 1306 W. Kalamazoo 1 22,450 15,500 37,950 1308 W. Kalamazoo 1 20,550 0 20,550 1310 W. Kalamazoo 1 20,750 4,500 25,250 1312 W. Kalamazoo 1 21,450 15,500 36,950 1316 W. Kalamazoo 1 17,250 4,500 21,750 Subtotal 8 162,000 64,500 226,500 Physical Condition 218 Huron 1 9,860 Vacant 9,860 1211 W. Kalamazoo 1 15,360 Vacant 15,360 1214 W. Lenawee (#2 1 7,110 Vacant 7,110 1214 W. Lenawee (#fl 1 7,110 Vacant 7,110 1216 W. Hillsdale 1 11,860 15,500 27,360 1309 W. Hillsdale 1 15,110 Vacant 15,110 1212 W. Hillsdale 1 10,610 15,500 26,110 1223 W. Lenawee 1 11,110 4,500 15,610 214 Huron 2 13,110 4,500 17,610 220 Huron 1 14,860 15,500 30,360 Subtotal 11 116,100 55,500 171,600 Public Improvements 522 Birch 1 13,110 15,500 28,610 526 Birch 1 14,860 4,500 19,360 518 Birch 3 17,110 4,500 21,610 1214 W. Lenawee (#1) 4 14,110 13,500 27,610 1217 W. Kalamazoo 1 22,360 12,000 34,360 (1 Commercial) Subtotal 10 81,550 50,000 131,550 (1 Commercial) *Acquisition cost is defined as . . . assessed value multiplied by a factor of 2.5, plus $1,000 for demolition, plus $1,360 for closing costs. Kingsley Place Acquisition Costs are estimates obtained from Kingsley Place Project Coordinator, Office of Community Development, January 1976. -A6- 0 Parcel Overdevelopment I Estimated Estimated Estimated Address # of Units Acquisition Cost Relocation Costs Total 106 Huron 1 15,360 15,500 30,860 120 Huron 1 15,860 15,500 31,360 326 Huron 1 15,360 15,500 30,860 Subtotal 3 46,580 46,500 93,080 Housing Program Totals 31 Dwelling Units 406,230 216,500 27 Structures 1 Commercial Use 622,730 Vacant Lot Acquisition Parcel No. Location Size Estimated'Acquisition Cost 33-01-17-452-231 510-516 Rulison 40 x 109 ft. 2,750 , 33-01-17-452-181 524 Rulison 36 x 90 ft. 2,250 33-01-17-454-172 Part of lots 59, 95, 4,000 96, Assessor Plat No. 42 33-01-17-453-161 517 Birch 40 x 100 (irregular) 2,780 33-01-17-453-171 519 Birch 40 x 60 ft. 2,025 33-01-17-453-182 521 Birch 40 x 105 ft. 1,985 Subtotal TOTAL (Housing acquisition and relocation plus vacant lot acquisition) 15,790 1 $638,520 ' -A7- PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Total Estimated Project and Location Costs Remarks Sidewalk Replacement 40,000 Eligible sidewalk replacement in the NDA will be paid with public funds; the remainder will be assessed to the property owners but will be eligible for inclusion in the loans and grants program. Storm Sewer: $ 50,000 Jenison 15" sewers Kalamazoo 12" sewers Lenawee 12" sewers Curb and Gutter $ 74,000 Replacement of 11,700 linear feet Replacement: Allegan Washtenaw Lenawee Jenison Huron Rulison Hillsdale St. Joseph Sanitary Sewer: $345,000 Michigan 1901000 24" sewers Kalamazoo 12" and 8" sewers Washtenaw 8" sewers Huron $155,000 8" sewers Lenawee 12" sewers Street Resurfacing: $ 52,000 8,600 linear feet Jenison Huron Allegan Lenawee Hillsdale Alley Rulison Kalamazoo Street $ 30,000 Resurfacing and replacing curbs and gutters Huron Street Widened $197,000 Kingsley Place Program Handicap Ramps $ 8,000 All 26 intersections Total ' Estima et d Project and Location Costs Remarks Pedestrian Pathway $ 15,200 Development - Kalamazoo Block: $ 4,200 Paving 8 foot path $ 6,200 ' Lighting $ 4,800 Fencing Street Cul-de-sac $ 2,500 Construction of driveways to 1122 and ' 1126 Lenawee Hillsdale Open Space $ 36,400 Recreation development costs: Development ' $ 10,000 Play equipment $. 7,000 Seeding and top soil $ 4,200 ' Path paving (8 foot path) $ 4,000 Fencing $ 7,200 Lighting $ 4,000 Removal of Birch Street fill Rodent Control Program $ 2,600 Street Tree Removal and $ 8,300 Stump removal, planting Replacement Water Mains: $ 22,500 ' Lenawee 1,100 feet of 6" water main ' Huron 800 feet of 6" water main Fire Hydrants: $ 1,300 New hydrants required because of , Hillsdale street changes Lenawee ' Water Services at $ 21,800 139 services must be replaced $157 per home Street Lighting Conversion $ 95,800 , to Low Profile Jenison $ 26,500 Required to meet Board of Water and ' Light illumination requirements Kalamazoo $ 6,000 Provide low profile adjacent to Huron $ 18,800 Kingsley Place Hillsdale $ 10,000 ' Rulison $ 5,000 Replace mast arm lighting with low profile Lenawee $ 16,400 Kalamazoo (Huron to $ 5,300 Jenison) Replace mast arm lighting with low profile Washtenaw $ 3,900 Allegan $ 3,900 ' - A9 - Total Estimated Project and Location Costs Utility Pole Relocation: $ 22,000 Huron $ 12,000 Kalamazoo $ 10,000 Relocation of Electrical $ 12,000 Service Panels on Homes: Huron $ 8,100 Kalamazoo $ 3,900 -------------------------------------- Remarks Relocation of poles to rear lot lines or to south side of Kalamazoo along front property line Electrical service drop panels moved from front of structure to rear corner of structure 27 homes 13 homes TOTAL (Public.Improvements)$1,036,400 Total costs for public improvements will be apportioned between the City of Lansing and property owners based upon city procedures for levying of special assessments. TOTAL PROGRAM COST ESTIMATES Total (Housing Acquisition and Relocation plus vacant lot acquisition) Total (Rehabilitation - $567,283 C.D. cost + $557,717 Private Sector funds) Total (Public Improvements) Reserve for Contingency GRAND TOTAL $ 638,520 $1,125,000 $1,036,400 $ 370,650 $3,170,570 -A10- EXHIBIT #3 NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AREA #1 CITY OF LANSING RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION LOAN PROGRAM (R.R.L.P.) GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Long Term: The elimination of slums and blight, the prevention of blighting influences and the deterioration of housing structures and neighbor- hood facilities of importance to the welfare of the community, principally for persons of low and moderate income. Short Term: To assist eligible property owners and residents in eliminating and correcting violations of the Lansing Housing and Zoning Codes. To provide a financial assistance method in meeting Rehabilitation Standards, as established in the development plan for the Westside Neighborhood Development Area. To provide a financial assistance method to meet Optional Work items desired on an individual structure basis, as established in the develop- ment plan for the Westside Neighborhood Development Area. To maximize the impact of Community Development funds by combining with private financial institutes to rehabilitate and upgrade resi- dential structures or dwelling units to the City of Lansing Housing and Zoning Codes and/or defined neighborhood rehabilitation standards as established in the development plan for the Westside Neighborhood Development Area. To improve the condition of housing structures within the Westside Neighborhood Development Area, and the surrounding district areas, to the maximum extent feasible within available financial resources by means of subsidizing the interest of loans, guaranteeing loans, and/or providing grants (deferred loans) to eligible property owners or residents. GENERAL ELIGIBILITY STANDARDS SECTION I. (1) The subject residential structure or dwelling unit must on property within the Westside Neighborhood Development Areas. Under the R.R.L.P., "adjusted gross income" will culated as follows: - All - be located ' or District be cal- ' Gross Household Income ( Michigan State Tax Form Schedule 4, Line 56) Minus: 5% of Gross Household Income as a general deduction ' Minus: $300 for each exemption claimed on the last filed Federal Income Tax ' return. Minus: $300 additional deduction for each homeowner and spouse over 65 years of age. Minus: $300 additional deduction for each handicapped person as defined by the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, PL 93-112, 29 USCS §706(6). Appropriate certification or verification will be required. 1 Equals Adjusted Gross Income (A.G.I.) In the event a federal income tax return was not filed for the last calendar year, $300 will be allowed for each exemption ' which would have been eligible under the U.S. Internal Revenue Service's regulations. (2) Asset Limitation. Owner -occupants with assets (cash, bonds, ' savings, etc., but not counting house or automobile equity) in excess of $10,000 shall be eligible for interest reduced loans only. ' (3) Owner -occupants shall be eligible for interest reduced loans, deferred loans or guaranteed loans, or any combination thereof, depending upon the nature of individual financial situation pursuant to the R.R.L.P. administrative and processing procedures. (4) Owners of rental structures shall be eligible only for interest reduction of loans to 3% A.P.R. only, as defined below under "Owners of Rental Properties." ' (4) These general eligibility standards are meant to be guidelines and flexibly interpreted on an administrative basis by the Department of Housing and Redevelopment pursuant to §2A-22(f) ' of the Code of City Ordinances to effectuate the purpose of this program, based upon the owner -occupant's ability to pay. I -Al2- FINANCIAL SERVICES OF THE R.R.L.P. Under the City of Lansing's Residential Rehabilitation Program, three (3) basic types of financial assistance methods may be utilized. They are: SECTION II. Commercial Loans at Reduced Interest Rates. (Type A) (1) For those eligible owner -occupants, excluding non-resident owners of rental properties, that have the income capacity, employment history, credit history and other aspects of a financial back- ground that would qualify them to directly receive a home improve- ment loan from a participating bank without a guarantee, the City of Lansing would use Community Development funds to reduce the interest rate on such a loan by direct subsidization. (2) Under this financial assistance method, the effective interest rate payable on a Type A loan would be lowered from the market rate (normal bank rate) as follows: Adjusted Gross Income (A.G.I.) Adjusted Interest Rate Over $12,000 3% A.P.R. Under $12,000 to $8,000 0% (3) For those eligible owner -occupants with an income of over $12,000 , A.G.I., CD funds would directly subsidize the interest cost of a loan extended under the R.R.L.P. to 3% A.P.R. For an eligible owner -occupant with an income under $12,000 A.G.I., CD funds ' will be used to subsidize all interest costs of the loan, if the owner -occupant is otherwise in a position to obtain a bank loan. In addition, the City will provide inspection, architectural, informational, and technical assistance through city agencies at no cost to the property owner. SECTION III. Guaranteed Loans. (Type B) (1) For those eligible owner -occupants unable to obtain a direct bank loan due to any circumstances, including defects in their credit history, the City will use CD funds to provide a guarantee for their performance under the loan. This financial security would then encourage the bank to make the home improvement loan to the owner -occupant under its normal lending procedures. (2) In the event the owner -occupant defaults on a Type B loan, the City will reimburse the bank at least for the net principle amount guaranteed, and would develop a repayment schedule with the concerned owner -occupant. Upon default, the City's interest in the loan would be secured by a promissory note and a lien against the property. The interest rate to the owner -occupant on a guaranteed loan would-be reduced in the same manner as if the loan were a direct bank loan as outlined in SECTION II above. -A13- SECTION IV. Deferred Loans - Grants. Owner -occupants, having an Adjusted Gross Income of $8,000 or less, and who are unable to obtain a bank loan to improve their homes and cannot afford additional indebtedness based upon their individual financial status, the - City will extend a deferred loan - grant directly to the owner -occupant. Under a deferred loan - grant, the principle would be repayable only in certain special situations, as follows: (1) To prevent speculation and encourage long term homeownership, repayment would be required if the owner -occupant vacates, sells, transfers or assigns the subject housing structure within seven (7) years from the execution of the deferred loan - grant agreement in accordance with the following schedule: Elapsed Time from Date of Principle Amount of Execution of Agreement Loan to be Repaid Within 1 year 100% " 2 years 100% 3 years 100% 4 years 70% ' 5 years 50% " 6 years 30% " 7 years 10% ' After 7 years 0% (2) The owner -occupant must agree to maintain the condition of the ' concerned structure at least to the standards of the Lansing Housing Code, until the deferred loan - grant is discharged as stated in SECTION IV(1) above. ' (3) Other provisions of this financial assistance method are as follows: ' (a) No interest on the loan will be charged to or payable from the owner -occupant under any circumstances. (b) In the event of the death of either a husband or wife holding title to the property, the deferred loan would be ' discharged at that time. (c) Only owner -occupants are eligible for deferred loans. (d) To the extent available deferred loan funds will be used ' to defray the cost of correcting Housing Code violations and Work Items known as Rehabilitation Standards, but Optional Work items are not eligible for payment as defined within this development plan. (e) A promissory note would be signed by the owner -occupant as security for the deferred loan, subject to the provisions as stated by SECTION IV herein. SECTION V. Combinations. (1) The three (3) financial tools outlined in SECTIONS II -IV may be used, at the discretion of the Department of Housing and Redevelop- ment, in combination with each other. Upon a review of the - A14 - prospective loan applicant's verifiable financial records, these tools will be used to meet the specific financial needs shown. For example, if the desired rehabilitation work costs $4,000 and the applicant has the capacity to repay a $2,000 loan, the City will be prepared to reduce the interest rate on that loan (either bank loan or guaranteed loan), and also issue a $2,000 deferred loan - grant. SECTION VI. Owners of Rental Structures. (1) Owners of rental structures, when that structure contains more than one (1) residential living unit, i.e. duplex, and the owner resides in one of the residential living units located therein, and where such multi -family structure is in conformance with the Zoning Code, shall be eligible for a Type A interest reduction loan. This loan shall be made in the same manner as owner - occupants having an A.G.I. of over $12,000 per year. The loan proceeds may be used only for correcting Housing Code violations and meeting Rehabilitation Standard work items, but not for Optional work items as defined within this development plan. Owners of up to two (2) single family detached residential structures used for rental purposes shall be eligible for a Type A interest reduction loan. This loan shall be made in the same manner as that offered to an owner -occupant having an A.G.I. of over $12,000 per year. The loan -proceeds may be used only for Housing Code violations and meeting Rehabilitation Standard work items, but not Optional work items. (2) Owners of three (3) or more single family detached residential structures used for rental purposes shall be eligible for interest reduction loans in the same manner as an owner -occupant having an A.G.I. of over $12,000 per year. The loan proceeds may only be used for Rehabilitation Standard work items. (3) Owners of rental structures are not eligible for guaranteed loans or deferred loans (grants) as defined in SECTIONS III and IV herein. In return for this interest subsidy, the owners of rental properties must agree, as a condition of the loan, not to pass the cost of the improvements or the loan by increases in rent to the tenant for a twelve (12) month period. Increased costs for utilities and taxes will be specifically excluded from such a restriction. GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION VII. Flexibility. Because of the vast number of different family situations that can be' encountered in the Westside Neighborhood Development Area, the Department of Housing and Redevelopment will be flexible in developing a financial - A15 - assistance method tailored to meet the needs of any particular family on an individual basis, within the provisions of this program. SECTION VIII. Special Assessments. If any privately owned property is assessed as being benefited by the installation of any public improvement required to implement this Physical Development Plan for the Neighborhood Development Area, said special assessment shall be an eligible work item and the cost thereof shall be used for loan or grant calculation purposes. ■ SECTION IX. Loan and Grant Limitations. In order to insure the long term success of the R.R.L.P. and the provision of its financial services to all eligible owner -occupants, the City must establish basic financial limitations. They are as follows: Loans (Type A and B) $6,000 maximum/structure with the average for the N.D.A. not to exceed $4,000/structure. ' Deferred Loans - Grants $4,000 maximum/structure. The Department of Housing and Redevelopment shall have the authority to exceed these maximum limits in special circumstances if funds are available within approved budgetary allocations. ' The above stated financial limitations per structure are computed exclusive of the cost associated with the special assessment defined as eligible in SECTION VIII above. I -A16- Questions about the contents of this Physical Development Plan may be referred to any of the following persons: Alan E. Tubbs, Planning Director James R. Spackman, Deputy Director Robert G. Harris, Neighborhood Planner Correspondence may be addressed to Planning Department 2nd Floor Washington Square Annex Lansing, Michigan 48933 or telephone (517) 487-1400