The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1995 Demographic Study City of Lansing 5-year Recreation PlanP(C-M:�_, pr C 3 - C�,� IP(.:�ns DEMOGRAPHIC STUDY CITY OF LANS ING 1995 FIVE-YEAR RECREATION PLAN - I I! 11 DEMOGRAPHIC STUDY CITY OF LANSING 1995 FIVE-YEAR I RECREATION PLAN 11 0 r .1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Demographic Stud for the City of Lansing's Five -Year Recreation Plan 1995-1999 was Y tY g > a cooperative effort by Landscape Architects & Planners and the City of Lansing Parks and �. Recreation Department. David C. Hollister, Mayor Marilynn Slade, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS . Ellen Beal Robert Brockwell Sandy Allen Richard Lilly Tony Benavides Howard Jones Paul Novak Mark Canady PARK BOARD MEMBERS Mary Margaret Murphy-Woll John Pollard Wilbur D. Howard George M. Harlow Jr. Sally H. Laurion Judith Filice Mary James Wilbur D. Howard PARKS AND RECREATION R. Eric Reickel, Director Phil Dorland, Deputy Director Dick Schaefer, Landscape Architect CONSULTANTS: Project Managers: Robert Ford, Mark Hornung Landscape Architects & Planners 919 E. Grand River Avenue East Lansing, MI 48823 Prepared By: Don Hamilton, Planner I I In the last analysis most common things will be found to be highly complicated. G.K. Chesterton I 1-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Methodology ........................................ 1 City-wide Baseline Statistics .................................... 3 1990 Census Tract Map ...................................... 6 List of Lansing City Parks .............................. ..... 7 Lansing Parks and Recreation Map with 1990 Census Tracts ..................... Tab 1 Park Profile Briefs ..................................... Tab 2 Park Areas of Immediate Influence Maps ......................... Tab 3 City of Lansing 1990 Census Statistics .......................... Tab 4 City of Lansing 1990 Census Tract Profile Briefs .................... Tab 5 ii 11 1 LANSING PARK STUDY Methodology IThe method used to prepare this report followed two tracks: 1. The collection and reorganization of participant 1990 US Census Data; and 2. The mapping of the city parks with the 1990 census tracts overlaying them. 1990 US Census data were assembled for the City of Lansing and for all the census tracts within the city. The data were sorted and reformatted to provide the best information for park influence analysis. City-wide data were established as the baseline. The data were then analyzed for outstanding characteristics and for unusual or unique features and any such observations were summarized by census tract. The consultants defined each city park by its size, equipment, t, facilities, and location as either Neighborhood, Community, or City-wide.' The parks were then plotted with the appropriate areas of influence and overlaid with a map of the census tracts. The tracts affected by the parks were identified, the data assembled, then analyzed to produce a "Park Profile Brief'. (Some parks, such as Potter Park, have a much greater geographical area of influence. However, the analysis of regional data was beyond the scope of this report.) The initial park areas of influence used in this report were as follows: Mini & Neighborhood parks, 1/2 - 1 mile radius; Community 1-2 mile radius; and City-wide. The definition established for Community parks proved to be unworkable for purposes of seriously examining the differentiating community factors for a park with the community designation. A two mile park influence radius is simply too large an area for making comparisons to the City of Lansing city-wide base values. A circle with a radius of two miles covers an area of approximately 12.6 square miles. All of Lansing is 34.1 square miles. Each Community park circle covered more than 1/3 of the land mass of the community. A Community park could easily "capture" an influence area composed of an even more disproportionate number of total residents or census tracts. For instance, the Miller Road influence circle captured 12 census tracts and slightly more than 36 percent of the city's residents. The Comstock analysis included 24 tracts and was almost 46 percent of the City's population. Aggregations of this magnitude eliminate those unique or unusual characteristics upon which to focus a particular park's development program. I 11 L u 11, As a result of these findings, the consultants examined areas surrounding each Community park which could, in their judgment, represent the physical community that would define the park area for planning purposes. The radius established for this alternative was approximately 3/4 of a mile. It represented an area that, on average, captured the influence of those four to six census tracts immediately surrounding the target park. This is a closer approximation of the true area of influence for these parks. It is the area that defines their physical setting. It is the area that sets the tone for anyone traveling through the area to reach the park, and finally, the local resident population serves as the closest user base for the park. To maintain proportional integrity, the consultants also analyzed the neighborhood parks on this basis, using a one-third mile radius. Indicators for most of the elements of the "Profile Briefs" are straight forward, e.g. income and poverty indices; but some are less direct. Neighborhood stability was measured by the number of years in residency in a particular dwelling unit. Mobility was a measure of both the number of cars and the number of disabled individuals in a tract or park area. Although the logic of both, especially the latter, is somewhat tenuous, the information is valuable for planning, especially planning for areas where a higher percentage of persons have no car, or for areas with disproportionate numbers of disabled persons. The briefs were worded to provide snapshot views of the tracts and park influence areas. When an area of concern or interest is established, the users should refer to the base data for a more complete analysis. Also, no attempt was made to analyze the data in terms of state of national norms. All comparisons are to Lansing City census data. 'Standards taken or derived from National Recreation and Parks Association, Recreating Park & QMn Space Standards & Guidelines, 1983: The Athletic Institute, Planning Areas & Facilities for Health Physical Education & Recreation, 1966: and other sources. 2 CITY-WIDE BASELINE STATISTICS The following is a synopsis of the Lansing City census data` against which all the data of the tracts and parks were compared: 1. POPULATION - 5.2 % more females than males 2. HOUSEHOLDS - median age 29.7 Married couples households 42.0 % Non -family households 37.9 % Single -parent households 20.1 % 3. RACIAL MIX - whites/blacks 92.5 % White 73.9 % Black 18.6 % All other 7.5 % Hispanic origin 7.9 % 4. HOUSING - Overall Housing Utilization Vacant housing 6.1 % Occupied housing 93.9 % Owner occupied 51.4 % Single-family housing is 66.8 % of total Occupancy by Race: Whites 2.36 persons/household Blacks 2.92 American Indian/Aleut 3.15 Asian/Pacific Isl. 4.12 Other 3.59 Hispanic 3.60 Complete city-wide census profile statistics are found at Tab 4 3 4. HOUSING - continued Structures Average units constructed during decade 1940-1980: 8,618 Units constructed during 1980's: 4,957 Neighborhood Stability 56 % of residents moved into their home since 1985 69 % of residents moved into their home since 1980 ('The movement rate since 1985 is the equivalent of everyone moving approximately once every 9 years) Miscellaneous 5.7 % of households have no phone 13.3 % of households have no car 1/3 of homeowners have no mortgage Housing costs as % of household income 14.7 % of homeowners pay more than 30 % of household income 41.2 % of renters pay more than 30 % of household income 5. EDUCATION 29.7 % of residents are in school - and 34.7 % of those are in college. This means that 1 in 10 residents of Lansing is a college student. 21.7 % of residents age 25 + never graduated from high school: 18.4 % graduated from college with a BA or advanced degree 6. DISABILITIES - (non -institutionalized persons) Age 16-64: 1 in 18 ( 5.5 %) with personal disability Age 16-64: 1 in 10 (10.7%) with work disability Age 65+: 3 in 13 (23.0%) with personal disability Age 65+: 2 in 11 (18.1 %) have mobility disability 7. PLACE OF BIRTH Only 3.1% born outside the U.S., but of those, 41.2% came to Lansing during the 1980's 1 1 1 1 1 8. CHILDREN City had 34,912 children under age 18 - (27.4% of total population) Children under age six: 60.3 % of mothers are in the labor force. In 57.2 % of families with children under six, all parents work. For children between six and seventeen: 75.3 % of mothers are in the labor force. In 67.4 % of these families, all parents work. Teenagers: city-wide, 548 (8.3 %) of all persons age 16-19 are not in school, have not graduated, and are unemployed (or are not in the labor force) Children and poverty: See section 10 below 9. LABOR FORCE 2/3 white collar workers; 1/3 blue collar Rank of employers by % of workers Retail trade 19.1 % Manufacturing (durable goods) 11.6 % Public administration 11.4 % Educational services 10.0 % Health occupations 7.7 % 59.8 % Overall 69 % of persons age 16+ are in the labor force and 31 % are not. For men a little higher; women a little lower. 10. INCOME / POVERTY Per Capita Income: $12,232 Percentage in poverty: All ages: 19.4 % Age 65 + 11.4 % Children age 5-17 25.2% Children under 5 29.9 % w/Female head of household: Children age 5-17 53.2% Children under 5 66.0 % LANSING 1990 CENSUS TRACTS r 33.01 32 ! i 31.02 33.02 1 i r----------- i 2 ---- 3 ; i 'i 8 34 ; i 5 7 31.0 3d.01 4 ' 6 10 i 13 14 65 � -_--; _ 40 35 ' 16 15 19 12 i 21 7.01 20 ' 24 ' ' 22 `-- - 17.02 25 ,•---. 26 i 29.01 .01 447 -_- r i r 37 %202.02 36.01 36.02 27 ! 28 ------------- 29.02 214 i._.r 51 53.94 i-- 52.01 53.03 `--' '•'• i 52.02 i i 55.01 6 53.02 w+ba+ar.�ac� �REC"AM NORTH SOD Im Da» IMO ILANSING PARK STUDY: PARK LIST PARK NAME DF9TC7FNATT0 ADADO-RIVERFRONT CITY WIDE ATTWOOD COMMUNITY AVERILL BANCROFT NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY BARB DEAN TOT LOT NEIGHBORHOOD BASSETT NEIGHBORHOOD BECK NEIGHBORHOOD BLUEBELL NEIGHBORHOOD BUCHARD CITY WIDE ' CAESAR-DONORA NEIGHBORHOOD CAVANAUGH COMMUNITY CHERRY HILL CITY WIDE CLIFFORD NEIGHBORHOOD COMSTOCK COMMUNITY COOLEY CITY WIDE CREGO COMMUNITY DAVIS DIETRICH CITY WIDE CITY WIDE DUNNEBACKE NEIGHBORHOOD DURANT COMMUNITY EDMORE NEIGHBORHOOD ELM CITY WIDE ELMHURST NEIGHBORHOOD EVERETT COMMUNITY FAIRVIEW NEIGHBORHOOD FENNER CITY WIDE FERRIS NEIGHBORHOOD FILLEY NEIGHBORHOOD FINE COMMUNITY FOREST VIEW NEIGHBORHOOD FORSTER C.0 COMMUNITY FOSTER NEIGHBORHOOD FRANCES CITY WIDE FULTON COMMUNITY GENESEE NEIGHBORHOOD GEORGETOWN NEIGHBORHOOD GIER C.0 CITY WIDE GLEN EDEN NEIGHBORHOOD 1 7 L� n GRAND RIVER CITY WIDE GRAND WOODS COMMUNITY GRAVES NEIGHBORHOOD GREENCROFT NEIGHBORHOOD HILLBORN NEIGHBORHOOD HILLSDALE NEIGHBORHOOD HOLLY NEIGHBORHOOOD HORSEBROOK NEIGHBORHOOD HULL COURT NEIGHBORHOOD HUNTER COMMUNITY INGHAM NEIGHBORHOOD IRVING NEIGHBORHOOD JONES LAKE NEIGHBORHOOD KALAMAZOO PLAZA NEIGHBORHOOD KAYNORTH NEIGHBORHOOD KENDON COMMUNITY KIMBERLY NEIGHBORHOOD KINGSLEY COMMUNITY KIRCHER MUNICIPAL CITY WIDE LARCH NEIGHBORHOOD LEWTON NEIGHBORHOOD LYONS NEIGHBORHOOD MARSCOT NEIGHBORHOOD MARSHALL COMMUNITY MC KINCH NEIGHBORHOOD NUCHIGAN AVE CITY WIDE MILLER ROAD C.C. COMMUNITY MOORES COMMUNITY MUNN NEIGHBORHOOD OAK NEIGHBORHOOD 119TH ARMORY NEIGHBORHOOD ORMOND NEIGHBORHOOD _ OSBORN NEIGHBORHOOD PLEASANT VIEW COMMUNITY PORTER NEIGHBORHOOD POTTER CITY WIDE PDXSON NEIGHBORHOOD QUENTIN COMMUNITY RANNEY CITY WIDE REASONER NEIGHBORHOOD REGENT NEIGHBORHOOD REOLA NEIGHBORHOOD REUTTER COMMUNITY 3 n RISDALE COMMUNITY RIVERPOINT COMMUNITY RIVERSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD ST. JOSEPH COMMUNITY SCOTT CENTER CITY WIDE SCOTT WOODS CITY WIDE SEVENTH NEIGHBORHOOD SHUBLE CITY WIDE STABLER NEIGHBORHOOD STROUD NEIGHBORHOOD SUNSET HILLS. NEIGHBORHOOD SYCAMORE COMMUNITY TAMMANY NEIGHBORHOOD TECUMSEH NEIGHBORHOOD TRAGER NEIGHBORHOOD TURNER MINI NEIGHBORHOOD TURNER -DODGE CITY WIDE WAINWRIGHT NEIGHBORHOOD WALDO NEIGHBORHOOD WALSH NEIGHBORHOOD WASHINGTON MALL CITY WIDE WASHINGTON CITY WIDE WENTWORTH COMMUNITY WEST SIDE COMMUNITY WILLOUGHBY NEIGHBORHOOD WILSON NEIGHBORHOOD WOODCREEK NEIGHBORHOOD i � Lansing Parks and Recreation Map ' with 1990 Census Tracts E- 1111111 "",®r mra low 11 NMI mWil'ill, LANSING PARK STUDY ' LOCATION OF MAPS 1-7 33.01 32: ' 31.02 i 33.02 � � .----------- .. 2 1 .. 34 '- -'-i 5 7 31.0 � 3�.01 ' 4 --------- ------ --�--� '---------------10 ----. 35 14----- 16 15 12 i 24 ' 22 '--- -; 17.02 25 ; 23 ' ----- 29.01 44.01 -- ----- ------------ ----' -- - - ' ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Fl2m8\L - - - - - - - i 37 36.02 ;202.02 :36.01 27 i -.-------..a 29.02 ' •-ti i 214' i J-- -- --- 51 53. 9 4 52.01 53.03 53.02 i i ' 52.02 i i• 5�.01 ' ' ' JANUARY 1995 LANSING PARK STUDY PARKS WITH CENSUS TRACT OVERLAY VP92M o boo 1000 2000 4000 NORTH PARK PROPERTY & CEMETERY _ SCHOOL PROPERTY = CITY WIDE "'° = CEMETERY 32 ij,7Lou ADA RIVE FRO 1 OF 7 LANSING PARK STUDY PARKS WITH CENSUS TRACT OVERLAY DOWNTOWN LOOP 38L' 0 1 lunm it NORTH PARK PROPERTY &CEMETERY _ SCHOOL PROPERTY A = CITY WIDE Rtr. = CEMETERY 20F7 LANSING PARK STUDY PARKS WITH CENSUS TRACT OVERLAY 0 sw 1000 2000 4000 NORTH W ' PARK PROPERTY & CEMETERY �, "I, � _ SCHOOL PROPERTY A CITY WIDE ua = CEMETERY pu c MOORE'S I BARE 30F7 t RI LANSING PARK STUDY PARKS WITH CENSUS TRACT OVERLAY 9 0 500 1000 2000 4000 IIr- NORTH ureraFAXXS ' PARK PROPERTY & CEMETERY _ SCHOOL PROPERTY = CITY WIDE = CEMETERY 4 OF 7 LANSING PARK STUDY , PARK ARPARKS WITH CENSUS TRACT OVERLAY r ,9-,JWOODCREEK :)N 02,02 HIL A 1 FINE i---------------------------- 0 sw 1000 2000 4000 it NORTH 4ttrNoPAM .rolzcmnm PARK PROPERTY 8 CEMETERY _ SCHOOL PROPERTY = CITY WIDE 9=uo CEMETERY 5OF7 . LANSING PARK STUDY PARKS WITH CENSUS TRACT OVERLAY �36.02BORN W .FORD a GRAVES 1 1 1 1 / HILL JR YKS ■ MILLER RISDALE 37 PLEASANT VIEW ' wCH ' GEORGETOWN on* 52,02 0 51000 2000 .OoO 00 Ir NORTH ' PARK PROPERTY & CEMETERY _ SCHOOL PROPERTY = CITY WIDE EVERETT HIGH ■ LUEBELL GARDNER ■ 0 Z O H W U Q 3 BECK 0 N TH ■ KAII I CD PARCEL B WILLOVGHIY r---1 15 ■01 1 ------j 6 OF 7 IN KENDON AKENDON I RD. ENTER 3HBY om KAYNORTH RJLp LANSING PARK STUDY PARKS WITH CENSUS TRACT OVERLAr----" D wBEEKMAN CENTER 1 7 a I i CAVANAUGH DUNKEL I I 1 MUNN 2 JOLLY 5&02 1 1 � RM!" N, Em MARSCOT 0 500 1000 2000 4000 gtb� reta'� LANMOY KU - NORTH AMRZCPXATM ' PARK PROPERTY &CEMETERY _ SCHOOL PROPERTY -CITY WIDE = CEMETERY 19 uo 70F7 I u Park Profile Briefs I I e i 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 f 1 I 1 1 l Park Name: Classification: Tract(s): Averi l l Neighborhood 36.01 s IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: Almost YV50 black/white Household Characteristics: Families; married couples, but 22% female heads Children: High percentage school age (33%) Relative Age: Normal Education: Above normal Employment: High percentage in labor force Income: Middle Housing: Single-family; owner occupancy (1950-70) Neighborhood Stability: Stable Mobility: Mobile, but a number of disabled in tract Unusual or Unique Charati ,s cteiis • High rent with 45% paying +35% of income 0 High number of persons/unit (3.1 owner occ. & 3.5 rental) • High percentage of disabled +65's • High percentage of all parents in work force • high poverty in unrelated ind. & children under 5 Park Name: Attwood Classification: Community Tract(s): 52.01, 53.03 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Age: Education: Employment: Income: Housing: Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: White (82.3) Families: married couples Norm Norm (Median 30.5) Norm - more H.S. grads/ fewer college Norm - except higher men & both parents working Norm - (Per Capita of $12,474) 50150 Owner/renter - s.f./ multi f. most bldg 60's/70's Norm Norm Unusual or Unique Characteristics High % of school age children 65 + only poverty above norm Only 8.6 % no car 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Bancroft Classification: Community Tract(s): 1, 8, 9, 31.01, 31.02 EMNIIEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Age: Education: Employment: White (81.2) Black (8.0) Hispanic (12.7) High families due to high married couples Norm (27.1 % of population) Norm (Median 31.7) Norm+ : above norm graduate degrees Norm Income: Norm (Per Capita of $13,111) Housing: 71 % s.f. ; 57% owners - mixed const. periods Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: Stable Low physical limitations Unusual or Unique Characteristics 29.1 % no car Ca Park Name: Barb Dean Tot Lot Classification: Neighborhood Tract: 20 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White with 19% black and 12% Hispanic origin Household Characteristics: Families with married couples, but 23% female heads and 43% non -families Children: More and quite young Relative Age: Normal (27) Education: Low Employment: Low percentage in work force; high unemployment Income: Low Housing: Renter 58%; s.f.=m.f. (2 to 4 units predominate); very low value owner occupancy ($29); older stock (pre-1939) Neighborhood Stability: High turnover Mobility: Low; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High number of renters • High percentage school aged children • 20% of population without phones; 26% without automobile • 35% without diplomas • All but +65's below poverty level • High unemployment; women not in work force • High number of older teenagers not in school (20%), not in labor force (11%) L� Park Name: Bassett Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 3 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White, but 25% black; 16% hispanic origin I ousehold Characteristics: Families; married couples, but 26% female heads Children: Normal, mostly school age Relative Age: Normal (28) Education: Lower -- 35% without diploma Employment: Normal, but high unemployment Income: Middle Housing: s.f.; owner occupancy; lower value ($34K); older stock (pre 1950) Neighborhood Stability: Fairly unstable Mobility: Fair mobility; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • 10% of population without phone; 17% without automobile • Very few elderly • 1ligh unemployment, especially females (19%) • High percentage of teenagers not in school and unemployed • High percentage of population in every category below poverty level • High percentage with public assistance Park Name: Beck Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 53.03 Race: IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF White (10% black) Ilousehold Characteristics: Families; married couples but many non -families Children: Average school age; high pre-school Relative Age: Normal (32) Education: Slightly higher than nonmal Employment: High percentage in labor force Income: Middle; high social security and retirement percentages Housing: s.f. only 54%; 10+ units/structure 35% (1950-80) Neighborhood Stability: Fair turnover Mobility: High; some disabled • Many non -family households (43%); 16% +65 • High percentage of all parents work • High poverty it! +65 category • High disabilities +65 category Park Name: Bluebell Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 27, 52.01, 53.03 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White (84.1 %) Household Characteristics: High family households due to high married couples Children: Norm Age: Norm (Median Age 31.2) Education: Norm + Employment: Norm Income: Norm (Per Capita $12,762) Housing: Owners. 70% s.f. Neighborhood Stability: Norm Mobility: Good mobility Unusual or Unique Characteristics Low poverty - all groupings 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 f 1 Park Name: Caesar -Donovan Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 20,22 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White 77% (Hispanic origin Tract 20 = 9%) Household Characteristics: Married couples; but high number of female heads of household Children: Slightly less than norm Relative Age: Norm; median 29 Education: Lower; 27% without high school diploma Employment: Low participation in work force; high unemployment Income: Low to middle; 17% below average per capita; 28% poverty Housing: Single family; owner occupied; but 45% renters; man 2-unit multi -family; older stock Neighborhood Stability: Fairly high turnover Mobility: Lower mobility; average number of disableds Unusual or Unioue Characteristics • High unemployment; low participation in work force • High number of older teenagers not in school nor in labor force (10%) • High public assistance; high poverty • 14% without phone; 19% without auto • Two tracts are very different in almost all categories 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Cavanaugh Classification: Community Tract(s): 27, 37, 53.03 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White (83.2 %) Household Characteristics: High family households due to married couples Children: Norm Age: Slightly older (Median Age 32.1) Education: Norm Employment: Normal participation rates Income: Norm Housing: Owner occupied s.f.: 75 % units constucted 1950-1980 Neighborhood Stability: Stable Mobility: Good mobility Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High percentate of parents w/children work • High number of children in school. • Very low in migration of foreign born during 1980's. Park Name: Clifford Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 20,23 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White 80% Household Characteristics: Married couples; but 41% non -family households Children: Norm Relative Age: Norm; median 30 Education: Lower; 25% without high school diploma Employment: Low percentage in labor force; high unemployment Income: Low to middle; 23% poverty Housing: Single family; owner occupied; but 18% 2-4 unit housing; older stock (pre-1950) Neighborhood Stability: Fairly high turnover Mobility: Lower mobility; average number of disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • Tract 23 older, less children • High unemployment and participation • But High percentage of all parents in families with younger children in workforce • High percentage of older teens not in school nor in workforce • 11 % without phone; 17% without car 0 High discrepancies between tracts in many categories Park Name: Classification: Comstock Community Tract(s): 3, 4, 5, 6,7 IlAMMIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: Mixed: Whites 60 %; Black 29 % Household Characteristics: High non -family households due to high singles (32.6 %) Only high family households: single mothers Children: Slightly above norm; tract range 22.8 % to 35.4 % Age: Norm (Median 28.1) Education: Below average; 24.3% no H.S. diploma Employment: Average participation Income: Low: 10 % below average per capita; 29.2 % poverty Housing: More renters than owners; 60% s.f.; many 2-4 units Neighborhood Stability: High turnover Mobility: Lower mobility; average number of disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics 79 % of housing is 1950 or older 1 in 5 no car; 10% w/o phone High number in group quarters High percentage of college students High percentage of foreign born immigrants in 1980's High poverty 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Crego Classification: Community Tract(s): 12, 21, 22, 29.01 Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Relative Age: Education: Employment: Income: Housing: Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF White 79% Families, married (45.8%) Norm Norm; median 30.1 Average; 23.6 no H.S. diploma Average Middle 60% owners; 85% single units; 70% pre-1960 Good stability Good mobility; few disableds Unusual or Unique Characteristics • Pre-primary and college enrollees higher than normal • Stable neighborhoods Park Name: Dunnebacke Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 4, 34 Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Age: Education: Employment: Income: Housing: Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF White 76 % Families; married couples Fewer than average Older (Median 34.0) Above average Average participation in workforce 20 % above average; middle income Single family; owner occupied Very stable High mobility: few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics Large percentage 65+'s (14%) Higher percentage of all parents in workforce More elderly; fewer children Park Name: Durant Classification: Community Tract(s): 2,5,6,7,13,14 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: Mixed; Whites 59 %, Blacks 27 %, Hispanics 12 % Household Characteristics: High non -family households due to high singles (41.1 %) Children: Above average; wide range by tract Age: Young (Median 27.3) Education: Low average Employment: Low participation in work force Income: Low; 39.2 % poverty Housing: Renters 65 %. multi-f. almost 2/3rd's; old stk (pre 1950) Neighborhood Stability: Low stability; above average in migration Mobility: Lower, but few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics Tract 14 single, old, and uneducated (49 % no H.S. diploma) . High number of 65+ householders . Large percentage of older teens not in school or in labor force . High percentage of college students . 1/3 w/o car; 15 % w/o phone . High single mothers (20.1 %) . High 65+ (11.4%) t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 Park Name: Edmore Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 3,7 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: Mixed: White 65 %, Black 23 %, Hispanic 13 % Household Characteristics: Married couples but 24 % female heads of households and 44 % non -family households Children: Above norm Age: Younger (Median 27) Education: Below norm; 29 % no H.S. diploma Employment: Normal participation in work force Income: Low: 27% below average per capita; 38 % poverty Housing: Mixed owner/renter; 54% s.f.; 32% 2-4 units, many older units, low value Neighborhood Stability: Very high turnover Mobility: Low mobility; average number of disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics Unstable neighborhood High percentage of older teens not in school or work force Very low income; high poverty High number of foreign born immigrated during 1980's 12 % w/o phone: 24 % w/o car t 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Elmhurst Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 25,37 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White 83% Household Characteristics: Families with married couples 46.4%; but 12% of households are 65+'s living alone Children: Fewer Relative Age: Older; median 32.8 Education: Norm Employment: Below average participation in labor force Income: Middle income; average to below average poverty Housing: 70% single family; 60% owner occupied (1940-1980) Neighborhood Stability: Above average stability Mobility : Higher; few disableds Unusual or Unique Characteristics • Higher percentage of 65+'s (14%) • High percentage of 65+'s living alone (12%) • Higher numbers of school children; 65% of enrolled • High social security and retirement income Park Name: Everett Classification: Community Tract(s): 23, 26, 27, 28 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White (91.1) Black (4.7) Household Characteristics: Families: Married couples (50.7 %); only 11.5 % female heads of households Children: Below Norm (23.7% of population) Age: Older (Median 33.0) with 13.8 % age 65 + Education: Norm Employment: Norm Income: Above Norm: (Per Capita of $13,703) Housing: 85 % s.f. ; 73 % owners Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: Stable Low mobility limitations Unusual or Unique Characteristics High levels of Social Security income (26%) and retirement income (20 %) in community Only 8.7 % overall poverty Park Name: Fairview Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 9, 10, 65, 31.01 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White (85.1) Black (7.3) Household Characteristics: 50150 Families / Non Families Children: Below norm (21.9 % of population) Age: Norm (Median 30.9) Education: Above norm: more H.S. & college grads Employment: Norm - lower female labor force participation Income: Norm (Per Capita of $12,245) Housing: 60 % s. f. ; 50150 owners/renters: 50 % pre 1940 Neighborhood Stability: Norm Mobility: Low physical limitations Unusual or Unique Characteristics 50 % college students 34 % no car 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 Park Name: Ferris Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 6, 7, 14 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Age: Education: Employment: Income: Housing: Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: White (63.2) Black (24.1) Nonfamilies: Singles (46.2 %) Below Norm (25.2 % of population) Younger - (Median 27.6) Norm - above norm BA's Low labor force participation - men and women Low (Per Capita of $10, 242) 75 % multi-f. w/ 14 % vacancy rate - 61 % pre 1940 const. Low stability Norm mobility limitations: 31 % no car Unusual or Unique Characteristics 17.5 % of 16-19 age group = no school & no job 53 % college students 77% of all foreign born entered U.S. since 1980 39.5 % overall poverty 12.8 % no phone 1 i 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Filley Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 1,32 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White 81%; Hispanic origin 13% Household Characteristics: Married Couples Children: Norm Relative Age: Norm; median 30 Education: Low; 38% without high school diploma Employment: Normal participation except females, especially with young children higher Income: Low to middle; 18% below per capita average; 18% poverty Housing: Single family; owner occupied; lower value and older stock Neighborhood Stability: Very stable; low turnover Mobility: High mobility; but, high number of over 65's with mobility limitations Unusual or Uniaue Characteristics • High percentage of Hispanic origin • High percentage of elementary/high school enrollees (76%) • High percentage of females with young children in labor force • Low income; family high poverty • High percentage of foreign born immigrated in 1980's 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 Park Name: Fine Classification: Community Tract(s): 202.02, 214 Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Relative Age: IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF White 81 % Married couples Older; median 33 Education: Higher; 3.6% with associates degree Employment: High participation in workforce; high percentage of all parents work Income: Middle; 20% above norm per capita Housing: Single family and mobile (10%); owner occupied; mid -age stock (1960-1980) Neighborhood Stability: Stable Mobility: Very mobile; normal number of disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High percentage of elementary/high school enrollees • High percentage of all parents work • Low poverty 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Forest View Classification: Neighborhood Tract: 29.01 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White with 12% blacks Household Characteristics: Families; married couples Children: Few kids Relative Age: Normal Education: Higher; many with BA's and graduate degrees Employment: Normal total percentage in labor force, but high females in Income: Middle Housing: s.f. attached and detached with owner occ.; some 2-4 unit structures (1970-90) Neighborhood Stability: Moderately stable Mobility: High; no disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High number college students -- 46% of enrolled • Pre-primary also high 11 % • High percentage of all parents work 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Forster Community Center Classification: Community Tract(s): 9, 10, 12, 31.01 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White 83% Household Characteristics: Married couples; but 46% non -families with high percentage of singles Children: Below average Relative Age: Norm; median 30.7 Education: Above average; only 18.8% no H.S. diploma; 23% B.A.+ Employment: Slightly above average participation in workforce Income: Middle Housing: 50/50 owner/renter; 75% single units; 75% pre-1960 Neighborhood Stability: Fair Mobility: Good mobility with slightly fewer than average mobility limitations Unusual or Unique Characteristics • Tract 31.01 distorts average (median age of 38 and 24.5% age 65+) and predictably has fewer children (10.2%) • Slightly higher percentage of senior citizens 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 i Park Name: Foster Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s) : 10, 12, 65 IlVIMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White (79.1) Black (11.5) Household Characteristics: Below norm families; above norm non -families Children: Below Norm (26.1 % of population) Age: Norm - (Median 28.4) Education: Norm Employment: Norm - low female labor force participation Income: Low (Per Capita of $10,442) Housing: 71 % s.f.: 50150 owners/renters : 79 % pre 1950 const. Neighborhood Stability: Low stability Mobility: Norm mobility limitations Unusual or Unique Characteristics High college students (45.4 %) High overall poverty (25.4 %) 48.5% of all foreign born entered U.S. since 1980 18 % no car 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Fulton Classification: Community Tract(s): 202.02 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White but high black population (32 %) Household Characteristics: Families; married couples, but very high female h.o.h. Children: Many school age (31 %) Age: Education: Norm Above norm Employment: High percentage in labor force Income: Middle Housing: s.f. = m.f.; owner = renters: most bldg (1960-80) Neighborhood Stability: Fairly high turnover, but very stable base Mobility: Very high; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics High percentage of all parents in labor force Many school age children 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Genesee Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 4, 5, 6 IIVIlVIEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Age: Education: Employment: Income: Housing: Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: White (57.3) Black (33.1) 55 % Families: but 50150 marrieds/singles Norm (29.0 % of population) Norm - (Median 29.1) Norm but above the norm BA's Norm except low female participation Low Norm (Per Capita of $12, 050) Split; s. f. /multi f. w/ 60 % pre 1940 bldgs Norm Above norm mobility limitations 65+ Unusual or Unique Characteristics High % of college students (39.5 %) 33.9 % singles living alone 9.4 % vacant housing Above norm poverty levels - most groupings 20.1 % no car 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Georgetown Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 52.01 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White with 14%v black I lousehold Characteristics: Families; married couples, but 24% female heads Children: High school age Relative Age: Normal (29) Education: Above normal Employment: ' High numbers in labor force Income: Middle Housing: Rentals predominate (50.4%); many s.f. attached and 5-9 unit structures (1950-80) Neighborhood Stability: Stable, but few very long occupancy Mobility: Good; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • More renters than owner occupancy 0 High percentage of all parents work Park Name: Glen Eden Classification: Neighborhood Tract: 29.01 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White with 12% blacks Household Characteristics: Families; married couples Children: Few kids Relative Age: Normal Education: Higher; many with BA's and graduate degrees Employment: Normal total percentage in labor force, but high females in Income: Middle Housing: s.f. attached and detached with owner occ.; some 2-4 unit structures (1970-90) Neighborhood Stability: Moderately stable Mobility: High; no disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High number college students -- 46% of enrolled • Pre-primary also high 11 % • High percentage of all parents work Park Name: Grand Woods (in Eaton County) Classification: Community Tract(s): 33.01, 33.02, 34 Race:, Household Characteristics: Children: Relative Age: IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF White 82% Married couples Norm Older; median 34 Education: Higher; only 15% without high school diploma Employment: Normal participation Income: Middle; per capita income 20% above norm Housing: Single family; owner occupied; mid -range stock (1950-1980) Neighborhood Stability: Very stable Mobility: Very mobile; average number of disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High percentage of elementary/high school enrollees • High percentage of all parents in work force • High percentage of retirement and social security income • Wide range among tracts: Tract 34 median age 37; per capita income $16,00; children 22% Tract 33.01 median age 29; per capita income $11,000; children 31 % Other tracts similar to tract 34 Park Name: Graves Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 51,214 Race: Household Characteristics Children: Relative Age: Education: Employment: Income: Housing: Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF White 82% Married couples Norm Slightly older; median 33 Slightly above norm High percentage in labor force; high percentage of all parents in labor force Middle; per capita plus or minus 15% above norm; low poverty Single family; owner occupied; 11% mobile homes (1960- 1985) Fairly stable High mobility; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High percentage of elementary/high school enrollees (69%) • High percentage of all parents in labor force • Little poverty Park Name: Greencroft Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 20, 23, 24 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White (81.9) Black (11.3) Household Characteristics: Norm: families/married couples Children: Norm (27.7% of population) Age: Norm - (Median 30.4) Education: Norm Employment: Norm Income: Low Norm (Per Capita of $11,463) Housing: 75% s.f. / 76% pre 1950 construction Neighborhood Stability: Norm Mobility: Low norm mobility limitations Unusual or Unique Characteristics 11.7 % of 16-19 age group = no school & no j ob 59 % owner occupied housing 1 a 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 Park Name: Classification: Tract(s): Hillborn Neighborhood 202.02 and 36.01 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: Mixed: white 56%; black 38% Household Characteristics: Families; married couples but 23% female heads of household Children: Larger percentage Relative Age: Norm (29) Education: Above average; no H.S. diploma only 15.9% Employment: High participation in workforce Income: Middle income; only 4% below average poverty Housing: Single family, owner occupied (1950-1980) Neighborhood Stability: Stable Mobility: Good; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High percentage of 65+'s with mobility limitations • High percentage of school age children (<18, 32% of population) Park Name: Hillsdale Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 15, 16 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: Black 69%; White 28% Household Characteristics: Married couples; but 20% female heads of household and 49% of households are non -family Children: Norm Relative Age: Norm; median 31 Education: Lower; 40% without high school diploma Employment: Low participation in workforce; high unemployment Income: Low; 23% below norm per capita Housing: Single family; renters 56%; 10+ units 31 % Neighborhood Stability: Fair stability Mobility: Low to moderate; higher than norm elderly disabilities Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High poverty; especially Tract 15 (51 %) • More elderly (12.4% of population; Tract 16 15%) • 11 % without phone; 32% without car • Higher percentage of college enrollees • Low education • 35% of 65+'s with disability limitations • High percentage of foreign -born immigrated in 1980's • High unemployment • High percentage of all parents in workforce • Discrepancies between tracts especially in income and poverty levels; Tract 15 plus or minus 40% below norm per capital income; Tract 16 about 20% above Park Name: Holly Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 36.02, 37 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: . White 71 %; Black 22% Household Characteristics: Married couples; but 22% female -headed households Children: Higher percentage than normal (30%) Relative Age: Norm; median 30 Education: Lower; 28% without high school diploma Employment: Lower participation in labor force; some unemployment Income: Low to middle; 17% below normal per capita; 25% poverty Housing: Single family with 10% attached; 18% 10+ unit structures; owners 51 %; renters 45 %; medium age stock (1960-1980) Neighborhood Stability: Fairly unstable; fairly high turnover Mobility: Good mobility; higher percentage of 65+'s with mobility limitations nusual or Unioue Characteristics • High percentage of elementary/high school enrollees • Higher male unemployment; plus or minus 4% • High percentage of older teens not in school and neither in labor force or unemployment • Higher poverty; higher public assistance • 17% without car • More children and younger in Tract 36.02 Park Name: Horsebrook Also Sunset Hills, Tecumseh, Wilson Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 33.01, 33.02 Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Relative Age: Education: Employment: Income: Housing: Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: B4MEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF White 76% Married couples Norm Norm 32 Above norm; 14% B.A.'s; 9% graduate degrees Normal participation in workforce Middle income; 16% above norm per capita income Single family; owner occupied; high value (1950-1980) Stable Very mobile; higher number of 16 to 64 mobility limitations Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High percentage of elementary/high school enrollees • Higher percentage all parents in workforce • Tract 33.02 older, more wealth 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 Park Name: Hull Court Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 4,5 Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Age: Education: Employment: Income: Housing: Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: WVIEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF White (56.9 %); Black (34.8 %) Above norm families because of high female head of hsld Above Norm Norm Norm Low/norm labor force' participation Low/norm per capita ($11, 920) Owner occupied s.f.; older w/47% pre 1950 Stable Above norm mobility limitations for 65+ Unusual or Unique Characteristics . High female head of household (20.3 %) . Above norm school age children 58 % of foreign born arrived during 1980's. . 44 % Females not in labor force. . 70 % of children: all parents work . 16 % no cars; 14.5 % w/3 cars or more 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 Park Name: Hunter Classification: Community Tract(s): 10, 12, 13, 21, 65 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White 74 %; Hispanic 11 % Household Characteristics: High non -family hslds due to high singles (32.6 %) Children: Norm Age: Norm (Median 28.3) Education: Low/average; 26.2 % no H.S. diploma Employment: Low participation in work force Income: Low: 10 % below average per capita; 29 % poverty Housing: 50150 owner/renter; 67% s.f.; many older (pre '39) Neighborhood Stability: High turnover Mobility: Poor mobility - slightly above average disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics Tracts 10, 12, and 13, 100 % of children under age 5 living with single mother are in poverty. 1in5nocar High number in group quarters High percentage of college students High percentage of foreign born immigrants in 1980's High poverty Park Name: Ingham Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 36.02, 17.02 ROVIEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: Mixed: White 69 %, Black 25 % Household Characteristics: Married couples but 20 % female heads of households Children: Norm Age: Education: Norm (Median 31) Norm Employment: Normal participation in work force Income: Middle to upper -middle Housing: Single family and mobile homes; 62 % owner occupied; newer stock (1960-1980) Neighborhood Stability: Good stability Mobility: High mobility; large number of 65+'s w/mobility limitations Unusual or Unique Characteristics High percentage of elem/H.S. enrollees High percentage of over 65's w/mobility limitations High percentage of older teens not in school or in work force High number of all parents in work force Significantly older with more wealth in Tract 17.02 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Irving Classification: Neighborhood Tract: 20 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White with 19% black and 12% Hispanic origin Household Characteristics: Families with married couples, but 23% female heads and 43% non -families Children: More and quite young Relative Age: Normal (27) Education: Low Employment: Low percentage in work force; high unemployment Income: Low Housing: Renter 58%; s.f.=m.f. (2 to 4 units predominate); very low value owner occupancy ($29); older stock (pre-1939) Neighborhood Stability: High turnover Mobility: Low; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High number of renters • High percentage school aged children • 20% of population without phones; 26% without automobile • 35% without diplomas • All but +65's below poverty level • High unemployment; women not in work force • High number of older teenagers not in school (20%), not in labor force (11 %) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 Park Name: Jones Lake Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 32 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White with only 8% blacks, but 12.7% hispanic origin Ilousehold Characteristics: Families; married couples Children: higher percentage -- 31 % of population school age Relative Age: Normal (30) Education: Fairly low Employment: Normal, but low percentage of females in labor force Income: Middle Housing: s.f.; owner occupancy; lower value ($37K); older stock (pre 1950); low rents Neighborhood Stability: Stable Mobility: High, some disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • Almost 2x number of children/1,(XX) women • High percentage school age children • Almost 1/3 population without diploma • Over 1/3 population +65's with disability; 25% mobility • Many foreign born with 70% having entered U.S. since 1980 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r i Park Name: Kalamazoo Plaza Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 13, 14, 19 IMOMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White (62.2) Black (23.0) Hispanic (12.1) Household Characteristics: 70 % Non -Families w/ 59.1 % Singles Children: Below Norm (20.3 % of population) Age: Norm - (Median 30.8) with 14% age 65+ Education: Low - 34.1 % no H.S. grad Employment: Very low labor force participation Income: Very low (Per Capita of $7,334) Housing: 85 % multi -family; 7 % owner occupant, assorted construction dates Neighborhood Stability: Low stability Mobility: High mobility limitations: espec. 65 + Unusual or Unique Characteristics High % college students (48.8 %) High overall poverty (51.9 %) 60.8% of all foreign born entered U.S. since 1980 24.8% of 16-19 age group = no school, no job 21.5 % no phone; 44 % no car 1 1 i 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Kaynorth Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 53.04 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White with 23% black I ousehold Characteristics: Families; married couples with 21 % female heads and 40% non family (students) Children: Normal; some college age Relative Age: Younger (28) Education: Slightly higher than normal Employment: High percentage in work force; very high females Income: Low to middle Mousing: High percentage renters; 40% 10+ units (1950-85) Neighborhood Stability: Very high turnover Mobility: High; few disabled Unusual or Unitlur Characteristics • high percentage of all parents work • high poverty in related children under 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Kendon Classification: Community Tract(s): 27, 28, 29.01, 20.02, 53.04 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA . PROFILE BRIEF Race: White (83.6) Household Characteristics: Families: Married couples Children: Below Norm (22.2 % of population) Age: Norm - (Median 30.1) Education: Norm: more college than public school students Employment: High labor force participation - both men and women Income: Above Norm (Per Capita of $13,989) Housing: Split; s.f./multi f. - main construction since 1970 Neighborhood Stability: Low stabililty Mobility: Below norm limitations Unusual or Unique Characteristics High % of college students (50.2 %) Half foreign born into U.S. since 1980 Low(er) poverty levels - all groupings High non-familly households (42.3 %) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Kimberly Classification: Community Tract(s): 4, 5, 6, 14, 15, 19 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White 53%; Black 40%; very mixed by tract Household Characteristics: Non -families 52%; singles 41 %; over 65's 12% Children: Below average number Relative Age Average; median 29.3 Education: Average lower: 27.8% No H.S. diploma but 24.4% BA+ Employment: Low participation in workforce; high unemployment Income: Low to middle; 31.2% poverty Housing: 50/50 single/multi-family; renters 57%; many 10+ units Neighborhood Stability: Low; high turnover Mobility: Lower; higher than average mobility limitations, especially over 65's Unusual or Unioue Characteristics • Very mixed area • Tract 14 (Downtown) is old, single, uneducated and very poor • High unemployment • 27% without cars; 11 % without phones • High percentage of college students • 65+'s with mobility limitations • High percentage of foreign boors arrived in 1980's 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 i t 1 Park Name: Kingsley Classification: Community Tract(s): 4, 6, 15, 16 Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Relative Age: IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Mixed: White 48%; Black 45% Families with married couples; but 48% non -families Norm Norm; median 30.6 Education: Lower; no H.S. diploma 27.2% but B.A.+ 26.9% Employment: Below average participation in work force Income: Low to middle; 27.8 % poverty Housing: 50/50 single/multi; 40% owners; high percentage renters; fairly old stock Neighborhood Stability: Fair stability Mobility: Below average mobility; a number of disableds nusual or Unique Characteristics • Higher percentage on public assistance • 8% without phone; 24% without car • High percentage non -family singles (many 65+) • Black and white almost equal in numbers • Higher percentage of college students • Higher percentage of 65+'s with mobility limitations • Higher percentage of foreign born arriving in last 10 years Park Name: Larch Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 2 g IMMEDIATE U"ACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White (62%) Blk (17%) Hispanics(24.2) Household Characteristics: High family households due to single mothers Children: Above norm Age: Younger. ( Median Age 25.7) Education: Below norm Employment: Low participation in labor force Income: Low (Per Capita $7568) High poverty Housing: 50150 owner / renter. 55 % pre- 1940. Neighborhood Stability: Average Mobility: High age 65+ mobility limitations (26.7%) Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High female head of households (27 %) • High poverty - every grouping 17.5 % no phone / 27.3 % no car Park Name: Lewton Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 17.01, 17.02 Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Relative Age: IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF White 82% Married Couples Fewer; only 21 % of population Older; median 39 Education: Norm; with high percentage of B.A.'s and graduate degrees Employment: Norm; with high percentage of all parents in workforce Income: Middle to high; plus or minus 70% above norm Housing: Single family; owner occupied; with 11 % mobile homes; very high value; new stock Neighborhood Stability: Stable Mobility: Very mobile; few disableds Unusual or Unioue Characteristics • Older population • Large percentage of social security and retirement income • Very high income • Fairly wide discrepancy between tracts; 17.01 much higher income, much older Park Name: Lyons Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 22) 23, 29.01 IXfMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White Household Characteristics: Married couples Children: Fewer than average Age: Older (Median 33.3) Education: Norm: 20% no H.S. diploma: 24% B.A.+ Employment: Average numbers in workforce Income: Middle to low but low poverty (14.7%) Housing: 75% s.f.; 60% owners; older stock (pre-1950) Neighborhood Stability: Fairly stable Mobility: Good: few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics Higher percentage of college students Higher percentage of elderly (14 %) Higher number of self-employed t 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Marscot Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 53.04 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White with 23% black I ousehold Characteristics: Families; married couples with 21 % female heads awl 4017: non - family (students) Children: Normal; some college age Relative Age: Younger (28) Education: Slightly higher than normal Employment: high percentage in work force; very high females Income: Low to middle I Lousing: High percentage renters; 40% 10 t- units 0 950-85) Neighborhood Stability: Very high turnover k1ohility: high; few disabled Un=aLQLLh isluuOjarjj=isjiO • I Iigh percentage of all parents work • High .poverty in related children under 5 Park Name: Marshall Classification: Community Tract(s): 8, 9, 10, 31.01, 65 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Age: Education: Employment: Income: Housing: Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: White (78.6) Blacks (9.7) Hispanic (12.8) Below norm families: married couples (35.2 %) Norm Norm - (Median 29.4) Norm Norm overall - low female participation Below Norm - (Per Capita of $10, 832) - 25 % poverty 65 % s. f., 50 % owners, most bldg pre 1940 Low Norm Norm mobility problems excpt. 32 % no cars Unusual or Unique Characteristics High % of college students (40 %) Low % parents working High poverty - most groupings 32 % no car 33.0 % Single non -family households i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Mc Kinch Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 51, 52.01 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: Norm Household Characteristics: High family households because of single mothers Children: More than norm Age: Slightly younger (Median Age 28.5) Education: Above norm H.S. grads - Below norm college Employment: Above norm labor force participation: all groups Income: Low norm (Per Capita $11,378) Housing: Owner occupied s.f. - 60% built in 60's-80's Neighborhood Stability: Good stability Mobility: Good mobility Unusual or Unique Characteristics High percentage of children in school Low poverty: all groups 93 % multi -car owners Park Name: Miller Road Community Center Classification: Community Tract(s): 53.03, 53.04 RvIMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White 80 % Household Characteristics: Married couples; but 42 % non -family singles Children: Norm Age: Norm (Median 30.0) Education: Above norm; 32 % some college Employment: High percentage in labor force Income: Middle Housing: 54% renters; 48% s.f.; 37% 10+ multi-f. units Neighborhood Stability: High Turnover Mobility: High; average number of disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics High number of all parents in labor force 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Moores Classification: Community Tract(s): 15, 19, 20, 23, 24 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White 73% Household Characteristics: Married couples; but high percentage of non -family especially 65+'s (11 %) Children: Below average number Relative Age: Norm; median age 30.0 Education: Below average; 26% no H.S. diploma Employment: Low participation; high unemployment Income: Low to middle; 25.9% poverty Housing: 50150 owner/renter; 64% single units; older stock (pre-1940) Neighborhood Stability: Above average turnover Mobility: Poorer mobility; slightly more disabilities, especially 65+ Unusual or Unique Characteristics • 11.1 % of older teens not in school and not working • 1 in 5 have no car; 10% without phone • Higher poverty 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r Park Name: Classification: Tract(s): Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Age: Education: Employment: Income: Housing: Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: Munn Neighborhood 29.02, 53.04 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF White (77.5 %) High non -family households Below norm Younger (Median Age 26.3) Excellent - far exceeds norm High labor force participation Above norm ($13,257) 75 % multi -family Not Stable Good mobility Unusual or Unique Characteristics Few senior citizens College students comprise the core of this group 71 % of foreign born entered U.S. since 1980 Park Name: Oak Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 2, 8, 13,65 RVIMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White (67.8) Black (15.4) Hispanic (17.2) Household Characteristics: 55.6 % Families Children: Above Norm (31.0 % of population) Age: Younger (Median 27.1) Education: Below Norm - 31.3% No H.S. grad. Employment: Low labor force participation Income: Low (Per Capita of $8,167) Housing: 51 % s. f.: 35 % owner occupant -older bldgs Neighborhood Stability: Low Stability Mobility: High mobility limitations age 65+ Unusual or Unique Characteristics 33.1 % Singles (largest household category) . 15.2 % no phone . 12.2 % of 16-19 age group = no school & no job . High poverty (37.5 %) 0 28 % no car Park Name: 119TH Armory Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 10,65 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White (82.7%) Household Characteristics: High non -family households Children: Below Norm Age: Norm (Median 29.1) Education: Above norm: few non H.S. grads & 24% college grads. Employment: Normal participation rates. Income: Below Norm. Per Capita Q $11091 Housing: 50150 Renters/ Owners: s.f.many pre 1940 Neighborhood Stability: Average stability Mobility: Norm: good physical mobility, 17 % no car. Unusual or Unique Characteristics High overall poverty (23.4 %) High percentage of college students (47.3 %) Park Name: Ormond Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 9 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White; hispanic origin 9% Ilousehold Characteristics: Families; married couples Children: Fewer Relative Age: Normal (32) Education High Employment: High percentage in labor force Income: Middle Housing: Single family; owner occupancy; older stock (pre 1950) Neighborhood Stability: High turnover but stable base Mobility: high but some disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • high percentage of all parents in labor force • 48% enrolled students college age • 22% of +65's have mobility limitation Park Name: Osborn Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 4 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White with 30% black Ilousehold Characteristics: Families; married couples Children: Normal IRelative Age: Normal (32) Education: High Employment: High percentage in labor force Income: Upper -middle Housing: s.f.; owner occupancy; older stock (pre 1940) Neighborhood Stability: Stable Mobility: I lig h, but some disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • Ifigh percentage +65's with mobility disabilities • High percentage all parents in work force 0 High percentage of social security and retirement income 0 high rents with high percentage of renters paying +35% of income (419c ) Park Name: Pleasant View Classification: Community Tract(s): 36.02, 37, 51 IMMEDIATE I IPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White (68.7%), Black 24.1 % Household Characteristics: High family households due to single mothers Children: Above norm Age: Norm Education: Below norm in H.S. and college graduates Employment: Low participation, esp. females w/ young children Income: Below Norm: higher poverty esp. female householders Housing: Owner occupied, s.f.; older (many 1950's/60's) Neighborhood Stability: Norm Mobility: Above norm mobility limitation for 65 + Unusual or Unique Characteristics Above norm female Head of Households . Very high number school age children . 14.2 % of 16-19 year olds not in school and not working 1 1 1 t 1 1 t I 1 l 1 Park Name: Porter Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 1, 8,9 EMIVIEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White (74.3) Hispanic (18.0) Household Characteristics: Families: married couples Children: Above norm - 31.5 % of pop. Age: Norm - (Median 28.5) Education: Below norm (34.2% No H.S. grad) Employment: Below norm - espec. female participation Income: Below norm - (Per Capita of $9,350) - 25 % poverty Housing: 80% s.f., 57% owners, most bldg pre 1940 Neighborhood Stability: Low norm Mobility: Significant mobility problems - esp. 65 + Unusual or Unique Characteristics High % of school age children Low % parents working 14.6% of 16-19 age group - no school/no job High poverty - most groups 10.4 % no phone / 45.3 % no car ri 1 I 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 Park Name: Poxson Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 23, 27, 28 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White (91.4 %) Household Characteristics: High married couple households Children: Less than norm Age: Older: Median Age (33.5) Education: Above norm: + H.S. grads & - college grads Employment: Normal labor force participation. Income: Above norm per capita ($14,038) Housing: Owner occupied s.f. w/50% built in 40's & 50's Neighborhood Stability: Stable Mobility: Above norm mobility. Unusual or Unique Characteristics High multi -car ownership (52.1 % own 2+ cars) . High transfer payments: 26% receive Soc. Sec.and 22% retirement High percentage of students in private schools Park Name: Quentin Classification: Community Tract(s): 15, 16, 17.01, 24, 25 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: . Mixed: White 68%; Black 29% Household Characteristics: Married couples 43.5%; but 30% non -families; 12% 65+ Children: Fewer Relative Age: Older; median 33.9 Education: Norm Employment: Low participation (because of retirees?) but high percentage of all parents in workforce Income: Wide spread; low to middle; but 20% above average per capita Housing: 62% owners; 73% single family; fairly old stock (pre-1970) Neighborhood Stability: 'High stability Mobility: Good mobility; few disableds Unusual or Unique Characteristics • Higher percentage of elderly; 15% population over 65 • Higher percentage of all parents in workforce • Very stable neighborhood Park Name: Reasoner Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 1,2 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: I White 77%; Hispanic origin 15% Household Characteristics: Families 2-to-1; but 21% female heads of household Children: Norm Relative Age: Slightly younger than average; median age 28.8 Education: Low; 40% without H.S. diploma Employment: Average participation; above average unemployment; blue collar Income: Low to middle; 20+% below average per capita; 24.9% poverty Housing: Single family; owners; older stock; fairly low value Neighborhood Stability: Above average stability; low turnover and little in migration Mobility: Lower; average number of disabled nusual or_UniQue Characteristics • High fertility rate for young women • High number of elementary/high school students • Fewer females in labor force • 9% without phone; 21 % without auto 0 Higher poverty 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 r Park Name: Regent Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 12 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White with 19% black (normal), but 7.640/v Ilispanic origin I lousehold Characteristics: families; married crnrples (36%), but many female heads (21 % ) Children: Abcive average; school age Relative Age: Younger (27) Education: Low -- 14% no diplomas Employment: ' Below average in labor force Income: Low to middle [lousing: Renters = owners; s.f.; old stock (pre 1930-50) Neighborhood Stability: Fairly high turnover N'lobility: Fairly low lhutsuabrll�i-qu CLara-acristio • Almost all categories with high poverty • 1ligh Percentage on public assistance • 14% without telephone; 20% without automobile 0 Moderately high rent with many spending 4-35%o of income Park Name: Reola Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 23,26 RVIMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White (92 %) Household Characteristics: High married couple households and 65+ singles Children: Below Norm Age: Older (Median Age 32.8) Education: Above norm. High graduation rate from H.S & college Employment: Normal participation rates Income: Above norm (Median $13361) Housing: Older s. f. /owner occupied w/60 % 1950 and older Neighborhood Stability: Stable Mobility: Good mobility. Unusual or Unique Characteristics Above norm senior citizens, many living alone High college students (42 %) 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Reutter Classification: Community Tract(s): 6, 13, 14, 15, 19 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: Mixed: White 56.9 %, Black 32 % Household Characteristics: Families only 42 %; high percentage of singles and 65 +'s living alone Children: Norm Age: Norm (Median 28) Education: Below average; 34.4 % no high school diploma Employment: Low participation in work force; high unemployment Income: Low to middle; 30+ % below average; 42 % poverty Housing: 70% renters; 70% multi-f. 11 % vacancies; older stock (pre 1939) Neighborhood Stability: Low; high in migration, 64 % diff nt house 5 yrs prior Mobility: Lower; high no. w/mobility limitations, espec. 65+ Unusual or Unique Characteristics Highly mixed area Tract 14 is 30.6 % age 65+, median age of 54.2 yrs, and 0.5 % children 17 % no phone; 33 % no car High percentage of 65+ with disabilities High number of college students 1980 imigration of foreign born High unemployment High percentage of older teens not in school or in labor force Park Name: Risdale Classification: Community Tract(s): 36.01, 36.02, 37, 51 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White (64.2), Black (28.9) Household Characteristics: Families: married couples and female headed " Children: Higher - 31.8 % of population Age: Norm (Median 29.0) Education: Below norm - 25.2% no H.S. Diploma Employment: Normal participation in Labor Force Income: Lower - (Per Capita of $10,724) Housing: S.f. owners w/almost 1/2 constuction in 60's Neighborhood Stability: Stable Mobility: Significantly higher mobility limitations for 65+ Unusual or Unique Characteristics 13.4% of 16-19 age group on streets w/o work High poverty w/ 65 + and under 5 yrs. 13.8 % no car Park Name: Riverpoint Classification: Community Tract(s): 13, 15, 19, 20, 21 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: I White; Black 30% Household Characteristics: 50/50 family/non-family; 40% singles; high number of female heads of household Children: Above average number Relative Age: Younger; median 27.8 Education: Low; no H.S. diploma 37.4% Employment: Below average participation in labor force Income: Low to middle; 40+% poverty Housing: 63% rentals; older stock (46% pre-1939) Neighborhood Stability: Fairly low stability Mobility: Fairly low; high number of disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • Mixed area; 30% black • High turnover; 61 % lived in different house in 1980 • High percentage of disabled young and old • High percentage of recent immigrants • Very high unemployment • Fairly high poverty • 16% no phone • 30% no automobile Park Name: Riverside Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 17.01, 24 Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Relative Age: Education: Employment: Income: Housing: Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF White 87% Married couples Fewer; 24% of population Older; median 35 Higher; 15% with B.A.'s; 8% with graduate degrees Normal participation; high percentage of all parents in workforce Middle to upper -middle Single family; owner occupied; older stock (pre-1960) Very stable Very mobile; normal number with disabilities Unusual or Uniaue Characteristics • Higher percentage of 65+'s (15%) • Higher percentage of social security and retirement income • Higher income • Older, higher income in tract 17.01 Park Name: St. Joseph Classification: Community Tract(s): 15, 16, 17.01, 4, 35 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: Mixed: White 61 %; Blacks 35% Household Characteristics: Families; married couples; but singles 32.5% Children: Norm Relative Age: Older; median age 33.0 Education: Slightly below norm Employment: Below average participation in labor force Income: Middle; 21% poverty, especially 65+'s (17%) Housing: 65%/35% single/multi-family; 53% owner occupied Neighborhood Stability: Good; mixed in tracts Mobility: Good mobility; some disableds Unusual or Unique Characteristics • Very mixed area Tracts 16 and 17.01 distort averages with median ages of 36.9 and 49.3 respectively. Tract 17.01 has 29.5% age 65+. Tract 15 has 50+% poverty Tract 17.01 housing twice average value • Higher vacancy rate • High number of 65+'s with mobility limitations • High percentage of all parents in labor force Park Name: Seventh Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 1, 31.02 EMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White (89.2) Household Characteristics: Families: married couples Children: Less than norm - 25.1 % of pop. Age: Older - (Median 34.3) Education: Norm+; ie. avg. H.S. grads & + % college Employment: Norm - except higher both parents working Income: Above norm - (Per Capita of $16,272) Housing: S.f. owners w/ most bldg in 50's/60's Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: Above norm Few mobility problems Unusual or Unique Characteristics High % of school age children High % parents working High non -farm self employment 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 Park Name: Stabler Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 12 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White with 19% black (normal), but 7.64% hispanic origin Household Characteristics: Families; married couples (36%), but -many female heads (211% ) Children: Above average; school age Relative Age: Younger (27) Education: Low -- 14% no diplomas Employment: Below average in labor force Income: Low to middle Ilousing: Renters = owners; s.f.; old stock (pre 1930-50) Neighborhood Stability: Fairly high turnover Mobility: Fairly low Unusual or Unique Characterist' • Almost all categories with high poverty • High percentage on public assistance • 14% without telephone; 20% without automobile 0 Moderately high rent with many spending +35% of income Park Name: Stroud Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 22 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White I ousehold Characteristics: Families; married couples, but high percentage +65 live alone Children: Fewer Relative Age: Older (35) Education: High Employment: Normal Income: Housing: Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: Middle s.f.; owner occ.; older (pre 1950) Stable Very high; few disabled I►wual or Unislue Characteristics • 17% of population +65 • 13% of +65's live alone • high percentage of all parents in work force • High percentage pre-primary children 0 High social security and retirement income 0 high self employment 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Horsebrook Also Sunset Hills, Tecumseh, Wilson Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 33.01, 33.02 Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Relative Age: Education: Employment: Income: Housing: Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF White 76% Married couples Norm Norm 32 Above norm; 14% B.A.'s; 9% graduate degrees Normal participation in workforce Middle income; 16% above norm per capita income Single family; owner occupied; high value (1950-1980) Stable Very mobile; higher number of 16 to 64 mobility limitations Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High percentage of elementary/high school enrollees • Higher percentage all parents in workforce • Tract 33.02 older, more wealth 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Sycamore Classification: Community Tract(s): 13, 20, 21, 22, 23 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: Mixed: White 78%; Black 13% Household Characteristics: Families with married couples; but 42% non -family with high percentage of 65+ Children: Average number for population Median Age: Norm (30) Education: Low average; 36% Employment: Participation in workforce low; unemployment high Income: Low to middle: wide range per capita income in tracts; high poverty Housing: Single family; owner occupied; older (pre-1950) Neighborhood Stability: Average; turnover rate normal Mobility: Fairly low; but few disableds Unusual or Unique Characteristics • 1 in 10 without phone; 1 in 5 without car • High number of older teens not in school nor in workforce • Large percentage of single 65+ • High unemployment 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 Park Name: Tammany Classification: Neighborhood Tract: 29.01 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White with 12% blacks Household Characteristics: Families; married couples Children: Few kids Relative Age: Normal Education: Higher; many with BA's and graduate degrees Employment: Normal total percentage in labor force, but high females in Income: Middle Housing: s.f. attached and detached with owner occ.; some 2-4 unit structures (1970-90) Neighborhood Stability: Moderately stable Mobility: High; no disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High number college students -- 46% of enrolled • Pre-primary also high 11% • High percentage of all parents work I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Horsebrook Also Sunset Hills, Tecumseh, Wilson Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 33.01, 33.02 Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Relative Age: Education: Employment: Income: Housing: Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF White 76% Married couples Norm Norm 32 Above norm; 14% B.A.'s; 9% graduate degrees Normal participation in workforce Middle income; 16% above norm per capita income Single family; owner occupied; high value (1950-1980) Stable Very mobile; higher number of 16 to 64 mobility limitations Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High percentage of elementary/high school enrollees • Higher percentage all parents in workforce • Tract 33.02 older, more wealth 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Trager Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 13, 21 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White (64.0) Black (21.7) Hispanic (13.5) Household Characteristics: Below norm families; above norm non -families Children: Norm (29.8 % of population) Age: Norm - (Median 28.2) Education: Below norm; 35.7% no H.S. diploma Employment: Low labor force participation Income: Low (Per Capita of $7,700) Housing: 53 % s.f.: 35 % owner occupant - mixed bldg dates Neighborhood Stability: Low stability Mobility: High physical limitations: all age groups Unusual or Unique Characteristics High proportion of 65+ singles (13.5 %) 13.9 % no phone 15.7% of 16-19 age group = no school & no job 30% no car High transfer payments: 30.9 % receive Soc. Sec. and 28.2 % receive Public Assistance 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Turner Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 2 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White; normal black (19%), but 19% hispanic origin Household Characteristics: Families; married couples, but 280/t, female heads Children: Large percentage under 5 Relative Age: Lower (26) Education: Low Employment: Normal, but lower percentage of females in labor force and high unemployment Income: Low Housing: Renters 54%; m.f. 2-10+ units; owner occupancy; low value ($38K); old stock (pre 1940) Neighborhood Stability: Fairly unstable; fairly high turnover, but a stable base Mobility: Low; few disabled • 34% without diploma • High percentage below poverty level in all categories • High percentage of public assistance income • Almost 1/3 without automobile; 14% without phone • high percentage renters pay +35%v for rent Park Name: Wainwright Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 36.01, 36.02 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White (54.7%), Black (37.6%) Household Characteristics: High family households due to both married couples and single mothers Children: Above Norm Age: Younger (Median age 27.6) Education: Low graduation rates: H.S. & college Employment: Norm+ participation rates Income: Below norm (Per Capita $10,488) Housing: Owners. 85% s.L Neighborhood Stability: Norm Mobility: Many have mobility limitations Unusual or Unique Characteristics Above average poverty levels. Park Name: Waldo Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 27, 28 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Age: Education: Employment: Income: Housing: Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: White (90.1 %) High family households due to married couples Below Norm. Slightly older (Median Age 33.3) Above norm. H.S. grads/ Below norm college Norm Above Norm Per Capita ($14,031) Owner occupied, s.f. w/60% build in 40's and 50"s. Above norm stability Good mobility Unusual or Unique Characteristics High age 65+ High families w/children work Low poverty; all groups Park Name: Walsh Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 21 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White„ with 2 1 % black; 15% Hispanic I-lousehold Characteristics: Families; married couples, but 23% female heads Children: High percentage -- 32% of population Relative Age: Normal Education: Low -- 35% no diploma Employment: Normal, except. low percentage of males in labor force Income: Low to middle Ilousing: s.f.; owner occ.; low value; older stock (pre 1939); fairly high rent with 44% paying +35% of income Neighborhood Stability: High turnover Mobility: Disabled in all age groups Unusual or Unique Characteristics • Hispanic population almost 2x normal • High percentage of pre-primary children • High percentage of income public assistance • Poverty status in almost every age category Park Name: Wentworth Classification: Community Tract(s): 6, 7, 14, 15, 19 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White (54.6) Blacks (36.0) Household Characteristics: Non -Families: 48.1 % live -alone singles Children: Norm Age: Slightly younger - (Median 27.9) Education: Divided: either H.S. dropout or college grad Employment: Low labor force participation - both men and women Income: Low - (Per Capita of $9,338) - 43 % overall poverty Housing: Multi -family rentals: 50 % pre 1940 Neighborhood Stability: Low stabililty Mobility: Significant limitations for 65+ Unusual or Unique Characteristics High % of college students (52.5 %) Low % all parents working High poverty - most groupings 13.4 % no phone: 33 % no car 62.5 % Non -family households LI Park Name: Westside Classification: Community Tract(s): 3, 4, 5, 34, 35 Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Relative Age: Education: Employment: Income: Housing: Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: EW[MEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF White 72% Married couples 43% Norm Norm; median age 31.0 Norm Average number in workforce Middle; slightly higher per capita 60% owners single-family; older stock, 70% pre-1960 Very stable Very mobile; slightly below average mobility limitations for 65+ Unusual or Uniaue Characteristics • Children are 35.4% of population in Tract 5 • High percentage of elementary/high school enrollees • High percentage of foreign borns immigrated in 1980's • High percentage of all parents (especially women) in workforce Park Name: Willoughby Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 53.02, 55.01 IMMEbIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White (95.1 %) Household Characteristics: Married couple families Children: Norm Age: Older (Median Age 33.4) Education: Above norm. Hi % H.S. and college grads Employment: Hi participation in labor force Income: Above norm (Per Capita $15,332) Housing: Owners. 60 % s.f. and 25 % mobile Neighborhood Stability: Norm Mobility: Excellant mobility Unusual or Unique Characteristics Hi % of parents work 1 I T I i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Park Name: Horsebrook Also Sunset Hills, Tecumseh, Wilson Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 33.01, 33.02 Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Relative Age: Education: Employment: Income: Housing: Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF White 76% Married couples Norm Norm 32 Above norm; 14% B.A.'s; 9% graduate degrees Normal participation in workforce Middle income; 16% above norm per capita income Single family; owner occupied; high value (1950-1980) Stable Very mobile; higher number of 16 to 64 mobility limitations Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High percentage of elementary/high school enrollees • Higher percentage all parents in workforce • Tract 33.02 older, more wealth Park Name: Woodcreek Classification: Neighborhood Tract(s): 202.02 IMMEDIATE IMPACT AREA PROFILE BRIEF Race: White but high black population (32%) I lousehold Characteristics: Families; married couples, but very high female heads Children: Many school age (31 %) Relative Age: Normal Education Above normal Employment: High percentage in labor force Income: Middle Ilousing: s.f. = m.f.; owner occ. = renter (1960-80) Neighborhood Stability: Fairly high turnover, but very stable base Mobility: Very high; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • Nigh percentage of all parents in labor force • Many school age children 1 [l Park Maps Areas of Immediate Influence 11 IJ LANSING PARK STUDY LOCATION OF MAPS 1-7 33.01 32' ' i ' ' i 31.02 1 1 � I I 33.02 , . 2 1 • ; 3 1 1 8 --- 5 7 31.01 3 .01 1 1 4 " Lr --------- ------ --�--� ------r-------10 ---- 65 3514 -- -- 1 ; i 16 15 1 12 1 i .• 1 20 -• , 1 i 24 1 1 22 !--- t 17.02 25 ; 23 1 1 26 29.01 44.01 --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- t 37 36.02 _ - _;' 202.02 ; 36.01 27 i t t 28 i ----------------- 1 1 29.02 214 : 1 1 -- 51 53.P4!72.01 53.031 1 1 1 1 i 1 53.02 i t 1 i 52.02 5�.01 �� ' ' JANUARY 1995 n W�167AR� LANSING PARK STUDY PARK AREAS OF IMMEDIATE INFLUENCE PARK PROPERTY & CEMETERY _ SCHOOL PROPERTY N•H SMALL CIRCLE =NEIGHBORHOOD LARGE CIRCLE = COMMUNITY O= CITY WIDE un = CEMETERY 1 OF 7 1 LANSING PARK STUDY PARK AREAS OF IMMEDIATE INFLUENCE 'OWN __lv NORTH SMALL CIRCLE = NEIGHBORHOOD PARK PROPERTY & CEMETERY LARGE CIRCLE = COMMUNITY _ SCHOOL PROPERTY A a CITY WIDE ur. = CEMETERY 20F7 i 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 LANSING PARK STUDY PARK AREAS OF IMMEDIATE INFLUENCE 3 *--GRAND RIVER PARK �e "l w Q cc 0 500 1000 2000 4000 — NORTH *AW Fmcmumm SMALL CIRCLE - NEIGHBORHOOD PARK PROPERTY & CEMETERY LARGE CIRCLE = COMMUNITY _ SCHOOL PROPERTY � CITY WIDE sre =CEMETERY 30F7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LANSING PAR, PARK AREAS OF IMW,-'l R.I.P. 1 PROVINCIAL y UENCE xsx< ix ..�=3Fxa}z�x 4 1140 I FIELD EVERGREEN CEMETERY FOREST A N 44,01 .............. 0 SW 1000 2000 4000 X :... NORTH IANUMPARU SMALL CIRCLE = NEIGHBORHOOD PARK PROPERTY & CEMETERY LARGE CIRCLE = COMMUNITY ............ OwNf�CITY WIDE CEMETERY SCHOOL PROPERTY 40F7 LANSING PARI PARK AREAS OF IMMEC 0 5 1000 2000 4000 it NORTH SMALL CIRCLE =NEIGHBORHOOD ' PARK PROPERTY & CEMETERY LARGE CIRCLE = COMMUNITY _ SCHOOL PROPERTY A = CITY WIDE ua = CEMETERY 50F7 LANSING PARK STUDY � PARK AREAS OF IMMEDIATE INFLUENCE ON q` '✓rJ" ;y; c�� y. :;wjn wr:�;vsK?'„�5, �;�:`�'� n4 ✓ }'� � ��/�`.`!� ��3'i+.Ly �+/ lY• >v } '� { v wvv ham: �:aJ _ .•�t' �„ � mm` yi .n ?+�: ".�f>tn: �°arf1J'Jli. �ti.�.tti �44�n,r.� M \�\:: ^•' c�;. � F°F i!�o' ;v�` • :, ;4„ . < r� i n �'. �• :?r � °a� �r. ' /f "\ a{ \\ �\ J�+�l! f/�•/j c:.>''/, �° 3 < t J 4 w � <r } J J '.,. l � o {•h\4 4 - \ h4•.1+y..4 I3 �% '`� ' " '. �t !J ., = iiz2 j r.Z AURV .,`• 3,��4s, h4�7+ �-3^`?r��' <Tkfr2r>!"N", 211� �' l PLEASANT V .' �l`vr^\•'v :�1.•�\''x v"'~ ( .x1 \•�4' ~ _ .vim : l ":5 :: �F' x x: '`v:':, •i'.:; ¢p (.l • �t;i•3' . 15. JOLLY� `,`� "h`t•'"'• h. !��•4>., n,4. :. . .:.... ... ..... .J.., .. Fr. .Y.{°% ' ., }!r� ..• .: �: e��. �f. WEXFOR �`w �" »:: cir'�•'r a'v: �"/.�n' �'.+'iC!!'r::+ti.,r,,:C•`fC � xr^b°2 £ VIOLA w'�w�„M _.M„„.." a `R?;'v.' y. �:'. ,r�,.:;;'a:. yy: 'do i ..�• ...vw.w. ::::,,:.,x�; 3WANEE � :y;.+ ..:.aJ +,j '� Jn�N µ .: •< of � Y PENROSE DAVIS {�t Fr' c <Js, j4f�r °� Jc v" n xt mow„ w,, � � ,.£2 t.:.•. J<:.. . Si'•• HILL ;GRAVES\•<1. ` s.<,`< `•`•:: A7W000 FRANKS !t` :i£N,• ` ATWOOD ti ^ MILLER GUK R f filar :':' �:nn"n'n-: ti�4 L.�:r h •'..�•'i::' " E�7,tSty t't:'. v``ji••-.i�2 ` .w:w• �1 ..: :. . Y,�t%:v'4 ,+if ` :y, v'w..:.•iivn ��' _-_-_-_-_--- xtyy'••v,.l'::.,. v}n:."J'!, xx'M �v.,:,• .., 100 -'• 1,�''4��.,_,`*,�..`.,. "',,. EDGEWOOD Z j 3 52,02 0 500 1000 2= NORTH SMALL CIRCLE = NEIGHBORH D PARK PROPERTY & CEMETERY LARGE CIRCLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL PROPERTY A s CITY WIDE = OEM RY W EGER PARCEL 8 VGH jY .01 I • ------j 6 OF 7 C 1 I RD. ENTER LANSING PARK STUDY PARK AREAS OF IMMEDIATE INFLUENCE--"•' I � 1 BEEKMAN CENTER ' w 1 \TT ,Ltiw 4�r • ': 232> • NAUGH DUNKEL `.�IRENE ?rt:��J, £s{f•s•< woad ':t, I MUNN s` JO tu G,VNO TH:; {{ N r� r fn:y r• KEYSTONE fi �•1 ..... I-L ftft.-ft. V W RXP••ty .+.. E .•✓;rf-ir,yam.,::.^.'^,•`',','1`.,"�vo- •� • NQ,RTf3 s {a, :....,.%, •� :: }�} r f rrr :'`'��, W � •MAI30NETi�.`v.4 � . MARS • F 1 ;: •..:. v"mow AM MAN BOTH N NO 2 J Lu JUST AssM NT N Q cc ('1 Q g w 0 o soo i000 200o a000LAMMOPAM Z _ NORTH ' SMALL CIRCLE = NEIGHBORHOOD ' PARK PROPERTY & CEMETERY LARGE CIRCLE- COMMUNITY _ SCHOOL PROPERTY A . CITY WIDE CEMETERY 70F7 1 Ll City of Lansing 1990 Census Statistics I 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CITY OF LANSING PARK STUDY City of Lansing Base Demographic Data LANSING TOTALS POPULATION: MALE 60351 47.4 FEMALE 66970 52.6 127321 100.0 AGE UNDER 5 11702 9.2 5 TO 17 23212 18.2 18 TO 20 5712 4.5 21 TO 24 9940 7.8 25 TO 44 45521 35.8 45 TO 54 10437 8.2 55 TO 59 4359 3.4 60 TO 64 4268 3.4 65 TO 74 7088 5.6 75 TO 84 3878 3.0 85 PLUS 1205 0.9 TOTAL 127322 100.0 MEDIAN AGE 29.7 UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE 34912 % OF TOTAL POPULATION 27.4 AGE 65 OR OLDER 12171 % OF TOTAL POPULATION 9.6 HOUSEHOLDS: TOTAL FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS MARRIED COUPLE HSLDS MALE HEAD OF HSLD FEMALE HEAD OF HSLD NONFAMILY HOUSEHOLDS HOUSEHOLDER LIVES ALONE HOUSEHOLDER 65+ PERSONS LIVING IN HOUSEHOLDS PERSONS/HOUSEHOLD GROUP QUARTERS TOTAL LIVING IN GROUP QTRS INSTITUTIONALIZED OTHERS RACE: WHITE BLACK AMER. INDIAN./ALEUT ASIAN OTHER RACE TOTAL % HISPANIC ORIGIN LANSING CITY $ 50635 31428 62.1 21270 42.0 1761 3.5 8397 16.6 19207 37.9 14740 29.1 4264 8.4 126428 2.5 893 582 311 94135 73.9 23626 18.6 1295 1.0 2263 1.8 6002 4.7 100.0 10112 7.9 Lansing Park Study 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TOTAL HOUSING UNITS: TOTAL OCCUPIED TOTAL VACANT OWNER OCCUPIED RENTER OCCUPIED OWNER VACANCY RATE RENTAL VACANCY PERSONS PER OWNER UNIT PERSONS PER RENTAL UNIT UNITS W/OVER 1 PERSON/ROOM LIVING UNITS IN STRUCTURE 1 UNIT DETACHED 1 UNIT ATTACHED 2 TO 4 UNITS 5 TO 9 UNITS 10 PLUS UNITS MOBILE VALUE OF HOUSING STOCK OWNER OCCUPIED MEDIAN VALUE MEDIAN RENT OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY RACE WHITE BLACK AMER IND/ALEUT ASIAN/PACIFIC ISLAND OTHER RACE HISPANIC (ANY RACE) TOTAL UNITS URBAN V. RURAL POPULATION URBAN POP - RURAL TOTAL LANSING CITY 53919 50635 93.9 3284 6.1 27737 51.4 22898 42.5 1.5 6.8 2.64 2.33 1731 3.4 32979 61.2 3023 5.6 5639 10.5 2369 4.4 8481 15.7 1428 2.6 100.0 48400 356 39902 78.8 8104 16.0 411 0.8 547 1.1 1671 3.3 2812 ------------------ 50635 100.0 127321 0 127321 Lansing Park Study �3 �J 1 1 1 LANSING CITY SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 3 YRS + AND IN SCHOOL 37857 100.0 PREPRIMARY 2618 6.9 ELEM / HIGH 22119 58.4 IN PRIVATE ELM/HIGH 9.6 COLLEGE 13120 34.7 EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT (25+) TOTAL POP AGE 25 OR OLDER 77268 100.0 LESS THAN 9TH GRADE EDUC. 5235 6.8 19 - 12 GRADE W/O DIPLOMA 11521 14.9 TOTAL W/O H.S. DIPLOMA ------------------ 16756 21.7 HS GRAD 19998 25.9 SOME COLLEGE 20289 26.3 ASSOC. DEG. 6066 7.9 BACHELOR'S 9318 12.1 GRAD -PROF DRGEE 4841 6.3 FIVE (5) YEAR MOBILITY STUDY TOTAL POP AGE 5 AND OLDER 115656 100.0 LIVED IN SAME HOUSE 55709 48.2 LIVED IN DIFF HOUSE IN U.S. 58655 50.7 SAME STATE 50781 43.9 SAME COUNTY 37156 32.1 DIFFERENT COUNTY 13625 11.8 DIFFERENT STATE 7874 6.8 LIVED ABROAD 1292 1.1 DISABILITY SECTION: CIVILIAN NONINSTITUTIONALIZED PERSONS PERSONS AGES 16 TO 64 82712 -WITH A MOBILITY OR SELF CARE LIMITATION 4571 5.5 - MOBILITY 2051 2.5 - SELF CARE 3409 4.1 - WITH A WORK DISABILITY 8837 10.7 - IN THE LABOR FORCE 4021 4.9 - PREVENTED FROM WORKING 3950 4.8 PERSONS 65 YRS AND OLDER 11914 W/ LIMITATION 2735 23.0 MOBILITY LIMITATION 2157 18.1 SELF -CARE LIMITATION 1581 13.3 ILansing Park Study 4 LANSING CITY % CHILDREN BORN PER 1,000 WOMEN WOMEN 15 TO 24 441 WOMEN 25 TO 34 1320 WOMEN 35 TO 44 1951 VETERAN STATUS CIVILIAN VETERAN AGE 16+ 11972 65 YEARS AND OVER 2739 PLACE OF BIRTH BORN IN U.S.A. 123322 96.9 BORN IN MICHIGAN(%) 75.9 FOREIGN BORN 3999 3.1 ENTERED U.S. 1980-90 1648 41.2 i 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 I Lansing Park Study 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 LANSING CITY % TOTAL LABOR FORCE STATUS PERSONS 16 AND OVER 95498 11 IN LABOR FORCE 65884 69.0 CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE 65611 UNEMPLOYED 5522 8.4 ARMED FORCES 273 NOT IN LABOR FORCE 29614 31.0 MALE LABOR FORCE STATUS TOTAL MALES AGE 16+ 44304 IN LABOR FORCE 34508 77.9 CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE 34277 UNEMPLOYED 3186 9.3 ARMED FORCES 231 NOT IN LABOR FORCE 9796 22.1 FEMALE LABOR FORCE STATUS TOTAL FEMALES AGE 16+ 51194 IN LABOR FORCE 31376 61.3 CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE 31334 UNEMPLOYED 2336 7.5 ARMED FORCES 42 NOT IN LABOR FORCE 19818 38.7 WITH OWN CHILDREN < 6YRS 9432 18.4 IN LABOR FORCE 60.3 % AS NUMBER 5687 W/ OWN CHLDRN 6 TO 17YRS 7572 14.8 IN LABOR FORCE 75.3 AS NUMBER 5702 OWN CHILDREN UNDER 6 YRS IN FAMILIES & SUBFAMILIES 13386 ALL PARENTS IN LBR FCE 7658 57.2 OWN CHILDREN 6 TO 17 YEARS IN FAMILIES & SUBFAMILIES 20368 ALL PARENTS IN LBR FCE 13733 67.4 ALL PERSONS 16 - 19 YEARS 6617 NOT IN SCHL-NOT H.S. GRAD 919 13.9 EMPLYD OR ARMED FORCES 371 5.6 UNEMPLOYED 136 2.1 NOT IN LABOR FORCE 412 6.2 Lansing Park Study 0 LANSING CITY % COMMUTING TO WORK SURVEY POPULATION % DROVE ALONE 58801 77.3 % IN CARPOOLS 12.4 % PUBLIC TRANSIT 3 % USING OTHER MEANS 0.8 % WALKED/WORKED HOME 6.2 MEAN TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) 17.3 EMPLOYED PERSONS AGE 16+ 60089 OCCUPATION ' EXECUTIVE AND MGMT 6689 11.1 PROFESSIONAL SPECIALTY 7613 12.7 TECHNICIANS AND RELATED 2428 4.0 SALES 6513 10.8 ' ADMIN SUPPORT/CLERICAL 11718 19.5 PRIVATE HSLD OCCUP. 235 0.4 PROTECTIVE SERVICES 1255 2.1 SERVICE (EX PROTECT+HSLD) 8656 14.4 FARM/FOREST/FISH 568 0.9 PRECISION PROD/CRAFT/REPAIR 5531 9.2 MACH OPS, INSPECT, ASSEMBLE 4268 7.1 TRANSPORT, MAT'L MOVING 2234 3.7 HANDLERS, HELPERS, LABORERS 2381 4.0 100.0 INDUSTRY EMPLOYED PERSONS AGE 16YRS + 60089 AGRICULTURE, FOREST, FISHERIES 657 1.1 MINING 48 0.1 CONSTRUCTION 2630 4.4 MFG. (NON -DURABLE) 1705 2.8 ' MFG (DURABLE) 6972 11.6 TRANSPORTATION 1806 3.0 COMMUNICATIONS /PUBLIC UTIL 1496 2.5 ' WHOLESALE TRADE 1834 3.1 RETAIL TRADE 11448 19.1 FINANCE/INS.,/REAL ESTATE 3782 6.3 BUSINESS AND REPAIR SERVICES 3239 5.4 PERSONAL SERVICES 1887 3.1 ENTERTAINMENT/REC. SERVICES 744 1.2 HEALTH SERVICES 4598 7.7 EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 6028 10.0 OTHER PROFESSIONAL/RELATED 4358 7.3 _ PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION 6857 11.4 100.0 ' Lansing Park Study v7 1 LANSING CITY % CLASS OF WORKER EMPLOYED PERSONS AGE 16+ 60089 PRIVATE WAGE AND SALARY 43960 73.2 GOVERNMENT (TOTAL) 13347 22.2 LOCAL GOVT 4204 7.0 1 STATE GOVT 8123 13.5 FEDERAL GOVT 1020 1.7 ' SELF-EMPLOYED UNPAID FAMILY WORKERS 2649 133 4.4 0.2 100.0 INCOME IN 1989 HOUSEHOLDS 50835 100.0 LESS THAN $5000 3971 7.8 5000 TO 9999 5553 10.9 10000 TO 14999 4905 9.6 15000 TO 24999 9582 18.8 25000 TO 34999 8775 17.3 35000 TO 49999 50000 TO 74999 9643 6270 19.0 12.3 75000 TO 99999 1504 3.0 100000 TO 149999 538 1.1 150000 OR MORE 94 0.2 MED. HSLD Y ($) 26398 FAMILIES 31698 100.0 LESS THAN $5000 2011 6.3 5000 TO 9999 2837 9.0 10000 TO 14999 2295 7.2 1 15000 TO 24999 5227 16.5 25000 TO 34999 5321 16.8 35000 TO 49999 7165 22.6 50000 TO 74999 5018 15.8 75000 TO 99999 1298 4.1 100000 TO 149999 441 1.4 ' 150000 OR MORE MED. FAM Y ($) 85 31576 0.3 NONFAMILY HSEHLDS 19137 100.0 ' LESS THAN $5000 2220 11.6 5000 TO 9999 2952 15.4 10000 TO 14999 2586 13.5 15000 TO 24999 4412 23.1 25000 TO 34999 3394 17.7 35000 TO 49999 2328 12.2 50000 TO 74999 75000 TO 99999 993 165 5.2 0.9 100000 TO 149999 78 0.4 150000 OR MORE 9 0.0 MED. N.F.Y ($) 18619 ' PER CAPITA INCOME ($) 12232 Lansing Park Study 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TYPES OF INCOME HOUSEHOLDS W/WAGE OR SALARY INCOME MEAN WAGE/SALARY Y ($) W/NONFARM SELF EMPLYMT Y MEAN NONFARM SELF EMP Y ($) W/FARM SELF EMPLYMNT Y MEAN FARM SELF EMPY Y ($) W/SOCIAL SECURITY INCOME MEAN SOC. SEC. Y ($) W/PUBLIC ASSISTANCE INCOME MEAN PUBLIC ASST. Y ($) W/RETIREMENT Y MEAN RETIREMENT Y ($) POVERTY STATUS IN 1989 PERSONS FOR WHOM POVERTY STATUS DETERMINED ........ BELOW POVERTY LEVEL PERSONS 18 AND OVER - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL PERSONS 65 AND OVER - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL RELATED CHILDREN UNDER 18 - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL RELATED CHILDREN UNDER 5 - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL RELATED CHILDREN 5 TO 17 - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL UNRELATED INDIVIDUALS - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL ALL FAMILIES - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL W/RELATED CHILDREN UNDER 18 - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL RELATED CHILDREN UNDER 5 - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL FEMALE HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL W/RELATED CHILDREN UNDER 18 - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL RELATED CHILDREN UNDER 5 - BELOW POVERTY LEVEL Lansing Park Study LANSING CITY 50835 39730 78.2 31084 4564 9.0 9392 243 0.5 1838 10557 20.8 7789 6622 13.0 4673 7682 15.1 8055 126164 24513 19.4 91600 14649 16.0 11914 1359 11.4 34323 9641 28.1 11462 3535 30.8 22861 6106 26.7 27190 7004 25.8 31698 5239 16.5 18151 4569 25.2 9108 2722 29.9 8281 3555 42.9 6191 3293 53.2 2933 1935 66.0 0 HOUSING: - TOTAL HOUSING UNITS YEAR BUILT '1989-1990 '1985-1988 '1980-1984 '1970-1979 '1960-1969 '1950-1959 '1940-1949 11939 AN EARLIER NUMBER BEDROOMS '- 0 '- 1 '- 2 '- 3 '- 4 '- 5 OR MORE SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS - LACKS COMPLETE PLUMBING - LACKS COMPLETE KITCHEN - CONDOMINIUM HOUSING UNITS SOURCE OF WATER -PUBLIC SYSTEM / PRIVATE CO. -INDIVIDUAL WELL -INDIVIDUAL DUG WELL -OTHER SEWER - PUBLIC - SEPTIC/CESSPOOL - OTHER LANSING CITY 53919 426 0.8 1825 3.4 2706 5.0 8492 15.7 10632 19.7 8804 16.3 6544 12.1 14490 26.9 100.0 1068 2.0 9166 17.0 17808 33.0 19529 36.2 5527 10.3 821 1.5 53919 100.0 175 0.3 241 0.4 829 1.5 53756 99.7 156 0.3 7 0.0 0 0.0 100.0 53531 99.3 318 0.6 70 0.1 Lansing Park Study 10 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS: YEAR MOVED INTO HOUSE/APT 1989-1990 1985-1988 1980-1984 1970-1979 1960-1969 1959 AND EARLIER NO TELEPHONE IN HOUSE CARS/ OCCUPIED HOUSING UNIT 0 1 2 3 OR MORE Lansing Park Study LANSING CITY 50635 93.9 13252 26.2 15102 29.8 6601 13.0 7446 14.7 4059 8.0 4175 8.2 100.0 2890 5.7 6752 13.3 20756 41.0 17408 34.4 5719 11.3 100.0 11 1 1 rl 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS - OWNER OCCUPIED UNITS - WITH MORTGAGE - W/O MORTGAGE MONTHLY COSTS W/MORTGAGE - LESS THAN 300 - 300-499 - 500-699 - 700-999 - 1000-1499 - 1500-1999 - 2000 OR MORE MEDIAN (DOLLARS) MONTHLY COSTS W/O MORTGAGE - LESS THAN 100 - 100-199 - 200-299 - 300-399 - 400 OR MORE MEDIAN (DOLLARS) SELECTED OWNER COSTS AS OF 1989 HOUSEHOLD INCOME - LESS THAN 20% - 20 - 24% - 25 - 29% - 30 - 34% - 35 % OR MORE - NOT COMPUTED GROSS RENTS OCCUPIED RENTAL UNITS - LESS THAN $200 - $200 - 299 - $300 - 499 - $500 - 749 - $750 - 999 - $1000 OR MORE - NO CASH RENT MEDIAN (DOLLARS) GROSS RENT AS % OF 1989 HOUSEHOLD INCOME -LESS THAN 20 % - 20 TO 24 % - 25 TO 29 % - 30 TO 34 % - 35 % OR MORE - NOT COMPUTED LANSING CITY % 25429 17076 67.2 8353 32.8 100.0 461 2.7 5295 31.0 6212 36.4 4131 24.2 863 5.1 92 0.5 22 0.1 584 116 1.4 2373 28.4 4205 50.3 1130 13.5 529 6.3 236 8353 15577 61.3 3615 14.2 2353 9.3 895 3.5 2853 11.2 136 0.5 25429 100.0 22700 100.0 1966 8.7 2436 10.7 12669 55.8 4872 21.5 328 1.4 22 0.1 407 1.8 399 7032 31.0 2951 13.0 2398 10.6 1548 6.8 7800 34.4 971 4.3 22700 100.0 ILansing Park Study 12 po City of Lansing 1990 Census Tract Profile Briefs 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 i I I R CITY OF LANSING 1990 CENSUS TRACT LISTING 1 28 2 29.01 3 29.02 4 31.01 5 31.02 6 32 7 33.01 8 _33.02 9 34 10 35 12 36.01 13 36.02 14 37 15 38.01 16 40 17.01 44.01 17.02 51 19 52.01 20 52.02 21 53.02 22 53.03 23 53.04 24 55.01 25 65 26 202.02 27 214.00 1 Tract I Race: White with only 4% black, but 12% Hispanic origin Household Characteristics: Families; married couples Children: Normal; plethora of school age Relative Age: Normal (30) Education: Low Employment: Normal exp. low percentage of females in work force Income: Low to middle Housing: s.f.; owner occupancy; lower value ($34K); older stock (pre 1940) Neighborhood Stability: Stable Mobility: High; some disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • 44% of population without diploma • High percentage of renters pay +35% income for rent • Very high percentage of school age children (77%) wchC:\WP VM6MWPDOCSMANULTOMPRO"US.WPD Tract 2 Race: White; normal black (19%), but 19% Hispanic origin Household Characteristics: Families; married couples, but 28% female heads Children: Large percentage under 5 Relative Age: Lower (26) Education: Low Employment: Normal, but lower percentage of females in labor force and high unemployment Income: Low Housing: Renters 54%; m.f. 2-10+ units; owner occupancy; low value ($38K); old stock (pre 1940) Neighborhood Stability: Fairly unstable; fairly high turnover, but a stable base Mobility: Low; few disabled • 34% without diploma • High percentage below poverty level in all categories • High percentage of public assistance income • Almost 1/3 without automobile; 14% without phone • High percentage renters pay +35% for rent Qd%CAVVPW W6MNVPDOC,SVUNULTON\PROFR.FS.WPD Tract 3 Race: White, but 25% black; 16% Hispanic origin Household Characteristics: Families; married couples, but 26% female heads Children: Normal, mostly school age Relative Age: Normal (28) Education: Lower -- 35% without diploma Employment: Normal, but high unemployment Income: Middle Housing: s.f.; owner occupancy; lower value ($34K); older stock (pre 1950) Neighborhood Stability: Fairly unstable Mobility: Fair mobility; few disabled • 10% of population without phone; 17% without automobile • Very few elderly • High unemployment, especially females (19%) • High percentage of teenagers not in school and unemployed • High percentage of population in every category below poverty level • High percentage with public assistance "C:%WPVVIN6 IWPDOCSUU?A LTOMPROF LES.WPD f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 Tract 4 Race: White with 30% black Household Characteristics: Families; married couples Children: Relative Age: Normal Normal (32) Education: High Employment: High percentage in labor force Income: Upper -middle Housing: s.f.; owner occupancy; older stock (pre 1940) Neighborhood Stability: Stable Mobility: High, but some disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High percentage +65's with mobility disabilities • High percentage all parents in work force • High percentage of social security and retirement income • High rents with high percentage of renters paying +35% of income (41%) rd\C:\WP WW60RWPDOCSUUMILTONWROFII.E&WM Tract 5 Race: Mixed: 44% white; 43% black; 13% Hispanic origin Household Characteristics: Families with married couples but 28% female heads and 32% non - families Children: High percentage: 35% of population under 18 Relative Age: Younger (26) Education Low; 29% without diploma Employment: Low percentage in work force, especially females, only 46% Income: Low to middle; high percentage below poverty level Housing: Single-family; owner occupancy; +2-4 unit (17%) older stock (pre 1950) Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: Stable Fairly low; some disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High percentage of non -families with householders living alone (22.7%) • High percentage of housing units with over one person/room (9%) • High percentage public assistance income (23%) • Low education -- 29% with diploma • 20% of mortgages more than 35% of income; 64% of rent more than 35% • Lots of school age children • Many new foreign born arrivals (73% 1980-90) • 13% of population without phones; 25% without automobiles wchC:\WPW NMWPDOC.SUUNULTONUPROF zs.WPD Tract 6 Race: Mixed; 58 % white, 29 % black, 7 % Asian, 7.8 % Hispanic origin Household Characteristics: Non -families 67% with 51 % living alone Children: Fewer young; only 23 % < 18 years Relative Age: Normal Education: High Employment: Normal but almost no families with all parents in work force Income: Low income Housing: Renters 70%; 2-4 units 38%; 10+ 29%; older stock Neighborhood Stability: High turnover Mobility: fair; few disabled • 67 % non -family households (college students 64 % of enrolled) • High percentage foreign born (7%) and recently entered U.S. (76%) • High percentage of older teenagers not in school and not employed (21 %) • Poverty in all categories except elderly (+65) • 11 % without phones; 26 % without automobile i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tract 7 Race: White with 21% black, 5% Asian, 10% Hispanic origin Household Characteristics: Non -family 54%; live alone; 22% of families with female heads Children: Normal, but higher percentage of very young Relative Age: Younger (26) Education: Normal Employment: Low percentage in work force; high unemployment Income: Very low; per cap. $8961 Housing: Renters 65%; 2-4 units and single-family; high vacancy rate; old block (pre 1950) Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: Very high turnover Fair; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High percentage of foreign born arrived 1980-90 • High unemployment • High percentage of population below poverty level in all categories • 13% without phones; 30% without automobile wchC:%W PWIN6M W PDOCSOANU LTONIPROFILBS. W PD 0 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r Tract _8 Race: White with 16% black; 26% of Hispanic origin Household Characteristics: Families; married couples, but 27% female heads Children: Plethora; 38% of population <18 years Relative Age: Younger 25.5 Education : Low Employment: Low percentage in labor force, especially women Income: Low Housing: Renters = owner occupancy; single-family and 2-4 units; low value owner occupancy ($30K); older stock (pre 1940) Neighborhood Stability: High turnover Mobility: Fairly low; some disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High poverty in every category especially +65 • Lots of kids -- 77% enrolled in elementary -high school • 19% without phones; 25% without car • 42% without diploma • Some immigration from out of state • 3 1 % of population +65 have mobility limitation • High number of children/1000 women • High percentage with public assistance income • High percentage of population paying +35% of income for rent sr&C:\WP V M6MWMOCSUUIMLTON�YROnIM.WPD Tract 9 Race: White; Hispanic origin 9% Household Characteristics: Families; married couples Children: Relative Age: Education Fewer Normal (32) High Employment: High percentage in labor force Income: Middle Housing: Single family; owner occupancy; older stock (pre 1950) Neighborhood Stability: High turnover but stable base Mobility: High but some disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High percentage of all parents in labor force • 48% enrolled students college age • 22% of +65's have mobility limitation Qd1C:\W7WII MV PDOCSOAMILTOMMOFUM.WM Tract 10 Race: White Household Characteristics: Families, but non -families 47% Children: Few children; some college age Relative Age: 30 Education: Slightly above normal Employment: High percentage in labor force Income: Low to middle Housing: s.f.; owner occ.; old stock (pre 1950) Neighborhood Stability: Fairly regular turnover Mobility: High; few disabled Unusual_ or Unique Characteristic • College students 52% of enrolled • High percentage self-employed ad%C.XWP WIN6MWPDOCSUUbULTONWROFIL6S. WPD Tract 12 Race: White with 19% black (normal), but 7.64% Hispanic origin Household Characteristics: Families; married couples (36%), but many female heads (21 %) Children: Above average; school age Relative Age: Younger (27) Education: Low -- 14% no diplomas Employment: Below average in labor force Income: Low to middle Housing: Renters = owners; s.f.; old stock (pre 1930-50) Neighborhood Stability: Fairly high turnover Mobility: Fairly low Unusual or Unique Characteristics • Almost all categories with high poverty • High percentage on public assistance • 14% without telephone; 20% without automobile • Moderately high rent with many spending +35% of income ad1C:\WP1 VU"M WPDOCSVUNULTOWIPROFU,ES. WPD Tract 13 Race: White, with 23 % black and 9 % Asian; 14 % Hispanic Household Characteristics: Non -family -- live alone and over 65 high percentage Children: Relative Age: High school age Education: Low--36 % no diploma Employment: Low percentage in labor force; high unemployment Income: Low Housing: . Renters; m.f. 2-10+ units 50% (1960-90) Neighborhood Stability: Very high turnover Mobility: Low; a number of disabled TTmusnal or Unique rharacteristics • Very low value housing stock and rents • Low rent yet large percentage spend above 35 % of income • Disabled both under 64 and over 65 • Many older teenagers not in school and not employed (63 %) • 18 % with no phone; 46 % with no automobile (many walkers) • High poverty in every category 0 High public assistance, social security and retirement income Tract 14 Race: White with 22 % black Household Characteristics: Non -family; live alone and over 65 Children: Almost none -- 0.5 % Relative Age: Older -- 54 Education: Employment: Low percentage in labor force Income: Very low -- 58 % less than $5K Housing: 94 renters; 43 % 10+ units Neighborhood Stability: Fairly stable base but high turnover Mobility: Low; many disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • 31 % of population over 65 • High percentage of live-alones over 65; 102 out of 196 in group quarters • 25 % without phones; 78 % wihtout automobile • All students enrolled are college students; no youngsters • Per capita income $5761 9 High percentage of social security; retirement and public assistance income 1 1 Tract 15 Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Relative Age: Education: Black with white 32 % Non -families; 57 % white with 20 % of families headed by females Normal Normal (28) Low Employment: Low percentage of population in labor force; high unemployment Income: Low; per capita income $6763 Housing: Renters (72%) 2/3's m.f. with 10+ units predominates; mixed stock --old and new Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: Very high turnover Low; number of disabled Unusual or Unique Chararteristirc • Blacks almost 2/3's of population • 57 % non -families • High unemployment (20%) • College students 43 % of enrolled students • 13 % without phones; 38 % without automobile • High percentage of disabled, young and old; 25 % +65 have mobility limitations • High percentage foreign born recently entered U.S. (77%) • High percentage of poverty in all categories • Over 50% of renters pay more than 35% of income for rent and almost 1/3 of home owners pay more than 35 % of income for mortgage 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tract 16 Race: Black with 21 % white Household Characteristics: Families; married couples Children: Fewer; older school age Relative Age: Older (38) Education mixed: 28% with no diploma but 11% with grad. prof. degree Employment: Lower percentage in work force and high percentage of men not in work force Income: Mid to very high Housing: single family; owner occupancy; high value ($64K); older (pre 1960, most pre 1940) Neighborhood Stability: Very stable Mobility: Very mobile, but a number of disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • Blacks 78% of population • High percentage of all parents work (92% under 6 and 89% 6-17 years) • High percentage collecting social security and high percentage of +65 _ below poverty level • 61 % of renters pay more than 35% of income for rent ardAC:\WPWMMV PDOCSUUMILTOMPROF M.WPD Tract 17_01 Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Relative Age: Education: Employment: Income: Housing: Neighborhood Stability: Mobility (Disability): White Families; married couples Few (14 %), but high percentage college age Very old (49) High Low percentage in labor force Very high; per capita $38K ($12K for city) Single-family; owner occupancy;high value ($110K)(1950-70) Stable Very high; few disabled • +65's=30% of population • High rents but low percentage of income • High percentage of all parents in work force • High percentage of retirement, social security and self-employment income • High number of condominiums Tract 17.02 Race: White Household Characteristics: Families; married couples Children: Fewer, but most school age Relative Age: Older (36) Education: High Employment: Lower percentage in work force Income: High Housing: s.f. and mobile homes; owner occupancy; high value ($79K); newer stock (1960-80) Neighborhood Stability: Stable Mobility: High; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High percentage of all parents work • High percentage of social security and retirement income r&C:\WPWII MMTD0CSJUMLT0NU%0FICES.WM Tract 19 Race: White, with 24% black Household Characteristics: Non -family 77% with 61% living alone and 16% over 65 Children: Fewer children (1 I ft college age Relative Age: .Education: Normal (29) Higher Employment: Low percentage in labor force; high unemployment Income: Low to middle Housing: Renters (86%) most m.£; 2-10+ units; older stock +1960 Neighborhood Stability: High turnover Mobility: Low Unusual or Unique Characteristics • Most elderly in group quarters • High percentage with social security income • College age 47% of enrolled • High percentage of +65 with disabilities • A higher number of foreign born • Higher poverty in all categories • 28% without car; 17% without phone sriAC-.XIM 6MIVPDOCMRAMILTOMPROnLFS.WPD Tract 20 Race: White with 19 % black and 12 % Hispanic origin Household Characteristics: Families with married couples, but 23 % female heads and 43 % non -families Children: More and quite young Relative Age: Normal (27) Education: Low Employment: Low percentage in work force; high unemployment Income: Low Housing: Renter 58%; s.f. =m.f. (2 to 4 units predominate); very low value owner occupancy ($29); older stock (pre-1939) Neighborhood Stability: High turnover Mobility: Low; few disabled • High number of renters • High percentage school aged children • 20 % of population without phones; 26 % without automobile • 35 % without diplomas • All but +65's below poverty level • High unemployment; women not in work force • High number of older teenagers not in school (20%), not in labor force (11 %) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tract 21 Race: White„ with 21% black; 15% Hispanic Household Characteristics: Families; married couples, but 23% female heads Children: High percentage -- 32% of population Relative Age: Normal Education: Low -- 35% no diploma Employment: Normal, except. low percentage of males in labor force Income: Low to middle Housing: s.£; owner occ.; low value; older stock (pre 1939); fairly high rent with 44% paying +35% of income Neighborhood Stability: High turnover Mobility: Disabled in all age groups • Hispanic population almost 2x normal • High.percentage of pre-primary children • High percentage of income public assistance • Poverty status in almost every age category rcAC:\WPWINMWPDOC9MAMILTOMMOF ffM.WM Tract 22 Race: White Household Characteristics: Families; married couples, but high percentage +65 live alone Children: Fewer Relative Age: Older (35) Education: High Employment: Normal Income: Middle Housing: s.f.; owner occ.; older (pre 1950) Neighborhood Stability: Stable Mobility: Very high; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • 17% of population +65 • 13% of +65's live alone • High percentage of all parents in work force • High percentage pre-primary children • High social security and retirement income • High self employment &-M 1WPWWMWPD0CS1UhffLT0MPR0nLES.WPD 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tract 23 Race: White Household Characteristics: Families; married couples, but high percentage +65 living alone Children: Few young; college age Relative Age: Older (34) Education: Above normal Employment: Normal, exp. high percentage of all parents in work force Income: Middle Housing: s.£; owner occ.; old stock (pre 1940) Neighborhood Stability: Stable Mobility: High; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • +65's 17% of population • College students 47% of enrolled • High percentage of all parents in work force • High percentage retirement and social security income • Two groups -- elderly and grad students? srd1C.%VMMMVVPDO SUUMILTOMPROFuES.WPD 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tract 24 Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Relative Age: Education: Employment: Income: Housing: Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: PROET E RRTRF White Families; married couples Normal Normal (27) Just above normal Normal Middle s. f. ; owner occ.; older stock (pre 1939) Stable High; few disabled Unncual or Unique Characteristicc • Fairly high percentage of older teenagers not in school and not employed • Above average with retirement income 1 i 1 Tract 25 Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Relative Age: Education: Employment: Income: Housing: Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: White Families; married couples, but fair percentage of +65 living alone Fewer Older (35) Slightly above normal Less men in labor force Middle s.f.; owner occupied; older stock Stable Mobile; few disabled • 18 % of population over 65 • High percentage of social security an retirement income • High percentage of pre-primary children--12% of enrolled • High percentage of all parents in work force 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Y 1 f 1 1 Tract 26 Race: White Household Characteristics: Families with marred couples but many non -family (40%) live alones and +65's Children: Fewer Relative Age: Normal (31) Education: Normal Employment: Normal, but few families with all parents in labor force Income: Low to middle Housing: Single-family; owner occupancy, but large (+10 units) m.£; older stock (pre 1960) Neighborhood Stability: Fairly stable Mobility: High; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High percentage of non -families with 32% living alone and 10% +65 • High number of preprimary students (14% of enrolled) • High number of teenagers not in school (21%) & not in labor force (13%) • High social security income • Some poverty in younger age groups rd1C'%Vn WWfMWPDOCSUUNULTON%PROnl,ES.WPD Tract 27 Race: White Household Characteristics: Families; married couples Children: Fewer; school age Relative Age: Slightly older (33) Education: Slightly higher Employment: Normal, but higher percentage of females in labor force Income: Housing: Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: Low to middle s.f.; owner occupancy (1940-70) Stable High; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High percentage of enrolled students elementary/high school (70%) • High percentage of all parents in work force • Higher percentage of retirement and social security income rcAC.NVM MVVPDOC SUUM LTOMMOFUM.WPD Tract 28 Race: White Household Characteristics: Families; married couples Children: Relative Age: Education: Employment: Income: Housing: Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: Fewer; a few college age Older (33) Above normal Normal, but all parents work Low to middle s.f.; owner occupancy (1940-70) Fair stability Good but a few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High percentage of population +65 (14%) • High percentage of teenagers not in school, but employed • High percentage of all parents in work force • High percentage with retirement and social security income rd\C:\WPW WgMVn DOCSVUWULTONTROnLES.WPD Tract 29.01 Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Relative Age: White with 12 % blacks Families; married couples Few lids Normal Education: Higher; many with BA's and graduate degrees Employment: Normal total percentage in labor force, but high females in Income: Middle Housing: s.f. attached and detached with owner occ.; some 2-4 unit structures (1970-90) Neighborhood Stability: Moderately stable Mobility: High; no disabled • High number college students -- 46 % of enrolled • Pre-primary also high 11 % • High percentage of all parents work Tract 29_02 Race: White with 13 % black Household Characteristics: Non -families 67% Children: Few children Relative Age: Much younger (25) Education: High Employment: Very high percentage in labor force, specially females Income: Middle Housing: , Mostly renter housing (67%) 10+ units; fairly new (1970-90) Neighborhood Stability: High turnover Mobility: High, some disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • Many college students -- 85.4 % of enrolled • High percentage of over 65's with disabilities • High percentage foreign born recently entered U.S Tract 31.01 Race: White Household Characteristics: Non -family 61% with 52% living alone and 19% +65 Children: Very few; college age Relative Age: Older (38) Education: High Employment: Fewer in labor force, but families with young all parents in labor force Income: Low to middle Housing: Renters (72%); m.f. 5-10+ units; mod. old Neighborhood Stability: Stable Mobility: Good; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • Social security and retirement income high • College students 79% of enrolled • High percentage females -- 62% • 25% of population over 65 wcAC.XA W 6MVVPDOCS%HAbULTONIPROFILBS.WPD Tract 31.02 Race: White Household Characteristics: Families; married couples Children: Fewer; only 24% Relative Age: Older (37) Education High Employment: High percentage in labor force; all parents Income: Middle to very high Housing: Single family; owner occupancy; high value ($85K) (1950-80) Neighborhood Stability: Very stable Mobility: High; no disabled Unusual_ or Unique Characteristics • High percentage of all parents in labor force 1 i Tract 32 Race: White with only 8% blacks, but 12.7% Hispanic origin Household Characteristics: Families; married couples Children: Higher percentage -- 31 % of population school age Relative Age: Normal (30) Education: Fairly low Employment: Normal, but low percentage of females in labor force Income: Middle Housing: s.£; owner occupancy; lower value ($37K); older stock (pre 1950); low rents Neighborhood Stability: Stable Mobility: High, some disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • Almost 2x number of children/1,000 women • High percentage school age children • Almost 1/3 population without diploma • Over 1/3 population +65's with disability; 25% mobility • Many foreign born with 70% having entered U.S. since 1980 Tract 33_01 Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Relative Age: Education: Employment: Income: Housing: Neighborhood Stability: Mobility: White with 18 % black and 6 % Asian Families; married couples with 19 % female heads Higher percentage; < 18 = 31 % of population Normal Normal Normal but all parents in work force Middle s.f.; owner occ., but many 5-10+ units; mid -age stock (1940-80) Fair stability Good; few disabled • High percentage of school age children (64 %) • High percentage of foreign born new arrivals (54 % 1980-90) • High percentage of parents in work force • High percentage of children under 5 under poverty Yoke • Low rent, but high percentage pay more than 35 % of income 1Q_q_ S Tract 33.02 Race: White Household Characteristics: Families; married couples Children: Fewer, but school age many Relative Age: Older (37) Education: High Employment: Normal Income: High to very high; per capita $18K Housing: s.f.; owner occupancy; high value ($74K) (1950-70) Neighborhood Stability: Very stable Mobility: Very mobile but a number of disabled Unusual_ or Unique Characteristics • High percentage elementary/high school age children (69% of enrolled) • High percentage of all parents in work force • High percentage of retirement and self-employment income rd1C-%Vn WMMNVPDOCS UNULTON%PROFILES.WPD Tract 34— Race: White Household Characteristics: Families; married couples Children: Fewer; only 22% Relative Age: Older (37) Education < Higher Employment: Lower percentage in work force Income: Middle Housing: Single family; owner occupancy; high value -- $68K (1950-80) Neighborhood Stability: Very stable Mobility: Good; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High percentage of all parents work • High percentage of social security and retirement income • 18% of population over 65 cdhC:\W P WIN6MW PDOCSVUbULTOMPROFILFS.WPD Tract: 35 PROFILE BRIEF Race: White Household Characteristics: Families; married couples, but 31.8% singles Children: Fewer than projected, especially pre-school age Relative Age: Normal (31) Education: Normal Employment: Above normal number in labor force Income: Norm Housing: Single family 52%; 50% owner occupied Neighborhood Stability: Less stable than norm Mobility: Good mobility except age 65+ nusual or Uniciue Characteristics • Many high school grads; few college degrees • 90% of mothers with child age 6+ work • Much less poverty among all groups but expecially women with children (see above) • High overal housing vacancy rate (13%) Range - The highest and lowest value in the included tracts. Tract 36.01 Race: Almost 50150 black/white Household Characteristics: Families; married couples, but 22% female heads Children: High percentage school age (33%) Relative Age: Normal Education: Above normal Employment: High percentage in labor force Income: Middle Housing: Single-family; owner occupancy (1950-70) Neighborhood Stability: Stable Mobility: Mobile, but a number of disabled in tract Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High rent with 45% paying +35% of income • High number of personstunit (3.1 owner occ. & 3.5 rental) • High percentage of disabled +65's • High percentage of all parents in work force • High poverty in unrelated ind. & children under 5 rd\C.\W PIM60\WPDOCSUUNULTOWIPROFILES. WPD 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tract 36-02 Race: White, but 31 % black; 4 % Asian; 7 % of Hispanic origin Household Characteristics: Families, married couples; but high percentage female heads Children: Many school age (35 %) Relative Age: Lower (26) Education: Low -- 32 % without diploma Employment: Low participates in work force Income: Low to middle Housing: Single-family attached and detached; owner occupancy = renter (1950-70) Neighborhood Stability: Fairly stable Mobility: Okay, but many disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High percentage persons/unit (3) • High percentage disabled; work disability and +65's mobility • High percentage of older teens not in school nor in work force (43 %) • High percentage of population with public assistance; most categories with higher poverty 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tract 37 Race: White, 16% black (normal) Household Characteristics: Families; married couples Children: Normal, but most school age Relative Age: Older (32) Education: Slightly below normal Employment: Lower number in work force, but all parents work Income: Low to middle Housing: More renters than owner occupancy; 25% 10+ units, but still 61 % single-family (normal) (1950-70) Neighborhood Stability: Fairly stable Mobility: Lower; 18% of population without automobile; few disabled • Many living group quarters • All parents work • High percentage with retirement, social security and public assistance • High percentage of +65, female household heads and unrelated below poverty level rd\C:\WPWWMYn'DOCSI UNMTOMPROFR.PS.WPD Tract 3R_M Race: Household Characteristics: Children: Relative Age: Education: White Families; married couples Few, but college age Normal (30) Above normal Employment: High percentage in work force Income: Mid to upper middle Housing: mixed; s.f. det. and attached and m.f. of all sizes; owner occ. v. renters: 50 % v 44 % new stock (1970-90) Neighborhood Stability: Fairly high turnover (inf. students?) Mobility (Disability): Very high; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characterkti s • Very high housing value ($102K) • Fair number of foreign born • High percentage all parents in work force Tract 40 Race: White Household Characteristics: Non -family; +65's living alone Children: Few except college age Relative Age: Normal Education: High Employment: Low percentage Income: Mid to high Housing: s.f. - m.f., esp. 10+ units; owner occ. = renter; old stock (pre 1939) Neighborhood Stability: High turnover Mobility: High; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • <18 years only 18% of population • +65 13% of population • High percentage living in group quarters • High rent with 58% spending more than 30% of income • High value owner occ. ($105K) • High percentage of all parents in work force • High percentage social security, retirement income & self-employed rdkC:%WPWINtMWPDOCS iAARLTON PROFILES.WPD Tract 44.01 Race: White (10% black) Household Characteristics: Non -family; live alone -- virtually all in group quarters Children: Few Relative Age: Young (20) Education: High Employment: Low percentage in labor force Income: Low Housing: Renter; 10+ structures and mobile homes (56%) Neighborhood Stability: High turnover; high percentage from outside county, but a stable base living in tract since before 1959 (16%) Mobility: High; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • Owner occupied housing high value ($81K) • College students 65% of enrolled • Many walkers (not driving car) 71 % adtCA WP WIN60\WPDOCS\HAMILTOWROFiLES.WPD 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 Tract 51 Race: White with ± 1/3 black Household Characteristics: Families; married couples, but 1/3 female heads Children: High number school age Relative Age: Younger Education: Slightly higher than normal Employment: High number in labor force Income: Low to middle Housing: Single family; owner occupancy (1950-85) Neighborhood Stability: Stable Mobility: High Unusual or Unique Characteristics • +65 individuals and females with children below poverty level rd�C.N%7%M 01WPDOCSVUNULTOWROnIM.WPD Tract 52.01 Race: White with 14% black Household Characteristics: Families; married couples, but 24% female heads Children: High school age Relative Age: Normal (29) Education: Above normal Employment: High numbers in labor force Income: Middle Housing: Rentals predominate (50.4%); many s.f. attached and 5-9 unit structures (1950-80) Neighborhood Stability: Stable, but few very long occupancy Mobility: Good; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • More renters than owner occupancy • High percentage of all parents work sd C:NVMWEY6MWPDOCS% Abff TOMPROFCLES.wen Tract 52.02 Race: White Household Characteristics: Families; married couples Children: High number school age Median Age: Younger Education: Normal Employment: High number in labor force; low unemployment Income: Middle Housing: Predominately mobile homes (50.3 %) - generally newer -- 1960+ Neighborhood Stability: Fairly stable Mobility: High; few disabled Unncnal or Unique Chara .tericti c • Persons over 65 only poor group • High owner occupancy housing value ($73K) • Low rents yet 57.5 % of renters spend +35 % of income for rent Tract 53.02 Race: White Household Characteristics: Families; married couples Children: Less school age; more college age Relative Age: Normal Education: Higher education Employment: High percentages Income: Mid to high Housing: mixed: s.f. detached 45%, attached 12%; 5-9 units 12%; mobile 20% Neighborhood Stability: Higher turnover Mobility: High; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High percentage of all parents work • High rents srd1C:\WP WIN60\WPDOCSIHAhIILTOMPROFILES. WPD Tract 53.03 Race: White (10% black) Household Characteristics: Families; married couples but many non -families Children: Average school age; high pre-school Relative Age: Normal (32) Education: Slightly higher than normal Employment: High percentage in labor force Income: Middle; high social security and retirement percentages Housing: s.f. only 54%; 10+ units/structure 35% (1950-80) Neighborhood Stability: Fair turnover Mobility: High; some disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • Many non -family households (43%); 16% +65 • High percentage of all parents work • High poverty in +65 category • High disabilities +65 category Qa\c:\WPVM Y41DOCs\IUNMTO TROFItrs.wPn 1 i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tract 53.04 Race: White with 23% black Household Characteristics: Families; married couples with 21 % female heads and 40% non - family (students) Children: Normal; some college age Relative Age: Younger (28) Education: Slightly higher than normal Employment: High percentage in work force; very high females Income: Low to middle Housing: High percentage renters; 40% 10+ units (1950-85) Neighborhood Stability: Very high turnover Mobility: High; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High percentage of all parents work • High poverty in related children under 5 srdlC:\WPWIN60�W PDOCS1HpMILTON\PROF7LPS.WPD Tract 55.01 Race: White Household Characteristics: Families; married couples Children: Older school age Relative Age: Older (35) Education: Above normal Employment: Normal labor force Income: Middle Housing: single family and mobile homes; owner occupied (1960 on) Neighborhood Stability: Stable Mobility: High; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High percentage of all parents work • A few more self-employed ard\C:\WP%2460\W PDOCSUUNULTOMPROFILES.WPD Tract 65 Race: White (79%) Household Characteristics: Non -family - singles Children: Below average for school aged Relative Age: Slightly younger Education Above average Employment: Low average percentage in labor force - low unemployment Income: 20% below average. High poverty Housing: Single-family majority with many small apts.; 50+ yrs old dominates Neighborhood Stability: Below average - High local churning with above average in migration Mobility: Low disability rate Unusual or Unique Characteristics • 9.2% Hispanics • Renters are 54.4% • Women with school aged children - fewer than average work • 1 in 5 has no car - public transit; 2 1/2 times normal; 1 in 11 has no phone • 49%renters pay 30%+ of income for housing wthC:%VM WMWPDOCS1 UNULTOWROF[LBS.WPD Tract 202.02 Race: White but high black population (32%) Household Characteristics: Families; married couples, but very high female heads Children: Many school age (31%) Relative Age: Education Normal Above normal Employment: High percentage in labor force Income: Middle Housing: s.f = m.f.; owner occ. = renter (1960-80) Neighborhood Stability: Fairly high turnover, but very stable base Mobility: Very high; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High percentage of all parents in labor force • Many school age children sd1C,\WPW MVIPDOCSHAMILTOWROnLES.WPD Tract 214 Race: White Household Characteristics: Families; married couples Children: School age Relative Age: Older (35) Education: Slightly above normal Employment: Average in labor force Income: Mid to high Housing: single family and mobile homes; owner occupancy (1960-80) Neighborhood Stability: Stable Mobility: High; few disabled Unusual or Unique Characteristics • High value owner occupancy ($78K) • Many move -ins from out of county • High percentage of all parents work sr&C:\WP 1NMWM0CMAWLT0NU%0n1M WM