Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2001 Election Commission Redistricting
Michigan Places Total Population and Ranking, April 1, 2000 - April 1, 1990 Area Name April 1, 2000 Ranking of Total Total Population Population Aril 1, 1990 Total Ranking of Total Population Population Aril 1, 2000 - April 1, 1990 Ranking of Ranking of Number Number Percent percent Change Chane Change Chan e Addison village 627 502 632 493 -5 378 -0.79 389 Adrian city 21,574 641 22,097 60 -523 556 -2.37 422 Ahmeek village 157 627 148 618 9 340 6.08 228 Akron village 461 542 421 545 40 278 9.50 181 Alanson village 785 483 677 487 108 201 15.95 104 Albion city 9,144 123 10,066 110 -922 574 -9.16 564 Algonac city 4,613 194 4,551 190 62 242 1.36 335 Allegan city 4,8381 185 4,547 191 291 122 6.40 222 Allen Park city 29,3761 50 31,092 45 -1,716 588 -5.52 506 Allen village 225 614 201 605 24 308 11.94 143 Allendale CDP 11,555 97 6,950 143 4,605 16 66.26 7 Alma city 9,275 121 9,034 116 241 140 2.67 305 Almont village 2,803 259 2,354 276 449 96 19.07 78 Alpena city 11,304 99 11,354 99 -50 449 -0.44 378 Alpha village 198 620 219 601 -21 399 -9.59 568 Anchorville CDP X X 3,202 232 X X X X Ann Arbor city 114,024 7 109,592 7 4,432 19 4.04 270 Applegate village 287 597 297 583 -10 384 -3.37 452 Argentine CDP 2,285 291 1,907 319 378 106 19.82 73 Armada village 1,573 363 1,548 352 25 306 1.61 330 Ashley village 526 525 518 517 8 344 1.54 333 Athens village 1,111 424 990 432 121 192 12.22 139 Atlanta CDP 757 486 X X X X X X Au Gres city 1,0281 440 838 459 1901 154 22.67 60 Au Sable CDP 1,533 367 1,542 354 -9 383 -0.58 382 Auburn city 2,011 315 1,855 327 156 176 8.411 194 Auburn Hills city 19,837 66 17,076 74 2,761 32 16.17 101 Augusta village 899 459 927 439 -28 417 -3.02 438 Bad Axe city 3,462 232 3,484 221 -22 405 -0.63 384 Baldwin village 1,107 425 821 461 286 128 34.84 26 Bancroft village 616 504 599 499 171 318 2.84 300 Bangor city 1,933 324 1,922 316 ill 335 0.57 350 Baraga village 1,285 392 1,231 392 54 255 4.39 263 Barnes Lake -Millers Lake CDP 1,187 409 1,304 381 -117 487 -8.97 563 Baroda village 858 472 657 490 201 148 30.59 40 Bar on village 381 567 393 557 -12 388 -3.05 440 Barton Hills village 335 582 320 578 15 321 4.69 256 Battle Creek city 53,364 28 53,540 28 -176 511 -0.33 374 Bay City city 36,817 39 38,936 36 -2,119 592 -5.44 503 Beal City CDP 345 576 345 571 Ol 365 0.00 365 Bear Lake village 318 589 339 573 -21 400 -6.19 517 Beaverton city 1,106 426 1,150 407 -44 441 -3.83 466 Beecher CDP 12,793 90 14,465 83 -1,672 587 -11.56 587 Beechwood CDP 2,963 251 2,676 255 287 127 10.72 159 Belding city 5,877 169 5,969 162 -92 478 -1.54 404 Bellaire village 1,164 411 1,104 415 60 246 5.43 239 Belleville city 3,997 210 3,270 229 727 75 22.23 63 Bellevue village 1,365 384 1,401 371 -36 429 -2.57 425 Benton Harbor city 11,182 103 12,818 92 -1,636 586 -12.76 597 Benton Heights CDP 5,458 1751 5,465 174 -7 380 -0.13 369 Benzonia village 519 527 449 539 70 231 15.59 106 Berkley city 15,531 80 16,960 75 -1,429 585 -8.43 556 Berrien Springs village 1,862 329 1,927 313 -65 459 -3.37 453 Bessemer city 2,148 301 2,272 288 -124 492 -5.46 504 Beulah village 363 574 421 546 -58 455 -13.78 599 Beverly Hills village 10,4371 113 10,610 104 -173 510 -1.63 406 Big Bay CDP 1 2651 6021X X X X Ix Ix Source: Census 2000 Redistricting Data (P.L. 94-171) Summary File, 1990 Census of Population and Housing P.L. 94-171. U.S. Census Bureau. Compiled By: Michigan Information Center 3/29/01 1of 11 Michigan Places Total Population and Ranking, April 1, 2000 - April 1, 1990 Big Rapids city 10,849 106 12,603 93 -1,754 589 -13.92 602 Bingham Farms village 1,030 439 1,001 430 29 298 2.90 297 Birch Run village 1,653 351 992 431 661 78 66.63 6 Birmingham city 19,291 69 19,997 67 -706 569 -3.53 457 Blissfield village 3,223 239 3,172 233 51 262 1.61 331 Bloomfield Hills city 3,940 212 4,288 196 -348 541 -8.12 548 Bloomfield Township CDP 43,021 351X X X X X X Bloomfield Township CDP X X 42,137 32 X X X X Bloomingdale village 528 524 503 520 25 305 4.97 251 Boyne City city 3,503 231 3,478 222 25 307 0.72 346 Boyne Falls village 370 571 369 563 1 364 0.27 362 Breckenridge village 1,339 387 1,301 382 38 280 2.92 296 Breedsville village 235 609 213 603 22 313 10.33 162 Bridgeport CDP 7,849 140 8,569 119 -720 570 -8.40 555 Bridgman city 2,428 282 2,140 297 288 125 13.46 127 Brighton city 6,701 154 5,686 167 1,015 58 17.85 88 Britton village 699 494 694 482 5 353 0.72 345 Bronson city 2,421 283 2,342 277 791 220 3.37 288 Brooklyn village 1,176 410 1,027 423 149 179 14.51 114 Brown City city 1,334 388 1,244 390 90 213 7.23 212 Brownlee Park CDP 2,588 269 2,536 267 52 259 2.05 323 Buchanan city 4,681 190 4,992 181 -311 535 -6.23 518 Buckley village 550 520 402 553 148 180 36.82 25 Buena Vista CDP 7,845 141 8,196 126 -351 543 -4.28 477 Burlington village 405 563 294 585 111 198 37.76 24 Burr Oak village 7971 480 882 452 -85 473 -9.64 569 Burt CDP 1,122 422 1,169 403 -47 447 -4.02 469 Burton city 30,308 45 27,617 51 2,691 33 9.74 174 Byron Center CDP 3,777 222 X X X X X X Byron village 595 509 573 508 22 314 3.84 274 Cadillac city 10,000 1161 10,104 108 -104 485 -1.03 395 Caledonia village 1,102 429 885 451 217 146 24.52 56 Calumet village 879 465 818 463 61 244 7.46 208 Camden village 550 521 482 525 68 234 14.11 118 Canada Creek Ranch CDP 405 562 X X X X X X Canadian Lakes CDP 1,922 327 X X X X X X Canton CDP 76,366 16 57,047 25 19,319 1 33.87 29 Ca ac village 1,7751 339 1,583 351 192 152 12.13 140 Carleton village 2,562 270 2,770 252 -208 520 -7.51 541 Carne village 225 613 197 608 28 299 14,21 117 Caro village 4,145 207 4,054 203 91 212 2.24 315 Carrollton CDP 6,602 156 6,521 154 81 218 1.24 339 Carson City city 1,190 407 1,158 406 32 289 2.76 303 Carsonville village 502 5341 583 506 -81 469 -13.89 601 Caseville village 888 460 857 456 31 290 3.62 280 Casnovia village 315 591 376 562 -61 457 -16.22 607 Caspian city 997 444 1,031 422 -34 428 -3.30 451 Cass City village 2,643 267 2,276 286 367 108 16.12 102 Cassopolis village 1,740 343 1,822 331 -821 471 -4.50 487 Cedar Springs city 3,112 243 2,600 260 5121 92 19.69 74 Cement City village 452 546 493 523 -41 437 -8.32 554 Center Line city 8,531 130 9,026 117 -495 552 -5.48 505 Central Lake village 990 449 954 436 36 285 3.77 276 Centreville village 1,579 362 1,516 358 63 239 4.16 267 Charlevoix city 2,994 248 3,116 236 -122 491 -3.92 468 Charlotte city 8,389 132 8,083 130 306 118 3.79 275 Chatham village 231 612 268 591 -37 430 -13.81 600 Cheboygan city 5,295 177 4,999 180 296 120 5.92 232 Chelsea village 4,398 201 3,772 216 626 82 16.60 99 Chesaning village 2,548 271 2,567 264 -19 398 -0.74 387 Clare city 3,173 241 3,021 240 152 178 5.03 247 Clarkston village X X 1,005 429 X X X X Clarksville village 3171 5901 360 565 -431 438 -11.94 591 Source: Census 2000 Redistricting Data (P.L. 94171) Summary File, 1990 Census of Population and Housing P.L. 94-171. U.S. Census Bureau. Compiled By: Michigan Information Center 3/29/01 2of 11 Michigan Places Total Population and Ranking, April 1, 2000 - April 1, 1990 Clawson city 12,732 91 13,874 87 -1,142 582 -8.23 553 Clayton village 326 584 384 560 -58 454 -15.10 604 Clifford village 324 587 354 570 -30 419 -8.47 557 Climax village 791 481 677 486 114 196 16.84 95 Clinton CDP 95,648 lox X X X X X Clinton CDP X X 85,866 lox X X X Clinton village 2,293 289 2,475 269 -182 514 -7.35 538 Clio city 2,483 277 2,629 258 -146 500 -5.55 507 Coldwater city 12,697 92 9,607 112 3,090 31 32.16 35 Coleman city 1,296 391 1,237 391 59 249 4.77 254 Coloma city 1,595 357 1,679 343 -84 472 -5.00 496 Colon village 1,227 400 1,224 394 3 360 0.25 363 Columbiaville village 815 478 934 438 -119 489 -12.74 596 Comstock Northwest CDP 4,472 198 3,402 225 1,070 54 31.45 38 Comstock Park CDP 10,674 109 6,530 153 4,144 24 63.46 8 Concord village 1,101 430 944 437 157 175 16.63 98 Constantine village 2,095 307 2,032 303 63 240 3.10 292 Coopersville city 3,910 217 3,421 224 489 93 14.29 115 Copemish village 232 610 222 600 10 338 4.50 260 Copper City village 205 617 198 607 7 347 3.54 285 Corunna city 3,381 235 3,091 237 290 124 9.38 183 Croswell city 2,467 279 2,174 293 293 121 13.48 126 Crystal Falls city 1,791 338 1,922 317 -131 495 -6.82 531 Custer village 318 588 312 582 6 351 1.92 324 Cutlerville CDP 15,114 82 11,228 101 3,886 25 34.61 27 Daggett village 270 600 260 594 10 339 3.85 273 Dansville village 429 558 437 542 -8 382 -1.83 411 Davison city 5,536 174 5,693 166 -157 504 -2.76 429 De Tour Village village 421 560 407 549 14 324 3.44 286 De Witt city 4,702 1891 3,964 207 738 72 18.62 79 Dearborn city 97,775 9 89,286 9 8,489 6 9.51 180 Dearborn Heights city 58,264 27 60,838 24 -2,574 595 -4.23 475 Decatur village 1,838 333 1,760 335 781 221 4.43 262 Deckerville village 944 454 1,015 426 -711 464 -7.00 533 Deerfield village 1,005 443 922 440 831 216 9.00 188 Detroit Beach CDP 2,289 290 2,113 298 176 163 8.33 198 Detroit city 951,270 1 1,027,974 1 -76,704 612 -7.46 540 Dexter village 2,338 286 1,497 363 841 64 56.18 10 Dimondalevillage 1,342 386 1,247 389 95 209 7.62 206 Douglas village 1,214 403 1,040 420 174 164 16.73 96 Dowagiac city 6,147 166 6,409 156 -262 530 -4.09 472 Dryden village 815 476 628 495 187 156 29.78 41 Dundee village 3,522 230 2,664 256 858 63 32.21 34 Durand city 3,933 215 4,283 197 -350 542 -8.17 550 Eagle village 130 629 120 620 10 336 8.33 197 East Detroit city X X 35,283 40 X X X X East Grand Rapids city 10,764 107 10,807 103 -43 439 -0.40 376 East Jordan city 2,507 275 2,240 291 267 135 11.92 144 East Lansing city 46,525 32 50,677 30 -4,152 602 -8.19 552 East Tawas city 2,951 253 2,887 249 64 237 2.22 316 Eastlake village 441 551 473 530 -32 421 -6.77 529 Eastpointe city 34,077 42 X X X X X X Eastwood CDP 6,265 164 6,340 157 -75 466 -1.18 400 Eaton Rapids city 5,330 176 4,695 186 635 81 13.53 125 Eau Claire village 656 497 494 522 162 170 32.79 31 Ecorse city 11,229 102 12,180 95 -951 575 -7.81 544 Edgemont Park CDP 2,442 2801 2,532 268 -90 475 -3.55 458 Edmore village 1,244 397 1,126 412 118 194 10.48 161 Edwardsburg village 1,147 415 1,142 410 5 354 0.44 352 Elberta village 457 545 478 527 -21 401 -4.39 483 Elk Rapids village 1,700 348 1,626 346 74 225 4.55 259 Elkton village 863 469 9581 433 -95 480 -9.92 572 Ellsworth village 4831 539 4181 547 65 235 15.55 107 Source: Census 2000 Redistricting Data (P.L. 94-171) Summary File, 1990 Census of Population and Housing P.L. 94-171. U.S. Census Bureau. Compiled By: Michigan Information Center 3/29/01 3of 11 Michigan Places Total Population and Ranking, April 1, 2000 - April 1, 1990 Elsie village 1,055 438 957 434 98 206 10.24 166 Emmett village 251 605 297 584 -46 445 -15.49 605 Empire village 378 569 355 568 23 311 6.48 221 Escanaba city 13,140 89 13,659 89 -519 555 -3.80 465 Essexville city 3,766 223 4,088 201 -322 538 -7.88 545 Estral Beach village 486 538 430 543 56 251 13.02 131 Evart city 1,738 3441 1,744 338 -6 379 -0.34 375 Fair Haven CDP X X 1,505 361 X X X X Fair Plain CDP 7,828 142 8,051 131 -223 522 -2.77 431 Fairgrove village 627 503 592 502 35 286 5.91 233 Farmington city 10,423 114 10,132 106 291 123 2.87 298 Farmington Hills city 82,111 12 74,652 14 7,459 8 9.99 170 Farwell village 855 473 851 457 4 357 0.47 351 Fennville city 1,459 376 1,023 424 436 99 42.62 19 Fenton city 10,582 1101 8,444 125 2,138 37 25.32 51 Ferndale city 22,105 61 25,084 52 -2,979 598 -11.88 589 Ferrysburg city 3,040 246 2,919 247 121 193 4.15 268 Fife Lake village 466 541 394 554 72 228 18.27 83 Flat Rock city 8,488 131 7,290 139 1,198 47 16.43 100 Flint city 124,943 4 140,761 4 -15,818 611 -11.24 584 Flushing city 8,348 134 8,542 121 -194 518 -2.27 421 Forest Hills CDP 20,942 651 16,690 76 4,252 21 25.48 50 Forestville village 127 630 153 615 -26 412 -16.99 610 Fountain village 175 624 165 611 10 337 6.06 230 Fowler village 1,136 417 912 446 224 144 24.56 55 Fowlerville village 2,972 250 2,648 257 324 115 12.24 138 Frankenmuth city 4,838 186 4,408 193 430 101 9.75 173 Frankfort city 1,513 370 1,546 353 -33 426 -2.13 416 Franklin village 2,937 2541 2,626 259 311 117 11.84 146 Fraser city 15,297 81 13,899 85 1,398 43 10.06 169 Free Soil village 177 623 148 616 29 294 19.59 76 Freeland CDP 5,147 179 1,421 368 3,726 27 262.21 1 Freeport village 444 550 458 537 -14 389 -3.06 442 Fremont city 4,224 205 3,875 213 349 109 9.01 187 Fruit ort village 1,124 421 1,090 417 34 288 3.12 291 Gaastra city 339 580 376 561 -37 431 -9.84 571 Gagetown village 389 565 337 574 52 257 15.43 108 Gaines village 366 572 427 544 -61 458 -14.29 603 Galesburg city 1,988 318 1,863 326 125 189 6.71 218 Galien village 593 511 596 501 -3 371 -0.50 380 Garden City city 30,047 48 31,846 44 -1,799 590 -5.65 512 Garden village 240 607 268 590 -28 415 -10.45 577 Gaylord city 3,681 226 3,256 230 425 102 13.05 130 Gibraltar city 4,264 203 4,297 195 -33 427 -0.77 388 Gladstone city 5,032 181 4,565 188 467 95 10.23 167 Gladwin city 3,001 247 2,682 254 319 116 11.89 145 Gobles city 815 477 769 471 46 268 5.98 231 Goodrich village 1,353 3851 916 443 437 98 47.71 14 Grand Beach village 221 615 146 619 751 223 51.37 13 Grand Blanc city 8,242 135 7,760 133 482 94 6.21 226 Grand Haven city 11,168 104 11,951 96 -783 571 -6.55 527 Grand Ledge city 7,813 143 7,579 135 234 142 3.09 293 Grand Rapids city 197,800 2 189,126 2 8,674 5 4.59 258 Grandville city 16,263 77 15,624 78 639 80 4.09 269 Grant city 881 463 764 472 117 195 15.31 109 Grass Lake village 1,082 431 903 448 179 160 19.82 72 Grayling city 1,952 321 1,944 311 8 346 0.41 355 Greater Galesburg CDP 1,631 352 1,260 386 371 107 29.44 42 Greenville city 7,935 139 8,101 129 -166 508 -2.05 414 Greilickville CDP 1,415 380 1,165 404 250 139 21.46 67 Grosse Ile CDP 10,894 105 9,781 111 1,113 51 11.38 155 Grosse Pointe city 5,670 1721 5,681 168 -11 387 -0.19 370 Grosse Pointe Farms city 9,7641 1181 10,092 109 -3281 539 -3.251 450 Source: Census 2000 Redistricting Data (P.L. 94-171) Summary File, 1990 Census of Population and Housing P.L. 94-171. U.S. Census Bureau. Compiled By: Michigan Information Center 3/29/01 4of 11 Michigan Places Total Population and Ranking, April 1, 2000 - April 1, 1990 Grosse Pointe Park city 12,443 94 12,857 91 -414 547 -3.22 449 Grosse Pointe Shores village 2,823 258 2,955 242 -132 496 -4.47 485 Grosse Pointe Woods city 17,080 74 17,715 72 -635 563 -3.58 459 Gwinn CDP 1,965 320 2,370 275 -405 546 -17.09 611 Hamtramck city 22,976 57 18,372 70 4,604 17 25.06 53 Hancock city 4,323. 202 4,547 192 -224 523 -4.93 494 Hanover village 424 5591 481 526 -57 453 -11.85 588 Harbor Beach city 1,837 334 2,089 300 -252 528 -12.06 593 Harbor Springs city 1,567 364 1,540 355 27 303 1.75 327 Harper Woods city 14,254 85 14,903 81 -649 565 -4.35 480 Harrietta village 169 625 157 614 12 330 7.64 205 Harrison CDP 24,461 55 24,685 54 -224 524 -0.91 392 Harrison city 2,108 304 1,835 329 273 1341 14.88 111 Harrisville city 514 5291 470 531 44 270 9.36 184 Hart city 1,950 322 1,942 312 8 345 0.41 354 Hartford city 2,476 278 2,341 279 135 183 5.77 234 Harvey CDP 1,321 390 1,377 374 -56 452 -4.07 471 HaslettCDP 11,283 101 10,230 105 1,053 55 10.29 165 Hastings city 7,095 150 6,549 151 546 88 8.34 196 Hazel Park city 18,963 71 20,051 66 -1,088 577 -5.43 501 Hemlock CDP 1,5851 360 1,601 349 -16 391 -1.00 394 Hersey village 374 570 354 569 20 316 5.65 238 Hesperia village 954 453 846 458 108 202 12.77 135 Highland Park city 16,746 75 20,121 65 -3,375 601 -16.77 608 Hillman village 685 495 643 492 42 274 6.53 220 Hillsdale city 8,233 136 8,170 128 63 241 0.77 343 Holland city 35,048 41 30,745 49 4,303 20 14.00 120 Holly village 6,135 167 5,595 169 540 89 9.65 176 Holt CDP 11,315 98 11,744 97 -429 549 -3.65 461 Homer village 1,851 331 1,758 336 93 211 5.29 240 Honor village 299 593 292 586 7 348 2.40 311 Hopkins village 592 512 546 511 46 267 8.42 193 Houghton city 7,010 151 7,498 136 -488 551 -6.51 525 Houghton Lake CDP 3,749 224 3,353 227 396 104 11.81 147 Howard City village 1,585 359 1,351 376 234 141 17.32 92 Howell city 9,232 122 8,184 127 1,048 56 12.81 134 Hubbard Lake CDP 993 445 X X X X X X Hubbardston village 394 564 404 552 -10 385 -2.48 424 Hubbell CDP 1,105 4271 1,174 402 -69 463 -5.88 515 Hudson city 2,499 276 2,580 261 -81 470 -3.14 445 Hudsonville city 7,160 149 6,170 160 990 59 16.05 103 Huntington Woods city 6,151 165 6,419 155 -268 532 -4.18 474 Imlay City city 3,869 220 2,921 246 948 60 32.45 32 Indian River CDP 2,008 316 X X X X X X Inkster city 30,115 47 30,772 47 -657 566 -2.14 417 Ionia city 10,569 111 5,935 163 4,634 15 78.08 4 Iron Mountain city 8,154 137 8,525 122 -371 544 -4.35 479 Iron River city 1,929 325 2,095 299 -166 507 -7.92 547 Ironwood city 6,293 162 6,849 145 -556 559 -8.12 549 Ishpeming city 6,686 155 7,200 141 -514 554 -7.14 536 Ithaca city 3,098 244 3,009 241 89 214 2.96 294 Jackson city 36,316 40 37,446 39 -1,130 581 -3.02 437 Jenison CDP 17,211 73 17,882 71 -671 568 -3.75 464 Jonesville village 2,337 287 2,283 285 54 256 2.37 313 K. I. Sawyer AFB CDP 1,443 378 6,577 150 -5,134 606 -78.06 612 Kalamazoo city 77,145 15 80,277 12 -3,132 599 -3.90 467 Kaleva village 509 531 484 524 25 304 5.17 244 Kalkaska village 2,226 293 1,952 310 274 132 14.04 119 Keego Harbor city 2,769 261 2,932 243 -163 505 -5.56 508 Kent City village 1,061 434 899 449 162 171 18.02 87 Kentwood city 45,255 33 37,826 38 7,429 9 19.64 75 Kinde village 534 522 473 529 611 243 12.90 132 Kingsford city 5,549 173 5,480 173 691 233 1.26 336 Source: Census 2000 Redistricting Data (P.L. 94-171) Summary File, 1990 Census of Population and Housing P.L. 94-171, U.S. Census Bureau. Compiled By: Michigan Information Center 3/29/01 f4Ylifl Michigan Places Total Population and Ranking, April 1, 2000 - April 1, 1990 Kingsley village 1,469 375 738 475 731 74 99.05 3 Kingston village 450 547 439 541 11 334 2.51 308 Laingsburg city 1,223 401 1,148 408 75 224 6.53 219 Lake Angelus city 326 585 328 577 -2 368 -0.61 383 Lake Ann village 276 599 217 602 59 248 27.19 45 Lake City city 923 456 858 455 65 236 7.58 207 Lake Fenton CDP 4,876 184 4,091 200 785 66 19.19 77 Lake Linden village 1,081 432 1,203 398 -122 490 -10.14 576 Lake Michigan Beach CDP 1,509 371 1,694 340 -185 515 -10.92 581 Lake Odessa village 2,272 292 2,256 290 16 320 0.71 347 Lake Orion village 2,715 264 3,057 238 -342 540 -11.19 583 Lakeview village 1,112 423 1,108 414 41 359 0.36 359 Lakewood Club village 1,006 4421 659 489 347 110 52.66 12 Lambertville CDP 9,299 120 7,860 132 1,439 42 18.31 82 L'Anse village 2,107 305 2,151 295 -44 443 -2.05 413 Lansing city 119,128 6 127,321 5 -8,193 610 -6.43 523 Lapeer city 9,072 126 7,759 134 1,313 45 16.92 94 Lathrup Village city 4,236 204 4,329 194 -93 479 -2.15 418 Laurium village 2,126 303 2,268 289 -142 498 -6.26 520 Lawrence village 1,059 435 915 444 144 181 15.74 105 Lawton village 1,859 330 1,685 341 174 165 10.33 163 Le Roy village 267 601 251 595 16 319 6.37 223 Lennon village 517 528 534 512 -17 392 -3.18 447 Leonard village 332 583 357 567 -25 410 -7.00 534 Leslie city 2,044 312 1,872 323 172 166 9.19 186 Level Park -Oak Park CDP 3,605 2271 3,502 220 103 204 2.94 295 Lewiston CDP 990 448 X X X X X X Lexington village 1,104 428 779 469 325 114 41.72 21 Lincoln Park city 40,008 38 41,832 33 -1,824 591 -4.36 482 Lincoln village 364 573 337 575 27 301 8.011 201 Linden city 2,861 256 2,415 271 4461 97 18.47 81 Litchfield city 1,458 377 1,317 380 141 182 10.71 160 Livonia city 100,545 8 100,850 8 -305 534 -0.30 372 Lost Lake Woods CDP 339 577 X X X X X X Lowell city 4,013 209 3,983 205 30 293 0.75 344 Ludington city 8,357 133 8,507 124 -150 503 -1.76 409 Luna Pier city 1,483 374 1,507 360 -24 408 -1.59 405 Luther village 339 578 343 572 -4 375 -1.17 399 Lyons village 726 4891 824 460 -98 481 -11.89 590 Mackinac Island city 523 526 469 532 54 253 11.51 151 Mackinaw City village 859 471 875 453 -16 390 -1.83 410 Madison Heights city 31,101 44 32,196 43 -1,095 579 -3.40 454 Mancelona village 1,408 381 1,370 375 38 281 2.77 302 Manchester village 2,160 300 1,753 337 407 103 23.22 59 Manistee city 6,586 158 6,734 147 -148 501 -2.20 420 Manistique city 3,5831 228 3,456 223 127 188 3.67 279 Manitou Beach -Devils Lake CDP 2,080 309 2,061 301 19 317 0.92 342 Manton city 1,221 402 1,161 405 60 247 5.17 243 Maple Rapids village 643 500 680 485 -37 433 -5.44 502 Marcellus village 1,162 412 1,193 401 -311 420 -2.60 427 Marine City city 4,652 191 4,556 189 961 208 2.11 320 Marion village 836 475 807 466 29 297 3.59 282 Marlette city 2,104 306 1,924 314 180 159 9.36 185 Marquette city 19,661 67 21,977 61 -2,316 593 -10.54 578 Marshall city 7,459 146 6,891 144 568 87 8.24 199 Martin village 435 555 462 536 -27 414 -5.84 513 Marysville city 9,684 119 8,515 123 1,169 49 13.73 123 Mason city 6,714 1521 6,768 146 -54 451 -0.80 390 Mattawan village 2,536 273 2,456 270 80 219 3.26 290 Maybee village 505 533 500 521 5 352 1.00 341 Mayville village 1,055 437 1,010 427 45 269 4.46 261 McBain city 584 517 692 483 -108 486 -15.611 606 McBride village 232 611 236 598 -4 374 -1.691 408 Source: Census 2000 Redistricting Data (P.L. 94-171) Summary File, 1990 Census of Population and Housing P.L. 94-171. U.S. Census Bureau. Compiled By: Michigan Information Center 3/29/01 6of 11 Michigan Places Total Population and Ranking, April 1, 2000 - April 1, 1990 Mecosta village 440 552 393 555 47 264 11.96 142 Melvin village 160 626 148 617 12 329 8.11 200 Melvindale city 10,735 108 11,216 102 -481 550 -4.29 478 Memphis city 1,129 420 1,221 396 -92 477 -7.53 542 Mendon village 917 457 920 441 -3 373 -0.33 373 Menominee city 9,131 124 9,398 114 -267 531 -2.84 432 Merrill village 782 484 755 473 27 302 3.58 283 Mesick village 447 549 406 551 41 275 10.10 168 Metamora village 507 532 447 540 60 245 13.42 128 Michiana village 200 619 164 612 36 283 21.95 64 Michi amme CDP 287 596 X X X X X X Michigan Center CDP 4,641 192 4,863 182 -2221 521 -4.57 489 Middletown CDP 9661 450 1,010 428 -44 440 -4.36 481 Middleville village 2,721 263 1,966 308 755 70 38.40 23 Midland city 41,685 36 38,053 37 3,632 28 9.54 179 Milan city 4,775 188 4,040 204 735 73 18.19 86 Milford village 6,272 163 5,511 172 761 68 13.81 122 Millersburg village 263 603 250 596 13 325 5.20 241 Millington village 1,137 416 1,114 413 23 312 2.06 322 Minden City village 242 606 233 599 9 341 3.86 271 Mineral Hills village 214 616 200 606 14 323 7.00 215 No CDP 2,016 313 1,886 320 130 186 6.89 217 Monroe city 22,076 62 22,902 58 -826 572 -3.61 460 Montague city 2,407 284 2,276 287 131 185 5.76 235 Montgomery village 386 5661 388 558 -2 369 -0.52 381 Montrose city 1,619 354 1,811 332 -192 517 -10.60 579 Morenci city 2,398 285 2,342 278 56 252 2.39 312 Morley village 495 536 528 513 -33 423 -6.25 519 Morrice village 882 461 630 494 2521 137 40.00 22 Mount Clemens city 17,312 72 18,405 69 -1,093 578 -5.94 516 Mount Morris city 3,194 240 3,292 228 -98 483 -2.98 436 Mount Pleasant city 25,946 53 23,285 56 2,661 34 11.43 153 Muir village 634 501 667 488 -33 425 -4.95 495 Mulliken village 557 519 590 504 -33 424 -5.59 509 Munising city 2,539 272 2,783 250 -244 527 -8.77 560 Muskegon city 40,105 37 40,283 35 -178 512 -0.44 379 Muskegon Heights city 12,049 96 13,176 90 -1,127 580 -8.55 558 Napoleon CDP 1,254 3961 1,332 378 -78 468 -5.86 514 Nashville village 1,684 349 1,654 344 30 292 1.81 326 Negaunee city 4,576 196 4,741 184 -165 506 -3.48 456 New Baltimore city 7,405 147 5,798 165 1,607 41 27.72 43 New Buffalo city 2,200 296 2,317 282 -117 488 -5.05 498 New Era village 461 543 520 516 -59 456 -11.35 585 New Haven village 3,0711 245 2,331 280 740 71 31.75 37 New Lothrop village 603 507 596 500 7 349 1.17 340 Newaygo city 1,670 350 1,336 377 334 113 25.00 54 Newberry village 2,686 265 1,873 322 813 65 43.41 17 Niles city 12,204 95 12,458 94 -254 529 -2.04 412 North Adams village 514 530 512 519 2 361 0.39 358 North Branch village 1,027 441 1,023 425 4 358 0.39 357 North Muskegon city 4,031 2081 3,919 209 112 197 2.86 299 Northport village 648 498 605 497 43 271 7.11 214 Northview CDP 14,730 83 13,712 88 1,018 57 7.42 209 Northville city 6,459 160 6,226 159 233 143 3.74 277 Norton Shores city 22,527 59 21,755 62 772 67 3.55 284 Norway city 2,959 252 2,910 248 49 263 1.68 328 Novi city 47,386 31 32,998 42 14,388 3 43.60 16 Oak Park city 29,793 49 30,462 50 -669 567 -2.20 419 Oakley village 339 579 362 564 -23 406 -6.35 521 Okemos CDP 22,805 58 20,216 64 2,589 35 12.81 133 Olivet city 1,758 342 1,604 347 154 177 9.60 177 Omer city 337 581 3851 559 -48 448 -12.47 595 Onaway city 993 4461 1,039 421 -46 446 -4.43 484 Source: Census 2000 Redistricting Data (P.L. 94-171) Summary File, 1990 Census of Population and Housing P.L. 94-171. U.S. Census Bureau. Compiled By: Michigan Information Center 3/29/01 7of 11 Michigan Places Total Population and Ranking, April 1, 2000 - April 1, 1990 Onekama village 647 499 515 518 132 184 25.63 49 Onsted village 813 479 801 467 12 331 1.50 334 Ontonagon village 1,769 341 2,040 302 -271 533 -13.28 598 Orchard Lake Village city 2,215 295 2,286 284 -71 465 -3.11 443 Ortonville village 1,535 366 1,252 388 283 130 22.60 61 Oscoda CDP 992 447 1,061 418 -69 462 -6.50 524 Ossineke CDP 1,059 4361 1,091 416 -32 422 -2.93 433 Otisville village 882 462 724 478 158 174 21.82 65 Otsego city 3,933 214 3,937 208 -4 377 -0.10 368 Otter Lake village 437 554 474 528 -37 432 -7.81 543 Ovid village 1,514 369 1,442 367 72 229 4.99 249 Owendale village 296 594 285 587 11 333 3.86 272 Owosso city 15,713 79 16,322 77 -609 560 -3.73 463 Oxford village 3,540 2291 2,929 244 611 831 20.86 69 Palmer CDP 449 548 X X X X X X Parchment city 1,936 323 1,958 309 -22 404 -1.12 397 Parma village 907 458 809 465 98 205 12.11 141 Paw Paw Lake CDP 3,944 211 3,782 215 162 172 4.28 266 Paw Paw village 3,363 236 3,169 234 194 151 6.12 227 Pearl Beach CDP 3,224 238 3,394 226 -170 509 -5.01 497 Peck village 599 5081 558 510 41 277 7.35 211 Pellston village 771 485 583 505 188 155 32.25 33 Pentwater village 958 452 1,050 419 -92 476 -8.761 559 Perrinton village 439 553 393 556 46 266 11.70 148 Perry city 2,065 310 2,163 294 -98 482 -4.53 488 Petersburg city 1,157 414 1,201 400 -44 442 -3.66 462 Petoskey city 6,080 168 6,056 161 24 309 0.40 356 Pewamo village 560 5181 520 514 40 279 7.69 204 Pierson village 185 622 207 604 -22 403 -10.63 580 Pigeon village 1,207 404 1,207 397 0 366 0.00 366 Pinckney village 2,141 302 1,603 348 538 90 33.56 30 Pinconning city 1,386 382 1,291 383 95 210 7.36 210 Plainwell city 3,933 216 4,057 202 -124 493 -3.06 441 Pleasant Ridge city 2,594 268 2,775 251 -181 513 -6.52 526 Plymouth city 9,022 127 9,560 113 -538 557 -5.63 510 Plymouth Township CDP 27,798 52 23,646 55 4,152 23 17.56 90 Pontiac city 66,337 20 71,166 16 -4,829 603 -6.79 530 Port Austin village 737 487 815 464 -78 467 -9.57 567 Port Hope village 310 592 313 581 -3 370 -0.96 393 Port Huron city 32,338 43 33,694 41 -1,356 583 -4.02 470 Port Sanilac village 658 496 656 491 2 362 0.30 361 Portage city 44,897 34 41,042 34 3,855 26 9.39 182 Portland city 3,789 221 3,889 211 -100 484 -2.57 426 Posen village 292 595 263 592 29 295 11.03 158 Potterville city 2,168 299 1,523 356 645 79 42.35 20 Powers village 430 556 271 589 159 173 58.67 9 Prescott village 286 598 314 580 -28 416 -8.921 562 Prudenville CDP 1,737 345 1,513 359 224 145 14.81 113 Quincy village 1,701 347 1,680 342 21 315 1.25 337 Quinnesec CDP 1,187 408 1,254 387 -67 461 -5.34 500 Ravenna village 1,206 405 919 442 287 126 31.23 39 Reading city 1,134 418 1,127 411 7 350 0.62 349 Redford CDP 51,622 29 54,387 27 -2,765 596 -5.08 499 Reed City city 2,430 281 2,379 274 51 261 2.14 319 Reese village 1,375 383 1,414 369 -39 436 -2.76 430 Republic CDP 614 505 X X X X X X Richland village 593 510 465 534 128 187 27.53 44 Richmond city 4,897 183 4,141 198 756 69 18.26 85 River Rouge city 9,917 117 11,314 100 -1,397 584 -12.35 594 Riverview city 13,272 87 13,894 86 -622 561 -4.48 486 Robin Glen-Indiantown CDP 1,158 413 1,395 372 -237 526 -16.99 609 Rochester city 10,4671 112 7,130 142 3,337 29 46.801 15 Rochester Hills city 68,8251 19 61,766 231 7,0591 10 11.431 152 Source: Census 2000 Redistricting Data (P.L. 94-171) Summary File, 1990 Census of Population and Housing P.L. 94-171. U.S. Census Bureau. Compiled By: Michigan Information Center 3/29/01 8of 11 Michigan Places Total Population and Ranking, April 1, 2000 - April 1, 1990 Rockford city 4,626 193 3,750 217 876 62 23.36 58 Rockwood city 3,442 233 3,141 235 301 119 9.58 178 Rogers City city 3,322 237 3,642 218 -320 537 -8.79 561 Romeo village 3,721 225 3,520 219 201 149 5.71 236 Romulus city 22,979 56 22,897 59 82 217 0.36 360 Roosevelt Park city 3,890 219 3,885 212 5 355 0.13 364 Roscommon village 1,133 4191 858 454 275 131 32.05 36 Rose City city 721 4901 686 484 35 287 5.10 246 Rosebush village 379 568 333 576 46 265 13.81 121 Roseville city 48,129 30 51,412 29 -3,283 600 -6.39 522 Rothbury village 416 561 407 550 9 342 2.21 318 Royal Oak city 60,062 26 65,410 21 -5,348 607 -8.18 551 Saginaw city 61,799 25 69,512 18 -7,713 609 -11.10 582 Saginaw Township North CDP 24,994 54 23,018 57 1,976 38 8.58 191 Saginaw Township South CDP 13,801 86 13,987 84 -186 516 -1.33 402 Saline city 8,034 138 6,660 148 1,374 44 20.63 70 Sand Lake village 492 537 456 538 36 284 7.89 202 Sandusky city 2,745 262 2,403 272 342 112 14.23 116 Sanford village 943 455 889 450 54 254 6.07 229 Saranac village 1,326 3891 1,461 364 -135 497 -9.24 565 Saugatuck city 1,065 433 954 435 111 199 11.64 149 Sault Ste. Marie city 16,542 76 14,689 82 1,853 40 12.61 136 Schoolcraft village 1,587 358 1,517 357 70 232 4.61 257 Scottville city 1,266 394 1,287 384 -21 402 -1.63 407 Sebewaing village 1,974 319 1,923 315 51 260 2.65 306 Shelby CDP 65,159 22 48,655 31 16,5041 2 33.92 28 Shelby village 1,914 3281 1,871 324 431 273 2.30 314 Shepherd village 1,536 365 1,413 370 123 191 8.70 190 Sheridan village 705 492 730 477 -25 411 -3.42 455 Sherwood village 324 586 320 579 4 356 1.25 338 Shields CDP 6,590 157 6,634 149 -44 444 -0.66 385 Shoreham village 860 470 737 476 123 190 16.69 97 Shorewood -Tower Hills -Harbert CDP 1,619 355 1,636 345 -17 393 -1.04 396 Skidway Lake CDP 3,147 242 2,569 262 578 86 22.50 62 South Gull Lake CDP 1,526 368 1,453 366 73 226 5.02 248 South Haven city 5,021 182 5,563 171 -542 558 -9.74 570 South Lyon city 10,036 115 5,857 164 4,179 22 71.35 5 South Monroe CDP 6,370 161 5,266 176 1,104 53 20.96 68 South Range village 727 488 745 474 -18 395 -2.42 423 South Rockwood village 1,284 3931 1,221 395 63 238 5.16 245 Southfield city 78,296 14 75,728 13 2,568 36 3.39 287 Southgate city 30,136 46 30,771 48 -635 564 -2.06 415 Sparlin ville CDP X X 1,974 307 X X X X Sparta village 4,159 206 3,968 206 191 153 4.81 253 Spring Arbor CDP 2,188 297 2,010 304 178 161 8.86 189 Spring Lake village 2,514 274 2,537 266 -23 407 -0.91 391 Springfield city 5,189 178 5,582 170 -393 545 -7.04 535 Sprin port village 704 493 707 480 -3 372 -0.42 377 St. Charles village 2,215 294 2,144 296 71 230 3.31 289 St. Clair city 5,802 171 5,116 177 686 76 13.41 129 St. Clair Shores city 63,096 24 68,107 19 -5,011 605 -7.36 539 St. Helen CDP 2,993 249 2,390 273 603 84 25.23 52 St. I nate city 2,678 266 2,568 263 110 200 4.28 265 St. Johns city 7,485 145 7,284 140 201 150 2.76 304 St. Joseph city 8,789 128 9,214 115 -425 548 -4.61 491 St. Louis city 4,494 197 3,828 214 666 77 17.40 91 Stambaugh city 1,243 399 1,281 385 -38 434 -2.97 434 Standish city 1,581 361 1,377 373 204 147 14.81 112 Stanton city 1,504 372 1,504 362 0 367 0.00 367 Stanwood village 204 618 174 609 30 291 17.24 93 Stephenson city 875 467 904 447 -29 418 -3.21 448 ISterling Heights city 124,471 5 117,810 6 6,661 11 .5.651 237 Sterling village 533 5231 520 515 13 327 2.501 309 Source: Census 2000 Redistricting Data (P.L. 94-171) Summary File, 1990 Census of Population and Housing P.L. 94-171. U.S. Census Bureau. Compiled By: Michigan Information Center 3/29/01 Sof 11 Michigan Places Total Population and Ranking, April 1, 2000 - April 1, 1990 Stevensville village 1,191 406 1,230 393 -39 435 -3.17 446 Stockbridge village 1,260 395 1,202 399 58 250 4.83 252 Stony Point CDP 1,775 340 1,598 350 177 162 11.08 157 Sturgis city 11,285 100 10,130 107 1,155 50 11.40 154 Sunfield village 591 513 610 496 -19 397 -3.11 444 Suttons Bay village 589 515 561 509 28 300 4.99 250 Swartz Creek city 5,102 1801 4,851 183 2511 138 5.17 242 Sylvan Lake city 1,735 346 1,884 321 -149 502 -7.91 546 Tawas City city 2,005 317 2,009 305 -4 376 -0.20 371 Taylor city 65,868 21 70,811 17 -4,943 604 -6.98 532 Tecumseh city 8,574 129 7,462 137 1,112 52 14.90 110 Tekonsha village 712 491 722 479 -10 386 -1.39 403 Temperance CDP 7,757 144 6,542 152 1,215 46 18.57 80 Thom sonville village 457 544 416 548 41 276 9.86 172 Three Oaks village 1,829 335 1,786 333 43 272 2.41 310 Three Rivers city 7,328 148 7,413 138 -85 474 -1.15 398 Traverse City city 14,532 84 15,155 80 -623 562 -4.11 473 Trenton city 19,584 68 20,586 63 -1,002 576 -4.87 493 Trowbridge Park CDP 2,012 314 1,831 330 181 158 9.89 171 Troy city 80,959 13 72,884 15 8,075 7 11.08 156 Tumer village 139 628 158 613 -19 396 -12.03 592 Tustin village 237 608 236 597 1 363 0.42 353 Twin Lake CDP 1,613 356 1,328 379 285 129 21.46 66 Twining village 192 621 169 610 23 310 13.61 124 Ubly village 873 468 821 462 52 258 6.33 224 Union City village 1,804 3361 1,767 334 37 282 2.09 321 Unionville village 605 506 590 503 15 322 2.54 307 Utica city 4,577 195 5,081 178 -504 553 -9.92 573 Vandalia village 429 557 357 566 72 227 20.17 71 Vanderbilt village 587 516 605 498 -18 394 -2.98 435 Vandercook Lake CDP 4,809 187 4,642 187 167 168 3.60 281 Vassar city 2,823 257 2,559 265 264 136 10.32 164 Vermontville village 789 4821 776 470 13 328 1.68 329 Vernon village 847 474 913 445 -66 460 -7.23 537 Vicksburg village 2,320 288 2,216 292 104 203 4.69 255 Village of Clarkston city 962 451 X X X X X X Village of Lake Isabella village 1,243 398 X X X Ix X X Wakefield city 2,085 308 2,318 281 -233 525 -10.05 575 Waldron village 590 514 581 507 9 343 1.55 332 Walker city 21,842 631 17,279 73 4,563 18 26.41 47 Walkerville village 254 604 262 593 -8 381 -3.05 439 Walled Lake city 6,713 153 6,278 158 435 100 6.93 216 Warren city 138,247 3 144,864 3 -6,617 608 -4.57 490 Waterford CDP 73,150 17 66,692 20 6,4581 12 9.68 175 Watervliet city 1,843 332 1,867 325 -241 409 -1.29 401 Waverly CDP 16,194 78 15,614 79 5801 85 3.71 278 Wayland city 3,939 213 2,751 253 1,1881 48 43.18 18 Wayne city 19,051 70 19,899 68 -848 573 -4.26 476 Webberville village 1,503 373 1,698 339 -195 519 -11.48 586 Weidman CDP 879 464 696 481 183 157 26.29 48 West Bloomfield Township CDP 64,862 23 54,843 26 10,019 4 18.27 84 West Branch city 1,926 326 1,914 318 12 332 0.63 348 West Ishpeming CDP 2,792 260 X X X X X X West Monroe CDP 3,893 218 3,919 210 -26 413 -0.66 386 Westland city 86,602 11 84,724 11 1,878 39 2.22 317 Westphalia village 876 466 780 468 96 207 12.31 137 Westwood CDP 9,122 125 8,957 118 165 169 1.84 325 White Cloud city 1,420 379 1,147 409 273 133 23.80 57 White Pigeon village 1,627 353 1,458 365 169 167 11.59 150 Whitehall city 2,884 255 3,027 239 -143 499 -4.72 492 Whitmore Lake CDP 6,574 159 3,251 231 3,323 301 102.21 2 Whittemore city 476 540 463 535 13 3261 2.81 301 Williamston city 3,441 2341 2,922 245 519 911 17.76 89 Source: Census 2000 Redistricting Data (P.L. 94-171) Summary File, 1990 Census of Population and Housing P.L. 94-171. U.S. Census Bureau. Compiled By: Michigan Information Center 3/29/01 i[ti9ifl Michigan Places Total Population and Ranking, April 1, 2000 - April 1, 1990 Wixom city 13,263 88 8,550 120 4,713 14 55.12 11 Wolf Lake CDP 4,455 199 4,110 199 345 111 8.39 195 Wolverine Lake village 4,415 200 4,727 185 -312 536 -6.60 528 Wolverine village 359 575 283 588 76 222 26.86 46 Woodhaven city 12,530 93 11,631 98 899 61 7.73 203 Woodland Beach CDP 2,179 298 2,309 283 -130 494 -5.63 511 Woodland village 495 535 466 533 29 296 6.22 225 Wurtsmith AFB CDP X X 5,080 179 X X X X Wyandotte city 28,006 51 30,938 46 -2,932 597 -9.48 - 566 Wyoming city 69,368 18 63,891 22 5,477 13 8.57 192 Yale city 2,063 311 1,977 306 86 215 4.35 264 Ypsilanti city 22,362 601 24,846 53 -2,484 594 -10.00 574 Zeeland city 1 5,8051 1701 5,417 1751 388 1051 7.161 213 Zilwaukee city 1,7991 3371 1,850 328 -51 450 -2.761 428 Source: Census 2000 Redistricting Data (P.L. 94-171) Summary File, 1990 Census of Population and Housing P.L. 94-171. U.S. Census Bureau. Compiled By: Michigan Information Center 3/29/01 11of 11 .38.E • y�zy 6/26/01 11:32 AM No. 60] [July 12, 2001 ] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 4027, 4028, 5001, 5002, 5003, 5004, 5005, 5016, 5017, 5018, 5019, 5048, 5998. Marshall twp Newton twp Pennfield twp Kalamazoo County (part) Brady twp Charleston twp Climax twp Comstock twp Galesburg city Pavilion twp Richland twp Ross twp Schoolcraft twp Wakeshma twp DISTRICT 064 Jackson County (part) Concord twp Hanover twp Jackson city Napoleon twp Parma twp Pulaski twp Sandstone twp Spring Arbor twp Summit twp DISTRICT 065 Eaton County (part) Brookfield twp Eaton Rapids city Hamlin twp Jackson County (part) Blackman twp Columbia twp Grass Lake twp Henrietta twp Leoni twp Liberty twp Norvell twp Rives twp Springport twp Tompkins twp Waterloo twp Lenawee County (part) Cambridge twp DISTRICT 066 Livingston County (part) Brighton city Brighton twp Genoa twp Green Oak twp Marion twp (part) TRACT 725100 including block(s) 4018. TRACT 730100 including block(s) 1701 5006, 5007, 5008, 5009, 5010, 5011, 5012, 5013, 5014, 5015, 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032, 1033, 1034, 1035, 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 1702 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [July 12, 2001] [No. 60 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028. TRACT 730600 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2999. TRACT 733100 including block(s) 1007. Oceola twp Oakland County (part) Milford twp DISTRICT 067 Ingham County (part) Alaiedon twp Aurelius twp Bunker Hill twp Delhi Charter twp Ingham twp Lansing city (part) TRACT 001702 including block(s) 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032, 1033, 1034. TRACT 003601 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014. TRACT 003602 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019. TRACT 003700 including block(s) 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005. TRACT 005100 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2020, 2021, 2024, 2025. TRACT 005201 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019. TRACT 005202 including block(s) 9000, 9002, 9003, 9029, 9030, 9031, 9032, 9033, 9034, 9035, 9036, 9037. TRACT 005302 including block(s) 2001, 2002, 2003, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030, 2031, 2032, 2033, 2034, 2035, 2036, 2037, 2038, 2039, 2040, 2041, 2042, 2043, 2044, 2045, 2046, 2047, 2048. TRACT 005303 including block(s) 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021. TRACT 005304 including block(s) 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032, 1036, 1042, 1044, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017. TRACT 005501 including block(s) 9004. TRACT 005600 including block(s) 9038, 9039, 9046. No. 601 [July 12, 200 11 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 1703 Leroy twp Leslie city Leslie twp Locke twp Mason city Onondaga twp Stockbridge twp Vevay twp Wheatfield twp White Oak twp Williamston city Williamstown twp (part) TRACT 005800 including block(s) 2025, 2026, 2027, 2999, 3020, 4000, 4002, 4003, 4005, 4006. DISTRICT 068 Ingham County (part) Lansing city (part) TRACT 000100 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027. TRACT 000200 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030, 2031, 2032, 2033. TRACT 000300 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006. TRACT 000400 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, 4010, 4011, 4012, 4013, 4014, 4015, 4016, 4017, 4018, 4019, 4020, 4021, 4022, 4023, 4024, 4025, 4026, 4027, 4028, 4029, 4030, 4031, 4032, 4033, 4034, 4035. TRACT 000500 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010. TRACT 000600 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011. TRACT 000700 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011. TRACT 000800 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008. TRACT 000900 including block(s) 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017. TRACT 001000 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2028, 2029. TRACT 001200 including block(s) 1000, 1004, 1005, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1021, 1025, 1026, 1704 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [July 12, 2001] [No. 60 1027, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014. TRACT 001300 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032, 1033, 1034, 1035, 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1042, 1043, 1044, 1045. TRACT 001400 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028. TRACT 001500 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030, 2031, 2032, 2033, 2034, 2035, 2036, 2037, 2038, 2039, 2040, 2041, 2042, 2043, 2044, 2045, 2046, 2047, 2048, 2049, 2050, 2051, 2997, 2998, 2999. TRACT 001600 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020. TRACT 001701 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1997, 1998, 1999. TRACT 001702 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1035, 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1042, 1043, 1044, 1045, 1046, 1047. TRACT 001900 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032, 1033, 1034, 1035, 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039. TRACT 002000 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017, 3018, 3019, 3020, 3021, 3022, 3023, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, 4010, 4011, 4012, 4013, 4014, 4015, 4016, 4017, 4018, 4019, 4020, 4021, 4022, 4023, 4024, 4025, 4026, 4027. TRACT 002100 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028. TRACT 002200 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030, 2031, 2032, 2033, 2034. TRACT 002300 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017, 3018, 3019, 3020, 3021, 3022, 3023, 3024, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, 4010, 4011, 4012, 4013, 4014, 4015, 4016. TRACT 002400 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030, 2031, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016. TRACT 002500 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017, 3018, 3019. No. 60] [July 12, 2001 ] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 1705 TRACT 002600 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013. TRACT 002700 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014. TRACT 002800 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017, 3018, 3019, 3020, 3021, 3022, 3023, 3024. TRACT 002901 including block(s) 1005, 1010, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2999. TRACT 002902 including block(s) 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2999. TRACT 003101 including block(s) 1000, 1027, 1028, 1037, 1038. TRACT 003102 including block(s) 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1033, 1034, 1036, 1037, 1045, 1046, 1048, 1049. TRACT 003200 including block(s) 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010. TRACT 003301 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026. TRACT 003302 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022. TRACT 003400 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1004, 1007, 1008, 2000. TRACT 003500 including block(s) 1001, 2000, 2014, 2015, 2016. TRACT 003602 including block(s) 1007. TRACT 003700 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 4000, 4006, 4007, 5000, 5001, 5002, 5003, 5004, 5005, 5006, 5007, 5008, 5009. TRACT 003801 including block(s) 2010, 2011, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2026, 2028, 2029. TRACT 004000 including block(s) 3006. TRACT 004404 including block(s) 1030, 1031, 1032, 1033, 1034, 1035, 1036, 1044, 1045. TRACT 005303 including block(s) 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017, 3018, 3019, 3020, 3021, 3022, 3023, 3024, 3025, 3026, 3027, 3028. TRACT 006500 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017, 3018, 3019, 3020, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, 4010. Lansing twp 1706 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [July 12, 20011 [No. 60 DISTRICT 069 Ingham County (part) East Lansing city (part) TRACT 002901 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1011. TRACT 003801 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2014, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2027. TRACT 003802 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 9000, 9001, 9002, 9003, 9004, 9005, 9006, 9007, 9008, 9009, 9010, 9011, 9014, 9015, 9016. TRACT 003901 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031. TRACT 003902 including block(s) 1000, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017. TRACT 004000 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017, 3018, 3019, 3020, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, 4010, 4011, 4012, 4013, 4014, 4015, 4016, 4017, 4018, 4019, 4020. TRACT 004100 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, 4010, 4011, 4012, 4013, 4014. TRACT 004200 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009. TRACT 004301 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1011, 1012, 1013, 2001, 2002, 2011, 2012, 2013, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, 4010, 4011, 4012, 4013, 4014, 4015, 4016, 4017, 4018, 4019, 4020, 4021, 4022, 4023. TRACT 004302 including block(s) 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008. TRACT 004402 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008. TRACT 004403 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006. TRACT 004404 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1037, 1046, 1047. TRACT 004405 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008. TRACT 004500 including block(s) 1000. TRACT 004600 including block(s) 9028, 9029, 9030, 9031, 9032, 9033. Lansing city (part) TRACT 005001 including block(s) 9005, 9007, 9008, 9067. Meridian twp No. 60] [July 12, 2001 ] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 1707 Williamstown twp (part) TRACT 005700 including block(s) 1007, 1008, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030, 2031, 2032, 9000, 9001, 9002, 9003, 9004, 9005, 9006, 9007, 9008, 9009, 9010, 9011, 9012, 9013, 9014, 9015, 9016, 9017, 9018, 9019, 9020, 9021, 9022, 9023, 9024, 9025, 9026, 9027, 9028, 9029, 9030. TRACT 005800 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1012, 1013, 1014, 2000, 2001, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2011, 3015, 3016, 3017. DISTRICT 070 Ionia County (part) Belding city Berlin twp (part) TRACT 030600 including block(s) 1067. Easton twp Ionia city (part) TRACT 030600 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1004, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032, 1033, 1035, 1036, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1043, 1047, 1051, 1052, 1053, 1055, 1063, 1064, 1065, 1066, 1068, 1069, 1070, 1071, 1993, 1996, 1999. TRACT 031600 including block(s) 1023, 1024, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1033, 1034, 1035, 1036, 1037, 2007, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2018, 2021, 2022, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030, 2031, 2032, 2033, 2034, 3025, 3026, 3027, 3028, 3033, 3034, 3035, 3037, 3038, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008. TRACT 031700 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017, 3018, 3019, 3020, 3021, 3022, 3023, 3024, 3025, 3026, 3027, 3028, 3029, 3030, 3031, 4000, 4004, 4007, 4008, 4014, 4015, 4016, 4017, 4018, 4019, 4020, 4021, 4022, 4023, 4024, 4025, 4026, 4027, 4028, 4029, 4030, 4031, 4032, 4033, 4034, 4035, 4036, 4037, 4038, 4039, 4040, 4043, 4044, 4045, 4046, 4997, 4998. TRACT 031800 including block(s) 1059, 4041. Ionia twp (part) TRACT 031600 including block(s) 2009, 2035. Keene twp Orleans twp Otisco twp Montcalm County DISTRICT 071 Eaton County (part) Bellevue twp Benton twp Carmel twp Charlotte city Chester twp Delta twp Eaton Rapids twp Eaton twp Grand Ledge city (part) TRACT 020401 including block(s) 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2011, 2012, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017, 3018, 3019, 3020, 3021, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4021, 4022, 4023, 4024, 4025, 4026, 4027, 4028, 4029, 4030, 4997, 5000, 5001, 5002, 5003, 5004, 5005, 5006, 5007, 5008, 5009, 5010, 5011, 1708 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [July 12, 2001] [No. 60 5012, 5013, 5014, 5015, 5016, 5017, 5018, 5019, 5020, 5021, 5022, 5023, 5024, 5025, 5026, 5027, 5028, 5029, 5999, 7000, 7001, 7002, 7003, 7004, 7005, 7006, 7007, 7008, 7009, 7010, 7011, 7012, 7013, 7014. TRACT 020402 including block(s) 1001, 1003, 1004, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1998, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2998, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017, 3018, 3019. Kalamo twp Lansing city (part) TRACT 020202 including block(s) 2001, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2997, 2998. TRACT 021400 including block(s) 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3036, 3037, 3038, 3039, 3040, 3041, 3042. Olivet city Oneida Charter twp Potterville city Roxand twp Sunfield twp Vermontville twp Walton twp Windsor twp DISTRICT 072 Kent County (part) Caledonia twp Cascade twp Gaines twp Kentwood city DISTRICT 073 Kent County (part) Algoma twp Cannon twp Cedar Springs city Courtland twp Nelson twp Oakfield twp Plainfield twp Rockford city Solon twp Sparta twp Spencer twp Tyrone twp DISTRICT 074 Kent County (part) Alpine twp Grandville city Ottawa County (part) Coopersville city Crockery twp Georgetown twp Polkton twp Tallmadge twp Wright twp DISTRICT 075 Kent County (part) Grand Rapids city (part) TRACT 000300 including block(s) 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019. Census 2000 PHC-T-6. Population by Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin for the United Stales, Regions, Divisions, States, Puerto Rico, and Places of 100,000 or More Population Table 4. Population by Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin, for States, Puerto Rico, and Places of 100,000 or More Population: 2000 Source: U.S. Census Bureau Internet Release date: April 2, 2001 NOTE: Data not adjusted based on the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, see http://factfinder.census.gov/home/en/datanotes/eX lu.htP 1, Race One race Native American Hawaiian Indian and Hispanic Black or and Other Two or White alone, Total African Alaska Pacific Some or more Latino (o not Hispanic Geographic area' population White American Native Asian Islander other race races any race) or Latino Alabama 4 447 100 3 162 808 1 155 930 22 430 31 346 1 409 28 998 44179 75 830 3 125 819 Birmingham city 242 820 58 457 178 372 422 1 942 87 1 513 2027 3 764 57 096 Huntsville city 158 216 101 998 47 792 857 3 519 88 1 047 2 915 3 225 100 333 Mobile city 198 915 100 251 92 068 487 3 022 52 1 046 1 989 2 828 98 965 Montgomery city 201 568 96 085 100 048 500 2 146 71 748 1 970 2 484 94 868 Alaska 626 932 434 534 21 787 98 043 25 116 3 309 9 997 34146 25 852 423 788 Anchorage municipality' 260 283 188 009 15 199 18 941 14 433 2 423 5 703 15 575 14 799 181 982 Arizona 5 130 632 3 873 611 158 873 255 879 92 236 6 733 596 774 146 526 1 295 617 3 274 258 Chandler city 176 581 136 296 6 151 2 121 7 453 251 18 993 5 316 37 059 121 168 Gilbert town' 109 697 94 043 2 639 676 3 937 134 5 233 3 035 13 026 87 597 Glendale city 218 812 165 293 10 270 3 181 6 003 293 26 188 7 584 54 343 141 462 Mesa city 396 375 323 655 9 977 6 572 5 917 932 38 271 11 051 78 281 290 180 Peoria city 108 364 92 050 3 012 734 2077 120 7 686 2 665 16 699 84 370 Phoenix city 1 321 045 938 853 67 416 26 696 26 449 1 766 216 589 43 276 449 972 736 844 Scottsdale city 202 705 186 883 2 501 1 240 3 964 167 4 603 3 347 14 111 178 462 Tempe city 15B 625 122 952 5 801 3 186 7 531 455 13 464 5 236 28 473 110 517 Tucson city 486 699 341 424 21 057 11 038 11 959 796 81 988 18 437 173 868 263 748 Arkansas 2 673 400 2138698 418 950 17 808 20 220 1 668 40 412 35 744 86 866 2100136 (Little Rock city 183 133 100 848 74 003 500 3 032 64 2 348 2 338 4 889 98 904 California 33 871 648 20 170 059 2 263 882 333 346 3 697 613 116 961 5 682 241 1 607 646 10 966 556 15 816 790 Anaheim city 328 014 179 627 8 735 3 041 39 311 1 393 79 427 16 480 153 374 117 607 Bakersfield city 247 057 152 849 22 641 3 454 10 708 298 46 151 10 956 80 170 126 183 Berkeley city 102 743 60 797 14 007 467 16 837 146 4 764 5 725 10 001 56 691 Burbank city 100 316 72 409 2066 549 9 181 142 9 908 6 061 24 953 59 590 Chula Vista city 173 556 95 553 8 022 1 352 19 063 1 013 38 404 10 149 86 073 55 042 Concord city 121 780 86 114 3 706 929 11 438 612 11 752 7 229 26 560 74 119 Corona city 124 966 77 514 8 031 1 066 9 425 387 21 894 6 629 44 569 58 784 Costa Mesa city 108 724 75 542 1 520 845 7 501 656 18 018 4 642 34 523 61 778 Daly City city 103 621 26 836 4 720 456 52 522 940 11 735 6 412 23 072 18 344 Downey city 107 323 57 395 4 028 929 8 308 236 31 180 5 247 62 089 30 851 East Los Angeles CDP' 124 283 48 788 490 1 603 962 70 67 122 5 248 120 307 2 275 EI Monte city 115 965 41 360 889 1 596 21 465 140 45 544 4 971 83 945 8 542 Escondido city 133 559 90 578 3 009 1 646 5 957 311 25 636 6 422 51 693 69 305 Fontana city 128 929 58 006 15 255 1 450 5 618 427 41 185 6 988 74 424 30 865 Fremont city 203 413 96 968 6 310 1 048 75 165 819 11 230 11 873 27 409 84 149 Fresno city 427 652 214 556 35 763 6 763 48 028 583 99 898 22 061 170 520 159 473 Fullerton city 126 003 77 977 2 861 865 20 259 296 18 666 5 079 38 014 61 420 Garden Grove city 165 196 77 443 2 168 1 260 51 078 1 081 25 362 6 804 53 608 53 735 Glendale city 194 973 123 960 2 468 629 31 424 163 16 715 19 614 38 452 105 597 Hayward city 140 030 60 146 15 374 1 177 26 579 2 679 23 539 10 536 47 850 40 896 Huntington Beach city 189 594 150 194 1 527 1 224 17 709 456 11 019 7 465 27 798 136 237 Inglewood city 112 580 21 505 53 060 773 1 280 410 30 823 4 729 51 829 4 628 Irvine city 143 072 87 354 2068 257 42 672 194 3 627 6 900 10 539 81 613 Lancaster city 118 718 74 573 19 009 1 213 4 523 278 13 190 5 932 28 644 62 256 Long Beach city 461 522 208 410 68 618 3 881 55 591 5 605 95 107 24 310 165 092 152 899 Los Angeles city 3 694 820 1 734 036 415 195 29 412 369 254 5 915 949 720 191 288 1 719 073 1 099 188 Modesto city 188 856 131 414 7 499 2 335 11 388 951 24 066 11 203 48 310 112 466 Moreno Valley city 142 381 66 689 28 310 1 343 8 427 733 28 584 8 295 54 689 45 881 Norwalk city 103 298 46 303 4 774 1201 11 924 404 33 829 4 863 64 965 19 574 Oakland city 399 484 125 013 142 460 2 655 60 851 2002 46 592 19 911 87 467 93 953 Oceanside city 161 029 106 866 10 189 1 370 8 896 2042 23 342 8 324 48 691 86 310 Ontario city 158 007 75 575 11 864 1 682 6 125 587 53 807 8 367 94 610 42 048 Orange city 128 821 90 8222 056 1 010 12 000 296 17 804 4 833 41 434 70 292 Oxnard city 170 358 71 688 6 446 2 143 12 581 698 68 753 8 049 112 807 35 049 Palmdale city 116 670 63 905 16 913 1 198 4 468 224 23 858 6 104 439 47 631 Census 2000 PHC-T-6. Population by Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin for the United States, Regions, Divisions, Stales, Puerto Rico, and Places of 100,000 or More Population Table 4. Population by Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin, for States, Puerto Rico, and Places of 100,000 or More Population: 2000 -Con. Source: U.S. Census Bureau Internet Release date: April 2, 2001 NOTE: Data not adjusted based on the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, see http:/Ifacffinder.census.gov/home/en/datanotes/eX lu.html. Race One race Native American Hawaiian Indian and Hispanic Black or and Other Two or White alone, Total African Alaska Pacific Some or more Latino (of not Hispanic Geographic area population White American Native Asian Islander other race races any race) or Latino California -con. Pasadena city 133 936 71 469 19 319 952 13 399 132 21 444 7 221 44 734 52 381 Pomona city 149 473 62 419 14 398 1 883 10 762 311 52 213 7 487 96 370 25 348 Rancho Cucamonga city 127 743 84 987 10 059 855 7 656 341 16 931 6 914 35 491 70 028 Riverside city 255 166 151 377 18 906 2 779 14 501 991 53 591 13 021 97 315 116 254 Sacramento city 407 018 196 549 62 968 5 300 67 635 3 861 44 627 26 078 87 974 164 974 Salinas city 151 060 68 218 4 943 1 903 9 390 407 58 466 7 733 96 880 36 535 San Bernardino city 185 401 83 849 30 425 2 591 7 772 680 50 286 9 798 88 022 53 630 San Buenaventura (Ventura) cit 100 916 79 511 1 421 1 173 3 028 175 11 245 4 363 24 573 68 710 San Diego city 1 223 400 736 207 96 216 7 543 166 968 5 853 151 532 59 081 310 752 603 892 San Francisco city 776 733 385 728 60 515 3 458 239 565 3 844 50 368 33 255 109 504 338 909 San Jose city 894 943 425 017 31 349 6 865 240 375 3 584 142 691 45 062 269 989 322 534 Santa Ana city 337 977 144 425 5 749 4 013 29 778 1 160 137 360 15 492 257 097 41 984 Santa Clara city 102 361 56 903 2 341 542 29 966 437 7 102 5 070 16 364 49 392 Santa Clarila city 151 088 120 157 3 122 886 7 923 220 12 896 5 884 30 968 104 646 Santa Rosa city 147 595 114 527 3 177 2099 5 675 382 15 180 6 555 28 318 104 581 Simi Valley city 111 351 90 561 1 401 780 7 052 154 7 235 4 168 18 729 80 908 Stockton city 243 771 105 446 27 417 2 727 48 506 981 42 208 16 486 79 217 78 539 Sunnyvale city 131 760 70 193 2 927 608 42 524 428 9 474 5 606 20 390 61 221 Thousand Oaks city 117 005 99 563 1 241 627 6 873 124 5 274 3 303 15 328 90 862 Torrance city 137 946 81 605 3 022 560 39 462 481 6 307 6 509 17 637 72 234 Vallejo city 116 760 41 996 27 655 767 28 205 1 276 9 196 7 665 18 591 35 533 West Covina city 105 080 46 086 6 696 823 23 849 226 22 295 5 105 48 051 24 124 Colorado 4 301 261 3560006 165 063 44 241 95 213 4 621 309 931 122 187 735 601 3 202 880 Arvada city 102 153 92 999 672 665 2 215 68 3 146 2 388 10 031 87 302 Aurora city 276 393 190 311 37 104 2 248 12 066 501 22 485 11 678 54 764 163 599 Colorado Springs city 360 890 291 095 23 677 3 175 10 179 764 18 091 13 909 43 330 271 734 Denver city 554 636 362 180 61 649 7 290 15 611 648 86 464 20 794 175 704 287 997 Fort Collins city 118 652 106 347 1 213 715 2 948 143 4 281 3 005 10 402 101 384 Lakewood city 144 126 125 611 2 128 1 599 3 918 117 7 028 3 725 20 949 113 755 Pueblo city 102 121 77 830 2 465 1 766 683 63 15 526 3 788 45 066 52 202 Westminster city 100 940 84 983 1 237 745 5 534 77 5 575 2 789 15 369 76 637 Connecticut 3 405 565 2 780 355 309 843 9 639 82 313 1 366 147 201 74 848 320 323 2 638 845 Bridgeport city 139 529 62 822 42 925 664 4 536 148 20 659 7 775 44 478 43 158 Hartford city 121 578 33 705 46 264 659 1 971 135 32 230 6 614 49 260 21 677 New Haven city 123 626 53 723 46 181 535 4 819 79 13 460 4 829 26 443 43 979 Stamford city 117 083 81 718 18 019 243 5 856 46 7 608 3 593 19 635 71 610 Waterbury city 107 271 72 018 17 500 453 1 615 61 11 698 3 926 23 354 62 406 Delaware 783 600 584 773 150 666 2 731 16 259 283 15 855 13 033 37 277 567 973 District of Columbia 572 059 176 101 343 312 1 713 15 189 348 21 950 13 446 44 953 159 178 Washington city 572 059 176 101 343 312 1 713 15 189 348 21 950 13 446 44 953 159 178 Florida 15 982 378 12 465 029 2 335 505 53 541 266 256 8 625 477 107 376 315 2 682 715 10 458 509 Cape Coral city 102 286 95 133 2046 260 938 56 2 253 1 600 8 521 89 535 Clearwater city 108 787 91 223 10 651 346 1 782 75 2 700 2010 9 754 85 015 Coral Springs city 117 549 95 860 10 766 208 4 152 79 3 520 2 964 18 233 82 149 Fort Lauderdale city 152 397 97 941 44 010 344 1 565 74 2 684 5 779 14 406 87 577 Hialeah city 226 419 199 276 5 453 304 906 53 12 380 8 047 204 543 18 267 Hollywood city 139 357 109 190 16 853 381 2 757 117 5 507 4 552 31 392 85 808 Jacksonville city 735 617 474 307 213 514 2 474 20 427 448 9 816 14 631 30 594 457 478 Miami city 362 470 241 470 80 858 810 2 376 130 19 644 17 182 238 351 42 897 Orlando city 185 951 113 611 49 933 638 4 982 150 10 060 6 577 32 510 94 452 3embroke Pines city 137 427 103 870 18 210 255 5 163 68 5 086 4 775 38 700 72 464 St. Petersburg city 248 232 177 133 55 502 769 6 640 130 2 661 5 397 10 502 170 396 Tallahassee city 150 624 91 007 51 569 376 3 617 82 1 457 2 516 6 309 87 047 Tampa city 3034471 194 871 79 11 B 1 155 6 527 281 126461 88491 58 522 154 872 Census 2000 PHC-T-6. Population by Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin for the United Stales, Regions, Divisions, States, Puerto Rico, and Places of 100,000 or More Population Table 4. Population by Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin, for States, Puerto Rico, and Places of 100,000 or More Population: 2000 -Con. Source: U.S. Census Bureau Internet Release date: April 2, 2001 NOTE: Data not adjusted based on the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, see http://factfinder.census.gov/home/en/datanotes/expplu.htmi. Race One race Native American Hawaiian Indian and Hispanic Black or and Other Two or White alone, Total African Alaska Pacific Some or more Latino (of not Hispanic Geographic area' population White American Native Asian Islander other race races any race) or Latino Georgia 8 186 453 5 327 281 2 349 542 21 737 173 170 4 246 196 289 114 188 435 227 5 128 661 Athens -Clarke County' 101 489 65 852 27 656 214 3 173 45 3 123 1 426 6 436 62 895 Atlanta city 416 474 138 352 255 689 765 8 046 173 8 272 5 177 18 720 130 222 Augusta -Richmond County' 199 775 91 006 99 391 552 3 000 249 2024 3 553 5 545 88 660 Columbus city 186 291 93 936 81 488 716 2 864 270 3 533 3 484 8 372 90 668 Savannah city 131 510 51 108 75 072 303 1 997 92 1 224 1 714 2 938 49 903 Hawaii 1 211 537 294 102 22 003 3 535 503 868 113 539 15 147 259 343 87 699 277 091 Honolulu CDP' 371 657 73 093 6 038 689 207 588 25 457 3 318 55 474 16 229 69 503 Idaho 1 293 953 1 177 304 5 456 17 645 11 889 1 308 54 742 25 609 101 690 1 139 291 Boise City city 185 787 171 204 1 437 1 300 3 870 302 3 241 4 433 8 410 167 022 Illinois 12 419 293 9 125 471 1 876 875 31 006 423 603 4 610 722 712 235 016 1 530 262 8424140 Aurora city 142 990 97 340 15 817 511 4 370 47 20 762 4 143 46 557 74 457 Chicago city 2 896 016 1 215 315 1 065 009 10 290 125 974 1 788 393 203 84 437 753 644 907 166 Joliet city 106 221 73 633 19 294 301 1 215 22 9 532 2 224 19 552 64 811 Naperville city 128 358 109 346 3 887 154 12 380 24 967 1 600 4 160 106 386 Peoria city 112 936 78 254 27 992 229 2 629 42 1 355 2 435 2 839 77 138 Rockford city 150 115 109 303 26 072 474 3 301 67 7200 3 698 15 278 102 678 Springfield city 111 454 90 287 17 096 231 1 620 34 525 1 661 1 337 89 510 Indiana 6 080 485 5 320 022 510 034 15 815 59 126 2005 97 811 75 672 214 536 5 219 373 Evansville city 121 582 104 858 13 275 257 870 55 598 1 669 1 392 104 066 Fort Wayne city 205 727 155 231 35 752 806 3205 86 5 993 4 654 11 884 150 368 Gary city 102 746 12 245 86 340 213 140 24 2023 1 761 5 065 10 338 Indianapolis city 791 926 549 100 200 257 1 998 11 283 326 15 980 12 982 30 759 536 496 South Bend city 107 769 71 195 26 522 440 1 292 69 5 250 3 021 9 110 68 202 Iowa 2 926 324 2 748 640 61 853 8 989 36 635 1 009 37 420 31 778 82 473 2 710 344 Cedar Rapids city 120 758 110 931 4 481 306 2 135 78 670 2 157 2065 109 759 Des Moines city 198 682 163 494 16 025 705 6 946 95 6 967 4 430 13 138 158 095 Kansas 2 688 418 2 313 944 154198 24 936 46 806 1 313 90 725 56 496 188 252 2 233 997 Kansas City city 146 866 81 910 44 240 1 103 2 527 56 12 645 4 385 24 639 71 870 Overland Park city 149 080 135 137 3 801 401 5 703 52 1 852 2 134 5 620 131 782 Topeka city 122 377 96 093 14 332 1 603 1 340 50 4 969 3 990 10 847 91 869 Wichita city 344 284 258 900 39 325 3 986 13 647 198 17 566 10 662 33 112 246 924 Kentucky 4 041 769 3 640 889 295 994 8 616 29 744 1 460 22 623 42 443 59 939 3 608 013 Lexington -Fayette' 260 512 211 120 35 116 507 6 407 83 3 165 4 114 8 561 206 174 Louisville city 256 231 161 261 84 586 578 3 705 111 1 709 4 281 4 755 158 651 Louisiana 4 468 976 2856161 1 451 944 25 477 54 758 1 240 31 131 48 265 107 738 2 794 391 Baton Rouge city 227 818 104 117 113 953 405 5 972 76 1 113 2 182 3 918 101 867 Lafayette city 110 257 75 232 31 434 272 1 564 26 641 1 068 2071 74 020 Metairie CDP' 146 136 126 445 9 984 394 4 041 34 2 787 2 451 10 595 119 535 New Orleans city 484 674 135 956 325 947 991 10 972 109 4 498 6201 14 826 128 871 Shreveport city 200 145 93 394 101 679 619 1 590 66 893 1 904 3 106 91 857 Maine 1 274 923 1 236 014 6 760 7 098 9 111 382 2 911 12 647 9 360 1 230 297 Maryland 5 296 486 3 391 308 1 477 411 15 423 210 929 2 303 95 525 103 587 227 916 3 286 547 Baltimore city 651 154 205 982 418 951 2097 9 985 222 4 363 9 554 11 061 201 566 Massachusetts 6 349 097 5 367 286 343 454 15 015 238 124 2 489 236 724 146 005 428 729 5 198 359 Boston city 589 141 320 944 149 202 2 365 44 284 366 46 102 25 878 85 089 291 561 Cambridge city 101 35569 022 12 079 290 12 036 77 3 230 4 621 7 455 65 425 Lowell city 105 167 72 145 4 423 256 17 371 38 6 813 4 121 14 734 65 760 Springfield city 152 082 85 329 31 960 569 2 916 143 25 016 6 149 41 343 74 291 Worcester city 172 648 133 124 11 892 769 8 402 96 12 504 5 861 26 155 122 211 Census 2000 PHC-T-6. Population by Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin for the United States, Regions, Divisions, States, Puerto Rico, and Places of 100,000 or More Population Table 4. Population by Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin, for States, Puerto Rico, and Places of 100,000 or More Population: 2000 -Con. Source: U.S. Census Bureau Internet Release date: April 2, 2001 NOTE: Data not adjusted based on the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, see http://factfinder.census.gov/home/en/datangtes/exp_plu.htmi. Race One race Native American Hawaiian Indian and Hispanic Black or and Other Two or White alone, Total African Alaska Pacific Some or more Latino (of not Hispanic Geographic area' population White American Native Asian Islander otherracel races any race) or Latino Michigan 9 938 444 7 966 053 1 412 742 58 479 176 510 2 692 129 552 192 416 323 877 7 806 691 Ann Arbor city 114 024 85 151 10 070 332 13 566 41 1 384 3 480 3 814 82 975 Detroit city 951 270 116 599 775 772 3 140 9 268 251 24 199 22 041 47 167 99 921 Flint city 124 943 51 710 66 560 798 547 19 1 384 3 925 3 742 50 020 Grand Rapids city 197 800 133 116 40 373 1 454 3 195 238 13 115 6 309 25 818 123 537 Lansing city 119 128 77 766 26 095 953 3 367 62 5 410 5 475 11 886 73 105 Livonia city 100 545 95 975 951 223 1 951 14 318 1 113 1 731 94 651 Sterling Heights city 124 471 112 899 1 614 260 6 123 45 418 3 112 1 665 111 743 Warren city 138 247 126 205 3 697 494 4 275 30 467 3 079 1 868 124 936 Minnesota 4 919 479 4 400 282 171 731 54 967 141 968 1 979 65 810 82 742 143 382 4 337 143 Minneapolis city 382 618 249 186 68 818 8378 23 455 289 15 798 16 694 29 175 239 080 St. Paul city 287 151 192 444 33 637 3 259 35 488 203 11 021 11 099 22 715 183 898 Mississippi 2 844 658 1 746 099 1 033 809 11 652 18 626 667 13 784 20 021 39 569 1 727 908 Jackson city 184 256 51 208 130 151 236 1 056 24 344 1 237 1 451 50 679 Missouri 5 595 211 4 748 083 629 391 25 076 61 595 3 178 45 827 82 061 118 592 4 686 474 Independence city 113 288 104 081 2 939 721 788 523 1 617 2 619 4 175 102 040 Kansas City city 441 545 267 931 137 879 2 122 8 182 493 14 158 10 780 30 604 254 471 St. Louis city 348 189 152 666 178 266 950 6 891 94 2 783 6 539 7 022 149 329 Springfield city 151 580 138 987 4 961 1 142 2060 136 1 332 2 962 3 501 137 140 Montana 902 195 817 229 2 692 56 068 4 691 470 5 315 15 730 18 081 807 823 Nebraska 1 711 263 1 533 261 68 541 14 896 21 931 836 47 845 23 953 94 425 1 494 494 Lincoln city 225 581 201 322 6 960 1 537 7 048 141 4 081 4 492 8 154 198 067 Omaha city 390 007 305 745 51 917 2 616 6 773 228 15 250 7 478 29 397 293 876 Nevada 1 998 257 1 501 886 135 477 26 420 90 266 8 426 159 354 76 428 393 970 1 303 001 Henderson city 175 381 148 181 6 590 1 236 6 983 728 5 549 6 114 18 785 137 174 Las Vegas city 478 434 334 230 49 570 3 570 22 879 2 145 46 643 19 397 112 962 277 704 North Las Vegas city 115 488 64 591 21 970 943 3 740 610 18 224 5 410 43 435 42 860 Paradise CDP' 186 070 134 927 12 260 1 424 12 135 1 097 15 568 8 659 43 663 111 017 Reno city 180 480 139 793 4 651 2 271 9 555 1 004 16 712 6 494 34 616 124 870 Spring Valley CDP' 117 390 85 224 6 214 701 13 164 567 6 036 5 484 16 165 76 766 Sunrise Manor CDP' 156 120 102 212 20 117 1 529 8 445 713 15 814 7 290 40 619 81 044 New Hampshire 1 235 786 1 186 851 9 035 2 964 15 931 371 7 420 13 214 20 489 1 175 252 Manchester city 107 006 98 178 2 246 326 2 487 38 1 880 1 851 4 944 95 581 New Jersey 8 414 350 6 104 705 1 141 821 19 492 480 276 3 329 450 972 213 755 1 117 191 5 557 209 Elizabeth city 120 568 67 250 24 090 580 2 830 55 18 702 7 061 59 627 32 338 Jersey City city 240 055 81 637 67 994 1 071 38 881 181 36 280 14 011 67 952 56 736 Newark city 273 546 72 537 146 250 1 005 3 263 135 38 430 11 926 80 622 38 950 Paterson city 149 222 45 913 49 095 901 2 831 84 41 184 9 214 74 774 19 765 New Mexico 1 819 046 1 214 253 34 343 173 483 19 255 1 503 309 882 66 327 765 386 813 495 Albuquerque city 448 607 321 179 13 854 17 444 10 068 452 66 292 19 318 179 075 223 895 New York 18 976 457 12 893 689 3 014 385 82 461 1 044 976 8 818 1 341 946 590 182 2 867 583 11 760 981 Buffalo city 292 648 159 300 106 951 2 250 4 093 120 10 755 7 179 22 076 151 450 New York city' 8 008 278 3 576 385 2 129 762 41 289 787 047 5 430 1 074 406 393 959 2 160 554 2 801 267 Bronx borough' 1 332 650 398 003 475 007 11 371 40 120 1 383 329 724 77 042 644 705 193 651 Brooklyn borough' 2 465 326 1 015 728 898 350 10 117 185 818 1 465 248 557 105 291 487 878 854 532 Manhattan borough' 1 537 195 835 610 267 302 7 617 144 538 1 069 217 383 63 676 417 816 703 873 Queens borough' 2 229 379 982 725 4461891 11 077 391 500 1 331 260 387 136 170 556 605 732 895 Staten Island borough' 443 728 344 319 429141 1 107 25 071 182 18 355 11 780 53 550 316 316 Rochester city 219 773 106 161 847171 1 033 4 943 104 14 452 8 363 28 032 97 395 Syracuse city 147 306 94 663 37 336 1 670 4 961 72 3 284 5 320 7 768 91 928 lonkers city 196 086 118 007 32 575 861 9 526 98 26 349 8 670 50 852 99 346 Census 2000 PHC-T-6. Population by Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin for the United States, Regions, Divisions, States, Puerto Rico, and Places of 100,000 or More Population Table 4. Population by Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin, for States, Puerto Rico, and Places of 100,000 or More Population: 2000 -Con. Source: U.S. Census Bureau Internet Release date: April 2, 2001 NOTE: Data not adjusted based on the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, see http://facffinder.census.gov/home/enldatanotes/expplu.html. Race One race Native American Hawaiian Indian and Hispanic Black or and Other Two or White alone, Total African Alaska Pacific Some or more Latino (of not Hispanic Geographic area' population White American Native Asian Islander other race races any race) or Latino North Carolina 8 049 313 5 804 656 1 737 545 99 551 113 689 3 983 186 629 103 260 378 963 5 647 155 Charlotte city 540 828 315 061 176 964 1 863 18 418 283 19 242 8 997 39 800 297 845 Durham city 187 035 85 126 81 937 575 6 815 71 8 875 3 636 16 012 79 277 Fayetteville city 121 015 59 007 51 338 1 331 2 653 264 3 062 3 360 6 862 56 419 Greensboro city 223 891 124 243 83 728 989 6 357 89 4 647 3 838 9 742 120 112 Raleigh city 276 093 174 786 76 756 981 9 327 118 8 946 5 179 19 308 166 386 Winston-Salem city 185 776 103 243 68 924 567 2 108 67 7 965 2 902 16 043 97 420 North Dakota 642 200 593 181 3 916 31 329 3 606 230 2 540 7 398 7 786 589 149 Ohio 11 353 140 9 645 453 1 301 307 24 486 132 633 2 749 88 627 157 885 217 123 9 538 111 Akron city 217 074 145 924 61 827 575 3 257 48 940 4 503 2 513 144 719 Cincinnati city 331 285 175 492 142 176 709 5 132 130 2093 5 553 4 230 173 781 Cleveland city 478 403 198 510 243 939 1 458 6 444 176 17 173 10 701 34 728 185 641 Columbus city 711 470 483 332 174 065 2090 24 495 367 8 292 18 829 17 471 475 897 Dayton city 166 179 88 676 71 668 500 1 075 63 1 160 3 037 2 626 87 487 Toledo city 313 619 220 261 73 854 970 3 233 76 7 166 8 059 17 141 212 658 Oklahoma 3 450 654 2 628 434 260 968 273 230 46 767 2 372 82 898 155 985 179 304 2 556 368 Oklahoma City city 506 132 346 226 77 810 17 743 17 595 360 26 705 19 693 51 368 327 225 Tulsa city 393 049 275 488 60 794 18 551 7 150 202 13 564 17 300 28 111 263 782 Oregon 3 421 399 2 961 623 55 662 45 211 101 350 7 976 144 832 104 745 275 314 2 857 616 Eugene city 137 893 121 546 1 729 1 281 4 916 294 3 003 5 124 6 843 118 563 Portland city 529 121 412 241 35 115 5 567 33 470 1 993 18 760 21 955 36 058 399 351 Salem city 136 924 113 746 1 750 2064 3 304 643 10 820 4 597 19 973 106 331 Pennsylvania 12 281 054 10 484 203 1 224 612 18 348 219 813 3 417 188 437 142 224 394 088 10 322 455 Allentown city 106 632 77 361 8 370 356 2 421 78 14 260 3 786 26 058 68 621 Erie city 103 717 83 550 14 724 232 776 42 1 991 2 402 4 572 81 605 Philadelphia city 1 517 550 683 267 655 824 4 073 67 654 729 72 429 33 574 128 928 644 395 Pittsburgh city 334 563 226 256 90 750 628 9 195 111 2 218 5 403 4 425 223 982 Rhode Island 1 048 319 891 191 46 908 5 121 23 665 567 52 616 28 251 90 820 858 433 Providence city 173 618 94 666 25 243 1 975 10 432 270 30 477 10 555 52 146 79 451 South Carolina 4 012 012 2 695 560 1 185 216 13 718 36 014 1 628 39 926 39 950 95 076 2 652 291 Columbia city 116 278 57 236 53 465 296 2008 104 1 582 1 587 3 520 55 993 South Dakota 754 844 669 404 4 685 62 283 4 378 261 3 677 10 156 10 903 664 585 Sioux Falls city 123 975 113 938 2 226 2 627 1 479 68 1 521 2 116 3 087 112 703 Tennessee 5 689 283 4 563 310 932 809 15 152 56 662 2205 56 036 63 109 123 838 4505 930 Chattanooga city 155 554 92 874 56 086 446 2 396 164 1 571 2017 3 281 91 582 Clarksville city 103 455 70 254 24 030 560 2 233 262 2 705 3 411 6 241 67 562 <noxville city 173 890 138 611 28 171 541 2 525 60 1 257 2 725 2 751 137 336 Vlemphis city 650 100 223 728 399 208 1 217 9 482 239 9 438 6 788 19 317 216 174 �lashville-Davidson' 569 891 381 783 147696 1 679 13 275 403 13 816 11 239 26 091 371 150 Texas 20 851 820 14 799 505 2 404 566 118 362 562 319 14 434 2 438 001 514 633 6 669 666 10 933 313 Abilene city 115 930 90 502 10 215 642 1 543 81 10 117 2 830 22 548 79 712 Amarillo city 173 627 134 563 10 358 1 346 3 563 64 19 663 4 070 37 947 118 821 Arlington city 332 969 225 379 45 727 1 817 20 015 475 29 763 9 793 60 817 198 591 Austin city 656 562 429 100 65 956 3 889 30 960 469 106 538 19 650 200 579 347 554 3eaumont city 113 866 52 826 52 206 269 2 827 46 4 038 1 654 9 028 48 595 3rownsville city 139 722 114 083 575 580 752 46 20 486 3200 127 535 10 826 ;arrollton city 109 576 78 758 6 862 503 11 944 75 8 451 2 983 21 400 67 078 ;orpus Christi city 277 454 198 714 12 969 1 766 3 551 212 51 552 8 690 150 737 106 901 )allas city 1 188 580 604 209 307 957 6 472 32 118 590 204 883 32 351 422 587 410 777 31 Paso city 563 662 413 061 17 586 4 601 6 321 583 102 320 19 190 431 875 103 422 :on Worth city 534 694 319 159 108 310 3 144 14 105 341 75 100 14 535 159 368 244 966 3arland city 215 766 140 835 25 609 1 284 15 806 141 25 862 6 231 55 192 114 985 ;rand Prairie city 127 427 78 970 17 242 962 5 632 74 20 265 4 262 42 038 60 118 iouston city 1 953 631 962,510 494 496 8 568 103 694 1 182 321 603 61 478 730 865 601 851 ving city 191 615 123 019 195831 1 2441 15 784 248 25 608 6 129 59 838 92 445 Census 2000 PHC-T-6. Population by Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin for the United States, Regions, Divisions, Slates, Puerto Rico, and Places of 100,000 or More Population Table 4. Population by Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin, for States, Puerto Rico, and Places of 100,000 or More Population: 2000 -Con. Source: U.S. Census Bureau Internet Release date: April 2, 2001 NOTE: Data not adjusted based on the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, see http://factfiinder.census.goWhome/en/datanotes/ex0plu.html. In the United Stales, there are 245 places with 100,000 or more population. These places include 234 incorporated places (232 cities, 1 municipality, and 1 town), 4 city -county consolidations with the county name included as part of the place name (Athens -Clarke County, GA; Augusta -Richmond County, GA; Lexington -Fayette, KY; and Nashville -Davidson, TN), and 7 census designated places (CDPs). CDPs are delineated for the decennial census and comprise densely settled concentrations of population which are identifiable by name, but which are not legally incorporated places. One of these CDPs is Arlington CDP, VA, which is coextensive with Arlington County. In Puerto Rico, there are 4 places with 100,000 or more population, all of which are CDPs identified as zonas urbanas, There are no incorporated places in Hawaii or Puerto Rico. The 5 boroughs of New York city are coextensive with the 5 counties that constitute New York city: Bronx borough (Bronx County), Brooklyn borough (Kings County), Manhattan borough (New York County), Queens borough (Queens County), and Staten Island borough (Richmond County). Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Redistricting Data (P.L. 94-171) Summary File for states and Census 2000 Redistricting Summary File for Puerto Rico, Tables PL1 and PL2. Race One race Native American Hawaiian Indian and Hispanic Black or and Other Two or White alone, Total African Alaska Pacific Some or more Latino (of not Hispanic Geographic area' population White American Native Asian Islander other race races any race) or Latino Texas -con. Laredo city 176 576 145 267 652 784 820 47 24 611 4 395 166 216 8 891 Lubbock city 199 564 145 426 17 292 1 118 3 078 65 28 571 4 014 54 786 122 330 McAllen city 106 414 83 491 647 429 2059 41 16 864 2 883 85 427 17 924 Mesquite city 124 523 91 572 16 585 750 4 665 65 8 009 2 877 19 500 81 388 Pasadena city 141 674 101 219 2 316 957 2 589 58 30 173 4 362 68 348 66 923 Plano city 222 030 173 761 11 155 803 22 594 98 8 565 5 054 22 357 161 543 San Antonio city 1 144 646 774 708 78 120 9 584 17 934 1 067 221 362 41 871 671 394 364 357 Waco city 113 726 69 119 25 754 576 1 567 61 14 084 2 565 26 885 58 096 Wichita Falls city 104 197 78 258 12 920 897 2 288 103 6 656 3 075 14 570 71 782 Utah 2 233 169 1 992 975 17 657 29 684 37 108 15 145 93 405 47 195 201 559 1 904 265 Provo city 105 166 93 094 486 846 1 924 882 5 368 2 566 11 013 88 311 Salt Lake City city 181 743 143 933 3 433 2 442 6 579 3 437 15 482 6 437 34 254 128 377 West Valley City city 108 896 85 172 1 247 1 273 4 671 3 157 9 528 3 848 20 126 76 545 Vermont 608 827 589 208 3 063 2 420 5 217 141 1 443 7 335 5 504 585 431 Virginia 7 078 515 5 120 110 1 390 293 21 172 261 025 3 946 138 900 143 069 329 540 4 965 637 Alexandria city 128 283 76 702 28 915 355 7 249 112 9 467 5 483 18 882 68 689 Arlington CDP' 189 453 130 601 17 705 662 16 327 143 15 786 8 229 35 268 114 489 Chesapeake city 199 184 133 193 56 823 770 3 673 101 1 400 3 224 4 076 131 200 Hampton city 146 437 72 556 65 428 616 2 694 136 1 505 3 502 4 153 70 963 Newport News city 180 150 96 383 70 388 752 4 195 214 3 225 4 993 7 595 93 624 Norfolk city 234 403 113 358 103 387 1 071 6 593 251 3 923 5 820 8 915 110 221 Portsmouth city 100 565 46 096 50 899 478 775 67 618 1 632 1 748 45 403 Richmond city 197 790 75 744 113 108 479 2 471 157 2 948 2 883 5 074 74 506 Virginia Beach city 425 257 303 681 80 593 1 619 20 869 416 6 402 11 677 17 770 295 402 Washington 5 894 121 4 821 823 190 267 93 301 322 335 23 953 228 923 213 519 441 509 4 652 490 Bellevue city 109 569 81 441 2 183 356 19 056 257 2 785 3 491 5 827 78 698 Seattle city 563 374 394 889 47 541 5 659 73 910 2 804 13 423 25 148 29 719 382 532 Spokane city 195 629 175 018 4 052 3 444 4 399 372 1 727 6 617 5 857 171 918 Tacoma city 193 556 133 704 21 757 3 794 14 656 1 798 5 695 12 152 13 262 128 696 Vancouver city 143 560 121 752 3 593 1 399 6 470 779 4 112 5 455 9 035 117 958 West Virignia 1 808 344 1 718 777 57 232 3 606 9 434 400 3 107 15 788 12 279 1 709 966 Wisconsin 5 363 675 4 769 857 304 460 47 228 88 763 1 630 84 842 66 895 192 921 4 681 630 Green Bay city 102 313 87 841 1 407 3 355 3 845 36 3 809 2020 7 294 85 134 Madison city 208 054 174 689 12 155 759 12 065 77 3 474 4 835 8 512 170 509 Milwaukee city 596 974 298 379 222 933 5 212 17 571 301 36 428 16 150 71 646 270 989 Wyoming 493 782 454 670 3 722 11 133 2 771 302 12 301 8 883 31 669 438 799 Puerto Rico 3 808 610 3 064 862 302 933 13 336 7 960 1 093 260 011 158 415 3 762 746 33 966 Bayamon zona urbana' 203 499 172 459 12 251 580 462 54 7 707 9 986 200 742 2005 Carolina zona urbane' 168 164 115 713 28 588 810 536 60 15 984 6 473 165 334 2049 Ponce zona urbane' 155 038 129 878 8 291 464 229135 7 879 8 162 153 379 1 202 San Juan zona urbana' 421 958 306 603 50 102 2204 2 002 133 38 254 22 660 413 328 5 899 In the United Stales, there are 245 places with 100,000 or more population. These places include 234 incorporated places (232 cities, 1 municipality, and 1 town), 4 city -county consolidations with the county name included as part of the place name (Athens -Clarke County, GA; Augusta -Richmond County, GA; Lexington -Fayette, KY; and Nashville -Davidson, TN), and 7 census designated places (CDPs). CDPs are delineated for the decennial census and comprise densely settled concentrations of population which are identifiable by name, but which are not legally incorporated places. One of these CDPs is Arlington CDP, VA, which is coextensive with Arlington County. In Puerto Rico, there are 4 places with 100,000 or more population, all of which are CDPs identified as zonas urbanas, There are no incorporated places in Hawaii or Puerto Rico. The 5 boroughs of New York city are coextensive with the 5 counties that constitute New York city: Bronx borough (Bronx County), Brooklyn borough (Kings County), Manhattan borough (New York County), Queens borough (Queens County), and Staten Island borough (Richmond County). Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Redistricting Data (P.L. 94-171) Summary File for states and Census 2000 Redistricting Summary File for Puerto Rico, Tables PL1 and PL2. vd %.o � o ti m O > Na p _o 0 U U 0 -L y CD Ln T 3 o u a T N ° T �V1 w _O O O O p Ce) LO Lo v F as t o e d O o O O: m Ln O M ° N� -1 O O LD vd O � o Q `- 3Co O O O CD 04 � I CO pa p Quincy Ln U y CD Ln o u a �V1 w O O = F as t o e d ' o OC0 M ° N� O O TO O O N N w,. N K i Richmond St < 7 oo (auolow O oo v g ° NCD o v N v° 3 C) UQIUAV—fo noe)CD N O O C:) N _yIS Op �U O N p N > ? ° O �2 a' o Viking Rd N N • V/\ RJ' o` O 1S uJD4b(il l U0 Ingham St = woy6ul c Q Co M N N N� m o o m C O O ° N p 0 n O u N o p N p N O N p N a 7 N = U 2 ? ' N C) all rc C) p o o S Deerfield Pve''' oAveN o N o p O M NOU1 n o 0 N N Cl) AV r O m ainwright Ave 146iiru, oM Norwich Rdcl7 00 _ N o —@AV pJo}}DJ}S t� O r N m Cl) n O o > NPu0I1a4S Cl)` ■ o0 N MCl) 0 O r .� c o, U a O `- Lowdor Y °i a N ',y' a = ( Atla a F O o o U SOL Rd o° o o 4°Jn4D M �(OfOJpB tf7 c 'a r' c C� p O Pa pa puplJapuns > N Stillwell Ave m d O Y p o O Hillborn LnN a O T cCD t0cn O O N r _ o ^ o N Berwick Dr ul N O O v O y O o m N N >O 5 U O UOS? G` O N o �' Averill Dr o JQ pooMlppu@A p p� r o O N o o m o o ° o Wedgewood Dr K o r ` o p NJQ E M E ° LO o DJog cpa o 0 0 N¢ u S ro U C) O J O ac�.n o Continent°� N O v A a UJOg%Dl� w� O Co S Waverly Rd g o N INGHAM 065 Pa (IJanDM s EATON 04 4 v o> y LO PI as nt A, o e d N¢ OJp 0 puDlioW p r r� L C) O f` O in � O C) M o LOE v > Q 0 _ 'd � T T O 01 T N o T M L7 L v O o O [if M In o CD �(auoloy� O O D n �O N CO CD Quincy Ln CD O LO v N rr `— O CO 0 � a LO PI as nt A, o e d c OJp puDlioW p O r� L O O f` O in 00 O C) M o a UV v > Q 0 _ � a T O � a LO PI as nt A, o e d c O p O O O O f` O 00 O O N M o W,� CO 0 � a Cl) I M _ xv AVIS LO PI as nt A, o e d f` O 00 O O LO CD O M o W,� CO - O O CD N N O N o_ N v Richmond St ¢> CD �(auoloy� v M O r o N o N CO OT CD O m v o N rr `— CO I O ° N 3 u l G� M o p O f O N O O 's O p, N O N n Q O Q' o o Viking Rd N N c a L w°4b�1Q > 0 CDs O S v L ` Ingham St =m dc " CO M m 00 O m O p O}SO O OO NNn O'n N CN ' 0 pall O rc O O o p C) S Deerfield N F� e v o AveN O O o p 0 Nn O Cl) n r N N Cl) any CO ainwright Ave Norwich RdM p N c� Mo —AV pyo}}D�}S Tom O N p a of Cl) ro O of N— NpuDl}agS MO N O /A N O Cl) Atla m 0 o ao p M o v a Lowder D Y rn a s y y//iyomqQ a = M bop F °8 NO c Rd o o` o Oo c ti N Stillwell Ave pb puoljapunS _ m` v of O Y p O J O Hillborn LnN O 04 N T o C 1\ F , O N o n N l Berwick Dr ul N O p O p O N N > j sc7 � c O O uoslr l� of v 7C O v7 caAverill o Dr C pooMlDpua� o O� r` Op N C) C\lM 0 o o o Wedgewood Dr' o rte° M y o N $ E Ln �4 M o u oq (oa rn O Cl) ° I� O •a 0 0� N a E is O — N O o o:n 0 \ Ot N ContinentO p v O b oo pa ujogbDIO M S Waverly Rd N INGHAM 065 x Pa Tan°M s EATON 0 4 W -f-+ Ca c W m c co W U) 0 �r ^0 W U) U) Q U) U M m GUIDE-11NE 13 :f a city or township line is broken, the number of people necessary to achieve population equality between the two election districts effected by the break shall be shifted, except that in lieu of absolute equality the lines may be drawn along the closest street or comparable boundary. If there are competing plans, preference is given to that plan which shifts the necessary number of people but is most compact (compactness formula is dis- cussed in a later guideline). GUIDELTNE 14 Where competing plans have the same number of county line breaks, the plan shifting the fewest cities and townships statewide shall be selected. If competing plans contain the same number of county line breaks and shift the same number of cities and townships state- wide, the plan that shifts the fewest people in the aggregate state - shall be selected. -GUIDELINE 15 Between competing plans which have the same number of city and townships breaks within a particular county, the plan which mini- mizes_the population divergence in districts across the county is to be selected. GUIDELINE '154 Compactness sha l h -. be ' determ:i-ned by ci rcumscri bi ng each di stri C+,-` within a -circ -le of. minimum, -radius and measuring the :area,. nckt Part of the Great Lakes, and_not part of another state, insider thee:circle, but notA nside the distridt.-.The=pl:an which is most compact istheplan with the least area within all the circles 9;ot:within the.district d rcumscribed by the circld. (Compact- t)ES-S is- discussed in the opinion of t -he; court; Pp`.;126=:135 . .2 The City Council may require bonds from other officers and employees. .3 Ali bonds shall be approved by the City Attorney and filed with the City Clerk. 2-106 OATH OF OFFICE: Every elective officer and every appointee before entering on official duties shall take and subscribe the following oath: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of this Stale and that I will faithfully discharge ft office of , according to the best of my ability' and shall file that oath, duly certified by the officer before whom It was taken, in the office of the City Clerk. Chapter 2. ELECTION OF OFFICERS 2-201 TIME OF ELECTIONS: The primary and general elections for all City offices shall be at the time provided by State law. 2-202 NON-PARTISAN BALLOT: The Clerk shall prepare ballots which shall conform to the provisions of law. No party vignette or emblem or other designation shall appear on the ballot In regard to Clty officers. 2-203 WARDS: .1 The City of Lansing shall be divided Into four wards, from each of which a member of the City Council shall be nominated and elected. .2 Each ward shall have the same boundaries as shall exist on the effective date of this Charter until changed in accord with law. .3 The Election Commission shall revise the boundaries of the wards within 60 days after the figures from the Federal decennial census become available. New ward boundaries created within 120 days of a City primary election shall become effective after the general election. .4 The Election Commission shall, to the greatest extent possible, establish wards that are compact, contiguous and of equal population. 2-204 METHOD OF NOMINATION: .1 The method of nomination for all elective offices In the City shall be by petition, or by a candidate submitting a filing fee. A primary election shall be held on those occasions when the number of persons submitting valid nominating petitions or filing fees exceeds twice the number of positions to be filled in the office. .2 Nominating petitions submitted by candidates for offices to be filled by voters of a ward shall be signed by at least one hundred (100), but no more than one hundred fifty (150), of the persons registered to vote in the ward in which the election is to be held. .3 Nominating petitions submitted by candidates for offices to, be filled by the voters of the City at large shall be signed by at least four hundred (400), but no more than six hundred (600), of the registered electors of the City. .4 In lieu of submitting nominating petitions, a candidate may nominate himself or herself for City office by submitting a filing fee of one hundred dollars ($100.00). The filing fee shall be nonrefundable. .5 The City Clerk shall assist members of the public by providing Information regarding the requirements for candidacy, and In the preparation of petitions. .6 Neither nominating petitions, nor filing fees shall be accepted unless accompanied by an affidavit swom to or affirmed by the candidate, stating that the candidate possesses the legal qualifications for the office and requesting that the candidate's name be printed on the ballot 2-205 ELECTION COMMISSION: .1 The conduct of City elections shall be the responsibility of the Election Commission consisting of the City Clerk, the City Attorney and the Assessor. The City Clerk shall preside. .2 The Election Commission shall prescribe the procedures to be followed in the conduct of City elections In accord with state law. 2-206 STATE LAW TO APPLY: The general election laws of the state as supplemented by the provisions of this Charter and relevant ordinances shall apply to the qualifications and registration of voters, the filing for office bycandidates, and the conduct and canvass of City elections. Chapter 3 VACANCIES 2-301 ABSENCE FROM OFFICE: Whenever an elective officer of the City has failed to perform the duties of the office for 60 consecutive days or more, the Council shall vote to excuse or not to excuse the Inability at each Council meeting until the officer resumes the duties of the office. If the Council does not excuse the Inability at any meeting, after the 60 days have lapsed, the office shall be forfeited at the close of the meeting. 2-302 FORFEITURE AND REMOVAL FOR CAUSE: .1 The City Council shall declare the forfeiture of the office of any elective officer or appointee and may remove for cause any person appointed to an office for a fixed term. In every case there shall be a public hearing before the City Council with notice published In the same manner as notices of proposed ordinances. A Council member charged with conduct constituting grounds for forfeiture may not participate in the resolution of the charge. .2 The position of an elective City officer or an appointee shall be forfeited if he or she: (a) lacks at any time any qualifications required by this Charter. (b) is convicted of a felony while holding the office or appointment. (c) violates a provision of this Charter punishable by forfeiture. ELECTION PRECINCTS 168.654 Election precincts; definition. Sec. 654. The words "election precinct" as used in this act shall mean a political subdivision, the area of which is embraced in its entirety within the confines of a city, ward, township or village, and for which not more than 1 polling place is provided for all qualified and registered electors residing therein. When not divided according to law into 2 or more election precincts, each organized city, ward, township and village shall be an election precinct. History: 1954, Act 116, Eff. June 1, 1955. 168.655 Election precincts; time periods; outer boundaries; division or consolidation. Sec. 655. (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this act, the outer boundaries of election precincts as established pursuant to this act for the 1988 general November election and the primary election next preceding the 1988 general November election shall remain as established at that time through the 1992 general November election, except as permitted in subsections (2) and (3). (2) An election precinct may be divided or 2 or more contiguous election precincts may be consolidated as long as the outer boundaries are not altered during the time period mentioned above. (3) Election precincts shall be divided, consolidated, or established within 30 days after the effective date of congressional, legislative, or county commissioner reapportionment plans. History: 1954, Act 116, Eff. June 1, 1955;—Am. 1987, Act 226, Imd. Eff. Dec. 28, 1987. 168.656 Division of precincts. Sec. 656. (1) A city, ward, township, or village using paper ballots, having less than 400 registered voters, which constitutes a single election precinct, in the discretion of the election commission, or other officials charged with the performance of the duty by the charter of the city or village, may be divided into 2 or more election precincts. In a township, upon a petition signed by not less than 25 qualified electors of the township showing the boundaries of the proposed election precincts, the township board shall submit to the electors of the township, at the next election held in the township, the question of the division of the township into election precincts, as set forth in the petition. If, at the referendum, the electors of the township decide in favor of the division of the township into such election precincts, the township board shall thereupon make the division and enter the same of record in the proceedings of the township board. When in a township, city, ward, or village, or in an election precinct therein, using paper _ ballots, there is 400 or more registered electors, the election commission of the township or city, or other officials charged with the performance of the duty by the charter of the city or village, shall by resolution divide the precincts into 2 or more precincts, or shall again divide the township, city, ward, or village into election precincts, so that there shall not be more than 400 registered electors in any 1 precinct. 2'10 .(2) Except as provided in subsection (3), city and township election commissions shall divide precincts according to law, not later than 210 days before the primary next preceding the general November election, and shall immediately notify the county clerk of the number of registered voters in each precinct in such city or township. The county clerk shall notify the secretary of state not later than 200 days before the primary of any precincts in his or her county which have not been divided according to law, and the secretary of state shall proceed to make the divisions as are necessary at the expense of the city or township involved, not later than 180 days. before the primary next preceding the general November election. The division of precincts shall be made effective not later than 180 days before the primary election next preceding the general November election. (3) In the second year following each federal census, precincts shall be divided pursuant to this subsection. City and township election commissions shall divide precincts, not later than 120 days before the primary election next preceding the general November election in order that a precinct, as far as is practical, is not split between districts and does not exceed 400 registered voters, and the commissions shall immediately notify the county clerk of the number of registered voters in each precinct in each city or township. The county clerk shall notify the secretary of state not later than 110 days before the primary of any precincts in the county which have not been divided, and the secretary of state shall proceed to make the divisions as are necessary at the expense of the city or township involved, not later than 90 days before the primary election. The division of precincts shall be made effective not later than 90 days before the primary election next preceding the general November election. The secretary of state may authorize, upon written request by a city or township election commission, a later division of a precinct which contains portions of more than 1 elective district. All precinct divisions under this subsection shall be completed not later than 90 days before the primary election next preceding the general November election. History: 1954, Act 116, Eff. June 1, 1955;—Am. 1955, Act 271, lmd. Eff. June 30, 1955;—Am. 1969, Act 290, Imd. Eff. Aug. 11, 1969;—Am. 1975, Act 325, Imd. Eff. Jan. 9, 1976;—Am. 1982, Act 2, lmd. Eff. Jan. 27, 1982. 168.657 Election precincts; division, rearrangement. Sec. 657. When any city, ward, township or village has been divided into 2 or more election precincts, the election commission, or other officials charged with the performance of such duty by the charter of any city or village, as the case may be, may by resolution divide any precinct thereof into 2 or more precincts, attach a portion of any precinct to an adjoining precinct, or may again rearrange the city, ward, township or village into election precincts as said election commission or other officials charged with the performance of such duty by the charter of any city or village, may deem necessary and convenient for conducting primaries or elections in said city, ward, township or village, in the same manner and under the same restric- tions as provided in sections 656 and 661 of this act. History: 1954, Act 116, Eff. June 1, 1955;—Am. 1955, Act 271, lmd. Eff. June 30, 1955. 211 168.658 Election precincts; consolidation. Sec. 658. When a city, ward, township, or village is divided into 2 or more election precincts, pursuant to law, and it appears from an examination of the precinct registration records, that there are not more than 400 registered electors in the city, ward, township, or village using paper ballots, or not more than 2,999 registered electors in the city, ward, township, or village using voting machines, the election commission, or other officials charged with the performance of the duty by the charter of a city or village, by resolution, may abolish the division or divisions and after that time the city, ward, township, or village shall constitute a single election precinct as if a division had not been made. A consolidation shall not be made later than the 120 days before a primary or election. History: 1954, Act 116, Eff. June 1, 1955;—Am. 1955, Act 271, Imd. Eff. June 30, 1955;—Am. 1969, Act 290, Imd. Eff. Aug. 11, 1969;—Am. 1977, Act 236, Imd. Eff. Nov. 30, 1977. 168.660 Subdivision, alteration, or rearrangement of precincts; record; numbers of precincts; description of boundaries; notice; abolition of division into precincts. Sec. 660. When a city, ward, township, or village is subdivided into election precincts, or the clection precincts are altered or rearranged, the city, township, or village election commission, or other officials charged with the performance of the duty by the charter of the city or village, shall enter that action of record in its proceedings, specify the numbers of the precincts altered or rearranged in numerical order, and describe the boundaries of each precinct.. Notice of the subdivision, alteration, or rearrangement shall be given immediately by the city, township, or village clerk. The notification shall be effected by mailing to each qualified and registered elector affected by the subdivision, alteration, or rearrangement a notice by first class letter postage advising the location of his new polling place and, if deemed advisable by the city, township, or village election commission, by posting a public notice of the change in 2 places in each precinct affected thereby, advising the boundaries of each of the precincts. A notice shall also be immediately transmitted to the county clerk, and the county clerk shall transmit to the secretary of state, not later than 200 days prior to the primary next preceding the general November election, the number of election precincts in his county. The city, township, or village clerk shall give like notice of the abolition of the division of a city, ward, township, or village into election precincts, and shall, in the notice of abolition, state that the city, ward, township, or village is restored as a single election precinct and indicate the location of the polling place therein. Notice of the abolition shall be immediately transmitted to the county clerk, and by him to the secretary of state, as in the case of the subdivision or alteration of boundaries as herein provided. History: 1954, Act 116, Eff. June 1, 1955;—Am. 1955, Act 271, Imd. Eff. June 30, 1955;—Am. 1975, Act 325, Imd. Eff. Jan. 9, 1976. 212 213 168.661 Precincts using voting machines; number of machines; division or rearrange- ment of precincts; notices; expenses; use of paper ballots; time limitations on division of precincts; division of precincts following federal census. Sec. 661. (1) When the voter registration in a precinct using voting machines is 1,000 or less, there shall be not less than 1 voting machine for each 500 active registered electors at the general November election and at the primary immediately preceding that election. When the registration in a precinct using voting machines is more than 1,000 and less than 3,000, there shall be at least 1 voting machine for each 600 active registered electors at the general November election and at the primary immediately preceding that election. At other primaries and elections, the number of voting machines shall be at the discretion of the local election commission. In making this determination, the local election commission shall take into consider- ation the number of choices the voter must make, the percentage of registered voters who voted at the last similar election in the jurisdiction, and the intensity of the interest of the electors in the jurisdiction concerning the candidates and proposals to be voted upon. When the registration in a precinct using voting machines exceeds 2,999, the precinct shall be divided or rearranged. (2) Except as provided in subsection (3), city and township election commissions shall divide precincts according to law, not later than 210 days before the primary next preceding the general November election, and shall immediately notify the county clerk of the number of registered voters in each precinct in the city or township. The county clerk shall notify the secretary of state not later than 200 days before the primary of a precinct in the clerk's county which has not been divided according to law, and the secretary of state shall proceed to make divisions as are necessary at the expense of the city or township involved, not later than 180 days before the primary next preceding the general November election. If the election commission of a city, village, or township using voting machines decides to use paper ballots for a primary or election, the preceding limitations shall continue for that election. A division of precincts shall be made effective not later than 180 days before the primary election next preceding the general November election. (3) In the second year following each federal census, precincts shall be divided pursuant to this subsection. City and township election commissions shall divide precincts, not later than 120 days before the primary election next preceding the general November election in order that a precinct, as far -as is practical, is not split between districts and does not exceed 2,999 registered voters, and shall immediately notify the county clerk of the number of registered voters in each precinct in each city or township. The county clerk shall notify the secretary of state not later than 110 days before the primary of any precincts in the county which have not been divided, and the secretary of state shall proceed to make the divisions as are necessary at the expense of the city or township involved, not later than 90 days before the primary election next preceding the general November election. The division of precincts shall be made effective not later than 90 days before the primary election. The secretary of state may authorize, upon written request by a city or township election commission, a later division of a precinct which contains portions of more than 1 elective district. All precinct divisions shall be completed not later than 90 days before the primary election next preceding the general November election. q c �°1 �����. c� Mf�Y & 4{ HOME RULE CITIES 117.27 Repealed. 1966, p. 361, Act 261, Eff. Mar.10, 1967. Compiler's note: The repealed section pertained to determination of representation by cities on county hoard of supervisors. 1-1 .1.27a Apportionment of wards; definitions. Sec. 27a. (1) For the purposes of this section: (a) "Local legislative body" means the council, common council or commission of a city. (b) "Ward" means a district comprising less than all of the area of a city which constitutes the political unit from which 1 or more members of the local legislative body is nominated, elected or nominated and elected. (2) The population of each city subject to the provisions of this section shall, in the first instance, be determined from the most recent official United States decennial census. Other governmental census figures of total city population may ken subsequent to the latest decennial United States census and the last decennial United ted States census figures are inadequate for the purposes of this section. Each city shall have the power to conduct its own census for this purpose. (3) This section shall be applicable to all cities that do not elect all the members of their local legislative body at large. This section shall not repeal any charter provisions meeting the standards established herein but shall be applicable to all charters that fail in whole or in part, to meet the standards herein, or the constitutional requirements of this state or United States constitution. -o- �• —;11 united states decennia census, shall wards of the city in accord with this section. apportion the ._ (5) The local legislative body shall file the apportionment plan with the city clerk and make copies available at cost to any registered voter of the city. Such plan shall provide for wards which are as nearly of equal population as is practicable and contiguous and compact. Residents of state institutions who cannot by law register in the city as electors shall be excluded from population computations where the number of such persons is identifiable in the census figures available. (6) Any registered voter of the city within 30 days after the filing of the apportionment plan for his city, or within 30 days after such apportionment plan shall be submitted, may petition the circuit court to determine if the plan meets the requirements of the laws and constitution of this state and the rr,,;t.a.l C.— History: Add. I98F ., one . -- - . 1754 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [July 12, 2001] [No. 60 Pine Grove twp Porter twp South Haven city (part) TRACT 010300 including block(s) 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032, 1033, 1034, 1035, 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1042, 1043, 1044, 1045, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017, 3018, 3019, 3020, 3021, 3022, 3023, 3024, 3025, 3999. TRACT 010400 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2032, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017, 3018, 3019, 3020, 3023, 3024, 3025, 3026, 3027, 3028, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, 4010, 4012, 4013, 4014, 4015, 4016, 4018, 4019. TRACT 010500 including block(s) 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3011, 3015, 3016, 3021, 3022, 3023, 3024, 3029, 3032, 3037. South Haven twp Waverly twp DISTRICT 22 Ingham County (part) Bunker Hill twp Leslie city Leslie twp Mason city Stockbridge twp Vevay twp Livingston County Shiawassee County DISTRICT 23 Ingham County (part) Alaiedon twp Aurelius twp Delhi Charter twp East Lansing city (part) TRACT 002901 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1011. TRACT 003801 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2014, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2027. TRACT 003802 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 9000, 9001, 9002, 9003, 9004, 9005, 9006, 9007, 9008, 9009, 9010, 9011, 9014, 9015, 9016. TRACT 003901 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031. TRACT 003902 including block(s) 1000, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017. TRACT 004000 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017, 3018, 3019, 3020, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, 4010, 4011, 4012, 4013, 4014, 4015, 4016, 4017, 4018, 4019, 4020. No. 60] [July 12, 2001] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 1755 TRACT 004100 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, 4010, 4011, 4012, 4013, 4014. TRACT 004200 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009. TRACT 004301 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1011, 1012, 1013, 2001, 2002, 2011, 2012, 2013, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, 4010, 4011, 4012, 4013, 4014, 4015, 4016, 4017, 4018, 4019, 4020, 4021, 4022, 4023. TRACT 004302 including block(s) 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008. TRACT 004402 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008. TRACT 004403 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006. TRACT 004404 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1037, 1046, 1047. TRACT 004405 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008. TRACT 004500 including block(s) 1000. TRACT 004600 including block(s) 9028, 9029, 9030, 9031, 9032, 9033. Ingham twp Lansing city (part) TRACT 000100 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027. TRACT 000200 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030, 2031, 2032, 2033. TRACT 000300 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006. TRACT 000400 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, 4010, 4011, 4012, 4013, 4014, 4015, 4016, 4017, 4018, 4019, 4020, 4021, 4022, 4023, 4024, 4025, 4026, 4027, 4028, 4029, 4030, 4031, 4032, 4033, 4034, 4035. TRACT 000500 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010. TRACT 000600 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011. TRACT 000700 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011. No. 60] [July 12, 2001] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 1757 TRACT 002300 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017, 3018, 3019, 3020, 3021, 3022, 3023, 3024, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, 4010, 4011, 4012, 4013, 4014, 4015, 4016. TRACT 002400 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030, 2031, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016. TRACT 002500 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017, 3018, 3019. TRACT 002600 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013. TRACT 002700 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014. TRACT 002800 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017, 3018, 3019, 3020, 3021, 3022, 3023, 3024. TRACT 002901 including block(s) 1005, 1010, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2999. TRACT 002902 including block(s) 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2999. TRACT 003101 including block(s) 1000, 1027, 1028, 1037, 1038. TRACT 003102 including block(s) 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1033, 1034, 1036, 1037, 1045, 1046, 1048, 1049. TRACT 003200 including block(s) 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010. TRACT 003301 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026. TRACT 003302 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022. TRACT 003400 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1004, 1007, 1008, 2000. TRACT 003500 including block(s) 1001, 2000, 2014, 2015, 2016. TRACT 003601 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014. 1758 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [July 12, 2001] [No. 60 TRACT 003602 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019. TRACT 003700 including blo.ck(s). . 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 5000, 5001, 5002, 5003, 5004, 5005, 5006, 5007, 5008, 5009. TRACT 003801 including block(s) 2010, 2011, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2026, 2028, 2029. TRACT 004000 including block(s) 3006. TRACT 004404 including block(s) 1030, 1031, 1032, 1033, 1034, 1035, 1036, 1044, 1045. TRACT 005001 including block(s) 9005, 9007, 9008, 9067. TRACT 005100 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2020, 2021, 2024, 2025. TRACT 005201 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019. TRACT 005202 including block(s) 9000, 9002, 9003, 9029, 9030, 9031, 9032, 9033, 9034, 9035, 9036, 9037. TRACT 005302 including block(s) 2001, 2002, 2003, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030, 2031, 2032, 2033, 2034, 2035, 2036, 2037, 2038, 2039, 2040, 2041, 2042, 2043, 2044, 2045, 2046, 2047, 2048. TRACT 005303 including block(s) 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017, 3018, 3019, 3020, 3021, 3022, 3023, 3024, 3025, 3026, 3027, 3028. TRACT 005304 including block(s) 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012„ 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032, 1036, 1042, 1044, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017. TRACT 005501 including block(s) 9004. TRACT 005600 including block(s) 9038, 9039, 9046. TRACT 006500 including block(s) 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017, 3018, 3019, 3020, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, 4010. Lansing twp Leroy twp Locke twp Meridian twp Onondaga twp Wheatfield twp White Oak twp Williamston city Williamstown twp DISTRICT 24 Allegan County Barry County Eaton County �Z/�Fi ��,�,✓ // C o cr,�lry c.,uk�,���� District 1 Lansing city (46000) PART Tract 001500 Part Block 2997 Tract 001701 part Block 1000-1008 1011-1021 ? 1996-1998 Tract 001702 PART Block 1000-1015 1035-1048 1999 Tract 002400 PART Block 1001-1004 1007 1010-1029 2005-2012 3000-3016 Tract 002500 Tract 003301 Part Block 1017-1018 2002-2026 Tract 003302 Part Block 1006-1013 1019-1020 2000-2022 Lansing charter township (46020) PART Tract 003400 Part Block 1003-1014 2001-2013 3000-3015 Tract 003500 Part Block 1000 1002-1019 2001-2013 2016-2024 3000-3009 4 District 2 Lansing city (46000) PART Tract 000100 Tract 000200 Part Block 1000-1018 2000-2025 Tract 000300 Tract 000400 Part Block 1000-1014 2008-2013 4000-4012 Tract 000500 Part Block 1000-1010,1013 2000-2008 3000-3010 Tract 000700 Part Block 1000-1003 2003-2007,2012 3000-3002,3009-3011 Tract 000800 Part Block 1000-1011 2000-2007 3000-3005 4000-4008 Tract 000900 Part Block 1002-1008 2009-2010 Tract 003102 Part Block 1003 Tract 003200 Part Block 1001-1017 2000-2010 Tract 003301 Part Block 1000-1016 2000-2001 Tract 003302 Part Block 1000-1018 Tract 003400 Part Block 1000-1002 2000 3 District 2 (continued) Tract 005302 Part Block 2039 Tract 005800 Part lV/" Block 3018 District Lansing city (46000) PART Tract 000200 PART Block 2026-2033 Tract 000800 PART Block 2008-2011 3006-3011 Tract 000900 PART Block 2000-2017 Tract 001000 Tract 001200 PART Block 1000 1004-1005 1009-1019 1021 1025-1027 2000-2011 3000-3014 Tract 001300 PART Block 1000-1045 Tract 001400 PART Block 1000-1002 Tract 002100 PART Block 1001 2006-2014 Tract 003101 PART Block 1000 1027-1028 1037-1038 Tract 003102 PART Block 1004-1006 1009-1018 1022-1026 1033-1034 1036-1037 1045-1046 1048-1049 Tract 003801 PART Block 2010-2011 2015-2018 2026 2028-2029 3 5 District 3 (continued) Tract 004000 PART Block 3006 Tract 006500 Lansing charter township (46020) PART Tract 000900 Part Block 1000-1001 Tract 001000 Part Block 2007-2010 2023-2027 2030 Tract 001200 Part Block 1001-1003 1006-1008 1020 1022-1024 1028 Tract 003101 Part Block 1001-1026 1029-1036 1039-1045 Tract 003102 Part Block 1000-1002 1007-1008 1019-1021 1027-1032 1035 1038-1044 1047 1050-1054 Tract 003200 Part Block 1000 Tract 003801 P Block 012-1013 2030-2031 Tract 003802 Part Block 9012-9013 r District 4 Lansing city (46000) PART Tract 000400 PART Block 2000-2007 2014-2018 3000-3013 4013-4035 Tract 000500 PART Block 1011, 1012 Tract 000600 Tract 000700 PART Block 1004-1022 2000-2002 2008-2015 3003-3008 Tract 001300 PART Block 1027-1043 Tract 001400 PART Block 1003-1028 Tract 001500 Tract 001600 Tract 001701 PART Block 1009-1010, 1999 Tract 001900 Tract 002000 Tract 002100 PART Block 1000 1002-1022 2000-2005 2015-2028 Tract 002300 PART Block 3000-3024 Tract 002400 PART Block 1000 1005-1006 1008-1009 1030 1999 2000-2004, 2013-2031 7 District Tract 002600 PART Block 3000-3001 Tract 003500 PART Block 1001 2000 2014-2016 4 (continued) �r_rit e � 30�1y �Z f2 �v-iol�i.s CO7j ! •3�,1 pVs District 5 Lansing city (46000) PART Tract 002200 Tract 002300 PART Block 1000-1015 2000-2019 4000-4016 Tract 002600 PART Block 1000-1012 2000-2008 3002-3013 Tract 002700 Tract 002800 PART Block 1000-1002 1006-1008 3000-3006 Tract 002901 PART Block 1005 1010 1012-1028 2000-2005, 2999 Tract 002902 Tract 003700 PART Block 1000-1001 1003-1011 2000-2006 Tract 004404 PART Block 1030-1036 1044-1045 Lansing charter township (46020) PART Tract 004404 PART Block 1043 0 District 6 Lansing city (46000) PART Tract 001702 PART Block 1016-1034 Tract 003601 Tract 003602 Tract 003700 PART Block 1002 3000-3007 4000-4007 5000-5009 Tract 005100 PART Block 1000-1017 2000-2018 2020-2021 2024-2025 Tract 005201 PART Block 2011 2015-2017 Tract 005202 PART Block 9002-9003 10 District 7 Lansing city (46000) PART Tract 002800 PART Block 1003-1005 1009-1014 2000-2014 3007-3024 Tract 005201 PART Block 1000-1015 2000-2010 2012-2014 2018-2019 Tract 005202 PART Block 9000 9029-9037 Tract 005302 PART Block 2001-2003 2008-2038 2040-2048 Tract 005303 Tract 005304 PART Block 1009-1032 1036 1042 1044 2000-2017 Tract 005501 PART Block 9004 L? -r" -6 a District 8 East Lansing city (24120) PART Tract 003801 PART Block 1000-1012 2000-2009, 2014 2019-2025, 2027 Tract 003802 PART Block 1000-1010 9000-9011 9014-9016 Tract 004000 PART Block 1000-1013 2000-2016 3000-3005 3007-3020 4000-4020 Tract 004100 PART Block 3000-3004 3008-3009 4000-4014 Tract 004200 PART Block 2002 2006-2007 Tract 004500 PART Block 1000 12 District 9 East Lansing city (24120) PART Tract 003901 Tract 003902 PART Block 1000 1002-1021 2000-2024 3000-3014 3016-3017 Tract 004100 PART Block 1000-1003 1009-1010 2000 2015 Tract 004301 PART Block 1000-1006 1011-1013 2001-2002 2012-2013 3000-3016 4000-4023 Tract 004302 PART Block 2002 2004 Tract 004600 PART Block 9028-9033 Meridian charter township (53140) PART Tract 004500 PART Block 1001-1017 9000-9022 Tract 004600 PART Block 9017-9027 13 District 10 East Lansing city (24120) PART Tract 002901 PART Block 1000-1004 1006-1009 1011 Tract 003902 PART Block 3015 Tract 004100 PART Block 1004-1008 2001-2014 3005-3007 3010-3012 Tract 004200 PART Block 1000-1006 2000-2001 2003-2005 2008-2009 Tract 004302 PART Block 2005-2008 Tract 004402 Tract 004403 Tract 004404 PART Block 1000-1024 1027-1029 1037 1046-1047 Tract 004405 14 District 11 Meridian charter township (53140) PART Tract 004301 PART Block 1007-1010 1014-1023 2000 2003-2010 Tract 004302 PART Block 2000-2001,2003 Tract 004600 PART Block 9000-9016 9034-9052 Tract 004700 Tract 004800 Tract 004901 PART Block 1000-1020 1022-1026 1029 4000-4009 Tract 005002 PART Block 9000-9009 9016-9021 15 District 12 Lansing city (46000) PART (425 Agreement) Tract 005001 Part Block 9005 9007-9008 9067 Meridian charter township (53140) PART Tract 004404 Part Block 1025-1026 1038-1042 Tract 004901 Part Block 1021 1027-1028 2000-2021 2999 3000-3019 4010-4018 Tract 004902 Tract 005001 Part Block 9000-9004 9006 9009-9066 IN District 13 Leroy township (47080) Locke township (49040) Stockbridge township (76580) White Oak township (86900) Williamston city (87420) Williamstown township (87440) 17 District 14 Alaiedon township (00800) Bunker Hill township (11640) Delhi charter township (21420) PART Tract 005302 PART Block 1000-1050 2000, 2004-2007 Tract 005304 PART Block 1000-1008 1033-1035 1037-1041,1043 1045-1046 1998-1999 Tract 005400 PART Block 1000-1009 2000-2011 4000-4002 5000-5004 5009-5014 Tract 005502 PART Block 1000-1024 1998-1999 9000-9001 9003-9004 9007 9009-9011 Ingham township (40640) Lansing city (46000) PART (425 Agreement) Tract 005600 PART Block 9038-9039 9046 Wheatfield township (86520) PART 18 District 15 Aurelius township (04240) Delhi charter township (21420) PART Tract 005100 PART Block 2019, 2022-2023 Tract 005202 PART Block 9001, 9004-9028 900.38-9039 Tract 005400 PART Block 3000-3021 4003-4017 5005-5008 Tract 005501 PART Block 9000-9003 9005-9077 9999 Tract 005502 PART Block 9002 9005-9006 9008 9012-9029 19 District 16 Leslie city (47180) Leslie township (47200) Mason city (52180) Onondaga township (60800) Vevay township (82220) FI E` G R A P II 12 C S INGHAM COUNTY APPPORTIONMENT COMMITTEE Plan 11 Commission District Census Tract/Block Descriptions 06/14/01 Database Graphics 210 Abbott Road, Suite 20, East Lansing, MI 48823 517-351-5631 voice 517-336-4504 fax 2000 Census Tracts Tgr26065ccd00.shp Census Divisions -Eaton Tracts 2000 -Ingham 0 Block Groups 2000 -Ingham 0 Block Groups 2000 -Eaton Blocks 2000 -Ingham W 10 9 E 003301 003302 000300 0 000100 1 1 003102 000800_ 000900 00100 1 006500 001400 001900 0 l 001500 D c 002100 n O 001701 / 002 0 002000 001702 00250 005100 a j! 004404 002600 002901 Q O 003700 002700-�— O 002800 - - - UUb303 -_ -- 005201 005304 005302 Current Ward Lines DISTRICT TAPERSONS _�._ Targ _ L3ev TABLACK NHISPAN/C TAAMERIN"TAASIAN ' TAHAWRAC w 1 29525 i 29777 �j 1 % -- 43131 4096 359 768 j 13 -- 2 _-.._..._ 30168 29777 _---- 34 I_1 % - 1 4049 -- 2156 191 677 1 --lo 3 3064- 297771 87�/ 3% 10089; 2583 1871 1125 23 4 .................._..-------'-.._.__--- ............. 28768 29777 / Odt -3% I -- -- - 76411- -- ! _._..._.__ __..__.3051 i �_. 216 797 _ _ 16 Unassigne _ _ _ Oj 119109 9729i —_ �" — _----- -t928i -79 869, 11 J Page 1 L CITY OF LANSING REGISTERED VOTERS PER PRECINCT FOR THE AUGUST 7, 2001 PRIMARY ELECTION WARD ONE PRECINCT TOTAL WARD TWO PRECINCT TOTAL WARD THREE PRECINCT TOTAL WARD FOUR PRECINCT TOTAL 1. 1946 1. 1281 IE. 1209 1. 1141 2. 867 2. 1750 2. 1297 2. 1662 3. 1867 3. 1550 3. 883 3. 1489 4. 774 4. 1329 4. 1724 4. 1603 5. 1174 5. 1565 5. 1728 5. 2207 6. 1814 6. 1349 6E. 2207 6. 740 7. 2010 7. 1089 7. 1586 7. 513 8. 879 8. 1456 8. 1711 8. 968 9. 717 9. 1591 9. 1518 9. 1234 10. 704 10. 1601 10. 1329 10. 1253 11. 1488 11. 1897 11. 826 11. 965 12. 1307 12. 904 12. 1235 12. 1511 13. 1009 13. 1068 13. 1256 13. 966 14. 1025 14. 1978 14. 1215 14. 1474 15. 616 15. 824 15. 1191 15. 1034 16. 1211 16. 977 17. 755 17. 1330 TOTALS 20163-][:: 21232 20915 21067 TOTAL REGISTERED VOTERS = 831377 Plan A Changes - Portion of Ward 4 Precinct 7 to the 1 st Ward Portion of Ward 2 precinct 12 to 1 st ward Ward 3 Precinct 11 to 4th Ward Portion of Ward 2 Precinct 5 to the 3rd Ward DISTRICT TAPERSONS Targ Devw ^ TABLACKnTNHiSPAN1C TAAMERINkTAASlAN fTAHAWPAC 1 29884 29777: 107_, 0%0; 4378: .,_........,.......__.._........._....._.._._.. 4120, 364; .... .. - 768: ...... ....... -- 13 2 -_..__....._._._.-.........._............:..............-......._.._......-.....,..... _..__...... _ 29800:..._....._.29777..........3....._%..__ .......................401.4 ..............................-..........2125 , _............................__�_8.6. ....... -.---..............-677'....._..-_-..._._...._................__�-�.. 3, 29689; 29777!"$_Y 0%0 10028 2527 188 111 .... <.........- - ...__. _.......... 4 . 297361 29777 "Hl 0% 7672: 3114: 2151 803: 16 Unassigne 0 119 109! 9729: 7627; 1028: 8079 112 Plan D Changes - Part of Ward 4 Precinct 1 to Ward the 1 st Ward Part od Ward 4 Precinct 7 to the 1st Ward Ward 3 precinct 11 to the 4th Ward Part of Ward 2 Precinct 5 to the 3rd Ward DISTRICT TAPERSONS Targ. Dev. TABLACK TNHIV,�ANIC TAAMERIN iAASIAN '-- TAHAWPAC 1 29797'; 29777, 0%° 4381: 4138; 364: 768; 13 2 .......__.......-.-_-.........__.._._........._._....._._ 29837; ........................_........_......---o.....,..........._........._...._..._................_..........._........ 297771 0% 4013; — - .._.............,..._.......- 2127; ....._..._.........- , .... 185 _........._..._........... - - --.......- 672? -... 10 3 29848; ...._.._.__..._,..._..._..._......__ 297771 0% ....................... 10042; _....._.__...._...__._..........._._.._....._.._......._.....__s.... 254311 _._...._._.....__1_._....._.. --- 190` 1124; — - 23 4 29627; 29777; -._............_............__ -1% ......................_. 7656; —------., _ 30781 _....—...- ----------._......,--._.._..-- 214; 803' ....._—_ 16 Unassi ne 9 __......._..__.---__..;_...._......_.__.___._.a_._.__.______._.....__._...__.____............ 0 119109; 26092: .......... 11886 953' ..............._...._.__....._. 3367' __-.__.....__._......__ 62 I y o - m o I 3 2 r, L Plan C Changes - Portion of Ward 2 Precinct 4 to the 1 st Ward Portion of Ward 1 Precinct 5 to the 2nd Ward Portion of Ward 4 Precinct 7 to the 1 st Ward Ward 3 Precinct 11 to the 4th Ward DIST De TABLACK T 1 `.AtvIC TAAMERIN�CAS ' � TAHAWPAC 1 29777 1(p$ 1%i 4364; 4091 ; 365. _ 774 .. .... __.—_.__._._...... 13 .._._........_...29945; 2 -'a 29911. _.._.-_._ 29777 ..:. .......... ........ ._.. ...__ .... .. _........... 3 29517. . 29777.7ZGD _..._ ... ....... 10006; --...... 2514; .. _. . 184 1119 23 ... 4 _.----_.___._._ 29736. .. . .7._°/a: ....... .,._ .. _ . ..._.... .... _....- -- ....-... - --.....__.... _ --.... __...__.._.._._ ._ ......... ......_..� ...__..._.._` ...__.._....._.._.. __ _......... Unassigne 19 ,... 919109; i 9729:: ... 7627; _ - 1028: .. ----.._.. _ ..... 8079: 112 In N i A Current Ward Lines DISTRICT TAPERSONS Tare Dev TABLACK .TNHISPAN,A Q,,, TAAMERIN�TAASI : TAHAWPAC 129525 29777 ;1,52__.1 %- 4313 I j j 768 i..._....__._ 13 2 30168; _ 29777] 3Q 1°7oi _ 4049; _. _4096 _-.-...____359 21561 191: ............._..._ 677Y 10 3 0648 30648; 29777j���/ 3°lof - 10089:..................__.._2583._....___._..._..._187;____.-_......._1125<........._........_.._..____23 4 28768 29777 /041 3%1 7641 3051': 216' 797 16 Unassigne 0i 119109 i 97 9: Ifs2T _+m1 897`9 1a -----._._. .__ _._..-.._,..... _-- - - ....._ .... - ._ ......... .. r CITY OF LANSING REGISTERED VOTERS PER PRECINCT FOR THE AUGUST 7, 2001 PRIMARY ELECTION WARD ONE PRECINCT TOTAL WARD TWO PRECINCT TOTAL WARD THREE PRECINCT TOTAL WARD FOUR PRECINCT TOTAL 1. 1946 1. 1281 IE. 1209 1. 1141 2. 867 2. 1750 2. 1297 2. 1662 3. 1867 3. 1550 3. 883 3. 1489 4. 774 4. 1329 4. 1724 4. 1603 5. 1174 5. 1565 5. 1728 5. 2207 6. 1814 6. 1349 6E. 2207 6. 740 7. 2010 7. 1089 7. 1586 7. 513 S. 879 8. 1456 S. 1711 8. 968 9. 717 9. 1591 9. 1518 9. 1234 10. 704 10. 1601 10. 1329 10. 1253 11. 1488 11. 1897 11. 826 11. 965 12. 1307 12. 904 12. 1235 12. 1511 13. 1009 13. 1068 13. 1256 13. 966 14. 1025 14. 1978 14. 1215 14. 1474 15. 616 15. 824 15. 1191 15. 1034 16. 1211 16. 977 17. 755IF i 17. 1330 TOTALS 20163 -][_21232JE:= 20915 21067 TOTAL REGISTERED VOTERS = 83,377 Plan A Changes - Portion of Ward 4 Precinct 7 to the 1 st Ward Portion of Ward 2 precinct 12 to 1 st ward Ward 3 Precinct 11 to 4th Ward Portion of Ward 2 Precinct 5 to the 3rd Ward DISTRICT 'TAPERSONS Targ. Dey. TABLACK ,- PAM TAAMER/N,,!*A, A TAHAWPAC 1 29884: 29777 07. 0%, 4378. 4120:_..__._._.364 .............. --.. .. _. 2 29800; ......_............_. _.... .. ....................... 29777; 2.3....0%..i..........._.. .. 4014 _..........................:......----.__............._....._.....................:_...._...._._....__............ 2125. 186: 677. ___....—._..........._..................._-- 10 ._......................... 3 29689: 29777: -If .......................... . .._._.__—_...._..............,._........ ---- ............._...... 4 29736. 29777;" Hl 0% 7672: 3114: 215: 803; 16 Unassigne _._. .............. 0 1191091 9729 7627 1028; 8079 i 112 Brooki and- -- --. Plan B Changes - Portion of Ward 4 Precinct 7 to the 1 st Ward Portion of Ward 2 Precinct 4 to the 1 st Ward Portion of Ward 1 Precinct 5 to the 2nd Ward Portion of Ward 3 Precinct 11 to the 4th Ward DISTRICT TAPERSONS K, Targ. „Dey s, ;TABLACK TNI�/S,PAIV/C TAAMER/N IMHAWPAC 1 29945 29777; ib 1%i 4364 4091 j ____.._.._._ 365' 774 ...._. ._..._..----..._ 13 2 - - ..... ._.. _.._�..... ._... --- , 3 . ................,........................................,....... 29777..;.`_31....__0%° _---........_........................_.._�_._...._._.._...............:...._.__.._._......_............................__...._..._.............._................. 10022; 2525; . 184 - _............_............. 4 _........._........29738..:........__... 29515. ..............__.._.........._.........................................._...._..............._.._._................_..........:._.... 29777 `z X -1% ..._.... 7656! 3103: ---.._-._.............._...............................---....._..............,-----....-...._._._._...._.....................__._.-.....---...__...._ ..:...............__._1120;. 215. 802. _ _._.........._23.. 16 'Unassigne ..._..._......._........_...._.....__.._ 19 119106: ... ....._.... 9729 7627 __... -- ..._.._... _ ... -- -_ i 1028: .. _-. ....... 8079' -... 112 _. _...-----.._....._. _... _ I id mftk - �VVLI i im LEI .:-s-,- --�� Plan C Changes - Portion of Ward 2 Precinct 4 to the 1 st Ward Portion of Ward 1 Precinct 5 to the 2nd Ward Portion of Ward 4 Precinct 7 to the 1 st Ward Ward 3 Precinct 11 to the 4th Ward DISTRICT TAPERSONS Targ. Oev. I TLCBLACK TNHISPANIC < TAAMERIN T ,.. SIAN TAHAINPAC 1 29945 297771(p$ 1%i_ 4364. 4091. 774 13 .. 29911 ....... 29777;13{ ......... _ 0%� ......... 4050. _._.. .. 2167; _365 ......... 1891 -- --....._, ._ 671; .. 10 - .... ------_.._.................. ....._......_..................._............................._.....................__............-___...._................_.......;..........-----................... 29517: 29777i6D -1% 10006' _...._.......:.._.._-__...._.---..............., 2514: .... _.._.................._......_....__..__...----..._........_...... 184; 1119 23 .......... ___..............:. 29736 29777�y/ ° 0% 7672; 3114; 215 803. 16 _._....................._......_,........_........_....._......_.......,....._.............__........._..,.-_._._....._............._..._............._----._........................... _ ..._.._._.__..._.__ . 19 119109; ; .---- ! 9729; _ i ...........- 7627 _... _- -- i ._..... _...........4_....---................................_._..._..._.._.__._._.......... _-1028 _ i 8079 _...... _._._._112 A Plan D Changes - Part of Ward 4 Precinct 1 to Ward the 1 st Ward Part od Ward 4 Precinct 7 to the 1 st Ward Ward 3 precinct 11 to the 4th Ward Part of Ward 2 Precinct 5 to the 3rd Ward DISTRICT TAPERSONS Targ. D@V. I TABLACK TNHISPANIC TAAMERIN TAASIAN TAHAWPAC 1 29797: 29777 20 0% 4381 768; 13.. 2 29837; _ ..... 29777 (va 0% _ ......__._ 4013; __4138:_......_....._.__364: 2127; 185 — - -- 672; 10 329848; _._..._... — 29777% 0%;10042; _..._.._.._......._...............---.._.__..-_..._...__._._.._......_,_...___.__.._._.-...__.__..__._._....._...._...._.---._ 2543' 190; ..--_--__.._._.. _ 1124; ..._...._ 23 4 .... .... ----...................................... 29627: ----.....__.._-............_—._ r _ 297771.. - -- . -1%j _— — 7656; _....—_...__ 3078; ..._..... --_ .._...--......................_....__ 2141 ._,._._........_...__._..__... 803 _ 16 Unassigne ..._..._.._._....__-__........_0_........._1191091 ._.......- ._....._..._!_.._._._..__.._26092!......__.........._...._..._11886:..._._ .._.._.953:._....__ 3367_...._.. __ ......__...._62 � r1 L� W a DIGITAL CNt:INCC(iINC fl Ufif•UflAT1UN Redistrittinq 5.1.ti- autoBound 4 Sample Population Summary Report You can customize the graphics and fields used in this report using Crystal 32K — 28K �- 24K 20K 16K 12K 8K _ 4K J OK � lilevel_summary.PRIMARYPOP um of $mulilevel summary.TAWHITE Sum of $mulilevel_summary.TABLACK Sum of $mulilevel_summary.TAAMERIND = " Sum of $mulilevel_summary.TAAMERIND Sum of $mulilevel_summary.TAASIAN Sum of $mulilevel_summary.TA10THER Sum of $mulilevel_summary.TNHISPANIC September 5,2001 32K Plan Name: d:\Census2000\Plans\TemplatReport Created b balimyou 1 28K 1 24K Na tiv e 20K 16K 12K -�� 8K SIAN OTHERHISPANIC 4K OK 29,525 20,508 4,313 359 768 1931 4,096 Total for District: 2 Plan Name: d:\Census2000\Plans\TemplatReport Created b balimyou 1 Na tiv e PERSONS WHITEBLACK American SIAN OTHERHISPANIC Total for District: 1 29,525 20,508 4,313 359 768 1931 4,096 Total for District: 2 30,168 23,239 4,049 191 677 886 2,156 Total for District: 3 30,648 16,619 10,089 187 1,125 1255 2,583 Total for District: 4 28,768 17,384 7,641 216 797 338 3,051 Grand Total: 119,109 77,750 26,092 953 3,367 5,410 11,886 Plan Name: d:\Census2000\Plans\TemplatReport Created b balimyou 1 4 E>IGIT"AI_ c Nr—ccni Nc conI`[1Nn11CIN R edi a L,i. ti ng Solution autoBound 4 Sample Population Summary Report You can customize the graphics and fields used in this report using Crystal September 5,2001 32K 32K 28K 28K 24K = 24K 20K 16K 20K 12K 16K 8K - 12K 4 K �. ���` = ' 8K OK 4K lilevel_summary.PRIMARYPOP um of $mulilevel summary.TAWHITE ` Sum of $mulilevel_summary.TABLACK Sum of $mulilevel_summary.TAAMERIND 4 Sum of $mulilevel_summary.TAAMERIND Sum of $mulilevel summary.TAASIAN / 2 Sum of $mulilevel_summary.TAIOTHER Sum of $mulilevel_summary.TNHISPANIC Native PERSONS WHITEBLACK American SIAN OTHERHISPANIC Total for District: 1 29,884 20,767 4,378 364 768 1950 4,120 Total for District: 2 29,800 22,938 4,014 186 677 860 2,125 Total for District: 3 29,689 15,783 10,028 188 1,119 1241 2,527 Total for District: 4 29,736 18,262 7,672 215 803 1359 3,114 Grand Total: 119,109 77,750 26,092 953 3,367 5,410 11,886 Plan Name: d:\census2000\plans\plan a Report Created b balimyou 1 September 5,2001 autoBound 4 Sample Population Summary Report DIGITAL You can customize the graphics and fields used in this report using Crystal Red- ,ting S,Iuti... 32K 28K 24K 20K 16K 12K 8K 4K OK , — lilevel_summary.PRIMARYPOP - um of $mulilevel_summary.TAWHI I E Sum of $mulilevel_summary.TABLACK Sum of $mulilevel_summary.TAAMER11 \ Sum of $mulilevel_summary.TAAMERIND Sum of $mulilevel_summary.TAASIAN Sum of $mulilevel_summary.TAlOTHER Sum of $mulilevel_summary.TNHISPANIC Total for District: 1 Total for District: 2 Total for District: 3 Total for District: 4 Grand Total: 32K 28K 24K 20K 16K 12K 8K 4K OK Plan Name: d:\census2000\plans\plan b Report Created b balimyou 1 Native PERSONS WHITEBLACK American SIAN OTHERHISPANIC 29,945 20,850 4,364 365 774 1921 4,091 29,911 22,990 4,050 189 671 899 2,167 29,738 15,844 10,022 184 1,120 1232 2,525 29,515 18,066 7,656 215 802 1358 3,103 119,109 77,750 26,092 953 3,367 5,410 11,886 Plan Name: d:\census2000\plans\plan b Report Created b balimyou 1 Plan E Part of Ward 1 Precinct 2 to Ward 4 Part of Ward 4 Precinct 7 to Ward 1 Part of Ward 1 Precinct 5 to Ward 2 DISTRICT TAPERSONS Tq% Dev."TABLACK -A TNHISPAN/C '' TAAMERIN''TAASIAN' `TAHAWPAC 1 29518. 29777 -1%; 2 ,y ,, 297771 2 /o ...... 4057 -- - _ .... 21701— ---- ..__ ._f ._... 1911 _ ... 678 ......_..._. . . 11 3 .. ___30376 3 . _ .. _.. _ ...... - ... - -- - —.__ 4 28567: 29777: -4%i 758311_ 303711 21111 797: 16 Unassigne 0; 1191091 26092. _ 11886 953' 3367_ 62 autoBound 4 Sample Population Summary Report September 14,2001 E:101 G ITAL �rvr_.mcrnma conronnnory You can customize the graphics and fields used in this report using Crystal H cd;atrlc ti^g Solutione 32K 28K 32K 24K 28K 2 24K 0K 16K 20K 12K 16K 8K 12K 4K _.' 8K OK -� 4K lilevel_summary.PRIMARYPOP/� _ �/ OK �', um of $mulilevel summary.TAWHITE � -- Sum of $mulilevel_summary.TABLACK Sum of $mulilevel_summary.TAAMERIND Sum of $mulilevel_summary.TAAMERIND Sum of $mulilevel_summary.TAASIAN Sum of $mulilevel_summary.TAIOTHE\ R \ Sum of $mulilevel_summary.TNHISPANIC 1 Native PERSONS WHITEBLACK American SIAN OTHERHISPANIC Total for District: 1 29,525 20,440 4,366 364 767 937 4,096 Total for District: 2 30,376 23,431 4,057 191 678 887 2,170 Total for District: 3 30,648 16,619 10,089 187 1,125 255 2,583 Total for District: 4 28,560 17,260 7,580 211 797 331 3,037 Grand Total: 119,109 77,750 26,092 953 3,367 5,410 11,886 Plan Name: d:\census2000\plans\plan e Report Created b balimyou and 55 1 65 102 52 1 78 1 49 41 , 44 55 r 39 ;'a 31 60 60 —___-- 45 75 -- 41 39 43 59 74 56 56 60 61 37 0 57 68 43 44 54 46 47 7/ 35 76 54 50 71 60 55 0 68 49 20 323 41 , 0 36 w 196 74 48 71 113FLI 2567 19 61 201 7 87 57 IC 24 21 41 39 56 38 33 49 36 38 17 47 14 53 63 60 26 44 28 16 33 38 14 16 39 34 45 66 2 60 45 23 48 35 12 34 33 46 201 7 87 57 IC M.- 70 MO 75 79 58 93 63 59 48 52 38 42 71 47 2 70 0 W 30 65 38 6 58 42 9 37 \ 2 70 0 36 38 41 6 78 24 33 38 3 25 31 35 9 1 40 30 31 28 73 8 3 68 27 42 28 2 42 14 19 23 14 5 40 14 J t u 62 44 55 62 t42 31 7 U 157 41 43 44 48 25 61 196 50 49 57 57 N 37 0 97 4 0 2 102 80 111 30 65 22 130 75 77 - 38 118 0 50 118 40 56 58 42 9 37 2 12 82 19 52 87 58 116 127 42 70 0 36 38 41 21 53 75 2 25 26 16 24 33 38 35 36 131 123 32 13 78 36 25 31 35 46 18 37 29 33 41 0 32 31 40 30 31 28 37 33 27 73 0 51 24 43 39 18 138 53 30 23 68 27 42 28 65 22 42 14 19 14 19 40 15 40 14 23 8 32 39 44 48 25 61 196 50 49 57 57 N FROM,: DIGITAL ENGINEERING CORPOPATIO PHONE NO. : 14107155507 5525 Twin Knolls Rd.. Suite 321 Columbia, MD 21045 (Tel) d10-715-2300 (Fax) 410-715 5507 To: Bob Alim-Young From: Kate Guenther Fax: 517-377-0068 Pages: 6 Phoaee Date: 3/21/01 Re: autoBound Information CC: Mar. 21 2001 08:52AM P1 ❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle • Comments: MAR-71—PnI711 17: PF, 14107155507 98i P. 01 FROM.: DIGITAL ENGINEERING CORPOPATIO PHONE NO. : 14107155507 Mar. 21 2001 Oe:53AM P2 autoBound 4 Q Q Q 4� auto ou n 4 Redistricting and ReapportionTe system the leading redistricting technology used throughout the United States A SOLID PLATFORM autoBound is built on the ArcView Desktop GIS. With over 500,000 users world wide, ArcView is the undisputed leader in mapping technology. It is important. to note that in every statn in the US, the largrst users of GTS and mapping tt-chnology, use ArcView and other ES RI based software. COMPLETE SOLUTION autoBound provides a complete solution covering every aspecLofeedistricting from Census data import to disaggregation and import of political data to multiple redistricting tools to reporting, mapping and final compactness analysis. With autoBound you are not dependent on the data delivery schedule of your vendor. You have all the tools needed to complete the process in house. OPEN SYSTEM UNike other commerc tai redistricting software packages, autoBound is based on Ooen Database standards, autoBound databases can be directly opened by other desktop applications such as MS Excel, Word and Access enabling unparalleled analytical capability. The open environment also extends to providing user access to source code for both the ArcView interfar:H and the autoBound software. BROAD BASE OF There are over 550 authorized ES R1 partners nationwide. Tnis rnedns in every SUPPORT state in the US, autoBound users have access to immediate local support. No other redistricting software vendor comas close to such broad base of support.. HIGHLY EXTENSIBLE .LveryaspectofautoBbund Can becustom ized tothe user'srequiremerits. From AND CUSTOMIZABLE icons to menu items, users can add, remove and rename tools as necessary. Additionally, Users can take advantage of hundreds of existing commercial and freeware tools available for use with ArcView and autoBound. COPYRiGH 12000.DIGITALENGIN EERING GORPORATION-WWW.DIGITALGORP-COM ,n1ar7Ic�,CZrnr? qAi P.02 FROM.: DIGITAL ENGINEERING CORPOPATIO PHONE NO. : 14107155507 Mar. 21 2001 09:54AM P3 a 91 A toBound 4 Fpr nvor six years, Digital Engln_ering Corporation, (I)FC) ha; been providing software tools which set the standards in redistricting software. AutoSound 4 is DEC's latest release of its con'tprehensive redistricting solution and is simply the easiest and most efficient tool for creating legislative and political boundaries. AutoRound is based on the ArcView desktop GIS, the most. popular GIS product world-wide from SSRI, the !catling provider of GIS technology. Autofiound is a complete network ready redistricting solution covering every aspect of redistricting from the initial data import. to final pian analysis using one of 12 Conip,12CMess and Complexity AflAly.cis taxis. Features and Specification: REDISTRICTING FEATURES > Multiple District Editing Tools. There are several tools including select by pointing, drawing a box or lassoing an area s Smart Select. Automatically identifies features for adding to district I. Built. in Excel compatible spread sheet allows dynamic analysis of data r Unlimited undos allows you to go back to any point in the Plan's history > Multiple Pian views provides thematic displays of demographic data X1. fndex map allows quick room to different parts of the state or count,,/ r Locking tool enable the locking o f a district once it has been balanced > Grouping tool allows the protection of communities of int'erest. > 6WIt in report creates professional output for printing or exporciny . Error finder locates and suggest corrections for unassigned and discontiguous features > Metes and bounds tool provide a report of the district outline segments s Compactness and Complexity tool provide 12 measurements and the base geometry for Convex Hull, Inscribe Circle and Circumscribe circle REDISTRICTING ADMINISTRATION AND DATA DEVELOPMENT s Control which Tiger layers will be used during the redistricting process > Setup central locations where common files such as legends are stored I. Customize and import Tiger data for 97, 98, 99 and 2000 formats . Customize and import PL94-171 data for 90 and 2000 formats > Merge the P L and Tiger dat.i and report match rates > Create statewide and county level files > Project the database to any of over 100 geographic projections > On a networked environment., control who can have access to the system s import Political date for any Tiger data level It. Disaggregate and aggregate political data to all levels of geography P. Create and manipulate data fields for the entire database > Perform Quality Control on the redistricting databases . Manage a backup system for the entire system i Create and manage incumbent location files > Create and manage plan templates GEOTRACK- REDISTRICTING FREEWARE FOR AUTOSOUND P. Fraeiy distributable viewing and editing tool for use with auto6ound > Enables management and public participation without additional costs > Very easy to use with a quick learning curve > Provides basic mappiny and reporting capabilities > Directly reads and writes to autoBoi.md workspaces without the need for translation of plans P. Includes an Excel compatible built in spreadsheet for performing dynamic statistical analysis s Provides basic labeling and thematic display options > Unlimited undos allows rollback of plan back to any point FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT: Digital Engineering Corporation 0 5525 Twin Knolls Road, Suite 321 Columbia, Maryland 21045�x (410) 715-7.300 FAX: (410) 715-5507 '^: •,.:L'L'5.:: "::_-' Ism Web! www.digitalcorp.com email : info@digitalcorp.com %X= -- Map -0 1 X= MOQ-71 —Ons1 1 -�: ::)q 141 P171555G17 P. 03 FROM : DIGITAL ENGINEERING CORPOPATIO PHONE NO. : 14107155507 Mar. 21 2001 oe:56AM P5 Training, Installation, and Suppor �_,f_ 4 2, 9.s'7 One day of on-site installation and training. • Digital will provide training for autoBound, and A/VR( attendees. • $1400.00/day x 1 day = $1400.00 (plus travel) Two days of on-site installation and training. • Digital will provide training for ArcView, autoBound, and A/VReports. Unlimited attendees. • $1400.00/day x 2 days =$2800.00 (plus travel) One year of standard technical phone support. • Includes upgrades for four licenses of autoBound and A/VReports • Phone support 9ain — 6pm EST Monday — Friday • $2000.00 One year of premium technical phone support. • Includes upgrades for four licenses of autoBound and A/VReports • Phone support 24 hours/day, 7 days/week • $10,000.00 One month of premium technical phone support. • Requires purchase of one year of standard technical support • Phonc support 24 hours/day, 7 days/week • $1500.00/month 450 MHz Pentium Windows 00/NT 96 MB RAM Color graphics 4 MB SVGA Suggested System Digital Engineering Corporation 5525 Twin Knolls Rd., Suite 321 Columbia, MD 21045 (tel) 410-715-2300 (fax) 410-715-5507 Please fax Purchase Orders -- ----------- 0 ncz ,FROM : DIGITAL ENGINEERING CORPOPATIO PHONE NO. : 14107155507 Mar. 21 2001 08:57AM PS a 1 E-3 1 TA 1_ tNGINEEMNG CORPORATION Registration Form autoRound User Training When: March 28 -March 30, 2001 Where: Center for Applied Information Technology Towson University 8000 York Rd. Towson, MD 21252-0001 410-704-4909 Time: 9:00am-5:00pm Cost: $400/day per person Training Schedule: Day 1 (3/28): ArcView Day 2 (3/29): autoBound's Desktop Administrator Day 3 (3/30): autoBound's Redistricting Tools Registration for all three days is not required. You may register for the days which suit your needs. In other words, if you are already proficient in ArcView, you may only want to attend Day 2 and 3 of training. Please fill out the information below and fax it to 410-715-5507. Name: Agency: Address: E-mail: Phone #: Please Circle: • I will be attending <Day 1 Day 2 Day 3> of the training. • I prefer to <fax a purchase order for training Abe invoiced after training. *Please indicate if you wish the invoice to be sent to a different person/address from the person who is registering for the training. Id. ........ . r,. 45 ... ,ln)a77.`S ..: -:',,; . :;' 4'1.0}' 'I S.tiiSD7,.:: ...::,- ..,� .:.::............. . sy.s. 5329 ;F !IN'KI�1(]LLSROAD. .SLUITE32'I.. COL•Uf�161A, Mlr1ElYL NiDit�2. 0:. C4. .230.0lL.,;.FA2C.,f. .__..�! ...� .. _r ..0 Glc aut Redistricting and Reapportionment system rhe lear_ling istricting technology used throughout the United States A SOLID PLATFORM autoBound is built on the ArcView .Desktop GIS. With over 500,000 users world wide, ArcView is the undisputed leader in mapping technology. It is important to note that in every state in the US, the largest users of GIS and mapping technology, use ArcView and other ESR 1 based software. ----------------------------------- . - - -- - - - ----------------------------------------------- ---- -- - ------- COMPLETE ----COMPLETE SOLUTION autoBound provides a complete solution covering every aspect of redistricting from Census data import to disaggregation and import of political data to multiple redistricting tools to reporting, mapping and final compactness analysis. With autoBound you are not dependent on the data delivery schedule of your vendor. You have all the tools needed to complete the process in house. OPEN SYSTEM Unlike other commercial redistricting software packages, autoBound is based on Open Database standards. autoBound databases can be directly opened by other desktop applications such as MS Excel, Word and Access enabling unparalleled analytical capability. The open environment also extends to providing user access to source code for both the ArcView interface and the autoBound software. BROAD BASE OF There are over 850 authorized ESRI partners nationwide. This means in every SUPPORT state in the US, autoBound users have access to immediate local support. No other redistricting software vendor comes close to such broad base of support. HIGHLY EXTENSIBLE Every aspect of autoBound can be customized to the user's requirements. AND CUSTOMIZABLE From icons to menu items, users can add, remove and rename tools as necessary. Additionally, Users can take advantage of hundreds of existing commercial and freeware tools available for use with ArcView and autoBound. C00Y- GHT2000-DIG ITALENGINEER INGCORP0RATI'd N-WWW.DIGITALCORP.COM autoBound 4 For over six years, Digital Engineering Corporation, (DEC) has been providing software tools which set the standards in redistricting software. AutoBound 4 is DEC's latest release of its comprehensive redistricting solution and is simply the easiest and most efficient tool for creating legislative and political boundaries. AutoBound is based on the ArcView desktop GIS, the most popular GIS product world-wide from ESR I, the leading provider of GIS technology. AutoBound is a complete network ready redistricting solution covering every aspect of redistricting from the initial data import to final plan analysis using one of 12 Compactness and Complexity Analysis tools. Features and Specification: _ REDISTRICTING FEATURES Multiple District Editing Tools. There are several tools including select by `'g. f FROM : DIGITAL ENGINEERING CORPOPATIO PHONE NO. : 14107155507 E:� 1 G I T.41L P.NGINPFRING CORPORATION autoBound Redistricting Solution Includes: Mar. 21 2001 oe:56AM P4 0 One license of autoBound 4.0* Intelligent Redistricting Software Full Version (Automated Redistricting Process and Manual Redistricting Tools) • One license of ArcView GIS 3.2 for Windows, Single License (prints maps, analyzes data, queries, generates reports). • Unlimited licenses of Geo Track* Viewing Software for autoBound Freeware included with each purchase of autoBound • One license of ANReports Pro 2.5* with unlimited run-time licenses. Creates reports within ArcView Allows creation of report templates Allows distribution of reports *90 days of technical phone support and one year free upgrades. Pricing Structure uanti Unit Price Less than 3 ..............$3,500 �-: 3-7 .....................$3,0001 8 and up..................$2,7W _ Site license..............$40,000' Shipping & Handling: $30/autoBound license, $15/ArcView license Note: Shipping & Handling is not applicable if DEC will be installing the software. 'Subtract $500 for each license which does not include ArcView. ZSubtract $400 for each license which does not include ArcView. 3Site licenses do not include ArcView. Y FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION CITY OF LANSING LANSING, MICHIGAN TO: JGxil w DATE: c OUTGOING FAX NUMBER: W U -715 . — S S 67 FROM: Bob Alim-Young CITY OF LANSING FAX NUMBER IS DEPT: CITY CLERK (517) 483-7630 MESSAGE: U A Ad b6,,J Z 4ff A—,y(c w 3 1 S e14 j +d t , q.a4 — W'4 / �)� P, VA(cl4<G,91(. �E PAGE 1 OF 2— PAGES [O/HREQ ] FCN [CN] REQ [11510986] PRINTER [ ] DIST/OVR [ ] [ ] **** REQUISITION HEADER **** EMPL ID: DKM ESTIMATE AMT [ 3545.001 DEPT/ORG [172400 ] BUYER [SLB ] REQ DATE [ 61 [26] [ 11 PROJECT [ ] C/B [ ] [ ] TRAN DATE [ ] [ ] [ ] CATEGORY [SSOURC] REQ TYPE [G] - GOODS DATE NEEDED [ 61 [29] [ 11 HOLD (Y/N) [N] REQ STATUS: 1 - OPEN NEXT APPROVAL [AM ] MEMO.... BUSINESS REPORT CODE [ ] PRIMARY VENDOR [ ] - NO ITEMS: 2 ALT ADDRESS [ ] SHIP TO [ 911001 AMOUNT SUGGESTED VENDORS LANSING CITY CLERK [ 3545.001 [DIGITAL ENG. CORP ] 9TH FLOOR CITY HALL [ ] [ ] 124 WEST MICHIGAN AVENUE [ ] [ ] LANSING, MI 48933 SOURCE OF QUOTE [FAX ] SHIP VIA [BEST ] SHIP INS [ ] TERMS [NET 301 - NET 30 DAYS FOB [DESTINATION ] ATTENTION [ ] SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS [ ] (PURCHASING USE ONLY) [NEW VENDOR ] [@] R e d i s t r i c t i n g— w h e t h e r s c h o o l d i s t r i c t s, v o t i n g p r e c i n c t s, or city council districts—is a balancing act. Every change made to one district affects at least one other district. The City of Long Beach has developed an award-winning redistricting appli- cation usingArcView GIS that not only has made the redistricting process more rapid but allows officials to consider new factors and to easily create maps for consensus building and publi- cation notification. The Long Beach City Charter requires the City to evaluate City Council district composition every five years and adjust district boundaries to reflect changes in population. The goal is to create districts that do not deviate more than 5 percent from a predetermined ideal popula- tion mix. Prior to the use of GIS, the redistrict- ing process was a tedious one requiring two to five months. Census block data was kept in an Excel spreadsheet. Blocks affected by bound- ary changes had to be identified, and the new areas were mapped and color coded by hand. Processing a simple boundary change could require a week. The time and effort involved in creating just one scenario severely limited the number of possible what -if situations that could be explored. In 1995, the City decided to find a better way to perform redistricting. "This time around we knew GIS could do it," says Tina Dickinson, GIS managerfor the City of Long Beach. The City started using GIS in 1981. Currently 10 major departments and many subdepartments use GIS. Each department is responsible for main- taining its own data and has one to three staff members with GIS training. The Central Man- agement Department supports all GIS efforts in the City. This Department provides program- ming support for MapObjects and Arc View GIS applications and ensures that data stan- dards are maintained. Dickinson wrote the redistricting application, which displays linked bar and pie charts and a table as well as a map, entirely in ArcView GIS. The application consists of scripts and buttons that are added to the interface. The actual cod- ing and testing took approximately 40 hours in- cluding revisions to accommodate additional functionality requested by users. Not only does the application vividly and instantly illustrate the effects of boundary changes on the popula- tion in terms of deviation from the ideal popu- lation for the subject district, but it also shows the effects on all other districts in the City. For the first time, the effect of boundary changes on the ethnic composition of districts can be determined. This aspect of redistricting could not be done using manual methods. This func- tionality is important because the City may not make or destroy a district with a majority of mi- nority residents. "We had never been able to do many what ifs. It took too much time to do one scenario. At most we produced four. Now each of the nine council members can do five plans and modify them as many times as they want." The GIS staff set up training sessions for coun- cil members and their aides. Within a half hour, council members and their staffs were able to be productive with the application. Previously aides had done most of the work required for developing scenarios using manual methods. The redistricting application is so easy to use that each of the nine council members sat down in front of the screen and devised and modified redistricting scenarios. In addition to integrat- ing guidelines for the ideal district population distribution, the application applies certain con- straints. No council members can change dis- trict boundaries so that another council member's residence is removed from his or her district. Dickinson describes the real value in using the redistricting application in terms of flexibility and the ability to explore many more options. "We had never been able to do many what ifs. It took too much time to do one scenario. At most we produced four. Now each of the nine council members can do five plans and modify them as many times as they want." The real-time visual feedback council members received from the application allowed them to explore options rapidly and to generate maps so that consensus with other council members could be arrived at quickly. Instead of taking up to five months to hash out new district bound- aries, a workable redistricting plan was created and adopted within two weeks. The maps needed for public notification of the redistricting were also easy to generate. Dickinson sees the potential for using the redistricting application to solve other popula- tion -related problems. She has used it to help the Police Department determine the reporting district boundaries for call -for -service requests. The benefits of this application have been rec- ognized outside the City of Long Beach. In 1997, the redistricting application won an achievement award in the public works, general services, parks and recreation category from Public Technology, Inc. (PTI), a nonprofit technology research, development, and com- mercialization organization for cities and counties in the United States. Charts and graphs show the effects of boundary changes on racial composition and deviation from ideal population distributions. Just a Thought... on the 2000 Census By Christopher Thomas, State and Local Government Solutions Manager Flashback to the 1990 Census t seems like it was only yesterday. I was sit- ting at my computer terminal trying to cor- relate precensus population figures with the cryptic land use database for the City of Ontario. What had I gotten myself into? My new job as the demographic planner for Ontario made me responsible for all the tasks relating to the 1990 census. Though I was uncertain about what I had gotten myself into, I was confident that I could per- form anything related to demographic analysis. I had just left a position performing growth stud- ies for the Administrative Services Branch of the County of Riverside's Planning Department. I was used to tracking and maintaining housing developments by geographic components. At the time, Riverside was the fastest growing county in the United States. However, I had raised the stakes by telling my new employer that I could identify deficiencies in the census numbers by using my advanced computer skills. Advanced is a relative term. In reality, I was scared to death but I needed to prove myself worthy of a career in urban plan- ning. I was going to have to quickly develop a comprehensive land use database, analyze the data, and identify and report problem areas. The now -defunct precensus local review process al- lowed only 15 calendar days to report any dis- crepancies. Feeling frustrated and beaten down, I kept thinking there must be an easier way to accomplish this task. Part of my job description included helping to integrate the computer mapping software that was located in the Engineering Department with the operations of the Planning Department. A pilot GIS project at the County of Riverside had used this technology. Computer mapping prom- ised to make govemmentprocesses more efficient. With this in mind, I introduced myself to Robert Flores of the Engineering Department. He had re- cently received the dubious title of computermap- ping technician. Continued on page 7 Counting on ESRI 2000 r From partnering with the U.S. Census Bureau in developing tools and programs that help make census data more accessible to assistingstate and local governments in verifying addresses, ESRI supports many aspects of Census 2000. GIS tools from SSRI help end users, whether in govern- ment or business, more effectively analyze data and quickly disseminate information. Since 1790, the decennial census has provided the baseline demographic profile for the United States. It supplies the data not only for the sta- tistics and projections used by government but is also the basis for commercial demographic data. Government funding on all levels is tied to census data. Representation in government on all levels–federal, state, and local—is deter- mined by census data. Long-range planning, whether by a county deciding where to build a road or a company determining the best loca- tion for a new store, depends on census data. It is the gauge used to measure change in population. ESRI's Support of Census 2000 with the hest in GIS technology will help improve the accuracy of the count... Basis for Funding Following the 1990 census, many governments, particularly those with large numbers of immi- grant or homeless residents, believed theirpopu- lations were undercounted. Governments that disputed census figures were often unsuccessful because they were unable to show specifically where errors were made. The City of Ontario, California, was successful in its appeal thanks to GIS. The City disputed census numbers be- cause illegal or modified units were not included in the count. Maps created using the City's GIS demonstrated where undercounts had occurred. The resulting revised census numbers increased funding for the City. In order to save both time and money and im- prove the accuracy of the upcoming census, a new program provides a mechanism for updat- ing the Census Bureau's Master Address File (MAF). The Local Update of Census Addresses (LUCA) project allows local and tribal govern- ments to update the MAF list before the census by reviewing the address data contained in the Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (TIGER) database. coIt n"M now 1996 Do" iSw i.�..r.71tY�k td Ask xb. bilrrFrnisw.Kwl+b.. w. Yoe TIGER/Line 1995 files available free of charge at the ESRI Web site. The TIGER database, developed to assist cen- sus takers in 1990, covers the entire United States. In order to use the TIGER database with GIS software, the Census Bureau releases peri- odic extracts of the database, including the TIGER/Line files, to the public. ESRI has made TIGER/Line 1995 files avail- able in shapefile format free of charge from ArcData Online located on the ESRI Web site. With this data, governments can immediately perform analysis for LUCA using ArcView GIS or ARC/INFO. Other GIS companies sell the same information for up to $4,000. Providing TIGER/Line 1995 files is just one part of ESRI's commitment to supporting Census 2000. Geocoding addresses verifies both the aggregate number and the actual location of residents. This means needy areas will be properly identified so they may qualify for assistance programs. ESRI's tools let governments respond more effectively. In addition, geocoding and analysis done with GIS lets regional and state govern- ments suggest block and tract splits so that boundaries will make more sense and give the Census Bureau a more complete picture of where population centers are located. Continued on page 6 Government Matters I Census 2000 Solutions Providers ThefollowingESRI business partnerscan help state and local governments par- ticipate more effectively in Census 2000. They provide applications, consulting services, and data that work with SSRI productsand data. Digital Engineering Corporation Digital Engineering Corporation (DEC) is an applications software firm focused on the devel- opment of GIS technologies. DEC, a certified ESRI technology developer has been providing GIS solutions and technical services to private and governmententities worldwide for more than 12 years. DEC provides single source solutions for clients with specialized requirements for high performance computer systems. DEC's professional redistricting and reapportionment system, autoBound, creates balanced regions using point or polygon data. DEC's primary GIS products are A/VReports Pro, ANNotify, and autoBound. • ANReports Pro is a report writing extension that integrates Crystal Reports with ArcView GIS. • A/VNotify is a location -based notification and mailing list management system. • autoBound, DEC's professional redistricting and reapportionment system application, creates balanced regions using point or polygon data. Additional information on DEC's products and services can be obtained at :w✓.,fi� ii:;r'c n:;r,.corrs or by contacting DEC at 410-715-2300. 2 Government Matters Election Data Services, Inc. Election Data Services, Inc. (EDS), is a Wash- ington, D.C.-based consulting firm specializing in redistricting, election administration, and the analysis and presentation of census and political data. The firm was founded in 1977 and main- tains nationwide databases on election returns, election administration, and voting equipment. In addition to redistricting software, the firm of- fers political information products that include files of congressional and state legislative dis- trict boundaries and a ZIP+DISTRICT database linking district boundaries to postal ZIP Codes. EDS has developed the six solutions based on ArcView GIS for state and local governmental organizations participating in census programs. • REMAP 2000 Redistricting software redraws electoral districts using population data from the year 2000 census and includes tools to analyze redistricting plans and generate maps and reports. • BBSP (Block Boundary Suggestion Project) software—Census 2000 Redistricting Data Program for Phase 1 tags TIGER/Line segments as 2000 census block boundaries and generates BBSP equivalency files and sketch maps of TIGER feature updates for the Census Bureau. • VTDP (Voting District Project) software— Phase 2 of the Census 2000 Redistricting Data Program maps voting and electoral districts and generates polygon equivalency files for the Census Bureau as well as creating sketch maps for TIGER feature updates. • VERIFY software—Census 2000 Redistrict- ing Data Program analyzes TIGER/Line files and verifies the accuracy of Phase 1 BBSP and Phase 2 VTDP submissions to the Census Bureau. • TAZ-UP (Traffic Analysis Zone Update) software -2000 Census Transportation Planning Package (CTPP) maps traffic analysis zones (TAZ) and generates polygon equivalency files for the Census Bureau in addition to generating sketch maps for TIGER feature updates. PRECIS from EDS redraws precincts using TIGERILine basemap and geocoded voter data. • PRECIS Precinct Information System redraws voting districts (precincts) using a TIGER/Line basemap and geocoded voter data and generates maps, reports, and street files for voter registration systems. Visit the EDS Web site at dnrn mlrrur}< r ._ c .;.Carrs or contact them by phone at 202-789-2004. A Little Help from Your Friends Other GIS professionals in state and local government are often the very best source of information on innovative ways to use GIS, solve problems, or handle day-to-day operations. There are several ways to net- work with your GIS peers. a Visit the Online Local Government Discussion Forum. Discussion topics are determined by the participants. Access the forum through the State and Local Government industry page (wwwesri.com/industries/localgov/) at the ESRI Web site. • Join the ESRI Local Government User Group or one of the dozens of independent regional user groups. These groups meet throughout the year to share information, data, tips on software usage, and project news. Information on regional and special interest user groups is available at vvvvw esri, com/usersuq oortluserarouos! userarosro html or from your local ESRI regional office in the United States or an international distributor if you are outside the United States. s the decennial census approaches, states are again preparing to redraw electoral districts to ensure equal rep- resentation in Congress and state legislatures. The scheming, bargaining, and backroom deals that characterize the process in some states have caused it to be called "the purest of political blood sports" [New York Times]. This aspect of redistricting has largely been eliminated in the State of Iowa. In Iowa, a nonpartisan legislative agency—the Legislative Service Bureau (LSB)—is charged with redrawing congres- sional and legislative districts. Professional Redistricting The professional staff of the LSB provides bill drafting and research services to the commit- tees and members of the Iowa General Assem- bly as well as preparing and presenting congres- sional and legislative redistricting plans to both houses of the General Assembly. The Iowa Code requires the LSB to prepare and deliver three congressional and legislative dis- trict plans to the General Assembly. The first and second plans must be either accepted with- out amendment or rejected. The third plan can be amended. If no plan is adopted prior to Sep- tember 15, the Iowa Constitution provides that the Iowa Supreme Court shall cause the State to be redistricted. Iowa's Redistricting Standards The Iowa Code contains strict standards that must be adhered to by the LSB in drafting a re- districting plan. Districts must be nearly equal in population and the maximum variances al- lowed are stipulated. The division of counties and cities between districts is discouraged. The goal is to create as few divisions as possible. Districts must be composed of contiguous terri- tory and be compact in form. The Code pre- scribes a length–width compactness standard. The LSB may not use data such as the addresses of incumbent members, political affiliation of voters, results from prior elections, or demo- graphic data other than head counts except as required by federal laws and the Constitution though this type of data is typically part of a redistricting database. Taking the Politics Out of Redistricting Redistricting in 1990 This process works! Iowa was the first state with more than one congressional district to complete the 1990 round of redistricting. The LSB ob- tained software and a database from Election Data Services Inc. (EDS) to draft the new congressional and legislative district plans. EDS software included special functions such as a compactness report that applied the length– width compactness standard in the Iowa Code to districts. The database used to create the dis- trict contained no political data but did include a unique feature—Redistricting Data Units (RDUs). PRECIS Map Tools simplifies map production once new precincts have been drawn. RDUs are the basic building blocks for creating districts in Iowa. They consist mostly of elec- tion precincts keyed to total population counts from the census. Using RDUs rather than census blocks speeds map drawing and further removes politics from the process. RDUs cover a larger area than census blocks and are often composed of whole political subdivisions or recognized election districts. To assist the legislature in evaluating the redis- tricting plans drafted by the LSB, EDS also pro- vided identical databases to Republican and Democratic caucuses of the General Assembly. These databases included political data such as election results, voters' party affiliation, and in- cumbent members' addresses so that legislators could analyze the political ramifications of the new redistricting plans. Preparing for Redistricting 2000 The LSB is currently preparing for year 2000 redistricting by participating in the Census 2000 Redistricting Data Program. In Phase 1 of the program, called the Block Boundary Suggestion Project (BBSP), the LSB is using an EDS appli- cation based on ArcView GIS. This software enables the LSB to participate electronically in BBSP. EDS, the State's redistricting vendor in 1990, also provided the LSB with a database of current election precincts. Using the ArcView GIS -based BBSP software, the LSB will prepare submissions to the Census Bureau indicating which geographic features in the TIGER/Line files form boundaries of elec- tion precincts and should be retained as block boundaries for the year 2000 census. The LSB also uses the BBSP software to generate sketch maps that can be annotated with corrections or missing features and submitted to the Census Bureau as proposedTIGER/Line feature updates. EDS is also providing the LSB with software for electronic participation in Phase 2 of the Redistricting Data Program—the Voting District Project (VTDP). The LSB will use the ArcView GIS -based VTDP software to prepare polygon files of current election precincts and legislative districts for submission to the Census Bureau. The submissions will entitle the State to receive population counts for those geographic units for redistricting from the year 2000 census, The LSB will be able to reuse the election pre- cinct boundaries database from the Census 2000 Redistricting Data Program to prepare the data- base for year 2000 redistricting. The precincts will be available with other units of the census geography to construct a new set of RDUs for the year 2000 redistricting database. For more information, please contact Kim Brace Election Data Services, Inc. 12251 Street, N. W., Suite 700 Washington, DC 20005-3954 Tel.: 201-789-2004, Fax: 202-789-2007 E-mail: kbrace&olcom Government Matters 3 GIS Solutions for Census 2000 The Census 2000 Redistricting Data Pro- gram, created as a result of Public Law 94-171, is a Census Bureau program that provides states with the information necessary to create legislative districts with balanced popu- lations. Digital Engineering Corporation's autoBound Intelligent Redistricting software, which works as an extension to ESRI's ArcView GIS software, helps states participate effectively in the Census 2000 Redistricting Data Program. This program is executed in three phases. Phase 1, the Block Boundary Suggestion Project (BBSP), allows states to submit maps or equivalency files that suggest features such as roads, rivers, or ridgelines that should be maintained in estab- lishing census block boundaries. Completed maps are returnedby the Census Bureau so states can verify the locations of the features they suggested. The Census Bureau provides expla- nations in cases where suggested features were not included. In Phase 2, the Voting District Project (VTDP), the Census Bureau delivers hard -copy maps and electronic files to the states displaying all the features to be used in the creation of census blocks. Participating states outline their election precincts using the features shown on these maps and return the maps or files to the Census Bu- reau. Phase 2 provides states with population totals based on their election precincts. Phase 3, the Data Delivery phase, is required by Public Law 94-171. The Census Bureau provides each state with population totals by race, ori- gin, and voting age for counties; American In- dian areas; cities; towns; county subdivisions; census tracts; block groups; and blocks. States participating in Phase 2 will also receive these population totals for their election precincts. Phase 2 redistricting was currently scheduled to begin in January of 1999. In this phase the Cen- sus Bureau will provide TIGER/Line files and/ or hardcopy maps for each state. TIGER/Line files are digital database files of geographic fea- tures. In order to use these files, states must have a GIS capable of importing TIGER/Line data. 4 Govemmew Matters AutoBound Intelligent Redistricting software's TIGER import tool makes TIGER/Line data ac- cessible. Once the TIGER/Line files are im- ported, states can use these files to delineate their election precincts. The states are responsible for submitting existing election precinct lines in Phase 2. For most states, these lines have been "frozen" for a period of time. For example, the State of Nevada, one of autoBound's Phase 2 users, has its precinct lines frozen during the years ending in the numeral six until the years ending in numeral one for each census period. Consequently, its precinct lines have remained unchanged since 1996. Use autoBound to balance voting districts. California and South Dakota are the only states not participating in Phase 2. South Dakota has already selected autoBound as its software for Census 2000 redistricting. When the Census Bu- reau delivers population data for Census 2000, the states not participating will receive data for census blocks, census tracts, and other geographic areas, but not for their election precincts. States have several reasons for participating in Phase 2. The most obvious reason is that they will have population totals by race, origin, and voting age for their election precincts, which is helpful for redistricting. Participation in Phase 2 also familiarizes each state with the TIGER/Line files. Although its format may slightly change by the time of final Phase 3 redistricting, the importing done for Phase 2 allows states to fine- tune redistricting techniques. According to Kathy Steinle, GIS specialist with the Nevada Legislative Counsel Bureau, "par- ticipation in Phase 2 will prepare us for the task of redistricting, which is usually under a time crunch." Nevada must complete its redistrict- ing plan by the end of the legislative session in 2001. The session runs from February to May, and the Census Bureau will have the data avail- able by April. At best, they only have a few months to determine the redistricting plan and don't want to waste time on technical issues. AutoBound, which runs in conjunction with ArcView GIS, provides the tools necessary for performing Phase 2 from start to finish. First, autoBound provides a TIGER import tool that allows TIGER files to be imported by county. The autoBound interface displays a seamless view of geographic features across county boundaries. In addition, requirements for Phase 2, as set forth in the Census Bureau's Phase 2 Tech- nical Guidelines, have been incorporated into the functionality of autoBound. By spring 1999, most states will have made a decision on Phase 2 software. Those who have chosen autoBound will not only step smoothly through Phase 2 but will also be a step ahead for the redistricting process. AutoBound's inte- gration with ESRI's ArcView GIS provides a comprehensive turnkey solution for the Census 2000 Redistricting Data Program. For more information, please contact Monica Dombrowski Digital Engineering Corporation 5525 Twin Knolls Road, Suite 321 Columbia, Maryland 21045, USA Tel.: 410-715-2300, Fax: 410-715-5507 The 2000 census is critical to delivering government services. Representation and funding on all levels of government are determined by census data. Long-range planning of all types is predicated on census results. ESRI geographic information sys- tem (GIS) software solutions offer the right tools to analyze and present population and housing statistics. Whether you're looking for solutions for redistricting, participating in localized pre -census programs, or communicating data to your constituents via an Intranet or Internet, ESRI° can provide the best solution to meet your needs. ESRI solu- tions range from desktop to organization -wide systems. Call ESRI today to learn how GIS can help you de- velop better strategies for participating in the census. 7; 7 li I� 1-888.603-3207 wwwesricom�ocalgov 0, ;T. E-mail: info@esri.com Free TIGER" data at ArcData'" Online. eopydgh 101111 lm;rnnm .Asyzl Rech GUW urt Jnc. A 11 rights ramie d. ESRI and Arevim .a trndenurVs 1 drna Int Sy ms Nav rch lis e, Inc regizl rcd in the Uniiad Sla oat cr eg other unr riz s pa dings innlhe Y: ,peon Cin niiil: dha• FSRI glnhe Ing r.,d.n .rA-drArcO.,la and'1 rIre urds r! F nd—n'l S),(,.,, Rexard, I ,Alnm, Inc Other mmpan ez and p,Mucls .—Ii -M her m , l ide ,.,, .. orregi.ie� d IrnAen�nrAs of Il,.•ir n pnli, a IrademnrA ��.nen. Goeemment Matters 5 iy y� Mw ~ �y 4rdi93h $ or �rl�i . Av,j The 2000 census is critical to delivering government services. Representation and funding on all levels of government are determined by census data. Long-range planning of all types is predicated on census results. ESRI geographic information sys- tem (GIS) software solutions offer the right tools to analyze and present population and housing statistics. Whether you're looking for solutions for redistricting, participating in localized pre -census programs, or communicating data to your constituents via an Intranet or Internet, ESRI° can provide the best solution to meet your needs. ESRI solu- tions range from desktop to organization -wide systems. Call ESRI today to learn how GIS can help you de- velop better strategies for participating in the census. 7; 7 li I� 1-888.603-3207 wwwesricom�ocalgov 0, ;T. E-mail: info@esri.com Free TIGER" data at ArcData'" Online. eopydgh 101111 lm;rnnm .Asyzl Rech GUW urt Jnc. A 11 rights ramie d. ESRI and Arevim .a trndenurVs 1 drna Int Sy ms Nav rch lis e, Inc regizl rcd in the Uniiad Sla oat cr eg other unr riz s pa dings innlhe Y: ,peon Cin niiil: dha• FSRI glnhe Ing r.,d.n .rA-drArcO.,la and'1 rIre urds r! F nd—n'l S),(,.,, Rexard, I ,Alnm, Inc Other mmpan ez and p,Mucls .—Ii -M her m , l ide ,.,, .. orregi.ie� d IrnAen�nrAs of Il,.•ir n pnli, a IrademnrA ��.nen. Goeemment Matters 5 earn how state and local government pro- fessionals are preparbtgfor Census 2000 by attending these paper presentations at this year's ESRI international User Corference. By Michel A. Lettre, MSc. Maryland Office of Planning -Planning Data Services The Maryland Office of Planning, the principal agency providing technical assistance to 18 counties and their municipalities participating in the Census Bureau's 1998 LUCA program, has developed ArcView GIS -based project files that work with a State-wide property database called MdProperty View. Continued from page I Critical to Long -Term Planning Census information gives local governments a handle on change. Whether predicting service demands for police and fire protection, devel- oping housing elements for master plans, or per- forming any of the other major tasks of city development, governments need to acquire, analyze, and disseminate census data efficiently. ArcExplorer and ArcView GIS provide users with ready access to census data. With ArcView GIS and extension software such as ArcView Spatial Analyst, ArcView 3D Analyst, and ArcView Network Analyst, census data can be manipulated and classified from the desktop. Data for more extensive jurisdictions can be managed using ARC/INFO. Using MapObjects Starter Applications, governments of all sizes can quickly publish census data on Intranets or the Internet. Internet technology is especially helpful to governments trying to publish data from the Public Law File, the initial data report generated by the Census Bureau. 6 Government Matters By John K Wildgen, Ph.D. University of New Orleans -Urban and Regional Affairs Since the mid 90s, a series of Supreme Court deci- sions has started to develop the notion of "commu- nity of interest" as an additional criterion of fair districting. This paper explores some techniques bor- rowed from remote -sensing approaches and map algebra to help those performing redistricting with this hard -to -quantify and hard -to -map concept. By Christopher Williamson, Ph.D. GIS Distance Learning Program -Geography Department Local governments will need to develop legally defendable decisions and policies regarding the use of census data with known undercounts and/or ad- justed census data—and use the data carefully. Pre - Improved Redistricting Changes in population necessitate redrawing the political boundaries from city council districts to congressional districts. Governments that have establishedGIS programs have begun using GIS to handle redistricting. GIS has changed this process from an arduous and lengthy manual operation to one in which many scenarios can be rapidly modeled to arrive at the best avail- able solution. Expertise in redistricting is available from a variety of SSRI business partners. Visit to learn more about products and services that help state and local governments deal effectively with the 2000 Census. Working for a Better Count In addition to assisting governments in using census data, ESRI continues to help the Census Bureau coordinate the enumeration and commu- nicate and analyze the results. The Census Bureau is distributing Census Mapper, a version ofArcExplorer packaged with select tables from the 1997 Statistical Abstract of the United States, liminary results of a national survey of municipal planners who use census data shows that skills in evaluating census data quality and making ad- justments are little known and not perceived as a high priority training need. By Kevin Gainey North Carolina Centerfor Geographic Informa- tion and Analysis The North Carolina General Assembly's Informa- tion Systems Division is responsible for enabling State legislators, legal counsel, and Division staff to draw and analyze political districts. A main- frame system was used in the 1990 census. The Division is developing a similar application using Microsoft Visual Basic and MapObjects for a PC platform. This new application will increase effi- ciency, flexibility, stability, and scalability within the Windows environment for the upcoming 2000 census. free of charge as part of a cooperative research and development agreement between ESRI and the Census Bureau. Census Mapper will allow users to explore data to reveal hidden spatial pat- terns, relationships, and trends. As part of another cooperative agreement, ESRI and IBM are jointly developing the Data Ac- cess Dissemination System (DADS), which will supply unparalleled access to the data collected in the 2000 survey. Users will be able to query geographic, demographic, economic, and other data via the Web and generate thematic maps. This increase in customer service will also reduce costs for the Bureau. This system will support a large number of users including congressional, White House, and Census staff. ESRI's support of Census 2000 with the best in GIS technology will help improve the accuracy of the count and the dissemination of this im- portant information. Just a Thought... on the 2000 Census Continued from page I In those years, the word GIS was not typically included in the job titles of professionals in state and local governments. Robert and I toyedaround with the idea of taking the database I had created and having the "machine" isolate a geographic area, compare it with the census numbers, and identify areas that showed differences. Although this process seems unremarkable in a world where GIS is becoming more and more commonplace, at that time nobody had ever really used GIS for census -related work at a local government level. By developing a program that did nothing more than report back problem areas, we identified over 650 housing units the Census Bureau had missed, which would have cost the City $2,000,000 in lost State and fed- eral funding over a I0 -year period. Not bad for a first try. On the basis of this success, Robert and I became mesmerized by the potential of the ESRI technology and embarked on an effort to implement GIS in all the City's activities. Fast Forward to the 2000 Census The decennial census has descended upon us once again, and it's exciting to know that ESRI solutions can and will play an important role in assisting state and local government agencies in securing more accurate population and hous- ing counts. Though some programs have changed, the goal of assisting the Census Bureau in this massive undertaking remains the same. As census statistics become available, govern- ment agencies will need effective methods for making sense of the data. ArcView GIS is al- ready being used by municipal and county agen- cies participating in precensus programs such as the Boundary and Annexation Survey, Local Update of Census Addresses (LUCA), and re- than $01 million on a single 11),rolject." -Christopher Thomas. GIS Coordinator. Cin, of Ontario, California. Subscribe to > Receive this newsletter free of charge. Fax this form to 1-909-307-3051 or mail to ... SSRI Dept. 1600 380 New York Street GOVERNMENT ATTERS Name Title Organization Department. Address City Phone Fax Redlands, CA 92373-8100 1 E-mail USA districting. After the census is complete, gov- ernments can use the MapObjects Internet Starter Applications' demographic browser to disseminate demographic data throughout their organizations and to the public. Laying a Solid Foundation Working on the census can jump-start a government's GIS program. The necessary com- ponents for census work—street networks, address files, census tract boundary files, and demographic data—are the basis for GIS appli- cations throughouta government.The work done for the census can produce immediate results in the form of maps that show population locations and demographics to decision makers. If you recognize the potential for leveraging your work, the census can be the best thing that ever hap- pened to your government's GIS. Order Your Reprint While supplies last, you can get a free copy of "Census 2000: Counting on GIS, " an article reprinted from American City & County magazine that describes how the Census Bureau and governments across the United States are using GISfor Census 2000. Call 1-300-447-97"8 or send an E-mail to in ),'k:esri. evin to reserve your copy. State 1-11 am a user of ESRI software. ZIP Government Matters 7 81691 INLD32M3/99ai 8 Government Matters For more information about GIS solutions for state and local government or for a reseller near you, call 1-800-447-9778 within the United States, or 1-909-793-2853, ext. 1-1235, outside the United States. Visit the ESRI Web site at www.es?-i.com Send inquiries to Chris Thomas, State and Local Government Solutions Manager, atcthomas@esri.con: Copyright © 1999 Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. ESRI, MapObjects, ARC/]NFO, ArcCAD, and Arc View are trademarks of Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., registered in the United States and certain other countries; registration is pending in the European Community. AML, 3D Analyst, ArcExplorer, and the ESRI globe logo are trademarks and ArcData, www.esri.com, and @esri.com are service marks of Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. Other companies and products mentioned herein arc trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective trademark owners. dsn OM-ELEZ6 2IUJ0}IIeD 'Spuplpa� WaJIS IJOA MaN 08E 1153 S11311t1� AIWWAOS DENT OF CDM M V F UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Bureau of the Census ® Regional Office Detroit, Michigan 48232-5405 'mss cr, February 23, 2001 The Honorable David C. Hollister Mayor of Lansing 124 W. Michigan Avenue Lansing, MI 48933 Dear Mayor Hollister: In the next few weeks, Census 2000 redistricting data (Public Law 94-171) will be released for your state and local area. These data on population, age, and race will be available for all jurisdictions within each state, including data at the block level. This information will be accessible through our website (www. census.gov) by April 1, 2001. In addition to the raw census numbers, Commerce Secretary, Donald L. Evans, will determine if "corrected" numbers reflecting an adjustment for errors within the Census will also be released at the same time. Starting in June 2001, population counts and basic data will be available on all people and housing units. This information includes age, sex, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, household relationship, and owner/renter status of the residence. Other data products with detailed characteristic information will be released on a flow basis from June 2001 through 2003. Data will be accessible through the Internet, on CD-ROM or DVD, and in printed reports. Thank you for your ongoing support of Census 2000. We will continue to keep you informed of upcoming data release dates as appropriate. If you have any questions, please contact our local staff at (800) 564-3978. Sincerely, Dwight P. Dean Regional Director o M z 0 �tz b � n M I C-- rr C o U, rDo � � d C n '� c c rD N rD En O = --i-) n n Ln O En n rD w 0 h"S � O� rrt C� �F-t • O n� C/1 � N � O � O O CD ry n rrt rrt ■ c .,, N Y+w i ■ Strength. in Numbers Your Guide to Census 2000 Redistricting Data From the U.S. Census Bureau Strength in Numbers Once every 10 years, Americans stand up to be counted. Down- town and out-of-town, in the moun- tains and on the farms, we speak up and let our governments know that we intend to be represented in the decisions that they make. The census gives us an opportu- nity to be part of the democratic process. Census numbers ensure that our representative districts—for the U.S. Congress and for state legis- latures, and in our city and town governments—reflect our numbers, north or south, cast or west. This brochure explains where census numbers come from and the role they have in the way states and localities redraw the boundaries of their legislative districts. We look in particular at the maps and numbers that state governments and others get from the Census Bureau and use in redistricting. Why a Census? The U.S. Census Bureau, part of the U.S. Department of Commerce, conducts the decennial census and issues population numbers. But there was a census long before the Census Bureau was created in 1902. The first census was taken in 1790. Article 1, Section 2, of the U.S. Constitution established that the apportionment of the U.S. House of Representatives shall be based upon a national census. The census has many other important uses. It affects our lives in ways we don't often realize. The road you take to work each day, the hospital that serves your commu- nity, the schools your children attend, the products your grocery stocks—all these have been influ- enced by the census. Governments use census statis- tics, for example, in planning needed highways or in locating new services or schools. Businesses use census numbers in marketing new products and locating new stores. The imagination is the only limit upon the uses of the statistics that come out of the census. The imagination is the only limit upon the uses of the statistics that come out of the census. The Census at a Glance In early March 2000, the U.S. Postal Service delivered a letter to households announcing that Census 2000 is coming and alerting every- one to watch for their census form. The Census 2000 questionnaires arrived shortly thereafter and the Census Bureau asked us all to return our forms by Saturday, April 1, 2000. We used enumerators to take the census in rural areas and check on questionnaires that had not been returned by mail in more populous areas. The forms are mailed back to a processing center where digital scanners read the unique bar code on the questionnaire through the envelope window to record its return status. The questionnaires themselves were sent to one of four processing offices where they were optically scanned and converted to digital images. All information will be further processed and tabulated at the Census Bureau's secure com- puter center in Bowie, Maryland. Finally, the Census Bureau generates statistical data for you to use in redistricting and in many other ways. Media to bring you the data will include printed reports, but the major media will be CD-ROM and the American FactFinder (the Bureau's new data access and dis- semination system) on the Internet at www.census.gov. U.S. Census Bureau Kenneth Prewitt, Director William G. Barron, Deputy Director Paula J. Schneider, Principal Associate Director for Programs Census 2000 Redistricting Data Office Marshall L. Turner, Chief Cathy C. McCully, Assistant Chief Confidentiality Is a Must Title 13 of the United States Code contains the laws governing the Census Bureau. Section 9 of Title 13 assures the confidentiality of information gathered by the Census Bureau. It specifies that neither the Secretary of Commerce nor any other officer or employee of the Department of Commerce—in fact, no one—may use the informa- tion furnished under the provisions of this title for any purpose other than the statistical purposes for which it is supplied. The law also states that no Census Bureau tabulation can iden- tify any particular establishment or individual and that no one other than the sworn officers and employ- ees of the Census Bureau can exam- ine information supplied in re- sponse to censuses and surveys. Only after 72 years are the census schedules opened to public inspec- tion and use. Redistricting Must Aim at Equality The decennial census has played a crucial role in the appor- tionment of the Congress for more than two centuries. But it is only in the last 25 years that the Census Bureau has played a major role in the redistricting process. U.S. Supreme Court decisions handed down during the 1960s clarified the Constitution's intention to provide equality of representa- tion for all Americans. In 1964, the Wesberry v. Sanders decision held that, "as nearly as is practicable one person's vote in a congressional election is to be worth as much as another's." That same year, in Reynolds v. Sims, the Court ruled that state legislative districts must be "as nearly of equal population as is practicable." Both U.S. congressional districts and state legislative districts must be drawn so that their residents have a fair and equal share in the way they are governed. These Supreme Court decisions increased the states' need for geo- graphically detailed census informa- tion in the redistricting process. The urgency of the states' need for these data led the Congress to pass Public Law (P.L.) 94-171 in December 1975. Later on, we'll discuss the rami- fications of P.L. 94-171 more fully. First, we'll look briefly at the census itself—the important first step in the redistricting process. Taking the Census Before we look at the statistics and maps that states will use in redistricting, let's look at the census itself—the undertaking through which we gather the statistics. We began to prepare for the 22nd decennial census long before 2000. For the public, however, the process began in March 2000 when census questionnaires were mailed to most households in the United States. In some rural areas, census takers delivered questionnaires. People filled out the questionnaire by April 1, 2000—Census Day—and returned them, by mail. In some instances, census takers visited the household to collect the census information. Apportionment Is the Fundamental Use According to the Constitution, the census has one fundamental pur- pose: to ensure that the representation of each state in the U.S. House of Rep- resentatives reflects the relative size of its population as compared with other states. There are 435 representatives divided up among the 50 states. Each one of these representatives is elected by the voters of a congressional district. Populous states have more repre- sentatives than less populous states. In the 1061'' Congress, California had 52 representatives. Wyoming, our least populous state, had just one. The map on this page shows how many repre- sentatives each state had as a result of the 1990 census. "Apportionment" is the process of determining how many representatives each state is entitled to. How do we at the U.S. Census Bureau figure in this process? Our role is twofold—to con- duct the census and, as a part of the Executive Branch, to calculate the apportionment based upon the census results. Once we take the census and compile the results, we then use the method of equal proportions (see map, right) to determine the number of representatives each state received after the 1990 census. In conducting the census, we hire enumerators working out of more than 520 local census offices nationwide. In processing the ques- tionnaires, we use four data capture centers. People living in populous areas, where most of us live, mail their forms directly to a data capture center. In less populous areas, cen- sus staff will leave a questionnaire at each household for people to fill out and mail back in a postage paid envelope. The data capture centers are located in Essex, MD; Jeffersonville, IN; Phoenix, AZ; and Pomona, CA. As soon as the forms reach the data capture centers, the clock starts ticking for the Census Bureau. These centers use scanners to record the arrival of the questionnaires on computers, so we can keep an auto- mated list of forms returned and those still outstanding. The data capture centers use optical scanners to capture a picture of the questionnaire forms and ex- tract the data. Once we have com- pleted the processing of the census forms, we begin to compile final data in the Census Bureau's Washington offices. Census Day, April 1, 2000, may be our most conspicuous dead- line, but it's not our only one. Now we face several deadlines in process- ing the final census counts. The Department of Commerce and the Census Bureau will provide Census 2000 counts to the President and the states by the deadlines set forth in Title 13 of the United States Code (U.S.C.) Section 141 (b) and (c). By December 31, 2000, the Secretary of Commerce and the Census Bureau But our job doesn't end there. "One person/one vote" court decisions and legislation have given the Census Bureau a major role in redistricting, the process by which state govern- ments redraw U.S. congressional and state legislative districts. In 1990, the South and West Gained Seats! Changes in Apportionment Resulting From the 1990 Census (Number in Parentheses is each state's current total of U.S. Representatives.) "...as nearly as is practicable one person's vote in a congressional election is to be worth as much as another's." Director will report the total popula- tion counts by state to the Presi- dent. By April 1, 2001, the Director will provide the detailed population counts for all areas within each state to the governor and legislative leaders, under the provisions of Public Law 94-171. Off to the President Next, the Census Bureau must prepare the final, official state population counts required for the apportionment of the U.S. House of Representatives. These official counts are reported to the President on or before December 31, 2000, a brief 9 months after Census Day. According to the U.S. Code, the President must then report these figures to the Congress. He does this in early January 2001, during the first week of the 10711 Congress. This report will show: • the population of each state • the number of representatives apportioned to each state The apportionment section of the U.S. Code also tells the steps that are to be followed after the Congress receives the President's report. Within 15 calendar days, the Clerk of the House of Representa- tives must send to each state's governor a certificate showing how many representatives the state may send to the next Congress. Method of Equal Proportions Guides Apportionment How does the method of equal proportions work? Adopted in 1941 (United States Code, Title 2, Section 2a), the method of equal proportions requires us to compile a priority list of states. Priority value is determined by dividing a state's population by the geometric mean of its current and next House seats. For example, following the 1990 census, each of the 50 states was awarded 1 seat out of the current 435 total. Then, the 5151 seat went to the state that had the highest priority value for its second seat. In computing the apportion- ment from the 1990 state totals, seat 51 went to California, whose priority value under the method of equal proportions was 21,099,536. The next seat, num- ber 52, went to New York, with a second -seat priority value of 12,759,392; California received seat number 53, with priority value of 12,181,823; and Texas received seat number 54, with a priority value of 12,063,104. Once the number of seats assigned to the individual states is determined, the task of draw- ing the new congressional dis- tricts is generally that of each state legislature. I,l Changes in Apportionment Resulting from the 1990 Census 1� Tula) US Rego W tk-:135 "- —� Sble 41NKxW In Ile Nora __� Slaro bslKxab lu tle Hwx _J Ib tluKa J,,,, f fid,. a Isl 1 � i.l iil 1 � � fl itl W `�- 1x1 3 m s I Rb _ z x,nNbW MYt apnxnlatlet "...as nearly as is practicable one person's vote in a congressional election is to be worth as much as another's." Director will report the total popula- tion counts by state to the Presi- dent. By April 1, 2001, the Director will provide the detailed population counts for all areas within each state to the governor and legislative leaders, under the provisions of Public Law 94-171. Off to the President Next, the Census Bureau must prepare the final, official state population counts required for the apportionment of the U.S. House of Representatives. These official counts are reported to the President on or before December 31, 2000, a brief 9 months after Census Day. According to the U.S. Code, the President must then report these figures to the Congress. He does this in early January 2001, during the first week of the 10711 Congress. This report will show: • the population of each state • the number of representatives apportioned to each state The apportionment section of the U.S. Code also tells the steps that are to be followed after the Congress receives the President's report. Within 15 calendar days, the Clerk of the House of Representa- tives must send to each state's governor a certificate showing how many representatives the state may send to the next Congress. Method of Equal Proportions Guides Apportionment How does the method of equal proportions work? Adopted in 1941 (United States Code, Title 2, Section 2a), the method of equal proportions requires us to compile a priority list of states. Priority value is determined by dividing a state's population by the geometric mean of its current and next House seats. For example, following the 1990 census, each of the 50 states was awarded 1 seat out of the current 435 total. Then, the 5151 seat went to the state that had the highest priority value for its second seat. In computing the apportion- ment from the 1990 state totals, seat 51 went to California, whose priority value under the method of equal proportions was 21,099,536. The next seat, num- ber 52, went to New York, with a second -seat priority value of 12,759,392; California received seat number 53, with priority value of 12,181,823; and Texas received seat number 54, with a priority value of 12,063,104. Once the number of seats assigned to the individual states is determined, the task of draw- ing the new congressional dis- tricts is generally that of each state legislature. .For the first time, desktop and laptop computers will play a major role in the redistricting process. Geographic and population data on compact disc (CD-ROM) will allow users with a PC to map out district boundaries. In the photo above, Census Geography staff members John Byle, Jamie Rosenson, Bob LaMacchia, and Donna Zorn study a map drawn using coordinates from the Census Bureau's TIGER/Files. " The Redistricting Process Begins But wait! The clock is still ticking! The Census Bureau still has another important deadline to meet. In December 1975, the Congress passed Public Law 94-171. This law requires the Census Bureau to make special preparations to provide redistricting data no later than April 1, 2001, to the 50 states. Public Law 94-171 specifies that within 1 year of Census Day, the Census Bureau must Send each state the data it will need to redraw dis- tricts for the state legislature. P.L. 94-171 sets up a voluntary program between the Census Bureau and those states that wish to receive population tabulations for election precincts and other state specified geographic areas. Under this program, those responsible for the legislative ap- portionment or redistricting of each state may devise a plan identifying the voting areas for which they want the specific tabulations and submit it to the Census Bureau. This Census 2000 Redistricting Data Program has three phases. During Phase 1 (1996-1998), the Block Boundary Suggestion Project, state representatives reviewed base maps for the Census 2000 and suggested visible features to be used as census block boundaries. In early 1999, as part of Phase 2 (the Voting District Project), the Census Census 2000 Redistricting Data Program Ll State Phase 1 Phase 2 X = State submitted all counties for this phase of the program P = State did not submit all counties for this phase of the program VTD = Voting District SLD = State Legislative District Alabama X X (VPD and SLD) Alaska X X (VTD and SLD) Arizona P _ P (VTD and SLD) Arkansas P X (VTD only) California P Did not participate Colorado X X (VTD and SLD) Connecticut X X (VTD and SLD) Delaware X X (VTD and SLD) District of Columbia X X (VTD only) Florida Did not participate Did not participate Georgia X X (VTD and SLD) Hawaii P X (VTD only) Idaho P X (VTD and SLD) Illinois X X (VTD and SLD) Indiana X X (VTD and SLD) Iowa X X (VTD and SLD) Kansas X X (VTD and SLD) Kentucky X Did not participate Louisiana X X (VTD and SLD) Maine P X (VTD only) Maryland X X (VI'D only) Massachusetts P X (VTD and SLD) Michigan X X (VTD and SLD) Minnesota X X (VTD only) Mississippi X X (VTD and SLD) Missouri X X (VTD and SLD) Montana P Did not participate Nebraska X X (VTD and SLD Unicameral) Nevada X X (VTD and SLD) New Hampshire P X (VTD and SLD Senate only) New Jersey X X (VTD and SLD) New Mexico X X (VTD and SLD) New York P X (VTD and SLD) North Carolina P X (VTD and SLD) North Dakota Did not participate X (SLD only) Ohio X X (SLD only) Oklahoma X X (VTD and SLD) Oregon P X (SLD only) Pennsylvania P X (VTD and SLD) Rhode island Did not participate X (VTD and SLD) South Carolina X X (VTD and SLD) South Dakota Did not participate X (VTD and SLD) Tennessee P X (VTD and SLD) Texas X X (VTD only) Utah X X (VTD and SLD) Vermont P X (VTD and SLD) Virginia P X (VTD and SLD) Washington P X (VTD and SLD) West Virginia P X (VTD and SLD) Wisconsin P X (SLD only) Wyoming X X (VTD and SLD) Puerto Rico P X (VTD only) Phase 1, the Block Boundary Suggestion Project (BBSP) States assist in designing census blocks to correspond closely with local voting districts. Phase 2, the Voting District Project (VTDP) States submit voting district and state legislative district boundaries and associated information such as codes and names in order to receive Census 2000 data tabulations for these areas. Participation Rates 46 States in Phase 1 46 States in Phase 2 States with VTDs 44 States with SLDs 40 States with VTDs only 8 States with SLDs only 4 States with SLDs and VTDs = 33 Bureau sent each participating state a set of maps showing all the base features—roads, streams, legal boundaries, and so forth—that would form the framework of the census blocks for 2000. State officials drew boundaries on the base features that coincided with or approximated the bound- aries of voting districts. States optionally also provided their boundaries for their legislative districts, both senate and house districts. They returned the anno- tated maps with the voting and legislative district codes and names to the Census Bureau. As in Phase 1, some states chose to submit this boundary information using elec- tronic files. (See chart on page 4 for more information on participation.) During 1998 and 1999, the Census Bureau, in cooperation with the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), conducted a series of regional workshops at which Census Bureau staff and others briefed state officials on the Census 2000 Dress Rehearsal (con- ducted in 1998) P.L. 94-171 test data, redistricting case law, census geographic and subject matter terminology, and other reapportion- ment information. Marshall Turner, shown here with Cathy McCully, assistant chie(of the Census 2000 Redistricting Data Office, believes legislative staff in many states have become experts not only in applying the P.L. 94-171 data to districting but also in applying census data to the many other programs legislated bystate officials. Marshall Turner, chief of the Census 2000 Redistricting Data Office, notes, "The critical impor- tance of the census in redistricting is clearly reflected in the fact that state legislatures have developed increasing expertise in using the new technology of CD-ROMs and the Internet to carry out the steps in the redistricting process." P.L. 94-171 data include population counts for small areas within each state. After we provide the data, further action is up to the states. States are re- sponsible for delineating their own congressional and legislative boundaries and their legislatures, secretaries of state, governors, and redistricting commissions carry out the process. Tools To Do the Job When state officials begin `'"' ''' the difficult task of redrawing their districts, they'll have in hand several important tools: Census redistricting data consisting of — • statistical summaries on CD-ROM • county -based voting district/ state legislative district outline maps • county -based block maps that also show all levels of tabula- tion geography for P.L. 94-171 P.L. 94-171 statistical summaries have population totals and summa- ries by race, Hispanic or Latino, and voting age for all appropriate geo- graphic areas delimited on the maps: state, counties or equivalent areas, voting districts, county subdivisions, places, American Indian/Alaska Na- tive/Native Hawaiian areas, census tracts, block groups, and blocks. New for Census 2000, some states have delineated their existing legislative districts, and we will produce data for them as well. Public Law 94-171 Tabulations While P.L. 94-171 requires the Census Bureau to furnish only counts of the total population, additional data items also will be included. Since the inception of the Census Redistricting Data Program for the 1980 census, the Census Bureau has included summaries for the major race groups specified by the Statisti- cal Policy Office of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in Directive 15 (as issued in 1977). Those groups included White, Black, American Indian/Alaska Native, and Asian/Pacific Islander, plus "some other race." These race data were also cross -tabulated by Hispanic/ Non -Hispanic origin. At the request of the state legis- latures and the Department of jus- tice, for the 1990 Census Redistrict- ing Data Program, voting age (18 years old and over) was added to the cross -tabulation of race and Hispanic origin. It is important to take note that these three tabulation items— age, race, and Hispanic origin—are from the limited number of "short form" items that are asked of all households. New Race Data for Census 2000 Redistricting Data Program In the early 1990s, the OMB began a review of the 1977 Direc- tive 15 regarding the collection of Federal data on race and ethnicity with attention to the growing num- ber of persons who might wish to express their identity in terms of more than one of the Federal race categories. The OMB's review in- cluded solicitation of comments through notices in the Federal Regis- ter and public hearings, congres- sional input, formation of a inter- agency committee of technical and policy specialists from the agencies that collect and use Federal data on race and ethnicity, and research on how to collect data on multiple race responses. After several years of these efforts, in October 1997, the OMB issued a revision to Directive 15. The major revisions were: 1. The Asian/Pacific Islander category was divided into two: Asian Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 2. An instruction was added that allows respondents to "Mark one or more categories." 3. A separate question is to precede the race question to allow respondents to indicate whether or not they identify as Hispanic or Latino. Hispanic or Latino is not consid- ered a race category. Race data and Hispanic/Latino data are obtained from separate questions on the Census 2000 questionnaires. Since those who identify themselves as Hispanic also answer the race ques- tion, we can provide tabulations of their race characteristics. Under this new race concept the basic response categories for Census 2000 will be: • African American or Black • American Indian and Alaska Native • Asian • Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander • White • Some other race* *(Note: the OMB grants the Census Bureau permission to include this category). a Q— Q Census Statistics for 2000: The American FactFinder The American FactFinder is a new data access system that gives users facts and information about communities, the economy, and society. The interactive electronic system allows data users access to predefined data products, metadata, and online help, as well as the abil- ity to create custom data products online. This new dissemination method allows for quicker release of the detailed data users want. Users may access data and create their own reports. The American FactFinder cur- rently offers data from the 1990 Decennial Census, the 1997 Eco- nomic Census, data from the 2000 Dress Rehearsal Census, and the American Community Survey. It also will provide data from Census 2000. The large volumes of data collected by the Census Bureau require a large and efficient system of dissemination. The American FactFinder gives Census Bureau customers more flexibility to re- quest the data they need for their geography of interest. The Ameri- can FactFinder provides quicker release of detailed data about the Nation's people and the economy to meet the increasing needs of data users. To access the American FactFinder go to the Census Bureau home page at www.census.gov. You Need to Map Things Out! The data presented in the P.L. 94-171 data set won't mean much until you look at the accompanying maps and learn a little about the geographic areas. We've made the Census 2000 maps as clear as we can to convey the greatest detail about small areas. The maps are on as few map sheets as possible. The scale varies from county to county Voting District/State Legislative District Outline Map Here we display part of the voting district/ state legislative district outline map for Colum- bia, South Carolina. The outline maps identify the voting districts and optional state legislative districts and shote their boundaries. They are supplied, along with more detailed maps (see page 8) and the P.L. 94-171 tabulations, to state officials who will use them in the process of redrawing state legislative boundaries. i'? Visible features—such as roads, rivers, railroad tracks, etc., are shown and labeled only when they coincide with a voting district boundary or some other legal boundary. 16000 depending on area size and popula- tion density, and in many areas insets are used to ensure a readable map. A significant improvement is the use of color to distinguish the different types of area boundaries. What about plotted maps? The Census Bureau will provide both the majority and minority state house and senate legislative leaders and the governor with a set of Census 2000 P.L. 94-171 maps in early 2001. The Census Bureau estimates that nation- wide we will produce 75,000 unique county block maps, 15,000 unique voting district/state legislative dis- trict outline maps, and 12,000 census tract outline maps in order to support the Census 2000 Redistricting Data Program. 104 v '. �W �€ E✓.�L Acres 106 )63305 n ` QP 22 u°ide° to i/E°5tminster Dr Codes explained—the voting district areas identified by the states and used by the outline map identifies each district using up states and local governments for conducting s� e:°; r°°sr to a six character code. This map type also election districts, wards, or election precincts. uniquely identifies senate and house Voting district data are organized by county °CJ legislative districts where they were jg provided by the state: (t% --- - — h S° ly Dr o v' 88 ast° � Ry ac` Sehoor M° e Ra a s .9.i. St COLUMBIA 00702 104 v '. �W �€ E✓.�L Acres 106 )63305 n ` QP 22 u°ide° to i/E°5tminster Dr I Voting districts—is the generic term used for areas identified by the states and used by the states and local governments for conducting s� e:°; r°°sr elections. They may have other names, such as election districts, wards, or election precincts. Voting district data are organized by county °CJ within state. jg (t% I Think of the TIGER database, as provided in our TIGER/Line products, as a huge map of the United States. That's basically what it is—a map inside your desktop computer. It includes geographic coor- dinates (latitude and longitude) for visible features on the earth's surface—features such as roads, rail- roads, and streams. For most features, the TIGER/Line files also include attributes such as the names of the feature and for streets, the potential address range and associated ZIP+4 Code for each side of the street. The TIGER/Line files also include the boundaries and codes for all geographic areas for which the Census Bureau tabulates data including American Indian/Alaska Native areas, states, counties, townships, cities, and similar functioning general purpose governments. It also has the boundaries and codes for statistical areas (such as census tracts and census blocks) for which the Census Bureau collects and tabulates data. (TIGER stands for Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing. It is a registered trade- mark of the U.S. Census Bureau.) We developed the TIGER system jointly with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in the 1980s. We combined detailed USGS digital data (based on map sheets in which 1 inch equals approximately 1.6 miles) with digital data from the geographic base files (GBF/DIME files) used in the 1980 census. We continue to update the TIGER database (streets, address ranges, and political boundaries) based on information we obtain from local and tribal governments, the U.S. Postal Service, and our own field staff. Just before we tabulate the Census 2000 data, we will use the TIGER database to assign the block numbers for all census blocks in the entire Nation, using the updated base features and geographic area boundaries. This will best ensure that Census 2000 blocks are meaningful and represent the latest possible information. Because the TIGER database contains legal and statistical geographic areas and codes, and the underly- ing street network, you now have a powerful tool to display demographic data graphically. Using the TIGER/Line files (the public version of the TIGER database) and appropriate software, you can rapidly determine the impact on the demographic makeup of a district when you move a boundary. You can quickly perform this analysis at all levels, from city blocks to congressional districts. TIGER/Line files are county -based and will be available with all of the Census 2000 geographic codes, shortly before the Census 2000 data become available. All of the TIGER/Line files for the Nation fit on seven CD-ROMs (in compressed format). Uncompressed, the Nation is about 30 gigabytes of data. The smallest county is less than 1 megabyte in size, while the largest is over 100 megabytes. The largest state, Texas, is over 2 gigabytes in size. We made the maps using our TIGER system, an automated geo- graphic database the Census Bureau first developed for the 1990 census and updated and maintained to support all Census Bureau censuses and surveys, including Census 2000. Although we are supplying plotted maps to offices involved in redistricting, you also can get the maps and the geographic data to use with your geographic informa- tion system (GIS) or redistricting software, on CD-ROM. Data users easily can review maps against data without ever unfolding a map sheet! Voting district/state legisla- tive district outline maps—(see example, page 6) cover a county or equivalent area and show the out- line of voting districts and state legislative districts (if defined). These maps provide a quick picture of areas that can be used as a refer- ence as you construct new legisla- tive districts. These maps also will show the boundaries of the current state legislative districts (if the state chose to provide them during Phase 2). When greater detail is needed, county block maps (page 8) are the reference to consult. These maps show the smallest tabulation areas—census blocks—that can be used in the redistricting process. Map sheets are organized by county. For the block map, an index sheet shows the layout of the relationship between individual map sheets within the county. Inset Maps Give More Detail On the index map, you'll also notice shaded areas. They identify densely populated areas where the map detail calls for a larger scale. These shaded areas represent insets that are produced at a larger scale to show the base feature and geo- graphic detail on separate map sheets. Each inset shown on the index map is assigned a letter of the al- phabet; if the inset map is on more than one map sheet, then each component inset map sheet addi- tionally is assigned a number. For example, sheet A22 is sheet 22 of inset A. Many Uses! What else can you do with the TIGER geographic data? Much more than districting! It can serve as the geographic base in market forecast- ing and site selection, sales and transportation routing, emergency services planning, and school dis- trict planning. The TIGER database also contains ZCTAs—ZIP Code Tabulation Areas—new for Census 2000, to assist in relating ZIP Code based local information with Census 2000 demographic data at the cen- sus block level. Whether you work at home or the office, on your PC or the World Wide Web, information from the TIGER database is available to you. Not only can the Census Bureau's American FactFinder display TIGER data, but most of the Internet map- ping sites also started with TIGER/ Line file data. The Census Bureau has a very simple mapping program available, LANDView, available from the Internet or on CD-ROM or DVD. For redistricting or more compre- hensive mapping and analytical applications, the private sector has developed a wide variety of soft- ware. Look under "GIS" (Geographic Information Systems) or "Desktop Mapping" on the Internet, or visit the Census Bureau's web site for a list of vendors who support the TIGER/Line files. _ The maps will show voting dis- subdivided into census tracts. tricts and state legislative districts. These areas remain fairly constant The map will use the state -assigned from census to census and thus are F code of up to six -characters (without useful for longitudinal studies and leading zeros) for each voting district a variety of applications. within a given county. In addition, Legislative districts—are the house and senate codes of up to districts used to elect a member to three characters (without leading the upper (senate) or lower (house) ♦ zeros) are shown. chambers of state legislatures. Like i The legend is your guide to the voting districts, states could define symbols on the maps. these at their option. Consequently, 1 The areas you'll probably work the Census 2000 Redistricting Data with most are— will include state legislative dis- Votin districts—areas such as tricts for some states but not for Voting others. Please see chart on partici- election districts, wards, or precincts pation (page 4) for further informa- y r` identified by the states. They appear tion on how states participated in on separate voting district/state the definition of voting districts and fF\' legislative district outline maps and legislative districts. For more infor- r-. t on the county block maps. States motion, please call the Redistricting participating in the redistricting data Data Office on 301-457-4039 or / program provided the boundary, e-mail catherine.clark.mccully / code, and name information we used @ccmail.census.gov. in depicting these areas on the maps. The boundary is shown as a shaded Blocks—the smallest of census stippled pattern on this map but may geographic areas, normally bounded be different on the official Census by streets or other prominent physi- 2000 maps. As they do elsewhere on cal features or by the boundaries of Putting the Puzzle this map, voting district boundaries geographic areas. They may be as g small as a typical city block may coincide with boundaries of Together other areas such a incorporated bounded by 4 streets or as large as places, minor civil divisions, or cen- over 100 square miles in some rural The county block map sheets sus tracts, and they always follow a areas. Blocks are identified by a that we're illustrating here are large. four -digit number, unique within The standard sheet is 36" x 33." census block boundary. Census 2000 census tracts. Nation - When using maps like these, it is Census tracts—statistical areas ally, blocks average about 100 per - often helpful to study the index averaging about 4,000 people. sons each. sheet. Counties and equivalent areas are 88 4 Voting districts—areas such as election districts, wards, or precincts identified by the states. They appear on separate voting district/state legislative district outline maps and on'� the county block maps. States participating in the redistrict - d) ing data program provided the boundary, code, and name information we used in depicting these areas on the maps. The boundary is shown as a shaded stippled pattern on this map but may be different on the official Census 2000 maps. As they do elsewhere on this map, voting district boundaries may coincide with boundaries of other areas such as incorpo- 1001 rated places, minor civil divisions, or census tracts, and they Qioas 101] to always follow a census block boundary. Iola B 1017 lot+ loos +Du 5022 5 _ - -- - 1012 tO1J 02 toxo zool B J 41018 5025 5023 2002 1021 0 5027 2o03 yy 1110 2 DDD 2007 ll 024 2020 2001 1023 a 1001 2005 1022 1002 ODP 2.21 201. Fall 104 aDae Census tracts—statistical areas averaging oA� a 2112 2022 2.13 about 4,000 people. Counties and equivalent 5007 %015 2005 u ' areas are subdivided into census tracts. These 2017 2015 areas remain fairly constant from census to +ole 2002 census and thus are useful for longitudinal 2007 2111 2013 2—' 5002D1D 'Oq a 211. 3 studies and a variety of applications. Soo 0, 20D5 200 Ml °'. 7"_ - _- _— -roua - - __ —_- .. Ja D2 Ow ]00] 1002 2001 501) Sole 3011 3110 2011 201. 2008 015 a 005 M1 1009 so+2 a 12 m loos 2003 20 c 31 4D12 ]DOB 3012 4014 3008 0113 21+2 2013 lou 2115 1005 4001 all 100fl 1507 1000 3015 2015 3011 4003 301 2017 'o+' �1 Ills <ooe z1+o 2o1e 2110 1110 +111 D+t 113loo] 5012 4111 -321x0 tool 2021 1017 1 1 31a1 0013 0 s X107 1011 -R1003 1118 1002 1010 1015 toll 3017 ooe +D1z 30as 3o0B 4012 lole 1007 .DOD 1010 1005 1109 1007 ooe 1 1 Iolo Do looe 10173110 fa o 1515 1015 01l 113 2001 1020 alit 3012 10 Block groups—a set of census blocks identified by the same first digit within a census tract. For example, all blocks in a census tract in the 1000 range define block group 1. Once you study the map pieces and definitions shown here, you'll be ready to work with the statistics for these areas. Record Layout for P.L. 94-171 Data Earlier we mentioned that we furnished each governor and the majority and minority leaders of each state legislature with a full set of their state's Census Redistricting Data. The law requires us to do this by April 1, 2001. While P.L. 94-171 requires the Census Bureau to furnish only counts of the total population, additional data also will be in- cluded. Cathy McCully, assistant chief of the Census 2000 Redistrict- ing Data Office, notes, "We'll provide data on the voting -age population and cross tabulations of voting age by race characteristics, as well as by Hispanic or Latino." For Census 2000, the Census Bureau carried out extensive consul- tations between 1997 and 1999, with its Racial and Ethnic Advisory Committee, the 2000 Census Advi- sory Committee to the Secretary of Commerce, state legislatures, offi- cials within the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of justice, privacy advocates, and many other stakeholders in the redistricting process. These consultations fo- cused on how to best tabulate cen- sus questionnaires on which more than one race category was marked. During this period, the Census Bureau conducted the Census 2000 Dress Rehearsal Census in April 1998 in the city of Sacramento, CA; an 11 -county area in central South Carolina, including the city of Co- lumbia; and Menominee County, WI. The new race item, preceded by the question on Hispanic/Latino origin, was used in this Dress Rehearsal. In April 1999, the resulting tabulations showed the percentage of respon- dents choosing more than one race category: Sacramento, CA..... 5.4 percent Columbia, SC......... 0.8 percent Menominee, WI...... 1.2 percent In September 1999, based on these findings and further consulta- tions with stakeholders, the Census Bureau announced that the Census 2000 P.L. 94-171 Redistricting Data would include the full range of racial detail: Each of the "single race" categories (5 plus "some other race"), plus the 57 possible catego- ries for those who choose more than one race. This approach will pro- duce up to 63 racial tallies and provide users the maximum flexibil- ity for analyzing these new data for any area. This flexible design also met the needs of the Department of justice for enforcement of civil rights programs. The Statistical Policy Office of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget issued guidance for aggregating and allo- cating these data for program appli- cations (see OMB Bulletin 00-02, March 9, 2000). These 63 racial categories will be cross -tabulated by Hispanic/Non-Hispanic origin, separately for the total population and the voting -age population. At each step of the process for collecting and tabulating these P.L. 94-171 Redistricting Data, the Cen- sus Bureau will take any necessary steps to protect the confidentiality of individual responses. Hispanic/Latino is not considered a race category. Race and Hispanic/Latino data are obtained from a separate question on the Census 2000 questionnaires. You'll probably make most use of Table 2 in redefining boundaries. Hispanic/Latino origin is not considered a race category. Race and Hispanic/Latino data are ob- tained from a separate question on the Census 2000 questionnaire. The chart on pages 10-11 shows a portion of the computer record layout for how these data will be arrayed on CD-ROM, along with the geography that will link the P.L. Redistricting Data to each block, voting district, census tract, city, county, etc. Census 2000 Public Law 94-171 Data and Correction for Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation The Census Bureau will fulfill Public Law 94-171 and provide each state's governor and legislative leaders with the Census 2000 Redis- tricting Data by April 1, 2001. Bar- ing any unanticipated major prob- lems in conducting the census, these P.L. 94-171 numbers are ex- pected to reflect corrections for possible overcounts and under- counts using measurements from the Accuracy and Coverage Evalua- tion survey. These P.L. 94-171 data would then be designated the most accu- rate the Census Bureau could pro- vide for redistricting. To fulfill the requirements of P.L. 105-119 (en- acted in 1997), the Census Bureau must also make publicly available a second version of these data that does not include the corrections for undercounts and overcounts mea- sured in the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation. Census Geographic Hierarchy (Counts represent the number of 1990 entities) Metropolitan Areas (362) NationAmerican Indian and Alaska Native Areas (576) Urbanized Areas (405) Regions (4) Hawaiian Home Lands ZIP Code Tabulation Areas Divisions (9) Voting Districts States (57) I Places (23,794) (148,874) Legislative Districts Congressional Districts (435)Counties (3,248) County Subdivisions (35,967) Minor Civil Division (30,386) CensUS Tracts Census County Division (5,581) (62,276) Block Groups (229,192) Blocks ---------- --- - (7,017,427) Excerpt from Census 2000 Record Layout P.L. 94-171 Redistricting Data 10 Starting PI -3. RACE [70] Field Name Position Cell Sit. Universe: Total population 18 years and over Total: 1697 9 Population of one race: 1706 9 While alone 1715 9 Black or African American alone 1724 9 American Indian and Alaska Native alone 1733 9 Asian alone 1742 9' Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 1751 9', Some other race alone 1760 9, Population of two or more races: 1769 9,, Population of two races: 1778 9 While; Black or African American 1787 9 While; American Indian and Alaska Native 1796 9 While; Asian 1805 9 White; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 1814 9 While; Some other race 1823 9 Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native 1832 9 Black or African American; Asian 1041 9 Black or African American; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 1850 9 Black or African American; Some other race 1859 9 American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian 1868 9 American Indian and Alaska Native; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 1877 9 American Indian and Alaska Native; Some other race 1886 9 Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 1895 9 Asian; Some other race 1904 9 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some other race 1913 9 Population of three races: 1922 9 White; Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native 1931 9 While; Black or African American; Asian 1940 9 White; Black or African American; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 1949 9 While; Black or African American; Some other race 1958 9 White; American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian 1967 9 White; American Indian and Alaska Native; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 1976 9 White; American Indian and Alaska Native; Some other race 1985 9 ! White; Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 1994 9 While; Asian; Some other race 2003 9 White; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some other race 2012 9 ! Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian 2021 9 Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 2030 9 Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native; Some other race 2039 9 Black or African American; Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 2048 9 Black or African American; Asian; Some other race 2057 9 Black or African American; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some other race 2066 9 American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 2075 9 American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian; Some other race 2084 9 American Indian and Alaska Native; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some other race 2093 9 Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some other race 2102 9 Population of four races: 2111 White; Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian 2120 8 While; Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 2129 9 White; Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native; Some other race 2138 9 White; Black or African American; Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 2147 9 While; Black or African American; Asian; Some other race 2156 9 White; Black or African American; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some other race 2165 9 White; American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 2174 9, White; American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian; Some other face 2183 9 White; American Indian and Alaska Native; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some other race 2192 9 White; Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some other race 2201 9 Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 2210 9 Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian; Some other race 2219 9 10 Excerpt from Census 2000 Record Layout P.L. 94-171 Redistricting Data Census 2000 Record Layout P.L. 94-171 Redistricting Data 63 Race Categories Starting Description Field Name Position Cell Size Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some other race 2228 9 Black or African American; Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some other race 2237 9 American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some other race 2246 9 Population of five races: 2255 9 White; Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 2264 9 While; Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian; Some other race 2273 9 White; Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some other race 2282 9 While; Black or African American; Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some other race 2291 9 White; American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some other race 2300 9 Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some other race 2309 9 Population ofsix races: 2318 9 While; Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander; Some olher race 2327 9 PL4. NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO BY RACE 172] Universe: Total population 18 years and over Total: 2336 9 Hispanic or Latino 2345 9 Not Hispanic or Latino: 2354 9 Population of one race: 2363 9 White alone 2372 9 Black or African American alone 2381 9 American Indian and Alaska Native alone 2390 9 Asian alone 2399 9 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 2408 9 Some other race alone 2417 9 Population of two or more races: 2426 9 Population of two races: 2435 9 White; Black or African American 2444 9 White; American Indian and Alaska Native 2453 9 White; Asian 2462 9 White; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 2471 9 While; Some other race 2480 9 Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native 2489 9 Black or African American; Asian 2498 9 Black or African American; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 2607 9 Black or African American; Some other race 2516 9 American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian 2525 9 American Indian and Alaska Native; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 2534 9 American Indian and Alaska Native; Some other race 2543 9 Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 2552 9 Asian; Some other race 2561 9 Where to Go to Learn More! Responsive government at all levels begins with legislative boundaries that reflect an accurate count of the population. We hope this brochure will help you better understand the maps and data which the Census Bureau provides and how you can use them in redis- tricting. You can learn more about the design and content of other Census Bureau data products from the Census Bureau's web site, the American FactFinder. Just point your browser to www.census.gov. More information about the Census 2000 Redistricting Data Program, can be obtained by calling 301-457-4039 or sending e-mail to catherine.clark.mccully@ccmail. census.gov. You also may write to: Census 2000 Redistricting Data Office, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC 20233. For more information on redistricting data, you may wish to access P.L. web page at www.census.gov/clo/www/ redistricting. html or the NCSL web site http://www.ncsi-org. 11 Census 2000 Redistricting Data Office RDO@census.gov Marshall L. Turner, Chief mturner@census.gov 301-457-4039 Cathy McCully, Assistant Chief catherine.clark.mccully@census.gov 301-457-4039 Reports, tape files, microfiche, CD-ROM, and other products Customer Services 301-457-4100 A W, .CZ b ate• �� bn �,,�n -��,V n -� o b :� �? Com., C�z a �]� no �Oa bhS y y J P N N N N O c� cc J 00 W CT oo O\ G1 00 "" 00 N N uj N N O r.r. uj G, N UN 00 C e•r . C!j 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o O O G W, -- aloA aa4uasgV -- %L'0 ZZO`I uasumool jo XjiD %Z'ZZ %6'I %1'1 S£6`£ dtusumolpla3uIEId %t'££ %Z'Z %L'0 SLL`L PUCIIsaA13o XITD 33oltuJ pnoD awazdnS 33oIPA aluuaS 'S'fl JJOIIu3 juappa-ld a}oA aaluasgV Iujos uoi�atpstznr -- aloA aa4uasgV -- -- shod u► a;oA -- SOIIVH AJO'I"IV3 HAI.LVHVJIkTOD IOOZ `V tiunuur (mic) .LoaaI Cl %6' SZ %Z't %£'Z 6Z6`Z gosuinoo jjo XjTD (LIQ) IDD iiNn %Z'8I %9'E %9'1 £ i 9` i I digsumol pjoUutuid Mia) im IINCl %L'8Z oy %t'£ LSOZ PUUMQA1JO XIII JJOIIBJ JJOIIu3 JJOIiu3 shod uI W31SXS'UPOA jinoD awaidnS ajuuaS 'S'l1 luapisalj 010A IBIOI /uotIaipsilnr -- shod u► a;oA -- SOIIVH AJO'I"IV3 HAI.LVHVJIkTOD IOOZ `V tiunuur I a" cn CD CD CD O a—::i a n � � CL ay �� a a� o� o, zz TD 0 � --' O � � J ice-• OJ Do 00 �] O to O CD b O V O N �-- J �•. ,.._, J O O 00 Vr N CDr-P CD b tN N J N J W W CD iJ O I a" cn CD CD CD O a—::i LU- Lu ul i.�. i'r i i.�.� i ii ��.�... Zvi �.� �..�.�� �.. .�� ... .. �.� -- ...... ......-- 2 Ciry ur Township (Indic:ac Which) Ward Pc[. tvtikc Rogers Dianne Byrum James P. Eyster Patncia Francisco Bornnit: R. Allen R. Gualdoni Bucqueroux Meridian* 17 707 625 9 0 2 13 Meridian 18 217 414 7 1 1 21 MG[ldlan _ _ 19 395 425 3 1 0 10 Meridian* 20 755 634 5 0 1 12 Onondaga 1 540 551 4 1 5 5 Stockbrid c 1 743 _ 684 12 5 6 t2 Veva _ L 487 444 3 5 1 13 Veva____._— 2 _ 1 428 497 407 414 5 7 1 1 4 Whcatfield* 2 1 5 White Oak"_ _ l 283 213 _- 1 6 _ 2 1 3 Williamstown*� _ 1 287 180 0 0 0 Williamstown _ 2 302 _ 305 4 0 0 9 Wdlianastov-m* 3 _ 510 365 0 0 1 3 Williamstown* 4 509 430 3 l 1 4 East Lansing; 1 80 322 7 0 3 22 East Lansing 2 177 554 8 1 1 20 East Lansing 3 117 391 2 1 2 23 East Lansing 4 139 506 8 1 1 17 East Lansing 5 223 508 13 0 2 39 East Lansing 6 355 656 5 1 0 26 East Lansing_ 7 1 367 664 1 5 0 1 20 East Lansing_^ 8 432 708 4 2 0 16 East Lansing 9 160 363 5 0 0 10 Fast Lansing_1 10 17 1 470 3 0 0 38 East Lansing — 11 456 8 0 5 20 East Lansin 12 165 533 1 10 1 2 20 East Lansing 13 151 385 5 0 0 20 East Lansing 14 212 474 13 l 0 42 Fast Lansing_ 15 186 386 3 0 0 16 East Lansing 16 161 318 4 ^ 0 1 18� East Lansing_ _ 17 360 412 1 2 1 16 East Lansing_ 18 _ 337 728 10 2 0 31 East Lansing 19 AV 240 258 2 0 0 5 Fast Lansing 20 AV 708 983 6 1 0 18 ;vast Lansing 21 AV 47 87 2 0 0 3 Lansing Cir _ 1 1 299513 8 7 1 11 _ Lansing C�� Lansing Cir Lansing Ciry 1 2 57 185 2 1 1 _ 3 19 3 3 171 550 10 3 4 1 4 167 266 4 2 0 LansingCiry Lansing City l I - 1 5 6 _ 231 247 7 377. 50-7 509 ' 6 7 2 2 1 1 7 23 Lansing Cicy 7 183 443 17 5 1 15 Lansing City 1 8 175 343 5 0 0 17 _ _ -LE��irig Cit _ 1 9 244 243 0 0 1 4 Lansin g Ci( RE 10 61 182 5_ 0 0 _ 5 Lansing City 1.1 181 _� 163_ 108 185 "L 424 383 _ 339 368 9 10 3 4 _ 2 4 _ 0_ 7 ^^ 3 0 - 2 _ -�-�-- 0 - 9_ 12_ 19 22 Lansing City l _ � 12 _Lansing Ciry 1 _ 13 LsnS[ng Ciry 1 _ 14 FEB -20-2001 15:1e 517 373 0941 9Bx P.04 r co-cr� rel 1J• 11 \UI 1 IL LLL\. Lui l.J U1..II.LI-ice .�,. .� .� t•� �a - r --- i i i -- N City or Township (Indica[c Which) Ward Pct. Mike Dianne Rogers Byrum James P. Eyster Patricia Francisco R. Allen R. Gualdoni Bonnie Bucqueroux Lansing City 1 15 95 152 0 0_ 0 3 Lansing Ci 1 16 126 339 3 1. 2 25 Lansing Ciry 1 17 255 24l I 1 0 l Lansing City 2 l l92 398 4 1 4 11) Lansing Ciry 2 2 41 658 7 2 3 16 Lansing City 2 3 239 492 l l 3 2 11 Lansine Ctrs 2 4 371 1 476 5 1 n 1/1 Lansing City 2 5 227 1(23 424 5 0 2 4 Lansing Ciry 2 6 240 420 9^ 1 0 9 Lansing Ciry__- _ 2 7 ZZ? 228 ' ; 295 5 2 2 17 Lansing Cicy 8 1.99 376 5 0 _ 1 7 Lansing Ci �-_— 9 _ 295 443 l 1 2 4 LansinE CiLy 2 10 249 401 7 3 I 15 Lansing City 2 11 4l 1 597 6 3 _ 3 9 Lansing Ciry 2 121 163 228 1 0 0 5 -LansingCiyy 2 12A 43 1 86 0 0 1 4 Lansing_City 2 13 250 306 5 l 3 3 Lansing Ciry 1 2 14 344 615 7 3 2 8 Lansing City 2 15 195 266 3 0 0 6 Lansing City 3 2 166 499 6 7 1 3 Lansing Ci 3 3 194 C)s 304 2 0 1 2 Lansing Ci 3 4 305 5'5'� 589 6 1 2 5 Lansing Cit _ 3 5 318 26-6 601 9 3 2 10 Lansing City 3 7 _ 197 541 14 2 0 9 Lansing City 3 8 154 767 6 0 1 3 5 Lansing City 3 9 104 597 1 5 3 3 Lansing City 3 10 228.S 437 5 0 4 5 Lansing Ciry 3 11 196 • e1.., 294 1 2 1 4 Lansing City 3 12 179 512 3 0 1 3 Lansin _City _ 3 13 186 ''((( 412 7 _ 2 1 6 L4nsing City 3 14 1 113 390 5 1 -_ 0 3 Lansing City 3 _ 15 163 350 5 1 5 1 Lansing Citv4 _ 1 1 160 315 5 3 2 5 Lansing City 4 2 158 452 9 2 5 20 Lansing City 4 3 156 405 6 3 1 4 Lansing City 4 3A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lansing City 4 4 301 _ 3 1 2 16 Lansin, City 4 5 259 _552 665 10 6 0 _ 17 L. insin • City 4 6 128 _ 4 0 0 Lansing City 4 _ 7 44 _2_33 162 2 0 1 _ _2 y 3 Lansing Cicy 4 8 42 331 1 0 1 3 Lansing Ciry _ 4 _ 9� 6 n ( 160_ ` 513 10 1 1 2 12 Lansing Ci _ 4 _ 10 103 426 8 1 2 15 Lansing City _ 4 11 76 192 4 0 1 19 Lansing 4 12-1 352 543 3 0 4r 7 Lansing Ciry 4 12-A 16 21 0 _ 0 0 0 Lansing Cir_4 _ _ l3 230 315 1 _ 1 1 l_ 14 Lansin Cit 4 -- 41-`-5254 _ 476 3 2 0 4 Lansing Ciry j14 4 15 _ 259 319 1 6 0 0 4— FED-20-2001 15:1e 517 373 0941 9B% P.05 LU LU U1 i✓ 1-i i�✓i� iii uuu�...i 1✓, i✓ uui�u„u .�,.r �.� i� v -.- - 4 City or Township (Ind(care which) Ward Pct. Mike Rogers Dianne Byrum James P. Eystf.T Patricia R. Allen Francisco Bonnic R. Gualdom Bucqueroux Lansin City 4 16 47 459 4 4 0 6 Lansing City 4 17 75 351 7 l 0 12 Lansing Ci 65 AV 235 203 1 0 1 0 Lansing City _ _ 66 AV 179 ,3 364 4 2 1 13 Ldnsing Cites_-- 67 AV 279 317 0 0 ? 3 Lansin City 68 AV _ 212 234 1 1 - 0 a Lansing Ciry 69 AV -Fu 176 221 0 0 0 l Lansing Ci ry 69 AV -G 6 5 0 0 0 0 Lansing City 69AV-H 0 0 0 0 0 0 -Lansing City 69AV-1 30 86 0 0 1 1 Lansing Citi _ 70 AV _ 275 ( 412 5 _ 0 2 4 Lansing CiLy 71 AV 376 400 2 0 3_ I Lansing City 72 AV 159 390 3 1 0 12 Lansing Circ 73 AV 295_1 538 7 0 1 1 3 LesliC CICy 1 _ 293 392 2 0 3 2 Mason City l 490 599 4 0 l 6 Mason City 2 377 4_55 3 1 0 7 Mason City 3 629 639 3 0 2 19 Williamston City* 1 508 388 3 0 _ 1 5 Williamston City* 2 417 328 7 1 1 5 Totals 47,363 67,923 789 207 205 1,605 *Counter petition withdrawn FEB -20-2001 15:1e 517 373 0941 96% P.06 Legislative Redistricting - Computer Software http://www.state.nd.us/lr/99memos/19179.html 19179 Prepared by the North Dakota Legislative Council staff for the Legislative Management Committee November 1999 LEGISLATIVE REDISTRICTING - COMPUTER SOFTWARE During the 1981 and the 1991 legislative redistricting processes, the Legislative Council contracted with a consultant to provide computer-assisted redistricting services. As a result of advances in computer technology, several software vendors are offering affordable redistricting software suitable for use on personal computers. Below are summaries of information distributed by software vendors at recent National Conference of State Legislatures redistricting meetings. Digital Engineering Corporation . Distributes AutoBound, which is based on the Arc View desktop geographic information system (Arc View is used by 85 percent of state and local governments). . AutoBound may be customized to the user's requirements and may be expanded through the use of additional commercial and freeware tools available for use with Arc View. . AutoBound operates on Windows 95 or 98 or Windows NT 4.0 and uses Crystal reports as its built-in report writer. . AutoBound is being used by at least nine states, including South Dakota, Nebraska, and Wisconsin. . Offers onsite and offsite technical support. Sammamish Data Systems, Inc. . Involved in computer-assisted political redistricting since 1970. . Retained by over 250 jurisdictions to prepare plans during the 1990s. • GeoSight redistricting software operates in a Windows environment. . Development of initial statewide data bases and system typically costs $3,000 to $6,000. . Additional licenses for use with the statewide system cost $1,000. . Onsite training is available. Caliper Corporation . Distributes Maptitude for Redistricting. . Designed for Windows 95 or 98 and Windows NT. . Maptittide for Redistricting costs $995. The comprehensive data edition costs $1,495 and the premium phase 2 edition costs $2,295. . Extended technical support services, end-user training, and custom application development are offered. Election Data Services, Inc. . Political consulting firm that specializes in redistricting, election administration, and geographic information services. . Developed Remap 2000 as its desktop redistricting software. . Remap 2000 is an Arc View -based software. . Colorado Legislative Council, Iowa Legislative Service Bureau, and the state of Michigan are included on its client list for redistricting software and data bases for 1999 and 2000. Public Systems Associates, Inc. . Distributes Plan 2000/GeoMedia for redistricting. . Costs range from $4,495 to $59,995. 1 of 2 2/15/01 9:23 AM Legislative Redistricting - Computer Software http://www.state.nd.us/ir/99memos/19179.html . Technical support and onsite user training are available for an additional fee. Corona Solutions . Distributes GeoBalance which uses MapObjects software and creates shape files that may be used for further analysis with Arc View. . Software is useful for additional functions such as providing statistical information for law enforcement uses and economic factors. Legislative Demographic Services . Established in 1982 as a political software and data base development group. . Capability to link any address in the country to the correct corresponding congressional and state legislative districts. 2 of 2 2/15/01 9:23 AM GUIDELINES G= CRITERIA SET FORTH BY THE SUPREME COURT IN THE 1982 REDS RIC ING GUIDELINE 1 Senate and House election district lines shall preserve county lines to the maximum extent possible. Where preserving county lines requires a divergence from the equality of the population between election districts, such divergence from the equality of population between those election districts cannot exceed the range of allowable divergence permitted by the federal Consti- tution, as determined by the United States Supreme Court. GUIDELINE 2 When county lines must be broken to avoid exceeding the maximum range of allowable divergence, the fewest cities or townships necessary to reduce the population divergence which are within the range of allowable divergence shall be shifted. GUIDELINE 3 After the county lines have been drawn consistent with criteria 1 and 2, the election district lines in those counties to which there is apportioned more than one Senator or Representative shall be drawn on city or township lines, with the least cost to the federal principle of equality of population between election districts consistent with maximum preservation of city and township lines and. without exceeding the range of allowable divergence. GUIDELINE 4 Where it is necessary to break city or township lines to avoid exceeding the range of allowable divergence, there shall be Shifted the number of people necessary to achieve. population equality between the two election districts affected by the shift. GUIDELINE 5 Within a city or township to which there is apportioned more than one Senator or Representative, election district lines within those cities or townships shall be drawn to achieve the maximum compactness possible within a population range of 98,- 102% of absolute equality between districts within that city or township. GUIDELINE 6 The Senate consists of 38 districts. GUIDELINE 7 The hcure consists of 110 districts. GUIDELINE 8 All districts shall be contiguous, single member districts GUIDELINE The population of the ideal district, which serves as the median population within the range of allowable divergence between election districts was determined from the 1980 census. GUIDELINE 10 A break of a county line occurs if one part of the county is shifted to one election district and all of the rest of the county is shifted to another election district. GUIDELINE it Where a county line is broken, requiring a shifting of cities or townships in order to reduce the range of allowable diver- gence to that permitted by the federal Constitution, and where two cities or townships whould.bring the election district within the range, the city or township with the least population shall be shifted. However, whole cities or townships must be shifted to the dearee possible in order to avoid breaking city and township lines. GUIDELINE 12 In a county which has more than one Senator or Representative, the boundaries of the election districts shall first be drawn to contain only whole cities and townships to the extent this can be done within the maximum range of allowable divergence and to minimize within that range the number of city and town- ship lines which are broken. GUIDE -INE 13 :f a city or township line is broken, the number of people necessary to achieve population equality between the two election districts effected by the break shall be shifted, except that in lieu of absolute equality the lines may be drawn along the closest street or comparable boundary. If there are competing plans, preference is given to that plan which shifts the necessary number of people but is most compact (compactness formula is dis- cussed in a later guideline). GUIDELINE 14 where competing plans have the same number of county line breaks, the plan shifting the fewest cities and townships statewide shall be selected. If competing plans contain the same number of county line breaks and shift the same number of cities and townships state- wide, the plan that shifts the fewest people in the aggregate state - shall be selected. GUIDEELINE 15 Between competing plans which have the same number of city and townships breaks within a particular county, the plan which mini- mizes -the population divergence in districts across the county is to be selected. GUIDEL INE 1& Compactness„shall:.be -determined by.=circumscribing ea6h:'district4 r _Lhfn`a}dircleofe:minimum- radius :and. =measurtng�.:the�-area not pa.r,V:of-the,-Great Lakes and; not part-of.;another state,,'Ansido tcircle', but no..t;inside the; most compacV.4s-the .plan; _with, the Ieast I area.--:w'thin`--aTl: the,�circIe5 not �wtthin;° the -district circumscribed-,; by' the "di r"dl`l. (CompactL nesT°As! discussed .in the opinion of- the: court,";PQ1126-135 . E S r ARC,NEW�%-�za M Census 2000 Count: Some GIS Ideas As Census Day 2000 (April 1, 2000) looms closer, more effort will be expended by the U.S. Census Bureau to enlist the help of state, local, and Native American governments and other stakeholders in ensuring that the enumeration is as accurate as possible. In the _ precensus/census time frame (now through Summer 2000), the requests for local government assistance are focused on two main arenas: geographic/field operations and recruiting/outreach. Once the census is completed, those same governments will begin receiving the resultant data (beginning Winter 2001). The first of this data will be redistricting population counts. However, before anyone can look at the finished products, the data must be collected. Also, the quality of the data as products will only be as good as the effort that has gone into collecting them. While the bureau will do its best to gather accurate and complete information, it really cannot accomplish the task without the help of local stakeholders. This is why jumping on the Census 2000 bandwagon now is of prime importance. In the areas of recruiting and outreach, there are many activities in which local stakeholders can engage. Because of the spatial nature of a census, GIS is a natural tool to use since in so many ways the census is a marketing, siting, and impact analysis problem. Outreach/Target Marketing Resistance to and disinterest in census participation is increasing. This drives up the amount of nonresponse follow-up the bureau must do. Specific populations in specific housing settings are more likely not to respond than are others. The result is that specific populations have higher undercount rates than others. To reduce these negative effects and improve general response rates, help is being sought in getting out the count. In part, think of the census as a marketing campaign. Below are a number of suggested GIS -related activities that local, state, and other agencies can undertake in concert with the Census Bureau with an eye toward improving the count and bringing the census home. • Identify key areas that represent other hard -to -enumerate population segments (e.g., non-English speakers, recent immigrants and noncitizens, migrant farm workers, low socioeconomic status households [income, education, occupation]). • Build databases and geocode and map local census stakeholders and constituents (e.g., neighborhood groups, places of worship, schools, service groups). • Map nonresponse populations with post -1990 local data (e.g., map out a language service provider's mailing list of non-English speakers). • Create map presentation graphics to support the message (e.g., how a local government uses census data to support local residents). • Create print and graphics file map images for various uses including newspaper stories and PowerPoint -type presentations. • Create Web -based thematic and "census operation" maps. • Create undercount simulations and federal money loss scenarios that governments can use to drive the message home geographically (e.g., "If our count is off by X percent, then our community gets $Y less, and here is where the missed population is probably located."). For more information, contact David Beddoe, ESRI (E-mail: dbed.doe(a esri.com). For more GIS -related activities to help with Census 2000, contact the Census Bureau office serving your area. Coordinate your outreach and recruiting efforts and help make Census 2000 a success. Your community depends on it. Leader in Legislative Redistricting 0b oundY Y OReappartionment ntelfigent Redistrlcti€tg and NEW System http://www.digitalcorp.com/whyone.htm autoBound version 3 Reasons Why autoBound is the Leader in Legislative Redistricting. 4.2 is shipping autoBound is a GIS -based system for redistricting, reapportionment, and resource allo been in continuous use since 1993. Currently in Version 4.2, the product is in use at of other Federal and local agencies throughout United States. The success of autoBo key factors including: Information 1. Product Features. Since the very first version of autoBound, Digital Engineer Product description worked to set the standards by which other redistricting software is developed. All about autoBound Workspace manager, Plan Library, automated redistricting and intelligent error capabilities introduced in previous versions of autoBound, recently implemente Fact Sheet Technical summary New features in autoBound 4.2 include increased performance, the ability to vi boundary outline and solid fill and extensive new editing tools as well as over 5 FAQ enhancements. Frequently asked questions 2. Our Focus in Redistricting software. DEC's primary focus is in developme redistricting. DEC is not engaged in development of generic GIS products nor i autoBound a means by which we can sell other products. We use ArcView fro Services in GIS technology) as the mapping engine for autoBound. A copy of ArcView is purchase of autoBound. Our firm's entire development effort is therefore, than Redistricting and support of autoBound. support services Additionally, DEC does not provide legislative legal services. These services ar Phase II support business partners who specialize in providing Legislative support services. It is development and support of redistricting software is a complex undertaking, re services and resources of our firm and that this development can not be a art time pro P P 3. ESRI Based Solution. autoBound is the an ESRI ArcView Extension. ESRI is Data providing GIS technology. ArcView is the number one desktop GIS product nat with nearly 1 Million users. The popularity of ArcView guaranties autoBound us Where to go? Compatibility with other Government Agencies. Over 85% of stat government agencies using GIS, use ESRI products. Data integri factor when frequent data exchanges are necessary between gov Related Products `'' agencies. Use of ESRI products insures direct compatibility with t majority of government GIS users. A/VReports Pro Extensive supportnetworlc Once the 2000 redistricting effort is s ' states must complete the effort in a relatively short period of tim snowtrack result, availability of support is extremely critical. The use of Arc availability of both local and national support. There are over 850 companies nationally, which are registered as developers and resellers. Additionally, there are literally thousan experienced consultants and programmers available nationally. Any ArcView experienced individual can provide technical support development services for autoBound. 1 --r 1l A M /A 1 A .'1(1 nA X Leader in Legislative Redistricting http://www.digitalcorp.com/whyone.htm • So/id Platform. With nearly One Million users, ArcView is a thorou and robust GIS platform which will be continuously enhanced in t years. . Extensive Third Party Products. As the number one desktop GIS, hundreds of Free and Commercial add-on products available for u ArcView. These include enhancement for map production, datab Import/Export, 3D analysis etc. It should also be noted that every state currently developing a redistricting sol staff is doing so using ESRI's GIS technology. I _F') d/?/nt A -?Q PM ESRI Local Government Start-up Grant Program http://www.digitalcoi-p.com/grant.htm ME MMUT1 NS MMUTAIM ESRI's Local Government Grant Program ESRI formed a $2.4 million grant program for local governments in the United States. to develop an organization -wide geographic information system. The purpose of the grant program was to encourage data sharing among local governm development of geographic databases where none existed. The provisions of the grant framework databases that include parcels, street rights-of-way, and street centerlines. databases become widely available to government agencies in the spirit of nati clearinghouse initiatives. ESRI software provided by the grant included ArcInfo, ArcView GIS, MapObjects Inter applications, and ArcExplorer, as well as ArcView GIS training via ESRI's Virtual Campus. Digital Engineering Corporation contributed to the software packages included in the g A/VNotify, and A/VReports Pro. Click here to download autoBound 3.0, A/VNotify and A/VReports Pro. A passw software tools, and will be provided after contact information has been received. 1 of 1 4/2/01 4•'�0 Pm the Cit\ for police or fire services 1-463 .1L DR IARY: Judicial authority shall Nx organized and exercised pursuant to State la" . Chapter ; PENALTIES i-ioi PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION OF CHARTER: Any person found guilty of an act constituting a violation of this Charter may be punished by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not to exceed 90 days, or both, in the discretion of the court. This section shall not operate to limit or prejudice the power to remove of- ficers or discharge employees as provided in this Charter. ARTICLE 2 OFFICERS AND ELECTIONS Chapter 1. OFFICERS 2-101 ELECTIVE OFFICERS: 1 The elective officers shall be the Mavor, eight members of the City Council and the City Clerk. .2 Each officer shall have a term of four years terminating at 12 Noon on January first and shall serve until the election and qualification of a successor. 3 The terms of office of the Council Mem- bers shall be staggered so that two City Council Members elected from wards shall stand for elections every two vears and two City Council Members elected at large shall stand for election every two years. 2-102 QUALIFICATIONS FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE: Every city official holding elective office shall be a registered elector in the City of Lansing and shall have been a resident of the city for one year prior to taking office. A ward Council Member shall be a resident of the ward from which elected or chosen. 2-103 INELIGIBILITY FOR OFFICE I Any person who has been convicted of either a violation of the election laws of this City, this State or the United Stales of America or a violation of a public trust or any felony shall not be eligible to hold any City office for a period of 20 years from the date of the conviction. .2 No person who is ire default to the City shall be eligible to hold any City office. .3 A person who holds or has held any elective City office shall not be eligible for appointment to a non -elective office or employment for which compensation is paid by or through any agency of the City until the person has been out of office for one year. Page 2 -1114 ( ()111PE\SAT1O\ OF OFFICERS The City shall. n% ordinance. determine the compensation or the procedure for determining the compensation of all officers and employees of the City. The elected officers compensation commission previously created by or- dinance may continue Lo determine the compensation of all elected officials after the effective date of this Charter. The compensation commission ordinance shall be amended to provide a procedure for calling the compensation commission together at a time to be determined by the City Council .3 The City may, by ordinance, at any time alter any procedure for determining compensation of any officers or em- ployees. 2-105 BONDS OF OFFICERS 1 All officers and employees who receive, distribute or are responsible for City funds, shall be bonded in the sum determined by the City Council. .2 The City Council may require bonds from other officers and employees. 3 All bonds shall be approved by the City Attorney and filed with the City Clerk. 2-106 OATH OF OFFICE: Every elective officer and every appointee before entering on official duties shall take and subscribe the following oath: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of this State and that I will faithfully discharge the office of , according to the best of my ability," and shall file that oath, duly certified by the officer before whom it was Laken, in the office of the City Clerk. Chapter 2. ELECTION OF OFFICERS 2-201 TIME OF ELECTIONS: The primary and general elections for all City offices shall be at the time provided by Slate law. 2-202 NON-PARTISAN BALLOT: The Clerk shall prepare ballots which shall conform to the provisions of law. No party vignette or emblem or other designation shall appear on the ballot in regard to City officers. 2-20:1 WARDS: 1 The City of Lansing shall be divided inlu four wards, from each of which a member of the City Council shall be nominated and elected. .2 Each ward shall have the same boun- daries as shall exist on the effective date of this Charter until changed in accord with law. The Election Commission shall reg ise me boundaries of the wards u tthm 60 dad after the figures from the Federal decennial census become available Neu ward boundaries created within 120 days of a city prlman election shall lwcume effective after the general election 4 The Election Commission shall, to the greatest extent possible. establish wards that are compact. contiguous and of equal population 2-2114 METHOD OF NOMINATION: I The method of nomination for all elective offices in the City shall be by petition. A primary election shall be held on those occasions when the number of persons submitting valid nominating petitions exceeds twice the number of positions to be filled in the office. 2 Nominating petitions submitted by candidates for offices to be filled by voters of a ward shall be signed by at least I percent but no more than 2 percent of the persons registered to vote in the ward in which the election is to be held. 3 Nominating petitions submitted by can- didates for offices to'be filled by the voters of the City at large shall be signed by at least 1 percent but no more than 2 percent of the electors of the City registered on the date of the most recent general election. .4 The City Clerk shall assist members of the public by providing information regar- ding the requirements for candidacy, and in the preparation of petitions. 5 No nominating petitions shall be accepted for filing unless accompanied by an af- fidavit sworn to or affirmed by the candidate, staling that the candidate possesses the legal qualifications for the office and requesting that the candidate's name be printed on the ballot. 2-205 ELECTION COMMISSION: I The conduct of City elections shall be the responsibility of the Election Commission consisting of the City Clerk, the City Attorney and the Assessor. The City Clerk shall preside. 2 The Election Commission shall prescribe the procedures to be followed in the conduct of City elections in accord with state law. 2-206 STATE LAW TO APPLY: The general election laws of the state as supplemented by the provisions of this Charter and relevant ordinances shall apply to the qualifications and registration of voters, the filing for office by candidates, and the conduct and canvass of City elections. § 117.27 HOME RULE CITIES 117.27 Repealed. 1966, P. 361, Act 261, Eff. Mar. 10, 1967. i'. Cum�ilrr', nalc Tln• rtgw;drd .when prrtauirrl r..dr4•nnmatnnt ul rrprrsrnt�hrm L. riUr+.n. r.nun+ 6;m1..I .n1>r•n wn. I! 117.27a Apportionment of wards; definitions. Sec. 27a. (1) For the purposes of this section. (a) "Local legislative body" j city. 1682 means the council. common council or commission of a (b) Ward.. means a district comprising less than all of the area of a cit, which constitutes the political unit from which 1 or more members of the local legislative bodv is nominated, elected or nominated and elected. (2) The population of each city subject to the provisions of this section shall, in thefirst instance, be determined from the most recent official united States decennial census. Other governmental census figures of total city population mail be used if taken subsequent to the latest decennial United States census and the last decennial United States census figures are inadequate for the purposes of this section. Each city shall have the power to conduct its own census for this purpose. (3) This section shall be applicable to all cities that do not elect all the members of their local legislative bodv at large. This section shall not repeal any charter provisions meeting the standards established herein but shall be applicable to all charters that fail in whole or in part, to meet the standards herein, or the constitutional requirements of this state or United States constitution. (4) In each such city subject to the provisions of this section the local legislative bodv, not later than* December 1, 1967, shall apportion the wards of the city in accord with this section. In subsequent years, the local legislative body, prior to the nest general municipal election occurring not earlier release of the census figures of each Unitthan 4 months following the date of the official wards of the city in accord with this sectioed States decennial census, shall apportion the n. (5) The local legislative bodv shall file the apportionment plan with the city clerk make copies available at cost to any registered voter of the city. Such plan shall provide for wards which are as nearly of equal population as is practicable and contiguous and compact. Residents of state institutions who cannot by law register in the cit, as electors shall be excluded from population computations where the number of such persons is identifiable in the census figures available. (6) Any registered voter of the city within 30 days after the filing of the apportionment plan for his city, or within 30 days after such apportionment be submitted, may petition the circuit court to determine ifthe plan meetsplanslthel requirements of the laws and constitution of this state and the United States. Histo": _%dd, 1966. p.'_0.5..\ct 11 2. t([. Jill, I 117.27b Board of review; appointment of members, functions. Sec. 27b. When the charter of any city heretofore adopted representatives on the board of supervisors of the county shall bepme members of therovides thtthe city's board of review or act in any other official capacity or perform any other official function, such cit may provide by ordinance for the appointment of the members of the board of review of the city fro'm the citizens of the city and for the filling of such other offices and the performance of such official functions heretofore filled or carried out by such city representatives in such manner as the legislative bodv of such city shall prescribe. ELECTION PRECINCTS 168.654 Election precincts; definition. Sec. 654. The words "election precinct" as used in this act shall mean a political subdivision, the area of which is embraced in its entirety within the confines of a city, ward, township or village, and for which not more than 1 polling place is provided for all qualified and registered electors residing therein. When not divided according to law into 2 or more election precincts, each organized city, ward, township and village shall be an election precinct. History: 1954, Act 116, Eff. June 1, 1955. 168.655 Election precincts; time periods; outer boundaries; division or consolidation. Sec. 655. (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this act, the outer boundaries of election precincts as established pursuant to this act for the 1988 general November election and the primary election next preceding the 1988 general November election shall remain as established at that time through the 1992 general November election, except as permitted in subsections (2) and (3). (2) An election precinct may be divided or 2 or more contiguous election precincts may be consolidated as long as the outer boundaries are not altered during the time period mentioned above. (3) Election precincts shall be divided, consolidated, or established within 30 days after the effective date of congressional, legislative, or county commissioner reapportionment plans. History: 1954, Act 116, Eff. June 1, 1955;—Am. 1987, Act 226, Imd. Eff. Dec. 28, 1987. 168.656 Division of precincts. Sec. 656. (1) A city, ward, township, or village using paper ballots, having less than 400 registered voters, which constitutes a single election precinct, in the discretion of the election commission, or other officials charged with the performance of th-. duty by the charter of the city or village, may be divided into 2 or more election . precincts. In a township, upon a petition signed by not less than 25 qualified electors of the township showing the boundaries of the proposed election precincts, the township board shall submit to the electors of the township, at the next election held in the township, the question of the division of the township into election precincts, as set forth in the petition. If, at the referendum, the electors of the township decide in favor of the division of the township into such election precincts, the township board shall thereupon make the division and enter the same of record in the proceedings of the township board. When in a township, city, ward, or village, or in an election precinct therein, using paper ballots, there is 400 or more registered electors, the election commission of the township or city, or other officials charged with the performance of the duty by the charter of the city or village, shall by resolution divide the precincts into 2 or more precincts, or shall again divide the township, city, ward, or village into election precincts, so that there shall not be more. than 400 registered electors in any 1 precinct. 210 (2) Except as provided in subsection (3), city and township election commissions shall divide precincts according to law, not later than 210 days before the primary next preceding the general November election, and shall immediately notify the county clerk of the number of registered voters in each precinct in such city or township. The county clerk shall notify the secretary of state not later than 200 days before the primary of any precincts in his or her county which have not been divided according to law, and the secretary of state shall proceed to make the divisions as are necessary at the expense of the city or township involved, not later than 180 days before the primary next preceding the general November election. The division of precincts shall be made effective not later than 180 days before the primary election next preceding the general November election. (3) In the second year following each federal census, precincts shall be divided pursuant to this subsection. City and township election commissions shall divide precincts, not later than 120 days before the primary election next preceding the general November election in order that a precinct, as far as is practical, is not split between districts and does not exceed 400 registered voters, and the commissions shall immediately notify the county clerk of the number of registered voters in each precinct in each city or township. The county clerk shall notify the secretary of state not later than 110 days before the primary of any precincts in the county which have not been divided, and the secretary of state shall proceed to make the divisions as are necessary at the expense of the city or township involved, not later than 90 days before the primary election. The division of precincts shall be made effective not later than 90 days before the primary election next preceding the general November election. The secretary of state may authorize, upon written request by a city or township election commission, a later division of a precinct which contains portions of more than 1 elective district. All precinct divisions under this subsection shall be completed not later than 90 days before the primary election next preceding the general November election. History: 1954, Act 116, Eff. June 1, 1955;—Am. 1955, Act 271, Imd. Eff. June 30, 1955;—Am. 1969, Act 290, Imd. Eff. Aug. 11, 1969;—Am. 1975, Act 325, Imd. Eff. Jan 9, 1976;—Am. 1982, Act 2, Imd. Eff. Jan 27, 1982. 168.657 Election precincts; division, rearrangement. Sec. 657. When any city, ward, township or village has been divided into 2 or more election precincts, the election commission, or other officials charged with the performance of such duty by the charter of any city or village, as the case may be, may by resolution divide any precinct thereof into 2 or more precincts, attach a portion of any precinct to an adjoining precinct, or may again rearrange thecity, ward, township or village into election precincts as said election commission or other officials charged with the performance of such duty by the charter of any city or village, may deem necessary and convenient for conducting primaries or elections in said city, ward, township or village, in the same manner and under the same restric- tions as provided in sections 656 and 661 of this act. History: 1954, Act 116, Eff. June 1, 1955;—Am. 1955, Act 271, Imd. Eff. June, 30, 1955. 211 168.658 Election precincts; consolidation. Sec. 658. When a city, ward, township, or village is divided into 2 or more elecrion precincts, pursuant to law, and it appears from an examination of the precinct registration records, that there are not more than 400 registered electors in the city, ward, township, or village using paper ballots, or not more than 2,999 registered electors in the city, ward, township, or village using voting machines, the election commission, or other officials charged with the performance of the duty by the charter of a city or village, by resolution, may abolish the division or divisions and after that time the city, ward, township, or village shall constitute a single election precinct as if a division had not been made. A consolidation shall not be made later than the 120 days before a primary or election. History: 1954, Act 116, Eff. June 1, 1955;—Am. 1955, Act 271, Imd. Eff. June 30, 1955;—Am. 1969, Act 290, Imd. Eff. Aug. 11, 1969;—Am. 1977, Act 236, Imd. Eff. Nov. 30, 1977. 168.660 Subdivision, alteration, or rearrangement of precincts; record; numbers of precincts; description of boundaries; notice; abolition of division into precincts. Sec. 660. When a city, ward, township, or village is subdivided into election precincts, or the election precincts are altered or rearranged, the city, township, or village election commission, or other officials charged with the performance of the duty by the charter of the city or village, shall enter that action of record in its proceedings, specify the numbers of the precincts altered or rearranged in numerical order, and describe the boundaries of each precinct Notice of the subdivision, alteration, or rearrangement shall be given immediately by the city, township, or village clerk. The notification shall be effected by mailing to each qualified and registered elector affected by the subdivision, alteration, or rearrangement a notice by first class letter postage advising the location of his new polling place and, if deemed advisable by the city, township, or village election commission, by posting a public notice of the change in 2 places in each precinct affected thereby, advising the boundaries of each of the precincts. A notice shall also be immediately transmitted to the county clerk, and the county clerk shall transmit to the secretary of state, not later than 200 days prior to the primary next preceding the general November election, the number of election precincts in his county. The city, township, or village clerk shall give like notice of the abolition of the division of a city, ward, township, or village into election precincts, and shall, in the notice of abolition, state that the city, ward, township, or village is restored as a single election precinct and indicate the location of the polling place therein. Notice of the abolition shall be immediately transmitted to the county clerk, and by him to the secretary of state, as in the case of the subdivision or alteration of boundaries as herein provided. History: 1954, Act 116, Eff. June 1, 1955;—Am. 1955, Act 271, Imd. Eff. June 30, 1955;—Am. 1975, Act 325, Imd. Eff. Jan. 9, 1976. 212 213 168.661 Precincts using voting machines; number of machines; division or rearrange- ment of precincts; notices; expenses; use of paper ballots; time limitations on division of precincts; division of precincts following federal census. Sec. 661. (1) When the voter registration in a precinct using voting machines is 1,000 or less, there shall be not less than 1 voting machine for each 500 active registered electors at the general November election and at the primary immediately preceding that election. When the registration in a precinct using voting machines is more than 1,000 and less than 3,000, there shall be at least 1 voting machine for each 600 active registered electors at the general November election and at the primary immediately preceding that election. At other primaries and elections, the number of voting machines shall be at the discretion of the local election commission. In making this determination, the local election commission shall take into consider- ation the number of choices the voter must make, the percentage of registered voters who voted at the last similar election in the jurisdiction, and the intensity of the interest of the electors in the jurisdiction concerning the candidates and proposals to be voted upon. When the registration in a precinct using voting machines exceeds 2,999, the precinct shall be divided or rearranged. (2) Except as provided in subsection (3), city and township election commissions shall divide precincts according to law, not later than 210 days before the primary next preceding the general November election, and shall immediately notify the county clerk of the number of registered voters in each precinct in the city or township. The county clerk shall notify the secretary of state not later than 200 days before the primary of a precinct in the clerk's county which has not been divided according to law, and the secretary of state shall proceed to make divisions as are necessary at the expense of the city or township involved, not later than 180 days before the primary next preceding the general November election. If the election commission of a city, village, or township using voting machines decides to use paper ballots for a primary or election, the preceding limitations shall continue for that election. A division of precincts shall be made effective not later than 180 days before the primary election next preceding the general November election. (3) In the second year following each federal census, precincts shall be divided pursuant to this subsection. City and township election commissions shall divide precincts, not later than 120 days before the primary election next preceding the general November election in order that a precinct, as far- as is practical, is not split between districts and does not exceed 2,999 registered voters, and shall immediately notify the county clerk of the number of registered voters in each precinct in each city or township. The county clerk shall notify the secretary of state not later than 110 days before the primary of any precincts in the county which have not been divided, and the secretary of state shall proceed to make the divisions as are necessary at the expense of the city or township involved, not later than 90 days before the primary election next preceding the general November election. The division of precincts shall be made effective not later than 90 days before the primary election. The secretary of state may authorize, upon written request by a city or township election commission, a later division of a precinct which contains portions of more than 1 elective district. All precinct divisions shall be completed not later than 90 days before the primary election next preceding the general November election. M/Iy & -4� I Tne Loca, Eiec=ion ;,ommission; An overview Michigan Election Law 168.26 Board of township election commissioners; membership, quorum, chairman; absences, appointment of acting memoer. 168.28 Board of election commission and board of canvassers compensation. 168.719 City, township and village election commissioners; duties; party committees, duties, proof copy of ballot, public inspection. 168.656 Division of precincts. 168.657 Election precincts; division, rearrangement. 168.678 Election precincts; consolidation. 168.660 Subdivision, alteration, or rearrangement of precincts; record; number of precincts; description of boundaries; notice; abolition of division into precincts. 168.661 Precincts using voting machines; number of machines; division or rearrangement of precincts; notices; expenses; use of paper' ballots;. time limitations on division -of precincts; division of precincts following federal census. 168.662 Designating place of holding primary or election in city, village, or township; polling place; use of publicly owned or controlled buildings, rental or erection of buildings; facilities; central polling places. 168.663 Polling places; erection of barriers. 168.665 Polling places; forms, stationery and supplies provision, delivery, approval by state bureau of elections. 168.667 Election supplies, furnished at county expense. 168.669 Polling places; ballot boxes, specifications; United States flags. 168.670 Local primaries and elections; ballots, forms, stationery and supplies. 168.674 Petition election inspectors; appointment, chairman, political party membership, vacancies. 168.683 Election inspectors; instruction, compensation, vacancies. 1.68.690 Official ballots; delivery to township, village and city clerks, tkuties of township and municipal election boards. 2/90 -3- 168.979b Unused ballots; opening ballot box; counting write-in votes; excessive votes for an office; voted ballots and voting devices, disposition. 168.798 Electronic systems; automatic tabulating equipment, listing, notice, method. Promulgated Rules - Electronic Voting Systems R.168.772 Rule 2 General Provisions R.168.773 Rule 3 Preparation of Program R.168.775 Rule 5 Preparation of Voting Device R.168.776 Rule 6 Preparation of Official Test Deck R.168.777 Rule 7 Preliminary Accuracy Test R.168.778 Rule 8 Accuracy Test R.168.789 Rule 19 Counting Center Election Inspectors; Appointment autoBound Pact Sheet r 41 t . �kound ' Intelligent Redistricting and NEW Reapportionment System autoBound version 3.2 is shipping http://www.digitalcorp.coin/abfaq.htiii WO ME OWWTIONS autoBound Frequently Asked Questions. Information Q. What is autoBound? A. autoBound is a redistricting and reapportionment system. The primary goal of the Redistricting tedious and time consuming task of creating districts. Solutions Q. How does autoBound work? Product description A. Simply stated, autoBound helps users assign small polygon units together to create All about autoBound city Blocks can be grouped to create a voting district. Once the assignment is comple performed to remove internal polygon lines to create the district boundary. Fact Sheet Technical summary Q. Does autoBound only work automatically? A. No. The automated engine was developed to give users an additional tool during tr FAQ by no means replaces autoBound's extensive manual editing tools. Users can create c Frequently asked use of the automated tool or create partial plans using manual tool and have the auto questions the plan or create a full plan and have the automated model refine the plan. Finally, there are cases where the automated model is not suitable for application. Le reapportionment as an example, involve decisions which can not be easily modeled uE Services and would not be suitable for automation. Redistricting support Q. How can autoBound address the needs of redistricting in different industi A. We realized early on in the development of autoBound that while certain redistrictii services across the board, regardless of the industry, other functions were industry specific. T Phase II support currently four "flavors" of autoBound customized to industry specific needs: services • AUtoBound Legislative Software - specialized for use in Legislative redist reapportionment. Includes ability to create plans using data from multir geography (i.e. Blocks, Block Groups, Tracts and Counties), Tiger import Data Equivalency Files, sophisticated reporting environment. • AutoBound for Police and Fire - specialized for use in creating police and Where to go? Includes tools for import of Computer Aided Dispatch files, identificatio response beat etc. ____.___...__..........._ _....._._.___ • AutoBound for School Attendance Areas - specialized for use in creating boundaries. Includes additional tools for import of data from Mainframe Related Products Database Management Systems. Also includes additional charting and • AutoBound for Territory Alignment - specialized for use in business funct A/VReports Pro territory alignment, customer service districts etc. Includes additional di support for export to Office automation software such as Word, Excel ar SalesTRACK Q. What are the systems requirements for autoBound? A. As with any GIS based system, larger data sets require larger processing capability applications, the following configuration should provide more than satisfactory perforn 1 of 2 2/14/01 10:10 AM Legislative Redistricting and Reapportionment 1 of 2 http://www.digitalcoYp.coi-n/ableg.htm �JJ�Jr1rJ��IJ��JJ��r1'Jr,rJIJ� NEW r11J iJ 1J P_J 1J jJ 9� rj J1111J ala autoBound, the features that autoBound version the standards in Redistrictinc 3.1 is shippingt,. w.� software... Geographic Information Services ORACLE Sales and For over seven years, Digital Engineering Corporation, (DEC) has been providing software tools which set the standards in redistricting software. AutoBound 3.2 is DEC's Support latest release of its comprehensive redistricting solution and is simply the easiest and Systems Integration most efficient tool for creating legislative boundaries. AutoBound is based on the ArcView Services desktop GIS, the most popular GIS product world-wide from ESRI, the leading provider of GIS technology. Web Solutions & AutoBound provides complete redistricting solution from the initial data import using a Internet Support built in Tiger Import tool to the workspace management which enables administration of Custom Application hundreds of plans centrally or through a networked environment. AutoBound's development redistricting tools include multiple assignment methods, dynamic computation of totals using an Excel compatible spreadsheet and an automated redistricting tool. Once a plan is created, autoBound provides intelligent tools for contiguity analysis and various measurements of a plan's compactness. AutoBound also includes a complete Data report writing system as well as a comprehensive map creation and output capability. Where to go? Finally, autoBound can output directly to the Internet by creating HTML and GIF files. Features • Easy to setup, simple to learn and use • Advanced boundary editing tools • Multi-level redistricting • Feature level grouping and locking • Includes intelligent automated redistricting • Unlimited number of undos and set points • Integrated Excel compatible spread sheet tool • Includes free viewing software (GeoTRACK) • Wizard driven user interface simplifies most tasks • Centralized Workspace manager • Complete tools for Phase 2 Electronic submission • Tiger data import tool imports directly from CD • Intelligent contiguity analy • Multiple built in compactne • Import/Export plans to oth • Direct output to the Intern • Built in security features pi • Includes address matching • Advanced mapping tools a • Built in Professional Report • Supports user developed d • Includes over 2 Gigs of Fre 2/13/01 4:10 PM Team Camp Confirmation Subject: Team Camp Confirmation Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:21:00 -0600 From: Cheryl Butler <glv@greatlakescenter.com> Organization: Great Lakes Center To: tyoneon@fwb.gulfnet, tater_33@hotmail.com, shumm@sensible-net.com, byoung@voyager.net, setkill@msn.com, b.chin@district30k-12.i1, dhanson@luxcasco.kl2.wi.us, dccurley@hotmail.com, rtryon@email.adel.kl2.ia.us To: Team Camp Registration Please find below the dates secured for your team camp. To hold that date I need to receive a $250.00 deposit from you. I ask that only one additional check pays the balance due 2 weeks prior to your camp date. Please have your players pay the school and send only one final check to us. We are overbooked on July 9 - 13, so I need to see if anyone listed on that date can go to the following date(s): July 16 - 20 or July 23-27. Please call me if that is possible at 630-231-0444 or email me back a.s.a.p. June 25 - 28 Maple School June 25 - 29 Alma High School Ben Chin Steve Humm Send deposit Send deposit July 9 - 13 Fulton HS Stacy Germane Deposit received - confinned for date Washington HS Amanda Nickkel Send deposit Romeo HS Bruce Udvari Send deposit Thomson Christa Curley Send deposit July 16 - 20 Open July 23 - 27 Choctawhatchee HS Kim Pennignton Deposit receive - confirmed for date Amherst Steel HS Laurie Cogan Send deposit July 30 -Aug 3 Burrell HS Heather McKallip Send deposit Luxemburg -Casco Dawn Hanson Send deposit August 6 - 10 Open August 20 - 23 St. James School TBA Exxes D.H.S. Exxes, Canada Send deposit Deposit received - please confirm date If you have any questions please call me at 630-231-0444. I will be out of the office from April 2 - 9 traveling with my team to the USAV qualifier in California. If you need further assistance during that time please ask for Roger Strausberger. Thank you and have a great day, Cheryl Butler Sports Performance Volleyball Camps 1 of 1 3/29/01 12:47 PM The Complete Redistricting and Precincting Solution for Your City or County Bestselling redistricting software since 1998 Judged easiest to learn and use, fastest, and most comprehensive by the experts Start building plans 30 minutes after opening the box Gives you the edge when you're up against a deadline or stiff competition Optimized for the New P.L. 94-171 Population and Race Data PLAN MANAGER: An easy to use dialog box that manages plans on your computer or across a network. Create any number of plan types (e.g., county commission, city wards, precincts, school districts, and water districts), and save them as Plan Templates. To create a plan, simply choose a template and enter a new name. Organize plans in libraries by plan type, user, security access, etc. Locate, copy, change settings, and password - protect plans. MMTMJD9Works with ArcVlew Shapefiles! For Redistricting Et Em Um Rdewn a— LII- IO e•swe W— tllb o, Devic - D I%Deridm 1%V . R I%ew. EYnl�errrEh/AM! (k Amlr3sJEd/Abid P.mWeN'rc Lbntic I%Ata'JPt lilddd pliprc 1%Hiper�0iyr pad Nw. Ix Nd Hip . A47 .13219 I= 169165 V= 6267) 21.In 11)1 010% 2306] 1B9k]0122 Van 221985 369n J 308006 i,3d0 038% VIM ZIM 831303a 1091 n36t 11118 1530% 11,M) 38591 18911] 61.11% 3 J03)69 2bT Il7. 3366] II.In 1%016 61.511 B3fi amx 1318 1141 10)110 3511% 195959 N.S9Y 290933 11$93 .1.81% m0az 2062% ]5513 MM% 113 026% 6651 229% 202165 e— 30163 3031% 5 4nI2 8381 211% 2153)1 e25it lm 6.39% 99, 0.33% Inn 601% .WN ;Zift 26/M 3].90% s 298)6 12.393I.Nx 231518 )998% 133)0 156t ,201a 23163 800% 11n1 1SLB% 249052 &.9n 3 3]2i'9 30) .1M 73011 71031 1185 381k 10.'5 ON'. 19233 636. )119] 2153% mm )$.11% 3]2115 1.511 .1.15% 11]131 7977% 107 530: 1,50 O.1), 6335 J65% ,)1 N6 %8I% I3 1319%) - — • 51ERRAA E PASADENA MOIJROVIA DUAR)E ` GIENIX A C AZIISA LOS ANGELE NMARIn 13 UTII PASADENA 1 ANG BRIEL N ENT I'MI'Mll /O '--3r:1 ALNAMBRA BAIDWIN PARK O NA h eevERLv w M EL M TE El �ID��x�u��. ONTEREY P K SOUTH EL n EA LOS ANGELES 9 6Bd.N16B1.N1 MO A PD -PopJdian 305.113 3N.12) MO I3b.1ll 0 613 3NIV DIVER ATY ri Da:dim Ulix 123.81% �E vl 'PARK. OS RHILL3E 1vH IOw,Revm3• MM me.rn 5 .23 07]$05 u OOD PI RIVERA Ixw91e 6311% 41 32211 HU ING ON WEST wHIl31ER106 1 B 13.60) 32 Q © FLORENC WHITI 1o�9•ewA 13.681 .13$13 INGLEWOO IzBb i. 149% 1.112 EN O GATED Pm1eKrJE,i,./AIM @wae.AmininvFi,.,Akc 1.]lb t.]86 s.6Y8 .,.]B, IAN ✓ X IANJ� YN MUM Mr. o Amlrvf,v$.R./Abd P.ielv9xfchlcida asst am nen 353], �'1,..,—. ,•I J f f EI SECU AWTHORN lOsu ai>.maaaldsar %Alia Pdf H X527 9L% .2%.N 523! ,..1epd D'neH New ai:ri.I - N W PARAMOUNT lAA ddv UJvp>.k O�yn mm. 153./65 9fua DMH �J GAR NA � BEL ER ICx.q•..k.o 0,101 121,611 H21.T16 ® M 6i CERRI7 S.—.- zxwss.-0 W.K. tB3.2e9 530252 1 —NIH- 1032e9 MI - I, REDDNDG Mwi R—*2-9dV i2T 11 Maptitude® for Redistricting City/County Edition is a special edition of Caliper Corporation's Maptitude GIS for Windows that includes everything you need to build and analyze redistricting plans and design and update precinct boundaries. As you assign area features to a district or precinct, the boundaries are redrawn and selected attributes are automatically summarized to reflect its characteristics. Maptitude is a full -featured Geographic Information System that has set new standards for performance and value. Designed for Windows 95/98/Me and NT/2000, it provides a complete set of desktop mapping and spatial analysis functions. Maptitude is conveniently packaged with nationwide geographic data sets including streets with address information, and states, counties, census tracts, and other census boundaries with over 600 demographic variables. Maptitude for Redistricting includes all of the features and data provided with Maptitude plus a custom menu system and redistricting toolbox that let you: • Create a new plan from a map, a template, or an existing plan. Include multiple levels of geography, designate the control field, ideal value, and summary fields, and set other plan properties including plan type, creation date, and password protection. • Include some or all race categories and adjusted and unadjusted data in the same plan; one button toggle between field sets lets you display only the data you want. • Add areas to a target district using feature selection tools. Select by pointing, by dragging a circle, by defining the corners of a polygon (lassoing), and by attribute values. Select features in any geographic layer, such as census blocks, voting districts, towns, or school districts. As you add areas to a district, both the district boundaries and data table are updated to reflect changes in the current plan. • Display attributes for any layer using labels or color, pattern, dot -density, scaled - symbol or chart themes. Show district boundaries using a border and/or a color theme. Display summary information in a table that contains the district identifier, MAPTITUDE FOR REDISTRICTING KEY FEATURES ■Create districts using any level of geography ■Compute control field totals and deviations ■Select any number of summary data fields, and compute totals and percents ■ Display the plan as district boundaries or a thematic map ■ Display the plan statistics in a scrollable data window ■ Print standard and user -defined reports ■ Export the plan to an equivalency file in dBASE and other industry -standard formats ■ Import plans from other GIS formats ■Merge sub -plans ■ Compute measures of compactness -Verify completeness and district contiguity, and zoom to problem areas ■ Update historic election results to new political boundaries -Save plans in an Internet -compatible format INCLUDES ALL OF THE STANDARD MAPTITUDE FEATURES ■ MapWizarde Automatic Mapping Technology ■Map Librarian and Map Locator ■Map Editing and Customization ■ Open Data Access (ODBC) ■Geographic Data Translators ■ Nationwide Address Matching and Geocoding ■ Feature Selection/ Geographic Queries -Geographic Analysis ■ Page Layouts ■Import all TIGER geographic layers THE MAPTITUDE DATA LIBRARY Maptitude includes an extensive library of U.S. and worldwide geographic files: ■ Streets ■ Cities and Towns ■States and Counties ■ Census Tracts ■3- and 5 -Digit ZIP Codes ■ Highways and Railroads ■MSAs, ADIs, and DMAs • Landmarks ■Water Bodies ■ Detailed Demographic Data control field totals, deviation from the ideal value, and the totals and percentages for summary fields. • Lock districts, and keep communities of interest together. • Compute measures of compactness, and check for completeness and contiguity. Zoom to unassigned polygons or discontiguous portions of a district. Verify the integrity of a plan. • Export a plan to standard equivalency file formats that can be read by other redistricting software and the Department of Justice. Import and merge plans created by Maptitude for Redistricting or other redistricting software. • Capture the current status of a plan as a snapshot. Each plan can have one or more snapshots organized by date and time under the same plan name. Return to any snapshot, and use it as a departure point in the evolution of the plan or as the starting point for a new plan. • Print a completed plan using page layouts that combine maps, data tables, and charts. The standard report library includes population summary, error check, political subdivision splits, incumbents, plan statistics, plan components, plan comparison reports, and more. Create custom reports and add them to the report menu. Customized Redistricting Data CD Maptitude for Redistricting City/County Edition includes a Redistricting Data CD customized for your jurisdiction. The sidebar lists the geographic data included. Easy to Learn and Use Maptitude for Redistricting includes on-line help and detailed manuals packed with step- by-step instructions and tutorials. The Plan PARTIAL CLIENT LIST: Arizona Legislature; Asian Pacific American Legal Center; California Legislature; Colorado Legislature; Delaware Legislature; Department of Justice; Georgia Legislature; Illinois House (R) and Senate (R); Hispanic Leadership Institute; Kansas Legislature; Kentucky Legislature; Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law; Louisiana Legislature; Maryland Legislature and Governor's Office; Massachusetts House (D) and Senate (D); Mexican -American Legal Defense Fund; Minnesota Legislature and Governor's Office; Missouri Legislature; New Jersey Redistricting Commission; New York Legislature and Governor's Office; Oklahoma Senate; Pennsylvania House (D) and Senate (D); Republican Notional Committee; South Carolina Legislature; Tennessee Legislature; West Virginia Legislature; Wyoming Legislature Manager leads you through the process of creating your first plan and speeds the creation of all additional plans. Other wizards help you create maps, display data using meaningful themes, and geocode information based on street address. Caliper also offers hands-on training at your site or at our training facility in Newton, MA. Complete Enterprise Solution The Maptitude for Redistricting Plan Manager makes it easy to manage thousands of plans stored on a computer network. You can quickly find a plan by type, creator, date, key word etc. The Plan Manager provides several levels of security It lets you distribute plans for viewing and perform other plan management functions across the enterprise. Data and plans can be stored on individual machines or on one central server with access controlled by both Maptitude for Redistricting and the network administration software. Publish Your Plans on the Internet Maptitude for Redistricting lets you save your plans (maps, data tables, charts, layouts, and reports) as JPEG and HTML files for static Web publishing. Caliper Corporation's Maptitude for the Web" Software makes it easy to publish your plans as interactive mapping applications on the Web. For example, a user can locate their address on the map, pan and zoom, query the district assignments, and display tables of data from their browser. Works with Other GIS Software Use ArcView Shapefiles, MapInfo TAB files, and Oracle Spatial files without conversion. Export plans (geography and data) to these other formats for use with your existing software. Other Redistricting Services Caliper provides consulting services, training, software customization, web design, telephone support, on-site support, and priority support on a time and materials basis. For more information, contact Howard Simkowitz, Director, Government Services, at (301) 654-4704 or hsimkowitz@caliper.com or visit our web site at www.caliper.com. REDISTRICTING DATA CD ■ Blocks ■ Water Blocks ■ Block Groups ■Voting Districts (VTDs)/Precincts ■Tracts ■ Counties ■ MCDs ■ Places -Indian Reservations ■Urbanized Areas ■ Congressional Districts ■State Senate Districts ■State House Districts ■School Districts ■ZIP Codes ■ Landmark Areas ■Streets with Address Ranges ■AII TIGER/Linerm Segments with Right and Left Census Codes ■ Detailed Demographic Data OMAPfPPUDE Caliper Corporation 1172 Beacon Street, Newton, MA 024619926 Tel: (617) 527-4700 • Fax: (617) 527-5113 http://www.cahpercom • redistrictingQcaliper.com @M1 Caliper Corporation. Caliper, Maptitude, and MapWaard are registered trademarks and Maptitude for the Web is a trademark of Caliper Corporation. All other brand, product, or corporate names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective holders. MAPTffUD9 For Redistricting Dear Redistricter: When the Census Bureau releases the population and race totals for the 2000 census at the end of Mauch, state legislatures, cities, counties, public interest groups, political parties, consultants, and others will begin drawing new congressional and state legislative boundaries, city wards, county commission districts, school districts, water districts, and other redistricting plans. A majority of the state legislatures, both political parties, and many public interest groups will be using Caliper Corporation's Maptitude for Redistricting. We have just released a special version of the software for cities and counties. Maptitude for Redistricting City/County Edition is the complete redistricting and precincting solution for your city or county. Since it works with ArcView Shapefiles, MapInfo Tab files, Oracle Spatial files, and Maptitude files, you can use it in conjunction with your present geographic information system (GIS) or completely stand-alone. The software comes with a redistricting data CD customized for your jurisdiction. On the CD you will find all of the geographic layers used for redistricting along with the PL 94-171 population and race data. Simply install the software and data, and start building plans. The professional documentation will guide you step-by-step from plan setup, through plan builduig, plan analysis, and reporting. The software even includes a variety of standard reports which will save you even more time and effort. Training courses and consultation are also available if needed. The accompanying brochure provides details about the software, data, and services. Please read it over, and then visit our web site, www.caliper.com. You will find additional information in the Maptitude for Redistricting section. Please feel free to contact me (301-654-4704; hsiinkowitz@caliper.com) if you have questions. Sincerely, '4VI4 Howard J. Simkowitz Director, Government Services Caliper Corporation MAPTMJD9.,,._,...,-- For Redistricting,, --a As of February 2001, the following organizations have purchased Maptitude for Redistricting: (partial List) Analytica Research Corp. Alabama State Univ Center for Leadership & Public Policy American Civil Liberties Union Analytica Research Corp. Applied Research Coordinates Arizona House of Representatives Asian Pacific American Legal Center Baltimore, Maryland, City Council Blount County Commission California Legislative Data Center California Senate Office of Research California State Assembly Centre d'Entreprises d'Idelux (Luxembourg) Champaign, Illinois, County Clerk Claremont McKenna College Rose Institute Colorado Department of State Colorado Legislative Council Colorado Reapportionment Commission Colorado Republican Party Congressman Armey Congressman Barton Congressman K. Brady Congressman Combest Congressman Delay Congressman Granger Congressman Johnson Congressman Sessions Congressman L. Smith Congressman Thornberry LUNY, Medgar Evers College Databasics DCI Group Delaware Legislature Department of Justice/Civil Rights Division EPIC/MRA Fields Communications Florida House of Representatives Florida Senate Friends of Dennis Cardoza Frontier International Electoral Consulting Gathings, Kennedy and Associates Georgia General Assembly Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Redistricting Services Gilmore and Monahan Harris County Tax Office Hennepin County, Minnesota Hispanic Leadership Institute Illinois House Republican Caucus Illinois Senate Republican Caucus Kansas Legislative Research Department Kentucky Legislative Research Commission Law Offices of James C. Belt Law Offices of Rolando Rios Law Offices of Samuel L. Walters Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law Legislative Demographic Services Louisiana House of Representatives Louisiana Senate Maryland Department of Legislative Services Maryland Office of Planning Massachusetts Senate Metro Consulting Metro -Rent, Inc. Mexican -American Legal Defense Fund (MALDEF) Minnesota Governor's Office Minnesota Land Management Information Center Minnesota Legislative Coordinating Commission Minnesota Office of Planning Minnesota Republican Party Mississippi State University John Stennis Institute Missouri House of Representatives Missouri Office of Management, Budget, and Planning Missouri Senate National Conference of State Legislatures National Republican Congressional Committee Nevada County California Nevada Legislature Nevada Republican Assembly Caucus Nevada Republican Party New Jersey Office of Legislative Services New Mexico Republican Party New York State Assembly Democratic Majority New York State Assembly Republican Caucus New York State Governor's Office New York State Office of Technology New York State Redistricting Task Force New York State Senate Democratic Caucus Norfolk State University North Carolina General Assembly Oklahoma Senate Pactech Data and Research PDQ GeoDemographics Pennsylvania House Democrats Pennsylvania Senate Democrats Pennsylvania Senate Republicans Polidata Precision Cartographic Queens College Republican National Committee Research Advisory Services Rice University South Carolina House South Carolina Senate Southern Policy Law Center Southern Regional Council Tennessee General Assembly Tennessee Office of Legal Services Texans Against Gerrymandering Texans for Fair Redistricting Texas Legislative Council UCLA Department of Urban Planning Univ. of California at Berkeley Statewide Database Univ, of Georgia Redistricting Services Valley Transportation Authority Virginia Democratic Caucus West Virginia Legislature Whitman Soule William C. Velasquez Institute Wyoming Legislature I Edi Fax: 617-527-5113 Return this completed form to: ® Ma i I: Caliper Corporation, 1172 Beacon Street, Newton MA 02461-9926 Call: 617-527-4700 NOTE: Sales and use tax are the responsibility of the customer and reimbursable to Caliper Corporation together with interest if assessed by the State Department of Tax/Revenue. Orders are subject to acceptance by Caliper Corporation. Prices are subject to change. Please review the License Agreement on the back of this form before ordering the software. BY ORDERING THE SOFTWARE, LICENSEE AGREES TO BE BOUND BY THE TERMS AND CONDMONS OF THE LICENSE AGREEMENT. Caliper and Maptitude are registered trademarks of Caliper Corpondon. Bill to: (if different from Ship to) Ship to: Name. Name. Company: Cmnpaoy: Addne- Address: Ciry: Store: City: state: ZIP: Country: ZIP: Country. Phone.. Ext. Phone: Ext. Fax: ) E -Mail: E -Mail: Method 1 Payment: ❑ Check Enclosed (payable to Caliper Corporation) For Credit Card Orders: ❑ Visa Acct No. Exp. Date ❑ MasterCard ❑ American Express Name on Card ❑ Purchase Order Number: Authorized Signature Please tRegion Total R7 Maptitude for Redistricting—City/County Ed. —2uantity Redistricting plans limited to one county or city County and State: $2,995.00 (Includes Redistricting Data CD, 1 Year of Annual Maintenance, and startup technical support) Authorized Limit: Technical Support Authorization Limit Do not send payment now. You will be billed on a per minute basis. $ r Annual Maintenance After the First Year � Software upgrades and data CDs (e.g. TIGER, �`� $495.00 P. L. 94-171, STF3) Redistricting Data CD for a Different Col $495.00 Geographic Area Your Operating Maptitude for Redistricting includes a USB hardware dev or NT 4.0, you will require a parallel port device instead. Please choose one: ❑ USB hardware aevice for Windows 98/Me/2000 F ❑ Parallel port device for Windows 95/NT 4.0 Subtotal (CA, MD, MA, NY, TX, & VA residents Tax add appropriate sales tax or attach a copy of lax exempt certificate) Shipping and Handling: Per Copy of Maptitude Shipping Ground ...................................... $15 Domestic Two Day ....................... $20 Domestic Overnight .................... $30 TOTAL NOTE: Sales and use tax are the responsibility of the customer and reimbursable to Caliper Corporation together with interest if assessed by the State Department of Tax/Revenue. Orders are subject to acceptance by Caliper Corporation. Prices are subject to change. Please review the License Agreement on the back of this form before ordering the software. BY ORDERING THE SOFTWARE, LICENSEE AGREES TO BE BOUND BY THE TERMS AND CONDMONS OF THE LICENSE AGREEMENT. Caliper and Maptitude are registered trademarks of Caliper Corpondon. Caliper Corporation ("Caliper") provides its proprietary software to its customers according to the terms and conditions herein. PLEASE REVIEW THE FOLLOWING AGREEMENT BEFORE ORDERING THE SOFTWARE. By ordering the software, you ("Licensee") indicate your acceptance of the terms of this License Agreement. Licensee and Caliper agree as follows: 1. Definitions. As used in this Agreement: A. "Software" means the Maptitude software as provided to Licensee, and includes any upgrades and additional modules furnished by Caliper. B. "Data" means any data, maps, images, video, audio, animations, or graphics furnished by Caliper for use with the Software, and includes any updates to such data. C. "Documentation" means the materials produced by Caliper to describe the operation of the Software. D."Product" means the Software, Data, and Documentation. E. "Single user workstation" means any device from which the Software or Data may be used or accessed. In the case in which networks of computers or intelligent and nonintelligent terminals are used, each such computer or terminal is considered to be a separate single user workstation. 2. Grant of License. A. On the terms and subject to the conditions of this Agreement, Caliper hereby grants to Licensee the non-exclusive, non -assignable right to have the product utilized by one single user on a single -user workstation at any one time. Caliper shall continue to own, and Licensee acknowledges that Caliper is the sole owner of, the Product (including the media on which the Product is supplied). Caliper grants to Licensee a non-exclusive royalty free right to reproduce and distribute Licensee's own software applications for use with MAPTITUDE that are created using the GISDK software and the Caliper Script Language and sample code described therein provided that Licensee (a) currently has a valid license for Caliper's MAPTITUDE software and has complied fullywith its terms, (b) distributes its application only to those who are licensed to use MAPTITUDE, (c) does not use the Caliper name, logo, or trademark to market its software applications, (d) includes a copyright notice for Caliper, (specifically: Portions copyright 1995, Caliper Corporation) on its disk labels and on the title page of its software documentation, and (e) agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend Caliper from and against any claims or lawsuits, including attorney's fees, that arise or result from the use or distribution of Licensee's software application. B. Licensee shall not: use or permit the use of (including by timesharing or networkuse) the Product by or for the benefit of any entity other than Licensee;, use the Product in a computer service business; make copies of the Documentation; license, sublicense, lease, resell, or grant rights in the Product to others; make verbal or media translations of the Documentation; make telecommunications data transmissions of the Product; use long-haul gateways on any central processing unit on which the Product is used; use Caliper's confidential information and trade secrets contained in the Software to aid in the development of software or products that are competitive with the Product; distribute, rent, or otherwise provide access to the Product to others on either a permanent or temporary basis; use the Product to create data in Caliper's CDF data format for sale or any other commercial purpose without the prior written permission of Caliper. C. Licensee shall use the Software only in executable code form. Licensee agrees not to attempt to create or permit others to attempt to create, by reverse compiling or unassembling or otherwise, any part of the source programs or object code or file formats from the executable code version of the Software or from data or other information provided by Caliper. 3a. Proprietary Rights. Licensee acknowledges and agrees that the Product contains trade secrets proprietary to Caliper. Neither Licensee nor any entity now or subsequently affiliated with Licensee will, without obtaining prior written consent of Caliper, disseminate the Product, or any copies thereof or any part thereof, to any person or other entity except employees ofLicensee and enrolled students ofacademic organizations to the extent necessary to utilize the Product in conformity with the terms of this Agreement. Licensee agrees to notify Caliper promptly upon learning of any unauthorized dissemination or use of the Product. Licensee agrees that the injury that would result to Caliper from violation of this Agreement would be irreparable. 3b. Proprietary Data. Licensee agrees that the Data shall be treated as part of, and used only' in conjunction with, the Software. In addition, the Data may be subject to other agreements between Licensee and Caliper or third parties restricting the use of the Data. Certain of the Data is supplied to Caliper by Geographic Data Technology, Inc. (GDT). Licensee acknowledges the valuable proprietary rights of GDT in the GDT Data. All copies of the GDT Data and all copies of any media containing the GDT Data or parts thereof shall have this notice set forth prominently: "01990-xx Geographic Data Technology, Inc. This product contains proprietary and confidential property of Geographic Data Technology, Inc. Unauthorized use, including copying, ofthis product is expressly prohibited." 4. Copy Restrictions. The Product is copyrighted. Unauthorized copying of the Product, including Software that has been modified, merged, or included with other software, is expressly forbidden. Licensee may be held legally responsible for any copyright infringement. Subject to these restrictions, Licensee may install one (1) copy of the Software and the Data on a hard disk for each copy licensed, and may make one (1) copy of the Software and the Data for each copy licensed, solely for backup purposes. Licensee must reproduce and include the copyright notice on the backup copy. 5. Warranties. Licensee acknowledges that there are errors and gaps in the Data and that Caliper does not warrant that the Product will meet Licensee's needs or are suitable or sufficiently accurate to be fit for any particular purpose or use. Licensee acknowledges that (a) the operation of the Software may not be uninterrupted or error -free; and (b) the functions of the Product may not meet Licensee's requirements. Caliper warrants that the Software will function for a period of 60 days from date of delivery substantially in accordance with the Documentation. CALIPER DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL OTHER WARRANTIES AS TO THE PRODUCT, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE. 6. Limitation of Liability. The liability of Caliper to Licensee, regardless of the form of action or theory of liability, whether under contract or tort (including negligence), and whether under this Agreement or any other agreement, shall not exceed the sum of all amounts paid by Licensee to Caliper pursuant to this Agreement. 7. Exclusion of Liability. IN NO EVENT SHALL CALIPER BE LIABLE TO LICENSEE.FOR CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES OF ANY NATURE. Specifically, and not in limitation, Caliper shall not be liable for any costs incurred by Licensee due to (a) loss of profits or revenues, (b) loss of use of the Product, (c) loss of data, (d) costs of substitute software, and (e) claims by parties other than the Licensee for similar costs. Caliper shall have no liability for any claim of copyright or patent infringement based upon the use of other than a current, unal tered release of the Product or based upon any modification or combination or use of the Product with databases and other programs. No action or claim, regardless of form arising out of this Agreement, shall be brought by Licensee more than one year after the cause of action has occurred. 8. Exclusive Remedies. Licensee's exclusive remedies for any claims against Caliper arising out of this Agreement shall be limited to the following, at the option of Caliper: (a) replacement by Caliper of the Software with software which functions substantially in accordance with the Documentation; (b) repair by Caliper of the Software, by patch or workaround, so that it functions substantially in accordance with the Documentation; or (c) refund by Caliper of the funds paid by Licensee and received by Caliper in respect of the Product. 9. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, United States of America (without regard for any conflict of law rules that would provide that the law of another jurisdiction would govern), and applicable copyright laws. 10. No Waiver. The failure of Caliper to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement shall not be construed to be a waiver of Caliper's right thereafter to enforce such provisions. Moreover, the expiration or termination of this Agreement shall not affect provisions of this Agreement which by their terms and meaning are of a continuing nature, including the provisions of Sections 2(B), 2(C), 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8. 11. Export. Licensee acknowledges that the Product constitutes technical data under the Export Control Regulations of U.S. Department of Commerce and agrees not to export the Software in violation of such Regulations. 12. Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth the entire understanding and agreement between Caliper and Licensee as to the subject matter hereof and supersedes the provisions ofany prior understandings, representations, sales materials, agreements, and writings, includingany purchase orders submitted by Licensee to Caliper in respect of the Product. This Agreement may be modified only by a written agreement which is made subsequent to this Agreement and signed by duly authorized representatives of Caliper and Licensee. If any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be held by a court or competent jurisdiction to be contrary to law, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 13. Term. This Agreement shall continue in effect for a period of ninety-nine years from delivery. Licensee shall return the Product to Caliper and destroy any other copies of the Product in its possession upon the expiration of such term. 14. Termination. In the event that Licensee fails to comply with any of the provisions of this Agreement, this Agreement will automatically terminate without notice. Upon such termination, Licensee shall have no further right to possess or use the Product and Licensee shall promptly return to Caliper the Product and destroy any other copies of the Product in its possession. U.S. GOVERNMENT RESTRICTED RIGHTS The Product is provided with RESTRICTED RIGHTS. Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause 52.227-19, COMMERCIAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE — RESTRICTED RIGHTS (JUN 1987) 0201 Maptitude for Redistricting - City/County Edition http://www.caliper.conVRedistricting/citycounty_edition.htn-1 1122 BEACON STREET , NFYr.-ON! ,`vim., W�, 0246-1 TEL 612-577 11710') Flk.* Overview Maptitude® for Redistricting City/County Edition is a special edition of Maptitude Caliper Corporation's Maptitude GIS for Windows that includes everything you Create dis need to build and analyze redistricting plans and design and update precinct any le Maptitude for the Web boundaries. As you assign area features to a district or precinct, the geog Maptitude for boundaries are redrawn and selected attributes are automatically summarized Compute c Redistricting to reflect the district's characteristics. totals and ►Overview TrainingSelect any etas etter H„. ... 9't,lA �,. � --t summary Tech01ner H and comp 3 Other ervices and and pe ro acts Display t TransCAD _...�� ... :...... district bo GIS+ „ ' J L �,r a them 405 A#IGFLE 14 '”. '-�"• X' GISDK Display fA - �•� � >IHaNBRn UAW&M m i rxx ` StatlStl scrollaS w i n El 4:06 -4r Print stan g user-defin t r a Export the ,/ �, iill ELf def f6ta��g,. to 'I,HIT" equivale dBASE a X41 �.zr� i industry - r[ 5NTWA"� H for ME i Import p other GI Plan Manager: An easy to use Maptitude is a full -featured Geographic Information System that has set new Merge s dialog box that manages plans standards for performance and value. Compute on your computer or across a Designed for Windows 95/98/Me and of comp network. Create any number of NT/2000, it provides a complete set of Verify cc plan types (county commission, desktop mapping and spatial analysis and d cit ds, precincts, school y warp functions. Maptitude is conveniently packaged with nationwide geographic data contiguity, districts) and save them as Plan sets including streets with address to probe Templates. To create a plan, information, and states, counties, census update simply choose a template and tracts, and other census boundaries with election enter a new name. Organize over 600 demographic variables. new p plans in libraries by plan type,boun Maptitude for Redistricting City/County user, security access, etc. Edition includes all of the features and data Save pla Locate, copy, change settings, provided with Maptitude plus a custom Internet -c and password -protect plans. menu system and redistricting toolbox that for let you: 1 of 4 3/26/01 2:23 PM Maptitude for Redistricting - City/County Edition 2 of 4 http://www.caliper.conVRedistricting/citycounty_edition.htm • Create a new plan from a map, a template, or an existing plan. Include multiple levels of geography, designate the control field, ideal value, and Redist summary fields, and set other plan properties including plan type, Data creation date, and password protection. . Include some or all race categories and adjusted and unadjusted data in Blo the same plan; one button toggle between field sets lets you display only the data you want. water • Add areas to a target district using feature selection tools. Select by pointing, by dragging a circle, by defining the corners of a polygon Block (lassoing), and by attribute values. Select features in any geographic layer, such as census blocks, voting districts, towns, or school districts. voting As you add areas to a district, both the district boundaries and data (VT table are updated to reflect changes in the current plan. . Display attributes for any layer using labels or color, pattern, Tra dot -density, scaled -symbol or chart themes. Since the district Cou boundaries are instantly updated, you do not have to use a color theme to show district boundaries. Display summary information in a table that Mc contains the district identifier, control field totals, deviation from the ideal value, and the totals and percentages for summary fields. Pla Lock districts, and keep communities of interest together. Compute measures of compactness, and check for completeness and Indian Re contiguity. Zoom to unassigned polygons or discontiguous portions of a urbaniz district. Verify the integrity of a plan. Export a plan to standard equivalency file formats that can be read by Congre other redistricting software and the Department of Justice. Import and Dist merge plans created by Maptitude for Redistricting or other redistricting State software. Dist Capture the current status of a plan as a snapshot. Each plan can have one or more snapshots organized by date and time under the same State Hou plan name. Return to any snapshot, and use it as a departure point in the evolution of the plan or as the starting point for a new plan. School Print a completed plan using page layouts that combine maps, data Landma tables, and charts. The standard report library includes population summary, error check, political subdivision splits, incumbents, plan Streets wi statistics, plan components, plan comparison reports, and more. Create Ran custom reports and add them to the report menu. All TIGE Customized Redistricting Data CD Segments Maptitude for Redistricting City/County Edition includes a Redistricting Data and Left CD customized for your jurisdiction. The sidebar lists the geographic data Co included. Easy to Learn and Use Maptitude for Redistricting City/County Edition includes on-line help and Det Demogra 3/26/01 2:23 PM Maptitu& for Redistricting - City/County Edition http://www.caliper.com/Redistricting/citycounty_edition.htm detailed manuals packed with step-by-step instructions and tutorials. The Plan Manager leads you through the process of creating your first plan and speeds the creation of all additional plans. Other wizards help you create maps, Includ display data using meaningful themes, and geocode information based on the St street address. Caliper Corporation offers hands-on training at your site or at Mapt our training facility in Newton, MA. Feat Complete Enterprise Solution The Maptitude for Redistricting Plan Manager makes it easy to manage A Mati utomati thousands of plans stored on a computer network. You can quickly find a plan Techn by type, creator, date, key word etc. The Plan Manager provides several levels of security and lets you distribute plans for viewing, and perform other plan Map Libr management functions across the enterprise. Data and plans can be stored on Map L individual machines or on one central server with access controlled by both Maptitude for Redistricting and the network administration software. Map Edi Custo Publish Your Plans on the Internet Maptitude for Redistricting lets you save your plans (maps, data tables, charts, open Da layouts, and reports) as JPEG and HTML files for static Web publishing. (OD Caliper Corporation's Maptitude for the WebTM Software makes it easy to publish your plans as interactive mapping applications on the Web. For Geograp example, a user can locate their address on the map, pan and zoom, query the Trans district assignments, and display tables of data from their browser. Nationwid Works with Other GIS Software Matchi Geoc Map ArcView Shape, Mapinfo Tab, and Oracle Spatial files without conversion. Export plans (geography and data) to these other formats for use with your Feature existing software. Geograph Other Redistricting Services Geographi Caliper provides consulting services, training, software customization, web design, telephone support, on-site support, and priority support on a time and Page L materials basis. For more information, contact Howard Simkowitz, Director, Import Government Services, at (301) 654-4704 or hsimkowitzQcaliper.com. Jay Pricing and Ordering _ Maptitude for Redistricting City/County Edition, including a redistricting data CD and one year of annual maintenance (software upgrades and data updates), costs $2,995. Call Caliper at 617-527-4700 to place your order, or Sys download a PDF version of the Maptitude for Redistrictinq order form and fax it Requir to 617-527-5113. 1 0711 - F*WT 7 0 Works with ArcView 5hap;efiles Zero Risk with Fm—ve-Itude for Redistricting ( Message for ArcView Users Windows or NT 64MB RA for NT Pentium bet Disk spac state (20 See Also: Maptitude for Redistricting Newsletter Caliper Delivers State -of -the -Art Redistricting Software to Maryland (Press Release Caliper Supplies Colorado with Interactive Redistrictinq Web Site (Press Release) 3 of 4 3/26/012:23 PM G�S!� � C�CO3C�itsCPCu'JCnJ� � X100 L the features that set the standards in Redistricting software For over six years, Digital Engineering Corporation, (DEC) has been providing software tools which set the standards in redistricting software. AutoBound 3.1 is DEC's latest release of its comprehensive redistricting solution and is simply the easiest and most efficient tool for creating legislative boundaries. AutoBound is based on the ArcView desktop GIS, the most popular GIS product world-wide from ESRI, the leading provider of GIS technology. AutoBound provides complete redistricting solution from the initial data import using a built in Tiger Import tool to the workspace management which enables administration of hundreds of plans centrally or through a networked environment. AutoBound's redistricting tools include multiple assignment methods, dynamic computation of totals using an Excel compatible spreadsheet and an automated redistricting tool. Once a plan is created, autoBound provides intelligent tools for contiguity analysis and various measurements of a plan's compactness. AutoBound also includes a complete report writing system as well as a comprehensive map i . • i • i . MW creation and output capability. enables administration of hundreds of plans Finally, autoBound can output directly to the Internet by centrally or through a network of computers. creating HTML and GIF files. The system provides ease of access for end users while controlling access through a secure Rrofessional tools- in an open developmentenvironment autoBound is based on ArcView GIS, the industry's leading desktop mapping solution. The following provide a brief outline of the key features of this environment: > Highly Customizable. Every aspect of autoBound can be customized to the user's requirements. From icons to menu items, users can add, remove and rename tools as necessary. > Easily Extendable. Users can take advantage of hundreds of existing commercial and freeware tools available for use with ArcView and autoBound. Additionally, users can develop custom applications using autoBound APIs and ArcView's Avenue programming language. > Open Data Standards. autoBound uses dbase format population files and Shape format geographic files. Both are open industry standards and supported by other database and GIS products. > Support for External data sources. autoBound includes tools for importing of Census Bureau's PL and Tiger Files. Additionally users can directly access data located in Excel Spread Sheets, Access Databases, Text Files, Oracle Tables, Sybase databases, Informix Servers as well as dozens of other data formats. Enterprise Solution AutoBound is designed for easy integration into the total ESRI GIS environment. In addition to compatibility with over 80% of State and Local agencies nationally, this environment provides autoBound users with access to sophisticated data development tools such as Arc/Info, high performance enterprise database access through SDE (Spatial Data Engine) and professional map production software such as Maplex. All of which work directly with autoBound without the need for file translation or data export. Finally, there are over 850 ESRI based consulting and software development firms nationally which can provide immediate local support for autoBound users. The combination of comprehensive software solutions and widely available support, provides autoBound users with an unparalleled solution for redistricting and reapportionment. 'Af9) 0 flM� �n i> 4J 5denm. 1A �r SlNmiv ASf �..J J y(b-.1:'1kAW ;bet Scab I m nPUA01uµ (4r ynxv.Mt+a'Qi��ICM�'8YY _.reuvwm 1I5 Jf]RJ)1 Jf .YU fm' 59% — h .1% Sfp1 JRK JS>RJJI JK >3J6�) -19% 11— .l% WN ]K1I JSJIIAJ] %% ](JHa -19% n3n iH. Kfl1 %%151RAJ] RIY ]IAI4W fibfi] A% fIY iTN9 JMf 1511JJ11 Il%. IJ9J69504Cd JS% 9lll -6]% fNJO 6 IWIJSIRJII 0. 951538 N'd 0% IOR95. il. NN3 Redistricting Features r� T ol1T1M7i 7R;_il !A+' 1L7 � L: aotocmu F LpJ,e 013rimW- _�Ullsglgly _ Sun. and Thmrdl... y Easy to setup, simple to learn and use Advanced boundary editing tools Y Multi-level redistricting Feature level grouping and locking v Includes intelligent automated redistricting Unlimited number of undos and set points Integrated Excel compatible spread sheet tool ➢ Includes free viewing software (GeoTRACK) Wizard driven user interface simplifies most tasks Centralized Workspace manager Y Complete tools for Phase 2 Electronic submission Tiger data import tool imports directly from CD Intelligent contiguity analyzer Multiple built in compactness measurements Import/Export plans to other GIS Direct output to the Internet Built in security features prevents unauthorized edits Includes address matching/geocoding r Advanced mapping tools and hard copy production tools Built in Professional Report writer Supports user developed datasets Includes over 2 Gigs of Free data Onsite Support - Digital Engineering Corporation provides extensive onsite and offsite technical support for all phases of redistricting. From database development to complete phase 2 support services, DEC provides technical services designed to meet the short term needs and long term goals of clients. Custom Application Development - Programming support is available through our Development Services Group. The Development Services Group specialize in development of custom GIS and legislative applications using development tools such as Visual C++, Visual Basic, Avenue, AML as well as many other. Database conversion Services - DEC can assist clients with the need for conversion of existing hardcopy and/or digital files for use in autoBound and ArcView GIS. Network Design and Systems Support - DEC's systems group specializes in implementation and support of Local and Wide Area networks and implementation high performance systems. DEC also has programs in place for providing turn -key systems which include high performance workstations, all required software and Census Bureau databases needed to quickly start any redistricting project. Founded in 1986 as a computer services consulting firm, Digital Engineering Corporation (DEC) provides single source solutions for clients with specialized requirements for high performance digital mapping systems. DEC's clients share one requirement, the need for implementing state of the art technologies in a stable commercial environment. In this setting, DEC has succeeded by remaining focused on the needs of the clients and providing technologies which integrate with existing systems and provide a solid platform for future growth. autoBound System Requirements Microsoft Windows 95/98 or NT 4.0 Operating System ESRI's ArcView GIS Version 3.2 (Included) 266 Mhz. Pentium processor, 64 Mb. Ram 2 GB. Hard Drive (Only 100 Mb. used for software) 4 Mb. Video Card with I T° Monitor R� D 1 G ITA IL ENGINEERING CORPORATION Red istri cting Solutions 5525 Twin Knolls Road, Suite 321 00 Columbia, Maryland 21045 ORACLE (4 10) 715-2300 FAX (4 10) 71 5-5507 Business web: http://www.digitalcorp.com AUTHORIZED Alliance DEVELOPER Programme email: info@digitalcorp.com