Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994 Historic District Commission MinutesDraft to Clerk 08/25/95 Adopted 09/14/95 E ' To Clerk 09/20/95 SE' � ( � i,� �. LANSING HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION tt 1 MINUTES `ri{6�Jli-�U CITY CLERK( Planning Division Planning & Neighborhood Development Department Conference Room 119 N. Washington Square Annex; 2nd Floor Lansing, Michigan 48933 March 3, 1994; 5:30 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 5 : 40 p.m. by Chair Suzanne Sawyer - Burleson. II. ROLL CALL Members Present: Mark Bailen Fred Blanck Suzanne L. Sawyer -Burleson Robert Busby Tony Garcynski Wilbur Sherman Stephanie Whitbeck Members Absent: None Staff Members Present: Donna Wynant Guests: Diana Reedy III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA It was moved by Bailen, seconded by Whitbeck, to approve the agenda as amended. On a roll call vote, the motion carried unanimously (7-0) . IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Advertised Public Hearings: None B . Members of the Audience Wishing to Address the Commission: None IV. BUSINESS SESSION A. Approval of Minutes No minutes were presented for approval B . Old Business LANSING HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION, March 3, 1994 Page 2 1. Review HDC Work Program A discussion ensued regarding the work program for 1994. No action was taken. 2. Rules of Procedure The rules of procedure were discussed, but no action was taken. 3. Historic District Ordinance: A discussion of the proposed ordinance ensued. It was moved by Garzcynski, seconded by Busby, to have the goal of reviewing a completed draft of the proposed ordinance at the April 7, 1994 meeting. On a roll call vote, the motion carried unanimously (7-0) . C . New Business 1. Michigan Society of Planning Officials Conference: "Improving Community Appearance", May 4, 1994 Wynant discussed the upcoming conference, and asked if a member of the Historic District Commission would be interested in attending. Any attendee would be reporting back to the Commission. No action was taken. 2. Status of Historic Preservation Program funds The Commission discussed possible eligible uses for historic preservation program funds, and requested a clarification of staff. Whitbeck asked about what HPP funds have been spent and also if money was available for signs in the Cherry Hill Historic District. D . Committee Reports: None E. Other Communications It was moved by Whitbeck, seconded by Garcynski, to send a letter to the mayor regarding the interest of the HDC in area plans and development activities. Staff would be drafting a letter for HDC approval. On a roll call vote, the motion carried unanimously (7-0). VI. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Bailen, seconded by Garcynski, to adjourn the meeting. On a voice vote, the motion carried unanimously (5-0). The meeting was adjourned at 7:40 p.m. 00-09-94PC12:26 RCVD Approved 09/08/94 To Clerk 09/09/94 LANSING HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION April 28, 1994; 5 : 30 p.m. SPECIAL MEETING Planning Division Planning & Municipal Development Department Conference Room 119 North Washington Square Annex; 2nd Floor Lansing, Michigan 48933 I. CALL TO ORDER The Meeting was called to order at 5 : 30 p.m. by Chair S . Sawyer -Burleson. Roll call was taken. II. ROLL CALL A. Members in attendance: Fred J. Blanck Robert Busby Suzanne Sawyer -Burleson Anthony J. Garzynski Wilbur Sherman Stephanie L . Whitbeck B . Excused Absences: Mark Bailen C . A quorum of six members was present, allowing voting action to be taken at the meeting. D . City Staff: Donna Wynant, Senior Planner E . Guests: Robert Kocsis Andrew Abood Robert Morris Diana Reedy Clint Van Nocker Jesse Lothamer III. Public Hearing 213 E. Hillsdale: Request to Demolish D . Wynant presented the history of this case, and outlined the staff report, as well as the ordinance. Staff did not feel that demolition was warranted in this case. The chairperson explained the function and responsibility of the Commission in cases such as this. LANSING HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION April 28, 1994 Andrew Abood, property owner of 213 E. Hillsdale, spoke. He detailed his reasons for desiring to demolish the building, which is currently being used as rental property. Mr. Abood indicated his interest in selling this property to Jesse Lothamer to allow him to increase the number of parking spaces for his office at 533 S. Grand/ Chavez Ave. Clint Van Nocker, representing V.I.P. Real Estate, managers of 213 E. Hillsdale, spoke concerning the current use of the property. He spoke of the work which had already been done on this property to convert it from a multi - to a single family rental property. He mentioned his belief that the highest and best development of this property was a parking lot. Robert Kocsis, listing agent representing Andrew Abood, spoke of the lack of parking space, and the lack of value of the property, if used as owner - occupied residential property, as office space, or as rental property. He stated that this property serves no increased value to the historic district. He feels that the best use for the property would be to demolish the building. Robert Morris, 311 Seymour St., spoke. He stated that he has done design work for Jesse Lothamer, for his property at 533 S. Grand/Chavez Ave., and the proposed site change was drawn by him. He stated however, that he has no further interest in the property. However, that as far as is possible, the work done by himself and Mr. Lothamer on the 533 S. Grand property in the way of decoration and design, is consistent with the standards of period and type for the neighborhood. Jesse Lothamer, 533 S. Grand/ Chavez Ave., asked to modify his request for front yard parking, and felt that the Historic District Commission had authority to grant a variance. He continued, speaking about his plan for his building at 533 S. Grand/Chavez Ave., his needs for parking, and his desire to purchase the property now occupied by 213 E. Hillsdale for parking. Jesse Lothamer mentioned an alternative by creating parking elsewhere on his property of of Grand Avenue, which would require a variance. He suggested the possibility that he did not need parking at the location of Mr. Abood's property - that would need to be demolished. Mr. Abood indicated that he converted the structure from a two unit to a one unit during his ownership. Diane Reedy made some comments on what it was like living in the 533 S. Grand Property. The Board asked Mr. Abood several questions about the property. He has owned the property for approximately 3 years, it has been rental for the entire time, and the property was purchased to use as a rental. It has not been lucrative as rental property. Mr. Abood has been trying to sell the property for approximately 1 1/2 to 2 years. Discussion ensued about the condition of the property, which is generally good. There are no code violations, it has been recently inspected, but the tenants come and go, due to the lack of yard, and the size of the building, which is a large, five bedroom rental. There was also discussion about an historic preservation loan or possible grant that Mr. Abood received. LANSING HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION April 28, 1994 S. Whitbeck made a motion to deny the request to allow demolition of 213 E. Hillsdale. Motion was seconded by T. Garzynski. VOTE: yea nay yea nay Blanc X Garzynski X Burleson X Sherman X Busby X Whitbeck X Motion Approved by a vote of 4 to 2. A motion was made to recommend a variance for 533 S. Grand/Chavez Ave. It passed unanimously by a voice vote. A motion was made to adjourn this public hearing. Motion seconded. Approved 11/03/94 To clerk 11/14/94 _ LANSING HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Tt'i;j-, i May 5, 1994; 5:30 p.m. SPECIAL MEETING LNQSi' a MY CLEM"\ Otherwise Gallery 1207 Turner Street Lansing, Michigan 48906 I. CALL TO ORDER The Meeting was called to order at 5:45 p.m. by Chair S. Sawyer -Burleson. Roll call was taken. II. ROLL CALL 1:1 B. C. D. Members in attendance: Mark Bailen Suzanne Sawyer -Burleson Anthony J. Garcynski Stephanie L . Whitbeck Excused Absences: None Fred J. Blanck Robert Busby Wilbur Sherman A quorum of seven members was present, allowing voting action to be taken at the meeting. City Staff: Donna Wynant, Senior Planner E . Guests: Veronica Wilson John Schiessler Don Hartwick Lyle Laylin III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Diana Reedy Mike Hutcheson Emly Horne Karen Shulick A. Add #5 to New Business, an announcement by W. Sherman B . Agenda approved as amended. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Members of the Audience Wishing to Address the Commission 1. Don Hartwick requested that the Commission discuss 601 S . Caesar Chavez. D. Wynant presented an overview of this issue. Discussion ensued. Emphasis was placed on the preliminary nature of this HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION, May 5, 1994 Page 2 proposal which involves a proposed addition onto the subject property which is in the historic district. No plans have been submitted; a building permit has not been applied for. Karen Shulick, 1140 S. Caesar Chavez, asked whether the owners of properties to the South and East were aware of the plans, whether the near -by empty lots had been considered as future location for the building slated to be demolished, and what is the zoning for the building slated to be demolished. (Nearby owners unaware at this point, empty lots may be discussed, no response to the zoning) . A motion was made by A. Garcynski to encourage the continued investigation of preserving the structure at 210 Hillsdale Street, while recognizing the viability of Don Hartwick's plan. Motion seconded by S. Whitbeck. Motion was unanimously approved by a voice vote of 7 to 0. Plans were made for any interested Commission members to meet at 601 S. Caesar Chavez on Monday, May 9, 1994, to inspect the house at 6:00 p.m. B . Veronica Wilson, 201 Strathmore, spoke on behalf of the North Lansing Commercial Historic District Commission. She gave an brief overview of the mission of the commission. C. The Chair introduced several of the visitors present at the meeting. D . There was a considerable amount of discussion concerning the duties of the Historic District Commission. Cherry Hill neighborhood figured prominently in the discussion, more particularly the fact that the more successful the businesses there become, the greater the need for parking space. This involves the Historic District Commission, as demolishing older buildings in this area is the easiest and most common means for creating space. The Commission feels that it will need to be especially vigilant to ensure that the best possible solutions will be achieved. E. The Chair asked that anyone who knew of an historic building or business which would be suitable for board meetings let them know, as it is pleasant to take the meetings out of the downtown area. V. BUSINESS SESSION A. Old Business 1. Review HDC Work Program a. A plea was made by the Chair that issues such as minutes, budgets, legal boundaries of historic districts within the city, etc., be dealt with as soon as possible. D . Wynant stated that monies are from Block Grants, that allocated funds have been spent, but more can be made available. A written report will be forthcoming at the next meeting. The need to make the Building and Code Compliance HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION, May 5, 1994 Page 3 Department aware of the special needs of the Historic District Commission was emphasized. Minutes of past meetings will be transcribed by City Staff; this issue is being dealt with now. In the meantime, the suggestion was made that notes be taken on an agenda at the meeting, photocopied, and sent with agendas for the next meeting. 2. Historic District Ordinance Status a. Copies of the draft which was sent to the City Attorney last week are available. John Roberts is the City Attorney who will be reviewing the draft. It should be complete by June 15, 1994. Mr. Roberts will be contacted next week, concerning meeting with the Commission. We will have a status report by June 2, 1994. It will be in the form of a City Ordinance. Letter from the City Attorney is being placed on file. 3. MSPO Conference, "Improving Community Appearance," Held May 4, 1994. a. Attended by A. Garcynski and by E . Horne. E . Horne brought materials that were copied and passed around. B . New Business 1. North Lansing Study Committee A committee has been put together, and a letter will be drafted that will be sent to the mayor's office A motion was made by A. Garcynski to approve the names that R . Busby has proposed. It was seconded by S. Whitbeck, with a proposed amendment that Bob Morse be included, if he is interested. Motion passed unanimously on a voice vote. Members will include Liz Harrow, Lyle Layland, Don Wilson, Veronica Wilson, Robert Busby. 2. An announcement was made by W . Sherman that his term would be up with the Commission as of June 1, 1994, and he has not decided if he will reapply as of yet. 3. M. Bailen will also be at the end of his term as of June 1, 1994, and will not reapply, as he is moving out of Lansing. 4. D . Wynant passed around Historic Preservation Program materials folders. 5. Proposed Demolition of 808 N . Cedar St. D . Wynant outlined the issue. One possibility is to move the structure to North Lansing. This will be discussed further at the next meeting. 6. Proposed Demolition of "First Airport Hanger" at the Lansing City Airport. A letter of support will be drafted and sent. S . Whitbeck made a motion to the effect that we consider the preservation of the structure, being the first airport hanger in the Lansing City airport, with an amendment being that we ask LCC's teaching lab, which is located at the airport, to send a letter of support. Motion was seconded by M. Bailen. Motion was unanimously approved by a voice vote of 7 to 0. HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION, May 5, 1994 Page 4 T . Garcynski made a motion that a letter be sent to the Lansing City Council, recommending a further investigation of 808 N . Cedar St. for its historical significance, and recommending that any action taken to demolish it be stayed until they can fully account for the historical significance or lack thereof of that property. Second by Robert Busby. Passed by a voice vote of 6 to 0, with one abstention, by S. Whitbeck. C . Committee Reports None D . Other Communications None VI. Adjournment A. A motion was made to adjourn, seconded, and passed unanimously. g:\home\rmubarak\histdist\minutes.may Approved 11/03/94 To Clerk 03/24/95 0i:EMSING HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION r 1r.11 LAINISN`3 CITY CLERK' June 2, 1994; 5:30 p.m. Planning Division Planning & Municipal Development Department Conference Room 119 North Washington Square Annex; 2nd Floor Lansing, Michigan 48933 I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL A. Members S . Whitbeck S . Sawyer -Burleson F . Blanck B . Excused Absences C . City Staff D . Wynant D . Guests Bertha Teddy There was a lack of a quorum for this meeting; therefore, no voting action will be taken. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Advertised Public Hearings None B . Members of the Audience Wishing to Address the Commission Bertha Teddy spoke in reference to her request of April 4, 1994, for assistance for her property at 131 W. Miller Road, to retain wood shingles on a Greek Revival building. She stated that her request was approved at the meeting at which she presented it. She has proceeded, and at the present time has two of the three required bids. D . Wynant will call her Monday to let her know if the grant was approved. HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION, JUNE 2, 1994 PAGE 2 V . BUSINESS SESSION A. Old Business 1. Ordinance The City Attorney should have reviewed the ordinance within the next two weeks. At that point we can begin the public hearing process. 2. Capital City Airport Hanger 3. Recruitment of New HDC members There are now two openings on this Commission. The Mayor's office will have recommendations ready by the July meeting. In the matter of recruitment, there have been several feelers put out, but not much in the way of results. The main thing is to find someone with a demonstrated interest in Historic Preservation. 4. St. Mary's Church - demolition of, The demolition order for this is unavailable at this time. The Department Head is supposed to sign off on all demolition permits before demolition takes place. When the permit is located, D. Wynant will mail a copy of it to all Commission members. B . New Business 1. Board of Water & Light Lighting Scheme VI. ADJOURNMENT Meeting was adjourned at 6:30. Approved 11/03/94 To Clerk 03/24/95 f ?? CITY �� 7 LANSING HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION LI I77 �j C� Efiil July 7, 1994; 5:30 P.M. Planning Division Planning & Neighborhood Development Department Conference Room 119 North Washington Square Annex; 2nd Floor Lansing, Michigan 48933 I. CALL TO ORDER A. The meeting was called to order at 5 : 45 p.m. II. ROLL CALL A. Members S . Sawyer -Burleson S . Whitbeck F. Blanck R. Busby A. Garcynski B . Excused Absences M. J. Wilson C . City Staff D Wynant D. Guests Larry Andrick Diana Reedy III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA A. D. Wynant asked that we add an item under new business, #3, discussion of 213 E. Hillsdale, Demo Request by Andrew Abood. A motion was made to approve the agenda as amended, seconded by F. Blanck, and approved by a voice vote. HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION, JULY 7, 1994 Page 2 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Advertised Public Hearings None B . Members of the Audience Wishing to Address the Commission 1. Larry Andrick, representing Mourer Foster Inc., gave a presentation concerning the building at 615 N. Capitol, including a brief history. Due to remodeling which is taking place, barrier free laws have required an elevator to be installed. Mr. Andrick showed plans of how the elevator could be installed. He subsequently presented a request that the Board write a letter recommending that the State of Michigan Barrier Free Design Commission waive a barrier free requirement for the building, and for consideration of the building as a locally designated structure, based on the buildings historic status. Much discussion ensued. Mr. Andrick stated that Mourer Foster Inc. would be happy to contribute funds and time to making the neighborhood an historic district. A motion was made by A. Garcynski to establish a study committee centered on the Mourer Foster building, which recognizes the historic value of the structure located at 615 N. Capitol, which should not be modified. Also, another motion was made by A. Garcynski that the commission accept Mourer Fosters offer to cover the costs of the study committee, which will include copying costs, photographs, and etc. Both motions were seconded, and passed unanimously on a voice vote. A motion was made for the Historic District Commission to write a letter to the State of Michigan Barrier Free Design Commission recommending that the barrier free requirement for 615 N. Capitol be waived. Motion was seconded and approved unanimously by voice vote. V . BUSINESS SESSION A. Approval of Minutes 1. Minutes of May 5, 1994 An amendment was made, under NEW BUSINESS, in reference to 808 N. Cedar, There was a voice vote passed, with one abstention. The abstaining member was S. Whitbeck. HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION, JULY 7, 1994 Pale 3 A motion was made to approve the minutes of May 5, 1994, as amended, by A. Garcynski, seconded by F. Blanck. Motion approved unanimously by voice vote. B . Old Business 1. Capital City Airport Hanger D. Wynant provided some information. A letter had been received from the Director of the Airport. An offer was made to this group, Michigan Aviation Society, to donate the hanger and provide additional funding up to the cost of demolishing and removing the hanger, to any individual or organization which is willing and financially able to relocate, restore, and maintain the hanger in accordance with the mandate of the Michigan State Historic Preservation Office and the federal government. They are prohibited under federal law from using airport authority funds for purposes other than those which are directly and substantially related to the actual air transportation of passengers or property. D. Wynant had also spoken to someone at the state, who seemed to indicate that the Michigan Aviation Heritage people really needed to come up with a plan to preserve the structure, which it doesn't seem has been done. She also stated that this structure has real significance not only to aviators locally, but nation-wide. 2. Cherry Hill Historic District- information D . Wynant provided a copy of the ordinance which was required to pass the Cherry Hill Historic District. A public hearing was held, wherein five people spoke in favor, none against, and someone requested that three properties on E. Hillsdale, 306, 310, and 314, be excluded from the district. We need to find out how and who makes sure that the Historic designation goes to the County, to register of deeds. 3. Historic District Ordinance- status of, There was a meeting this morning with D. Wynant, A. Garcynski, S. Whitbeck, and J. Roberts of the Attorney's Office to go over the Ordinance. Copies were passed out at tonight's meeting. It was noticed that quite a few handwritten changes had been made. However, most of these changes were slight. There are very few actual changes, mainly in wording. There are some terms which HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION, JULY 7, 1994 Page 4 need to be defined. The committee has made its recommendation to council. A majority of property owners in a declared district must be notified. The local governing body may or may not approve the creation of the district. The Commission is required to define "minor work" and "situations of extreme urgency." The section on Demolition by Neglect was clarified so that the Commission must have prior approval from City Council. At this point, the Commission needs to look at how it will word some of the definitions. The Commission should get it back to the City as soon as possible, so that this can be amended. The August Historic District meeting will be on the 18th. The Work session for the ordinance was set for Monday, July 11, 1994 at 6 : 00 p.m. at Clara's on E . Michigan Avenue. 4. North Lansing's Historic District Study Committee The Study Committee was approved by the Mayor's Office. The Committee is scheduled to meet again in two weeks. 5. Board of Water and Light Lighting Scheme The Public Hearing has been held on this. Information was passed out at the last meeting for discussion. 6. Appointments to HDC Mary Jane Wilson is the newly appointed member of the Historic District Commission. Some information was given concerning Ms. Wilson. The Commission is still in need of an architect who lives in the City of Lansing. During discussion with the Mayor's Office, it was stated that an appointment would not be made this month, but possibly in August. 7. 808 N. Cedar This property has not yet come up before City Council on a "Make Safe or Demolish" order. However, when it does, the Commission will be notified. The possibility of moving the structure was mentioned. 8. Other None HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION, JULY 7, 1994 Pale 5 C. New Business 1. HPP-2-94: 801 Bancroft Court Mark Yepko is looking for financial assistance, mainly for paint and repairs. He previously had assistance in 1992 which was used to repair the foundation, siding, and painting. Mr. Yepko would have to provide the Commission with three bids, and a list of products to be used. He has been looking at colors and paint schemes, and has one bid of $7400. The Commission needs more information before they can approve this request. 2. 615 N. Capitol- Barrier free waiver Discussed under Public Hearings 3. Other 213 E . Hillsdale: Mr. Abood has appealed the decision of the Commission to deny his application for demolition. The Commission discussed the appeal process. They want the appeal to go through the City Attorney's office. 4. Committee Reports None D . Other Communications 1. There is a workshop on September 30, 1994, put on by the state Historic Preservation office at the Labor and Historical Center, called Building Character: Preserving the integrity of Historic Properties. VI. ADJOURNMENT A motion was made by S . Whitbeck to adjourn the meeting at 7 : 35 p.m. Motion seconded, and approved unanimously by a voice vote. Draft to Clerk 08/23/95 Adopted 09/14/95 To Clerk 09/20/95 LANSING HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION August 18, 1994 Planning Division Planning & Neighborhood Development Dept. Conference Room 119 North Washington Square Annex; 2nd Floor Lansing, Michigan 48933 I. CALL TO ORDER A. The meeting was called to order at 6 : 00 p.m. by Chair S . Sawyer - Burleson. Roll call was taken. II. ROLL CALL A. Members in attendance: F . Blanck S . Whitbeck T . Garcynski S . Sawyer -Burleson B . Excused Absences: R. Busby on vacation (Mary Jane Wilson not yet sworn in) C . City Staff: D . Wynant D . Guests: Diana Reedy Mark J . Yepko III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Donna Brockwell A. A motion was made by A. Garcynski and seconded by F. Blanck, to approve the agenda as amended, passed unanimously by voice vote, with the following items: 1. Old Business: a. #5: Out -going communication, Mourer/Foster b . #6 : Tie-up loose ends 2. Response to City Attorney 3. Letter RE: 403 N. Sycamore Clarification 4. Communications: N . L . H . D . Study Committee Report IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Advertised Public Hearings: None B . Members of the Audience Wishing to Address the Commission: (Mark Yepko wished to speak under this portion of the agenda regarding HPP- 2-94) . HPP-2-94: 805 Bancroft Court: Members questioned loan appropriation for work -only facade. This is a future consideration. HISTORIC DISTRILLI COMMISSION AUGUST 18, 15,4 kTB Paqe 2 A motion was made by T . Garzynski to approve matching funds up to $4, 000 and direct staff to review other funding available in this division, to report back by Sept. 1, 1994. Seconded by F . Blanck. Motion approved unanimously. BUSINESS SESSION A. Old Business 1. Election of Officers - This will be done at the Sept. 1, 1994 HDC meeting. 2. HPP-2-94: 805 Bancroft Court (This was handled under "Audience Wishing to Address the Commission") 3. HPP-3-94: 920 N. Washington Ave. (This will be addressed at the September 1, 1994 HDC meeting. ) 4. 808 N. Cedar- Status of requested demolition- (handled under other communications) 5. Outgoing Communication to Mourer/Foster: Letter for waiver on elevator to be reviewed at the Sept. 1, 1994 meeting. 6. List of unfinished business: see attached list. B . New Business 1. WKAR Program (A Nostalgic Look at the Past- of things that no longer exist in the Lansing Area) . D. Wynant reported on a call received from Rachel Targoff of WKAR for a program to be aired in March that would feature a nostalgic look at downtown Lansing. WKAR is looking for oral histories and old photographs of the greater Lansing area. Wynant directed her to JoAnne Jager of the Local History Room of the Lansing Public Library. 2. Committee Reports (Ordinance Subcommittee) Discussion took place regarding the public hearing on the Historic District Ordinance. The agreed upon date was September 29, 1994, at 6 : 00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. 3. HDC Transmittal Letter to City Attorney: S . Sawyer -Burleson prepared a letter highlighting changes to the Historic District Ordinance based on the July 11, 1994 meeting. S. Whitbeck made a motion to send the letter to Jack Roberts, City Attorney's Office. Motion seconded by F. Blanck. Motion was unanimously approved by a voice vote of 4 to 0. C . Other Communications 1. "Building Character: Preserving the Integrity of Historic Properties" Workshop on Sept. 30, 1994. D. Wynant indicated that any Commission members interested in this workshop would be covered in the registration fee. 2. A letter regarding 403 N. Sycamore was received and placed on file. This letter is dated August 12, 1994, and was received by the chairperson on August 17, 1994. It was written to Robert Morris, regarding the administrative modification request for this property, from Jack Nelson of the Building Safety Office, requesting an exemption on the porch railings. 3. North Lansing Historic District Study Committee: A. Garcynski reported on his conversation with David Wiener regarding the list HISTORIC DISTRIu-L COMMISSION AUGUST 18, 15�4 Paqe 3 of names submitted for this committee who said he did not expect any problems with these appointments. A copy of the North Lansing Historic Study Committee report was distributed for the HDC's review. This report will be discussed further at the Sept. 1, 1994, meeting. 4. 808 N . Cedar Street: D . Wynant reported that the make safe or demolish order on this property will be discussed at the Public Services Committee of the City Council August 23, 1994 at 3:45 p.m. 5. Historic Markers: HDC will discuss this at the Sept. 1, 1994 meeting. Wynant will call the Bureau of History to get a list of existing markers in Lansing. VI. ADJOURNMENT A. Garcynski made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8 : 00 p.m. Motion was seconded by F. Blanck. Motion was unanimously approved by a voice vote of 4to0. !,. f t r r. .` . 4�, � � �� �_ , j Approved 11/03/94 ( To Clerk 11/14/94 LANSING HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION L 11. P li 51 13 CITY CLERii Sept. 8, 1994; 5:30 P.M. Planning Division Planning & Neighborhood Development Department Conference Room 119 North Washington Square Annex; 2nd Floor Lansing, Michigan 48933 I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 5 :40 p.m. by Chair S. Sawyer -Burleson. Roll call was taken. II. ROLL CALL A. Members S. Sawyer -Burleson A. Garcynski S. Whitbeck M. J. Wilson R. Busby B . Excused Absences Fred Blanck C . City Staff D . Wynant D . Guests Emly Horne Paul Scott III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There was one addition to the agenda, under Old Business, item 0, Election of Officers, moved over from last agenda. A motion was made by A. Garcynski to approve the agenda as amended, seconded by S. Whitbeck. Motion approved unanimously by a voice vote. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A . Advertised Public Hearings None B . Members of the Audience Wishing to Address the Commission HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 8, 1994 Page 2 Paul Scott would like to address the commission, but will do so under New Business, item 1. V . BUSINESS SESSION A. Approval of Minutes 1. Minutes of April 28, 1994: Discussion took place concerning some of the language used. a. The Commission wanted it noted for the record that Robert Kocsis is not only a property owner for 535 Townsend, but also the listing agent for Andrew Abood. b. Diane Reedy, guest, commented. c. Jesse Lothamer offered an alternative which did not involve demolition of the Abood property. d. Mr. Abood reduced the number of units in his building from 2 to 1, during his ownership. A motion was made by S . Whitbeck to approve the minutes of April 28, 1994, as amended. Seconded by A. Garcynski. The motion was approved unanimously by a voice vote. 2. Minutes of May 5, 1994, were not ready for discussion. B . Old Business 0. Election of Officers a. Discussion took place concerning the addition of a vice - chair, and a "first vice -chair". Also, the addition of an executive committee was discussed. A motion was made by S . Whitbeck, seconded by A. Garcynski, that S . Sawyer -Burleson will continue on as chairperson for the next year. Motion passed unanimously by a voice vote. A motion was made by S . Whitbeck, seconded by R . Busby, that A. Garcynski be vice -chair. Motion passed unanimously by a voice vote. b. The addition of a "first vice -chair", and an executive committee, were discussed some more. The by-laws must be amended to add these positions. This will be further discussed at the next meeting. 1. Cherry Hill Historic District: Information D . Wynant presented information concerning the Cherry Hill Historic District. Copies of the Official Ordinance were passed out. HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 8, 1994 PaLre 3 2. North Lansing's Historic District Study Committee S . Sawyer -Burleson read a communication from the Mayor's office dated August 30, 1994, into the record, confirming the North Lansing Historic Study Committee as endorsed by this Commission. The communication was signed and written by David Weiner of the Mayors office. Copies were made and handed out to the Commission. Appointments to HDC The Commission is still looking for an architect with preservation background, who is a resident of Lansing. Jon Bauer and Jim Perkins were mentioned as possibilities. 4. 615 N. Capitol, follow-up on district status Postponed until next meeting, October 6, 1994. We need a letter to establish a district and an agreement. 5. Friedland Office building demo, status of This building has already been demolished. The Commission would like a copy of the demolition permit for this property and for St. Mary's Church. Discussion took place concerning the process of obtaining a demolition permit. 6. State Hearings Division- Public Hearing on 9/9/94 regarding denial of demolition permit at 213 E. Hillsdale A verbatim transcript of the public hearing of April 28. 1994, will go to this meeting. D. Wynant gave a brief overview of the case as it stands at this time. Mention was made of the possibility of the State Journal moving their offices at some point in the future, which would leave the parking lot adjacent to 213 E. Hillsdale (possibly) available. C . New Business 1. 808 N. Cedar: Short and Long Term Goals in its preservation. Other Greek Revivals will also be discussed. (Paul Scott to address the Commission) The General Services Committee of the City Council heard this case (808 N. Cedar); they gave the owners 60 days to make some progress with this building. This time will be up at the end of October. Paul Scott made a presentation concerning 808 N. Cedar, and Greek Revival Architecture in the City of Lansing in general. He stated that the owner of this property is concerned with saving HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 8, 1994 Page 4 the building, but not necessarily on this lot. He also stated that there are only approximately 19 Greek Revival buildings left in Lansing. 808 N. Cedar Street is probably the best example of Greek Revival architecture in the city. The house appears on the 1859 map of the city. He stated that in other cities in Michigan which have local registry programs, the impetus began with one particular house. He felt that possibly this house could be THE house to get Lansing on track. He also emphasized that he feels that the house is going to have to be moved in order to save it at all. He feels that something like this is the way to sell preservation in the City of Lansing. D . Wynant inquired if possibly something could be worked out with the owners of the property to shore up the building, so that the City could see some progress. She feels that if the owners were willing to make some investments into the property, the City would be more willing to deal with them. S . Whitbeck mentioned that the structural members of the house are riddled with termites. She stated that the foundation beams are massive, but very fragile. The Commission wanted it known that Fred Sibel is not the owner of this property; anyone interested should know that an executed power of attorney will be necessary before proceeding. There was discussion as to whether this is a project that the Commission wants, and is able to, get involved with. They decided that this topic that would be looked at on a recurring basis. The Commission asked Mr. Scott to keep them updated. 2. Other a. An Historic Preservation workshop will take place on September 30, 1994, at the Bureau of History. The Planning Office will register any Commission members who wish to attend. 3. Committee Reports Historic District Ordinance- status of, a. D. Wynant reported that she had briefly spoken with J. Roberts of the City Attorney's Office. He stated to her that the necessary revisions were more than likely minor. They do need to discuss the delegation of the authority to sign a preliminary notice to proceed. A public hearing date had been decided upon, at the end of September. However, as the Ordinance has not yet come back from the Attorney's office, and as another work session would be necessary after the Ordinance comes back, the end of September seems to be impractical. The HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 8, 1994 Pale 5 current ordinance will expire in December, so a public hearing needs to be done before that. The Commission would like to have its own public hearing, with the results to go before the Physical Development Committee, then before City Council for a public hearing. The Commission decided to send out a mailing, to include a copy of the Ordinance and the public notice, to neighborhood groups, current historic districts, and proposed historic districts. It was mentioned that a notice should go into the State Journal, and reporter for the "Your Neighborhood" column, should be there as well. Notices and Ordinances should also be sent to the Historical Society, and the Council for the Humanities. There were several other groups mentioned, including business groups. The proposed date was for September 29, at 6:00 p.m. The materials could be ready early next week. 4. Other Communications a. A walking tour of five downtown Lansing churches is next Sunday, starting at 2 : 00 p.m. There is no charge. It is a walk-through, to look at the architectural aspects of the churches. VI. ADJOURNMENT A. M. J. Wilson made a motion to adjourn, seconded by S. Whitbeck. Motion to adjourn approved unanimously by a voice vote, at 7 : 30 p.m. -'Draft to Clerk 10/07/94 -17% Approved 10/13/94 To Clerk 10/19/94 �„ c1 LANSING HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION October 6, 1994; 7:00 p.m. LANSI�,U CITY CLEM( SPECIAL MEETING Planning Division City Council Chambers, Lansing City Hall Lansing, Michigan 48933 I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:16 p.m. by Chair S . Sawyer -Burleson. Roll Call was taken. II. ROLL CALL A. Members in attendance: Suzanne Sawyer -Burleson Stephanie L. Whitbeck Anthony J. Garcynski Mary Jane Wilson B . Excused Absences: Robert Busby Fred J. Blanck C. A quarum of four members was present, allowing voting action to be taken at the meeting. D . City Staff : Donna Wynant, Senior Planner E. Guests: Donna Reedy Emly Horne Joan Sheldon III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA S . Whitbeck made a motion to amend the agenda by adding "Section V . Old Business. Ordinance." Motion seconded by A. Garcynski. Motion was unanimously approved by a voice vote of 4 to 0. IV. PUBLIC HEARING A. Advertised Public Hearing: Chapter 1220: Revised Historic District Ordinance S. Sawyer -Burleson presented an overview of the public hearing. Lansing Historic District Commission October 6, 1994 D. Wynant then presented an overview of the proposed ordinance. She provided background and high -lighted the ordinance. The ordinance brings the City into compliance with the 1992 State law. City has lost out on revenue because we cannot be designated a certified local government until our ordinance conforms to State law. Displayed and discussed two charts which stated: Revisions to the Historic District Ordinance * Duties of the Historic District Study Committee. * Composition of the Commission is revised. * Clarification of Permit Process. * Appeals process for those aggrieved by Decision of the Commission. * Problem of "Demolition by Neglest" and Unapproved Changes in Historic District Resources is Addressed. * Clarifies ongoing designation activities and provides procedures and standards for eliminating established local Historic Districts. * Council would now be allowed to temporarily protect Historic Resources while going through the process for Historic Designation. * Establishes fines for violation of ordinance. Historic Districts: Procedure for Establishment Under New Ordinance * Request for District is made to Council. * Council approves Mayoral Appointments to study committe for Prospective District. * Study Committee 1. Conducts Photographic Inventory. 2. Conducts basic research. 3. Determines number and percentage of Historic and Non - Historic Resources in District. 4. Prepares Preliminary Historic District Study. 5. Sends Report to Planning Board, Bureau of History, and the State Historic Preservation Review Board. 6. Makes Copies Available to Public. * Committee shall submit final report with Recommendations to City Council within one year of the Public Hearing. * City Council may introduce and oridnance to establish a district if all of the following occur: 1. Has received final report. 2. Received a petition signed by majority of owners approving of their property within the Proposed District. 3. (Public Hearing) (orally added at public hearing) * City Clerk files property descriptions to be included in District within 14 days after the ordinance becomes effective. A. Garcynski presented comments relative to the State's enabling legislation which the Historic District Commission followed extremely closely in the development of this proposed ordinance so that the ordinance would not be able to be legally challenged. Pointed out that Commission worked with Jack Roberts of the Lansing City Attorney's Office. -z- Lansing- Historic District Commission October 6, 1994 S . Sawyer -Burleson read into the record of this Public Hearing the written comments received by the Commission. These two letters are attached to the written record of the Public Hearing and are incorporated by reference. 1. Letter from the Downtown Neighborhood Association, signed by Joan Sheldon. The DNA generally supports the proposed ordinance but requests clarification on several questions. 2. Letter from Sharon Kellogg, former Chair of the Historic District Commission, member and former President of the Downtown Neighborhood Association, property owner in an existing Historic District. Personal comments supporting the proposed ordinance and pointed out several issues which the City should handle internally which would eliminate problems which, from time to time, occur in Historic Districts. B . Members of the Audience wishing to address the Commission on the Public Hearing. Joan Sheldon, 726 Seymour, Lansing, spoke on behalf of the Downtown Neighborhood Association in support of the proposed ordinance. Stated that historical preservation holds the downtown together. Understands that the ordinance must follow the statute. Also, spoke on a personal basis in support of the ordinance. A. Garcynski responded orally to the questions posed in the letter from the Downtown Neighborhood Association and indicated that the Commission would provide the answers in writing: Reference 1220.03(g), pages 18 and 19, can a pending permit application be denied during an emergency moratorium. If denied would this remove the "threat of irreparable harm" referred to in the paragraph? If a site is being designated, a moratorium would stop it from being demolished or altered. How exactly is a historic district established. If an area is chosen, researched, and residents notified for a public hering, what happens if they balk. Is it ultimately the Historic Commission's call ... the City Council's ... or by a ballot? Earlier in the Public Hearing this evening, the procedure for establishing a District was described ... the procedure involves the property owners in the proposed district would be involved. Critically, for an Historic District to be established it requires that 50 0 of the property owners approve it by "ballot" on a petition and the City Council must formally approve an ordinance which sets forth the boundaries of the District. 3. Are all houses in a district automatically subject to the restrictions, or only those determined to have historic value? Any and all buildings in a district wuld be subject to restrictions but districts can be gerry-mandered if there is a problem. Ima Lansing Historic District Commission October 6, 1994 4. The ordinance seems to be restricted to the exterior appearance of the homes; does this affect the density of population that exists in many large old homes which have been converted into dupleses, and three and four families? State enabling legislation (and, therefore, this ordinance) limites us to exteriors of buildings or interior work only to the extent that it shows on the exterior. It does not give the Historic District Commission or ordinance any zoning controls. Unrelated to the ordinance, the Commission, like anyone else, can make recommendations to the appropriate Boards of the City on such matters as variances or concerns related to zoning. 5. Will the Historic Commission do a thorough job of identifying properties that should be preserved and create their own list of sites with property owners notified and tax rolls annotated so future owners can be notified? We will want to do additional investigation of areas or specific sites which shoudl be formally designated as Districts, but we will not do it alone: the entire process of study groups requires that private citizens and neighborhood groups are involved. It is a requirement of the ordinance that the City Clerk's job to see that information is recorded on deeds in the Register of Deed's Office so that owners and future owners will know that a property lies within an historic District. 6. Sections 1220.09, Demolition by Neglect, and Section 1220.10, Work without permit, are scary. Why would an owner want to be part of a Historic District if the Commission could have work done without the owners approval and charge the property owner for it through tax assessments or the courts? Demolition by neglect and work without a permit are powerful tools. Yes, at first look they can seem scary. However, at the core they are enforcement and safety issues which protect whole neighborhoods. It needs to be noted that such a strong matter must go through the City Council and not just theCommission. 7. Will a program be developed to show off historical homes like other cities do? We would like to investigate the issue of home tours as is done in Grand Ledge. Additionally, we hope that the City will budget funds to pruchase signs to designate Historic Districts as every city in the State does. 8. Is there a financial incentive to belong to a Historic District? Yes and no. The Community Development funded Historic Preservation program is income contingent. While one gives up some personal control to the requirements of the ordinance, property owners are protected when other properties are properly preserved and maintained. -4- I - Lansing Historic District Commission October 6, 1994 S. Whitbeck pointed out that an important way to look at the Historic District ordinance is as an "insurance policy" for property owners. First, property values are maintained when other proeprties are not permitted to deteriorate. Second, property values are increased when repairs and improvements are done using historic preservation standards. Emly Horne, 110 W. Hodge, Lansing. Member of the Lansing Planning Board, appearing on their behalf. Indicated that on Tuesday, October 4, 1994, the Lnaisng Planning Board unanimously approved the proposed Historic District ordinance, 8 to 0. S. Whitbeck indicated that Linda Peckham (Historic Society) had indicated that she had intended to attend the Public Hearing and support the ordinance. V. OLD BUSINESS A. Historic District Ordinance S. Whitbeck made a motion that the Commission approve the Ordinance for final adoption and that we forward the ordinance and transcript/minutes of tonight's Public Hearing to the Lansing City Council for their passage of the ordinance. Motion was seconded by A. Garcynski . Motion was unanimously approved by a voice vote of 4 to 0. VI. ADJOURNMENT A. Garcynski made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8 :10 p.m. Motion was seconded by S. Whitbeck. Motion was unanimously approved by a voice vote of 4 to 0. ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 letters attached and incorporated to these minutes M-C Downtown Neighborhood Association TO: FROM: RE: P.O. Box 11164 Lansing, Michigan 48W9 Mu"uh Donna Wynant, Senior Planner Department of Planning and Neighborhood Development Joan Sheldon, 726 Seymour, Lansing 48906 Representing the Downtown Neighborhood Association (DNA) Proposed Revisions to the Historic District Ordinance The Downtown Neighborhood Association surveyed 10 members of the organi- zation who are actively involved in historic preservation, especially in the downtown residential area of Lansing. The ordinance was generally supported as proposed, but there are a few ques- tions that the DNA needs clarification on before final passage. Reference 1220.03(g), pages 18 and 19, can a pending permit applica- tion be denied during an emergency moratorium. If denied, would this remove the "threat of irreparable harm" referred to in the paragraph. How exactly is a historic district established. If an area is chosen, researched and residents notified for a public hearing, what happens if 0 they balk. Is -it ultimately the Historic Commission's call ... the City Council's... or by a ballot. Are all houses in a district automatically subject to the restrictions, or only those determined to have historic value. The ordinance seems to be restricted to the exterior appearance of the homes; does this affect the density of population that exists in many i large old homes which have been converted into duplexes, and three and four families. Will the Historic Commission do a thorough job of identifying properties that should be preserved and create their own list of sites with property owners notified and tax rolls annotated so future owners can be notified. Sections 1220.09 Demolition by Neglect and Section 1220.10 Work Without Permit are scary. Why would an owner want to be part of a Historic District if the Commission could have work done without the owners approval and charge the property owner for it through tax assesments or the courts. Will a program be developed to show off historical homes like other cities do. i Is there a financial incentive to belong to a Historical District. i These are some of the questions that the DNA would like commented on, in writing, to distribute to board members and residents who participated in this Historic District Ordinance review process. IEWFIA 001( TO: Historic District Corn ission FROM Sharon L. Kellog RE: Public Hearing --revisions to Historic District Ordinance DATE: October 6, 1994- As the first chair of the Historic. District Commission, and an advocate of old house restoration, I'd like to commend you for the effort put forth to develop these revisions to our ordinance. I am also a member and former president of the Downtown Neighborhood Association, but my remarks reflect only my personal views on this subject. These proposed changes are essential if we are serious about preserving our housing stock, which is one of our city's assets. Aside from the ordinance revisions, I believe it is critical that the City departments responsible for code enforcement of rental properties and for regulation of historic districts coordinate efforts on exterior repairs of properties in historic districts. The Cherry Hill Historic District is an example of the problems that arise from no coordination. The Commission should also consider methods of identifying historic districts and for developing incentives for owners of property in historic districts. As a Realtor, I would also like to suggest a procedure where disclosure of property in historic districts shows up on title commitments. While these comments have been about issues unrelated to the new ordinance, I commend the Commission for making the enabling legislation as easy as possible to understand on the local Ievel. As I understand the Commission's task, there wasn't discretion on what issues could or could not be included, but that the City ordinance must conform to the statute. Once in place, Lansing will finally be able to receive funds from the State. A West Ionia .Lansing, Michigan 48933 517-487-6975 {- S }, : (•, Draft to Clerk 10/21/94 Approved 11/03/94 To Clerk 03/24/95 27 UaI'NIJ CH i CLEMANSING HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION October 13, 1994; 5:30 P.M. Planning & Neighborhood Development Department Planning Division Conference Room 119 North Washington Square Annex; 2nd Floor Lansing, Michigan 48933 I. CALL TO ORDER A. The meeting was called to order by Chair S . Sawyer -Burleson at 5 : 40 p.m. II. ROLL CALL 1. Members: F . Blanck R . Busby S . Whitbeck T . Garcynski S . Sawyer -Burleson 2. Excused Absences: Mary Jane Wilson 3. City Staff: D . Wynant 4. Guests: R . Karp D . Reedy D . Sykes G . Brydges H. Hernandez M. Gillison III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA A. A motion was made by S . Whitbeck to amend the agenda to include the minutes of October 6, 1994, and the inclusion of discussion with Building Safety staff under new business. Seconded by R . Busby. Agenda has been amended by unanimous voice vote. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Advertised Public Hearings None Historic District Commission, October 13, 1994 Page 2 2. Members of the Audience Wishing to Address the Commission None V. BUSINESS SESSION A. Discussion with Department of Planning and Neighborhood Development Staff . S. Sawyer -Burleson discussed the issues that the Board will be facing in the next year or so. She also informed Mr. Sykes, Director of the Department of Planning and Neighborhood Development, of the problem that is occurring between the Board and the City Clerk's office. The Historical District Commission is not in compliance with the Charter, of having minutes on file with the Clerk's office. Also, the Board may not be in compliance with the open meetings act. The reason that the Clerk is concerned is that City Council may not act on the Historic District Ordinance, due to the lack of compliance with the charter. Any action taken cannot be fully acted upon without full compliance. The Board understands that there are several problems, including lack of staff; however, this issue has been known for at least six months. D . Sykes stated that he believed that Rhonda (secretarial staff) was now to be working on these minutes. He also stated that this is a recent development, and that he felt that minutes from 1994 should be dealt with first, then the older minutes. He asserted that he would discuss this issue with the City Clerk, to see what the Clerk needs now, in order to move this forward. Posting of agendas was also discussed. D . Sykes spoke about the signage issue in Old Town, which will be going to E.D.C. He wanted the Board to know that this proposal is being dealt with. The Board is wondering how to go about this. They will research styles, what other communities have done, and costs of signs. The Board spoke to Mr. Hernandez concerning the interaction of Historic standards and the Building Office. Mr. Hernandez referred the issue to Mr. Brydges, Chief Building Inspector. Discussion ensued between the Board, Mr. Brydges, Mr. Hernandez, and Mr. Gillison. It was determined that the most important thing needed from Code Compliance and Building, is the courtesy to let the Historic District Commission look at any repairs required by Code Compliance, or building permits obtained through the Building Office. If this occurs, the appearance of the district will improve, and fund information can be dispersed. Mr. Hernandez offered to add a paragraph to all Code Compliance letters sent to properties in historic districts to notify the owners of the necessary requirements. Historic District Commission, October 13, 1994 Page 3 D. Wynant mentioned that there would be two interns starting in November to work on Historic issues, one working exclusively with Cherry Hill. B . Approval of Minutes -October 6, 1994 An amendment was made to October 6, 1994 minutes, on Page 3, last paragraph, third line from bottom (was 510, change to 50 0) . The Board changed the 1150 0" to read "the majority". A motion was made to approve, as amended. Motion Seconded. Motion carried. C . New Business 1. HPP-4-94: 1208/1210/1212 Turner Street A presentation was made by D. Wynant and R. Karp of Buildtech Ltd. , concerning these properties. Mr. Karp represents a tax- exempt, non-profit company, of which R. Busby is the president. Mr. Busby is not taking part in the vote on this issue. The property is proposed to have three units of residential housing on the second floor, with commercial/retail on the first. The requested funding is for renovation on four facades. Money is raised up front, no rents are being considered in construction. They are asking for $20,000 from the Historic Preservation Program for exterior restoration to four facades. A motion was made by S . Whitbeck that the maximum amount possible, $20, 000, be approved. Seconded by T. Garcynski. R. Busby abstained from the discussion and the voting. The motion was passed unanimously. 2. Historic Preservation Program -Review of Proposed Brochure This will be presented next month. D . Old Business 1. North Lansing's Historic District Study The Historic District Study Committee has been endorsed by this Commission and approved by the Mayor. We still need the resolution to go to City Council. The resolution has been put together, and when the letter is completed, it will go to Council for confirmation. The Board will see the study at the next meeting. Historic District Commission, October 13, 1994 Page 4 2. 615 N. Capitol -follow up on district status A letter needs to be sent to the owners of this building. The Commission recommended that an exemption be granted in this case. Now the case goes to the Barrier Free Design Board. 3. Demolition of Buildings -information request: -Friedland Office building, E. Maple; St. Mary's building a. St. Mary's Building: Demolished without a permit. Discussion took place concerning demolition and the lack of communication between the Historic District Commission and the Planning and Building Staff, especially concerning demolition permits. b. Friedland's Office Building on E. Maple: Already Demolished. The permit apparently was not sent up to the Planning Office for their approval. 4. State Hearings Division-213 E. Hillsdale a. This case will be taken up by the State in February of 1995. However, Mr. Abood has applied for another demolition permit. He claims that he has additional information, and wants the case re -heard. The Board does not feel that they want to do this again. The Board wants to wait for the State. The City Attorney needs to review the case. 5. 808 N. Cedar -Status a. David Thomas, of Lansing City Magazine, has a real interest in 808 N. Cedar. D . Wynant agreed to contact him regarding the possible purchase of this property. 6. Report on 9-13-94 Conference: "Building Character: Preserving the Integrity of Historic Properties" a. Typed up notes of the conference were passed around. Discussion took place. 7. Other Communications a. The Ordinance Committee is finished, we have voted on the ordinance, passed it on to City Council, it is complete in its form, and out of our hands. Historic District Commission, October 13, 1994 VI. ADJOURNMENT Page 5 A. A motion was made to adjourn at 7 : 45 by S . Whitbeck, seconded by A. Garcynski. The motion passed unanimously by voice vote. HISTORIC DISTRICT ORDINANCE Proposed Revisions CITY COUNCIL 10/14/94 REASON FOR NEW ORDINANCE A major amendment to Michigan's Enabling Legislation for Historic Preservation, P.A. 96, was signed into law on June 18, 1992. This Act supersedes P.A. 169, 1970. The City of Lansing is obligated to comply with the provisions of the new state statute whether a part of our ordinance or not. According to the State of Michigan, we need to amend those portions of our ordinance that are in conflict with state statute. BENEFITS OF NEW ORDINANCE One of the benefits of having an ordinance that is brought into compliance with P.A. 96 is that it makes us eligible for Certified Local Government status, which enables us to apply for especially earmarked grants from the State Historic Presevation Officer. At least 10 percent of the annual Historic Preservation Fund grant made to Michigan under the National Historic Preservation Act must be distributed to the Certified Local Governments. This status will also provide for expanded local participation in identification, evaluation, and protection of historic properties which is now the sole purview of the state. HIGHLIGHTS OF NEW ORDINANCE Section 1220.01 Purpose Statement The language added here: "Regulate the construction, addition, alteration, repair, moving, excavation, and demolition of resources in historic districts." Section 1220.0: Definitions Added: -Certificate of Appropriateness -Demolition by Neglect: This refers to neglect in maintaining, repairing, or securing a resource that results in deterioration of an exterior feature of the resource or the loss of structural integrity of the resource. This is addressed in section 1220.09. -Notice to Proceed: Written permission to issue a permit for work that is inappropriate and that adversely affects a resource addressed in section 1220.08. -Situation of Extreme Urgency: Involves immediate considerations of public health, safety and welfare for a person or persons in respect to a specific property. -Preliminary notice to proceed: Issued by an official of the Planning Office in situations of urgent circumstances as addressed in section 1220.08 (b) 1220.03 Procedure for Establishment -Procedures for establishing a district has been substantially changed. These are outlined on the attached pages. -How to Eliminate an area's designation as a Historic District has been added. -Council now has the ability to adopt a resolution requiring all applications for permits in a proposed historic district be referred to the commission (up to one year). -Council now has the ability to declare by resolution an emergency moratorium for a period not to exceed 6 months if it is found that pending work will cause irreparable harm to resources located in an established historic district or a proposed historic district. Section 1220.04 Composition of the Historic District Commission Nine members are proposed compared to seven members in the current ordinance. Section 1220.05 Powers and Duties of Commission Typically permits reviewed by the Commission pertain to exterior work. However, interior work may be reviewed if it will cause a visible change to the exterior of the resource. Certificate of approval or a notice to proceed has been added to the ordinance that is granted by the Commission once a permit has been approved. Other Provisions in this section include: 1. Filing an appeal to any Commission decision is now made to the State Historic Preservation Review Board. 2. Review of permits and plans according to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings. Section.06 Procedure for Review of Permit Application with Certificates of Approval. Section 1220.07 Removal or Demolition of District Resources Four conditions must prevail to grant a certificate of approval to remove or demolish a district resource. Section 1220.08 Notices to Proceed and Preliminary Notice to Proceed Section 1220.09 Demolition by Neglect Allows the Commission to require an owner to repair all conditions contributing to demolition by neglect. If repairs are not made within reasonable time, the Commission may make such repairs as are necessary to prevent demolition by neglect with the costs charged to the owner, or leveed as a special assessment against the property. Section 1220.11 Yard Variances The Historic District Commission may recommend to the BZA that a variance to standard yard requirements be made. Section 1220.99 Penalties Violation of this ordinance is a civil violation punishable by fines of up to $5,000. HISTORIC DISTRICT PROCEDURES FOR ESTABLISHMENT UNDER OLD ORDINANCE: A. Petition by 60% of Property Owners. B. District Commission Study of Historic and Architectural Significance. C. Commission Preliminary Report with Recommendations. D. Public Hearing Before Historic District Commission. E. Final Report with Draft Ordinance Submitted to City Council. F. Ordinance Approval by City Council. G. Develop Standards for Preservation in the District. UNDER NEW ORDINANCE: A. Request for District is made to Council. B. Council Approves Mayoral Appointments to Study Committee for Prospective District. C. Study Committee: 1. Conducts Photograhic Inventory. 2. Conducts Basic Research. 3. Determines Number and Percentage of Historic and Non Historic Resources in District. 4. Prepares Preliminary Historic District Study. 5. Sends Report to Planning Board, Bureau of History, and the State Historic Preservation Review Board. 6. Makes Copies Available to Public. 7. Conducts Public Hearing Within 60 Days of Transmittal of the Preliminary Report. D. Committee Shall Submit Final Report With Recommendations to City Council Within One Year of the Public Hearing. E. City Council May Introduce an Ordinance to Establish a District if All of the Following Occur: 1. Has Received Final Report. 2. Received a Petition Signed by Majority of Owners Approving of their Property Within the Proposed District. F. City Clerk Files Property Descriptions to be included in District Within 14 days after the Ordinance Becomes Effective. Draft to Clerk 10/07/94 Approved 10/13/94 To Clerk 10/19/94 LANSING HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION October 6, 1994; 7:00 p.m. SPECIAL MEETING Planning Division City Council Chambers, Lansing City Hall Lansing, Michigan 48933 I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:16 p.m. by Chair S. Sawyer -Burleson. Roll Call was taken. II. ROLL CALL A. Members in attendance: Suzanne Sawyer -Burleson Stephanie L. Whitbeck Anthony J. Garcynski Mary Jane Wilson B. Excused Absences: Robert Busby Fred J. Blanck C. A quarum of four members was present, allowing voting action to be taken at the meeting. D . City Staff: Donna Wynant, Senior Planner E . Guests: Donna Reedy Emly Horne Joan Sheldon III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA S . Whitbeck made a motion to amend the agenda by adding "Section V . Old Business. Ordinance." Motion seconded by A. Garcynski. Motion was unanimously approved by a voice vote of 4 to 0. IV. PUBLIC HEARING A. Advertised Public Hearing: Chapter 1220: Revised Historic District Ordinance ` S. Sawyer -Burleson presented an overview of the public hearing. Lansing Historic District Commission October 6, 1994 D . Wynant then presented an overview of the proposed ordinance. She provided background and high -lighted the ordinance. The ordinance brings the City into compliance with the 1992 State law. City has lost out on revenue because we cannot be designated a certified local government until our ordinance conforms to State law. Displayed and discussed two charts which stated: Revisions to the Historic District Ordinance * Duties of the Historic District Study Committee. * Composition of the Commission is revised. * Clarification of Permit Process. * Appeals process for those aggrieved by Decision of the Commission. * Problem of "Demolition by Neglest" and Unapproved Changes in Historic District Resources is Addressed. * Clarifies ongoing designation activities and provides procedures and standards for eliminating established local Historic Districts. * Council would now be allowed to temporarily protect Historic Resources while going through the process for Historic Designation. * Establishes fines for violation of ordinance. Historic Districts: Procedure for Establishment Under New Ordinance * Request for District is made to Council. * Council approves Mayoral Appointments to study committe for Prospective District. * Study Committee 1. Conducts Photographic Inventory. 2. Conducts basic research. 3. Determines number and percentage of Historic and Non - Historic Resources in District. 4. Prepares Preliminary Historic District Study. 5. Sends Report to Planning Board, Bureau of History, and the State Historic Preservation Review Board. 6. Makes Copies Available to Public. * Committee shall submit final report with Recommendations to City Council within one year of the Public Hearing. * City Council may introduce and oridnance to establish a district if all of the following occur: 1. Has received final report. 2. Received a petition signed by majority of owners approving of their property within the Proposed District. 3. (Public Hearing) (orally added at public hearing) * City Clerk files property descriptions to be included in District within 14 days after the ordinance becomes effective. A. Garcynski presented comments relative to the State's enabling legislation which the Historic District Commission followed extremely closely in the development of this proposed ordinance so that the ordinance would not be able to be legally challenged. Pointed out that Commission worked with Jack Roberts of the Lansing City Attorney's Office. -2- Lansing Historic District Commission October 6, 1994 S . Sawyer -Burleson read into the record of this Public Hearing the written comments received by the Commission. These two letters are attached to the written record of the Public Hearing and are incorporated by reference. 1. Letter from the Downtown Neighborhood Association, signed by Joan Sheldon. The DNA generally supports the proposed ordinance but requests clarification on several questions. 2. Letter from Sharon Kellogg, former Chair of the Historic District Commission, member and former President .of the Downtown Neighborhood Association, property owner in an existing Historic District. Personal comments supporting the proposed ordinance and pointed out several issues which the City should handle internally which would eliminate problems which, from time to time, occur in Historic Districts. B . Members of the Audience wishing to address the Commission on the Public Hearing. Joan Sheldon, 726 Seymour, Lansing, spoke on behalf of the Downtown Neighborhood Association in support of the proposed ordinance. Stated that historical preservation holds the downtown together. Understands that the ordinance must follow the statute. Also, spoke on a personal basis in support of the ordinance. A. Garcynski responded orally to the questions posed in the letter from the Downtown Neighborhood Association and indicated that the Commission would provide the answers in writing: 1. Reference 1220.03(g), pages 18 and 19, can a pending permit application be denied during an emergency moratorium. If denied would this remove the "threat of irreparable harm" referred to in the paragraph? If a site is being designated, a moratorium would stop it from being demolished or altered. 2. How exactly is a historic district established. If an area is chosen, researched, and residents notified for a public hering, what happens if they balk. Is it ultimately the Historic Commission's call ... the City Council's ... or by a ballot? Earlier in the Public Hearing this evening, the procedure for establishing a District was described ... the procedure involves the property owners in the proposed district would be involved. Critically, for an Historic District to be established it requires that 50% of the property owners approve it by "ballot" on a petition and the City Council must formally approve an ordinance which sets forth the boundaries of the District. 3. Are all houses in a district automatically subject to the restrictions, or only those determined to have historic value? Any and all buildings in a district wuld be subject to restrictions but districts can be gerry-mandered if there is a problem. -3- Lansing Historic District Commission October 6, 1994 4. The ordinance seems to be restricted to the exterior appearance of the homes; does this affect the density of population that exists in many large old homes which have been converted into dupleses, and three and four families? State enabling legislation (and, therefore, this ordinance) limites us to exteriors of buildings or interior work only to the extent that it shows on the exterior. It does not give the Historic District Commission or ordinance any zoning controls. Unrelated to the ordinance, the Commission, like anyone else, can make recommendations to the appropriate Boards of the City on such matters as variances or concerns related to zoning. 5. Will the Historic Commission do a thorough job of identifying properties that should be preserved and create their own list of sites with property owners notified and tax rolls annotated so future owners can be notified? We will want to do additional investigation of areas or specific sites which shoudl be formally designated as Districts, but we will not do it alone: the entire process of study groups requires that private citizens and neighborhood groups are involved. It is a requirement of the ordinance that the City Clerk's job to see that information is recorded on deeds in the Register of Deed's Office so that owners and future owners will know that a property lies within an historic District. 6. Sections 1220.09, Demolition by Neglect, and Section 1220.10, Work without permit, are scary. Why would an owner want to be part of a Historic District if the Commission could have work done without the owners approval and charge the property owner for it through tax assessments or the courts? Demolition by neglect and work without a permit are powerful tools. Yes, at first look they can seem scary. However, at the core they are enforcement and safety issues which protect whole neighborhoods. It needs to be noted that such a strong matter must go through the City Council and not just theCommission. Will a program be developed to show off historical homes like other cities do? We would like to investigate the issue of home tours as is done in Grand Ledge. Additionally, we hope that the City will budget funds to pruchase signs to designate Historic Districts as every city in the State does. 8. Is there a financial incentive to belong to a Historic District? Yes and no. The Community Development funded Historic Preservation program is income contingent. While one gives up some personal control to the requirements of the ordinance, property owners are protected when other properties are properly preserved and maintained. MC Lansing. Historic District Commission October 6, 1994 S. Whitbeck pointed out that an important way to look at the Historic District ordinance is as an "insurance policy" for property owners. First, property values are maintained when other proeprties are not permitted to deteriorate. Second, property values are increased when repairs and improvements are done using historic preservation standards. Emly Horne, 110 W. Hodge, Lansing. Member of the Lansing Planning Board, appearing on their behalf. Indicated that on Tuesday, October 4, 1994, the Lnaisng Planning Board unanimously approved the proposed Historic District ordinance, 8 to 0. S. Whitbeck indicated that Linda Peckham (Historic Society) had indicated that she had intended to attend the Public Hearing and support the ordinance. V . OLD BUSINESS A. Historic District Ordinance S. Whitbeck made a motion that the Commission approve the Ordinance for final adoption and that we forward the ordinance and transcript/minutes of tonight's Public Hearing to the Lansing City Council for their passage of the ordinance. Motion was seconded by A. Garcynski. Motion was unanimously approved by a voice vote of 4 to 0. VI. ADJOURNMENT A. Garcynski made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8 :10 p.m. Motion was seconded by S. Whitbeck. Motion was unanimously approved by a voice vote of 4 to 0. ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 letters attached and incorporated to these minutes MIM TO: RE: Downtown Neighborhood Association P.O. Box 11164 Lansing, Michigan 4M Donna Wynant, Senior Planner Department of Planning and Neighborhood Development Joan Sheldon, 726 Seymour, Lansing 48906 Representing the Downtown Neighborhood Association (DNA) Proposed Revisions to the Historic District Ordinance The Downtown Neighborhood Association surveyed 10 members of the organi- zation who are actively involved in historic preservation, especially in the downtown residential area of Lansing. The ordinance was generally supported as proposed, but there are a few ques- tions that the DNA needs clarification on before final passage. Reference 1220.03(g), pages 18 and 19, can a pending permit applica- tion be denied during an emergency moratorium. If denied, would this remove the "threat of irreparable hardl" referred to in the paragraph How exactly is a historic district established. If an area is chosen, researched and residents notified for a public hearing, what happens if they balk. Is -it ultimately the Historic Commission's call ... the City Council's... or by a ballot. Are all houses in a district automatically subject to the restrictions, or only those determined to have historic value. The ordinance seems to be restricted to the exterior appearance of the homes; does this affect the density of population that exists in many large old homes which have been converted into duplexes, and three and four families. Will the Historic Commission do a thorough job of identifying properties that should be preserved and create their own list of sites i with property owners notified and tax -rolls annotated so future owners can be notified. Sections 1220.09 Demolition by Neglect and Section 1220.10 Work Without Permit are scary. Why would an owner want to be part of a Historic District if the Commission could have work done without the owners approval and charge the property owner for it through tax assesments or the courts. Will a program be developed to show off historical homes like other 7 cities do. i Is there a financial incentive to belong to a Historical District. • These are some of the questions that the DNA would like commented on, in writing, to distribute to board members and residents who participated in this Historic District Ordinance review process. 1 TO: Historic District Com ission FROM Sharon L. Kcllog RE: Public Hearing --revisions to Historic District Ordinance DATE: October 6, 1994 As the first chair of the Historic. District Commission, and an advocate of old house restoration, I'd like to commend you for the effort put forth to develop these revisions to our ordinance. I am also a member and former president of the Downtown Neighborhood Association, but my remarks reflect only my personal views on this subject. These proposed changes are essential if we are serious about preserving our housing stock, which is one of our city's assets. Aside from the ordinance revisions, I believe it is critical that the City departments responsible for code enforcement of rental properties and for regulation of historic districts coordinate efforts on exterior repairs of properties in historic districts. The Cherry Hill Historic District is an example of the problems that arise from no coordination. The Commission should also consider methods of identifying historic districts and for developing incentives for owners of property in historic districts. As a Realtor, I would also like to suggest a procedure where disclosure of property in historic districts shows up on title commitments. While these comments have been about issues unrelated to the new ordinance, I commend the Commission for making the enabling legislation as easy as possible to understand on the local level. As I understand the Commission's task, there wasn't discretion on what issues could or could not be included, but that the City ordinance must conform to the statute. Once in place, Lansing will finally be able to receive funds from the State. `Vest Ionia -Lansing, Mlehlgart 48933 Draft to Clerk 11/14/94 Approved 12/01/94 To Clerk 08/30/95 LANSING HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION November 3, 1994; 5:30 P.M. Department of Planning & Neighborhood Development 119 North Washington Square Annex; 2nd Floor Lansing, Michigan 48933 I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by A. Garcynski, acting chair, at 5:44 p.m. II. ROLL CALL A. Members r`— rs -. F . Blanck R . Busby A. Garcynski S. Whitbeck 4Fj co t'') B . Excused Absences < c _ t71 S. Sawyer -Burleson M. J. Wilson AZ) 0 C . City Staff D . Wynant D . Guests E . Horne C . Shull P . Scott D . Reedy III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA S. Whitbeck made a motion to approve the agenda as presented. Motion was seconded by F. Blanck and approved by a voice vote of 4 to 0. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Advertised Public Hearings None B . Members of the Audience Wishing to Address the Commission P. Scott addressed the Commission. He inquired whether the HDC had reviewed the 7-Block plan (Answer: No) . He also asked why there were 9 members on the Historic District Commission rather than 8. A. Garcynski answered that the enabling legislation allowed the commission 9 members. E. Horne spoke. She wanted the commission to know that the Ad Hoc Committee will be looking to HDC for preservation materials for the 7 Block area. S. Whitbeck requested that information be passed on to the Commission regarding 7-Block. She wants a letter of intent for the Historic District Co„emission, November 3, 1994 Page 2 Historic District Commission to become informed of any preservation interests. V . BUSINESS SESSION A. Approval of Minutes: 1. May 5, 1994: S. Whitbeck made a motion to approve the minutes of May 5, 1994, as amended (ie, a. Held in Otherwise Gallery, 1207 Turner Street, Lansing, Michigan, b . the abstention on page 4 was by S. Whitbeck, and c. page 3 needs numbering) . Motion seconded by F. Blanck. VOTE: yea nay ,yea nay Blanck X Garcynski X Busby X Whitbeck X Motion Approved by a vote of 4 to 0. 2. June 2, 1994: S. Whitbeck made a motion to approve the minutes of June 2, 1994; motion seconded by R. Busby. VOTE: yea nay yea nay Blanck X Garcynski X Busby X Whitbeck X Motion Approved by a vote of 4 to 0. 3. July 7, 1994: S. Whitbeck moved to approve the minutes of July 7, 1994. Motion was seconded by F. Blanck. VOTE: yea nay ,yea nay Blanck X Garcynski X Busby X Whitbeck X Motion Approved by a vote of 4 to 0. 4. August 18, 1994: A motion was made to table the approval of the minutes for August 18, 1994, to allow staff to check the file for a motion to clarify the position on 403 N . Sycamore. Motion seconded and approved unanimously by voice vote. 5. Sept. 8, 1994: S. Whitbeck moved to approve the minutes of September 8, 1994, as amended (add a paragraph to minutes on page 4 to reflect that Fred Sibel is not the owner, and anyone interested should know that they need an executed power of attorney before proceeding, and that dealing with him in any other manner could be a problem) . Motion seconded by R . Busby. VOTE: yea nay yea nay Blanck X Garcynski X Busby X Whitbeck X Motion Approved by a vote of 4 to 0. Historic District Commission, November 3, 1994 Paae 3 6. Oct. 13, 1994: S. Whitbeck made a motion to approve the minutes of October 13, 1994. Motion seconded by F. Blanck. VOTE: yea nay yea nay Blanck X Garcynski X Busby X Whitbeck X Motion Approved by a vote of 4 to 0. B . New Business: 1. Historic Preservation Program: Review of Proposed Brochure D . Wynant passed on information regarding the Historic Preservation Program process. This will be presented in brochure format at the next meeting. C . Old Business 1. 615 N. Capitol- follow up on district status D. Wynant will send letter to the Barrier Free Design Board regarding Lrry Andrick's request for a waiver for property at 615 N . Capitol. D . Committee Reports 1. Ordinance Subcommittee- Comments by Bureau of History A motion was made by S. Whitbeck to pass on comments by State of Michigan regarding the ordinance to J. Roberts to determine legal consequences of recommendations. Seconded by F. Blanck. VOTE: yea nay yea nay Blanck X Garcynski X Busby X Whitbeck X Motion Approved by a vote of 4 to 0. E. Other Communications D . Wynant informed the Commission that the Department of the Interior's Standards for Historic Preservation was forwarded on to the Building Safety staff members that attended the last Historic District meeting. VI. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6 : 40 p.m. Draft to Clerk 08/25/95 „ z Adopted 09/14/95 j § n To Clerk 09/20/95 1! hirvi !,, (� �LANSING HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Lr,;'J1i,"0 C; I Y CLERIi MINUTES December 1, 1994; 5:30 P.M. Department of Planning & Neighborhood Development 119 North Washington Square Annex; 2nd Floor Lansing, Michigan 48933 I. CALL TO ORDER A. Meeting called to order at 5 : 50 p.m. II. ROLL CALL A. Members S. Sawyer -Burleson A. Garcynski F . B lanck R . Busby B . Excused Absences S . Whitbeck C . City Staff D . Wynant D. Guests Diana Reedy E . Horne A quorum of 4 members was present to allow voting action to take place. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA A. Add to business section: Approval of final modifications to Historic District Ordinance. S . Sawyer -Burleson made a motion to approve the agenda as amended, seconded by T . Garcynski. Motion passed unanimously. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Advertised Public Hearings: None HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION, December 1, 1994 Page 2 B . Members of the Audience Wishing to Address the Commission: None V. BUSINESS SESSION A. Approval of Minutes: November 3, 1994 -- Under Old Business, the spelling of a name, page three, section C, #1, the letter A is missing from Larry. The minutes were approved as amended, unanimously, by a voice vote. B. Old Business: Historic Preservation Program Brochure Wynant gave an overview of the type of information to be included in the brochure. The Commission will be able to review the brochure once a draft has been completed. C . Committee Reports: Ordinance Subcommittee Jack Roberts from the City Attorney's Office briefed the Commission on the Bureau of History's comments of the revised ordinance as proposed. D . Final modifications to Historic District Ordinance A. Garcynski spoke on this. He stated that the State had recommended some modifications to the Ordinance which he (Garcynski) does not agree with, nor does Jack Roberts, City Attorney. Mr. Garcynski then went over the proposed ordinance with the Commission. Much discussion took place. E . Other Communications: None VI. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7 : 45 p.m.