Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992 Historic District Commission MinutesLANSING HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MINUTES March 5, 1992 0 I . CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 6: 21 p.m. by Chairman Alfred Eger in the 2nd Floor Conference Room located at 119 North Washington Square, Washington Square Annex. II . ROLL CALL Members Present: Members Absent: Staff Member Present: Guests: III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Alfred A. Eger Suzanne L . Sawyer -Burleson Fred Blanck Mark Bailen Wilbur Sherman William Whitbeck Brian Bridson William Acheson Marjorie Blair It was Moved by Sawyer -Burleson, Supported by Mark Bailen, and unanimously Carried to approve the agenda as outlined with the addition of the following item under New Business: C. 8. Sparrow Hospital Overpass IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Advertised Public Hearings - None B . Members of the Audience Wishing to Address the Commission - None Historic District Commission Minutes March 5, 1992 Page 2 V. BUSINESS SESSION: A. Approval of Minutes: It was Moved by Sawyer -Burleson, Seconded by Bridson, and unanimously Carried to approve the minutes of November 7, 1991, and December 12, 1991, as published. B. Old Business: 1. Work Program Following discussion, it was the consensus of Commission members to, at each consecutive meeting , focus one or two of the 1992 Work Program goals to determine the feasibility of accomplishing that particular goal in 1992. Commission members will target Downtown Design Standards at their meeting of 5/7/92. 2. Promotional Video Ms. Sawyer -Burleson presented an overview of the Commission' s plans to produce a promotional video. Estimates have been obtained and funding sources are being sought. The Commission wants to make this community know that the Historic District Commission exists. She reported that the Michigan Humanities Council will be sending her their 1992 grant application which is due September 1992. C. New Business: 1 . 1333-35 North Walnut (HPP-1-92) - Commission members reviewed slides and discussed restoration of 1333-35 North Walnut. Following discussion, it was Moved by Blanck , Supported by Sawyer -Burleson and unanimously Carried to grant up to $10,000 to restore the structure as proposed. Determinations made by Commission members are contained in a memorandum to Ron Stonehouse, Development Division Director, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes. Historic District Commission Minutes March 5, 1992 Page 3 2. 529 Cherry (HPP-2-92) - Commission members reviewed slides of r the structure at 529 Cherry. Following discussion, it was Moved by Blanck , Supported by Sawyer -Burleson, and unanimously Carried to grant up to $5,000 to restore the structure as proposed. Determinations made by Commission members are contained in a memorandum to Ron Stonehouse , Development Division Director, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes. 3. 216 East Hillsdale (Cherry Hill) - Preservation Activities - Commission members reviewed slides of the structure at 216 East Hillsdale. Mr. Acheson reported that a "Make Safe or Demolish" order exists on this structure and Planning Division staff are working to have the house restored. Specifications have been received showing stabilization procedures to keep the structure from further deterioration. City officials are trying to force the owner to preserve the house . 4. 601 West Shiawassee - Preservation Activities - The 600 block of Shiawassee Street, between Pine and Walnut has. been targeted by Lansing Reinvestment Corporation for restoration. The State of Michigan has determined that these houses are historically significant. The structure at 601 West Shiawassee, vacant for• approximately one year, is still in a "Make Safe or Demolish" condition. 5. Historic District Ordinance -Penalties for Non-compliance - Violating the "Make Safe" Ordinance carries minute penalties and City officials have indicated that the Historic District Commission should request stiffer penalties. Following discussion, it was the consensus of Commission members to contact other agencies in Michigan with Historic Districts to determine what their penalties and enforcement procedures are. This item will be discussed further at the April 9 meeting . 6. Downtown Design Standards - Signs - Bill Acheson informed Commission members that in the last six months, the Planning Division has instituted a new Sign Ordinance. This Ordinance did not include specific standards for historic buildings or districts. It might be a way for the Historic District Commission Historic District Commission Minutes March 5, 1992 Page 4 to begin work on Downtown Design Standards. A proposed Ordinance will be submitted to the Commission for review and recommendation. 7. 1992 Meeting Schedule - Following discussion it was the consensus of Commission members to adopt the 1992 meeting schedule, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes. 8. Sparrow Hospital Overpass - Bill Acheson informed Commission members that Sparrow Hospital's proposal to place a pedestrian overpass across Michigan Avenue, between the hospital and their annex, will be submitted to the Commission for their review and recommendation. Commission members were asked to drive by the site and think about design since the view of the Capitol down Michigan Avenue will be affected. 9. Brochures were distributed by Bill Acheson regarding two conferences. Commission members were asked to call Jeanette at the Planning Division if interested. D . Committee Reports: There were no committee reports . VII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was Moved by Sawyer -Burleson, Seconded by Blanck, and Carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 7:10 p.m. CITY of LANSING INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION TO: Ronald G. Stonehouse, Development Division Director FROM: William C. Acheson, Senior Planner, Planning Division Planning & Municipal Development Department DATE: March 16, 1992 SUBJECT: 1233-35 NORTH WALNUT (HPP-1-92) At a regularly scheduled meeting on March 5, 1992., the Historic District Commission reviewed an application to participate in the Historic Preservation Loan Program, for 1233-35 North Walnut (HPP- 1-92). This application was submitted by the Franklin Street Community Housing Cooperative. It was found that this house is situated within an area for which the Michigan Bureau of History proposes a Historic District. This particular structure is in a strategic location of influence as a contributing structure within the possible Historic District. For these reasons,. the Historic District Commission found the structure worthy to be included in the Historic Preservation Loan Program. Also, because the structure is on a corner lot, the Historic District Commission recommends inclusion for an amount not to exceed $10,000 for the following work: 1) Foundation repair and tuck -pointing. 2) Remove and restore front porch and steps as original. Remove and replace rear porch with 4' X 5' deck and steps which will be compatible with the architecture of the building. Drawings detailing porch and step configuration must be approved prior to construction. 3 ) Repair siding and trim, sand, caulk and paint with period colors to be approved in accordance with Historic District Commission requirements. 4) Repair or replace windows as necessary, utilizing aluminum storms provided the storms have an enameled finish rather than a raw aluminum finish. Color should match sash or trim colors of house. New windows must be as original. 5) Repair or replace doors as necessary, utilizing aluminum storm doors with enameled rather than raw aluminum finish. Pseudo historic styles, such as colonial or cross bucks, should not be used. Memorandum to Ronald G. Stonehouse March 16, 1992 Page 2 6) Remove attached garage and repair of siding. 7) Repair of chimney, including tuck -pointing. 8) Replacement of gutters with those that will blend with the style of the structure and will not obscure original detail. 9) Roof repair and roof vents as necessary. Color and style of roofing, and other material, to be compatible with original architecture of period. The applicant has been advised that proper invoices and other documentation for costs will be required prior to disbursement of funds. The applicant has also been advised that detailed scale elevations of the building showing affected elements must be submitted. These, in conjunction with specifications for paint and other details, must be sufficient to provide a guide for the proposed work. If you have any questions, please contact me. WCA/jar cc: Alan E. Tubbs James N. Foulds Historic District Commission Members Franklin Street Community Housing Cooperative Royce Pugh TO: FROM: DATE: CITY of LANSING INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION Ronald G. Stonehouse, Development Division Director William C. Acheson, Senior Planner, Planning Division Planning &vMunicipal Development Department UiLl"S' March 16, 1992 SUBJECT: 529 CHERRY STREET (HPP-2-92) At a regularly scheduled meeting on March 5, 1992, the Historic District Commission reviewed an application to participate in the Historic Preservation Loan Program, for 529 Cherry Street (HPP-2- 92). This application was submitted by Mr. Stephen Early. This property is located in the Cherry Hill Historic District. The house was constructed in 1906 and is a Folk Queen Anne structure. It is classified as having National Register potential. For those reasons, the Historic District Commission found the structure to merit inclusion in the Preservation Loan Program for an amount not to exceed $5,000 for the following work: 17 Repair or replacement duplicate original as operation and style. of windows as necessary to closely as possible in size, 2) Repair or replacement of doors as original in style, size, and operation. 3) Repair and painting of original clapboard siding, including details (such as cornices, moldings, etc.). Paint colors must be appropriate to the style and period of the structure. 4) Repair of porches to duplicate original style and dimension. This includes the replacement of non -period elements,as possible. 5) Repair or replacement of the roof with style and color to be compatible with briginal architecture and period. The applicant has been advised that proper invoices and other documentation for costs will be required prior to disbursement of funds. The applicant has also been advised that detailed scale elevations showing affected elements of the subject building must be submitted. These, in conjunction with specifications for paint and Memorandum to Ronald G. Stonehouse March 17, 1992 Page 2 other details, must be sufficient to provide a guide for the proposed work. The applicant has indicated that, if possibe, he wishes to change the lower level of the buidling for use as office space, leaving the upper level for residential use. The structure is now used as a single-family home. He has been advised that, if the office use is installed, Davis -Bacon wage guidelines must be observed for work done. The applicant must contact the Human Relations Department (483-4088) prior to beginning work to assure Davis -Bacon compliance. If you have any questions, please contact me. WCA/jar cc: Alan E. Tubbs James N. Foulds Historic District Commission Members Franklin Street Community Housing Cooperative Royce Pugh NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETINGS NAME OF BODY Historic District Commission TELEPHONE NUMBER 483-4066 ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL OFFICE 119 North Washington Square REGULAR MEETING DATES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 92 Date Time Place ---------------------- ------------------- -------------------------------------- Planning & Municipal Development April 9, 1992 5:30 p.m. Conference Room Planning & Municipal Development May 7, 1992 5:30 p.m. Conference Room Planning & I Municipal Development June 4, 1992 5:30 p.m. Conference Room Planning & Municipal Development September 10, 1992 5:30 p.m. Conference Room Planning & Municipal Development October 1, 1992 5:30 p.m. Conference Room Planning & Municipal Development November 5, 1992 5:30 p.m. Conference Room Planning & Municipal Development December 3, 1992 5:30 p.m.. Conference Room POSTED AT: City Clerk's Office Lobby bulletin Board^ Reception Area Principal Office City Council Office — Date Posted 3-24-92 LANSING HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MINUTES May 7, 1992 I . CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 5:40 p.m. by Chairman Alfred Eger in the 2nd Floor Conference Room located at 119 North Washington Square, Washington Square Annex. II . ROLL CALL Members Present: Members Absent: Staff Member Present: Guests: III . APPROVAL OF AGENDA Alfred A. Eger Mark Bailen Fred Blanck Wilbur Sherman William Whitbeck Suzanne L . Sawyer -Burleson William Acheson None It was Moved by Blanck , Seconded by Bailen , and unanimously Carried to approve the agenda as outlined. IV. PUBLIC HEARING A. Advertised Public Hearings: None B . Members of the Audience Wishing to Address the Commission - None Car Lansing Historic District Commission Minutes May 7, 1992 Page 2 V. BUSINESS SESSION: a. Approval of Minutes: It was Moved by Sherman, Seconded by Bailen, and unanimously Carried to approve the minutes of April 16, 1992, as published. b. Old Business: 1 . Promotional Video - Suzanne Sawyer Burleson has reviewed and compared all funding possibilities and the most viable solution is to submit an application to the Michigan Humanities Council with a preliminary report deadline an October 5, 1992. December 15, 1992 is the deadline to submit the full application with funding appropriated in 1993. 2. 216 East Hillsdale -Update - Bill Acheson informed Commission members that Mr. Davidson, the owner of 216 East Hillsdale (in the Cherry Hill Historic District) violated a city ordinance by repairing this structure without a building permit. A meeting on June 8 has been scheduled to explore ways and means to resolve this situation so repair work can begin on the building. A public hearing will be scheduled after a building permit is received. A "make safe or demolish" order has been issued and staff is in favor of "make safe" rather than demolition of this structure because it is in the historic district. The city attorney supports our decision. This may be the first test of our guidelines. C. New Business: 1 . 529 Cherry; (HPP-5-92) - Commission members reviewed slides of the structure at 529 Cherry. Following discussion, it was Moved by Bailen , Supported by Blanck , and unanimously Carried to grant up to $5,000 to restore the structure as proposed. Determinations made by Commission members are contained in a memorandum to Ron Stonehouse , Development Division Director, a copy of which is attached to and made a '. part of these minutes. Lansing Historic District Commission Minutes May 7, 1992 Page 3 2. 601 West Shiawassee; (HPP-6-92) - Commission members reviewed slides of the structure at 601 West Shiawassee. Following discussion, it was Moved by Bailen, Supported by Blanck, and unanimously Carried to grant up to $10,000 to restore the structure as proposed. Determinations made by Commission members are contained in a memorandum to Ron Stonehouse, Development Division Director, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes. 3. 605 West Shiawassee; (HPP-7-92) - Commission members reviewed slides of the structure at 605 West Shiawassee. Following discussion, it was Moved by Sherman, Supported by Bailen, and unanimously Carried to grant up to $5,000 to restore the structure as proposed. Determinations made by Commission members are contained in a memorandum to Ron Stonehouse, Development Division Director, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes. 4. 609 West Shiawassee; (HPP-8-92) - Commission members reviewed slides of the structure at 609 West Shiawassee. Following discussion, it was Moved by Blanck , Supported by Bailen, and unanimously Carried to grant up to $5,000 to restore the structure as proposed. Determinations made by Commission members are contained in a memorandum to Ron Stonehouse, Development Division Director, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes. r 5. 613 West Shiawassee; (HPP-9-92) - Commission members reviewed slides of the structure at 613 West Shiawassee. Following discussion, it was Moved by Blanck , Supported by Bailen, and unanimously Carried to grant up to $5,000 to restore the structure as proposed. Determinations made by Commission members are contained in a memorandum to Ron Stonehouse, Development Division Director, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes. 6. 621 West Shiawassee; (HPP-10-92) - Commission members reviewed slides of the structure at 621 West Shiawassee. Following discussion, it was Moved by Sherman, Supported by Bailen, and unanimously Carried to grant up to $5,000.to Lansing Historic District Commission Minutes May 7, 1992 Page 4 M restore the structure as proposed. Determinations made by Commission members are contained in a memorandum to Ron Stonehouse, Development Division Director, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes. VI. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was Moved by Bailen, Seconded by Sherman, and Carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 6:57 p.m. TO: FROM: CITY of LANSING INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION Ronald G. Stonehouse, Development Division Director William C. Acheson, Senior Planner, Planning Division(,(-�� Planning & Municipal Development Department DATE: May 11, 1992 SUBJECT: 529 CHERRY STREET (HPP-5-92) At a regularly scheduled meeting on May 7, 1992, the Historic District Commission reviewed an application to participate in the Historic Preservation Loan Program, for 529 Cherry Street (HPP-5- 92). This application was submitted by Mr. W. Paul Weigman. This is a new application for property that was approved as HPP-2-92 on March 5, 1992. This property is located in the Cherry Hill Historic District. The house was constructed in 1906 and is a Folk Queen Anne structure. It is classified as having National Register potential. For those reasons, the Historic District Commission found the structure to merit inclusion in the Preservation Loan Program for an amount not to exceed $5,000 for the following work: 1) Repair or replacement duplicate original as operation and style. of windows as necessary to closely as possible in size, 2) Repair or replacement of doors as original in style, size, and operation. 3) Repair and painting of original clapboard siding, including details (such as cornices, moldings, etc.). Paint colors must be appropriate to the style and period of the structure and approved by staff. 4) Repair of porches to duplicate original style and dimension. This includes the replacement of non -period elements as possible. 5) Repair or replacement of the roof with style and color to be compatible with original architecture and period. The applicant has been advised that proper invoices and other documentation for costs will be required prior to disbursement of funds. Memorandum to Ronald G. Stonehouse HPP-5-92 May 11, 1992 Page 2 The applicant has also been advised that detailed scale elevations showing affected elements of the subject building must be submitted. These, in conjunction with specifications for paint and other details, must be sufficient to provide a guide for the proposed work. The applicant has indicated that he will convert the home for two- family use. A certificate of approval was issued on April 16, 1992, by the Commission for the work proposed. If you have any questions, please contact me. WCA/jar cc: Alan E. Tubbs James N. Foulds Historic District Commission Members W. Paul Wiegman Royce Pugh -ice 7 S CITY Of LANSING INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION TO: FROM: DATE: Ronald G. Stonehouse, Development Division Director William C. Acheson, Senior Planner, Planning Division ll(f(_/ Planning & Municipal Development Department May 11, 1992 SUBJECT: 601 West Shiawassee (HPP-6-92) ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------ At a regularly scheduled meeting on May 7, 1992, the Historic District Commission reviewed an application to participate in the Historic Preservation Loan Program, for 601 West Shiawassee (HPP-6- 92). This application was submitted by the Lansing Reinvestment Corporation. This is one of seven structures in the 600 block of West Shiawassee that will be restored. Six will be done by the Lansing Reinvestment Corporation and one by the Lansing Housing Coalition. All structures, except for 621 West Shiawassee, will be converted for single-family use. The structure at 621 will be a two -unit, converted from three units. In all, five structures are presently proposed for inclusion in the Historic Preservation Program: 601, 605, 609, 613 and 621 West Shiawassee. The others, 617 and 629 West Shiawassee will not utilize Preservation funds, although the work done will meet the preservation fund standards. HPP-6-92, 601 West Shiawassee, was recommended for inclusion in the Historic Preservation Loan Program for an amount not to exceed $10,000 for the following work: 1) Cleaning, repairing and tuck -pointing exterior brick. 2) Cleaning and repairing exterior trim and wood surfaces. 3) Painting exterior brick, wood surfaces and trim in an appropriate multiple color scheme for the style and period of the structure as determined by the Preservation Planner. 4) Repair or replacement of windows, doors, and storms as necessary to duplicate original as closely as possible in size, operation and style. Memorandum to Ronald G. Stonehouse HPP-6-92 May 11, 1992 Page 2 5) Repairing or replacing of porch and steps to duplicate original style and dimension. This includes the replacement of.non-period elements as possible. 6) Cleaning, repairing and tuck -pointing the chimney to original configuration as closely as possible. 7) Cleaning, repairing and tuck -pointing of the foundation. 8) Removing asphalt areas in front yard areas and replacing those areas with grass. The applicant is advised that three estimates of project costs must be submitted. Development Division approval prior to work commencing must be received. In addition, the applicant is advised that scale elevations of the building, as necessary to show those elements of the building that are affected, must be submitted. These, in conjunction with specifications for paint and other detail, should be sufficient to provide a guide for the proposed work. If you have any questions, please contact me. WCA/jar cc: Alan E. Tubbs James N. Foulds Historic District Royce Pugh Commission Members Dale Goodrich, Lansing Reinvestment Corporation CITY of LANSING INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION c TO: Ronald G. Stonehouse, Development Division Director FROM: William C. Acheson, Senior Planner, Planning Division" Planning & Municipal Development Department DATE: May 11, 1992 SUBJECT: 605 West Shiawassee (HPP-7-92) At a regularly scheduled meeting on May 7, 1992, the Historic District Commission reviewed an application to participate in the Historic Preservation Loan Program for 605 West Shiawassee (HPP-7- 92). This application was submitted by the Lansing Reinvestment Corporation. This is one of seven structures in the 600 block of West Shiawassee that will be restored. Six will be done by the Lansing Reinvestment Corporation and one by the Lansing Housing Coalition. All structures, except for 621 West Shiawassee, will be converted for single-family use. The structure at 621 will be a two -unit, converted from three units. In all, five structures are presently proposed for inclusion in the Historic Preservation Program: 601, 605, 609, 613 and 621 West Shiawassee. The others, 617 and 629 West Shiawassee will not utilize Preservation funds, although the work done will meet the preservation fund standards. HPP-7-92, 605 West Shiawassee, was recommended for inclusion in the Historic Preservation Loan Program for an amount not to exceed $5,000 for the following work: 1) Cleaning, repairing and tuck -pointing exterior brick. 2) Cleaning and repairing exterior trim and wood surfaces. 3) Painting exterior brick, wood surfaces and trim in an appropriate multiple color scheme for the style and period of the structure to enhance architectural details as determined by the Preservation Planner. This includes treatment of the non -period shed roof, over the second empire style roof on the east side of the building, to hide or blend it into the architecture of the building. Also, the shutters on the front of the house, if non - period, should be removed. Memorandum to Ronald G. Stonehouse HPP-7-92 May 11, 1992 Page 2 4) Repair or replacement of windows, doors, and storms as necessary -to duplicate original as closely as possible in size, operation and style. S) Repairing or replacing of porch and steps to duplicate original style and dimension. This includes the replacement of non -period elements as possible. 6) Removal of the enclosed porch on the west side of the structure and re -bricking the opening to match the exterior brick. 7) Constructing an interior stairway from the first to second floor. 8) Cleaning, repairing and tuck -pointing the chimney to original configuration as closely as possible. 9) Cleaning, repairing and tuck -pointing of the foundation. This includes the removal of trees that have grown along the foundation causing damage. 10) Removing asphalt areas in front yard areas and replacing those areas with grass. The applicant is advised that three estimates of project costs must be submitted. Development Division approval prior to work commencing must be received. In addition, the applicant is advised that scale elevations of the building, as necessary to show those elements of the building that are affected, must be submitted. These, in conjunction with .specifications for paint and other detail, should be sufficient to provide a guide for the proposed work. If you have any questions, please contact me. WCA/jar cc: Alan E. Tubbs James N. Foulds Historic District Royce Pugh Commission Members Dale Goodrich, Lansing Reinvestment Corporation �'A °� s CITY of LANSING INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION TO: FROM: Ronald G. Stonehouse, Development Division Director William C. Acheson, Senior Planner, Planning Division Planning & Municipal Development Department DATE: May 11, 1992 SUBJECT: 609 West Shiawassee (HPP-8-92) At a regularly scheduled meeting on May 7, 1992, the Historic District Commission reviewed an application to participate in the Historic Preservation Loan Program, for 609 West Shiawassee (HPP-8- 92). This application was submitted by the Lansing Reinvestment Corporation. This is one of seven structures in the 600 block of West Shiawassee that will be restored. Six will be done by the Lansing Reinvestment Corporation and one by the Lansing Housing Coalition. All structures, except for 621 West Shiawassee, will be converted for single-family use. The structure at 621 will be a two -unit, converted from three units. In all, five structures are presently proposed for inclusion in the Historic Preservation Program: 601, 605, 609, 613 and 621 West Shiawassee. The others, 617 and 629 West Shiawassee will not utilize Preservation funds, although the work done will meet the preservation fund standards. HPP-8-92, 609 West Shiawassee, was recommended for inclusion in the Historic Preservation Loan Program for an amount not to exceed $5,000 for the following work: 1) Cleaning, repairing and tuck -pointing exterior brick. 2) Cleaning and repairing exterior trim and wood surfaces. 3) Painting exterior brick, wood surfaces and trim in an appropriate multiple color scheme for the style and period of the structure as determined by the Preservation Planner. 4) Repair or replacement of windows, doors, and storms as necessary to duplicate original as closely as possible in size, operation and style. Memorandum to Ronald G. Stonehouse HPP-8-92 May 11, 1992 Page 2 5) Repairing or replacing of porch and steps to duplicate original style and dimension. This includes the replacement of non -period elements as possible. 6) Cleaning, repairing and tuck -pointing the chimney to original configuration as closely as possible. 7) Cleaning, repairing and tuck -pointing of the foundation. 8) Removing asphalt areas in front yard areas and replacing those areas with grass. 9) Removing the exterior entrance and stairway on the east side of the building. This includes repair of the exterior surfaces as necessary. The applicant is advised that three estimates of project costs must be submitted. Development Division approval prior to work commencing must be received. In addition, the applicant is advised that scale elevations of the building, as necessary to show those elements of the building that are affected, must be submitted. These, in conjunction with specifications for paint and other detail, should be sufficient to provide a guide for the proposed work. If you have any questions, please contact me. WCA/jar cc: Alan E. Tubbs James N. Foulds Historic District Commission Members Royce Pugh Dale Goodrich, Lansing Reinvestment Corporation TO: FROM: CITY of LANSING INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION Ronald G. Stonehouse, Development Division Director William C. Acheson, Senior Planner, Planning Division krt� Planning & Municipal Development Department DATE: May 11, 1992 SUBJECT: 613 West Shiawassee (HPP-9-92) At a regularly scheduled meeting on May 7, 1992, the Historic District Commission reviewed an application to participate in the Historic Preservation Loan Program, for 613 West Shiawassee (HPP-9- 92). This application was submitted by the Lansing Reinvestment Corporation. This is one of seven structures in the 600 block of West Shiawassee that will be restored. Six will be done by the Lansing Reinvestment Corporation and one by the Lansing Housing Coalition. All structures, except for 621 West Shiawassee, will be converted for single-family use. The structure at 621 will be a two -unit, converted from three units. In all, five structures are presently proposed for inclusion in the Historic Preservation Program: 601, 605, 609, 613 and 621 West Shiawassee. The others, 617 and 629 West Shiawassee will not utilize Preservation funds, although the work done will meet the preservation fund standards. HPP-9-92, 613 West Shiawassee, was recommended for inclusion in the Historic Preservation Loan Program for an amount not to exceed $5,000 for the following work: 1) Cleaning, repairing and tuck -pointing exterior brick. 2) Cleaning and repairing exterior trim and wood surfaces. 3) Painting exterior brick, wood surfaces and trim in an appropriate multiple color scheme for the style and period of the structure as determined by the Preservation Planner. 4) Repair or replacement of windows, doors, and storms as necessary to duplicate original as closely as possible in size, operation and style. Memorandum to Ronald G. Stonehouse HPP-9-92 May 11, 1992 Page 2 5) Repairing or replacing of porch and steps to duplicate original style and dimension. This includes the replacement of non -period elements as possible. 6) Cleaning, repairing and tuck -pointing the chimney to original configuration as closely as possible. 7) Cleaning, repairing and tuck -pointing of the foundation. 8) Removing asphalt areas in front yard areas and replacing those areas with grass. 9) Removing rear stairway to second story and rebuilding the upper and lower deck as needed and to blend with the period and architecture of the building. The applicant is advised that three estimates of project costs must be submitted. Development Division approval prior to work commencing must be received. In addition, the applicant is advised that scale elevations of the building, as necessary to show those elements of the building that are affected, must be submitted. These, in conjunction with specifications for paint and other detail, should be sufficient to provide a guide for the proposed work. If you have any questions, please contact me. WCA/jar cc: Alan E. Tubbs James N. Foulds Historic District Commission Members Royce Pugh Dale Goodrich, Lansing Reinvestment Corporation CITY of LANSING INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION TO: Ronald G. Stonehouse, Development Division Director FROM: William C. Acheson, Senior Planner, Planning Division k_,� Planning & Municipal Development Department DATE: May 11, 1992 SUBJECT: 621 West Shiawassee (HPP-10-92) At a regularly scheduled meeting on May 7, 1992, the Historic District Commission reviewed an application to participate in the Historic Preservation Loan Program, for 621 West Shiawassee (HPP- 10-92). This application was submitted by the Lansing Reinvestment Corporation. This is one of seven structures in the 600 block of West Shiawassee that will be restored. Six will be done by the Lansing Reinvestment Corporation and one by the Lansing Housing Coalition. All structures, except for 621 West Shiawassee, will be converted for single-family use. The structure at 621 will be a two -unit, converted from three units. In all, five structures are presently proposed for inclusion in the Historic Preservation Program: 601, 605, 609, 613 and 621 West Shiawassee. The others, 617 and 629 West Shiawassee will not utilize Preservation funds, although the work done will meet the preservation fund standards. HPP-10-923 621 West Shiawassee, was recommended for inclusion in the Historic Preservation Loan Program for an amount not to exceed $5,000 for the following work: 1) Cleaning, repairing and tuck -pointing exterior brick. 2) Cleaning and repairing exterior trim and wood surfaces. 3) Painting exterior brick, wood surfaces and trim in an appropriate multiple color scheme for the style and period of the structure as determined by the Preservation Planner. 4) Repair or replacement of windows, doors, and storms as necessary to duplicate original as closely as possible in size, operation and style. Memorandum to Ronald G. Stonehouse May 11, 1992 Page 2 HPP-10-92 5) Repairing or replacing of porch and steps to duplicate original style and dimension. This includes the replacement of non -period elements,as possible. 6) Cleaning, repairing and tuck -pointing the chimney to original configuration as closely as possible. 7) Cleaning, repairing and tuck -pointing of the foundation. 8) Removing asphalt areas in front yard areas and replacing those areas with grass. 9) Repair upper and lower rear stairways to blend with the period architecture of the building as possible. The applicant is advised that three estimates of project costs must be submitted. Development Division approval prior to work commencing must be received. In addition, the applicant is advised that scale elevations of the building, as necessary to show those elements of the building that are affected, must be submitted. These, in conjunction with specifications for paint and other detail, should be sufficient to provide a guide for the proposed work. If you have any questions, please contact me. WCA/jar cc: Alan E. Tubbs James N. Foulds Historic District Commission Members Royce Pugh Dale Goodrich, Lansing Reinvestment Corporation LANSING HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MINUTES April 16, 1992 I . CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 5:47 p.m. by Chairman Alfred Eger in the 2nd Floor Conference Room located at 119 North Washington Square, Washington Square Annex. II . ROLL CALL Members Present: Members Absent: Staff Member Present: Guests: III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Alfred A. Eger Suzanne L . Sawyer -Burleson Fred Blanck Wilbur Sherman William Whitbeck Brian Bridson Mark Bailen, Excused William Acheson None It was Moved by Blanck, Seconded by Sawyer -Burleson, and unanimously Carried to approve the agenda with the following addition under New Business. C . 2. HPP-4-92 93 9 WU ? P(' Zs� I '_' I Lansing Historic District Commission Minutes April 16, 1992 Page 2 IV. PUBLIC HEARING A. Advertised Public Hearings: HDP-1-92, 529 Cherry Street Chairman Eger convened the public hearing with an opening statement that the reason for the public hearing was for consideration of a building permit which will be submitted by property owner, Mr. Stephen Early. Mr. Early will submit a permit application for 529 Cherry Street, which is located in the Cherry Hill Historic District. City Ordinance requires the Historic District Commission to hold a public hearing for review of permits in a Historic District . Mr. Early' s permit application is for repair/reconstruction of the front and rear porches; painting the exterior; repair/replacement of windows and doors; re -roofing the structure; the construction of a stairway on the rear of the structure to the second floor; as well as other work which might be necessary. It's possible the structure will be used for two one -bedroom apartments. This is a change from the original plan to locate an office on the first floor. Copies of the Staff Report were made available to attendees for their review and are attached to and made a part of these minutes. Bill Acheson made a slide presentation and reviewed the history of the property . B . Members of the Audience Wishing to Address the Commission - The property owner, MR. STEPHEN EARLY, of 1836 North College Road, Mason, Michigan, described his plans for restoration of the structure. In addition, W. Paul Weigman and Sherri Weigman, Mr. Early's partners in the project, gave details as necessary. Following discussion, it was Moved by Sawyer -Burleson, Seconded by Blanck and unanimously Carried that the Commission approve the building permit application for the restoration of the exterior structure at 529 Cherry Street, subject to Commission review and approval of final plans. These plans will include the restoration of all period elements, including the porches, the provision of an egress in the rear with the stairway angled to the rear of the property so as not to be visible from the street. A copy of the Certificate of Approval is attached to and made a part of these minutes. Lansing Historic District Commission Minutes April 16, 1992 Page 3 V. BUSINESS SESSION: a. Approval of Minutes: It was Moved by Sawyer -Burleson, Seconded by Blanck , and unanimously Carried to approve the minutes of March 5, 1992, as published. b. Old Business: 1 . Promotional Video - Procedures to obtain a media grant from the Michigan Humanities Council were discussed. It was thought that the October 15 draft proposal deadline was most realistic. Ms. Sawyer -Burleson had obtained an application packet which she gave to staff. 2. Historic District Ordinance -Penalties for Noncompliance - Following discussion, it was the consensus of Commission members to research penalties for noncompliance further and discuss them at the next meeting of the Commission. Bob Christensen, of the Michigan Historical Bureau of History, will be contacted to determine if he has copies of other cities' procedures. Mr. Acheson had talked to Mr. Christensen, and he indicated that he did not know from memory of any other ordinances that have more severe penalties than Lansing's ($500 fine and/or 90 days in jail) . 3. Downtown Design Standards -Signs - Following discussion, it was the consensus of Commission members to become involved in reviewing the Ordinance related to historical signs. Commission members will be kept up-to-date with further developments. c. New Business: 1 . 716 North Walnut; (HPP-3-92) - Commission members reviewed slides of the structure at 716 North Walnut. Following discussion, it was Moved by Blanck, Supported by Sherman, and unanimously Carried to grant up to $10,000 to restore the structure and garage as proposed. Determinations made by Lansing Historic District Commission Minutes April 16, 1992 Page 4 z Commission members are contained in a memorandum to Ron Stonehouse, Development Division Director, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes. 2. 1002 Ionia; (HPP-4-92) - Commission members reviewed slides of the structure at 1002 Ionia. Following discussion, it was Moved by Blanck , Supported by Sawyer -Burleson, and unanimously Carried to grant up to $5,000 to restore the structure as proposed. Determinations made by Commission members are contained in a memorandum to Ron Stonehouse , Development Division Director, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes. 3. Sparrow Hospital Overpass Suggestions - Several members of the Commission indicated that an overpass would not be acceptable because it would block the view of the Capitol from Michigan Avenue unless such an overpass were to be higher than three stories . An underground access would be most acceptable. VI. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was Moved by Sawyer -Burleson, Seconded by Sherman, and Carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 7:29 p.m. CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL HISTORIC BUILDING STE Vi�e-N EAZQ/ Applicant 5 -'7_5 L 4C )Z y, ST1Z�'�T Location Construction Alteration Repair P ONZ, E (mr,- 2,-Jo fcoba- SI v;#-J(r , (2A,,;*l w1 n.nrws x� 'TU�q {6 a-CA4 LK o2i f n L . Moving Demolition 1:1Sign The Historic District Commission, at a public hearing held NP12). L I � ) 19 9 2 after ten days wri tten noti ce to the appl i cant, has approved'the application for permit submitted by the applicant for work to be performed at 529 C—hE-KM which structure is located within a Historic District. This approval was based upon the preservation standards and guidelines contained in the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and the consideration of the tasks contained in Section 1220.05 of Ordi n.ance 665. �,���;, ti� .�nn�, ��,1 �-T7,r.F Chairmar(Historic Dist/ct Commission Members of the Board voting approval: HDP-1-92 529 Cherry Street HISTORIC DISTRICT REVIEW GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: Mr. Stephen Early 1836 North College Road Mason, Michigan STATUS OF APPLICANT: Property Owner REQUESTED ACTION: Building Permit Approval by Historic District Commission. PURPOSE: To allow the repair/reconstruction of the porches, paint, and other general exterior and interior repair. EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant two -unit. ZONING: "D-1" Professional Office District LOCATION: 529 Cherry Street ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: Folk Queen Anne HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE: The State History Division indicates that this structure has National Historic Register potential. SURROUNDING LAND USE: Two-family Residential One -family Residential/Office One -family Residential One -family Residential SURROUNDING ZONING: "D-1" Professional Office "D-1" Professional Office "D-1" Professional Office "D-1" Professional Office CASE HISTORY: Constructed 1906. DEVELOPER'S PROPOSAL: SPECIFIC INFORMATION To repair/reconstruct front and rear porches; paint exterior; repair/replace windows and doors; re -roof structure; -:as well as other work which might be necessary. If possible, the use of the structure will be changed for office on the ground floor and living area on the second floor. Historic District Review HDP-1-92 529 Cherry Street Page 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the applicant be allowed to restore the exterior as original as documented by Lansing Public Library photographic data. This includes porches, roof, windows, doors, and paint. CITY of LANSING INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION #_' f V!W r- t TO: Ronald G. Stonehouse, Development Division Director FROM: William C. Acheson, Senior Planner, Planning Division Planning & Municipal Development Department DATE: April 27, 1992 SUBJECT: 716 NORTH WALNUT, (HPP-3-92) At a meeting held April 16, 1992, the Historic District Commission reviewed an application to participate in the Historic Preservation Loan Program, by Ms. Lucy L. Esmay for 716 North Walnut (HPP-3-92). The Commission found that the main building and garage are worthy to be included in the loan program for an amount not to exceed $10,000 for the following work: 1. Reroofing both house and garage with material with texture and color complementary to the architecture and period of the structures. This includes stripping of old shingles, disposing of scrap, and structural repairs as necessary. 2. Repair/restoration of front porch, porch railing, porch steps and porch skirt as original. 3. Scraping, repair of siding and painting the house and garage. Paint will be a three or four color scheme to be approved by staff to highlight architectural details. 4. Foundation repair and tuck -pointing as necessary. This includes repairs to the driveway area next to the house to protect the foundation. �. Repair of the lower window on the south side of the house. This appears to have been where a bay window was located. The replacement window needs to be trimmed tp match the rest of the house trim or perhaps a shallow bow window with appropriate trim could be placed. 6. There is a portable air-conditioning unit in the southern most window on the upper floor of the front (west side) of the house. This unit is to be removed and the window repaired as necessary to original. Memorandum to Ronald G. Stonehouse April 27, 1992 Page 2 HPP-3-92 The applicant is advised that three estimates of project costs must be submitted. Development Division approval prior to work commencing must bevreceived. 11 In addition, the applicant is advised that scale elevations of the building, as necessary to show those elements of the building that are affected, must be submitted. These, in conjunction with specifications for paint and other detail, should be sufficient to provide a guide for proposed work. If you should have any questions, please contact me. WCA/jar cc: Alan E. Tubbs James N. Foulds Historic District Commission Members Royce Pugh Lucy L. Esmay TO: FROM: DATE: CITY of LANSING INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION Ronald G. Stonehouse, Development Division Director William C. Acheson, Senior Planner, Planning Division Planning & Municipal Development Department April 27, 1992 SUBJECT: 1002 IONIA (CARRIAGE HOUSE) (HPP-4-92) On April 16, 1992, the Historic District Commission reviewed an application to participate in the Historic Preservation Loan Program, by Dennis C. Cullinan for a carriage house located at 1002 Ionia (HPP-4-92). The Commission found the carriage house structure, which is located at the rear of the lot at 1002 Ionia, is worthy to be included in the loan program for an amount not to exceed $5,000. This is one of the few carriage houses Left in the city. The following work was approved: 1. Place new concrete footings and floor under the building. This will require the lifting of the building and its placement back on the new foundation. The building shall remain at original elevation and new footings disguised to appear original or not be visible. 2. Repair roof structure and replace roofing with material that has a texture and appearance of the original roofing which appears to have been shake shingle. 3. Repair and replace wood clapboards as necessary. A11 replacement material must be of the same dimensions and texture of original. 4. Repair windows and doors as original. 5. Exterior painting in colors and of a scheme which complements the style and architecture of the building. 6. Staging and refuse removal for all, work stages outlined above. The applicant has been advised that three estimates of project costs must be submitted and Development Division approval must be received.prior to work commencing. In addition, the applicant has been advised that scale elevations Memorandum to Ronald G. Stonehouse HPP-4-92 April 27, 1992 Page 2 of. the building, as necessary to show those elements of the building that are affected, must be submitted. These drawings, aloimg with specifications for paint and other detail, should be sufficient to provide a guide for proposed work. I£ you have any questions, please contact me. WCA/jar cc: Alan E. Tubbs James N. Foulds Historic District Commission Members Royce Pugh Dennis C. Cullinan LANS I NG HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MINUTES June 4, 1992 I . CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 5:58 p.m. by Chairman Alfred Eger in the 2nd Floor Conference Room located at 119 North Washington Square, Washington Square Annex. 1 1 . ROLL CALL Members Present: Members Absent: Staff Member Present: Guests: I I I . APPROVAL OF AGENDA v Alfred A. Eger Mark Bai len c' Fred Blanck Wilbur Sherman William Whitbeck Suzanne L. Sawyer -Burleson, Excuse&v = . Wi I I iam Acheson d Paul Scott It was Moved by Blanck, Seconded by Bailer, and unanimously Carried to approve the agenda as outlined with the following additions under New Business: C . 1 . HPP-1 1-92; 415 North Pine 2. HPP-12-92; 924 West Ottawa IV. PUBLIC HEARING A. Advertised Public Hearings: None B. Members of the Audience Wishing to Address the Commission - None Lansing Historic District Commission Minutes June 4, 1992 Page 2 V . BUS I NESS SESS I ON: a. Approval of Minutes: It was Moved by Bailer, Seconded by Sherman, and unanimously Carried to approve the minutes of May 7, 1992, as published. b. Old Business: 1 . 216 East Hillsdale -Update - Bill Acheson informed Commission members he and a Development Division staff member met with Mr. Davidson, the owner of 216 East Hillsdale. The owner has still not submitted his rehabilitation plans. The City Attorney supports our decision to "make safe" this property rather than demolish it and this may be become a legal battle in court. The Commission will oppose demolition of this structure. Bill Acheson wi I I add this property to the Commission's agenda every month and will call a special meeting of the Commission if a wrecking permit is submitted. 2. Sparrow Hospital Overpass -Update - Bill Acheson informed Commission members that Jim Spackman, Planning Division Deputy Director, has met with Sparrow Hospital regarding the overpass. At this time, Sparrow Hospital is not certain they want to install an overpass; however, they claim that an overpass will not block the view of the Capitol. Following discussion, it was Moved by Sherman, Seconded by Bailer, and unanimously Carried that The Historic District Commission ison record opposing a structure that would block the view down Michigan Avenue of the State Capitol . 3. Downtown Design Standards -Signs - Bill Acheson informed Commission members that at the September meeting he hopes to present to the Commission Design Standards for review to be recommended to the Mayor and City County to become a policy of the Planning Division in dealing with signs downtown. Lansing Historic District Commission Minutes June 4, 1992 Page 3 C. New Business: 1 . HPP-11-92; 415 North Pine - Commission members reviewed sl ides of the structure at 415 North Pine. Following discussion, it was Moved by Blanck, Supported by Sherman, and unanimously Carried to grant up to $10,000 to restore the structure as proposed. Determinations made by Commission members are contained in a memorandum to Ron Stonehouse, Development Division Director, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes. 2. HPP-12-92; 924 West Ottawa - Commission members reviewed slides of the structure at 924 West Ottawa. Following discussion, it was Moved by Sherman, Supported by Blanck, and Carried, with one member abstaining, to grant up to $10,000 to restore the structure as proposed with a more pleasing color combination and softer contrasts. VI . ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was Moved by Ba i len , Seconded by Blanck, and Carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 6:47 p.m. TO: FROM: DATE: CITY of LANSING INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION Ronald G. Stonehouse, Development Division Director William C. Acheson, Senior Planner, Planning Division Planning & Municipal Development Department June 11, 1992 SUBJECT: 415 NORTH PINE (HPP-11-92) The Lansing Historic District Commission, at a regularly scheduled meeting on June 4, 1992, reviewed an application to participate in the Historic Preservation Loan Program, for 415 North Pine (HPP-11- 92). This application was submitted by Marshall S. Burns. The Commission voted to include this address in the Historic Preservation Loan Program for an amount not to exceed $10,000 for the following work: 1) Cleaning, repair and painting of original siding and trim. Paint colors must be appropriate to the architectural style and period of the structure and approved by staff. 2) Cleaning, repair and painting of the carriage house on site to match the main building as outlined in (1) above. 3) Removal of existing rail in rear second floor deck. Replacement with a rail that matches the period and architecture of the building. 4) Installation of central air-conditioning, provided all window units are removed and the outdoor portions of the system are hidden at the rear of the building. 5) Porch repair to include replacement of non -period step railings with those that match the period and architecture of the building. Also, overgrown landscaping obscuring the porch should be removed or cut back appropriately. 6) Repair of all windows as necessary. This includes the replacement or painting of raw aluminum storm windows. 7) Repair of all doors as necessary. Memorandum to Ronald G. Stonehouse June 11, 1992 Page 2 HPP-11-92 8) Repair or replacement of the roof of the house and carriage house with roofing of a style and color to be compatible with original architecture and period. 9) Remove television antenna on roof. 10) Clean, repair and tuck -point original chimney. The applicant is advised that three estimates of project costs must be submitted. Development Division approval prior to work commencing must be obtained. In addition, the applicant is advised that scale drawings and specifications of paint color, roofing, etc., as necessary to guide the proposed work, must be submitted. If you have any questions, please contact me. WCA/jar cc: Alan E. Tubbs James N. Foulds Historic District Commission Members Royce Pugh Marshall S. Burns Planning Division Department of Planning and Municipal Development Znd=1oor.'Nasningion Square Annex 119 North Wasningcon Square Lansinc, Michican 18933 5i71483-d0oo Terry J. UcKane. Mayer June 11 , 1992 Mr. Thomas F. Bialozynski 128 Ridgewood Holly Hill, Florida 32117-5028 Dear Mr. Bialozynski: SUBJECT: 924 WEST OTTAWA (HPP-1 2-92 ) This office is in receipt of the application you submitted for participation in Lansing's Historic Preservation Program. Upon review of that application, we note that the structure at 924 West Ottawa Street is an occupied rental structure. Unfortunately, structures with occupied rental units cannot be accepted into the program at this time. There is no relocation assistance available. Thank you for your interest. Sincerely, Uiff", (-- cj",, William C . Acheson Historic Preservation Planner WCA/jar cc: Alan E. Tubbs James N . Fou I ds Ronald G . Storehouse Royce Pugh Historic District Commission Members equal Opportunity Empioyer LANSING HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MINUTES September 16, 1992 . I . CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 5:45 p.m. by Chairman Alfred Eger in the 2nd Floor Conference Room located at 119 North Washington Square, Washington Square Annex. II . ROLL CALL Members Present: Members Absent: Staff Member Present: Guests: Alfred A. Eger Suzanne L. Sawyer -Burleson Fred Blanck Wilbur Sherman Mark Bailen None William Acheson None III . APPROVAL OF AGENDA It was Moved by Blanck, Seconded by Sawyer -Burleson, and unanimously Carried to approve the agenda with the following addition under New Business: C . 3. HPP-15-92; 1719 West Hillsdale IV. PUBLIC HEARING A. Advertised Public Hearings: None B . Members of the Audience Wishing to Address the Commission - None Lansing Historic District Commission Minutes September 16, 1992 Page 2 V . BUSINESS SESSION: a. Approval of Minutes: It was Moved by unanimously Carrie b. Old Business: d 1. HPP-5-92; 529 Cherry/HPP-12-92; 924 West Ottawa/HPP-13-92; 106-108 East Grand River - Occupied Rental Structures - Policy Change? - Bill Acheson informed Commission members that 529 Cherry; 924 West Ottawa; and 106-08 East Grand River are all occupied rental units and; therefore, according to present policy, not eligible for the Historic Preservation Loan Program. There is a question of liability for relocation benefits. The Planning Division is looking into a possible change to the city' s policy to include occupied rental units. This may require additional paperwork to avoid relocation liability. However, until the policy is changed regarding relocation benefits, occupied units will not be processed. The amount of money required for relocation will severely cut the amount of rehabilitation that may be done. Bill Acheson will report on the proposed policy change as soon as a decision has been made. 2. Downtown Design Standards -Signs - Bill Acheson updated Commission members about the portion of the Sign Code that deals with the Capital Center District. The code calls for a limitation of 40 square feet of wall sign space. Projecting signs are allowed only in the Capital Center District providing they fit in with the character of the downtown area . This is the basis for the Commission to begin work on Downtown Design Standards. c . New Business: 1 . (HPP-13-92) 1006-08 East Grand River - Commission members examined plans and pictures submitted for restoration of the Lansing Historic District Commission Minutes September 16, 1992 Page 3 commercial structure at 106-08 East Grand River. Following discussion, it was Moved by Bailen, Supported by Sawyer - Burleson, and unanimously Carried to grant up to $15,000 to restore the structure provided the front facade is restored, as possible, including the doors and windows. Determinations made by Commission members are contained in a memorandum to Alan Tubbs, Planning and Municipal Development Department Director, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes. 2. (HPP-14-92) 319 West Shiawassee - Commission members examined plans and pictures submitted for restoration of the Carriage House at 319 West Shiawassee . Following discussion, it was Moved by Bailen , Supported by Blanck, and unanimously Carried to grant up to $4,000 to restore the structure as proposed. Determinations made by Commission members are contained in a memorandum to Alan Tubbs, Planning and Municipal Development Department Director, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes. 3. (HPP-15-92) 1719 West Hillsdale - Commission members examined plans and pictures submitted for restoration of the commercial structure at 1719 West Hillsdale. Following discussion, it was Moved by Blanck , Supported by Sherman, and unanimously Carried to grant up to $4,500 to restore the structure as proposed. Determinations made by Commission members are contained in a memorandum to Alan Tubbs, Planning and Municipal Development Department Director, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes. 4. LASER - Bill Acheson informed Commission members that LASER (Lansing Area Sentencing Enhancement and Rehabilitation) wants to put a facility at 336 Hillsdale. This is in the Cherry Hill area but not in the Cherry Hill Historic District. LASER provides room and board, case management, transportation, financial counseling, recreational and 24 hour supervision to male (non-violent) offenders sentenced by the 30th District Court as an alternative to incarceration. The neighborhood is upset. This facility would have 12 units, with 4 people to a bedroom (72 people) . Letters and telephone calls from the Lansing Historic District Commission Minutes September 16, 1992 Page 4 neighborhood stating their opposition to this facility have been received. Following discussion, determinations made by Commission members are contained in a letter to Mayor Terry J . Mc Kane, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes. 5. Sexton High School is celebrating its 50th year with an open house in November. It was the consensus of Commission members to use this open house to promote the Historic District Commission. Al Eger will obtain the information and bring it to the next meeting. 6. Mini -grant information from the Michigan Humanities Council - The Letter of Intent for a mini -grant from the Michigan Humanities Council should be submitted by October 11. Following discussion it was the consensus of Commission members to hold off at this time. Suzanne Sawyer -Burleson will ask the council to send her their January schedule and she will present it to the Commission when received. VI. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was Moved by Bailen , Seconded by Blanck , and Carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 7:24 p.m . TO: CITY of LANSING INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION Alan E. Tubbs, Director FROM: William C. Acheson, Senior Planner, Planning Division Planning & Municipal Development Department DATE: September 18, 1992 SUBJECT: 106-08 East Grand River (HPP-13-92) At a specially scheduled meeting on September 16, 1992, the Historic District Commission reviewed an application to participate in the Historic Preservation Loan Program for 106-08 East Grand River (HPP-13-92). This application was submitted by Mr. Arthur Santa Cruz. This is a commercial structure which includes two store fronts located in the North Lansing Historic District which is a National Register District. Most of the structure was completed in 1895. The Commission found the structure to merit inclusion in the Preservation Loan Program for an amount not to exceed $15,000 provided the following work is done: 1) Repoint north facade brick work. Repair brick as necessary. 2) Provide design for and replace portions of the north facade with material which fits the architectural style and period of the building. This includes the glass and metal doors and storm windows. Scale elevations which are sufficient to guide work must be submitted and approved prior to construction. 3) Stucco repair will be allowed provided it is done in a type and color which blends with the original parts of the building. 4) Provide more detailed information about the treatment of the rear of the building, especially the railing for the upper deck. The design should be compatible with the period and architectural style of the building. The applicant has been advised that construction should not commence until the Development Division provides a notice to proceed and that proper invoices and other documentation as necessary will be required prior to disbursement of funds. Three estimates are required for work scheduled. Memorandum to Alan E. Tubbs September 18, 1992 Page 2 HPP-13-92 The applicant has submitted some detail of work on photographs. Some additional detail, including paint color specification will be required. This is a commercial building. The applicant must observe Davis - Bacon wage guidelines for any work done on the building. The Human Relations Department (483-4088) must be contacted prior to construction to assure compliance with Davis -Bacon. If you have any questions, please contact me. WCA/jar cc: James N. Foulds Historic District Commission Members Royce Pugh Arthur Santa Cruz TO: FROM: DATE: CITY of LANSING INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION x Alan E. Tubbs, Director William C. Acheson, Senior Planner, Planning Division Planning & Municipal Development Department September 18, 1992 SUBJECT: 319 West Shiawassee (Carriage House) (HPP-14-92) At a specially scheduled meeting on September 16, 1992, the Historic District Commission reviewed an application to participate in the Historic Preservation Loan Program for a Carriage house at 319 West Shiawassee Street (HPP-14-92). This application .was submitted by Marceline Lantz. The Commission found that the Carriage house structure, which is located at the rear of the lot at 319 West Shiawassee Street, is worthy to be included in the loan program for an amount not to exceed $4,000. This is one of a very few Carriage houses left in the City. The following work was approved: 1) Straighten building, install new concrete footings and new pressure treated sills. The building shall remain at original elevation and new footings disguised to appear original or not visible. 2) Remove existing roof and install new rafters, sheathing and new roofing materials. The new roof should have a texture and appearance of original roofing. 3) Repair/replace siding and trim as needed. All replacement material must be of the same dimension and texture of original. 4) Install one new door and repair windows and doors as necessary. These items should appear as original. S) Prime and paint the building exterior in colors and of a scheme which complements the period style and architecture of the building. 6) Install a new concerte floor. The applicant is advised that three estimates of project costs must be submitted. Development Division approval prior to work commencing must be received. Memorandum to Alan E. Tubbs September 18, 1992 Page 2 HPP-14-92 In addition, the applicant is advised that scale elevations of the building, as necessary to show those elements of the building that are affected, must be submitted. These, in conjunction with specifications for paint and other detail, must be sufficient to provide a guide for the proposed work. If you have any questions, please contact me. WCA/jar cc: James N. Foulds Historic District Commission Members Royce Pugh Marceline Lantz CITY of LANSING INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION'''`'=�'s''^ WL 14116 TO: Alan E. Tubbs, Director FROM: William C. Acheson, Senior Planner, Planning Division Planning & Municipal Development Department DATE: September 18, 1992 SUBJECT: 1719 West Hillsdale (HPP-15-92) At a meeting held on September 16, 1992, the Historic District Commission reviewed an application to participate in the Historic Preservation Loan Program by Jacquelynne K. Borden for 1719 West Hillsdale (HPP-15-92). The Commission found that this structure, built in 1929, while not particularly noteworthy, is in a strategic location. Sensitive restoration of the structure will serve the area well. The Commission determined that the structure and garage are worthy to be included in the program in an amount not to exceed $4,500 for the following work: 1) Scrape, repair siding and paint the house trim. Paint color shall be approved by staff. 2) Repair and paint garage. Paint color shall match the house and be.approved by staff. 3) The applicant wishes to replace the front and side doors with steel doors. This is acceptable if the new doors are of the same style and size as the original doors, however, repair of original doors is preferred, if possible. 4) Repair front steps, porch and rail. These items appear to be original to the house. Repair should be as original. 5) Repair and/or replace windows and storms. Repair of original elements of any historic structure is preferable to replacement. However, if replacement is necessary, those replacements shall replicate the originals. In addition, storm windows, if necessary, must not obscure the original style windows and shall not be raw aluminum but rather have a baked -on color surface which matches the paint scheme of the house. Memorandum to Alan E. Tubbs HPP-15-92 September 18, 1992 Page 2 The applicant has been advised that three estimates of project costs must be submitted and Development Division approval must be received prior to work commencing. In addition, the applicant has been advised that scale elevations of the building, as necessary to show those elements of the building that are affected, must be submitted. These drawings, along with specifications for paint and other detail, must be sufficient to provide a guide for the proposed work. If you have any questions, please contact me. WCA/jar cc: James N. Foulds Historic District Commission Members Royce Pugh Jacquelynne K. Borden Planning Division Development Department of Planning and MunicipalP ment 'A. � ; `, Z�� 2nd Floor, Washington Square Annex 119 North Washington Square E` Lansing, Michigan 48933 1,7 (517)483-4066 September 22, 1992 Terry J. McKane, Mayor The Honorable Terry J. McKane Mayor of Lansing City Hall, 9th Floor 124 West Michigan Lansing, Michigan 48933 Dear Mayor McKane: SUBJECT: LASER PROPOSAL, 336 EAST HILLSDALE The property at 336 East Hillsdale is located in the Cherry Hill neighborhood. As you know, the Cherry Hill neighborhood contains the Cherry Hill Historic District which was designated in 1989. The designation of the Cherry Hill Historic District was a joint effort by the neighborhood and the City of Lansing to preserve a residential presence downtown in a historic context. The members of the Historic District Commission feel that the LASER proposal for 336 East Hillsdale, because of increased traffic and nonresidential nature, may weaken the neighborhood's attractiveness for resident/owners and, therefore, hamper the improvement of the district. It was also hoped that the district could be expanded to include all of the significant structures in the neighborhood. The indirect effect of the LASER proposal may hamper any expansion effort if owners / residents leave the area. In summary, the Historic District Commission opposes the placement of a LASER facility at 336 East Hillsdale Street. If you should have any questions, please contact either William Acheson in the Planning Division or myself. Sincerely, �c Alfre A. Eger, Lansing Historic WCA/jar cc: Alan E . Tubbs James N . Foulds Cherry Hill neighborhood z A ,. Chairman District Commission "Equal Opportunity Employer" LANS I NG HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MINUTES October 1 , 1992 I . CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 5:45 p.m. by Chairman Alfred Eger in the 2nd Floor Conference Room located at 119 North Washington Square, Washington Square Annex. 11 . ROLL CALL Members Present: Alfred A. Eger Suzanne L. Sawyer -Burleson Fred Blanck Wilbur Sherman Members Absent: Mark Bai len Ca Staff Member Present: Wi I l iam Acheson N j= Guests: None c� I I I . APPROVAL OF AGENDA R, _ iv ca It was Moved by Burleson, Seconded by Blanck, and unanimously Carried to approve the agenda with the fol lowing additions underWl*w Business: C . 4. HPP-1 9-92; 801 Bancroft 5. Act-8-92; Sparrow Hospital Overpass IV. PUBLIC HEARING A. Advertised Public Hearings: None B. Members of the Audience Wishing to Address the Commission - None Lansing Historic District Commission Minutes October 1 , 1992 Page 2 V , BUS IN ESS SESS ION: a. Approval of Minutes: It was Moved by Sherman, Seconded by B I anck , and unanimously Carried to approve the minutes of September 16, 1992, as published. b. Old Business: 1 . Commission members reviewed and discussed the letter sent to the Mayor on September 22, 1992, regarding the LASER Proposal at 336 East Hillsdale. c. New Business: 1 . (HPP-16-92) 110 East Kilborn - Commission members examined plans and pictures submitted forrestoration of thestructure at 110 East Kilborn. Following discussion, it was Moved by Blanck, Supported by Sherman, and unanimously Carried to grant up to $5,000 to restore the structure as proposed. Determinations made by Commission members are contained in a memorandum to Alan Tubbs, Planning and Municipal Development Department Director, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes. 2. (HPP-17-92) 112 East Kilborn - Commission members examined plans and pictures submitted for restoration of the structure at 112 East Kilborn. Following discussion, it was Moved by Sawyer -Burleson, Supported by Sherman, and unanimously Carried to grant up to $7,500 to restore the structure as proposed. Determinations made by Commission members are contained in a memorandum to Alan Tubbs, Planning and Municipal Development Department Director, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes. 3. (HPP-18-92) 114 East Kilborn - Commission members examined plans and pictures submitted for restoration of the structure at 114 East Kilborn. Following discussion, it was Moved by Sherman, Supported by Blanck, and unanimously Carried to grant up to $5 ,000 to restore the structure as proposed. Lansing Historic District Commission Minutes October 1 , 1992 Page 3 Determinations made by Commission members are contained in a memorandum to Alan Tubbs, Planning and Municipal Development Department Director, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes. 4. (HPP-19-92) 801 Bancroft - Commission members examined plans and pictures submitted for restoration of the structure at 801 Bancroft. Following discussion, it was Moved by Sawyer - Burleson, Supported by Sherman, and unanimously Carried to grant up to $5,000 to restore the structure, but defer finalization until more specific information is available. Determinations made by Commission members are contained in a memorandum to Alan Tubbs, Planning and Municipal Development Department Director, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes. 5. Act-8-92, Sparrow Hospital -Commission members reviewed the proposal of Sparrow Hospital to connect the north complex with the facility south of Michigan Avenue with a pedestrian bridge over the public right-of-way. The proposed bridge would be just east of the Jones Street intersection with Michigan Avenue, have an approximate third story height, and would require two support columns within the right-of-way. The pedway would connect the main hospital building with a new family practice structure. Following discussion, it was Moved Blanck, Supported by Sherman, and unanimously Carried to approve the concept; however, the overpass should be high enough that the dome of the Capitol is not obstructed (estimate of four stories); anything above four stories wi I I be acceptable. Determinations made by Commission members are contained in a Referral Sheet returned to James R. Spackman, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes. 6. Discussion ensued relating to the possibility of developing signage for future Historic District Loan Program projects to make neighborhood people aware that monies going into the structure are coming from the Historic District Commission and the Community Development Block Grant Program. Bi II Acheson will check into this possibility and report at the next meeting. Lansing Historic District Commission Minutes October 1 , 1992 Page 4 VI . ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was Moved by Sawyer -Burleson, Seconded by Sherman, and Carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 7:08 p.m. F L Ays� CITY of LANSING I; INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION .......... �^ Y TO: Alan E. Tubbs, Director Planning & Municipal Development Department (, FROM: William C. Acheson, Senior Planner, Planning Division Planning & Municipal Development Department DATE: October 2, 1992 SUBJECT: 110 East Kilborn (HPP-16-92) At a regularly scheduled meeting on October 1, 1992, the Historic District Commission reviewed an application to participate in the Historic Preservation Loan Program for 110 East Kilborn (HPP-16- 92). This application was submitted by the Franklin Street Community Housing Cooperative. This is one of three structures in the 100 block of East Kilborn that the Franklin Street Cooperative is planning to restore. This single-family structure will be offered on a lease -to -purchase basis to low and moderate income persons. The other structures are: (a) 112 East Kilborn, a two unit structure which the cooperative will hold as rental property and (b) 114 East Kilborn, a one -unit structure which also will be offered on a lease -to - purchase basis. All three structures were found to merit inclusion in the Historic Preservation Program. The structure at 110 East Kilborn was included for an amount not to exceed $5,000 for the following work: 1) Paint and repair original wood siding on both garage and house. This shall be done with colors and style which are compatible with the period of the house. The garage shall match. A three color scheme is appropriate. Colors must be approved by city preservation staff. 2) Repair of existing original porches is preferred and recommended. The porches, posts, steps and handrails shall be as original. Original or original repaired material shall be used where possible. This includes the replacement of non -period elements where appropriate. Removal of overgrown landscape materials around this porch is also covered. 3) Repair and/or replacement of doors, windows and storms as necessary. Any replacement or repair shall duplicate originals as closely as possible in size, operation and style. No raw aluminum windows or storms will be Memorandum to Alan E. Tubbs HPP-16-92 October 2, 1992 Page 2 allowed. All window frame colors shall be compatible with the period of the building and match the approved color scheme. The applicant is advised that three estimates of project costs must be submitted. Development Division approval prior to work commencing must be received. In addition, the applicant is advised that scale elevations of the building, as necessary to show those elements of the building that are affected, must be submitted. These, in conjunction with specifications for paint and other detail, should be sufficient to provide a guide for the proposed work. If you have any questions, please contact me. WCA/jar cc: James N. Foulds Historic District Commission Members Royce Pugh Lynne Martinez, Franklin Street Community Housing Cooperative TO: FROM: DATE: CITY of LANSING INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION Alan E. Tubbs, Director Planning & Municipal Development Department William C. Acheson, Senior Planner, Planning Division Planning & Municipal Development Department October 2, 1992 SUBJECT: 112 East Kilborn (HPP-17-92) At a regularly scheduled meeting on October 1, 1992, the Historic District Commission reviewed an application to participate in the Historic Preservation Loan Program for 112 East Kilborn (HPP-17- 92). This application was submitted by the Franklin Street Community Housing Cooperative. This is one of three properties in the 100 block of East Kilborn that Franklin Street Cooperative is planning to restore. This is a two-family residential structure which will be held as a rental property by the cooperative. The other structures are: (a) 110 East Kilborn and 114 East Kilborn which are residences which will be offered on a lease -to -purchase basis to low and moderate income persons. All three structures were found to merit inclusion in the Historic Preservation Program. The structure at 112 East Kilborn was included for an amount not to exceed $7, S00 for the following work: 1) Paint and repair original wood siding on both garage and house. This shall be done with colors and style which are compatible with the period of the house. The garage shall match. A three color scheme is appropriate. Colors must be approved by city preservation staff. 2) Repair to existing original porches is preferred and recommended. The porches, posts, steps and handrailings shall be as original. Original or repaired original shall be used where possible. This includes the replacement of non -period elements where appropriate. 3) Repair and/or replacement of doors, windows, and storms as necessary. Any replacement or repair shall duplicate originals as closely as possible in size, operation and style. No raw aluminum doors, windows or storms are allowed. All window frame colors shall be compatible with the periodof the building and match the approved color scheme. Memorandum to Alan E. Tubbs October 2, 1992 Page 2 HPP-17-92 The applicant is advised that three estimates of project costs must be submitted. Development Division approval prior to work commencing must be received. In addition, the applicant is advised that scale elevations of the building, as necessary to show those elements of the building that are affected, must be submitted. These, in conjunction with specifications for paint and other detail, should be sufficient to provide a guide for the proposed work. If you have any questions, please contact me. WCA/jar cc: James N. Foulds Historic District Commission Members Royce Pugh Lynne Martinez, Franklin Street Community Housing Cooperative rdF —LA -1'5� CITY of LANSINC'�., �..I b _r _ f 7 Y■ �7 '1 'r INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION .. .... .. • �. • . . . III:,• �!�►jCNGP� itrr N TO: Alan E. Tubbs, Director Planning & Municipal Development Department FROM: William C. Acheson, Senior Planner, Planning Division �. Planning & Municipal Development Department DATE: October 2, 1992 SUBJECT: 114 East Kilborn (HPP-18-92) At a regularly scheduled meeting on October 1, 1992, the Historic District Commission reviewed an application to participate in the Historic Preservation Loan Program for 114 East Kilborn (HPP-18- 92). This application was submitted by the .Franklin Street Community Housing Cooperative. This is one of three structures in the 100 block of East Kilborn that will be restored. This single-family structure will be offered on a lease -to -purchase basis to low and moderate income persons. The other structures are: (a) 110 East Kilborn, a one unit structure that will also be offered on a lease -to -purchase basis and (b) 112 East Kilborn, a two -unit structure which the cooperative will hold as rental property. All three structures were found to merit inclusion in the Historic Preservation Program. The structure at 114 East Kilborn was included for an amount not to exceed $5,000 for the following work: 1) Paint and repair original wood siding on both garage and house. This shall be done with colors and style which are compatible with the period of the house. The garage shall match. A three color scheme is appropriate. Colors must be approved by city preservation staff. 2) Repair to existing original porches is preferred and recommended. The porches, posts, steps and handrails shall be as original. Original or original repaired material shall be used where possible. This includes the replacement of non -period elements where appropriate. 3) Repair and/or replacement of windows, doors and storms as necessary. Any replacement or repair shall duplicate originals as closely as possible in size, operation and style. No raw aluminum doors, windows or storms are allowed. All window frame colors shall be compatible with the period of the building and match the approved color scheme. Memorandum to Alan E. Tubbs HPP-18-92 October 2, 1992 Page 2 The applicant is advised that three estimates of project costs must be submitted. Development Division approval prior to work commencing must be received. In addition, the applicant is advised that scale elevations of the building, as necessary to show those elements of the building that are affected, must be submitted. These, in conjunction with specifications for paint and other detail, should be sufficient to provide a guide for the proposed work. If you have any questions, please contact me. WCA/jar cc: James N. Foulds Historic District Commission Members Royce Pugh Lynne Martinez, Franklin Street Community Housing Cooperative CITY of LANSING INTEROFFICE COMMUNICATION TO: Alan E. Tubbs, Director FROM: William C. Acheson, Senior Planner, Planning Division ('� Gp\ Planning & Municipal Development Department DATE: October 2, 1992 SUBJECT: 801 Bancroft Court (HPP-19-92) At a regular meeting on October 1, 1992, the Historic District Commission reviewed an application to participate in the Historic Preservation Loan Program for 801 Bancroft Court (HPP-19-92). This application was submitted by Mark John Yepko. The Commission found that the structure is worthy to be included in the loan program for an amount not to exceed $5,000. The following work was approved, provided required detail is provided: 1) Repair of the foundation. Foundation tuck -pointing and repair is allowed. However, an estimate of cost and some detail as to what will be done will be needed. 2) Painting or residing is allowed, depending on style, color, texture and gloss. Painting of original siding is the preferred option, if possible. Style, color, texture, and gloss of paint or new siding must be approved by staff. 3) Reroofing is allowed. The style, texture and color of the roof must be approved by staff. The applicant is advised that three estimates of project costs must be submitted. Development Division approval prior to work commencing must be received. In addition, the applicant is advised that scale elevations of the building, as necessary to show those elements of the building that are affected, must be submitted. These, in conjunction with specifications for paint and other detail, must be sufficient to provide a guide for the proposed work. If you have any questions, please contact me. WCA/jar cc: James N. Foulds Historic District Commission Members Royce Pugh Mark John Yepko REFERRAL SHEET FROM: JAMES R. SPACKMAN FILE NO.: ACT-8-92 DATE: September 17, 1992 Planning Division Department of Planning and Municipal Development 119 North Washington Square - Second Floor Washington Sq. Annex Lansing, MI 48933-1668 RECOMMENDATION - ACT 285, P.A. 1931 Consumers Power Company Transportation Engineer Board of Water and Light City Attorney Fire Marshal MI Dept of Management & Budget Parks & Recreation Dept. Assessor Development Division MI Dept of Transportation Mich. Bell Telephone Lansing Historic Dist. Commission Public Service Dept. Citizen Participation Groups Building Safety Division Eastside Neighborhood Org. Capitol Restoration Committee/Friends of the State Capitol The Planning Board, in accord with Act 285, Public Acts of 1931,-is required to review and make recommendations regarding location, character and extent of this project. Prior to their final recommendation and report, the Planning Board would appreciate your comments and requirements as they relate to your official function. Attached is a copy of the plans by Sparrow Hospital to construct a pedestrian overpass across E. Michigan Ave. just east of Jones Street. The pedway at the third level of the existing hospital structure is to connect with a proposed multistory ambulatory care facility on the south side of Michigan Avenue. A copy of Sparrow's site plan for the entire complex is available for viewing in the Planning Division. T�C. N-rper GMMISS� Ate- 8 -S z orj ocra%a- 1, 199 Z. , ��1C �.aMMr4too,.J Votto Ar -ritat" T]"e -ra APPK-iE TI'f-rr ce,rcifer F)zopA4:> Tk-9 a✓cfYAsS IS 4)NSTIzuL-rev Ar A Lt_l/r L, SD ANS 'ra fk4 Jr c2F- A,,J V IE W aF 114E STTT"E e-AFIJ.Ta L f3Ui L401-J{- Vk4►-1 sm- LZ , T] hs W�✓� t E 1 oJ� 1Z �sS A,r A Ltti�L Fvrt s; a�zl �`3 oV- I t-r cn We recommend this plan be approved i the above requirements are complied with. Signed: iA Please provide your remarks to the Planning Div. by September 25 Enclosure LANSING HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MINUTES November 5, 1992 I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 5 : 41 p.m. by Chairman Alfred Eger in the 2nd Floor Conference Room located at 119 North Washington Square, Washington Square Annex. II. ROLL CALL Members Present: Members Absent: Staff Members Present: Guests: Alfred A. Eger Fred Blanck Wilbur Sherman Mark Bailen Suzanne L. Sawyer -Burleson William Acheson James Ruff None III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA It was Moved by Blanck, Seconded by Sherman, and unanimous) Carried to approve the agenda with the following addition under Ne C. 2. Public Act 96 - Historic District Ordinance w IV. PUBLIC HEARING a. Advertised Public Hearings: None b . Members of the Audience Wishing to Address the Commission - None V. BUSINESS SESSION: a. Approval of Minutes: It was Moved by Sherman, Seconded by Bailen, and unanimously Carried to approve the minutes of October 1, 1992, as published. Lansing Historic District Commission Minutes November 5, 1992 Page 2 b . Old Business: Chairman Eger announced that Sexton High School will have a formal 50 year rededication ceremony on February 24, 1993, with the installation of a historic marker. Following discussion, it was Moved by Bailen, Seconded by Blanck and Carried unanimously to send a letter of recognition to Sexton High School for 50 years of service to the community. A copy of the letter is attached to and made a part of these minutes. A copy of the letter will be sent to Councilmember Ford as he will be the featured speaker. Loan Program Signs - Bill Acheson informed Commission members that due to the loss of the Graphics Coordinator in the Planning Division, the loan program signs have not vet been designed. It was the consensus of Commission members to defer this item until the next meeting. 3. Historic Loan Program - Bill Acheson informed Commission members that he has contacted the owners of the three historic loan program projects that have occupied units. Certified letters will be sent to the tenants informing them that the structure will be renovated. Occupied units have been eliminated from consideration in the loan program because if a tenant moves out and there is a question about why they moved out, the .city may be liable for relocation benefits. A letter must be written saying they are not eligible for relocation benefits and, if there are any questions, please call. These tenants are being warned that they cannot collect benefits. c . New Business: 1. HDC Staffing - Work Program - Chairman Al Eger welcomed staff member James Ruff, replacing Bill Acheson who is retiring, to the Historic District Commission. Commission members reviewed the 1992 Work Program and were asked to submit items for the development of a 1993 Work Program. Public Act 96 Historic District Ordinance - Bill Acheson informed Commission members that Public Act 96, passed June 18, 1992, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes, replaces Public Act 169 which mandates that the Historic District Ordinance needs to be amended if it is in conflict with state statute. Draft copies of Chapter 1220, Historic Districts reflecting the changes to the Ordinance were distributed for review, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes. Words to be deleted are crossed out and additions are in all caps. Mr. Acheson outlined the following substantial differences : Lansing Historic District Commission Minutes November 5, 1992 Page 3 (1) Demolition by neglect . The City can now go into a historic district and order a house fixed up. (2) There are substantially greater penalties. $5, 000 in lieu of $500 for each violation. (3) Revenue bonds. The City could issue revenue bonds for historic development. (4) The petition siZned by 610 of the landowners of properties located in the proposed Historic District has been omitted. (5) A study committee must be established in each district to study the possibility of a historic district designation. This committee will submit a report to the Historic District Commission. The Historic District Commission will then make a report to the Lansing City Council. That report will also go to the State of Michigan for approval. (6) There is a different appeal situation. Rather than appealing decisions of the Historic District Commission directly to circuit court, the first appeal will have to be made at the State of Michigan Board of History. Following discussion, it was Moved by Bailen, Seconded by Blanck, and Carried unanimously to send a letter with the revised ordinance to the City Attorney and Mayor with the Mayor forwarding the ordinance to the Lansing City Council for their consideration and action. It should be noted that the Historic District Ordinance expires December 19, 1993. VI. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was Moved by Sherman, Seconded by Bailen, and Carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 7 : 21 p.m. Planni Division Department of Planning and Municipal Development 2nd Floor, Washington Square Annex 119 North Wasninaton Square Lansing. Micnigan 48933 (517)483-4066 Terry J. McKane. Mayor Sexton Alumni Committee P.O. Box 16265 Lansing, MI 48901-6265 Dear Committee Members November 16, 1992 RE: J. W. Sexton High School Golden Anniversary The Lansing Historic District Commission extends a hearty congratulations to everyone involved in the J. W. Sexton High School Golden Anniversary celebration. The Commission is pleased that this important art deco style building will be honored. This sort of recognition will help ensure continued preservation and productive life for the building. With the type of dedication evidenced by the Sexton Alumni Committee, the School District, Sexton Staff, and Sexton students, this school will continue to provide the important architectural and cultural presence that it has for the past 50 years. Again, accept our congratulations and salutations. Sincerely yours Al d A. Eger, Ch2irman Historic District Committee WCA:LC CC: Dr. Richard Halik, Superintendent of Schools, Lansing School District Dr. Clyde D. Carnegie, Principal, J. W. Sexton High School Ms. Nancy Erickson, President, Lansing School Board Equal Opportunity Employer" Act No. 96 Public Acts of 1992 Approved by the Governor June 18, 1992 Filed with the Secretary of State June 18, 1992 STATE OF MICHIGAN 86TH LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION OF 1992 Introduced by Reps. Varga and Joe Young, Jr. Reps. Anthony, Bandstra, Bankes, Barns, Bartnik, Bennane, Bennett, Bobier, Brackenridge, Perry Bullard, Willis Bullard, Clack, Clarke, Dalman, DeMars, Dobb, Dobronski, Dolan, Dresch, Gagliardi, Gernaat, Gilmer, Goss, Gubow, Harder, Harrison, Jacobetti, Jaye, Johnson, Jonker, Keith, Kilpatrick, Kosteva, Leland, London, McBryde, Murphy, Olshove, Oxender, Palamara, Pitoniak, Profit, Saunders, Scott, Shugars, Stallworth, Wallace, Weeks and Yokich named co-sponsors ENROLLED HOUSE BILL No. 5504 AN ACT to amend the title and sections 1, 2, 3, 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. and 11 of Act No. 169 of the Public Acts of 1970. entitled as amended "An act to provide for establishment of historic districts: to provide for the acquisition of land and structures for historic purposes: to provide for preservation of historic and nonhistoric sites and structures within historic districts: to provide for the creation of historic district commissions: and to provide for the maintenance of publicly owned historic sites and structures by local units." sections 2 and 5 as amended by Act No. 230 of the Public Acts of 1986 and section 3 as amended by Act No. 125 of the Public Acts of 1980. being sections 399.201. 399.202, 399.203, 399.204. 399.205, 399.206, 399.207, 399.208, 399.209. 399.210. and 399.211 of the Michigan Compiled Laws: and to add sections Ia. 14. and 15. The People of the State of Michigan enact: Section 1. The title and sections 1. 2, 3. 4, 5, 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. and 11 of Act No. 169 of the Public Acts of 1970. sections 2 and 5 as amended by Act No. 230 of the Public Acts of 1986 and section 3 as amended by Act No. 125 of the Public Acts of 1980, being sections 399.201. 399.202. 399.203. 399.204. 399.205. 399,206, 399.207, 399.208. 399.209. 399.210, and 399.211 of the Michigan Compiled Laws. are amended and sections la, 14, and 15 are added to read as follows: TITLE An act to provide for the establishment of historic districts: to provide for the acquisition of certain resources for historic preservation purposes: to provide for preservation of historic and nonhistoric resources within historic districts: to provide for the establishment of historic district commissions: to provide for the .naintenance of publicly owned resources by local units: to provide for certain assessments ander certain circumstances: to provide for procedures: and to provide for remedies and penalties. Sec. 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "local historic districts act". Sec. Ia. As used in this act: (a) "Alteration" means work that changes the detail of a resource but does not change its basic size or shape. (b) "Bureau" means the bureau of history of the Michigan department of state. (83) (c) "Certificate of appropriateness" means the written approval of a permit application for work that is appropriate and that does not adversely affect a resource. (d) "Commission" means a historic district commission created by the legislative body of a local unit pursuant to section 4. (e) "Committee" means a historic district study committee appointed by the legislative body of a local unit pursuant to section 3 or 14. (f) "Demolition" means the razing or destruction, whether entirely or in part, of a resource and includes, but is not limited to, demolition by neglect. . (g) "Demolition by neglect" means neglect in maintaining, repairing, or securing a resource that results in deterioration of an exterior feature of the resource or the loss of structural integrity of the resource. (h) "Denial" means the written rejection of a permit application for work that is inappropriate and that adversely affects a resource. M "Historic district" means an area. or group of areas not necessarily having contiguous boundaries. that contains 1 resource or a group of resources that are related by history, architecture. archaeology, engineering, or culture. (j) "Historic preservation" means the identification. evaluation, establishment, and protection of resources significant in history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or culture. (k) "Historic resource" means a publicly or privately owned building, structure. site, object, feature. or open space that is significant in the history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or culture of this state or a community within this state, or of the United States. (l) "Local unit" means a county, city, village, or township. (m) "Notice to proceed" means the written permission to issue a permit for work that is inappropriate and that adversely affects a resource, pursuant to a finding under section 5(6). (n) "Open space" means undeveloped land, a naturally landscaped area, or a formal or man-made landscaped area that provides a connective link or a buffer between other resources. (o) "Ordinary maintenance" means keeping a resource unimpaired and in good condition through ongoing minor intervention, undertaken from time to time. in its exterior condition. Ordinary maintenance does not change the external appearance of the resource except through the elimination of the usual and expected effects of weathering. Ordinary maintenance does not constitute work for purposes of this act. (p) "Proposed historic district" means an area, or group of areas not necessarily having contiguous boundaries, that has delineated 'boundaries and that is under review by a committee or a standing committee for the purpose of making a recommendation as to whether it should be established as a historic district or added to an established historic district. (q) "Repair" means to restore a decayed or damaged resource to a good or sound condition by any process. A repair that changes the external appearance of a resource constitutes work for purposes of this act. (r) "Resource" means 1 or more publicly or privately owned historic or nonhistoric buildings, structures, sites, objects, features, or open spaces located within a historic district. (s) "Standing committee" means a permanent body established by the legislative body of a local unit pursuant to section 14 to conduct the activities of a historic district study committee on a continuing basis. (t) "Work" means construction, addition, alteration, repair, moving, excavation, or demolition. Sec. 2. Historic preservation is declared to be a public purpose and the legislative body of a local unit may by ordinance regulate the construction, addition. alteration. repair, moving, excavation, and demolition of resources in historic districts within the limits of the local unit. The purpose of the ordinance shall be to do 1 or more of the following: (a) Safeguard the heritage of the local unit by preserving 1 or more historic districts in the local unit that reflect elements of the unit's history, architecture. archaeology, engineering, or culture. (b) Stabilize and improve property values in each district and the surrounding areas. (c) Foster civic beauty. (d) Strengthen the local economy. (e) Promote the use of historic districts for the education, pleasure, and welfare of the citizens of the local unit and of the state. Sec. 3. (1) A local unit may, by ordinance. establish 1 or more historic districts. The historic districts shall be administered by a commission established pursuant to section 4. Before establishing a historic district, the legislative body of the local unit shall appoint a historic district study committee. The committee shall contain a township supervisor, village president, mayor, or chairperson of the board of commissioners, unless another method of appointment is provided in the ordinance creating the commission. Initial members shall be appointed within 6 months after the ordinance establishing the commission is enacted. Members shall be appointed for 3-year terms except the initial appointments of some of the members shall be for less than 3 years so that the initial appointments are staggered and that subsequent appointments do not recur at the same time. Members shall be eligible for reappointment. A vacancy on the commission shall be filled within 60 calendar days by an appointment made by the appointing authority. The ordinance creating the commission may provide procedures for terminating an appointment due to the acts or omissions of the member. The appointing authority of a local unit having a population of 25,000 or more individuals shall appoint at least 2 members from a list of citizens submitted by 1 or more duly organized local historic preservation organizations. A local unit having a population of more than 5,000 individuals but less than 25,000 individuals shall appoint at least 1 member from a list of citizens submitted by 1 or more duly organized local historic preservation organizations. The commission of all local units shall include as a member,. if available. a graduate of an accredited school of architecture who has 2 years of architectural experience or who is an architect registered in this state. This section does not apply to historic district commissions established by charter or to historic district commissions established by ordinance before August 3, 1970. Sec. 5. (1) A permit shall be obtained before any work affecting the exterior appearance of a resource is performed within a historic district or, if required under subsection (4), work affecting the interior arrangements of a resource is performed within a historic district. The person, individual, partnership, firm, corporation, organization, institution, or agency of government proposing to do that work shall file an application for a permit with the inspector of buildings, the commission, or other duly delegated authority. If the inspector of buildings or other authority receives the application. the application shall be immediately referred together with all required supporting materials that make the application complete to the commission. A permit shall not be issued and proposed work shall not proceed until the commission has acted on the application by issuing a certificate of appropriateness or a notice to proceed as prescribed in this act. A local unit may charge a reasonable fee to process a permit application. (2) An applicant aggrieved by a decision of a commission concerning a permit application may file an appeal with the state historic preservation review board of the Michigan historical commission within the department of state. The appeal shall be filed within 60 days after the decision is furnished to the applicant. The appellant may submit all or part of the appellant's evidence and arguments in written form. The review board shall consider an appeal at its first regularly scheduled meeting after receiving the appeal, but may not charge a fee for considering an appeal. The review board may affirm. modify, or set aside a commission's decision and may order a commission to issue a certificate of appropriateness or a notice to proceed. A permit applicant aggrieved by the decision of the state historic preservation review board may appeal the decision to the circuit court having jurisdiction over the historic district commission whose decision was appealed to the state historic preservation review board. (3) In reviewing plans, the commission shall follow the U.S. secretary of the interior's standards for rehabilitation and guidelines for rehabilitating historic buildings, as set forth in 36 C.F.R. part 67. Design review standards and guidelines that address special design characteristics of historic districts administered by the commission may be followed if they are equivalent in guidance to the secretary of interior's standards and guidelines and are established or approved by the bureau. The commission shall also con§ider.all of the following: (a) The historic or architectural value and significance of the resource and its relationship to the historic value of the surrounding area. (b) The relationship of any architectural features of the resource to the rest of the resource and to the surrounding area. (c) The general compatibility of the design, arrangement, texture, and materials proposed to be used. (d) Other factors. such as aesthetic value, that the commission finds relevant. (4) The commission shall review and act upon only exterior features of a resource and shall not review and act upon interior arrangements unless specifically authorized to do so by the local legislative body or unless interior work will cause visible change to the exterior of the resource. The commission shall not disapprove an application due to considerations not prescribed in subsection (3). (5) If an application is for work that will adversely affect the exterior of a resource the commission considers valuable to the local unit, state, or nation, and the. commission determines that the alteration or loss of that resource will adversely affect the public purpose of the local unit, state, or nation, the commission shall attempt to establish with the owner of the resource an economically feasible plan for preservation of the resource. (6) Work within a historic district shall be permitted through the issuance of a notice to proceed by the commission if any of the following conditions prevail and if the proposed work can be demonstrated by a finding of the commission to be necessary to substantially improve or correct any of the following conditions: from the issuance of revenue bonds: The acquisition shall be based upon the recommendation of the commission or standing committee. The commission or standing committee is responsible for maintaining publicly owned resources using its own funds, if not specifically designated for other purposes, or public funds committed for that use by the local legislative body. upon recommendation of the commission or standing committee, the local unit may sell resources acquired under this section with protective easements included in the property transfer documents, if appropriate. Sec. 8. The jurisdiction of a county shall be the same as that provided in Act No. 183 of the Public Acts of 1943, as amended, being sections 125.201 to 125.232 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, or as otherwise provided by contract entered into between the county and a city, village or township. If a county historic district commission is in existence. coordination between the county historic district commission and township and municipality historic district commissions shall be maintained. The overall historic preservation plans of cities, villages and townships shall be submitted to the county historic district commission for review, and county plans submitted to cities. villages, and townships having historic district commissions. Day-to-day activities of a commission shall not be reviewed unless the activities affect resources of importance to another commission. J. Sec. 9. (1) The commission shall file certificates of appropriateness. notices to proceed. and denials of applications for permits with the inspector of buildings or other delegated authority. A permit shall not be issued until the commission has acted as prescribed by this act. If a permit application is denied, the decision shall be binding on the inspector or other authority. A denial shall be accompanied with a written explanation by the commission of the reasons for denial and, if appropriate, a notice that an application may be resubmitted for commission review when suggested changes have been made. The denial shall also include notification of the applicant's rights of appeal to the state historic preservation review board and to the circuit court. The failure of the commission to act within 60 calendar days after the date a complete application is filed with the commission, unless an extension is agreed upon in writing by the applicant and the commission, shall be considered to constitute approval. (2) Local public officials and employees shall provide information and records to committees. commissions, and standing committees, and shall meet with those bodies upon request to assist with their activities. (3) The bureau shall cooperate with and assist local units, committees, commissions, and standing committees in carrying out the purposes of this act and may establish or approve standards, guidelines. and procedures that encourage uniform administration of this act in this state but that are not legally binding on anv individual or other legal entity. Sec. 10. Nothing in this act shall be construed to prevent ordinary maintenance or repair of a resource within a historic district. or to prevent work on any resource under a permit issued by the inspector of buildings or other duly deiegated authority before the ordinance was enacted. Sec. 11. Any citizen or duly organized historic preservation organization in the local unit, as well as resource property owners. jointly or severally aggrieved by a decision of the historic district commission may appeal the decision to the circuit court, except that a permit applicant aggrieved by a decision rendered under section 5(1) may not appeal to the court without first exhausting the right to appeal to the state historic preservation review board under section 5(2). Sec. 14. (1) A local unit may at any time establish by ordinance additional historic districts, including proposed districts previously considered and rejected. may modify boundaries of an existing historic district, or may eliminate an existing historic district. Before establishing, modifying, or eliminating a historic district, a historic district study committee appointed by the legislative body of the local unit shall, except as provided in subsection (2), comply with the procedures set forth in section 3 and shall consider any previously written committee reports pertinent to the proposed action. To conduct these activities, local units may retain the initial committee, establish a standing committee, or establish a committee to consider only specific proposed districts and then be dissolved. (2) If considering elimination of a historic district. a committee shall follow the procedures set forth in section :3 for issuing a preliminary report. holding a public hearing, and issuing a final report but with the intent of showing 1 or more of the following: (i) The historic district has lost those physical characteristics that enabled establishment of the district. (ii) The historic district was not significant in the way previously defined. (iii) The historic district was established pursuant to defective procedures. (3) Upon receipt of substantial evidence showing the presence of historic, architectural. archaeological. engineering, or cultural significance of a proposed historic district, the legislative body of a local unit may, at its discretion, adopt a resolution requiring that all applications for permits within the proposed historic district N. CHAPTER 1220 Historic Districts 1220.01 Purposes. 1220.06 Procedure for review of permit 1220.02 Definitions. applications; 1220.03 Procedure for certificates of approval. establishment. 1220.07 Removal or demolition of 1220.04 Historic District District resources. Commission established; 1220.08 NOTICE TC composition; terms of PROCEED. office; organization. 1220.09 �N(ai��G-e-g�atrts- �rrd 1220.05 Powers and duties g�. DEMOLITION BY of Commission. NEGLECT. 1220.10 Enfereement; appeals. WORK WITHOUT PERMIT. 1220.11 Etc�ratiet-t-e ehapter. YARL VARIANCES. 1220.12 ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS. ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS. 1220.13 ENFORCEMENT; APPEALS . 1220.14 EXPIRATION OF CHAPTER. 1220.99 Penalty. CROSS REFERENCES Historic districts- see M.C.L.A. D D399.201 et seq. Variances from the Zoning Code - see P. & Z. 1244.06, 1284.06, 1288.10 1220.01 PURPOSES. The purpose of this chapter is to provide for the recognition, preservation anc protection of historical and architectural sites, buildings, structures, objects, ope., spaces and features, hereinafter referred to as district resources, which are organize( into Historic Districts significant to the cultural, social, economic, political an( architectural heritage of the City. Further, the purposes of this chapter are to atabiliz-- anti4nlptoa-grc'pertry-Vakteq�,--stt-etrgthert-t-he-ieea}-ec¢rtCM- €ost� e-i�i� �xt�- a� �rriele-and-p re mo-te-tie -�tseo€�is-t�rrie�iet-�ie�a-€o�t-lte eekteat3o�- p stire-an4-wee&4-the-t-es-ieletrts-ef-t�i3s-�rt�z -P-aa&e4 REGULATE THE CONSTRUCTION, ADDITION, ALTERATION, REPAIR, MOVING EXCAVATION, AND DEMOLITION OF RESOURCES IN HISTORIC DISTRICTS. Ii ADDITION, THE PURPOSE SHALL BE TO ACCOMPLISH ONE OR MORE OF TH- FOLLOWING : 2 (a) SAFEGUARD THE CITY'S HERITAGE BY PRESERVING HISTORIC DISTRICT --- THAT REFLECT ELEMENTS OF LANSING'S HISTORY, ARCHITECTURE, ARCHAEOLOGY, ENGINEERING OR CULTURE. (b) STABILIZE AND IMPROVE PROPERTY VALUES IN EACH DISTRICT ANE SURROUNDING AREAS. (c) PRESERVE NEIGHBORHOODS. (d) STRENGTHEN THE LOCAL ECONOMY. (e) FOSTER CIVIC BEAUTY AND PRICE AND PROMOTE THE USE OF HISTORIC DISTRICT FOR THE EDUCATION, PLEASURE AND WELFARE OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE CITY AND/OR THE STATE. 1220.02 DEFINITIONS. As used in this chapter: (a) "Addition" means any construction, such as a porch or attached garage, which increases the height or floor area of an existing district resource or adds to it. (b) "Alteration" means eensr�i,--repk�cnen-c��-�euiedej�rtlrix-r�r-a€-= eliat--.e-f-rese-dree-re9t��ti -irrair to er-e�ian�e- e-s rite ttra€-garter,--tom RoC�ftan-e€�perirrrgs-car � Ioeat-ie r-er-zxppea a ree-e€-t-lte-clime r res�trre�e- �tti-eyes-art-€r�erease=rlie-o�er�H-elrrsiene WORK THAT CHANGES THE DETAIL OF A RESOURCE BUT DOES NOT CHANGE ITS BASIC SIZE OR SHAPE. (c) "BUREAU" MEANS THE BUREAU OF HISTORY OF THE MICHIGA� DEPARTMENT OF STATE. (d) Ee3 "Certificate of approval" means the written approval of the�iie-t-erie-Bit-pie E�nr sgivrrrtr€-pima-ffrr- new �r�t�xeeien,-r�el�i�ioir,-a�te��ieri-,-elesicri}�ir7rr 3 reeens rt�r ivr�,--rel�a rik a -repay,--reatci"at4en--mOvinb -of--dstrict resen-in-d�signaeel- i�isari�-Bcries A PERMIT APPLICATION FOR WORK THAT IS APPROPRIATE AND THAT DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT A RESOURCE. (e) "COMMISSION" MEANS THE LANSING HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION WHICH WAS CREATED BY THE LANSING CITY COUNCIL. (f) "COMMITTEE" MEANS A HISTORIC DISTRICT STUDY COMMITTEE APPOINTED BY THE LANSING CITY COUNCIL. (g) f d3 "Demolition" means the RAZING OR destruction, al4 WHETHER ENTIRELY or in part, of a eliat-riot resource AND INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, DEMOLITION BY NEGLECT. (h) "DEMOLITION BY NEGLECT" MEANS NEGLECT IN MAINTAINING, REPAIRING, OR SECURING A RESOURCE THAT RESULTS IN DETERIORATION OF AN EXTERIOR FEATURE OF THE RESOURCE OR THE LOSS OF STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE RESOURCE. (i) "DENIAL" MEANS THE WRITTEN REJECTION OF A PERMIT APPLICATION FOR WORK THAT IS INAPPROPRIATE AND THAT ADVERSELY AFFECTS A RESOURCE. (j) fed "District resource" means a site, building, structure, object, open space or feature to be found individually or in a related group within a Historic District. Specifically: (1) "Site" means a district resource that is related to important historica; events, a prehistoric or historic occupation or activity, an institution_ or organization or an architectural district resource that is ruined or vanished, where the location itself maintains historical valuF 4 regardless of the value of any existing architectural district resources. Examples: historic marker, commemorative plaque, (2) "Building" means an existing or proposed residential, commercial, industrial or institutional district resource created to shelter any form of human activity. Examples: house, courthouse, jail, barn, church, theater, hospital, office building. (3) "Structure" means an existing or proposed district resource made up of interdependent and interrelated parts in a definite pattern of organization, often reflective of an engineering design. Examples: bridge, dam, water tower, bell tower. (4) "Object" means a district resource of functional, aesthetic, cultural, historical, architectural or scientific value that may be, by nature of design, movable, yet related to a specific setting or environment. Examples: statue, fountain, lighting fixture, sign, sundial. (5) "Open space" means a district resource that is undeveloped land, a naturally landscaped area, a formal or man-made landscape or developed open space, significant as a connective link or buffer between other district resources. Examples: naturally landscaped park, formal garden, vacant land, parking lot. (6) "Feature" means a prominent or distinctive aspect, quality or characteristic of a designated Historic District. Examples: landscapec boulevard, brick paving, tree -lined street. (k) f€i "Elevation" means a scale drawing of the side, front or rear facades of a giver district resource. (1) fb} "Historic" means the age of a district resource; however, there is no age limi- implied by the use of the term "historic." Rather, the term shall apply to and 5 district resource that is significant to the overall appearance of a Historic District and that plays a role in the evolutionary growth of a Historic District's streetscape . (m) fhj "Historic District" means a geographically defined area, OR GROUP OF AREAS, NOT NECESSARILY HAVING CONTIGUOUS BOUNDARIES, THAT CONTAINS iriePa4ing a district resource or a group of district resources. THAT ARE RELATED BY HISTORY, ARCHITECTURE, ARCHAEOLOGY. ENGINEERING OR CULTURE, AND established by the City for the purposE of preservation. The City may establish more than one such Historic District. am-�tiek- istvrie-�isi�}eta-neeel-pro-be--crnrtig�ttxxts- Usually, distric. resources within the boundaries of a Historic District are related by historica. or architectural significance. However, a Historic District may also consis- of a single district resource unrelated to its surroundings in historical of architectural significance and so designated by this chapter. (n) ¢r "Historic District Commission" means the member body established by the Cit for the purpose of execution of this chapter. (o) fjj "Historic preservation" means the IDENTIFICATION, EVALUATION ESTABLISHMENT AND protection, AS WELL AS rehabilitation, restoration o. reconstruction of resources e€risericai-o�-srelte�t�z-�iifica�3e SIGNIFICANT IN HISTORY, ARCHITECTURE, ARCHAEOLOGY ENGINEERING, OR CULTURE. (p) "HISTORIC RESOURCE" MEANS A PUBLICLY OR PRIVATELY OWNEI BUILDING, STRUCTURE, SITE, OBJECT, FEATURE, OR OPEN SPACE THA- IS SIGNIFICANT IN THE HISTORY, ARCHITECTURE, ARCHAEOLOGY ENGINEERING, OR CULTURE OF THIS STATE OR A COMMUNITY WITHI_ THIS STATE, OR OF THE UNITED STATES. C.1 (q) fk3 "Honorary designation" means recognition of important historical events, institutions or organizations related to district resources, where the district resources themselves are not necessarily historically or architecturally significant. (r) fPj "Landowner" means any individual, business or association having legal or equitable title in real property. (s) "LOCAL UNIT" MEANS A COUNTY, CITY, VILLAGE, OR TOWNSHIP. (t) Errr) "New construction" means planned district resources that are to bE constructed or placed within a designated Historic District. Such planned new, construction, because it will have a significant effect on the overal= appearance of a Historic District, and because it will play a role in the evolutionary growth of a Historic District's streetscape, shall be treated aE "historic" by the Historic District Commission, the same as older, existinL district resources. (u) "NOTICE TO PROCEED" MEANS THE WRITTEN PERMISSION TO ISSUE 1 PERMIT FOR WORK THAT IS INAPPROPRIATE AND THAT ADVERSEL- AFFECTS A RESOURCE, PURSUANT TO A FINDING UNDER CHAPTE: 1220.08. (v) "OPEN SPACE" MEANS UNDEVELOPED LAND, A NATURALLY LANDSCAPE -- AREA, OR A FORMAL OR MAN-MADE LANDSCAPED AREA THAT PROVIDE A CONNECTIVE LINK OR A BUFFER BETWEEN OTHER RESOURCES. (w) "ORDINARY MAINTENANCE" MEANS KEEPING A RESOURCE UNIMPAIRE AND IN GOOD CONDITION THROUGH ONGOING MINOR INTERVENTION UNDERTAKEN FROM TIME TO TIME, IN ITS EXTERIOR CONDITION ORDINARY MAINTENANCE DOES NOT CHANGE THE EXTERNF. APPEARANCE OF THE RESOURCE EXCEPT THROUGH THE ELIMINATION C THE USUAL AND EXPECTED EFFECTS OF WEATHERING. ORDINARY MAINTENANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE WORK FOR PURPOSES OF THIS ACT . (x) fnj "Preservation standards and guidelines" means preservation principles which shall be considered by the Historic District Commission in assessing the appropriateness of activities which will affect district resources included in designated Historic Districts . General and nationally accepted preservation standards, such as the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, will initially be used by the Commission. However, the Commission shall develop more specific guidelines within the parameters established by such nationally accepted preservation standards. (y) "PROPOSED HISTORIC DISTRICT" MEANS AN AREA, OR GROUP OF AREAS NOT NECESSARILY HAVING CONTIGUOUS BOUNDARIES, THAT HAS DELINEATED BOUNDARIES AND THAT IS UNDER REVIEW BY A COMMITTEE OR A STANDING COMMITTEE FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING A RECOMMENDATION AS TO WHETHER IT SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED AS A HISTORIC DISTRICT OR ADDED TO AN ESTABLISHED HISTORIC DISTRICT. (z) fa} "Reconstruction" means the process of reproducing by new construction the exact form and detail of a vanished district resource, or part thereof, as it appeared at a specific time. (aa) fpj "Rehabilitation" means the revitalization of a district resource through the introduction of modern mechanical systems, structural elements and decorative features. However, such modern improvements should be sympathetic to the district resource's original style, size, color and texture. and should be reversible. (bb) Fq3 "Repair" means the -rriai3tz anee of-,-er-re r e;-a7 t--t)€-ttti�i`t--e€ is yic� resatit-es TO RESTORE A DECAYED OR DAMAGED RESOURCE TO A GOOD OR SOUND CONDITION BY ANY PROCESS. A REPAIR THAT CHANGES THE EXTERNAL APPEARANCE OF A RESOURCE CONSTITUTES WORK FOR PURPOSES OF THIS ACT. (cc) "RESOURCE" MEANS 1 OR MORE PUBLICLY OR PRIVATELY OWNEL HISTORIC OR NONHISTORIC BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, SITES, OBJECTS, FEATURES, OR OPEN SPACES LOCATED WITHIN A HISTORIC DISTRICT. (dd) f r� "Restoration" means the process of accurately recovering the form and detai: of a district resource as it appeared at a particular period of time, bs removing later work, replacing missing elements or enhancing original work. f Ot-d - f fry- --Pft&&ed (ee) "STANDING COMMITTEE" MEANS A PERMANENT BODY ESTABLISHED B�- THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF A LOCAL UNIT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14 TC CONDUCT THE ACTIVITIES OF A HISTORIC DISTRICT STUDY COMMITTE ON A CONTINUING BASIS. (ff) "WORK" MEANS CONSTRUCTION, ADDITION, ALTERATION, REPAIR MOVING, EXCAVATION, OR DEMOLITION. 1220.03 PROCEDURE FOR ESTABLISHMENT. (a) Historic districts shall be established by ordinance. The Historic Distric Commission shall conduct studies and research and make reports on th historical and architectural significance of districts, sites, buildings structures, objects, open spaces and features in the City. 3Ecxnmissirtrrr repo-�I�aH-eantai�r�e.�x�°r�°ie�re�at�ens-eeneer�n�the az°ea�e-be-xrrel�.rc�eci= ea.ek-prepes-C-api,--&tr€-#�re-�ep �-1�aH-bezra str ted f review--dlld -Boas-��re 0 E�rrrt�i�eirtnr� -tYie-Sate-H3st-o-ri-eel-rk��istirr�,�-E�tx�x�i-�-a�--t�-pt��rli�-tepr� re guest- -Net �a ter tlia�r sit:y f}sus- a€derIie-fit} ; tire- �rxsirtnr sia he4d das -p-14ee-�c -tire-else-a t - ptrbiie4t&&rirrg,--tl-r -a rters -ctf-aH-prep et-�ies--te-be-irrcltl 4n7sueh-H4.9torir DIS tr i-Ct-er it e-gi en-v;rk-ten netice-t'k—__ -itnen4inz the -es�a] }ia rien-of -a-i-hster%c--Bist-riet; -the- -shall- petrt4an-signe4-byy-et -least-pCry;catr-(}f--tht—_ iftneltyrners-ef�-grepertie lc��tt�,:i*li3n-tY�e�-r�Qs�el-Hista�ie-Bis�rie�- (b) Oz er-the- Iiea��n�,--tire--Cermnissietra--final-rep art-T-w4t-h- t: reearrrrnen�iati sz -thoo-s-e-e€ihe-Planning-Bearei;-anel-a raf -aka-prepose e r ellnanee ; -t o- �-ottnelh- EE}q-d7r -PRIOR TO ESTABLISHING A DISTRICT, , HISTORIC DISTRICT STUDY COMMITTEE SHALL BE FORMED. THI. COMMITTEE SHALL HAVE LOCAL HISTORIC ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATION, AS POSSIBLE, AND CONTAIN A MAJORITY OF PERSON WHO HAVE A CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED INTEREST IN OR A KNOWLEDG OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION. STUDY COMMITTEES MAY BE FORMED A THE REQUEST OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION OR BY REQUES FROM THE COMMUNITY. A REQUEST TO FORM A HISTORIC DISTRIC RECEIVED FROM PROPERTY OWNERS SHALL REQUIRE THE FORMATION C A STUDY COMMITTEE. MEMBERS OF THE STUDY COMMITTEE SHALL E RECOMMENDED BY THE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION TO THE MAYOF THE MAYOR SHALL MAKE COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS WITH CITY COUNC: CONFIRMATION. THE COMMITTEE SHALL DO ALL OF THE FOLLOWING: 10 (1) CONDUCT A PHOTOGRAPHIC INVENTORY OF RESOURCES WITHIN EACH PROPOSED HISTORIC DISTRICT FOLLOWING PROCEDURES ESTABLISHED OR APPROVED BY THE BUREAU. (2) CONDUCT BASIC RESEARCH OF EACH PROPOSED HISTORIC DISTRICT AND THE HISTORIC RESOURCES LOCATED WITHIN THAT DISTRICT. (3) DETERMINE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF HISTORIC AND NONHISTORIC RESOURCES WITHIN A PROPOSED HISTORIC DISTRICT AND THE PERCENTAGE OF HISTORIC RESOURCES OF THAT TOTAL. IN EVALUATING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF HISTORIC RESOURCES, THE COMMITTEE SHALL BE GUIDED BY THE SELECTION CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION ISSUED BY THE UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR FOR INCLUSION OF RESOURCES IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES, AS SET FORTH IN 36 C. F. R. PART 60, AND CRITERIA ESTABLISHED OR APPROVED BY THE BUREAU, IF ANY. (4) PREPARE A PRELIMINARY HISTORIC DISTRICT STUDY COMMITTEE REPORT THAT ADDRESSES AT A MINIMUM ALL OF THE FOLLOWING: (a) THE CHARGE OF THE COMMITTEE. (b) THE COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP. (c) THE HISTORIC DISTRICT OR DISTRICTS STUDIES. (d) THE BOUNDARIES FOR EACH PROPOSED HISTORIC DISTRICT IN WRITING AND ON MAPS . (e) THE HISTORY OF EACH PROPOSED HISTORIC DISTRICT. (f) THE SIGNIFICANCE OF EACH DISTRICT AS A WHOLE, AS WELL AS A SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF ITS INDIVIDUAL RESOURCES 11 TO FULLY REPRESENT THE VARIETY OF RESOURCES FOUND WITHIN THE DISTRICT, RELATIVE TO THE EVALUATION CRITERIA. (5) TRANSMIT COPIES OF THE PRELIMINARY REPORT FOR REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE PLANNING BOARD TO THE BUREAU, TO THE MICHIGAN HISTORICAL COMMISSION, AND TO THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW BOARD. (6) MAKE COPIES OF THE PRELIMINARY REPORT AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (4) . (7) NOT LESS THAN 60 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE TRANSMITTAL OF THE PRELIMINARY REPORT, THE COMMITTEE SHALL. HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING IN COMPLIANCE WITH ACT NO. 267 OF THE PUBLIC ACTS OF 1976, AS AMENDED, BEING SECTIONS 15.261 TC 15.275 OF THE MICHIGAN COMPILED LAWS. PUBLIC NOTICE OF THI TIME, DATE, AND PLACE OF THE HEARING SHALL BE GIVEN IN THY MANNER REQUIRED BY ACT NO. 267 OF THE PUBLIC ACTS OF 1976 AS AMENDED. WRITTEN NOTICE SHALL BE MAILED BY FIRST- CLASS MAIL NOT LESS THAN 14 CALENDAR DAYS BEFORE THI HEARING TO THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTIES WITHIN THI PROPOSED HISTORIC DISTRICT, AS LISTED ON THE ASSESSOR' TAX RECORDS. (c) THE COMMITTEE SHALL BE REQUIRED, IN A TIME PERIOD NOT TO EXCEEI ONE YEAR (365 DAYS) AFTER THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE, UNLES. OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, TO TAKE TH_ FOLLOWING ACTIONS: 12 (1) THE COMMITTEE SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT WITH ITS RECOMMENDATIONS AND THE RECOMMENDATION, IF ANY, OF THE PLANNING BOARD AND HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. IF THE RECOMMENDATIONS IS TO ESTABLISH A HISTORIC DISTRICT OR DISTRICTS, THE FINAL REPORT SHALL INCLUDE A DRAFT OF A PROPOSED ORDINANCE OR ORDINANCES. (2) AFTER RECEIVING A FINAL REPORT THAT RECOMMENDS THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A HISTORIC DISTRICT OR DISTRICTS, THE CITY COUNCIL, AT ITS DISCRETION, MAY INTRODUCE AND PASS OR REJECT AN ORDINANCE OR ORDINANCES. IF AN ORDINANCE OR ORDINANCES ARE APPROVED ESTABLISHING 1 OR MORE HISTORIC DISTRICTS, A COPY OF THAT ORDINANCE OR ORDINANCES, INCLUDING LEGAL DESCRIPTION OR DESCRIPTIONS OF THE PROPERTY OR PROPERTIES IN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT OF DISTRICTS, SHALL BE FILED WITH THE INGHAM COUNTY REGISTEF OF DEEDS. THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL NOT APPROVE AP ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A CONTIGUOUS HISTORIC DISTRIC'= LESS THAN 60 DAYS AFTER A MAJORITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER: WITHIN THE PROPOSED DISTRICT, AS LISTED IN THE TA: RECORDS OF THE ASSESSOR'S OFFICE, HAVE APPROVED TH.- ESTABLISHMENT OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO _ WRITTEN REQUEST . (3) A WRITING PREPARED, OWNED, USED, IN THE POSSESSION OF, 0- RETAINED BY A COMMITTEE IN THE PERFORMANCE OF AN OFFICIA FUNCTION SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC Ii 13 COMPLIANCE WITH ACT NO. 442 OF THE PUBLIC ACTS OF 1976, AS AMENDED, BEING SECTIONS 15.231 TO 15.246 OF THE MICHIGAN COMPILED LAWS. (d) THE CITY MAY AT ANY TIME ESTABLISH BY ORDINANCE ADDITIONAL HISTORIC DISTRICTS, INCLUDING PROPOSED DISTRICTS PREVIOUSLY CONSIDERED AND REJECTED, MAY MODIFY BOUNDARIES OF AN EXISTING HISTORIC DISTRICT, OR MAY ELIMINATE AN EXISTING HISTORIC DISTRICT. BEFORE ESTABLISHING, MODIFYING, OR ELIMINATING A HISTORIC DISTRICT, A HISTORIC DISTRICT STUDY COMMITTEE SHALI] BE ESTABLISHED AS OUTLINED IN CHAPTER 1220.03(b) TO CONSIDER ANY PREVIOUSLY WRITTEN COMMITTEE REPORTS PERTINENT TO THE PROPOSED ACTION. TO CONDUCT THESE ACTIVITIES, LOCAL UNITS MAY RETAIN THE INITIAL COMMITTEE, ESTABLISH A STANDING COMMITTEE, OR ESTABLISH A COMMITTEE TO CONSIDER ONLY SPECIFIC PROPOSED DISTRICTS AND THEN BE DISSOLVED. (e) IF CONSIDERING ELIMINATION OF A HISTORIC DISTRICT, A COMMITTEE SHALL FOLLOW THE PROCEDURES SET FORTH IN SECTION 3 FOR ISSUING A PRELIMINARY REPORT, HOLDING A PUBLIC HEARING, AND ISSUING A FINAL REPORT BUT WITH THE INTENT OF SHOWING 1 OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: (1) THE HISTORIC DISTRICT HAS LOST THOSE PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT ENABLED ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DISTRICT . (2) THE HISTORIC DISTRICT WAS NOT SIGNIFICANT IN THE WAY PREVIOUSLY DEFINED. 14 (3) THE HISTORIC DISTRICT WAS ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TC DEFECTIVE PROCEDURES. (f) UPON RECEIPT OF SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE SHOWING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC, ARCHITECTURAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, ENGINEERING, OF CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE OF A PROPOSED HISTORIC DISTRICT, THI LEGISLATIVE BODY OF A CITY MAY, AT ITS DISCRETION, ADOPT RESOLUTION REQUIRING THAT ALL APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS WITHIr THE PROPOSED HISTORIC DISTRICT BE REFERRED TO THE COMMISSIOr AS PRESCRIBED IN CHAPTERS 1220.05 AND 1220.07. THE COMMISSIOl SHALL REVIEW PERMIT APPLICATIONS WITH THE SAME POWERS THA1 WOULD APPLY IF THE PROPOSED HISTORIC DISTRICT WAS AT ESTABLISHED HISTORIC DISTRICT. THE REVIEW MAY CONTINUE IN TH, PROPOSED HISTORIC DISTRICT FOR NOT MORE THAN 1 YEAR, OR UNTI- SUCH TIME AS THE LOCAL UNIT APPROVES OR REJECTS THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT BY ORDINANCE WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST. (g) IF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF A LOCAL UNIT DETERMINES THAT PENDIN1 WORK WILL CAUSE IRREPARABLE HARM TO RESOURCES LOCATED WITHL- AN ESTABLISHED HISTORIC DISTRICT OR A PROPOSED HISTORI; DISTRICT, THE LEGISLATIVE BODY MAY BY RESOLUTION DECLARE A: EMERGENCY MORATORIUM OF ALL SUCH WORK FOR A PERIOD NOT' T EXCEED 6 MONTHS. THE LEGISLATIVE BODY MAY EXTEND TH EMERGENCY MORATORIUM FOR AN ADDITIONAL PERIOD NOT TO EXCEE. 6 MONTHS UPON FINDING THAT THE THREAT OF IRREPARABLE HARM T RESOURCES IS STILL PRESENT. ANY PENDING PERMIT APPLICATIO 15 CONCERNING A RESOURCE SUBJECT TO AN EMERGENCY MORATORIM MAY BE SUMMARILY DENIED. 1220.04 HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION ESTABLISHED; COMPOSITION; TERMS OF OFFICE; ORGANIZATION. (a) The Historic District Commission is hereby established. The Commission sha: consist of seven members whose residences are located within the City. The - shall be appointed by the Mayor, with the consent of Council, for terms c office of three years, provided that two of the initial members shall b appointed for one year, two for two years and three for three years, as th initial terms expire. At least two members shall be appointed from a list c residents submitted by a duly organized and existing preservation society and at least one member shall bean architect, duly registered in this Stai WITH TWO YEARS EXPERIENCE, if such a person resides within the City an is available for appointment. A MAJORITY OF THE MEMBERS SHALL HAV A CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED INTEREST IN OR KNOWLEDGE OF HISTORI PRESERVATION. Members of the Commission may be reappointed. A vacanc occurring in the membership of'the Commission for any cause shall be fi11F by a person appointed by the Mayor, with the consent of Council, for .tl unexpired term WITHIN 60 DAYS, IF POSSIBLE. All members of tl- Commission shall serve without compensation. (b) The Chairperson shall be elected annually by a majority vote of the membe, of the Commission. The Commission may meet at such times as the Commissic may determine or as otherwise required in this chapter. The Commission shy adopt its own rules of procedure and shall keep a record of its proceeding. 16 showing the action of the Commission and the vote of each member upon each question considered. All meetings of the Commission shall be open to the public and any person shall be entitled to address the Commission before it reaches a decision. The Commission shall keep a record which shall be open to the public. The presence of four members shall constitute a quorum. In the absence of a quorum, any number less than a quorum may recess any meeting to a later time. -P-&es-eel 1220.05 POWERS AND DUTIES OF COMMISSION. (a) The Historic District Commission shall review all permits required by City ordinance concerning construction, alteration, repair, moving or demolition of the exterior features of a district resource, OR INTERIOR WORK ONLY IF SAID WORK WILL CAUSE A VISIBLE CHANGE TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE RESOURCE along with all accompanying plans and information as they pertain to the exterior features only. I-rrrt-awe-c7T`--elisagpee--perrrriz ap�riica-t3ens-r�ne� p}�ns-be€c�re -� �errrri#-rega}reel-fig -Ely -o�i�3ee f� s t�e?� aeti- -t r--C�-be- br-&Mt-e-d-}ry--t-he-Department--of--giatrrri197'--antir-i�'In riei l Dev-e4t7grrrent--Rt-re-�-iewingg-perrni-ampkea}io-r3e-ar�el-p�an9;- 13e-6tn�r io 9h$}}-��Q--t� defft-tiott-QNl-- t} ?e} �-A PERMIT SHALL NOT BE ISSUED AND PROPOSED WORK SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL THE COMMISSION HAS ACTED ON THE APPLICATION BY ISSUING A CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL OR A NOTICE TO PROCEED. (b) AN APPLICANT AGGRIEVED BY A DECISION OF A COMMISSION CONCERNING A PERMIT APPLICATION MAY FILE AN APPEAL WITH THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW BOARD OF THE MICHIGAN 17 HISTORICAL COMMISSION WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. THE APPEAL SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 60 DAYS AFTER THE DECISION IS FURNISHED TO THE APPLICANT. THE APPELLANT MAY SUBMIT ALL OR PART OF THE APPELLANT'S EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENTS IN WRITTEN FORM. THE REVIEW BOARD SHALL CONSIDER AN APPEAL AT ITS FIRST REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING AFTER RECEIVING THE APPEAL, BUT MAY NOT CHARGE A FEE FOR CONSIDERING AN APPEAL. THE REVIEW BOARD MAY AFFIRM, MODIFY, OR SET ASIDE A COMMISSION'S DECISION AND MAY ORDER A COMMISSION TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL OR A NOTICE TO PROCEED. A PERMIT APPLICANT AGGRIEVED BY THE DECISION OF THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW BOARD MAY APPEAL THE DECISION TO THE CIRCUIT COURT HAVING JURISDICTION OVER THE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION WHOSE DECISION WAS APPEALED TO THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW BOARD. (c) IN REVIEWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS AND PLANS, THE COMMISSION SHALL FOLLOW THE U.S. SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR'S STANDARD FOR REHABILITATION AND GUIDELINES FOR REHABILITATING HISTORIC BUILDINGS, AS SET FORTH IN 36 C.F.R. PART 67. THE COMMISSION SHALL ALSO CONSIDER ALL OF THE FOLLOWING: (1) The historical or architectural value and significance of a structure oz building and its relationship to the historic value of the surroundinL- area; (2) The relationship of the exterior architectural features of the structurF or building to the rest of the structure or building and to thF surrounding area; In (3) The general compatibility of exterior design, arrangement, texture and materials proposed to be used; and (4) Any other factors, including aesthetic, which it deems pertinent. (d) (b) The Commission shall recommend to Council the establishment and/or deletion of any Historic District. 1220.06 PROCEDURE FOR REVIEW OF PERMIT APPLICATIONS; CERTIFICATES OF APPROVAL. (a) Officials of the Department of Planning and Municipal Development, in reviewing all applications for permits, shall ascertain whether or not district resources are located in designated Historic Districts and, if so, shall advise applicants of the requirements . An application for a permit required by City ordinance to construct, alter, repair, move or demolish any structure or tc erect any sign within a Historic District shall be forwarded to the Historic District Commission by the Department, with all accompanying plans anc information. The Commission shall then hold a public hearing upon at leas; ten days written notice to the applicant EXCEPT AS NOTED IN 1220.06(b) . The applicant or his or her representative may be heard in person or it writing and may present evidence, witnesses and arguments. Any other person or his or her representative may be heard before the Commission of any matter relevant to the Commission's decision. (b) OFFICIALS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND MUNICIPAI DEVELOPMENT ARE EMPOWERED TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF APPROVA-L FOR MINOR CLASSES OF WORK AS SPECIFIED BY RESOLUTION OF TH-, 101 HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION. CERTIFICATES OF APPROVAL ISSUED BY STAFF SHALL BE REVIEWED BY THE COMMISSION ON A MONTHLY BASIS. (c) Approval of applications for a permit required by City ordinance shall be evidenced by a certificate of approval signed by the chairperson of the Commission. (d) IF AN APPLICATION IS FOR WORK THE COMMISSION FINDS WILL ADVERSELY AFFECT THE EXTERIOR OF A RESOURCE, A CERTIFICATE OF DENIAL WILL BE ISSUED. Disapproval will be evidenced by a written statement of findings of fact signed by the concurring members, which statement shall be attached to the application and returned to the Department with any suggestions as to how the plans might be modified for resubmission and approval. (e) Any application not acted upon by the Commission within forty-five days of receipt by the Commission shall constitute approval by the Commission, unless otherwise mutually agreed upon by the applicant and the Commission, and the Department official shall proceed to process the application without regard to an attached certificate of approval. f et-dr - fr£rr --Pa�se4-1-2--Y9—&3- -} 1220.07 REMOVAL OR DEMOLITION OF DISTRICT RESOURCES. (a) A certificate of approval which will allow for the removal, demolition, repair or alteration of the exterior features of a district resource shall be granted by the Historic District Commission if any of the following conditions prevail and if, in the opinion of the Commission, the proposed removal or demolition_ will materially improve or correct such conditions: 20 (1) The Department of Planning and Municipal Development official determines the district resource to be a hazard to public safety or health or to its occupants; (2) The district resource is a deterrent to a major improvement program which will be of substantial benefit to the community AND THE APPLICANT PROPOSING THE WORK HAS OBTAINED ALL NECESSARY PLANNING AND ZONING APPROVALS, FINANCING, AND ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCES; (3) Retention of the district resource would not be in the best interests 'of the majority of the community; or (4) Retention of the structure would cause undue financial hardship to the owner WHEN GOVERNMENTAL ACTION, AN ACT OF GOD, OR OTHER EVENTS BEYOND THE OWNER'S CONTROL CREATED THE HARDSHIP, AND ALL FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES TO ELIMINATE THE FINANCIAL HARDSHIP, WHICH MAY INCLUDE OFFERING THE RESOURCE AT IT, - FAIR MARKET VALUE OR MOVING THE RESOURCE TO A VACAN i SITE WITHIN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT, HAVE BEEN ATTEMPTEI AND EXHAUSTED BY THE OWNER. (b) In the case of an application concerning a district resource which the Commission deems so valuable to the City, State or nation that the los: thereof will adversely affect the public purpose of the City, State or nation the Commission shall endeavor to develop with the owner an economicall, feasible plan for preservation of the district resource. 12-19-83-3 1220.08 Y4. R-D;�hR3-A44C-1�S- NOTICE TO PROCEED. 21 WORK WITHIN A HISTORIC DISTRICT SHALL BE PERMITTED THROUGH THE ISSUANCE OF A NOTICE TO PROCEED BY THE COMMISSION IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS PREVAIL AND IF THE PROPOSED WORK CAN BE DEMONSTRATED BY A FINDING OF THE COMMISSION TO BE NECESSARY TO SUBSTANTIALLY IMPROVE OR CORRECT ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (a) THE RESOURCE CONSTITUTES A HAZARD TO THE SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC OR THE STRUCTURE'S OCCUPANTS. (b) THE RESOURCE IS A DETERRENT TO A MAJOR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM THAT WILL BE OF SUBSTANTIAL BENEFIT TO THE COMMUNITY AND THE APPLICANT PROPOSING THE WORK HAS OBTAINED ALL NECESSARY PLANNING AND ZONING APPROVALS, FINANCING, AND ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCES. (c) RETAINING THE RESOURCE WILL CAUSE UNDUE FINANCIAL HARDSHIP TO THE OWNER WHEN A GOVERNMENTAL ACTION, AN ACT OF GOD, OR OTHER EVENTS BEYOND THE OWNER'S CONTROL CREATED THE HARDSHIP, AND ALL FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES TO ELIMINATE THE FINANCIAL HARDSHIP, WHICH MAY INCLUDE OFFERING THE RESOURCE FOR SALE AT ITS FAIR MARKET VALUE OR MOVING THE RESOURCE TO A VACANT SITE WITHIN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT, HAVE BEEN ATTEMPTED AND EXHAUSTED BY THE OWNER. (d) RETAINING THE RESOURCE IS NOT IN THE INTEREST OF THE MAJORITY OF THE COMMUNITY. 1220.09 DEMOLITION BY NEGLECT. UPON A FINDING BY A COMMISSION THAT A HISTORIC RESOURCE WITHIN A HISTORIC DISTRICT OR A PROPOSED HISTORIC DISTRICT SUBJECT TO ITS PO REVIEW AND APPROVAL IS THREATENED WITH DEMOLITION BY NEGLECT, THE COMMISSION MAY DO EITHER OF THE FOLLOWING: (1) REQUIRE THE OWNER OF THE RESOURCE TO REPAIR ALL CONDITIONS CONTRIBUTING TO DEMOLITION BY NEGLECT. (2) IF THE OWNER DOES NOT MAKE REPAIRS WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME, THE COMMISSION OR ITS AGENTS MAY ENTER THE PROPERTY AND MAKE SUCH REPAIRS AS ARE NECESSARY TO PREVENT DEMOLITION BY NEGLECT. THE COSTS OF THE WORK SHALL BE CHARGED TO THE OWNER, AND MAY BE LEVIED BY THE CITY AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGAINST THE PROPERTY. THE COMMISSION OR ITS AGENTS MAY ENTER THE PROPERTY FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION UPON OBTAINING AN ORDER FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT. 1220.10 WORK WITHOUT PERMIT. WHEN WORK HAS BEEN DONE UPON A RESOURCE WITHOUT A PERMIT, AND THE COMMISSION FINDS THAT THE WORK DOES NOT QUALIFY FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL, THE COMMISSION MAY REQUIRE AN OWNER TO RESTORE THE RESOURCE TO THE CONDITION THE RESOURCE WAS IN BEFORE THE INAPPROPRIATE WORK OR TO MODIFY THE WORK SO THAT IT QUALIFIES FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL. IF THE OWNER DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE RESTORATION OR MODIFICATION REQUIREMENT WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME, THE COMMISSION MAY SEEK AN ORDER FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT TO REQUIRE THE OWNER TO RESTORE THE RESOURCE TO ITS FORMER CONDITION OR TO MODIFY THE WORK SO THAT IT QUALIFIES FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL. IF THE OWNER DOES NOT COMPLY OR CANNOT COMPLY WITH THE ORDER OF THE COURT, THE COMMISSION OR ITS AGENTS MAY ENTER THE PROPERTY AND 23 CONDUCT WORK NECESSARY TO RESTORE THE RESOURCE TO ITS FORMER CONDITION OR MODIFY THE WORK SO THAT IT QUALIFIES FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COURT'S ORDER. THE COSTS OF THE WORK SHALL BE CHARGED TO THE OWNER, AND MAY BE LEVIED BY THE CITY AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGAINST THE PROPERTY. WHEN ACTING PURSUANT TO AN ORDER OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, A COMMISSION OR ITS AGENTS MAY ENTER A PROPERTY FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION. 1220.11 YARD VARIANCES. Due to particular conditions of design and construction in historic neighborhoods where structures are often built close to lot lines, and since it is in the public interest to retain a neighborhood's historic appearance by making variances tc normal yard requirements where it is deemed that such variances will not adversely - affect neighborhood properties, the Historic District Commission may recommend tc the Board of Zoning Appeals that a variance to standard yard requirements be made. f 4i-d-.- -&6 .. - -Parsee} -�2-- --� -)- 1220.12 ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS; ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS. (a) The Historic District Commission may accept, on behalf -of the City, grant from the State or Federal Government for historic restoration purposes. I- may accept other public and private gifts for historic purposes. Title to ans. such property shall be vested in the City and all moneys shall be depositec with the City Treasurer. 24 (b) IF ALL EFFORTS BY THE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION TO PRESERVE A RESOURCE FAIL, OR IF IT IS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL LEGISLATIVE BODY THAT PUBLIC OWNERSHIP IS MOST SUITABLE, THE CITY COUNCIL, IF CONSIDERED TO BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MAY ACQUIRE THE RESOURCE USING PUBLIC FUNDS, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE GIFTS, GRANTS, OR PROCEEDS FROM THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS. THE ACQUISITION SHALL BE BASED UPON THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMISSION OR STANDING COMMITTEE. THE COMMISSION OR STANDING COMMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PUBLICLY OWNEE RESOURCES USING ITS OWN FUNDS, IF NOT SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATEI; FOR OTHER PURPOSES, OR PUBLIC FUNDS COMMITTED FOR THAT USE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. UPON RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMISSION OR STANDING COMMITTEE, THE LOCAL UNIT MAY SELL RESOURCES ACQUIRED UNDER THIS SECTION WITH PROTECTIVE EASEMENT INCLUDED IN THE PROPERTY TRANSFER DOCUMENTS, IF APPROPRIATE. 1220.13 1229719 ENFORCEMENT; APPEALS. (a) The enforcement of this chapter shall be the responsibility of the Departmen, of Planning and Municipal Development. fb3 Arny-persons-j-erinrt4)y--er to ?6,- 11 agb eyed-b•y-zx eeisien-fr€-the- �Hsteprit Distri&-Oomnliasioi-r-S�I+-hr&ve-t-he-store-ri-grrt-� deetaiorr -Of -t4 -B-oard -C f- E-vt�t2g- rk-pp eai-� - EGt- -.--665----Passed--12- 9-53-) ANY CITIZEN OR DULY ORGANIZEL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORGANIZATION IN THE LOCAL UNIT, AS WELL AS RESOURCE PROPERTY OWNERS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY AGGRIEVED 25