HomeMy WebLinkAboutBZA 4-10-25 Minutes
Board of Zoning Appeals Minutes April 10, 2025 Page 1
__________________________________________________________________________________
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING – Approved July 10, 2025
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Thursday, April 10, 2025, 6:30 P.M.
600 W. Maple Street, Lansing MI
I. ROLL CALL
The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Alling at 6:30 p.m.
Present: M. Alling, K. Berryman, B. Fryling, C. Iannuzzi, H. Lowry, M. Jackson, M. Rice
& E. Jefferson
Absent: None
Staff: S. Stachowiak
A quorum of at least five members was present, allowing voting action to be taken at the
meeting.
II APPROVAL OF AGENDA
It was moved by Mr. Iannuzzi, seconded by Mr. Lowry to approve the agenda as printed.
On a voice vote, the motion carried unanimously (8-0).
III. PUBLIC COMMENT
Alex Slovinski, 6103 Scotmar Drive, spoke in opposition to the variance requests for the
proposed sports complex on E. Miller Road, expressing concerns about noise and traffic.
Stacy Lynch, 6101 Scotmar Drive, spoke in opposition to the variances. She stated that the
building will be out of character for the area and will diminish the view from her home which is
located directly across the street.
Erin Fleck, 1753 Maisonette Drive expressed concerns about the location, given the already
high volumes of traffic in the area and the limited traffic control systems,
Brian Fisher, 6245 Timberland Drive, spoke in favor of the request. He said that most of the
noise will be confined to the dome and the traffic will not be as high as what is anticipated as
most of the time there are only 2-4 teams playing at one time and there is a lot of ridesharing.
Alexandra Fisher, 6245 Timberland Drive, spoke in favor of the request. She said that an
indoor sports complex allows sports to continue in the winter and the additional traffic that
would be generated could result in changes to the traffic control system in the area to resolve
some of the concerns that have been expressed by the area residents.
Christina Fisher, 6245 Timberland Drive spoke in support of the variances. She said that she is
a soccer mom and a high school teacher. She also said that most of the traffic will occur in the
evenings and on weekends and will not draw as much traffic as it might seem.
Board of Zoning Appeals Minutes April 10, 2025 Page 2
__________________________________________________________________________________
David Ames, applicant’s representative, stated that he is an owner, operator and
building of sports dome and they are insulated to buffer the noise. He said that the noise
from meter/generator could only be heard when standing right next to it and it is located
on the back of the building.
IV. PUBLIC HEARING/ACTION
A. BZA-4095.25, 1801 E. Miller Road and adjoining vacant parcel, Variances to the
building height limitation, allowable building materials and mechanical equipment
in the front yard.
Ms. Stachowiak announced that the public hearing was held at the March 13, 2025,
meeting at which Stacy Lynch of 6101 Scotmar Drive spoke in opposition to the request
expressing concerns about the traffic that would be generated by the proposed sports
complex and about the appearance of the dome.
Ms. Stachowiak stated that this is a request for variances to permit a 67-foot, 2 inch
high, domed indoor soccer building, that would be constructed of vinyl coated polyester
and an entry building that would be constructed of metal panels at 1801 E. Miller Road
and the adjoining vacant property. She further stated that the staff recommendation is
to deny the request as the proposed building may have a negative impact on future
development in the area and on property values, particularly with regard to the
residential uses to the south. She said that, as evidenced by the renderings included in
the packet, the proposed dome is massive and will dramatically change the
character/appearance of the area, in direct conflict with the goals of the Master Plan and
with the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. Ms. Stachowiak said that granting
the requested variances under these circumstances would set a negative precedent for
future variance requests where approval thereof would be contrary to the guiding and
regulatory documents related thereto.
Mr. Fryling asked about the dome that collapsed in East Lansing.
Mark Bigelbach, applicant’s representative, stated that it had to have been an error on
the part of the operator.
The Board members discussed the inability to construct an indoor sports complex in
compliance with the City’s architectural standards and softening the view of the dome
by planting dense rows of trees and shrubs in front of the building and in front of the
parking lot
Mr. Berryman asked about the hours of operation and whether the amount of parking
will be adequate to accommodate the demand.
Mr. Bigelbach stated that the hours are typically from 5-10 during the week and during
the daytime on weekends.
Ms. Stachowiak stated that the number of parking spaces meets the code requirement
Board of Zoning Appeals Minutes April 10, 2025 Page 3
__________________________________________________________________________________
for the projected occupancy load. She also said that there is a zoning ordinance
amendment pending before the City Council that would increase the allowable height
for structures in the industrial zoning direct to 60 feet which would reduce the variance
to 7 feet, 2 inches as opposed to 22 feet, inches. She said that there has been no
objection to the amendment, and she anticipates that it will be approved within 30-45
days. Ms. Stachowiak also stated that if the site had greater depth so that the building
would be located at least 200 feet from the front property line, it would not have to
comply with the architectural requirements.
Mr. Rice stated that he will not be voting in favor of the variances as the building is
contrary to the intent of the ordinance which is to regulate building design and materials
so that buildings improve the appearance of the streetscape and fit in with the area in
which they are located. He said that he doesn’t have concerns about traffic and noise
but is concerned about preserving the intent of the ordinance.
Mr. Lowry pointed out that there is already a domed structure in the area. He also
pointed out that the variance to the height limitation would be minimal under the
proposed ordinance amendment and thus, denial of the variances would create an
unnecessary hardship on the applicant.
Mr. Iannuzzi spoke in support of the request stating that the height variance would be
minimal and is necessary because of the unique circumstance of it being a domed
structure.
Mr. Fryling stated that he could support the variances as long as a substantial amount of
shrubs and tress will be planted to soften the view of the building and only if the
amendment allowing for an increased building height is approved by the City Council,
thus reducing the variance to 7 feet, 2 inches.
Mr. Iannuzzi made a motion, seconded by Mr. Lowry to approve BZA 4095.25 for
variances to Sections 1245.04.02(A) and 1246.04.03(c) of the Zoning Ordinance to permit
a 67-foot, 2-inch high, domed, indoor soccer building constructed of vinyl coated polyester
and an entry building constructed of metal panels on the property at 1801 E. Miller Road
and the adjoining vacant parcel, based upon the findings described in the staff report
regarding compliance with variance evaluation criteria listed in Sections 1274.06 (c) & (e)
of the Ordinance.
Mr. Fryling made a motion, seconded by Mr. Jackson to amend the motion to add a
condition of approval that the applicant install a dense row of evergreen trees and shrubs
in the area south of the building and parking lot and that the variance to the height
restriction is limited to 7 feet, 2 inches which requires approval of the ordinance
amendment increasing the allow building height to 60 feet. Mr. Iannuzzi and Mr. Lowry
accepted the amendments.
On a roll call vote, the motion, as amended, carried 7-1. Mr. Rice cast the dissenting vote.
V. OLD BUSINESS – None
VI. NEW BUSINESS – None
Board of Zoning Appeals Minutes April 10, 2025 Page 4
__________________________________________________________________________________
VII. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular Meeting March 13, 2025
Mr. Jackson made a motion, seconded by Mr. Iannuzzi to approve the regular
meeting minutes for March 13, 2025, as presented. On a voice vote, the motion
carried unanimously (8-0)
VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT - None
IX. ADJOURNMENT AT 7:32 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
__________________________________________
Susan Stachowiak, Zoning Administrator