Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Glenburne Environmental Assessment
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SINGLE FAMILY NEW CONSTRUCTION FOUR (4) VACANT LOTS GLENBURNE BLVD . SOUTHWEST LANSING CITY OF LANSING DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING 316 N. CAPITOL LANSING, MI 48933 U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development 451 Seventh Street,SW Washington,DC 20410 _,vanaI.^L•CI.210V Assessment . Deter.���on ations and Comp anCe Findings for HUD-assisted Projects 24 CFR Part 58 Project Information Project name: New-Construction HERDS number: 900000010074898 Responsible Entity (RE): LANSING, DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DIRECTOR LANSING MI, 48933 RE Preparer: Doris Witherspoon State/ Local Identifier: Michigan Certifying Officer: Andy Schor Grant Recipient (if different than Responsible Ent ity): Point of Contact: Consultant (if applicabl e): Point of Contact: Project Location: Glenburne Blvd, Lansing, MI Additional Location Information: Propose 4 new lots on Glenburne Blvd Direct Comments to: New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Description,of the Proposed Project [24 CFR 50.12 & 58.32;40 CFR 1508.25]: New Construction'-Vacant property on Glenburne Blvd. Permanent Parcel Numbers: 23-50-40-36-32.9-121 Lot 322 23-50-40-36-407-041 Lot 324 23-50-40-36-329-071 Lot 317 23-50-40-36-407-051 Lot 325 This project will focus on the construction of 4 new single family homes for sale to homebuyers and will model the energy efficiency, design and amenities that characterize the type of future new housing development that best fits Lansing's urban neighborhood properties. Funds will be available for projects to be purchased by households with income at or below 80%of area median income. Construction will take place on previously developed lots in single-family residential areas. More specifically, this project involves the new construction of single -- - - family.homes, o.ne on each lot on-Gaenburne Blvd in Southwest Lansing in Eaton Count. Each lot will contain a single-family home with 3 bedrooms and at least 1.5 baths and a full basement and will be made available to income qualified homebuyers using Down Payment Assistance through HOME funds of approximately $225,000 per house will be invested in the project along with funds from the CHDO Statement of Purpose and Need for the Proposal [40 CFR 1508.9(b)]: The purpose and need for the proposal of affordable single family homes have been identified in the City of Lansing's Consolidated/Action Plan. To meet this need, this project will focus on the construction of four single family homes which will be for sale to income qualified homebuyers using down payment assistance funding through the HOME program. The City of Lansing will continue to address the housing and community development needs of its residents. Existing Conditions and Trends [24 CFR 58.40(a)]: The existing conditions and trends consist of single family homes in a residential neighborhood. Currently, there are four vacant lots proposed for new construction development on Glenburne Blvd. in Southwest Lansing, MI. The trends likely to continue in the absence of the project is the development of single family affordable homes.. Maps, photographs, and other documentation of project location and description: iVMapofGL enburne - Propc)sed New Constructioqs�dt Determination: Finding of No Significant Impact [24 CFR 58.40(g)(1); 40 CFR 1508.13] The project will not result in a significant impact on the quality of human environment Finding of Significant Impact Approval Documents: 7015.15 certified by Certifying Officer on: 7015.16 certified by Authorizing Officer on: 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 2 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Funding Information Grant/ Project HUD Program Program Name Identification Number Community Planning and MC2600205 Development (CPD) HOME Program - - Estimated Total HUD Funded, $649,108.00 Assisted or Insured Amount: Estimated Total Project Cost [24 CFR 58.2 (a) $900,456.00 MI: Compliance with 24 CFR§50.4, §58.5 and §58.6 Laws and Authorities Compliance Factors: Are formal Compliance determination Statutes, Executive Orders, and compliance steps (See Appendix A for source Regulations listed at 24 CFR §50.4, or mitigation determinations) §58.5, and §58.6 required? STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS,AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR§50.4&§ 58.6 Airport Hazards ❑ Yes Q No The project site is not within 15,000 feet Clear Zones and Accident Potential of a military airport or 2,500 feet of a Zones; 24 CFR Part 51 Subpart D civilian airport.The project is in compliance with Airport Hazards requirements. Coastal Barrier Resources Act ❑ Yes Q No This project is not located in a CBRS Coastal Barrier Resources Act, as Unit.Therefore,this project has no amended by the Coastal Barrier potential to impact a CBRS Unit and is in Improvement Act of 1990 [16 USC compliance with the Coastal Barrier 3501] Resources Act. Flood Insurance ❑ Yes Q No Based on the project description the Flood Disaster Protection Act of project includes no activities that would 1973 and National Flood Insurance require further evaluation under this Reform Act of 1994 [42 USC 4001- section.The project does not require 4128 and 42 USC 5154a] flood insurance or is excepted from flood insurance. While flood insurance may not be mandatory in this instance, HUD recommends that all insurable structures maintain flood insurance 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 3 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).The project is in compliance withiFlood Insurance requirements. STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS,AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR§50.4&§58.5 Air Quality ❑ Yes fQ No The project's county or air quality Clean Air Act, as amended, management district is in attainment particularly section 176(c) & (d); 40 status for all criteria pollutants.The CFR Parts 6, 51, 93 project is in compliance with the Clean _......_. . Air A c1: __...__..._._. . Coastal Zone Management Act ❑ Yes Q No This project is not located in or does not Coastal Zone Management Act, affect a Coastal Zone as defined in the sections 307(c) & (d) state Coastal Management Plan.The project is in compliance with the Coastal Zone Management Act. Contamination and Toxic ❑ Yes ✓❑ No On-site or nearby toxic, hazardous,or Substances radioactive substances that could affect 24 CFR 50.3(i) &58.5(i)(2)j the health and safety of project occupants or conflict with the intended use of the property were not found.The project is in compliance with contamination and toxic substances requirements. Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes Q No This project will have No Effect on listed Endangered Species Act of 1973, species because there are no listed particularly section 7; 50 CFR Part species or designated critical habitats in 402 the action area.This project is in compliance with the Endangered Species Act. Explosive and Flammable Hazards ❑ Yes Q No There are no current or planned Above-Ground Tanks)[24 CFR Part stationary aboveground storage 51 Subpart C containers of concern within 1 mile of the project site.The project is in compliance with explosive and flammable hazard requirements. Farmlands Protection ❑ Yes ✓❑ No This project includes activities that Farmland Protection Policy Act of could potentially convert agricultural 1981, particularly sections 1504(b) land to a non-agricultural use, but an and 1541; 7 CFR Part 658 exemption applies.The project is in compliance with the Farmland Protection Policy Act. Floodplain Management ❑ Yes Q No The following exception applies,so the Executive Order 11988, particularly project is in compliance with Executive section 2(a); 24 CFR Part 55 Order 11988: 55.12(c)(3),The approval of financial assistance for restoring and 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 4 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, Mi 900000010074898 preserving the natural and beneficial functions and values of floodplains and wetlands, including through acquisition Of such floodplain and wetlands property, but only if:(i)The property is cleared of all existing structures and related improvements;(ii)The property is dedicated for permanent use for flood control, wetlands protection,park land, or.open space; and (iii) A permanent_ covenant or comparable restriction is placed on the property's continued use to preserve the floodplain or wetlands from future development. Historic Preservation ❑ Yes ❑ No National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, particularly sections 106 and 110; 36 CFR Part 800 Noise Abatement and Control ❑ Yes ✓❑ No The Preliminary Screening identified no Noise Control Act of 1972, as noise generators in the vicinity of the amended by the Quiet Communities project.The project is in compliance Act of 1978; 24 CFR Part 51 Subpart with HUD's Noise regulation. B Sole Source Aquifers ❑ Yes Q No The project is not located on a sole Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as source aquifer area.The project is in amended, particularly section compliance with Sole Source Aquifer 1424(e);40 CFR Part 149 requirements. Wetlands Protection ❑ Yes 121 No The project will not impact on-or off- Executive Order 11990, particularly site wetlands.The project is in sections 2 and 5 compliance with Executive Order 11990. Wild and Scenic Rivers Act ❑ Yes Q No This project is not within proximity of a Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968, NWSRS river. The project is in particularly section 7(b) and (c) compliance with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. HUD HOUSING ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE Environmental Justice ❑ Yes 0 No No adverse environmental impacts were Executive Order 12898 identified in the project's total environmental review.The project is in compliance with Executive Order 12898. Environmental Assessment Factors [24 CFR 58.40; Ref. 40 CFR 1508.8 &1508.271 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 5 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Impact Codes: An impact code from the following list has been used to make the determination of impact for each factor. (1) Minor beneficial impact (2) No impact anticipated (3) Minor Adverse Impact—May require mitigation (4) Significant or potentially significant impact requiring avoidance or modification which may require an Environmental Impact Statement. Environmental Impact Code Impact Evaluation Mitigation Assessment Factor LAND DEVELOPMENT SOCIOECONOMIC COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES NATURAL FEATURES Supporting documentation Transportation and Accessibility.pdf Parks-Schools-River Trail.pdf Natural Features-Water Resources.pdf Economic Development.pdf Conformance with Zonin,.pdf Additional Studies Performed: No additional studies were performed Field Inspection [Optional]: Date and completed by: MapofGLenburne - Proposed New Construction(002) Pdf List of Sources,Agencies and Persons Consulted [40 CFR 1508.9(b)]: State Historical Preservation Office Correspondence, Five (5)Tribal Historic Preservation Offices City of Lansing Master Plan (Design Lansing 2012), Planning Office, Transportation Office, FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map, Google maps, Worksheets pertaining to the related laws and authorities including: Airport Hazards, Air Quality, Coastal Barrier Resources, Coastal Zone Management, Endangered Species, Environmental Justice, Explosive and Flammable Facilities, Farmland Protection, Flood Insurance and Management, Noise Abatement, Site Contamination, Sole Source Aquifers, Wetland Protection, Wild and Scenic Rivers 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 6 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 List of Permits Obtained: Proper permits such as building permits will be obtained for the new construction project on Clenburne Blvd. Public Outreach [24 CFR 58.43]: Information will be placed in the local newspaper, City Pulse as well as e-mail/mailed to more than 250 housing and community development organizations nUBLIC NQTICE -FONSIRROF-T?EW CQNSTUCTIQ" -4 Lots.QJFNBURNE BLVD..doc Cumulative Impact Analysis [24 CFR 58.321: There is no meaningful impact as a result of the proposed new construction.The nature and size of this project should result in no or minimal impacts on the environment. The population increase, as a result of the new construction, is minimal and will have a negligible impact on school capacity, road systems, public services, traffic-related noise generation, etc. There are no current or anticipated major developments in the project area that would generate traffic congestion or related noise, or other adverse impacts on the project. Alternatives [24 CFR 58.40(e); 40 CFR 1508.91 N/A No Action Alternative [24 CFR 58.40(e)] The only alternative is not to build any additional housing of this type. However, there is a documented need (i.e. minutes of public hearings), for affordable and safe-housing in the City of Lansing and the proposed project will address this need. Summary of Findings and Conclusions: Based on the above information, the proposed project as designed will not result in a significant impact on the quality of the human environment.The proposed new development should have a or positive environmental effect on the City of Lansing. Mitigation Measures and Conditions [CFR 1505.2(c)]: Summarized below are all mitigation measures adopted by the Responsible Entity to reduce, avoid or eliminate adverse environmental impacts and to avoid non-compliance or non- conformance with the above-listed authorities and factors.These measures/conditions must be incorporated into project contracts, development agreements and other relevant documents. The staff responsible for implementing and monitoring mitigation measures should be clearly identified in the mitigation plan. 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 7 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Law, Mitigation Measure or Condition Comments on Complete Authority, or Completed Measures Factor Permits, Proper permits such as building permits reviews and will be obtained for the new construction N/A approvals project on Glenburne Blvd. Mitigation Plan Awaiting comments from THPO, one has indicated no adverse impacts. Anticipate that there are - no adverse impacts associated with h.istoric.-preservation.-In.reference to related laws and authority- all will be adhered to for the new construction project including obtaining the proper permits associated with all aspects of the proposed new construction. Supporting documentation on completed measures 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 8 of 35 EX y'i-flN(75 i_AND U 5 E >Design Lansing 2012 Comprehensive Plan • L _... Existing Land Use . Multi Family """ R - _ Single Family _ Y,. at •st I'I 't—� r� .[ Group&Transient Quarters ( a ':_ �- � ! �4Av�i r .s.l , dlt b t ICI r'Yli 31 j _ 3 ,• C'.. f • t Commercial y .»w.�., • � s f JI Public Institutional Industrial Illl . Warehousing Transportation / 'tic- :.�+_ —.�~' "•""r ' Utilities ; � I 1 �•• ..I {`9 Z ' S _ tL"t" Streams e Parks - �u Vacant ; ►:i— .:�. ,,,.W..31 .� �,' �, A. I�_, •+ate•_ R,.K .. i a�\ i t , L 150 co rn FUturoland U.-Jo CIassI icaiPon3 o in pit ��-�,1'•,.�I_I.Vt'�I',r)r+...:n•v et�.-..i-,• .�. i /••Y +` `� � ..-•� , tt /l ; fs .16 I r_. Figure 8-1:5 Future Land Use Plan DESIGN LANSIiNG 2012 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ''"'�•` f; '�' •I �:i �_; °-�- ';� _,.-,,tea°'"� � t ., I•• •I .L ' 4 r S ILILI J <.' �. i i 1 l •.J J ' Ifl 4J -' ''•1 ' I'J a'.I r�I r.J •I .I 'i •i tl '•I (; 1 �� i'J F �1 3 '.J •1 C �� �j � T ''1 ,t •1 �j !I N �.I .cm ell ' '•1 i, �- C cu t N 1 ' o:) r r cu z 1` co t a J o I t_ ••I n r-J 7 1 ,, r•{ C) "-' w m v n u •o r• E � L •I X rli C Q) 3 m c a - n \� o eJ 3 t Q. d i•1 (Q E 0 U tll U 10 fn IZ (D E of c n � N c o m O d ' L t r cc a N Q Q G G \ 3 rnrn U L c 5 , m � c c .a. O m fQ fn N C O C O C C C L a 'O w cr m cc0i E E ° c a ID w aco w zTcjmC^ (0 a° a a L) o d o o p 0 ui L5 LL LL oo�a�o�� a Edni:p,rha=ands-rema.m-p�ar--I �. .. . ..,•..,,...,, i:5%� =1e;: _-1a '2%'?._,- :J I�1!!Ir 'I�Gianlir•1��!a.oli.!�!iYtlto IG I�(i:,��I�:in�:.};fla 7-L� -. A Glenoume81d, ansing.L11.-1� .`Iqi .�}� �� ^� n e `, � �•, ;o,K� ttb�Ef�f•�� �- _,� 1+ t SI __ -� °arGLrL•urr-81.. '4.�c .• 0 -. M _ . I illnl,l rcahlul ,l!xl•Ila .,--, ?' , 1 _ I �1�;iu1'I{n� .�g� t• �o — t� e t al� 01 4 � � - 'p ;,fGl ,lla l.lhl LIIL7,L[I, � � c l'Ili+'�U��iL;llltilll'� ._... r^" •- ��Y .. f,% °�^�i+c ti uF�a F t:'•ill In fAI FO''9L HAD 41;.nl L ui m , es 1 - h r • ....- 'i cur -,n,r._ - _ :ii I- � I TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS >Design Lansing 2012 Comprehensive Plan 7ranspormtion Analysis W 001,14-Al; W 0—St ——————"— —— VT VAJAM �All,9 6 L rr w—.1 f W Jvlh RC T .1 d Mt--,U Y14 PARM'S, SCHOOLS, - MVER TRAIL >Desicin Lansing 2012 Comprehensive Plan Park Type Cemetery V�oul..M. C—.Urity Carter Ws al.v'"S— Golf C.U.. Park Z ParklSpeclal w1f.— Public School Property Other School Property —River Trail Expansio n —U39ng Rl- f Trail • -4 P. a fj F-- 41 oa r t7 q AG49L Will...bby d jj W, Core habitat areas for plants and animals,including rare or endangered C) species,pollinators and seed banks. • Stormwater infiltration and water quality protection. Figure 5 1: Potential Natural • Air quality filtering. Resource Areas • Natural areas for recreation and learning. Preservat. seas—Undeveloped r • Access to nature close to home. I lands with higher quality woodland As described above;Lansing's natural systems were evaluated to identify ? or wetland vegetation that contain significant environmental resources that provide some or all of these benefits.3 In larger areas of core habitat. These may some cases,these areas are dedicated park space and already protected. In other include sensitive,but unprotected, = cases,they are lands in public ownership or private property. (See sidebar for list sites,as well as protected sites(i.e., of natural resource areas.) public parks). L 1. Sycamore Delta Natural Area (includes.Fenner Arb.,Scott Woods,Crego and Schubel Parks) c 2. Willoughby Park Natural Area T " 3. Wexford Park Natural Area U j 4, Fine Park Natural Area 5. Kimberly Park Natural Area - ( ! Conservation Areas—Sites with a t ` — to J mixture of development and significant ',,;.;• ,�___, woodland or wetland vegetation. Future development should be planned to minimize the disturbance of,and ' impacts,on natural features. 6. Techumseh Park Natural Area _ .•_ ,�; �` -ti• i.7 7. Forest View Natural Area _1:• - z._ 8. Wood Creek Natural Area /f 9. Davis Park Natural Area 10. Marscot Natural Area Restoration Areas—Sites that have strong restoration potential due to proximity to other natural resource areas and/or large undeveloped parcels. (• �f ` I I j; `t l 11. Red Cedar/Urbandale Natural _ Area 12. Coachlight Natural Area j - 13. Washington-MLK Natural Area 14. East Airport Natural Area —` Note that many of these natural areas are named after nearby parks,but the extent of the natural area may include areas beyond the park. DESIGN LANSING 2012 COMPREHENSIVE PLa411 Collaborate. The Lansing Economic Area Partnership's research shows that the metropolitan areas that have been most successful in attracting business and increasing jobs _ are those that have approached economic development as a coordinated regional _o initiative. It is also clear that a strong central city can work to the economic advantage its region. The factors that have been shown to attract the new - economy talent pool play to Lansing's existing strengths and will become the ' r•, focus of future efforts to encourage mixed use. u r a U X S Neighborhood Scale Mixed-use Core {-- - Village Scale Mixed-use Care ❑ Community Scale .�•ii -- 'I }�.._..._.._.' ! f�� Mixed-Use Cores r .•i 1� Regional Scale .t r i r -.�• 1 Mixed-Use Cores Transition Districts Knowledge I Tech Economy Oriented Workplaces Manufacturing/Industrial 1 - �7 �, _ Oriented Workplaces u _�'• ; - Urban transformation corridor ,+ (connectors) 71 _�.I ) �• '�. Suburban transformation torrid (connectors) it 7 n _!-:�. / N� 1/2 mile walk radius k; from potential J r i _ !, I neighborhood and villages cores. l :ors — Figure 2-1:Economic 1�—� ` •— ,,. -��" Development Concepts ` for Change Plan. This interim product identified desired change areas and u future land use based on community input. DES!GN LANSING 2012 l.OMPRCHENSIVE PLAN! JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM . M1.71 ' MICHIGAN MI-74 LAKE SU PER IaR rill-66 �UII-65 M MI-64*MI-63 MI-53 W,,I,,-52 MI-51 'MI-62 MI-55. _ MI-49 MI;59 M,1-34MI-35 MI-33 MI-36 MI-32�A„ rM 1-38 MI-31 MI-39 MI-41 MI-43 MI-44 rill-29 MI 46 MI-28 MI-31 MI-42 MI-45 "MI-25 h11-40 'MI-24 MI.17° a MI-14 "MI-13 LIKE ( RU1 MI-20- MI-21` r.,a KE MI-08 MI-06 Jf I C tt t GA N 0 MI-0,.7 MI-05 MI-22' Nu nber of CBRS Units: 46 Number of System Units: 46 Number of Otherwise Protected Areas: 0 Total Acres: 14,713 Upland Acres: 5,187 °MI-04 Associated Aquatic HabitatAcres: 9.526 MI-03 Shoreline Miles: 61 MI.02 Boundaries of the John H.Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System(CBRS)shown on this map were transferred from the official CBRS maps for this area and are depicted on this map(in red)for informational purposes only. The official CBRS maps are enacted by Congress via the Coastal Barrier Resources Act, as amended, and are maintained by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The official CBRS maps are available for download at http://www.fws.gov/habitatconservation/coastal_barder.html. Noise Deternii anion ;r heck.11st Acld ess 4 Vacant lots on Glenburne Blvd. (To be completed only for federally-assisted housing projects located within 1000 ft. of a roadway, 3000 ft. of an active railway, 3 miles of a civil airport or 15 miles of a military airfield.) 1. Is.the unit-within 1,000 feet from a major roadway? O Yes o . 2. Is the unit within 3,000 feet from an active railway? C1 Yes XNo 3. Is.the unit within 3 miles of a civil airport or 15 miles of a military airfield? 17 Yes �No If any answers are yes, complete a Day/Night Noise Level (DNL) Assessment. DNL Level: If DNL Assessment Level is less than 65 decibels than project can proceed with no mitigation required. If DNL Assessment Level is more than 65 decibels than conduct a Sound Transmission Classification Assessment Tool (STraCAT) to determine interior sound. STraCAT Results: If STraCAT level is below 45 decibels, project may proceed. Prepared by: Doris M. Witherspoon, Senior Planner U Glenburne Blvd, Lansing, MI 48911 to Old U.S. 27, DeWitt Tw... Page I of I Glenburne Blvd, Lansing, Ml 48911 to Old Drive 20.5 miles,23 min U.S. 27, DeWitt Twp, VII At —.7 A— Vs —7n .—.ZrJl it J" -'TAR� 'v--j 0 2S 1 %I z 7, Imagery @2019 Landsat Copernicus,NOAA,Map data @2019 Google 10 mi via US-1 27 N Fastest route,the usual traffic 20.5 miles via 1-69 N 22-7 miles via 1-96 E and US-1 27 N - 25.2 miles https://www.goc!gle.com/mal)s/dir/Glenburne+Blvd.+Lansine..+... 1/18/2019 Four Vacant lots on Glenburne Blvd. The-City of Lansing Transportation Office evaluated the request for traffic information on the major street,Waverly Road, which is in close proximity to the proposed new construction development on Glenburne Blvd. More specifically parcel numbers for the four(4) vacant lots: 23-50-40-36-329-121(Lot 322); 23-50-40-36-407-041(Lot 324); 23-50-40-36-329-071 (Lot 317); 23-50-40-36-407-051 (Lot 325); They determined the following: South of Holmes Road and north of Glenburne: Average Daily Traffic (ADT) is approximately 20,000 Vehicles per day(VPD) North of Jolly Rd south of Glenburne: the volumes are nearly identical. Counts were taken in 2007 at 18,000.Growth rate used of.01%over 11 years. Historical data indicated a high of 28,000'in 2003. Volumes throughout the city dropped in 2005 when the housing crisis really hit and the economy went downhill. The traffic volumes have been steadily increasing. -7 -T er IN ,f." ,LLI %.I o e IL-I .r S,cj -r yr ICI Cj Ll LJ r V-3 -T 67 v Ill F,'-J —M 4R v, k-j co In IN cr) co co LLI In In 0 ca ao ij CY) :,nTT 'D co co M '0 (D CL p- m -0 0) Q- 42 E 0 q vi ol p C9 (n CL c 'Fn '4K M14W.I.V, I I I I IL—L J--i I 1/ r \/y \1 I i-___1_ - �o,,�:d� fin— — --- -0 aa� a �• s ;� ti r: / Ir 1, 1 >., 4 j`s r 1 J1 / 7 f STATE OF MICHIGAN RICK SNYDER MICHIGAN STATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EARL J. POLESKI GOVERNOR STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR November 14,2018 ` '))=;, =J i/r7.- I-1 BARB KIMMEL CITY OF LANSING 316 N CAPITOL AVENUE SUITE MI 48933 LANSING DEVELOPMENT OFFICE RE: ER19-37 Glenburne Lot 317 New Home Construction,Sec.36,T4N,R3W,Delta Township, Eaton County(HUD) Dear Ms. Kimmel: Under the authority of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966,as amended,we have reviewed the above-cited undertaking at the location noted above. Based on the information provided for our review,it is the opinion of the State Historic Preservation Officer(SHPO)that no historic properties are affected within the area of potential effects of this undertaking. Please note for future consultation with our office that all projects with ground-disturbing activities,you must include the Township,Range and Section information for the area affected by the project.Additionally,when identifying the Municipal unit you must specify the city,village,or township where the project is located.The municipal unit is notthe mailing address of the project location. It appears that this project is located not within the city limits of Lansing,but rather Delta Township. You should also understand that under Section 106, historic properties are NRHP-listed or eligible buildings,structures, objects,sites,etc.-including archaeological sites,and districts.The submitted application did not address the identification of,or potential for,archaeological properties.The State Archaeological Site File at SHPO is the official record of archaeological properties in Michigan.Applicants/consultants should investigate both above-ground and archaeological historic site files when preparing project application. Email SHPOresearch@michigan.gov to access these files and note that a research visit to our office may be required.Research appointments may be made by contacting us a week in advance, Future applications that fail to provide adequate location information will be returned for additional information and the review period will be accordingly reset.SHPO staff does not conduct research on behalf of others during Section 106. This letter evidences HUD's compliance with 36 CFR§800.4"Identification of historic properties,"and the fulfillment of HUD's responsibility to notify the SHPO,as a consulting party in the Section 106 process, under 36 CFR§800.4(d)(1)"No historic properties affected."9f the scope of work changes in any way,or if artifacts or bones are discovered,please notify this office immediately. We remind you that federal agency officials or their delegated authorities are required to involve the public in a manner that reflects the nature and complexity of the undertaking and its effects on historic properties per 36 CFR§800.2(d). The National Historic Preservation Act also requires that federal agencies consult with any Indian tribe and/or Tribal Historic Preservation Officer(THPO)that attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties that may be affected by the agency's undertakings per 36 CFR§800.2(c)(2)(ii). The State Historic Preservation Office is not the office of record for this undertaking. You are therefore asked to maintain a copy of this letter with your environmental review record for this undertaking. 16. State Historic Preservation Office 735 EAST MICHIGAN AVENUE•PO BOX 30044•IANSING,MICHIGAN 48909 www.michivan.00v/shoo• 517-373-1630•FAX 517-335-0348 If you have any questions,please contact Brian Grennell,Cultural Resource Management Specialist,at 517-335-2721 or by email at GrennellB@michigan.gov. Please reference our project number in all communication with this office regarding this undertaking. Thank you for this opportunity to review and comment,and for your cooperation. Sincerely, Brian G.Grerfne I Cultural Resodce Management Specialist for Brian D.Conway State Historic Preservation Officer SAT:BGG Copy: Carmen Reveron,HUD Emma Henry,Capital Area Housing Partnership STATE OF MICHIGAN RICK SNYDER MICHIGAN STATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EARL J. POLESKI GOVERNOR STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR November 14,2018 BARB KIMMEL CITY OF LANSING 316 N CAPITOL AVENUE SUITE D-1 LANSING MI 48933 RE: ER19-36 Glenburne Lot 322 New Home Construction,Sec.36,T4N,R3W, Delta Township, Eaton County(HUD) Dear Ms. Kimmel: Under the authority of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966,as amended,we have reviewed the above-cited undertaking at the location noted above. Based on the information provided for our review, it is the opinion of the State Historic Preservation Officer(SHPO)that no historic properties are affected within the area of potential effects of this undertaking. Please note for future consultation with our office that all projects with ground-disturbing activities,you must include the Township,Range and Section information for the area affected by the project.Additionally,when identifying the Municipal unit you must specify the city,village,or township where the project is located .The municipal unit is notthe mailing address of the project location. It appears that this project is located not within the city limits of Lansing,but rather Delta Township. You should also understand that under Section 106, historic properties are NRHP-listed or eligible buildings,structures, objects,sites, etc.-including archaeological sites,and districts.The submitted application did not address the identification of,or potential for, archaeological properties.The State Archaeological Site File at SHPO is the official record of archaeological properties in Michigan.Applicants/consultants should investigate both above-ground and archaeological historic site files when preparing project application. Email SHPOresearch@michigan.gov to access these files and note that a research visit to our office may be required.Research appointments may be made by contacting us a week in advance.Future applications that fail to provide adequate location information will be returned for additional information and the review period will be accordingly reset.SHPO staff does not conduct research on behalf of others during Section 106. This letter evidences HUD's compliance with 36 CFR§800.4"Identification of historic properties,"and the fulfillment of HUD's responsibility to notify the SHPO,as a consulting party in the Section 106 process, under 36 CFR§800.4(d)(1)"No historic properties affected."If the scope of work changes in any way,or if artifacts or bones are discovered,please notify this office immediately. We remind you that federal agency officials or their delegated authorities are required to involve the public in a manner that reflects the nature and complexity of the undertaking and its effects an historic properties per 36 CFR§800.2(d). The National Historic Preservation Act also requires that federal agencies consult with any Indian tribe and/or Tribal Historic Preservation Officer(THPO)that attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties that may be affected by the agency's undertakings per 36 CFR§800.2(c)(2)(ii). The State Historic Preservation Office is not the office of record for this undertaking. You are therefore asked to maintain a copy of this letter with your environmental review record for this undertaking. State Historic Preservation Office 735 EAST MICHIGAN AVENUE ,PO BOX 30044•LANSING,MICHIGAN 48909 If you have any questions,please contact Brian Grennell,Cultural Resource Management Specialist,at 517-335-2721 or by email at GrennellB@michigan.gov. Please reference our project number in all communication with this office regarding this undertaking. Thank you for this opportunity to review and comment,and for your cooperation. Sincerely, Brian G.Gren II Cultural Reso ce angg. ment Specialist for Brian D.Conway State Historic Preservation Officer SAT:BGG Copy: Carmen Reveron,HUD Emma Henry,Capital Area Housing Partnership J 1M STATE OF MICHIGAN RICK SNYDER MICHIGAN STATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EARL J. POLESKI GOVERNOR STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR November 14,2018 BARB KIMMEL CITY OF LANSING 316 N CAPITOL AVENUE SUITE D-1 LANSING MI 48933 RE: ER19-34 Glenburne Lot 324 New Home Construction,Sec.36,T4N,R3W, Delta Township,Eaton County(HUD) Dear Ms. Kimmel: Under the authority of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966,as amended,we have reviewed the above-cited undertaking at the location noted above. Based on the information provided for our review, it is the opinion of the State Historic Preservation Officer(SHPO)that no historic properties are affected within the area of potential effects of this undertaking. Please note for future consultation with our office that all projects with ground-disturbing activities,you must include the Township,Range and Section information for the area affected by the project.Additionally,when identifying the Municipal unit you must specify the city,village,or township where the project is located .The municipal unit is notthe mailing address of the project location. It appears that this project is located not within the city limits of Lansing,but rather Delta Township. You should also understand that under Section 106, historic properties are NRHP-listed or eligible buildings,structures, objects,sites,etc.-including archaeological sites,and districts.The submitted application did not address the identification of,or potential for,archaeological properties.The State Archaeological Site File at SHPO is the official record of archaeological properties in Michigan.Applicants/consultants should investigate both above-ground and archaeological historic site files when preparing project application. Email SHPOresearchC@michigan.gov to access these files and note that a research visit to our office may be required. Research appointments may be made by contacting us a week in advance.Future applications that fail to provide adequate location information will be returned for additional information and the review period will be accordingly reset.SHPO staff does not conduct research on behalf of others during Section 106. This letter evidences HUD's compliance with 36 CFR§800.4"Identification of historic properties,"and the fulfillment of HUD's responsibility to notify the SHPO,as a consulting party in the Section 106 process,under 36 CFR§800.4(d)(1)"No historic properties affected."If the scope of work changes in any way,or if artifacts or bones are discovered,please notify this office immediately. We remind you that federal agency officials or their delegated authorities are required to involve the public in a manner that reflects the nature and complexity of the undertaking and its effects on historic properties per 36 CFR§800.2(d). The National Historic Preservation Act also requires that federal agencies consult with any Indian tribe and/or Tribal Historic Preservation Officer(THPO)that attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties that may be affected by the agency's undertakings per 36 CFR§800.2(c)(2)(ii). The State Historic Preservation Office is not the office of record for this undertaking. You are therefore asked to maintain a copy of this letter with your environmental review record for this undertaking. 61 State Historic Preservation Office I ing 735 EAST MICHIGAN AVENUE•PO BOX 30044•LANSING,MICHIGAN 48909 '"�" www.michigan.gov/shpo• 517-373-1630•FAX 51 7-335-034B If you have any questions,please contact Brian Grennell,Cultural Resource Management Specialist,at 517-335-2721 or by email at GrennellB@michigan.gov. Please reference our project number in all communication with this office regarding this undertaking. Thank you for this opportunity to review and comment, and for your cooperation. Sincerely, Brian G.Gren 'ell Cultural Reso ce M na Lent Specialist �� g P for Brian D.Conway State Historic Preservation Officer SAT:BGG Copy: Carmen Reveron,HUD Emma Henry,Capital Area Housing Partnership STATE OF MICHIGAN RICK SNYDER MICHIGAN STATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY GOVERNOR STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE E EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ARL J. I November 14,2018 BARB KIMMEL CITY OF LANSING -- - 316 N CAPITOL AVENUE SUITED-1 LANSING MI 48933 RE: ER19-33 Glenburne Lot 325 New Home Construction,Sec.36,T4N, R3W,Delta Township,Eaton County(HUD) Dear Ms. Kimmel: Under the authority of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966,as amended,we have reviewed the above-cited undertaking at the location noted above. Based on the information provided for our review, it is the opinion of the State Historic Preservation Officer(SHPO)that no historic properties are affected within the area of potential effects of this undertaking. Please note for future consultation with our office that all projects with ground-disturbing activities,you must include the Township, Range and Section information for the area affected by the project.Additionally,when identifying the Municipal unit you must specify the city,-village,or township where the project is located.The municipal unit is not the mailing address of the project location. It appears that this project is located not within the city limits of Lansing,but rather Delta Township. You should also understand that under Section 106, historic properties are NRHP-listed or eligible buildings,structures, objects,sites,etc.-including archaeological sites,and districts.The submitted application did not address the identification of, or potential for,archaeological properties.The State Archaeological Site File at SHPO is the official record of archaeological properties in Michigan.Applicants/consultants should investigate both above-ground and archaeological historic site files when preparing project application. Email SHPOresearch0michigan gov to access these files and note that a research visit to our office may be required.Research appointments may be made by contacting us a week in advance.Future applications that fail to provide adequate location information will be returned for additional information and the review period will be accordingly reset.SHPO staff does not conduct research on behalf of others during Section 106. This letter evidences HUD's compliance with 36 CFR§800.4"Identification of historic properties,"and the fulfillment of HUD's responsibility to notify the SHPO,as a consulting party in the Section 106 process,under 36 CFR§800.4(d)(1)"No historic properties affected."If the scope of work changes in any way,or if artifacts or bones are discovered,please notify this office immediately. We remind you that federal agency officials or their delegated authorities are required to involve the public in a manner that reflects the nature and complexity of the undertaking and its effects on historic properties per 36 CFR§800.2(d). The National Historic Preservation Act also requires that federal agencies consult with any Indian tribe and/or Tribal Historic Preservation Officer(THPO)that attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties that may be affected by the agency's undertakings per 36 CFR§800.2(c)(2)(ii). The State Historic Preservation Office is not the office of record for this undertaking. You are therefore asked to maintain a copy of this letter with your environmental review record for this undertaking. State Historic Preservation Office 735 EAST MICHIGAN AVENUE•PO BOX 30044•LANSING,MICHIGAN 48909 If you have any questions, please contact Brian Grennell,Cultural Resource Management Specialist,at 517-335-2721 or by email at GrennellB@michigan.gov.. Please reference our project number in all communication with this office regarding this undertaking. Thank you for this opportunity to review and comment,and for your cooperation. Sincerely, Brian G.Gre+n+nel Cultural ResdUr e?nagement Specialist for Brian D.Conway State Historic Preservation Officer SAT:BGG Copy: Carmen Reveron, HUD Emma Henry,Capital Area Housing Partnership Mani Thbe Of 0Mrahlorna . 3410 P St 1\K Miant,OK 74354 a P.O. Box 1.326,A/fianv,OK 74355 a z, Ph(918)541-1300 (918)542-7260 www.rriardnadoncom January 18, 2019 Doris M. Witherspoon Senior Planner City of Lansing Department of Planning and Neighborhood Development 316 N. Capitol Lansing, MI 48910 Re:New Construction on Glenburne Blvd, Lansing, Michigan—Comments of the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Dear Ms. Witherspoon: Aya, kikwehsitoole—I show you respect. My name is Diane Hunter,and I am the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer for the Federally Recognized Miami Tribe of Oklahoma. In this capacity, I am the Miami Tribe's point of contact for all Section 106 issues. The Miami Tribe offers no objection to the above-mentioned project at this time, as we are not currently aware of existing documentation directly linking a specific Miami cultural or historic site to the project site. However, as this site is within the aboriginal homelands of the Miami Tribe, if any human remains or Native American cultural items falling under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act(NAGPRA) or archaeological evidence is discovered during any phase of this project, the Miami Tribe requests immediate consultation with the entity of jurisdiction for the location of discovery. In such a case, please contact me at 918-541-8966 or by email at - ii:._; to initiate consultation. The Miami Tribe accepts the invitation to serve as a consulting party to the proposed project. In my capacity as Tribal Historic Preservation Officer I am the point of contact for consultation. Respectfully, Diane Hunter Tribal Historic Preservation Officer New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 APPENDIX A: Related Federal Laves and Authorities Airport Hazards General policy Legislation Regulation It is HUD's policy to apply standards to 24 CFR Part 51 Subpart D prevent incompatible development around civil airports and military airfields. 1. To ensure compatible land use development,you must determine your site's proxinniiy to;iLil - military,airports. Is your project within 15;000 feet of a military airport or 2,500 feet of a civilian airport? ✓ No Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Document and upload the map showing that the site is not within the applicable distances to a military or civilian airport below Yes Screen Summary Compliance Determination The project site is not within 15,000 feet of a military airport or 2,500 feet of a civilian airport. The project is in compliance with Airport Hazards requirements. Supporting documentation Airport-Hazards-Worksheet.doex Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Yes ✓ No r 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 9 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Coastal Barrier Resources General requirements Legislation Regulation HUD financial assistance may not be Coastal Barrier Resources Act used for most activities in units of the (CBRA) of 1982, as amended by Coastal Barrier Resources System the Coastal Barrier Improvement (CBRS). See 16 USC 3504 for limitations Act of 1990 (16 USC 3501) on federal expenditures affecting the CBRS. 1. Is the project located in a CBRS Unit? ✓ No Document and upload map and documentation below. Yes Compliance Determination This project is not located in a CBRS Unit. Therefore, this project has no potential to impact a CBRS Unit and is in compliance with the Coastal Barrier Resources Act. Supporting documentation Coastalbarrierresources system map.pdf Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Yes ✓ No 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 10 of 35 New-Construction Lansing; MI 900000010074898 Flood Insurance General requirements legislation Regulation Certain types of federal financial assistance may not be Flood Disaster 24 CFR 50.4(b)(1) used in floodplains unlessthe community participates Protection Act of 1973 and 24 CFR 58.6(a) in National Flood Insurance Program and flood as amended (42 USC and (b);24 CFR insurance is both obtained and maintained. 4001-4128) 55.1(b). 1. . .:._^Q_oes this project involve financial assistance for construction. rehabilitation, or acquisition of a mobile home, building,or insurable personal property? ✓ No. This project does not require flood insurance or is excepted from flood insurance. Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Yes Screen Summary Compliance Determination Based on the project description the project includes no activities that would require further evaluation under this section. The project does not require flood insurance or is excepted from flood insurance. While flood insurance may not be mandatory in this instance, HUD recommends that all insurable structures maintain flood insurance under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The project is in compliance with Flood Insurance requirements. Supporting documentation Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Yes ✓ No 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 11 of 35 New-Construction . Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Air Quality Generai requirements Legislation Reguiation The Clean Air Act is administered Clean Air Act (42 USC 7401 et seq.) 40 OFR Parts'6,51 by the U.S. Environmental as amended particularly Section and 93 Protection Agency(EPA), which 176(c) and (d) (42 USC 7506(c)and sets national standards on ambient (d)) pollutants. In addition, the Clean Air Act is administered by States, which must develop State 7- -- Implementation Plans (SIPS) to regulate their state air quality. Projects funded by HUD must demonstrate that they conform to the appropriate SIP. 1. Does your project include new construction or conversion of land use facilitating the development of public, commercial, or industrial facilities OR five or more dwelling units? ✓ Yes No Air Quality Attainment Status of Project's County or Air Quality Management District 2. Is your project's air quality management district or county in non-attainment or maintenance status for any criteria pollutants? ✓ No, project's county or air quality management district is in attainment status for all criteria pollutants. Yes, project's management district or county is in non-attainment or maintenance status for the following criteria pollutants (check all that apply): Screen Summary Compliance Determination The project's county or air quality management district is in attainment status for all criteria pollutants. The project is in compliance with the Clean Air Act. Supporting documentation Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 12 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Yes No 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 13 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Coastal Zone Management Act General requirements Legislation Regulation Federal assistance to applicant ' Coastal Zone Management 15 CFR Part 930 f agencies for activities affecting Act (16 USC 1451-1464), any coastal use or resource is particularly section 307(c)and granted only when such (d) (16 USC 1456(c) and (d)) activities are consistent with federally approved State Coastal Zone Management Act Plans. - - -- - 1. Is the project located in,or does it affect,a Coastal Zone as defined in your state Coastal Management Plan? Yes ✓ No Based on the response,the review is in compliance with this section. Document and upload all documents used to make your determination below. Screen Summary Compliance Determination This project is not located in or does not affect a Coastal Zone as defined in the state Coastal Management Plan. The project is in compliance with the Coastal Zone Management Act. Supporting documentation Coastalbarrierresourees system man(lpd£ Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Yes ✓ No 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 14 of 35 New-Construction . Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Contamination and Toxic Substances General requirements Legislation Regulations It is HUD policy that all properties that are being 24 CFR 58.5(i)(2) proposed for use in HUD programs be free of 24 CFR 50.3(i) hazardous materials, contamination,toxic chemicals and gases, and radioactive substances, where a hazard could affect the health and safety of the occupants or conflict with the intended utilization of the property. 1. Evaluate the site for contamination. Were any on-site or nearby toxic, hazardous,or radioactive substances found.that could affect the health and safety of project occupants or conflict with the intended use of the property? ✓ No Explain: The City of Lansing's Fire Marshal maintains a listing of all significant storage facilities in the city. Proposed sites will be reviewd against the list for location and compliance w/distance standards. Based on the response,the review is in compliance with this section. Yes Check here if an ASTM Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report was utilized. [Note: HUD regulations does not require an ASTM Phase I ESA report for single family homes] Screen Summary Compliance Determination On-site or nearby toxic, hazardous, or radioactive substances that could affect the health and safety of project occupants or conflict with the intended use of the property were not found. The project is in compliance with contamination and toxic substances requirements. 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 15 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Supporting documentation Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Yes ✓ No 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 16 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Endangered Species General requirements ESA Legislation Regulations Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act(ESA) The Endangered 50 CFR Part mandates that federal agencies ensure that . Species Act of 1973 (16 402 actions that they authorize, fund, or carry out U.S.C. 1531 etseq.); shall not jeopardize the continued existence of particularly section 7 federally listed plants and animals or result in the (16 USC 1536). adverse modification or destruction of designated critical habitat. Where their actions may affect resources protected by the ESA, agencies must consult with the Fish and Wildlife Service and/or the National Marine Fisheries Service ("FWS" and "NMFS" or"the Services"). 1. Does the project involve any activities that have the potential to affect specifies or habitats? No, the project will have No Effect due to the nature of the activities involved in the project. No, the project will have No Effect based on a letter of understanding, memorandum of agreement;programmatic agreement, or checklist provided by local HUD office ✓ Yes,the activities involved in the project have the potential to affect species and/or habitats. 2. Are federally listed species or designated critical habitats present in the action area? ✓ No,the project will have No Effect due to the absence of federally listed species and designated critical habitat Based on the response,the review is in compliance with this section. Document and upload all documents used to make your determination below. Documentation may include letters from the Services,species lists from the Services' websites, surveys or other documents and analysis showing that there are no species in the action area. Yes, there are federally listed species or designated critical habitats present in the action area. 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 17 of 35 New-ConstrUction Lansing, MI 900000010.074898 Screen Summar) Compliavice Determination This project will have No Effect on listed species because there are no listed species or designated critical habitats in the action area. This project is in compliance with the Endangered Species Act. Supporting documentation Endangeredi-i)ecies-Act-Worksheet doc� _ Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Yes ✓ No 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 18 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Explosive and Flammable Hazards General requirements Legislation Regulation HUD-assisted projects must meet N/A 24 CFR Curt-52 Acceptable Separation Distance (ASD) Subpart C requirements to protect them from explosive and flammable hazards. 1. Is the proposed HUD-assisted project a hazardous facility(a facility that mainly stores, handles or-processes flammable or combustible chemicals), i.e. bulk fL!e!-s*orage facilities, refineries,etc.? ✓ No Yes 2. Does this project include any of the following activities: development, construction, rehabilitation that will increase residential densities,or conversion? No ✓ Yes 3. Within 1 mile of the project site,are there any current or planned stationary aboveground storage containers: © Of more than 100 gallon capacity, containing common liquid industrial fuels OIL o Of any capacity,containing hazardous liquids or gases that are not common liquid industrial fuels? ✓ No Based on the response,the review is in compliance with this section. Document and upload all documents used to make your determination below. Yes Screen Summary 01/29/2019 08:24 Pale 19 of 35 New-Construction. Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Compliance Determination There are no current or planned stationary aboveground storage containers of concern within 1 mile of the project site. The project is in compliance with explosive and flammable hazard requirements. Supporting documentation Are'formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Yes No 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 20 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Farmlands Protection General requirements Legislation Regulation The Farmland Protection Farmland Protection Policy 7 C tR Part 658 Policy Act(FPPA)discourages Art of 1981 (7 U.S.C.4201 et federal activities that would seq.) convert farmland to nonagricultural purposes. 1. Does_*tcur;project include any activities, including new construcUmni acquisition of undeveloped land or conversion,that could convert agricultural land to a non-agricultural use? ✓ Yes No 2. Does your project meet one of the following exemptions? • Construction limited to on-farm structures needed for Farm operations. • Construction limited to new minor secondary(accessory) structures such as a garage or storage shed • Project on land already in or committed to urban development or used for water storage. (7 CFR 658.2(a)) ✓ Yes Based on the response,the review is in compliance with this section. Document and upload all documents used to make your determination below. No Screen Summary Compliance Determination This project includes activities that could potentially convert agricultural land to a non- agricultural use, but an exemption applies. The project is in compliance with the Farmland Protection Policy Act. Supporting documentation Farmlands-Protection-Worlcsheet.doex Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 21 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Yes ✓ No 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 22 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 F9oodplain Management Executive Order 11988, Executive Order 11988 24 CFR 55 Floodplain Management, requires federal activities to avoid impacts to floodplains and to avoid direct and indirect support of floodplain development ta.the extent practicable. 1. Do any of the following exemptions apply? Select the applicable citation? [only one selection possible] ✓ 55.12(c)(3) 55.12(c)(4) 55.12(c)(5) 55.12(c)(6) 55.12(c)(7) 55.12(c)(8) 55.12(c)(9) 55.12(c)(10) 55.12(c)(11) None of the above Based on the response,the review is in compliance with this section. Screen Summary Compliance Determination The following exception applies, so the project is in compliance with Executive Order 11988: 55.12(c)(3), The approval of financial assistance for restoring and preserving the natural and beneficial functions and values of floodplains and wetlands, including through acquisition of such floodplain and wetlands property, but only if:(i) The property is cleared of all existing structures and related improvements;(ii) The property is dedicated for permanent use for flood control, wetlands protection, park land, or open space; and (iii) A permanent covenant or comparable restriction is placed on the property's continued use to preserve the floodplain or wetlands from future development. Supporting documentation Flood plain Man Glenhurne Blvd.pdf 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 23 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Yes f No 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 24 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Historic Preservation General requirements Legislation Regulation Regulations under Section 106 of the 36 CFR 800 "Protection of Historic Section 106 of the National Historic Properties" National Historic Preservation Act http://www.access.gpo.gov/.nara/cfr/wai'si' Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470f) dx 10/36cfr800 10.html (NHPA) require a consultative process to identify historic properties, assess project impacts on them, and avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects Threshold Is Section 106 review required for your project? No, because the project consists solely of activities listed as exempt in a Programmatic Agreement (PA ). (See the PA Database to find applicable PAs.) No, because the project consists solely of activities included in a No Potential to Cause Effects memo or other determination [36 CFR 800.3(a)(1)]. ✓ Yes, because the project includes activities with potential to cause effects (direct or indirect). Step 1—Initiate Consultation Select all consulting parties below(check all that apply): ✓State Historic Preservation Offer(SHPO) Completed ✓ Indian Tribes, including Tribal Historic Preservation Officers (THPOs) or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 25 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 ✓ Lac du Flambeau Band In progress ✓ Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin in progress ✓ Miami Tribe of Oldahoma In progress ✓ Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan In progress ✓ Sault Ste. Marie Tribe In progress Other Consulting Parties Describe the process of selecting consulting parties and initiating consultation here: Letter sent December 20, 2018 and awaiting responses Document and upload all correspondence, notices and notes(including comments and objections received below). Step 2—Identify and Evaluate Historic Properties 1. Define the Area of Potential Effect(APE), either by entering the address(es)or uploading a map depicting the APE below: In the chart below, list historic properties identified and evaluated in the APE. Every historic property that may be affected by the project should be included in the chart. Upload the documentation (survey forms, Register nominations, concurrence(s) and/or objection(s), notes, and photos) that justify your National Register Status determination below. Address/ Location/ National Register SHPO Sensitive District Status Concurrence Information Four vacat lots on Glenburne Blvd. Not Eligible Yes ✓ Not Sensitive Additional (Votes: 2. Was a survey of historic buildings and/or archeological sites done as part of the project? Yes 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 26 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 ✓ No Step 3—Assess Effa:ds o f-the Project on WstorPc P#,opei lies Only properties that are listed on or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places receive further consideration under Section 106. Assess the effect(s) of the project by applying the Criteria of Adverse Effect. (36 CFR 800.5)] Consider direct and indirect effects as applicable as per guidance on direct and indirect effects. Choose one of the findings below-No Historic Properties Affected,No Adverse Effect,or Adverse Effect;and seek concurrence from consulting parries. No Historic Properties Affected No Adverse Effect Adverse Effect Screen Summary Compliance Determination Supporting documentation Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Yes No 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 27 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Noise Abatement and Control General requirements Legislation Regulation HUD's noise regulations protect Noise Control Act of 1972 Title 24 CFR 51 residential properties from Subpart B excessive noise exposure. HUD General Services Administration encourages mitigation as Federal Management Circular 75- appropriate. 2: "Compatible Land Uses at Federal Airfields" 1. What activities does your project involve?Check all that apply: ✓ New construction for residential use NOTE: HUD assistance to new construction projects is generally prohibited if they are located in an Unacceptable zone, and HUD discourages assistance for new construction projects in Normally Unacceptable zones. See 24 CFR 51.101(a)(3)for further details. Rehabilitation of an existing residential property A research demonstration project which does not result in new construction or reconstruction An interstate land sales registration Any timely emergency assistance under disaster assistance provision or appropriations which are provided to save lives, protect property, protect public health and safety, remove debris and wreckage, or assistance that has the effect of restoring facilities substantially as they existed prior to the disaster None of the above 4. Complete the Preliminary Screening to identify potential noise generators in the vicinity(1000'from a major road,3000'from a railroad,or 15 miles from an airport). Indicate the findings of the Preliminary Screening below: ✓ There are no noise generators found within the threshold distances above. 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 28 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Based on the response,the review is in compliance with this section. Document and upload a map showing the location of the project relative to any noise generators below. Noise generators were found within the threshold distances. Screen Summary Compliance Determination Tiie=Freltniinary Screening identified no noise generators-In the vicinity of the project. The project is in compliance with HUD's Noise regulation. Supporting documentation Noise Determination- Map- Glenburne - old us 27.pdf Traffic Count Info-Parcel map.pdf Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Yes ✓ No 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 29 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Soie Source Aquifers General requirements legislation Regulation The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 Safe Drinking Wai:er Act 40 CFR Part 149 protects drinking water systems of 1974 (42 U.S.C. .201, which are the sole or principal 300f et seq., and 21 drinking water source for an area and U.S.C. 349) which, if contaminated,would create a significant hazard to public health. 1. Does the project consist solely of acquisition, leasing,or rehabilitation of an existing building(s)? Yes ✓ No 2. Is the project located on a sole source aquifer(SSA)? A sole source aquifer is defined as an aquifer that supplies at least 50 percent of the drinking water consumed in the area overlying the aquifer.This includes streamflow source areas, which are upstream areas of losing streams that flow into the recharge area. ✓ No Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Document and upload documentation used to make your determination, such as a map of your project (or jurisdiction, if appropriate) in relation to the nearest SSA and its source area, below. Yes Screen Summary Compliance Determination The project is not located on a sole source aquifer area. The project is in compliance with Sole Source Aquifer requirements. Supporting documentation 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 30 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Sole.-Sol-uce-Aquifers-Work_sheei..cioc Are formal compliance seeps or mitigation required? Yes ✓ No 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 31 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Wetlands Protection Geperal requirements Legislation Regulation Executive Order 11990 discourages direct or Executive Order 24 CFR 55.20 can be i indirect support of new construction impacting 11990 used for general wetlands wherever there is a practicable guidance regarding alternative. The Fish and Wildlife Service's the 8 Step Process. National Wetlands Inventory can be used as a primary screening tool, but observed or known wetlands not indicated on NWI maps must also be processed Off-site impacts that result in draining, impounding, or destroying wetlands j must also be processed. 1. Does this project involve new construction as defined in Executive Order 11990, expansion of a building's footprint,or ground disturbance?The term "new construction"shall include draining, dredging, channelizing,filling, diking, impounding, and related activities and any structures or facilities begun or authorized after the effective date of the Order No ✓ Yes 2. Will the new construction or other ground disturbance impact an on-or off-site wetland?The term "wetlands" means those areas that are inundated by surface or ground water with a frequency sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances does or would support, a prevalence of vegetative or aquatic life that requires saturated or seasonally saturated soil conditions for growth and reproduction. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs,and similar areas such as sloughs, potholes,wet meadows, river overflows, mud flats, and natural ponds. "Wetlands under E.O. 11990 include isolated and non-jurisdictional wetlands." ✓ No, a wetland will not be impacted in terms of E.O. 11990's definition of new construction. Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Document and upload a map or any other relevant documentation below which explains your determination Yes, there is a wetland that be impacted in terms of E.O. 11990's definition of new construction. Screen Summary Compliance Determination 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 32 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 The project will not impact on- or on`-site wetlands. The project is in compliance with Executive Order 11990. Supporting documentation Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Yes ✓ No 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 33 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Wild and Scenic Rivers Act General requirements Legislation Regulation The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act The Wild and Scenic Rivers 36 CFR Part 297 provides federal protection for Act (16 U.S.C. 1271-1287), certain free-flowing, wild, scenic particularly section 7(b) and and recreational rivers designated (c) (16 U.S.C. 1278(b) and (c)) as components or potential components of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (NWSRS) from the effects of construction or development. 1. Is your project within proximity of a NWSRS river? ✓ No Yes, the project is in proximity of a Designated Wild and Scenic River or Study Wild and Scenic River. Yes, the project is in proximity of a Nationwide Rivers Inventory (NRI) River. Screen Summary Compliance Determination This project is not within proximity of a NWSRS river. The project is in compliance with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. Supporting documentation Wild-and-Scenic-Rivers-Worksheet.docx Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Yes ✓ No 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 34 of 35 New-Construction Lansing, MI 900000010074898 Environmental onmental Jus-t"CAce General requirements Legislation Regulation Determine if the project creates Executive Order 12890' adverse environmental impacts upon a low-income or minority community. If it does, engage the community in meaningful participation about mitigating the impacts or move the project. IUD strongly encourages starting the Environmental Justice analysis only after all other laws and authorities,including Environmental Assessment factors if necessary, have been completed. 1. Were any adverse environmental impacts identified in any other compliance review portion of this project's total environmental review? Yes ✓ No Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Screen Summary Compliance Determination No adverse environmental impacts were identified in the project's total environmental review. The project is in compliance with Executive Order 12898. Supporting documentation Environrr!ental-Justice-Worlcsheet.do cx Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Yes ✓ No 01/29/2019 08:24 Page 35 of 35 PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST RELEASE OF FUNDS January 30, 2019 CITY OF LANSING, MICHIGAN _ DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING 316 N. CAPITOL AVE. LANSING, MI48933 (517)483-4040 CONTACT: Donald Kulhanek, Development Manager TO ALL INTERESTED AGENCIES, GROUPS AND PERSONS: These notices shall satisfy two separate but related procedural requirements for activities to be undertaken by the City of Lansing, MI. REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS On or about February 15, 2019, the City of Lansing, MI will submit a request to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD) for the release of HOME funds under Title II of the Cranston- Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act, as amended, to undertake a project known as the New Construction of four(4)single family homes, each constructed on a separate vacant lot on Glenburne Blvd in Southwest Lansing. This project will focus on the construction of four(4) new single family homes for sale to homebuyers and will model the energy efficiency, design and amenities that characterize the type of future new housing development that best fits Lansing's urban neighborhood properties. Funds will be available for projects to be purchased by households with income at or below 80%of area median income. Construction will take place on previously developed lots in single-family residential areas. More specifically, this project involves the new construction of single family homes, one on each lot on Glenburne Blvd in Southwest Lansing. Each lot will contain a single-family home with 3 bedrooms and at least 1.5 baths and a full basement and will be made available to income qualified homebuyers using Down Payment Assistance through HOME funds of approximately$225,000 per house will be invested in the project along with funds from the CHDO. Estimated Total Expenditures: $900,456.000 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT The City of Lansing, MI has determined that the project will have no significant impact on the human environment.Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) is not required. Additional project information is contained in the Environmental Review Record (ERR)on file at the City of Lansing Department of Economic Development and Planning, 316 N. Capitol, where the record is available for review and may be examined or copied M- F 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS Any individual,group, or agency disagreeing with this determination or wishing to comment on the project may submit written comments to: Doris M. Witherspoon, Senior Planner, City of Lansing Department of Planning and Neighborhood Development, 316 N. Capitol, Lansing, MI 48933, doris.witherspoon@lansingmi.Rov or at City Clerk Office, 124 W. Michigan Ave,Capital Area District Library,400.S.Capitol Ave, Lansing, MI. All comments received by 5:00 p.m., February 14, 2019 will be considered by the City of Lansing Department of Economic Development and Planning prior to authorizing submission to HUD of a request for release of funds. Comments should specify which Notice they are addressing. RELEASE OF FUNDS The City of Lansing certifies to U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development that Andy Schor in his' capacity as Mayor, City of Lansing consents to accept the jurisdiction of the Federal Courts if an action is brought to enforce responsibilities in relation to the environmental review process and that these responsibilities have been satisfied. HUD's approval of the certification satisfies its responsibilities under NEPA and related laws and authorities, and allows the City of Lansing to use Program funds. OBJECTIONS TO RELEASE OF FUNDS U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development will accept objections to its release of funds and the City of Lansing,MI's certification for a period of fifteen days following the February 15, 2019 submission date only if they are on one of the following bases: (a) the certification was not executed by the Mayor, City of Lansing;(b)the City of Lansing, MI has omitted a step or failed to make a decision or finding required by HUD regulations at 24 CFR Part 58; (c)the grant recipient has committed funds or incurred costs not authorized by 24 CFR Part 58 before approval of a release of funds by HUD; or(d) another Federal agency acting pursuant to 40 CFR Part 1504 has submitted a written finding that the project is unsatisfactory from the standpoint of environmental quality. Objections must be prepared and submitted in accordance with the required procedures (24 CFR Part 58) and shall be addressed to: Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Community Planning and Development, 477 Michigan Avenue, [)etroit Mil nonnc n,.+-ential „k;-,+—,, �k—..1,J � n+n�-4 4J1 If1 ❑+I2121 77F_7gnn to%iorifv tho artiial kart ri;w vcuvi�, rvii �rc�c�u. rucciivai vbject.io hou.0 contact UD , of the objection period. Andy Schor, Mayor, City of Lansing, MI