Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991 - Demolition Board Minutes OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS of the DEMOLITIION HEARING OFFICERS MEETING October 24, 1991 HEARING OFFICERS PRESENT: Gloria Jones and Donald Hartwick HEARING OFFICERS ABSENT: J. Paul Thompson STAFF PRESENT: John Salmons and James Kzeski Mr. Salmons convened the meeting at 7:01 p.m. OLD BUSINESS: None NEW BUSINESS: r7 Cr First Case — 911 W. Shiawassee (Garage Only) G No owner was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief discussion of the condition of the garage. The SEV of the structure is $635, estimated cost of repairs is $6,750. dMrs. Jones ordered the property to be safe for its intended use or Como ished7iz within 14 days, or by November 7, 1991. C.0 Second Case — 2026 William (Garage Only) Mr. Salmons indicated that the accessory structure at 2026 William has been razed. Mr. Hartwick determined that this structure is no longer considered unsafe. Third Case — 2217 N. High The owner, Mr. Basel, was present along with his Attorney James Vandebunte. Mr. Salmons explained that this was the third time this particular structure had gone through the demolition process. The SEV of the structure is listed at no value, the estimated cost of repairs is $3,500. Mr. Vandebunte stated that this structure had been ruled on by Judge Brown and that this action was inappropriate. Mr. Salmons stated that he would check with Jack Roberts, Assistant City Attorney, on whether or not the City should go back to Judge Brown or go ahead with the process. The Hearing Officers reluctantly referred the matter back to the Building Safety Division. Demolition Hearing meeting October 24, 1991 Page 2 Fourth Case — 419 S. Fairview The owner, Mr•. Basel, was present. Mr. Salmons stated that this structure was damaged by fire. A pre—fire SEV showed $7,655, estimated cost of repairs is $10,000. Mr. Basel stated that he has had difficulty in collecting his insurance because it was an arson case. Mrs. Jones asked when he was going to do something to the structure. Mr. Basel indicated probably within the next 10 days. Mrs. Jones ordered the property to be made safe for its intended use or demolished within 14 days, or by November 7, 1991. Fifth Case — 320 Beaver The owner was not present, however, the owner is Mr. Basel' s sister and he represented her. Mr. Salmons stated that this structure was one of two main structures on a lot zoned Industrial. The SEV of the structure is $1,144, estimated cost of repairs is $3,500. Mr. Salmons also stated that there is an appeal before the Building Board of Appeals to be heard in November. The appeal is in regards to the need for a foundation. Mr. Basel stated they wanted to make repairs to the structure. Mr. Salmons explained that this was a non—conforming issue and repair would be limited. Mr. Vandebunte seem confused as to why such a limitation existed so Mr. Salmons further explained the concept of non—conforming to him. Mr. Hartwick ordered the property to be made safe for its intended use or demolished within 14 days, or by November 7, 1991. Sixth Case — 837 May The owner, Mr. Basel, was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the property and stated that the SEV of the building is $4,672, estimated cost of repairs is minimally $6,000. Mr. Basel stated he had pulled a building permit, and Ray Graham was working on the structure. He also believed that other permits, excluding plumbing, had been taken out. Mr. Vandebunte asked for the issue to be tabled because of the activity. Mr. Kzeski and Mr. Salmons both suggested that the Hearing Officers make a determination and let the Building Safety Staff monitor the progress, keeping it at the lower level as long as good progress was being made. There was some discussion on this. Mr. Hartwick ordered the property to be made safe for its intended use or demolished within 14 days, or by November 7, 1991. Demolition Hearing Meeting October 24, 1991 Page 3 Seventh Case — 605 Lathrop The owner, Rick Kibby, was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history on the structure. The SEV of the building is $13,170, estimated cost of repairs is $19,150. Mr. Kibby indicated that the structure was really in pretty good shape and he did not think it should be demolished. Mr. Hartwick stated that based on the letter and the few pictures, he didn't see how this met demolition criteria. Most of the repairs on the letter were for the garage. This matter was referred back to the Building Safety Division. Eighth Case — 230 N. Foster No owner was present. Mr. Salmons gave a long history on the structure and passed along comments from three neighbors. The SEV of the structure is $11,900, estimated cost of repairs is $15,600. Mrs. Jones ordered that the structure be made safe for its intended use or demolished with 14 days, or by November 7, 1991. Ninth Case — 1107 E. Saginaw No owner was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the structure. The SEV is $2,815, estimated cost of repairs is $6,500. Mr. Hartwick ordered the structure to be made safe for its intended use or demolished within 14 days, or by November 7, 1991. Tenth Case — 617 S. Hayford No owner was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the structure. The SEV is $2,500, estimated cost of repairs is $19,000. Mrs. Jones ordered the structure to be made safe for its intended use or demolished within 14 days, or by November 7, 1991. Eleventh Case — 619 S. Hayford No owner was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the structure. The SEV is $7,900, estimated cost of repair is $10,900. Mrs. Jones ordered the property to be made safe for its intended use or demolished within 14 days. Twelfth Case — 827 Euclid Place No owner was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the structure. The SEV is $7,105, estimated cost of repairs is $13,900. Mr. Salmons stated that he had talked with Mr. & Mrs. Coss who have recently gotten the property back from Demolition Hearing Meeting October 24, 1991 Page 4 Jerry King. They are looking to sell it to someone who would make the repairs. Mr. Hartwick ordered the property to be made safe for its intended use or demolished within 14 days, or by November 7, 1991. Thirteenth Case — 430 Leslie No owner was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the structure. The SEV is $10,814, estimated cost of repairs is $12,500. Mrs. Jones ordered the property to be made safe for its intended use or demolished within 14 days, or by November 7, 1991. Fourteenth Case — 921 Nipp (Garage Only) No owner was present. Mr. Salmons stated that this garage was in deplorable condition. The SEV is $1,000, estimated cost of repairs is $5,500. Mr. Hartwick ordered the structure to be made safe for its intended use or demolished with 14 days, or by November 7, 1991. The meeting adjourned at 8:12 p.m. Respect lly tted, John Salmons Secretary JS/mmr NOV 0 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS r of the DEMOLITIION HEARING OFFICERS MEETING October 24, 1991 HEARING OFFICERS PRESENT: Gloria Jones and Donald Hartwick cra HEARING OFFICERS ABSENT: J. Paul Thompson STAFF PRESENT: John Salmons and James Kzeski r; Mr. Salmons convened the meeting at 7:01 p.m. OLD BUSINESS: None —_ NEW BUSINESS: CJ First Case — 911 W. Shiawassee (Garage Only) No owner was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief discussion of the condition of the garage. The SEV of the structure is $635, estimated cost of repairs is $6,750. Mrs. Jones ordered the property to be safe for its intended use or demolished within 14 days, or by November 7, 1991. Second Case — 2026 William (Garage Only) Mr. Salmons indicated that the accessory structure at 2026 William has been razed. Mr. Hartwick determined that this structure is no longer considered unsafe. Third Case — 2217 N. High The owner, Mr. Basel, was present along with his Attorney James Vandebunte. Mr. Salmons explained that this was the third time this particular structure had gone through the demolition process. The SEV of the structure is listed at no value, the, estimated cost of repairs is $3,500. Mr. Vandebunte stated that this structure had been ruled on by Judge Brown and that this action was inappropriate. Mr. Salmons stated that he would check with Jack Roberts, Assistant City Attorney, on whether or not the City should go back to Judge Brown or go ahead with the process. The Hearing Officers reluctantly referred the matter back to the Building Safety Division. Demolition Hearing meeting October 24, 1991 Page 2 Fourth Case — 419 S. Fairview The owner, Mr. Basel, was present. Mr. Salmons stated that this structure was damaged by fire. A pre—fire SEV showed $7,655, estimated cost of repairs is $10,000. Mr. Basel stated that he has had difficulty in collecting his insurance because it was an arson case. Mrs. Jones asked when he was going to do something to the structure. Mr. Basel indicated probably within the next 10 days. Mrs. Jones ordered the property to be made safe for its intended use or demolished within 14 days, or by November 7, 1991. Fifth Case — 320 Beaver The owner was not present, however, the owner is Mr. Basel' s sister and he represented her. Mr. Salmons stated that this structure was one of two main structures on a lot zoned Industrial. The SEV of the structure is $1,144, estimated cost of repairs is $3,500. Mr. Salmons also stated that there is an appeal before the Building Board of Appeals to be heard in November. The appeal is in regards to the need for a foundation. Mr. Basel stated they wanted to make repairs to the structure. Mr. Salmons explained that this was a non—conforming issue and repair would be limited. Mr. Vandebunte seem confused as to why such a limitation existed so Mr. Salmons further explained the concept of non—conforming to him. Mr. Hartwick ordered the property to be made safe for its intended use or demolished within 14 days, or by November 7, 1991. Sixth Case — 837 May The owner, Mr. Basel, was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the property and stated that the SEV of the building is $4,672, estimated cost of repairs is minimally $6,000. Mr. Basel stated he had pulled a building permit, and Ray Graham was working on the structure. He also believed that other permits, excluding plumbing, had been taken out. Mr. Vandebunte asked for the issue to be tabled because of the activity. Mr. Kzeski and Mr. Salmons both suggested that the Hearing Officers make a determination and let the Building Safety Staff monitor the progress, keeping it at the lower level as long as good progress was being made. There was some discussion on this. Mr. Hartwick ordered the property to be made safe for its intended use or demolished within 14 days, or by November 7, 1991. Demolition Hearing Meeting October 24, 1991 Page 3 Seventh Case — 605 Lathrop The owner, Rick Kibby, was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history on the structure. The SEV of the building is $13,170, estimated cost of repairs is $19,150. Mr. Kibby indicated that the structure was really in pretty good shape and he did not think it should be demolished. Mr. Hartwick stated that based on the letter and the few pictures, he didn't see how this met demolition criteria. Most of the repairs on the letter were for the garage. This matter was referred back to the Building Safety Division. Eighth Case — 230 N. Foster No owner was present. Mr. Salmons gave a long history on the structure and passed along comments from three neighbors. The SEV of the structure is $11,900, estimated cost of repairs is $15,600. Mrs. Jones ordered that the structure be made safe for its intended use or demolished with 14 days, or by November 7, 1991. Ninth Case — 1107 E. Saginaw No owner was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the structure. The SEV is $2,815, estimated cost of repairs is $6,500. Mr. Hartwick ordered the structure to be made safe for its intended use or demolished within 14 days, or by November 7, 1991. Tenth Case — 617 S. Hayford No owner was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the structure. The SEV is $2,500, estimated cost of repairs is $19,000. Mrs. Jones ordered the structure to be made safe for its intended use or demolished within 14 days, or by November 7, 1991. Eleventh Case — 619 S. Hayford No owner was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the structure. The SEV is $7,900, estimated cost of repair is $10,900. Mrs. Jones ordered the property to be made safe for its intended use or demolished within 14 days. Twelfth Case — 827 Euclid Place No owner was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the structure. The SEV is $7,105, estimated cost of repairs is $13,900. Mr. Salmons stated that he had talked with Mr. & Mrs. Goss who have recently gotten the property back from Demolition Hearing Meecing October 24, 1991 Page 4 Jerry King. They are looking to sell it to someone who would make the repairs. Mr. Hartwick ordered the property to be made safe for its intended use or demolished within 14 days, or by November 7, 1991. Thirteenth Case — 430 Leslie No owner was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the structure. The SEV is $10,814, estimated cost of repairs is $12,500. Mrs. Jones ordered the property to be made safe for its intended use or demolished within 14 days, or by November 7, 1991. Fourteenth Case — 921 Nipp (Garage Only) No owner was present. Mr. Salmons stated that this garage was in deplorable condition. The SEV is $1,000, estimated cost of repairs is $5,500. Mr. Hartwick ordered the structure to be made safe for its intended use or demolished with 14 days, or by November 7, 1991. The meeting adjourned at 8:12 p.m. Respect lly tted, John Salmons Secretary JS/mmr OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS of the DEMOLITION HEARING OFFICERS MEETING September 26, 1991 HEARING OFFICERS PRESENT: Gloria Jones and J. Paul Thompson STAFF PRESENT: John Salmons and James Kzeski Mr. Salmons convened the meeting at 7:08 p.m. He explained the demolition process in detail for those in attendance. OLD BUSINESS: 539 Baker — Tabled from August 22, 1991 Hearing One of the owners, Robin Jolly, was present. Mr. Salmons again presented information regarding this property. Robin Jolly explained his problems with property. He indicated that Kerry Hagan might be interested in making the repairs on the house if he could be sure there would be a reasonable chance to do so. Mr. Salmons once again explained the process and further stated how the time frame might be expanded. Mr. Thompson empathized with Mr. Jolly, but stated that the Demolition Hearing Officers had limited discretion and ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 10, 1991. NEW BUSINESS: First Case — 216 E. Hillsdale The owner was not present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the property which is a historical structure. He stated that the owner, an elderly woman, had met with Eleanor Love, Planning Division, Linda Daugherty—Wright, Community Police Officer, Sandra Hearns, Development Division, and himself to offer her a deferred no—interest loan to repair the structure. She saw it as charity and to date has refused to cooperate. The City is looking to effectuate repairs via the demolition process, as permitted by state law. The SEV of the building is $18,106, estimated cost of repairs is $50,000. Linda Daughtery—Wright spoke on the issue. Mr. Thompson ordered the structure to be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 10, 1991 . Demolition Hearing Officers Meeting -9/26/91 Page 2 Second Case — 318 Beaver Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the property and indicated that the SEV of the structure is $6,361, estimated cost of repairs is approximately $8,300. Mr. Basel was in attendance along with a new owner, Nathan Giles. Mr. Giles stated that he had begun to make repairs, however, he was told by the Code Compliance Officer he shouldn' t put that much money into the house. Mr. Thompson and Mr. Salmons asked questions about this, and found out that the property is located in an Industrial Zoning District which does not permit residential uses. Mr. Salmons explained that this structure was non—conforming, and, as such, had strict limitations on how much could be spent on repairs. Mr. Salmons made suggestions on what might be done to resolve the issue. Ms. Jones ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 10, 1991. Third Case — 430 S. Fairview The owner, Mr. Arnston, was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the structure and stated that the SEV of the structure is $12,315, estimated cost of repairs is $16,600. Mr. Arnston explained that the problems were created by Mr. Boonsayeth who had purchased the property on a land contract. Mr. Arnston stated that he is working with Development to make the necessary repairs. Mr. Thompson ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 10, 1991. Fourth Case- - 3309 Felt The owner, William Gempel was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the property and stated that the SEV of the structure is $4,360, estimated cost of repairs is $7,800. Mr. Gempel stated that he now owned the property out—right, and was looking at making the repairs. Mr. Thompson asked how many of the repairs had been made to date? Mr. Gempel stated that not many of the repairs had been done yet. Ms. Jones ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 10, 1991 . Fifth Case — 829 Euclid Mr. Salmons gave a brief history on the property, and also stated that this was a former "Quaker" house. The SEV is $3,840, estimated cost of repairs is $6,500. Mr. Jim Buysee, P.M. One, was present and stated that they were going through the Development Division to apply for funds to make repairs. Demolition Hearing Officers Meeting 9/26/91 Page 3 Mr. Thompson ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 10, 1991. Sixth Case - 1215 E. Main Mr. Salmons and Mr. Buysee stated that the circumstances on this structure were much the same as those for 829 Euclid. The SEV of the structure is $5,950 and estimated cost of repairs is $8,000. Ms. Jones ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 10, 1991. Seventh Case - 528 N. Chestnut No owner was present. Mr. Salmons stated that this structure had been severely damaged by fire, and was offered to the City, however, the City declined the offer. A neighboring property owner is trying to negotiate purchase of the property, however, it was decided that the fire was sometime ago and that the Demolition Process was our next alternative. The SEV of the structure (pre-fire) is $9,121, estimated cost of repairs is $60,000. Ms. Jones ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 10, 1991. Eighth Case - 105 E. South Street No owner was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the commercial structure and indicated that the SEV of the structure is $2,930, estimated cost of repairs is very conservative at $13,000. Mr. Thompson ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 10, 1991 . Nineth Case - 137 E. Kilborn No owner was present, however, a letter was received from Patrick Riley who indicated that he would be making the repairs on the structure and didn't feel that the demolition process was necessary. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the property, and stated that due to the long standing deterioration of this structure he felt the process should continue. The SEV of the structure is $9,517, estimated cost of repair is $12,500. Ms. Jones ordered that the property be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 10, 1991. Tenth Case - 1503 Knollwood Demolition Hearing Officers Meeting 9/26/91 Page 4 No owner was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the property and indicated that the SEV of the structure is $6,213, estimated cost of repairs is $12,500. Mr. Thompson ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 14, 1991 . Eleventh Case — 2904 Taylor No owner was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the property and indicated that the SEV of the structure is $10,676, estimated cost of repairs is $19,500. Ms. Jones ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 10, 1991. That concluded the business for the evening. Respee''tful y ubmitted, I� 4 John Salmons Secretary JS/mmr 10 UoP T it 1 I ! L 21 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS of the DEMOLITION HEARING OFFICERS MEETING September 26, 1991 HEARING OFFICERS PRESENT: Gloria Jones and J. Paul Thompson STAFF PRESENT: John Salmons and James Kzeski Mr. Salmons convened the meeting at 7:08 p.m. He explained the demolition process in detail for those in attendance. OLD BUSINESS: 539 Baker - Tabled from August 22, 1991 Hearing One of the owners, Robin Jolly, was present. Mr. Salmons again presented information regarding this property. Robin Jolly explained his problems with property. He indicated that Kerry Hagan might be interested in making the repairs on the house if he could be sure there would be a reasonable chance to do so. Mr. Salmons once again explained the process and further stated how the time frame might be expanded. Mr. Thompson empathized with Mr. Jolly, but stated that the Demolition Hearing Officers had limited discretion and ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 10, 1991 . NEW BUSINESS: First Case - 216 E. Hillsdale The owner was not present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the property which is a historical structure. He stated that the owner, an elderly woman, had met with Eleanor Love, Planning Division, Linda Daugherty-Wright, Community Police Officer, Sandra Hearns, Development Division, and himself to offer her a deferred no-interest loan to repair the structure. She saw it as charity and to date has refused to cooperate. The City is looking to effectuate repairs via the demolition process, as permitted by state law. The SEV of the building is $18,106, estimated cost of repairs is $50,000. Linda Daughtery-Wright spoke on the issue. Mr. Thompson ordered the structure to be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 10, 1991. Demolition Hearing Officers Meeting <9/26/91 Page 2 Second Case — 318 Beaver Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the property and indicated that the SEV of the structure is $6,361, estimated cost of repairs is approximately $8,300. Mr. Basel was in attendance along with a new owner, Nathan Giles. Mr. Giles stated that he had begun to make repairs, however, he was told by the Code Compliance Officer he shouldn't put that much money into the house. Mr. Thompson and Mr. Salmons asked questions about this, and found out that the property is located in an Industrial Zoning District which does not permit residential uses. Mr. Salmons explained that this structure was non—conforming, and, as such, had strict limitations on how much could be spent on repairs. Mr. Salmons made suggestions on what might be done to resolve the issue. Ms. Jones ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 10, 1991 . Third Case — 430 S. Fairview The owner, Mr. Arnston, was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the structure and stated that the SEV of the structure is $12,315, estimated cost of repairs is $16,600. Mr. Arnston explained that the problems were created by Mr. Boonsayeth who had purchased the property on a land contract. Mr. Arnston stated that he is working with Development to make the necessary repairs. Mr. Thompson ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 10, 1991. Fourth Case — 3309 Felt The owner, William Gempel was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the property and stated that the SEV of the structure is $4,360, estimated cost of repairs is $7,800. Mr. Gempel stated that he now owned the property out—right, and was looking at making the repairs. Mr. Thompson asked how many of the repairs had been made to date? Mr. Gempel stated that not many of the repairs had been done yet. Ms. Jones ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 10, 1991 . Fifth Case — 829 Euclid Mr. Salmons gave a brief history on the property, and also stated that this was a former "Quaker" house. The SEV is $3,840, estimated cost of repairs is $6,500. Mr. Jim Buysee, P.M. One, was present and stated that they were going through the Development Division to apply for funds to make repairs. Demolition Hearing Officers Meeting 9/26/91 Page 3 Mr. Thompson ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 10, 1991. Sixth Case - 1215 E. Main Mr. Salmons and Mr. Buysee stated that the circumstances on this structure were much the same as those for 829 Euclid. The SEV of the structure is $5,950 and estimated cost of repairs is $8,000. Ms. Jones ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 10, 1991. Seventh Case - 528 N. Chestnut No owner was present. Mr. Salmons stated that this structure had been severely damaged by fire, and was offered to the City, however, the City declined the offer. A neighboring property owner is trying to negotiate purchase of the property, however, it was decided that the fire was sometime ago and that the Demolition Process was our next alternative. The SEV of the structure (pre-fire) is $9,121, estimated cost of repairs is $60,000. Ms. Jones ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 10, 1991 . Eighth Case - 105 E. South Street No owner was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the commercial structure and indicated that the SEV of the structure is $2,930, estimated cost of repairs is very conservative at $13,000. Mr. Thompson ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 10, 1991. Nineth Case - 137 E. Kilborn No owner was present, however, a letter was received from Patrick Riley who indicated that he would be making the repairs on the structure and didn't feel that the demolition process was necessary. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the property, and stated that due to the long standing deterioration of this structure he felt the process should continue. The SEV of the' structure is $9,517, estimated cost of repair is $12,500. Ms. Jones ordered that the property be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 10, 1991. Tenth Case - 1503 Knollwood Demolition Hearing Officers Meeting 9/26/91 Page 4 No owner was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the property and indicated that the SEV of the structure is $6,213, estimated cost of repairs is $12,500. Mr. Thompson ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 14, 1991. Eleventh Case — 2904 Taylor No owner was present. Mr. Salmons gave a brief history of the property and indicated that the SEV of the structure is $10,676, estimated cost of repairs is $19,500. Ms. Jones ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by October 10, 1991. That concluded the business for the evening. Respe fu1 yubmitted, John Salmons / Secretary JS/mmr -30 AUf;`� OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS ' MAYOR'S ;)r'-lCay of the CITY OF LANE,4NEI O DEMOLITION HEARING OFFICERS August 22, 1991 i :.- .--jHEARING OFFICERS PRESENT: Donald Hartwick ci HEARING OFFICERS ABSENT: Gloria Jones and J. Paul Thompson r' OLDI B691NESS: None y: rn NEW BUSINESS: Mr. Salmons called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. He briefly went through the demolition process for the public prior to starting the individual cases. F,.rst Case — 539 Baker Mr. Salmons discussed the problems with the house. The assessed value of the structure is $10,450, the estimated cost of repairs is approximately $17,000. Mr. Robin Jolly and a young woman were present to speak on this property. Mr. Jolly indicated that he bought this house, one of 22, from Quaker Management Company. He had a deal with them where they would fix them up and he would buy them. The other 21 were repaired but this one didn't get repaired before Quaker went under. Even though he had "clear title" and title insurance, he found out that Quaker had sold this house five additional times. He has been working for a year to clear the title. The title has one more obstacle to being clear. He expects to have the title clear within 30 days. He will then go through Community Development to help renovate the structure. He is in the process of getting quotes to make the repairs. Mr. Hartwick said he would table this for 30 days to let him clear the title. He indicated that he would pass an order to make safe or demolish at the next meeting. Second Case — 1417 W. Main Mr. Salmons discussed the problems with this structure, and stated that the assessed value of the building is $7,600, estimated cost of repairs is $10,000. Ed Guenette and a young lady were present to speak on the issue. Mr. Guenette indicated that he has sold the property to ROI and that they would be making the necessary repairs. Mr. Hartwick ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy within 14 days, or by September 5, 1991, or demolished. Demolition Hearing Officers Minutes August 22, 1991 Page 2 Third Case — 400 Clifford Mr. Salmons discussed the problems with the structure. He stated that the assessed value of the building is $10,000, estimated cost of repairs is approximatley $17,000. Mr. Hartwick ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy within 14 days, or by September 5, 1991, or demolished. Fourth Case — 615 Clifford Mr. Salmons discussed the problems with the structure. He stated that the assessed value of the building is $15,441, estimated cost of repairs is $20,000. Mr. Hartwick ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy within 14 days, or by September 5, 1991, or demolished. Fifth Case — 920 N. Pennsylvania Mr. Salmons stated that the house was damaged by fire, and that there was no insurance. He stated that the owner appeared to have walked away. The structure would have to be totally rebuilt. Mr. Hartwick ordered the structure to be made safe for occupancy within 14 days, or by September 5, 1991, or demolished. Sixth Case — 715 W. Barnes Mr. Salmons stated that the structure was being razed by the owner. Mr. Kzeski, who had just come in to the meeting, verified this. Mr. Hartwick orderd the structure to be made safe for occupancy within 14 days, or by September 5, 1991, or demolished. Mr. Salmons stated that the Building Safety Division would not send a letter if demolition progressed. Respectf ly submitted, John Salmons Secretary JS/mmr DY: OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS '9111uc., 39 06 of the DEMOLITION HEARING OFFICERS August 22, 1991 HEARING OFFICERS PRESENT: Donald Hartwick HEARING OFFICERS ABSENT: Gloria Jones and J. Paul Thompson OLD BUSINESS: None NEW BUSINESS: Mr. Salmons called the meeting to order at 7 :00 p.m. He briefly went through the demolition process for the public prior to starting the individual cases. First Case — 539 Baker Mr. Salmons discussed the problems with the house. The assessed value of the structure is $10,450, the estimated cost of repairs is approximately $17,000. Mr. Robin Jolly and a young woman were present to speak on this property. Mr. Jolly indicated that he bought this house, one of 22, from Quaker Management Company. He had a deal with them where they would fix them up and he would buy them. The other 21 were repaired but this one didn' t get repaired before Quaker went under. Even though he had "clear title" and title insurance, he found out that Quaker had sold this house five additional times. He has been working for a year to clear the title. The title has one more obstacle to being clear. He expects to have the title clear within 30 days. He will then go through Community Development to help renovate the structure. He is in the process of getting quotes to make the repairs. Mr. Hartwick said he would table this for 30 days to let him clear the title. He indicated that he would pass an order to make safe or demolish at the next meeting. Second Case — 1417 W. Main Mr. Salmons discussed the problems with this structure, and stated that the assessed value of the building is $7,600, estimated cost of repairs is $10,000. Ed Guenette and a young lady were present to speak on the issue. Mr. Guenette indicated that he has sold the property to ROI and that they would be making the necessary repairs. Mr. Hartwick ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy within 14 days, or by September 5, 1991, or demolished. Demolition Hearing Officers Minutes August 22, 1991 Page 2 Third Case — 400 Clifford Mr. Salmons discussed the problems with the structure. He stated that the assessed value of the building is $10,000, estimated cost of repairs is approximatley $17,000. Mr. Hartwick ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy within 14 days, or by September 5, 1991, or demolished. Fourth Case — 615 Clifford Mr. Salmons discussed the problems with the structure. He stated that the assessed value of the building is $15,441, estimated cost of repairs is $20,000. Mr. Hartwick ordered the property to be made safe for occupancy within 14 days, or by September 5, 1991, or demolished. Fifth Case — 920 N. Pennsylvania Mr. Salmons stated that the house was damaged by fire, and that there was no insurance. He stated that the owner appeared to have walked away. The structure would have to be totally rebuilt. Mr. Hartwick ordered the structure to be made safe for occupancy within 14 days, or by September 5, 1991, or demolished. Sixth Case — 715 W. Barnes Mr. Salmons stated that the structure was being razed by the owner. Mr. Kzeski, who had just come in to the meeting, verified this. Mr. Hartwick orderd the structure to be made safe for occupancy within 14 days, or by September 5, 1991, or demolished. Mr. Salmons stated that the Building Safety Division would not send a letter if demolition progressed. Respectfl�lly submitted, John Salmons Secretary JS/mmr ,, r L L LERK RECEIVED '918PR 16 Pn 3 38 PR 0 4 1991 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS MAYOR'S OFFICE of the CITY OF LANSING DEMOLITION HEARING OFFICERS March 28, 1991 HEARING OFFICERS PRESENT: J. Paul Thompson and Gloria Jones HEARING OFFICERS ABSENT: Donald Hartwick STAFF PRESENT: John Salmons and Michele Restainer OLD BUSINESS: None NEW BUSINESS: First Case — 1003 Clear Mr. Hubert Benson and Mr. Jim Buysse were present to represent P.M. One Ltd. , no other interested parties were present. Mr. Salmons explained that the assessed value of the structure is $6,600, estimated cost of repairs is $14,632. Mr. Salmons further explained that this was a house previously owned by Quaker Management. It is in the flood plain, therefore, the City of Lansing Development Division is unable to loan low interest rate funds for repair. Mr. Thompson asked those represented what the intent was for the structure. Mr. Benson stated that they obtained the house through the court proceedings from Quaker Management. They had also just received notification about the flood plain problem and would be contacting the bank to assess what should be done. Mr. Benson stated that if the mortgage was too high on the structure the bank would probably feel it was beneficial to rep.air it rather than raze the structure. The Hearing Officer's reviewed pictures of the structure and correspondence sent to the owner. Mr. Thompson determined that the structure at 1003 Clear be made safe for occupancy, or demolished within 14 days, or by April 12, 1991. Second Case — 1417 Bailey No owner was present. Mr. Salmons explained that the assessed value of the structure is $14,965, estimated cost of repairs is $16,500. Mr. Salmons further explained that this structure was damaged by fire in 1988. The Hearing Officer' s reviewed pictures of the structure and correspondence sent to the owners. Mrs. Jones determined that the structure at 1417 Bailey be made safe for occupancy, or demolished within 14 days, or by April 12, 1991. Demolition Hearing Minutes 3/28/91 Page 2 Third Case — 2000 Vermont No owner was present. Mr. Salmons explained that the assessed value of the structure is $5,683, estimated cost of repairs is $11,500. Mr. Salmons further explained that the house has no foundation and is listing. The Hearing Officers reviewed pictures of the structure and correspondence sent to the owners. Mr. Thompson determined that the structure at 2000 Vermont be made safe for occupancy, or demolished within 14 days, or by April 12, 1991. Fourth Case — 2602 N. Grand River No owner was present. Mr. Salmons explained that the assessed value of the structure is $22,119, estimated cost of repairs is $25,000. Mr. Salmons stated that he had received a letter from the owner' s attorney stating that this commercial property had been sold to a Mr. Pentecost on land contract, and that they were presently in a law suite with Mr. Pentecost due to the fact that there is contaminated soil on the property. The Hearing Officers reviewed pictures of the structure and correspondence to the owners. Mrs. Jones determined that the structure at 2602 N. Grand River be made safe for its intended use, or demolished within 14 days, or by April 12, 1991. Respec ully b 'tted, Y/ John Salmons Secretary JS/mmr it BY: �__._....._.___. OFFICIAL PROCEE91No ft ` AM 9 19 of the DEMOLITION HEARING OFFICERS March 28, 1991 HEARING OFFICERS PRESENT: J. Paul Thompson and Gloria Jones HEARING OFFICERS ABSENT: Donald Hartwick STAFF PRESENT: John Salmons and Michele Restainer OLD BUSINESS: None NEW BUSINESS: First Case — 1003 Clear Mr. Hubert Benson and Mr. Jim Buysse were present to represent P.M. One Ltd. , no other interested parties were ,present. Mr. Salmons explained that the assessed value of the structure is $6,600, estimated cost of repairs is $14,632. Mr. Salmons further explained that this was a house previously owned by Quaker Management. It is in the flood plain, therefore, the City of Lansing Development Division is unable to loan low interest rate funds for repair. Mr. Thompson asked those represented what the intent was for the structure. Mr. Benson stated that they obtained the house through the court proceedings from Quaker Management. They had also just received notification about the flood plain problem and would be contacting the bank to assess what should be done. Mr. Benson stated that if the mortgage was too high on the structure the bank would probably feel it was beneficial to repair it rather than raze the structure. The Hearing Officer' s reviewed pictures of the structure and correspondence sent to the owner. Mr. Thompson determined that the structure at 1003 Clear be made safe for occupancy, or demolished within 14 days, or by April 12, 1991. Second Case — 1417 Bailey No owner was present. Mr. Salmons explained that the assessed value of the structure is $14,965, estimated cost of repairs is $16,500. Mr. Salmons further explained that this structure was damaged by fire in 1988. The Hearing Officer' s reviewed pictures of the structure and correspondence sent to the owners. Mrs. Jones determined that the structure at 1417 Bailey be made safe for occupancy, or demolished within 14 days, or by April 12, 1991. Demolition Hearing Minutes 3/28/91 Page 2 Third Case — 2000 Vermont No owner was present. Mr. Salmons explained that the assessed value of the structure is $5,683, estimated cost of repairs is $11,500. Mr. Salmons further explained that the house has no foundation and is listing. The Hearing Officers reviewed pictures of the structure and correspondence sent to the owners. Mr. Thompson determined that the structure at 2000 Vermont be made safe for occupancy, or demolished within 14 days, or by April 12, 1991. Fourth Case — 2602 N. Grand River No owner was present. Mr. Salmons explained that the assessed value of the structure is $22,119, estimated cost of repairs' is $25,000. Mr. Salmons stated that he had received a letter from the owner's attorney stating that this commercial property had been sold to a Mr. Pentecost on land contract, and that they were presently in a law suite with Mr. Pentecost due to the fact that there is contaminated soil on the property. The Hearing Officers reviewed pictures of the structure and correspondence to the owners. Mrs. Jones determined that the structure at 2602 N. Grand River be made safe for its intended use, or demolished within 14 days, or by April 12, 1991. Respec ully b 'tted, John Salmons Secretary JS/mmr RECEIVED MAR 11 1991 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS MAYOR'S OFFICE of the CITY OF LANSING DEMOLITION HEARING OFFICERS February 28, 1991 HEARING OFFICERS PRESENT: J. Paul Thompson and Donald Hartwick HEARING OFFICERS ABSENT: Gloria Jones STAFF PRESENT: John Salmons and Michele Restainer OLD BUSINESS: 1206 David The Owner, Henry Hill, was present. Mr. Salmons explained that Mr. Hill has a building permit and has been slowly working on the structure, however, we were not able to reinspect the structure before the meeting. Mr. Hill stated that all the electrical work had been done. He also stated that a mechanical permit had been requested that day. However, he had done nothing with the plumbing. Mr. Hartwick asked if the trash had been removed inside the structure. Mr. Hill stated it had been cleaned out. Mr. Thompson determined, after careful consideration of the facts presented, that the structure at 1206 David be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by March 14, 1991 . NEW BUSINESS: First Case — 620 Baker The Owner, Mr. Gani, was present. Mr. Salmons explained that the assessed value of the straucture is $12,790, estimated cost of repairs is $13,900. Mr. Gani explained that he had sold the structure to Quaker Management at the time they were going under. Because Quaker' s employees had not been paid, they stripped the house of plumbing, wiring, siding, etc. Mr. Gani further explained that he is in the process of forming a corporation to repair houses, such as this one, through this corporation. This structure sits in the middle of a targeted area for this new corporation. The structure could be used to house the new corporation. The Hearing Officers reviewed correspondence and pictures of the structure. Mr. Salmons explained the demolition process to Mr. Gani and the time frames involved. Mr. Thompson determined, after careful consideration of the facts presented, that Demolition Hearing Minutes February 28, 1991 Page 2 the structure at 620 Baker be made safe for occupancy within 14 days or demolished, or by March 14, 1991. Second Case — 426 S. Magnolia Mr. Salmons stated that the structure was 95% done and was pulling; it from consideration. Third Case — 922 W. Lapeer (Garage) The owners were not present. Mr. Salmons explained that the assessed value of the garage is $281, estimated cost of repairs is $7,100. The Hearing Officers reviewed pictures of the structure, and correspondence sent to the owner. Mr. Hartwick determined, after careful consideration of the facts presented, that the structure at 922 W. Lapeer be made safe for occupancy within 14 days or demolished, or by March 14, 1991 . Respe full rbmitted, John Salmons Secretary JS/mmr 8Y: '91 ��►i 13 an 9 11 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS of the DEMOLITION HEARING OFFICERS February 28, 1991 HEARING OFFICERS PRESENT: J. Paul Thompson and Donald Hartwick HEARING OFFICERS ABSENT: Gloria Jones STAFF PRESENT: John Salmons and Michele Restainer OLD BUSINESS: 1206 David The Owner, Henry Hill, was present. Mr. Salmons explained that Mr. Hill has a building permit and has been slowly working on the structure, however, we were not able to reinspect the structure before the meeting. Mr. Hill stated that all the electrical work had been done. He also stated that a mechanical permit had been requested that day. However, he had done nothing with the plumbing. Mr. Hartwick asked if the trash had been removed inside the structure. Mr. Hill stated it had been cleaned out. Mr. Thompson determined, after careful consideration of the facts presented, that the structure at 1206 David be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by March 14, 1991 . NEW BUSINESS: First Case — 620 Baker The Owner, Mr. Gani, was present. Mr. Salmons explained that the assessed value of the straucture is $12,790, estimated cost of repairs is $13,900. Mr. Gani explained that he had sold the structure to Quaker Management at the time they were going under. Because Quaker' s employees had not been paid, they stripped the house of plumbing, wiring, siding, etc. Mr. Gani further explained that he is in the process of forming a corporation to repair houses, such as this one, through this corporation. This structure sits in the middle of a targeted area for this new corporation. The structure could be used to house the new corporation. The Hearing Officers reviewed correspondence and pictures of the structure. Mr. Salmons explained the demolition process to Mr. Gani and the time frames involved. Mr. Thompson determined, after careful consideration of the facts presented, that Demolition Hearing Minutes February 28, 1991 Page 2 the structure at 620 Baker be made safe for occupancy within 14 days or demolished, or by March 14, 1991. Second Case — 426 S. Magnolia Mr. Salmons stated that the structure was 95% clone and was pulling it from consideration. Third Case — 922 W. Lapeer (Garage) The owners were not present. Mr. Salmons explained that the assessed value of the garage is $281, estimated cost of repairs is $7,100. The Hearing Officers reviewed pictures of the structure, and correspondence sent to the owner. Mr. Hartwick determined, after careful consideration of the facts presented, that the structure at 922 W. Lapeer be made safe for occupancy within 14 days or demolished, or by March 14, 1991. Respe "full s�bmitted, r ; John Salmons Secretary JS/mmr BY: __......_... .. ..,... OFFICIAL PROCEEi7iNG5'R An9 21 of the DEMOLITION HEARING OFFICERS January 24, 1991 HEARING OFFICERS PRESENT: Donald Hartwick, Gloria Jones HEARING OFFICER ABSENT: J. Paul Thompson s. 'l"', STAFF PRESENT: Henry Hernandez, Michele Restainer OLD BUSINESS: 4638 Bristol The owner, Steve Chieppo, was present. Mr. Chieppo stated that he had started to make repairs to the foundation, kitchen and bath areas and has reinforced the basement ceiling. He also stated that he will be starting to put in a Michigan wall for the basement in the near future. Mr. Hernandez stated that he had been by the structure on January 24, 1991, and felt that the repairs were not progressing as quickly as they could be. Mr. Hartwick determined that the structure at 4638 Bristol be made safe for occupancy within 14 days, or by February 7, 1991, or be demolished. NEW BUSINESS: First Case — 1810 N. High Mr. Hurbert Benson and Mr. John Brocavich were present representing P.M. One Ltd. Mr. Hernandez Stated that the assessed value of the structure is 10,336, estimated cost of repair is $15,500. Mr. Brocavich addressed the fact that this structure was purchased by Quaker Management at the time of their downfall and that P.O. One took over the mortgage. Mr. Hernandez addressed the fact that the structure is a non—conforming three family unit, and because it has been vacant for over 360 days the structure would not be able to be rehabilitated for a three family unit, but only a one or two family unit. Mr. Hernandez explained that the structure has deteriorated very badly for lack of proper maintenance and the type of tenants that the previous owner had rented to. The Hearing Officers reviewed pictures of the structure and correspondence sent to the owner. Mr. Hartwick determined that the structure at 1810 N. High be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by February 7, 1991. Second Case — 1206 David Demolition Hearing 1 ites January 24, 1991 Page 2 The new owner, Henry Hill, was present. Mr. Hernandez explained that the assessed value of the structure is $5,822, estimated cost of repair is $10,300. Mr. Hill explained that he had just taken postion of the structure on January 15, 1991, and has only removed some of the debris around the structure. No permits have been pulled though at this time. Mr. Hill further explained that he believed there was a new furnace in the structure. The Hearing Officers viewed pictures of the structure and correspondence sent to the owner. Mr. Hill was also advised that he must have licensed contractors pull the permits. and do the work on the structure. Ms. Jones determined that this be tabled for 30 days to allow the new owner time to pull permits and begin work. Third Case — 328 N. Cedar The owner, Mr. Dean R. Prince, was present along with Mr. Bob Prince, his father, and Ms. Bonnie Weiss, next—door business owner. Mr. Hernandez explained that the assessed value of the structure is $1,089, estimated cost of repair is $36,000+. Mr. Prince stated that the structure had been vacant for one to two years, however he had been using the front for produce storage. Mr. Prince also stated that he was contemplating demolition of the structure and was obtaining bids. Ms. Weiss stated that vagrants were sleeping in the building and there was evidence of rodents in and around the structure. The Hearing Officers viewed pictures of the structure and correspondence sent to the owner. Mr. Hartwick determined that the structure at 328 N. Cedar be made safe for its intended use within 14 days, or by February 7, 1991, or demolished. Fourth Case — 604 Helen Previous owner, Charles A. Patterson, and Marget Patterson were present. Mr. Patterson stated that he no longer was the owner and provided a warranty deed, not recored with the County, that Mr. Makzum M. Hassouna was now the owner. However, Mr. Hassouna was not present. Mr. Hernandez stated that the assessed value of the structure is $5,690, estimated cost of repairs is $15,995. The Hearing Officers viewed pictures of the structure and correspondence that had been sent to Mr. Patterson. Ms. Jones asked if Mr. Hassouna was aware of the problems with the structure and of the Hearing. Mr. Patterson stated that he was. Ms. Jones determined that the structure at 604 Helen be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by February 7, 1991. Fifth Case — 1735 Fidelity No owner was present. Mr. Hernandez explained that the assessed value of the structure was $5,000, estimated cost of repairs is $9,700. Mr. Hernandez further explained that the owner of the structure was an elderly lady who did not have running water, heat, or electricity. The Hearing Officers viewed pictures of the structure and correspondence to the owner. Demolition Hearing lutes January 24, 1991 Page 3 Mr. Hartwick determined that the structure at 1735 Fidelity be made safe for occupancy within 14 days, or by February 7, 1991, or demolished. Sixth Case — 407 S. Fairview No owner was present. Mr. Hernandez explained that the assessed value of the structure is $11,262, estimated cost of repairs is $14,000. It was explained to the Hearing Officers that the owner had abandoned the structure and it was in the process of reverting back to D.H.U.D. The Hearing Officers viewed pictures of the structure and correspondence to the owner. Mr. Hartwich determined that the structure at 407 S. Fairview be made safe for occupancy within 14 days, or by February 7, 1991, or demolished. Seventh Case — 820 Prospect No owner was present. Mr. Hernandez explained that the assessed value of the structure is $14,981, estimated cost of repairs is $16,300. It was explained to the Hearing Officers that a representative from Team Development had dropped off a copy of repairs that were to be made, however, no time frames were stipulated in the document. Mr. Hernandez explained that the structure has been deteriorating for some time. The Hearing Officers review pictures and correspondence sent to the owner. Ms. Jones determined that the structure at 820 Prospect be made safe for occupancy within 14 days, or by February 7, 1991, or demolished. Eighth Case — 113 E. Cavanaugh No owner was present. Mr. Hernandez explained that the assessed value of the structure is $6,201, estimated cost of repairs is $17,500. Mr. Hernandez stated that the structure was vacated by the Building Safety Division due to unsafe conditions in the structure. The Hearing Officers reviewed pictures of the structure and correspondence sent to the owner. Mr. Hartwick determined that the structure at 113 E. Cavanaugh be made safe for occupancy within 14 days, or by February 7, 1991, or demolished. Respectfully sumbitted, Henry nHenandez Acting Secretary HH/mmr j\E0D. +=R 1C BY: OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS '91 FEB 18 Pn 3 59 of the DEMOLITION HEARING OFFICERS January 24, 1991 HEARING OFFICERS PRESENT: Donald Hartwick, Gloria Jones HEARING OFFICER ABSENT: J. Paul Thompson STAFF PRESENT: Henry Hernandez, Michele Restainer OLD BUSINESS: 4638 Bristol The owner, Steve Chieppo, was present. Mr. Chieppo stated that he had started to make repairs to the foundation, kitchen and bath areas and has reinforced the basement ceiling. He also stated that he will be starting to put in a Michigan wall for the basement in the near future. Mr. Hernandez stated that he had been by the structure on January 24, 1991, and felt that the repairs were not progressing as quickly as they could be. Mr. Hartwick determined that the structure at 4638 Bristol be made safe for occupancy within 14 days, or by February 7, 1991, or be demolished. NEW BUSINESS: First Case — 1810 N. High Mr. Hurbert Benson and Mr. John Brocavich were present representing P.M. One Ltd. Mr. Hernandez stated that the assessed value of the structure is 10,336, estimated cost of repair is $15,500. Mr. Brocavich addressed the fact that this structure was purchased by Quaker Management at the time of their downfall and that P.O. One took over the mortgage. Mr. Hernandez addressed the fact that the structure is a non—conforming three family unit, and because it has been vacant for over 360 days the structure would not be able to be rehabilitated for a three family unit, but only a one or two family unit. Mr. Hernandez explained that the structure has deteriorated very badly for lack of proper maintenance and the type of tenants that the previous owner had rented to. The Hearing Officers reviewed pictures of the structure and correspondence sent to the owner. Mr. Hartwick determined that the structure at 1810 N. High be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by February 7, 1991. Second Case — 1206 David Demolition Hearing Mii ss January 24, 1991 Page 2 The new owner, Henry Hill, was present. Mr. Hernandez explained that the assessed value of the structure is $5,822, estimated cost of repair is $10,300. Mr. Hill explained that he had just taken postion of the structure on January 15, 1991, and has only removed some of the debris around the structure. No permits have been pulled though at this time. Mr. Hill further explained that he believed there was a new furnace in the structure. The Hearing Officers viewed pictures of the structure and correspondence sent to the owner. Mr. Hill was also advised that he must have licensed contractors pull the permits and do the work on the structure. Ms. Jones determined that this be tabled for 30 days to allow the new owner time to pull permits and begin work. Third Case — 328 N. Cedar The owner, Mr. Dean R. Prince, was present along with Mr. Bob Prince, his father, and Ms. Bonnie Weiss, next—door business owner. Mr. Hernandez explained that the assessed value of the structure is $1,089, estimated cost of repair is $36,000+. Mr. Prince stated that the structure had been vacant for one to two years, however he had been using the front for produce storage. Mr. Prince also stated that he was contemplating demolition of the structure and was obtaining bids. Ms. Weiss stated that vagrants were sleeping in the building and there was evidence of rodents in and around the structure. The Hearing Officers viewed pictures of the structure and correspondence sent to the owner. Mr. Hartwick determined that the structure at 328 N. Cedar be made safe for its intended use within 14 days, or by February 7, 1991, or demolished. Fourth Case — 604 Helen Previous owner, Charles A. Patterson, and Marget Patterson were present. Mr. Patterson stated that he no longer was the owner and provided a warranty deed, not recored with the County, that Mr. Makzum M. Hassouna was now the owner. However, Mr. Hassouna was not present. Mr. Hernandez stated that the assessed value of the structure is $5,690, estimated cost of repairs is $15,995. The Hearing Officers viewed pictures of the structure and correspondence that had been sent to Mr. Patterson. Ms. Jones asked if Mr. Hassouna was aware of the problems with the structure and of the Hearing. Mr. Patterson stated that he was. Ms. Jones determined that the structure at 604 Helen be made safe for occupancy or demolished within 14 days, or by February 7, 1991. Fifth Case — 1735 Fidelity No owner was present. Mr. Hernandez explained that the assessed value of the structure was $5,000, estimated cost of repairs is $9,700. Mr. Hernandez further explained that the owner of the structure was an elderly lady who did not have running water, heat, or electricity. The Hearing Officers viewed pictures of the structure and correspondence to the owner. Demolition Hearing Mi es January 24, 1991 Page 3 Mr. Hartwick determined that the structure at 1735 Fidelity be made safe for occupancy within 14 days, or by February 7, 1991, or demolished. Sixth Case — 407 S. Fairview No owner was present. Mr. Hernandez explained that the assessed value of the structure is $11,262, estimated cost of repairs is $14,000. It was explained to the Hearing Officers that the owner had abandoned the structure and it was in the process of reverting back to D.H.U.D. The Hearing Officers viewed pictures of the structure and correspondence to the owner. Mr. Hartwich determined that the structure at 407 S. Fairview be made safe for occupancy within 14 days, or by February 7, 1991, or demolished. Seventh Case — 820 Prospect No owner was present. Mr. Hernandez explained that the assessed value of the structure is $14,981, estimated cost of repairs is $16,300. It was explained to the Hearing Officers that a representative from Team Development had dropped off a copy of repairs that were to be made, however, no time frames were stipulated in the document. Mr. Hernandez explained that the structure has been deteriorating for some time. The Hearing Officers review pictures and correspondence sent to the owner. Ms. Jones determined that the structure at 820 Prospect be made safe for occupancy within 14 days, or by February 7, 1991, or demolished. Eighth Case — 113 E. Cavanaugh No owner was present. Mr. Hernandez explained that the assessed value of the structure is $6,201, estimated cost of repairs is $17,500. Mr. Hernandez stated that the structure was vacated by the Building Safety Division due to unsafe conditions in the structure. The Hearing Officers reviewed pictures of the structure and correspondence sent to the owner. Mr. Hartwick determined that the structure at 113 E. Cavanaugh be made safe for occupancy within 14 days, or by February 7, 1991, or demolished. Respectfully sumbitted, nyHe nandez Acting Secretary HH/mmr